Transcription
What if I told you that Dune is a masterpiece, not just for the story, but for the hidden philosophy that writer Frank Herbert carefully embedded into every single chapter? Herbert spent 6 years researching the psychology of why humans surrender themselves to charismatic leaders. And once you understand some of the key concepts he folded into the narrative, I guarantee you'll have a whole new appreciation for this amazing story. Let's get into it.
Author Frank Herbert got the idea for Dune while, unironically, studying sand dunes. In 1959, he was assigned to write a magazine article about sand dunes near Florence, Oregon. In a biography written about Frank Herbert by Tim O'Reilly, it reads, "Herbert became fascinated by sand dunes, the irresistible way they move, swallowing roads, houses, and on occasion entire towns. He saw real drama in the effort to control dunes by planting hardy grasses instead of building walls. The article was never published, but Herbert was hooked, both on ecology and on sand."
Around the same time, Frank became obsessed with hero worship and its oftentimes disastrous effects on mankind. In an article he wrote called Dune Genesis about the inspiration for Dune, he explains, "I conceived of a long novel, the whole trilogy as one book about the messianic convulsions that periodically overtake us. Demagogues, fanatics, con game artists, the innocent, and the not-so-innocent bystanders, all were to have a part in the drama." This grows from my theory that superheroes are disastrous for humankind. Even if we find a real hero, whatever or whoever that may be, eventually fallible mortals take over the power structure that always comes into being around such a leader. It's here that these two vastly different subjects, sand dunes and hero worship, became enmeshed in Frank's mind.
He started worrying about ecology being the next frontier for demagogues and power seekers to launch a new crusade. We explicitly see this in the events of Dune. The Fremen have a long-term dream to terraform Arrakis. This is their sacred project, tended by Fremen ecologists for generations before Paul arrives. When Paul shows up, he steps into the messianic role that the Bene Gesserit have already been prepping the Fremen for for centuries. And so, this ecological dream, terraforming Arrakis, gets fused with Paul's messianic identity. He becomes the figure who will lead them to the promised land, the one who will make the deserts bloom.
While reading Herbert's article about the making of Dune, this line really stood out to me. He writes, "Our society operates on guilt." Herbert's actual point is that humans often feel guilty about injustices, environmental destruction, and inequality, and that this guilt can be easily weaponized. It's like the folks who call themselves social justice warriors today. Even though I personally agree with many of the things they're fighting for, I can't deny that the feeling you get when you fight, when you join a crusade, when you march behind a banner, can be dangerous. There's a physiological rush to fighting for certain causes. You feel like you're doing something, like you're righteous. And that can be extremely dangerous, Frank argues. The insidious part is that the adrenaline high of joining the cause can become the actual point, more than solving the underlying problem.
In Dune Genesis, Frank Herbert also writes, "This, then, was one of my themes for Dune. Don't give over all of your critical faculties to people in power, no matter how admirable those people may appear to be. Beneath the hero's facade, you will find a human being who makes human mistakes. Enormous problems arise when human mistakes are made on the grandest scale available to a superhero." Paul's father, Leto, is a good man. I remember watching him in Dune part one, inspired by how much he cared for his men, and feeling devastated when he died. This, Frank Herbert argues, can turn into a problem. It's not just bad leaders that are dangerous, but good ones, too. Good leaders are dangerous because their goodness makes us want to surrender our individual judgment directly to them even more. They're so genuinely admirable that people around them can stop thinking for themselves and follow them with fanatic loyalty.
In Tim O'Reilly's biography of Frank Herbert, he writes, "Feudalism is a natural condition into which men fall, a situation in which some men lead and others, surrendering the responsibility to make their own decisions, follow orders. Duke Leto is generous, boldhearted, and loved fiercely by all who follow him. Even his enemies admire him. A leader such as that would command fanatic loyalty. He would be difficult to defeat." O'Reilly suggests that Herbert sees feudalism as a psychological tendency humans have naturally. When life is confusing and hard, there's a relief in letting someone else make the decisions, especially if they're a good person. It's not only relief, but it feels like the right thing to do. But the deeper argument Frank's trying to make is the goodness of the leader is irrelevant to the danger of the dynamic. Why? Because it feels justified to hand over power to these people. It feels righteous.
One of the biggest inspirations for Frank Herbert while writing Dune was Islam, Arabic culture, and Ibn Khaldun, a 14th-century North African historian and sociologist. These influences are obvious, not just in the language of the Fremen, but in the events of the story. One quote that stood out to me while reading Tim O'Reilly's book on Frank Herbert was this one. In his research, Herbert had noted how the desert seems to be a wellspring of religion. The history of Judaism demonstrates that harsh conditions make for a religion of anticipation, and Islam, which we tend to associate more than any other faith with a desert environment, is perhaps the most messianic religion of all. Why does this happen?
To understand it better, let's turn to the work of Islamic philosopher Ibn Khaldun. Khaldun was basically the first person to develop a scientific theory of how civilizations rise and fall. His theory is based on a concept called asabiyyah, which basically means social cohesion. This cohesion extends beyond just family or tribe to include a huge number of people. Khaldun argues that large movements or dynasties begin with a strong asabiyyah built on things like hardship or tribal/kinship ties. Take the United States of America, for instance. This country and the revolution that made it was built on top of immense asabiyyah founded on irritations about taxation without representation. Then, as the state gains power and wealth accumulates, the ruling class becomes increasingly detached from its original base. This erodes asabiyyah over time, leading to the fall of the civilization. And then the cycle repeats as new groups with strong asabiyyah rise to replace the old order. Khaldun studied this throughout his life, watching the cyclical nature of government in North Africa. He saw and studied how decadent ruling regimes were overthrown at regular intervals by tribal groups, and how over time the new ruling regimes would reflect the depravity of the regime they displaced. We see this in Dune with the decadence of the Harkonnens and the empire. They've lost their social cohesion after years of being at the top of the pyramid. Then, the Fremen, who have immense social cohesion after centuries of hardship, replace them and end up killing 60 billion people in a holy war. The Fremen become just as bad, if not way worse, than their predecessors.
Real quick, if you want to talk with me about movies every month, join my Sunday film club. We meet on the last Sunday of every month at 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time to talk about movies together. Become a paid subscriber to my Substack for $5 per month or $50 per year to get access to those calls. The link to sign up is in the top right corner here, as well as the description.
It's here I want to highlight something Frank Herbert wrote that seems controversial on its face, but is actually really poignant when you dive deep into what he actually meant. In Dune Genesis, he writes, "I now believe that no society has ever achieved an absolute pinnacle, that all humans are not created equal. In fact, I believe attempts to create some abstract equalization create a mass of injustices that rebound on the equalizers. Equal justice and equal opportunity are ideals we should seek, but we should recognize that humans administer the ideals, and that humans do not have equal ability." When he talks of inequality, he's actually talking about things like judgment, wisdom, and resistance to corruption. The gist of his argument is that when you try to design a perfect system, one that tries to provide equal outcome through systems and institutions, that you introduce new injustices because those systems are run by humans who are anything but perfect. Humans have different judgment, wisdom, and resistance to corruption. Evolution, be it biological, social, or moral, never stops, which means any structure you build is already beginning to decay or transform the moment you finish it. The people who believe they found the final answer or the perfect system or the ideal leader, those are the most dangerous people alive because they'll enforce their answer on everyone else and stop the adaptation that life requires.
Speaking of adaptation, in Tim O'Reilly's biography of Frank Herbert, he writes, "An ecosystem is stable not because it is secure and protected, but because it contains enough diversity that certain organisms will survive despite drastic changes in the in the environment and other adverse conditions. Strength lies in adaptability, not fixity. Civilization, on the other hand, tries to create and maintain security, which all too frequently crystallizes into an effort to minimize diversity and stop change." In Dune part one, we see this philosophy reflected in a vision Paul has of Jamis, where he says, "The mystery of life isn't a problem to be solved, but a reality to experience, a process that cannot be understood by stopping it. We must move with the flow of the process. We must join it. We must flow with it."
Frank Herbert believed that humans have a tendency to, in an uncertain world, surrender themselves to a charismatic leader to feel more in control. In Tim's book, he writes, "In Herbert's terms, religion and its attendant hero worship are human adaptations to uncertainty. Both faith and charismatic leaders spring from a deep hunger for security and meaning in a universe which, as Paul notes, is always one step beyond logic."
In Dune Genesis, Frank Herbert writes, "The verb to be does make idiots of us all." For example, when we say X is Y or things like this is the right system or this is the truth, we're freezing a moving reality into a fixed label. But when reality continues changing, those labels stay still and then we fight and kill over those labels. The word is gives us false certainty about an infinitely uncertain universe. It's here that we begin to touch on another huge influence for Frank Herbert when he wrote Dune, which is Alfred Korzybski's general semantics or the study of how language shapes thought.
This is why the Bene Gesserit's voice is so central to the plot of the story. Alfred Korzybski developed what he called general semantics in the 1930s with a foundational idea of the map is not the territory. Basically, the word for the thing is not the thing itself. For instance, when you say the sun rises, it's not actually a true statement. The Earth revolves around the sun while rotating on its axis, thus giving the illusion that the sun is rising in the sky, but it's not actually doing that. The phrase encodes a completely false model of reality, one where the sun moves and we are stationary, and we use it every single day without thinking about it. Korzybski believed that the gap between the word and reality is where all human conflict, delusion, and misery originates. For example, if you believe a certain type of person is dangerous because of a label, you will perceive every individual from that group as dangerous even if your personal experience tells you otherwise. Another example is how we react to words as if they were physical objects. If someone insults you, you are reacting to sound waves rather than the physical harmless air pressure that actually hit your ear. It's absolutely fascinating when you dig into it and Frank Herbert included this in Dune because of how influential language can really be to control people.
With the Bene Gesserits and the voice, Frank's idea was that if language can shape thought in a way we're not even conscious of, then those who master language can bypass a person's rational mind and control them directly. Language obviously doesn't work exactly like it does for us, like the Bene Gesserits in Dune, but language does have unconscious effects on us in real life to the extent where we're controlled by it without even knowing it. The Bene Gesserits' entire manipulation of the Fremen across generations works through language. They seed prophecies, which are just words, which then shape how the Fremen perceive reality for thousands of years until the words become so real to them that an actual human being can step into that slot the prophecy created.
Let's take a look at the word leader, for instance. When you say that someone is a leader, you give them a quality that's now transferable to new situations. But really, if someone is a leader, it means that people follow them right now in this context for these reasons. It doesn't mean that they'll always be a good leader, but when you say he's a leader, it implies that leading is part of their identity, that it's who they are. Korzybski's point was that all language works this way to some degree. Every is statement freezes something dynamic into something fixed. We can't stop doing it. Language requires it. But we can become conscious of it, which is what the Bene Gesserit trained themselves to do. They learn to hold the word and the reality separately, always aware that the map is not the territory.
What did you notice about the philosophy of Dune? Let me know in the comments. And if you like this film analysis, consider subscribing to my channel. I publish new film analysis like this every week. Thanks so much for watching. I'll see you next time.