Transcription
All right, live free nation. This is going to be an interesting little react episode. James Tarico, who's becoming a little, you know, a little pod favorite in some ways here. Uh he is becoming quickly like one of the most um popular rising stars in Texas politics, actually in national politics. And um he very frequently kind of poses as a uh as a Christian pastor and makes um some pretty outrageous claims. This uh clip that we're getting ready to react to right here. um Terica was on Joe Rogan went like insane viral and he made some uh comments that have gone like again insane viral um that are confusing a lot of Christians saying things like uh the Bible actually supports uh abortion and he gives some uh confusing arguments that confuse Christians on why and Jesus never said anything about homosexuality and this went so viral that me uh Carlos Arazzo and Chad GP LT hopped in the studio and we're going to react to this Torico Joe Rogan clip. So without further ado, here we go.
>> This is for a little bit of context. This is a Joe Rogan interview with James Terico. I hope I'm pronouncing his name right.
>> And James is a he is a American politician uh like you said quoteunquote pastor, former teacher and he is what?
>> Go ahead.
>> Well, you you describe him to the title pastor. pastor in the synagogue of Satan.
>> That's right. That's why I'm saying that's that's it. And
>> self-proclaimed um
>> and so man, let's uh let's just have jump in.
>> So, it just I get suspicious when anybody whether it's a a a televangelist or a politician tells me that something is central to my faith when Jesus never talks about it.
>> Wait, wait. Actually, let him keep going so we know what he's saying. Jesus never talked about. Mhm.
>> To me, that should I think ring alarm bells um as to what is the agenda here? Um what is someone trying to to get across? And I think if we're looking at the last 40, 50 years, the religious right has made a concerted effort to make homosexuality and abortion the two biggest issues for Christians.
>> All right. Plus, so he his first of all, let's here's why we're doing this. A the number of people that sent this to me was insane. B, it confused a lot of people and it went like super mega viral.
>> So, this is the kind of stuff you're going to hear a lot.
>> So, I just want to like walk through it biblically. So, Paul Cunningham, you start. This James says Jesus never talked about homosexuality. Let's do homosexuality first because he's going to talk about abortion later.
>> Yeah. I get suspicious anyone anytime someone uses the argument Jesus never talked about fill in the blank. Mh.
>> So my alarm bells start going off when I hear that cuz usually it just betrays to me that the person is generally intentionally or unintentionally ignorant of just how biblical arguments work, biblical reasoning works and things like that. And so I think when I hear things like this, I used to tell people three things we need to remember. Number one is Jesus's Bible. Number two, Jesus's identity. And number three, Jesus's context. So in terms of Jesus's Bible, he affirmed the authority of the Old Testament. He said, "I've not come to abolish the law, but to fulfill it." And so that basically says, hey, everything in the Old Testament, I affirm that in terms of God's moral commands. Then we have to remember his identity that Jesus was God. And so when he says, "Oh, Jesus never said that." Like, well, if it said it in the Old Testament, he is God. Actually, it is his words. Now, it was inspired by the Holy Spirit, but we have to remember in Christian belief, God has one mind, not three. So, it's not like the Holy Spirit and and the Son of God are thinking different things. Oh, they're thinking the same thing. And so, everything that the Holy Spirit inspired are Jesus's thoughts as well. There you go. Including everything in the Old Testament. And then finally, have to remember Jesus's context is Jesus never talked about things like idolatry either. Even though idolatry was the number one sin in the Old Testament and the reason is because that wasn't being debated. Jesus was around mostly Jewish people, they weren't debating that and weren't practicing it anymore. So, he didn't need to address it. But what you see in Acts and in the epistles is all of a sudden as the gospel goes out into the gentile world where things like idolatry and homosexuality and other things like that are practiced, they do have to address it because they're in cultures that embrace it and where there is error.
>> That's really good.
>> Yeah. So again, so we have to remember Jesus's uh Bible, his identity, and his context.
>> All right. So here's what I'll say. So in response to the because you you hear this a lot. Jesus never talked about samesex attraction or marriage or whatever. So, one thing I'll say is Jesus never said anything about nuclear warheads, beastiality, or paper straws, but they're all awful, too.
>> Yeah.
>> You know, and I just got to throw paper straws in there because I really want them to go away. But like, you know, so that's number one. It's an argument from silence. It's the weakest form of argument. Argument from silence. There's tons of stuff Jesus never explicitly talked about that everyone knows
>> are evil. Every everybody knows that. Number two is Can I say something else?
>> Yeah, please.
>> And yet he did he did talk about sexuality. He did talk about marriage. Oh, okay. Okay, go ahead.
>> Yeah. Number two, that's just not true that Jesus never talked about this. So, if here here's my analogy.
>> If somebody were to ask me, um, hey Josh, who if they walk into Lake Point, they go, "Hey Josh, who's your wife? Which which one's your wife?" There's two ways that I can make clear who my wife is. Either I can point to 24,999 people and individually say, "That's not my wife, and that's not my wife, and that's not my wife, and that that's not my wife," until no one's left with Jana. Or I can just point to Jana and go that's my wife and by implication everything else is not my wife. Okay. So what Jesus does over and over again multiple times in the gospels is he defines what is acceptable sexual expression and what is biblical marriage.
>> So instead of having to literally name for instance I I mentioned this Jesus never addresses beastiality or incest. Everyone knows those things are wrong.
>> Only fans ex
>> Yeah. only talking about only fans. So, um, what Jesus did is he went, man, I can't I'm not going to list every single thing that is wrong. That's impos it. Take forever. So, let me just go here's what's right? And then by implication, everything else is out. So, this is Matthew 19. Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked Jesus, "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?" Jesus responds. So words of Jesus right here. Haven't you read? He replied that at the beginning the creator made them male and female. So transgenderism is out. And said for this reason a man will leave his father and mother. So like lazy, don't work, live in your mom's basement forever. That's out. And be united to his wife. So in other words, we need we get married and the two will become one flesh. So what you have there is you have the definition of marriage. And then he says, "Therefore, what God has joined together, let no one separate." What you have there is a sexual, heterosexual, lifelong covenant union between a man and a woman. And Jesus goes, "That's what's right. By implication, everything else is out." And I love you went to that text because when Jesus defines marriage um it's usually in response to questions about divorce. So Jesus could have simply said don't divorce like he could have answered the question really briefly and said no. He could have even quoted part of it and said well God has brought together let people not separate. But I think he knew what he was doing.
>> He intentionally went back and even just define the whole scope of marriage and then went on there. That's just one thing I think it's important to point out. So yes, he didn't use specific language around homosexuality, but he knew what he was doing when he defined it. He could have simply said, "Nope, don't get divorced." But he actually gave a positive definition of marriage and identified the target. Like you said,
>> you will also, to Paul's point, you'll hear people sometimes, and there's a there's a wonderful grace in this.
>> You will hear people sometimes mistakenly be like, "Oh man, there's a few Old Testament clobber passages." Actually, this is reaffirmed in the New Testament. So here's your homework. go read Romans 1 or 1 Corinthians 6. And here's what I love about 1 Corinthians 6 is he lists all these sins and he lists things like theft and murder and you know uh there's a few other slander a few other things. And then he goes and men who practice homosexuality and he goes man these people will not inherit the kingdom of God. And he's saying if you continue in these sins in an unrepentant way then that is an indication you have not placed your faith in the lordship of Jesus and submitted to him. So you won't inherit the kingdom of God. But then he goes, "And such were some of you,
>> but you were washed. You were cleansed. You were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus."
>> That's gospel.
>> That's amazing. Good news.
>> So, it's simply untrue that Jesus and especially the New Testament ever talk about this, it specifically does. You want to keep going?
>> Let's keep going.
>> Yeah.
>> Actually, can I say one more thing? Please do. Actually, so I'm so sorry I cut you off.
>> I think even just to help people clarify cuz it's a common misnomer to say, "Oh, the religious right has made these two issues the biggest issue." No. No, the biggest two issues is the lordship of Jesus and the authority of his word.
>> And so anytime you're going to challenge that, we're going to respond. And then with that, one thing that sometimes theologians or historians like to say is that heresy often precedes orthodoxy. Not in the sense that we make up what we believe, but when our what we believe begins to be challenged, we then have to directly and clearly articulate what Christians have always believed. So it may seem like we're the ones who are elevating these things. We're simply responding to what the culture has elevated.
>> Yeah. That's one of my dude as a pastor that's like one of my pet peeves is like the entire culture will scream about an issue and it's like every commercial, every movie, every talk show, everything you read is about this issue and then a pastor addresses it. They're like, "You that's the only thing you focus on." Like bro, are you kidding? Like preach the Bible only. Like are you guys I hate that. All right, let's keep going. Keep going. And you know, the Southern Baptist Convention was pro-choice until the late 1970s.
>> Okay, we pause. Do we want to do all of the Do we want to listen to the whole thing and then go to arguments or you want it clip by clip?
>> Let's do that. Let's get Let's do clip by clip. Yeah, because I want to make sure we we answer that.
>> Paul Cunningham, the Southern Baptist Convention was pro-choice until the 1970s. What say you?
>> Uh, no.
>> Just a great example of maybe a half truth being twisted to try to make your argument. And I actually think we have the text that we're going to put up of a resolution from 1971.
>> You pulled it.
>> I pulled it. I pulled it. So if we're going to say memoriz context, we're going to skip down actually to where it says, "Be it therefore resolved.
>> Be it therefore resolved at the Southern Baptist Convention." This is a key line. While reaffirming our historic commitment to the sanctity of life.
>> What year was this?
>> This is 1971. So, in other words, what they're about to say before they say it while reaffirming other saying, "Hey, we are prolife." And then it goes on and it does say, "Call upon Southern Baptist to work for legislation that will allow for the possibility of abortion under such conditions as rape, incest, clear evidence of severe fetal deformality, and then likelihood of damage to the emotional, mental, and physical health of the mother." Um, so they were not pro-choice, they were pro-life, but as a denomination did decide that they would say, "Hey, there are some exceptions that we believe should be legal." Now, that doesn't mean that we have to agree with what they said, by the way, because a few years later, I do not there was what was called the conservative resurgence, that there were very liberal elements in the Southern Baptist Convention at this time. And over the next 10 to 15 to 20 years, there was a resurgence that basically said, "Hey, we have drifted away from the Bible, and we need to reclaim that." So, I'm not saying this to say, "Hey, we agree with what Southern Baptist wrote here." It's really just trying to give the greater context of saying, "Hey, while we're reaffirming our commitment to the sanctity of human life." So, they were not pro-choice. They were pro-life with exceptions. I'll add this. So, the implication that James, Synagogue of Satan, Pastor, whatever his name is, what his implication is like, um, and by the way, if somebody's listening, they're like, "That's mean." I'm going to explain why I'm saying that later. Yeah. It's not mean. It's It's actually a very loving thing to be very clear about something like that.
>> So, but the implication he's trying to make is man actually this is something that churches just disagreed on and various opinions agree to disagree.
>> That's right.
>> Uh that is just historically radically false. So like all the way back to something called the dedicay which was a collection of Christian writings um like right after actually the dedicay was written before the book of revelation if I remember right.
>> Yeah. Well, in this late 90s, early hundreds, many would say it was written concurrently with the Gospel of John. So, like this is this is still in the a time when the some of the apostles were living and early Christians.
>> So, here's a quote from the dedicay, the earliest Christians.
>> What What is it? Explain it for the people that have no idea what that
>> it's like a collection of devotional writings. Um, how would you describe it?
>> Literally just means the teaching. It's like a church manual. It's like an early church manual basically saying, "Hey, here's just a list of the things." Yeah. Yeah.
>> There's here's a quote from the dedicay AD70. You, this is pretty straightforward. You shall not procure abortion. Like, it's kind of straightforward. Uh, this is, here's one from what was called the letter of Barnabas. It's an apocryphal deal, but it's a dated to around AD74. Thou shalt not slay the child by procuring abortion. Um, early church father Tertullan AD 197. Here's a quote from Tertullan. Murder being once for all forbidden, we may not destroy even the fetus in the womb. Tertullan 197 AD.
>> Wow.
>> Here's John Crosam. Uh I think didn't they call him golden mouth? The golden mouth. I think
>> he was one of the greatest preachers in the history.
>> That's what they say. Yeah. A lot of people say John Chrysum. Yeah. Uh and he refers to in a John Chrostm sermon murder before the birth.
>> So it's like this is the uniform testimony of the church for since the beginning. If we fast forward a thousand years, Thomas Aquin is talking about um something called the sentences. He who destroys life in the womb incurs the guilt of murder. So even like sometimes I think he's just basically the guys trying to say oh yeah it's just agree to disagree issue people have disagreed like no like if I put you in a travel machine time travel machine and we went to any time before really last 50 years like this view would have been described as heresy.
>> Yeah.
>> I mean just outright heresy. Yeah. And just to clarify, we don't have time to expand too much on this, but for somebody that's listening in and is curious because they're like, "Well, but do you agree with the 1971 position of like, yes, prolife, but with some of these exceptions, Josh, you would say, I
>> I do not."
>> That's right.
>> Yeah, I do not. Now, by the way,
>> tremendous overwhelming like compassion
>> for any any circumstance like that. Um, but no, like and dude, some people are like, "Josh, are you crazy? That's what you believe?" I'm like, "Actually, no. That's not what I believe. That's what the Bible says. And I'm I'm going to be a Bible guy. And the Bible's just really clear. You shall not murder. Murder equals the taking of innocent life. This a whole different podcast. There's there's the just taking of life and the unjust taking of life. The just taking of life are things like the death penalty for appropriate criminal offenses. And the unjust taking of life is anything else.
>> So, I'm just like, "Hey, man. I I do not think one sin necessitates another egreg another sin.
>> I'm sure we'll address all of this because I'm sure people are going to be asking some more questions in a future episode. Just FYI, that's probably coming soon. Let's keep going.
>> Well, when was abortion even invented?
>> Well, there was certainly abortions in the ancient world. There there is some
>> well there's some there's and again I haven't stated this enough to to say this definitively but there are interpretations of certain passages from the Torah where some folks will even say that there is a um there's some subtle instructions for how to perform an abortion in the ancient world certain things to drink things like that.
>> Let's pause. You want to start or you want me to start?
>> You're probably in a more
>> All right. Let me talk let me talk about what he's referring to. Okay, he's referring to Numbers 5. Numbers 5 uh 11-31. It gives these it's a Old Testament law and it's giving the instructions for what the nation of Israel should do when there's a woman accused of adultery, but there are not witnesses. So, the husband has reason, maybe biological reasons, to believe that his wife has been unfaithful, but there's not multiple witnesses. Numbers five is pre prescribing what should have been done in Old Testament uh Israel uh in that circumstance. And here's I'll I'll give a quick description of it. So that the priest would put the woman under oath and make her swear under penalty of a curse that she was innocent of adultery. After the wife swore her innocence, her oath was written on a scroll. Next, the priest put the scroll into the water until ink came up off uh off the water, at which point he removed the scroll from the cup. Then the priest took the grain offering from the woman, burned it on the altar, and she would drink the bitter water. If innocent, then the bitter water would have no effect. But then if guilty, uh, there would be a physical consequence. And there's debate about how the translation of the physical consequence. We can get to that in a second, but that's what he's referring to. Paul, your response.
>> Yeah. Three issues. Number one, the text never mentions pregnancy.
>> Ah, yes. Very important. Interesting. Number two, this is about, and you were basically saying this, it's about divine judgment, not human abortion.
>> That's right.
>> And then number three, traditional Jewish interpreters have never seen this as about abortion.
>> And so, one thing that I actually like when I'm teaching people how to interpret the Bible is that if you're seeing something no one has seen before, it's because it isn't there.
>> I mean, that that's why even when we were referring to people and their views in this throughout history, um, tradition can be a bad thing, but conditional can also be a good thing. Tradition is the democracy of the dead. It's where dead people get a vote. And if if no one really has seen this until like again the last 50 years and interpreted the text in this way, that should give us pause. So those are just three huge issues with this text in terms of using this of any kind of a reference to justify abortion at the Bible teaches abortion.
>> That's exactly right. So the the things to keep in mind. So and we don't need to deep dive into this. Let's keep going through the clip. But essentially there's um there's debate about the translation of the physical consequence that you know the Bible says would happen under the judgment of God. You most people translate it the falling away of the thigh. What he's doing is some people will translate it as like the shriveling up of the womb
>> and then he's imputing into the text as Paul mentions pregnancy is never mentioned that ah well if if she was pregnant because of the adultery then it's talking about the miscarriage or there and number one Paul mentions that's pregnancy is never mentioned number two that's the that's not the likely interpretation of the passage number three we just need to acknowledge this it is not culturally uh popular to acknowledge this but Um uh the potter has the right over the clay.
>> Yeah.
>> Anytime that God decides to take life, he can do that because he created it. That does not give us the ability to do that.
>> And with this, if you're listening to this, you're not familiar with this is that there was also not just punishment for the woman, but for the man as well. So, if you're just hearing this like, oh, why was it just for the No, no, no. It was also punishment for the man. This was just basically the test to see if something had happened.
>> Yeah, that's right. Let's keep on that. Um the point is that this idea that there is a set Christian orthodoxy on the issue of abortion
>> is just not rooted in scripture. We can have a honest debate about it. Pope Francis uh say more about that.
>> I just said ah do not pass do not collect 200 hours. We are we don't need to talk about this. We already mentioned the uniform uh
>> it's clear
>> testimony of of church history.
>> You were to come back and sit at this table and tell me you know James I'm pro-life and anti-abortion. Here's my theological argument. I I am here to listen and respect that opinion. I have I have dear friends who who are anti-abortion. All I'm asking is that for Christians who are pro-choice and who respect the bodily autonomy of women that we be given the space to make our theological argument because I think there is a lot of of biblical evidence to support that opinion.
>> So a couple he's going to go into these arguments. I'll just So you got to watch this. I I did debate team in high school. Here's what you got to watch out for. Uh the what people always say is whoever controls the terms wins the debate.
>> Yes.
>> So if you frame it in terms of bodily a So that's what people do is they'll smuggle in language that that also smuggles in assumptions. The bodily autonomy of women. Okay. That's actually not what we're talking about, man.
>> Because there's two bodies involved, not just one.
>> That's what you got to watch out for. There's two bodies involved, not just one. We're not talking about bodily autonomy. We're talking about you're saying you have the right over somebody else's
>> bodily autonomy. That's what happens when you take somebody else's life in uterero. All right, let's keep going.
>> What do you think is the biblical evidence to support the opinion of being proabortion?
>> So, one, you know, uh, in Genesis, God creates life by breathing life into the first human being, which we later call Adam. That life starts when you take your first breath. And that is actually the the the the mainline position in Judaism is that that's when life starts.
>> Awesome.
>> Okay. So appealing.
>> All right. You go you go.
>> Like appealing to Adam's creation to define when life begins. It's like using the burning bush to define laws botany and thermodynamics.
>> All right. There you go.
>> In the sense of those are it's a supernatural exception. It's not the norm and the pattern. Okay. And so I even like I say like it's just a general thing is hey we got to be careful about taking a supernatural exception in scripture and then saying all right and then this defines the pattern for the rest of scripture. Um that'd be number one. So Adam was not conceived. He was created uniquely from the dust.
>> Here's the that's the point. Adam was never a fetus.
>> He was never a fetus.
>> And that's what I'm saying is he's a supernatural exception. You can't then say oh therefore everything is like this. The other thing would be is that scripture teaches that human life does begin in the womb. Not at birth. I mean, even just a few places. Um, number one in Luke, um, when it talks about the baby leaping in Elizabeth's womb,
>> first person to ever worship Jesus.
>> First person to ever worship Jesus, unborn child. And the word that is used, baby breathos, is the same word that is used of infant and children.
>> Wow.
>> So, it doesn't distinguish. It's the same thing. Um, you obviously have texts like uh Psalm 139, Jeremiah where it says, "Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you." Um, but I also think a key thing here is from like the breath of life is a poetic image. And what's interesting is later in Ecclesiastes, we get that same kind of imagery. This what it says as you do not know the way the spirit or wind or breath comes to the bones in the womb of a woman with child.
>> So here he's trying to make the argument of, oh no, breath is what gives life. That doesn't happen until the baby is outside. Here it says that the breath comes to the baby while it is still in his mother's womb.
>> And so yeah. Yeah, he got I don't need anything had anything. He nailed it.
>> And he did say did he say that it was like the mainstream Judais like Judaism perspective? Is that is that true?
>> That I don't know anything about that.
>> It might be true today, but there's been variations. I mean like for example, we've got Pho who is an early Jewish rabbi who would have said abortion was wrong and kind of a thing. And so again, even if it's mainstream belief doesn't mean that it's right.
>> We're going Bible.
>> Yeah, Bible Bible Bible.
>> Let's keep going.
>> All right. Then if you think about it from a Christian perspective, what something interesting that Jesus does throughout his ministry is he is breaking first century norms about women um talking with women uh learning from women, having women lieutenants in his movement and this was something that was kind of unheard of in the first century. The longest conversation Jesus has with anybody in the whole Bible is with the Samaritan woman at the well. And so this this affirmation of of women as full and equal people is a huge part of the Jesus movement, especially the early church.
>> Pause.
>> First of all, we agree with his lessons.
>> Yeah,
>> that's that's really important. We totally agree with his lessons that Jesus did uh treat women as full and equal people. He did not equals but not equivalents. That's a whole different discussion, you know, but to totally agree. But let me just say like that's a quite a leap to go from Jesus had a long conversation with a woman one time. Therefore I that's quite a leap. I yeah literally I wrote down I didn't I think I had two bullet points and one was like yes
>> and it I guess just like yeah like you said I totally agree man and we we need to remember that too in terms of how Jesus treated women but then even going to the dedicay and other writings and the earliest Christians who are the closest to Jesus by the way than we are
>> did not then use that to then justify abortion.
>> Yes. So,
>> yes. Yeah. I just want to point out like um a I would just be like, "Yeah, man." But like Jesus forbade murder. That really this whole the whole discussion like is, you know, you can have a million emotional situations thrown out. And that stuff as Christians, we should care. We should weep with those who weep. We should be the ones that like that's the reason we give huge amounts of money at Lake Point. Uh crisis pregnancy centers, foster care and adoption, all the you know uh women who are victims of sexual trafficking. There's a reason we like do all out on that stuff. Uh, our sore ministry for kids with special needs. There's a reason we go out on stuff. So you can throw out all of the uh emotional things that'll pull you emotionally. Really, here's the only question. Is it murder?
>> That's the only question that matters. Is it murder? We didn't get to this ear, but it might be helpful to do it now. Is can I just briefly state like the historical Christian case in terms of like the reasoning of why we believe this is okay.
>> And I actually take this from Andrew Walker who adapted this from um Dave Beckwith um who wrote a book called Defending Life. So basically four premises. Number one, an unborn child is a member of the human species. So whatever is in the mother's womb, is it either living or dead? Well, it's living. Okay. Okay. Well, then if it's living, it's a living what?
>> Yeah.
>> It's a living human. So, an unborn child is a member of the human species. We gave texts already throughout the Bible in terms of where we see that life begins in the moon. That leads to point number two. It is morally wrong to take the life of an innocent member of the human species. Book of Exodus, you shall not murder. Proverbs 6:16-17. God hates the shedding of innocent blood. I mean, that's just like you got to feel the weight. He hates the shedding of innocent blood. Number three, abortion takes the life of a member of the human species, which leads to number four. Therefore, abortion is immoral. That's the case. Yeah,
>> it's that simple case.
>> And again, we we're we're going to move on, but we'll keep going back to
>> that all of this is but in the same way, um there's a reason the New Testament talks about and such were some of you. Yes.
>> But you were washed, you were cleansed. So what I always want to say and I just want to interject it to what like I Jan and I pray with women who have terminated pregnancies and they you have the grief that sometimes you know we'll pray with somebody in the lobby is unspeakable and what we always remind them is hey the death that most defines your life is not the death of your son or your daughter it's the death of the son of God that cleanses you from all sin.
>> There you go.
>> Yes.
>> And so you need to sleep really good tonight just knowing the father is pleased with you. So I wanted to get that in. Let's keep going.
>> That's right.
>> And then the last I think um story I would go to is the story of Mary.
>> Dude, this is hilarious.
>> Mary is probably my my favorite figure in the Bible. Um the mother of Jesus. And you know, she is um she's an oppressed peasant teenage girl living in poverty under an oppressive empire as a Jew. and she um she has a vision from God that she's going to give birth to a baby who's going to bring the powerful down from their thrones, going to scatter the the proud, who's going to send the rich away empty. I mean, this this revolutionary song that she sings, it's called the Magnificat. It's actually been banned by certain uh authoritarian regimes because it is so radical. But I say all this in terms in context of abortion because
>> before God um comes over Mary and and we have the incarnation,
>> God asks for Mary's consent.
>> No, he didn't. This
>> which is remarkable. I mean, go back and read this in in
>> I'm going to read it, by the way. We're pro consent, by the way.
>> The angel comes down and asks Mary if this is something she wants to do. And she says, "If it is God's will, let it be done. Let it be. let it happen. So to me that is a an affirmation in one of our most central stories that creation has to be done with consent. You cannot force someone to create. Creation is one of the most sacred acts that that um that we engage in as human beings. But that has to be done with consent. It has to be done with freedom. And and to me that is absolutely consistent with the ministry and life and death of Jesus.
>> All right. Pause. So, first of all, I just want to make very very clear all Christians should unequivocally uh is consent. Like that's like let me just But well, what people do on the internet is like but so you're saying so like honestly dude like Old Testament I I think that forcible rape should be a death penalty.
>> So let me just get that out there. Like I think so very very very proconsent. Um but this is a weird thing to say. Paul, why is it a weird thing to say?
>> Well, so he said go back and read it. So, I would love to, but before can we just stop and like this is when I read when I listen, this is probably the part that infur infuriated me the most. Like, do you really want to base your theology of abortion on the fact that Mary could have aborted the son of God?
>> Yeah.
>> That he could have killed the son of God 33 years before everybody else got a chance.
>> Is that really like what you want to base your theology of abortion on? But I can revisit that another time. So, let's actually go and read the text like he told us to. So, the angel said to her, "Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, I'm going to put some emphasis on words because I think you're going to see a pattern. You will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus." Shall it be a command? He will be great and will be called the son of the most high. And the Lord God will give him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever. And his kingdom there will be no end. And Mary said to the angel, "How will this be since I am a virgin?" And the angel answered her, "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. Therefore, the child will be born will be called holy, the son of the the son of God. And behold, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son, and this is the sixth month with her who was called barren. For nothing will be impossible with God."
>> You skipped the uh if it's okay with you, would this be okay with you?
>> Oh, no. I was literally going to stop there. So did you guys hear like any like place where God said hey would be okay with if it's okay
>> if it's okay. So like all these statements are firm this is going to happen or you shall do this. So
>> he just wild he just like literally made up a Bible
>> and then
>> that's wild.
>> Yeah. And then it does say and Mary said behold I am the servant of the Lord let it be to me according to your word. And the angel departed from her. So actually when I was thinking about this if anything this confirms our viewpoint which is she basically says I am going to be obedient. So yeah she in a sense did give consent to obey. So the question would be if she had not given consent what would that have been?
>> Sin. It would have been disobedience but never in any place of this you get any any hint of God saying hey as long as it's okay with you.
>> No. Yeah.
>> So, here's So, I just want Let me boil this down because at the end of the clip,
>> I think we're So, here's what I want point out. Here's a big idea. Zoom out for that dude James. Synagogue of Satan James.
>> All of these obscure passages with like loony interpretations are secretly about abortion, but you shall not murder isn't.
>> I like that's really you zoom out. That's what's going on. All these obscure passages that had this we, you know, secret uh interpretation that nobody's ever noticed before, those are about abortion, but you shall not murder isn't. That's your problem. There's your problem. Yeah.
>> Couple questions briefly for you, Pastor Josh, but why are you talking about this? This is a political issue. You're a pastor.
>> Yeah. So, what I would say is, no, no. People keep saying that the church is getting more political. And I'm like, no, no, the church is not getting political. Politics are getting spiritual. That's it's my little riff. I say it all the time because I get accused of this all the time. Church's getting political. Nope, it's not. Politics are getting spiritual. When the government moved past things like building roads and issuing driver's licenses and teaching math to things like redefining marriage, erasing gender, uh reframing abortion as quote unquote reproductive rights, and then indoctrinating everybody's kids into believing those things via the government school system, hey, the church didn't move. Politics did. And whenever whenever the government moves out of its lane and into the church's lane about things like morality, uh, definitions of life and marriage, it's the job of the church. We go like we could someday we should like super nerd out on like Kyperian sphere sovereignty, Abraham Kyper and sphere sovereignty, theology of societal arrangements. But whenever the government moves out of their lane and into the church's lane, it's the job of the church to like, "Hey man, get back in your lane or I'm going to have to put you in the dirt."
>> And that that's what's happening right now. Church is going, "Hey man, get back in your lane. You don't you don't define what life is, marriage is, gender is." No,
>> that's God's job. Get back in your lane and submit to the lordship of Jesus.
>> Here, here's one more. Wait, but uh Christians are supposed to be nice and you just called them uh pastor synagogue of sag.
>> Yeah. So, so I would just dude um Paul referenced it earlier. Uh Jesus said anyone who causes one of these little ones to sin, it would be better for him to have a millstone tied around his neck uh than to then to continue. So dude, when people accuse us of being clear, this is somebody who is publicly on the largest podcast in the world, uh, influencing Christians towards sin and not just sin, but sin that results in the the mass taking of innocent human life. That is not a moment for measured words. Let's be nice. No, no. That's a moment to be like, sit down. Shut up. And you you are resulting in people dying.
>> Yeah.
>> So that that so so if somebody's like, "Hey Josh, that's mean." No, no. What's mean is allowing someone to continue teaching things that if believed will result in death and people going to hell.
>> That's mean.
>> And it's biblical. By the way, even when you say a synagogue of Satan, if people don't realize, you're really just referring to a term that's in scripture.
>> Yeah. Sorry, that's a I'm quoting Revelation 3.
>> Yeah. And then also like if you read through the epistles and even look through Jesus where they get heated and they're not afraid to do things like this is when the flock is being attacked and misled. So even like in Galatians when false teachers are trying to lead them away around the issue of circumcision Paul literally says I wish they would just say Galatians 5 6 something like And so you see like scripturally anytime the flock is being misled, basically Christian leaders have the responsibility to rise up and speak very pointedly and call it out.
>> Yeah,
>> that's Carlos. That's why I asked to do this on podcast because again the number of people who sent that clip to me and it was people who like, hey, what do you think about this? They were confused.
>> And honestly, let me just like gently because there's a lot of pastors that watch this. Part of the reason that a lot of Christians are confused is because the pulpit have not been clear.
>> So like that's our job. Let's do our job.
>> Jude 1 vers3. Beloved, I found it necessary to write appealing to you to contend for the faith that was once and for all delivered to the saints.
>> That's it, man.
>> That's it. Before you finish this, I just want to point one other thing out about this guy. So um that clip went insanely viral. like insanely viral.
>> I think Joe Rogan said he should run for president.
>> He did say he should run for president, which is terrifying. What I want to point out, I went and scoped out this guy. First of all, I think he pastor a church of like 11 people. It's like I just you can just tell. That's a whole side note. Like this is a whole different podcast. Progressive Christianity uh grows social media platforms but shrinks churches. I'll just That is a thing.
>> Uh that is totally a thing. this guy like came on the scene preaching against Christian nationalism. He was like, "All these like these uh these politicians are trying to use the Bible to influence their uh their policy and that's evil Christian nationalism." Well, what I want to point out is he's preaching against Christian nationalism and then he's using obscure, incorrect, and loony interpretations of scripture to inform his public policy decisions.
>> So, you'll see this a lot. Progressive Christians are extremely politically active. Like way more politically active than conservative Christians. The the someday we should talk about this. The data around the political activity of progressive Christians vastly more politically engaged than conservative Christians which is really interesting whole different thing. But what you'll notice conservative or progressive Christians do is they do Christian nationalism for me but not for thee.
>> They constantly do that. So they accuse conservative Christians of you guys are doing Christian nationalism. You it's not fair for you to bring your personal beliefs into the public square. And then they'll walk out and they'll be like, "Well, Jesus was an immigrant, so we should have open borders.
>> Jesus fed the poor, so we should have, you know, unlimited welfare and USAD and universal basic income." Jesus, you I you saw this two years ago, tons of these statements from progressive Christians where they would talk about um uh Jesus makes a comment about Unix and we don't have I don't want to talk about this right now. He makes a comment about Unix and some people were made Unix and some people became Unix, you know, by choice, that kind of thing. And progressive Christians who were politically engaged pointed to those like, see, it's okay to be transgender. We should have affirming transgender laws. So, my point is the same dude that gets famous preaching against Christian nationalism goes on Joe Rogan and is like, "Hey, because of my beliefs about scripture, here's what the public policy should be. Christian nationalism for thee, uh, for me, but not for thee." Here we go.