November 20, 2025 Meeting of the Leander ISD Board of Trustees

Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Yeah. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Shle. Shle. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat up here. Heat up here. Heat. Heat.

Anna Smith >> here. >> Shade Fashikun >> here. >> Nikosi Nelson >> here. Trish Bod >> here. >> Paul Goautier >> here. >> Gloria Gonzalez Duckia here. >>

It is 6:15 p.m. and with a quorum of the board present, I call this meeting of the Lander ISD board of trustees to order. It is my pleasure to welcome Kaia Dodson, a student at Deer Creek Elementary to lead us in the pledges tonight. Kaia, whenever you're ready.

Please stand and join me in saying the pledge of allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Please remain standing for the Texas pledge. Honor the Texas flag. I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible. If you'll join me in a moment of silence, please. Thank you.

Thank you, Ka, for leading us in the pledge tonight. Now, board members, we will now go to the oath of office. And I'd like to invite Laura Marquez to the front to take the oath of office for place six on the Land Lander ISD board of trustees.

I, Laura Marquez, do solemnly swear and affirm that I will faithfully execute the duties of the office of school board trustee for Leander Independent School District of the state of Texas, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States and of this state. So help me God.

All right, Laura now sits on the dis. Up next, we are excited to shine our spotlight on learning on Deer Creek Elementary School. Come on down, Colts.

Whenever y'all are ready, take it away.

All right. Good evening, Madame President, Dr. Garing, and distinguished board members. My name is Matt Caukins and I have the privilege of working alongside the most dedicated and talented staff representing our incredible Deer Creek community and especially kids such as these. I appreciate this opportunity for you to give us um the opport the the the floor for these kids to share their voice. At Deer Creek, we've been working hard to foster empowerment by providing increased agency and access in student learning experiences. We are working hard to teach our students to know themselves, what strengths they have, what struggles they encounter, and how they can best figure out how to show their growth and learning.

Uh, I'm Allison Brown. I'm the assistant principal at Deer Creek. And, um, in my role, I get to see all of the different um, student interests that we have on our campus. Um and that um has led us to exploring a way to um dive into that through innovation lab um which is uh something that every one of our kindergarten through fifth grade. So, every kinder through fifth grade student gets to participate in um every two weeks and it is run over here by the uh fabulous Miss Matt Suda and her um our Quest teacher and her instructional aid um Miss Hodinger who is a former uh Deer Creek student as well. Um, so yes, we're very lucky to have them. And in that time when all of our kids go, they are teaching them and building into the graduate profile um, which is just allows them that space and that time that they get to do. Um, and then they're teaching them different skills um, STEMbased and how um, things that they can learn there in class with Miss Matsuda then to take back to their class. Right? So that things that they get to use, how I can show my learning that in different ways that they get to do um because they learned with her.

Um, also this has been a huge campuswide effort with all of our teachers supporting this effort because they helped us just from building which seems simple a master schedule to um, you know rearranging their schedule so that all of these kids can go um and learn these new skills and then giving them the space to share their learning when they come back. So, these are student ambassadors um at Deer Creek and they're going to focus on um we're focusing on empowering students today. And so, I'm going to start with McKay and he is going to um start us off today.

Multiplechoice star type questions or any multiplechoice questions have pluses and deltas to it. A plus it's and it it's fast and you don't have to put in a hard effort to make it look nice. Adults of multiple choice questions would be that it's boring. And honestly, I like to do fun things. If it's a multiple choice question, I might draw it out and if I can't find the right answer, I'll guess about the one that's close to my answer. Students deserve a way to show work and learning in a fun way. So, this evening, we'll show you different ways to show mastery.

Hello, my name is Claire and my name is Ka and our video demonstrates how we can use little bits to show weathering, erosion, and deposition. This project can empower us because it gives us a chance to express our learning in a more fun, meaningful, and creative way. Many students find the multiple choice simple because they usually don't really have to think about the question and can just guess with little bits. We had to think critically and creatively to create the final product. We had to think about which bits to use, where to put each one, and how to create the different models. Star formatted questions can be classified as boring and can encourage complex thinking.

Here are the bits that we used. The fan circuit shows the weathering and the wheel circuit acts like a conveyor belt and shows the water moving which is erosion then dropping it off to make deposition.

Hello everybody. Our way of showcasing student empowerment and learning is by using stop motion animations. To do this you take a picture of an object, then move the object a little bit. Take another picture and repeat this process multiple times until the app has enough content to make an animated film. This style of learn work impacts our learning because it lets us think creatively and critically. We have to think about what we need to say and then could be creative in how we show our learning. This tool can give students chances to use what they know and turn it into amazing things, which also helps teachers understand how their students are doing. Stopotion is a great program to use, and we have made one for you to view. Erosion is when a river comes and carves out a mountain. It can turn it into a canyon. Deposition is when those eroded pieces fall into the river and it drops them off at the riverbank.

Hello everyone. I am Saffron and I'm Saji. We used music lab jam session which is a fun tool where you can program and code your own music track. First we took the teak questions and answered it in a paragraph. After this, we used the help of AI to generate lyrics to match the beat of our song and the meaning of our answer. Then we made the melody and tune of our song by programming codes to get the sounds. This empowered our learning because it is a chance to show our skills and incorporate more graduate profile in our strategies instead of the regular star multiple choice format. We think this tool is a fun way for students to express themselves into their creativity. So check this out.

Windscrew them all around. Pick them up off the ground and drop them down. New land for can be found. Sand canyons deltas too. Water flows sand moving pieces across the land. Rain blow the sediment creating landscapes where they are weathering erosion deposition working like a earth breaking weaving dropping down amazing landforms all around changing every day in a natural weathering way is changing fascinating as you can see we started with a star type question and made it so much more, including a movie, a circuit project, and even a song. This can show full understanding of learning because it's so much more than just filling in a bubble. It's making an electronic circuit. It's making a movie using nothing but pictures and bringing objects to life. And it's coding music to make an original song. It empowers us to think critically and creatively, all of which are ways of learning that multiple choice cannot show. While we don't need this all the time, we hope that our teachers and staff will allow us to have more empowered learning. Thank you for allowing us to present this evening.

Thank you so much, dear Creek Colts. We really appreciate y'all being here and telling your story, but we need y'all to hold on for a second because we want to get a picture with y'all. And parents, if you'd like, you can come up here and get a picture if you um take a picture if you'd like. Thank you so much, Derek Creek. We really appreciate y'all coming out here tonight.

Um, next board members, it's going to be 4B, which is another special recognition. And I'd like to invite our chief communication officer, Christina Hardy, to introduce tonight's special recognition.

Good evening, Madame President, board of trustees, Dr. Gearing. Thank you so much um for the ability to do a wonderful showcase that we have prepared for you today. Today we have a special presentation and in recognizing Leander ISD and our staff for its emergency response during the July floods. At this time, I'd like to invite Par Sanchez, the Travis County Executive, as well as her team, Lynn Caffy and Anna Martinez, as well as members of the board. If you could line up here along this side with your backs toward um our chiefs here. Um and um Dr. gearing, please, if you can line up this way. As well as our um folks who will be recognized. We're going to we're going to um have our folks recognized over here to this side and then we're going to direct our audience that way right here.

Madame President, board of trustees, um I'm Par Sanchez and I'm the county executive of Travis County Health and Human Services and I had to come out here even if it was storming or how far it was from my house. I had to come out here and tell you how special your school district and your teachers, students, PTA, and staff are. It's it's it was just amazing that such a tragedy. It showed us the beautiful heart that your staff has in your community. Somebody told me, I think it was Madame President Smith told me earlier today that it's your community that comes first. and your staff really showed that with actions. Uh it's not just words. Um we we needed a place to set up as an emergency response team and you all opened your doors. It was Danielson Middle School and Highel. I think it was also Stacy uh oh sorry Jim plane uh and heel and Danielson and it was not only the space it came with an amazing amount of support from your people.

First and foremost, let me say that Miguel, Miguel, if you can come down, Miguel, uh, the ISD emergency management team member, uh, leader. Uh, I've got I'm not sure exactly what your title is, but I you must be the the leader. Uh it was so refreshing to see somebody that deals with emergency be very calm, professional, very structured, compassionate, and just with a can do attitude. He said, "Come in. What do you need?" And then along came Principal Erica, Dr. Erica, please come down. Erica Cruz, and she did the same thing. And they just were this phenomenal team where he said, "Where is the stuff?" She said, "You can get it from here, whatever they need." And he had, I can tell he's got a lot of training in emergency management. He really had everything that we needed and asked us how we wanted it and gave us a lot of recommendations of how we can set up and and which room to be in and how it would would flow. Um, it was a cand do attitude, very generous with their time and their equipment. Thank you very much. Don't don't walk away.

Um, I'm going to call the others to please step up. Kelly Marco from the PTA. My team at HHS and I were stationed at uh Danielson Middle School and the PTA is you all don't call them PTAs anymore, do you? You do. Okay. PTA brought us fresh coffee and snacks every morning. And it was just so nice to get there and fuel up with that caffeine because it was going to be a long day. And it was just very, very thoughtful and very caring. Thank you very much.

Um, and then if the others can come up, uh, we've got, uh, so the principal from Jim Plain, Emily, was not able to be here. So, Angela Hodes, is going to accept her little gift for her, and she's also going to accept uh, our gift for Donna Lewis, who's the principal at Highell Elementary. And then there was Monica Dea Garza Connis and the principal from Baghdad Elementary. And then there's Kelly Marco. Oh, we got her. Oh, yes. PTA. PTA. Uh, coffee and snacks. And, um, Chuck Wright. Um, did I get everybody? I think so. There was seven, right? So, um, we were making a list of who was just amazing and everybody was amazing. But, uh, Ross Stevens, our division director over over weatherization and house report said, "You've got to recognize Chuck. Chuck was amazing. We needed maps to be able to tell where our people who have the greatest needs are, and he made us maps. We needed science, and he helped us." And I mean, uh, he just went on and on about how how just helpful you were, Chuck. So, thank you very much.

Um, Madame President, trustees, you've got shining stars. The your teachers did were off for the for the summer and they insisted on being there. They asked, "What can we do?" All of these people asked, "What can we do?" And the teachers came and they manned the care center for the kids just in case families brought kids that could entertain them while the parents got assistance, the PTA with snacks and coffee. And then the teachers, they kept thinking, what else can we do? They just wanted to be able to be there to help. And then they started making calls to all their families to check in on them. And some of them went to the families and took them a care package. I we were just blown away by the hospitality, the professionalism, the compassion, the cand do attitude and the love that you all had for your community and your open door and your open arms to us who were here to see how we can help them. So, thank you very much.

Our judge Brown did send a proclamation and uh I'm sorry he couldn't be here, but he did send this proclamation. If it's okay, may I read it?

Whereas on July 5th, 2025, the Sandy Creek area of Travis County was struck by devastating floods that displaced families, damaged and destroyed homes, and challenged our community in unimaginable ways. And whereas in the midst of this crisis, Leander Independent School District stepped forward without hesitation, opening their doors and their hearts to support their neighbors in need. And whereas throughout every stage of the emergency response, the Leandra ISD team demonstrated unwavering collaboration, compassion, and service by providing multiple district facilities and schools to Travis County for use as emergency sites and ensured transportation to and from both the volunteer reception center and the Danielson Flood Resource Center, helping connect people with critical resources. support and compassion they needed. And whereas their actions during the Sandy Creek floods exemplified leadership, teamwork, humanity, and showing what it means to care for one another when it matters most. And whereas Leander ISD's dedication and gen generosity brought comfort, stability, and hope to many during an incredibly difficult time, reminding us that we are strongest when we stand together. Now therefore, be it proclaimed that I, the Travis County Judge, on behalf of a grateful community, do hereby recognize and honor Leander Independent School District for their outstanding partnership, compassion, and unwavering commitment to the people of Travis County during the July 5th, 2025 Sandy Creek floods. Their willingness to serve, their kindness, their spirit of how can we help made all the difference. And for that we extend our deepest gratitude. In witness thereof, I have here un here unto set my hands and cause the seal of Travis County. Andy Brown, County Judge.

When I hand this to Miguel, my compatriate. This is a copy of the proclamation. Madam President, you all received the official proclamation and uh Anna and Lynn have just a small gift of appreciation for from us to you. Um Chuck, can you display the one that's in the box? I hope you will with pride display that somewhere in your all's office and remember just how wonderful you are and how impactful you were in people's lives. I think they want a picture on this side.

Hannah, Lynn, you all in front. I get down there. I may never make it back up. Yeah, look right here.

Next is a citizen comments portion of our agenda. The board appreciates the community's engagement in tonight's meeting and the valuable input provided through citizens comments. In coordinates with Leander ISD board policy BEED local, the presiding officer may make adjustments to the public comment procedures in order to accommodate large numbers of individuals wishing to address the board. This evening we have 37 individuals wishing to address the board wish sorry 37 individuals sign up to speak. In addition to a lengthy list of topics for the board to consider the normally the board allows each speaker and public comment up to 90 seconds for his or her presentation due to the high number of individuals will be speaking this evening. I'm adjusting that time to 60 seconds per speaker so that we may hear from everyone and have time remaining to conduct the business of the district. Before I invite the first speaker to line up, we will watch a short introductory video.

Hello, my name is Devin Kim. I'm a junior at Rouse High School. The district and the board of trustees are the local government body responsible for serving the educational needs of all school children like me and my friends here in Leander Independent School District. Their mission is to cultivate each individual student while creating a safe and supportive environment. The board is now taking up the citizen comment agenda item. This is dedicated time during the meeting to hear from the whole community and the entire LISD family is listening. The district believes the Leander family thrives when we ensure a welcoming, safe, and caring environment. To our speakers, before you speak, we hope you have read guidelines specified in board operating procedures and beed local. The board wants to hear from everyone. Please be mindful of your conduct and an example you are choosing to set when presenting complinks information. Remember that school children of all ages may participate in board meetings either by watching them online or you might even see some of us in the audience. Still remember that there are other ways you can communicate with the board. You can send them an email or just tell them that you would like to chat sometime. When the board president calls your number, remember, watch the timer and focus your remarks to the time allotted. We know it can be hard, but please conclude your comments when you hear the chime.

Speakers 1 through 10, please form a line so you're ready to approach the microphone when your number is called. So, speaker number one, whenever you're ready, please come up to the mic. just on my first word. Oh, perfect. My name is Connor Adam. I'm a student at Glenn High School and I'm here I'm going to come out of the gate swing and I'm here to urge the board of trustees to follow the example of Round Rock ISD and to fight the suit filed by Attorney General Ken Paxton. The mandatory posting of the Ten Commandments in every classroom is a violation of the establishment clause of the very first amendment in our US Constitution, stating that the government shall make no law, no law respecting the establishment of any religion. Not only should you not be required to post them by the state, but it shouldn't even be an option. We all know that if it was any other religion, say if it was the religious pillars of Islam, people would be fighting this instantly, rioting in the streets. If my efforts haven't been in vain, I believe the board of trustees has received multiple emails from other fellow Glenn High School students urging for the same thing that I am. We even have another speaker here today. You'll have the pleasure of hearing from speaker 4, who is also here from Glenn High School, to speak on the very same topic. Once again, I urge do not go down without a fight. Get this case overturned for its own constitutionality.

Thank you, Speaker number one. Speaker number two and speaker number three did not sign in or check in, I'm sorry. So we'll go with speaker number four. My name is Sahana Chundran, a student at Glenn High School. As a district board members, we pride ourselves on inclusion and free expression. However, the Ten Commandments legislation is an impediment to that freedom. As a student in this district, I urge you to continue fighting against AG Paxton's lawsuit for the sake of your constituency. LISD staff, parents, and students. Landmark decisions like Engle versus Vital established a precedent in public schools to hold our constitutional freedoms above religious doctrine. Schools are meant for education and unity, and enforcing beliefs of any kind inhibits that. Every minute that you stand against this lawsuit, you stand beside the interests of your students. We are taught to speak our minds in the schools that you lead. So, as I speak, I hope that you will listen because right now, it is up to us to stand for what is right. And I urge you, board members, to make the right decision. Thank you.

Thank you, speaker number four. Speaker number five. Good evening. The simple truth is that Steiner Rancher Elementary.

Okay, hold on. Start it over.

Oh my goodness. And we were making our own music just like the kids were. All right, I think we're okay now. We're not I'm not echoing anymore. All right, go ahead. Now, speaker number five, start over.

No worries. Good evening. The simple truth is that Steiner Ranch Elementary's sustained academic excellence is entirely due to our dedicated teachers. They are the district's most valuable asset. We urge you to honor their success by protecting the supportive environment they have built over the years. This is not just sentiment. Our A rating is the direct result of staff longevity and teamwork. Led by an incredible principal that is always searching for ways to improve. Their consistency guarantees highquality instruction every single day. Our teachers and admin are determined to find solutions to help every child succeed no matter how difficult the situation. When teachers stay for years, expertise and institutional knowledge are retained. This improves teaching and helps every student succeed, especially those in special education who rely on established routines and trusting relationships to thrive. This staff is not just meeting educational targets, they are defining them. Their continued presence is the greatest assurance of future academic excellence. Thank you.

Thank you, speaker number five. Speaker number six, and before you begin, speaker 6, can I please get uh speakers 11 through 16 to line up, please? Whenever you're ready, speaker number six. I'm a Cypress parent here again in support of LISD neighborhood schools that are proposed for closure here or in the near future. I've been at many of these and several workshops and I have heard members of the board express that they don't want to frustrate or anger the community and that they have the awareness that they have done this by how this process was commenced in the quality of the data and decision-making to date. I'm sorry to report we're still frustrated and confused and now we are developing whiplash. Please help us understand today how we can move forward as a community. Know that we are still deeply invested whether in person, virtual, or just here in spirit, and we're prepared to dig in over the long term to get the district back to thriving in all aspects. The underfunding of Texas public schools and pushing families to other options is likely not going to resolve anytime soon. You have a community here that cares about this issue as much as you do and you can choose to bring us together in meaningful ways. From letterw writing campaigns to piloting solutions, we've got your back if you work to do the right thing for our kids. Thank you.

Thank you. Speaker six. Speaker number seven. As a community, we all want the same thing. Strong schools, supported teachers, and opportunities that help every child thrive. It's about giving families flexibility, strengthening our schools, and attracting new students and resources. When new students come in, funding follows. During the summer, I handed Dr. Garing letters from 35 students that would be out of district transfers into LISD since out of district transfers was approved that again by myself. Can you imagine what we can do as a team? We're here to help. Let's give an off Let's give open enrollment a chance. It's not a risk, but as an opportunity to grow our numbers and an opportunity to build a stronger district, support our schools, and invest in a future where every family feels confident. Enrollment, open enrollment is a logical and cost-effective strategy employed throughout the district to increase enrollment. Steiner Ranch is the best location to benefit from open enrollment. And PS, I truly hope you guys take the opportunity to read the 2,658 letters that we dropped off at your office yesterday. Thank you.

Speaker number seven. Speaker number eight did not check in, so we're going to go with speaker number nine. Good evening. My name is Adam and I'm a proud parent of Steiner Ranch Elementary School students. I'm here because closing Steiner Ranch Elementary is not in the long-term best interest of Leander ISD. The district's own data shows Santa Ranch is not a financial outlier. Its cost per student variance is modest and can be corrected through enrollment growth, especially through open enrollment. Steiner Ranch is the only LISD campus positioned to attract students from Lake Travis ISD into our Vandergri feeder pattern. That aligns directly with the board's resolution to pursue new revenue opportunities. If we close SR, that opportunity disappears forever. Closing S sur would also create long-term risks, increasing traffic, safety concerns, loss of walkable neighborhood schools and diminish student experiences. Charter schools, private schools, and even Lake Travis ISD will take advantage of this disruption, and property values, and therefore the district's tax base will decline when an A-rated community school is removed. This is short-term savings for long-term pain. It's like selling a car you own to keep the one you are leasing. Thank you.

Thank you, Speaker number nine. Speaker number 10. Board members, I'm asking you to please vote to keep our schools open. The plan to close our schools will cause huge problems for students who have special needs. In our district, we have 7,000 students who have IEPs. More than half of these plans are with students in elementary schools. The IEP is a promise the schools make to give them the right education they need. The law states, Anna, the law states, "Students move uh students that move to a new school must be given the same help the very first day. The district staff is already working hard, but you are forcing them to close campuses, reduce teachers and school staffing, alter attendance boundaries, and move 3,500 promises in just 8 months. That is impossible. When the staff can't keep up, it means the district is breaking its promise to thousands of kids. If the district breaks this promise, we face two big penalties. Lawsuits. Thousands of families will have the right to file formal complaints against the district. Huge bills. We will be forced to pay compensatory.

Thank you, speaker number 10. Speaker number 11. Good evening board members. My name is Tanya Lavell. I am Mont Ali right here. Uh, thank you for your continued work during this challenging time. As you have hopefully felt and seen over this past many months, our community wants to be part of the solution. We're ready to partner with you to protect the quality of education in LSD. But right now, the proposals around reduced staffing and possible school closures are genuinely confusing for many families, including mine. We're struggling to understand how these decisions support strong learning environments or reflect the diverse needs of our campuses. We know the district must be financially responsible and we believe that we can be that that can be done without diminishing the educational experience of our kids. That's why clarity and transparency are so important. When decisions are clearly explained with data, rationale, long-term goals, our community can engage constructively and help find sustainable solutions. We also ask for thoughtful long range planning. For example, reducing schools in the south won't ease overcrowding in the north, and families want to see a district-wide strategy that reflects real growth patterns.

Thank you, speaker number 11. Speaker number 12. Hi, we appreciate the board attempting to deepen their understanding of our district's current situation. A decision appears to be looming on the horizon. We are still waiting on elaboration of where the numbers of how each campus closure will save the district truly comes from. What will potentially increase transportation cost? What happens to the closed buildings? Using them for other uses will not save the district money based on the functional capacity presentation earlier this fall. How do you decide what administrators get to continue working in our neighborhood? If closure is inevitable, why are we not having deeper conversations on what schools will be best suited for closure? We appreciate you having the tough conversations and hope to learn more tonight and in the coming weeks. We need leaders who make decisions so we do not continue to live under such a dark cloud of uncertainty. Thank you.

Thank you, speaker number 12. Speaker number 13. And before you begin 13, can I please get uh speakers 17 through 22 to please line up whenever you're ready? Number 13. Hi. I'd like to recap some of the last six months of speeches for the new board member. Cypress and Steiner Ranch parents seriously disagree with the inflated denominator in the low enrollment calculations. The inflated denominator creates the appearance of low enrollment even when smaller elementary schools are viable, coste effective, and financially efficient. The entire pursuit seems arbitrary to many parents, leading a group of dedicated Cypress parents to publish five newsletters with deep research into actual school capacities and true long-range educational best practices. Using historical satellite footage, the research from these parents proved that Cypress Elementary would require many portable buildings to serve as few as 700 students, never mind the capacity claimed by Leander ISD last spring, which was much higher. I have a lot more to say. Um, many Cypress parents have talked to upper level staff from other school districts and schoolboard members throughout Texas, still not understanding why Leander ISD wants to consider closing schools. Parents understand that we must continue writing to the governor and state representative.

Thank you. Speaker 13. Speaker number 14 did not check in. So we will go with speaker number 15. Hello. We're here today to hold this board accountable. The data does not support this closure. The fiscal logic does not support this closure. The human cost is unacceptable. We need answers to these facts. Why the fiscal waste of closing and leaving an empty, newly renovated facility. Why the illogic of dismantling a high performing school when open enrollment can save it? Why the moral failure of destroying a vibrant, successful, and thriving community asset built over two decades? The magic of S sur, the human dedication, the collective achievement is not transferable. Please, board of trustees, choose stability over disruption. Choose long-term vision over short-term cuts. Do not choose to extinguish the heart of our neighborhood. Thank you.

Thank you. Speaker number 15, speaker number 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21. Did not check in. Just double checking there. Nope, not in the audience. Okay. Speaker number 22. And then can we please get speakers 23 to 28 to line up please? Hi. The facts surrounding the proposed closure of Steiner Ranch Elementary deserve a transparent examination before the community and the public. We must address the process itself because the board and the district's position throughout the deliberation has been defined by chaos and cons and inconsistency. The wavering from we can't close these schools. We need a resolution to we can close two schools and the res resolution not providing defined guidelines has given this community profound procedural whiplash. This back and forth has created a devastating false sense of hope only to have the hope repeatedly dashed. We understand this situation is complex, but the constant shifting of the district's guidance severely hinders our ability to participate meaningfully. The lack of clear, consistent data creates unnecessary community exhaustion. This pattern effectively damages the public's competence necessary for these major decisions. We ask that the district and the board provide clear final guidance to restore the integrity of this process. Rebuild tr.

Thank you. Speaker number 22. Thank you. Now we'll have speaker number 23. Please come up. Hello and good evening. My name is Alexander Miles. I'm here to address the board on the subject of the closure of Steiner Ranch Elementary. I myself have had the privilege of moving back to the area with my family after actually going through the entire course of elementary school, middle school, and high school with Leander. It was a time whenever we were opening schools and we saw the just opportunity and possibilities. It was a time of growth and a time of great success. We saw these schools flourish. So going backwards and closing a school like Steiner Ranch Elementary not only represents a withdrawal but a rippling effect of negative outcomes for our students, for our homes, for everything that we had grown and built. I think that going backwards will ultimately harm all the progress that we've made thus far is a step in the wrong direction. So that is my piece on that. I appreciate your time. Thank you.

Thank you. Speaker 23. Speaker 24. Speaker number 25 did not check in. We'll go with speaker number 26, please. Since May, we have been told that difficult decisions must be made based on clear data, fiscal responsibility, and strategy. So, let's scrutin scrutinize the data. First, the misuse of taxpayer dollars. Steiner Ranch Elementary is a recently renovated facility. Yet, the board is currently considered closing a building that taxpayer money is has poured into and is still paying for. You cannot justify investing significant capital into a campus only to shut it. This is fiscal waste, plain and simple. Why would the board accept a penalty of a multi-year vacancy and maintenance cost on a state-of-the-art building while leaving older, less updated facilities open? Second, academic metrics. We are being asked to dismantle a model of success. We are facing a proposal to close a school with higher enrollment and an A rating. With student achievement and experience are truly the goal, the data demands you to preserve Steiner Ranch. The data also suggests that the promising savings from combining schools is minimal, meaning we are Thank you.

Thank you, speaker number 26. Speaker number 27. And before you begin, can I go ahead and get speakers 29 through 37 to go ahead and line up whenever you're ready? Speaker 27. Good evening. I figured I would try something different tonight because you have heard a whole lot of the same speeches from all of us and honestly, we're tired of giving them. So here's my question. If the superintendent is one of the final four candidates for another district, should he really be the one steering the ship on school closures? From the outside, it looks like a lot like someone packing up the moving van while still giving directions on what furniture the rest of us should keep. And what makes it even stranger is that he has spent the last year banging the drum about how stable Leander ISD is, how strong the future is here, how we all need to stay the course. yet he is venturing out of state to look for another place to work. If the district is truly as stable as he insists, why is he looking for the exit? And then there's the timing. Summer, holiday season, basically every moment when parents are distracted, exhausted, and running on caffeine and prayer. If you wanted low engagement, you nailed it. If you wanted trust, this is how you how how you build it. Steiner Ranch Elementary is strong, stable, and part of what makes this community go. Thank you.

Speaker 27. Speaker number 28. Speaker number 28. Hi, I'm here to speak in defense of the IB program at Vandergri. I know I'm not alone. Mary parents feel the same way. We are tired of getting no clear explanation of why IB is being cut at VHS. We keep hearing that enrollment is declining. Yet the data I've received directly from the IB staff and from my own student show the the opposite. I've shared this data with you multiple times and with the open enrollment plus Lake Travis not having any IB option. Enrollment is likely to grow not shrink. We are also told that moving IB to Leander High School makes it makes it accessible to all students. But this is simply not true for families in the four-point area. My younger children will not relocate, will not leave their friends or endure a one-hour commute. That is not equitable access. We want clarity, open communication, and decisions baked by real and transparent data. Right now, we are not seeing that. This is not the student center experience that this claim to prioritize.

Thank you, speaker number 28. Speaker 29 did not check in, so we're going to go with speaker number 30, please. I'm going to pick up where 26 left off. We are creating chaos for families without even solving the financial problem we set out to fix. Third, there is a procedural failure. We still lack a solid plan for the future of SR. There is no tenant, no guaranteed purpose for the empty building and no clear structure for the displaced staff. A new long-range planning report hasn't even been presented. We are being asked to trust a process that has no destination. This failure is clearest in open enrollment. You just voted to implement this logical lowcost tool next year to help boost numbers. SR being the most desirable and accessible location in Steiner Ranch has the highest potential for success using open enrollment. So why implement a proven solution only to potentially kill it before it can work? Why implement the cure only to refuse to give it in time to save the patient? to sideline the most viable marketdriven solution proves that this decision is based on something other than logic and strategy. Thank you.

Thank you. Speaker number 30. Speaker number 31, please. Hello again, Sher Fulmer, Cypress parent. Um before I get started, I just wanted to thank the board and the hiring committee for hiring Principal Gomez. It's been a very long six months for our community and having Principal Gomez has been just a a breath of fresh air. So, thank you. Over the past six months, we've listened closely to the district's presentations on demographics, legislation, and budget pressures. We fully recognize the need to balance our finances, but we're asking you to do that without closing neighborhood schools or cutting essential services. Actions that will only push more families to alter alternative schools and deepen our enrollment and funding challenges. Financial responsibility and strong neighborhood schools can coexist. A one-sizefits-all staffing model simply doesn't reflect the reality of our campuses. Neither the undercrowded nor our overcrowded neighbors to the north. Our campuses differ in student populations, demographics, resources, and need for special programs. We urge the board to choose a better path. Commit to strategic long-term planning that accounts for shifting enrollment in elementary through high school. Avoid blanket staffing cuts that harm campuses unevenly.

Thank you, Speaker number 31. Speaker number 32. But even if the numbers were conclusive, and they are clearly not, there is a dimension of value that is irreplaceable. We must recognize that the culture and community of S sur are not interchangeable assets. This school is defined by a camaraderie that has been cultivated over decades, anchored by a respected principal who has served our community for nearly 20 years. That stability creates a powerful safety net for our students, particularly for those in special education who rely on consistency. The longevity of our staff creates a safe environment that guarantees student success, making Steiner Ranch Elementary a leader and how to support how to support all students from all backgrounds. Our teachers possess an unwavering commitment to finding solutions for every student, regardless of the challenge they face. They refuse to let any obstacle or difficulty define a child's potential. When you talk about breaking our school apart, you are not just moving facilities. You are dismantling a unique and irreplaceable ecosystem that takes a generation to build and only one vote to eliminate. Thank you.

Thank you, speaker number 32. Speaker number 33. Last time I spoke about uh the hard work that many of our kids and teachers work to regain stability after early COVID years. Now I'd like to speak about the what threatens our stability to move forward. Texas's newest ESA program uh begins in 2026 27 school year shifting public dollars uh for to private options. Families are already weighing those choices. In this moment, the strategy should be retention over reduction. Strengthening neighborhood schools, not closing them. A closure doesn't make us more efficient. It makes us less competitive when parents will have more options than ever. And as we've seen the strong neighborhood schools produce, Vandergrift High School, which is fed directly from San Ranch Elementary, just won the 202425 Director's Cup. recognized statewide for its excellence. The achievement sts uh starts in elementary classrooms like ours. Closing this school now would undermine the very foundation of its success. But with creativity and collaboration, we can choose a solution that protects our kids, preserve trust, and keep families here exactly where they want to be. Thank you.

Thank you. Speaker number 33. Speaker number 34. In uncertain times, the most important thing a school district can do is maintain flexibility and keep options open. Over the past few months, we've heard discussions about what enrollment number should trigger a small school model and then another number that would trigger potential consolidation. And yet, at the October 30th meeting, we heard a board member express concern that schools could become too big. We have to be very careful here. If we insist on Goldilock schools that are not too small and not too big, we're designing a system that can't succeed in a world where enrollment is shifting. The only sustainable strategy is a flexible model that can absorb change, not one that collapses when the numbers move. Meanwhile, private and charter schools continue to grow, and they actively market their smaller size as a competitive advantage. If we don't choose to do this, we will lose our flexibility. Keep schools open keeps options open.

Thank you. Speaker number 34. Speaker number 35 did not check in, so we're going to go with speaker number 36. Hello, I'm Christina. I have three kids in LSD and I know you guys have been hit a lot. So, I wanted to try to inspire you guys and I wrote a poem instead. So before you close Steiner Ranch, I'm asking you to please delay. This building is not just a statistic. It's where children spend their day. Please try open enrollment first. Let families fill those seats. Give time to test new pathways before calling this complete. Because a school is more than walls and desks. It's where confidence begins. Where shy kids find their voices and where lonely kids find their friends. So let's try every option. explore every single door. We owe our children's futures on let's try again, not never more. Thank you.

Thank you, speaker number 36. Speaker number 37, just checking, did not check in. And that concludes our citizen comments for tonight. Uh board members, we will now move to consent agenda items. Do I have any motions related to consent agenda items? I move that the board approve the consent agenda items as presented.

Second. A motion from Gloria. A second from Sha. All in favor. Seven eyes. Motion passes. Next we will I don't know why I did that. Next we will head to the superintendent report.

Thank you, Madam President. very excited to bring you great news again from the state UIL marching band competition. Uh CPHs led the way at the 5A level. The Cedar Park High School Wolfpack had a great headline from 6 to 7 as Cedar Park earned their seventh consecutive state championship. Sorry.

Uh we are very excited also that Rouse High School was awarded their third consecutive silver medal in the 5A UIL state marching band contest. Uh an additional shout out to finalists from Leander High School who made sixth place in Glenn High School who also qualified for the state competition. I said this in our pathways and possibilities event last month, but this is now the second year in a row that

We've sent all six of our comprehensive high schools to the state level. It truly shows that we have one of the best marching band and music education programs in the state of Texas. And so, congratulations to Cedar Park High School, to Rouse High School, to Leander High School, to Glenn High School as well.

We're very excited that last week Vandergrift High School beat Westlake High School 16-4 in a very close competition, and that progressed them to the area round. They are currently playing at the Texas State UFC stadium. Um, they started at 7:00 p.m. So, they just underway versus Brandeise High School. And so, we wish them all the best as they continue on their march through the area round competition.

Also excited, uh, for Cedar Park High School football. They defeated the Tyler Lions last week 50 to 43 to progress to their area round. Um, they face Frisco Wakeland tomorrow night at 7 p.m. at Waco Midway Panther Stadium. So, all the best to our Cedar Park High School football students.

Now, what about those Cedar Park High School volleyball students? Progressed all the way through the playoffs, and they will be competing for the state championship on Saturday at the Curtis Cowwell Center in Garland, Texas at 1:00 p.m. So, if you can make your way up to Garland, we urge you to go and support our Cedar Park High School volleyball players. Outstanding performances.

We're also very excited, uh, this week to be able to, uh, reopen the Don 2 Performing Arts Center, um, after its, uh, refurbishing. We had a great turnout, um, at the arts center at Leander High School, one of the district's two performing arts centers. Um, we want to give a huge shout out to our community for approving the May 2023 bond, uh, that allowed this project to be possible. We had performances at this inaugural opening of our allies elementary choir from all 30 of our elementary schools, our Vista Ridge saxophone quartet, and the Leandra High School Blue Bells. We were also very honored to have members of the two family in attendance. Events like this are really a true collaboration between our facilities department, our fine arts department, and our school and community relations department.

We also have construction scheduled for the South Pack at Cedar Park High School beginning in summer of 2026. This is our, uh, elementary choir from all 30 of our elementary schools that performed. And of course, we had to have a ribbon cutting. The pack has brand new seats throughout the auditorium, as well as new projectors, completely new lighting, and then a new acoustic shell as well.

A great tradition in Leander ISD is our Thanksgiving lunches, uh, during this week before the Thanksgiving break. And so, we were excited, uh, to have many of us at Lark Elementary today, uh, serving turkey. My dog is going to love me tonight when I get home. But thanks to all of the team who stepped up to help out, uh, make sure that our students and our families got to enjoy a little bit of tradition as they head into the Thanksgiving break.

I want to spend a little bit of time, uh, talking to you about our course selection and academic advising changes for the 26-27 school year. Um, there's a major change coming for families with middle and high school students for the 26-27 year, and it has to do with how, and more importantly, when they select their courses for next year. We are moving the course selection window earlier in the spring semester. Doing so gives students more voice in shaping the course offerings and helps our campuses plan more effectively for staffing. Our counseling teams already do an excellent job guiding families through this process. This year, as we move the timeline forward, families will also see a stronger district presence and more accessible resources to help them navigate these really important decisions for their futures.

One example is the webinar we held on Monday night, led by Dr. Bker and his advanced academics and pathways team, in partnership with the school and community relations team. Turnout was significant. We had more than 500 families join in the webinar, which tells us that there's strong demand for clear and timely information. And so, this next slide shows a quote from one of our webinar guests. "I appreciate the information, resources, and genuine care shared tonight. Your professionalism and warmth reflect the school district truly dedicated to student success and strong family partnerships. I'll dig around the LISD links, connect with our school counselor, and share with others. Thank you so much for sharing this information." The recording and the slides from Monday's webinar have been added to the course selection hub for families to reference throughout this process.

And we would like to give a huge shout out to our empowered staff, assistant principals, district administrators, directors, and deans of instruction, as we appreciate them in this week as we head into Thanksgiving. We wish you all very safe and special holiday with your families. Thank you, Madam President.

>> Board members, do you have any questions for Dr. Garing?

>> No. Thank you, Dr. Garing. Board members, since we have a guest presenter with us this evening, we're going to change the order and start with 8A2. Consider approval of the 2024-2025 annual comprehensive financial report. Whenever y'all are ready, take it away.

Good evening, Madam President. Uh, members of the board of trustees, Dr. Garing. Uh, tonight we are here to re for our our annual financial report. Are we with us? With us tonight, we have Addison Ebarb with Whitley Penn, who's our our auditor, who will go through a presentation, walk you through the highlights of the of the audit, and then Miss Dana Pollson, our and myself will be here to answer, uh, any questions in case Addison has any problem. No, I'm just kidding. Addison will all there's any questions or specifics to to our data, we'll be more than happy to answer any questions. But I will let, uh, turn the time over to, uh, to Mr. Ibar to begin his presentation.

Good evening, board superintendent. Can you hear me? Can you hear me? Okay. Like Pete said, I'm Addison Earb. I was, uh, the senior manager on the engagement. So, worked closely with Pete and Dana, um, and their team to complete the audit this year. And, uh, first off, want to give a shout out to them for, uh, the hard work and collaboration that, um, goes into the audit and, um, helping it run as smoothly as an audit can. Right.

So tonight, uh, we'll go over, uh, the results of the FY2025 audit. Um, we'll start with a few slides, uh, about the audit process, the results of the audit, and then, uh, take a dive into the numbers and then end with, uh, some required communications. So, just to take you kind of through the audit process and and the pieces that go into that, we start off with the planning phase, which is, uh, biggest part is our risk assessment. And this involves lots of emails, looking at preliminary numbers, budgets, um, and we'll look at another slide, excuse me, uh, of some other ratio analysis and those types of things that we look at, um, but but really just helping us plan our audit procedures for the current year, especially based on, uh, any changes that we're seeing within the district.

Then next, we take a look at internal controls. Uh, we determine if we can rely on, uh, those internal controls and if we can reduce risks of material misstatements related to various financial statement areas. Then, uh, we move into substantive testing. Uh, this is where we obtain sufficient audit evidence to support, uh, the numbers that ultimately would go into the financial statements. And, uh, this is what people traditionally think of with an audit. Um, you know, tying down to bank statements, invoices, um, really kind of the the nitty-gritty of the audit. And then lastly, that moves us to the opinion. Um, and and we'll go over the three options that you can receive, um, in your auditor opinion.

So, the purpose of the financial statement audit and the single audit both, um, is to receive that auditor opinion. There's three options that you can receive, uh, for an auditor opinion. First is the unmodified or what's typically referred to as the clean opinion that everybody wants on their financial statements. Next, uh, would be a modified opinion. This is, uh, typically due to a departure from GAAP, um, or some type of scope limitation. And then lastly is the disclaimer opinion, which is really your most adverse opinion, um, and and really, uh, saying that we, uh, disclaim our opinion from the financial statements.

So, our areas of focus, um, and especially in a lot of our control testing and and looking at the district's controls, policies, procedures, um, start with information technology, so it then really look at a lot of the PE's reporting and and all the processes and controls related to that. Uh, we do quite extensive control testing and actually test the effectiveness of operating for non-payroll and payroll controls. We'll also do some, uh, control testing over other revenues, uh, as well as procurement, um, and how those controls, uh, ensure compliance related to procurement, and then, uh, also any federal specific tests related to our major programs that we've selected for the current year, which we'll go over in a couple of slides, uh, on on how those are selected.

The substantive procedures, as I mentioned, are are really the, um, tying down to the tying down to support and, um, you know, substantiating the numbers that will go on the financial statements. So, start out with, um, analytical procedures and and looking at flux and ratio analysis, how it compares to prior years and looking for any outliers and making sure that we can kind of explain those with either what's going on within the district or or possibly just the market in general. And then we will perform some predictive tests, um, you know, especially in in your revenue and expenses to, um, you know, based on your enrollment or other factors, we can, uh, predict what revenue might be and, uh, or what it could be, and then compare that to actual, and then vouching, uh, like I said, really looking at bank statements, invoices, um, any any kind of paper, nowadays a lot's electronic, right, but, um, really what you think of of of supporting those numbers. And then we also confirm with third parties, um, and so send out confirmations to banks, uh, and financial institutions and and bondholders to both confirm cash side as well as the debt, um, and then also, uh, use third-party reports from the TEA comptroller's payment report and other TEA payment ledgers.

I'm happy to say that Leander ISD did, uh, receive an unmodified opinion over the financial statements for this year. Um, and the audit was, uh, in accordance with both generally accepted auditing standards and generally accepted government auditing standards, um, which includes those additional yellow book, um, or government, uh, requirements. Also, there were no internal control findings related to financial reporting and no findings related to compliance within the financial reporting.

Now, I'll go over the preliminary single audit results. And the single audit is the audit, uh, that we perform over the, uh, federal dollars that are expended. And we are guided by, uh, the OMB's compliance supplement that's that's, uh, released each year. And unfortunately, the, uh, compliance supplement for 2025 has not officially been released. And obviously, the government closure, uh, did not help with that timeline. So, everything we'll be talking about here is technically in draft form, um, until that compliance supplement is actually released, at which point we'll be able to put our opinion on it. Our major programs for this year, um, were Title 2 Part A and Child Nutrition Cluster. Uh, we did have an unmodified opinion over each of those major federal programs. Unfortunately, within the Child Nutrition Cluster, we did note a material weakness over procurement. Um, and this was just, uh, related to procuring services with a vendor over that, uh, simplified acquisition threshold. Um, and we did meet with management, and they have, excuse me, developed a corrective action plan, and beefed up controls related to the guidance over procurement.

Now, to look at the financial statement numbers. Um, so for the government-wide financial statements, this really includes both your long-term, uh, and your short-term assets and liabilities. Um, so, really kind of the overall health of the district when you bring in those, uh, long-term assets and liabilities. So, the total assets and deferred outflows ended at 2.4, 4 billion, uh, for the year ended 6/30/25. And cash investments are main component, or the main components of that are cash and investments, 729 million; capital assets, net, uh, of accumulated depreciation and amortization, 1.5 billion; and then receivables of 21 million. The total liabilities and deferred inflows, uh, ended the year at 2.6 billion. Uh, the largest components of that are going to be 2.1 billion, uh, for bonds payable, net pension liability of 134 million, and then, uh, net other post-employment benefits, um, of 89 million, or OPEB liability. Ending net position, uh, was negative 172 million, but I will point out, um, that, uh, the net effect with the net pension and OPEB liabilities, which are calculated by the TRS and, uh, really are a non-cash liability. Um, so when those are added back, um, it adds back 217 million to that to that negative ending net position. So, um, just, just to take that into account.

>> Yeah. And just to add one thing, when you look at, if you think about school first, when they do their calculation, they subtract out the 217 when you look at your net pension piece. So, it's like, like Addison has said, it's strictly a paper entry. It's just required by, by GASB, or the Government Accounting Standards Board, sorry.

All right. Now, to go over, uh, the general fund and the budget to actual comparison for the fiscal year. Actual revenues of 442 million were less than final budgeted revenues, um, by just about six million, and actual expenditures of 470 million, um, were less than final budget by 12 million. So, so positive, kind of overall effect there. Net other financing sources were a million for the year, um, for an overall decrease to fund balance of 27 million. The total ending fund balance for, uh, the general fund for fiscal year 2025 was 158 million.

Just, uh, we'll go over a few graphs here, um, to compare general fund revenues, expenses, and then, um, the fund balance, um, on on the back side. It. Um, you can see here, uh, is a general fund revenue analysis comparison with the final budget, the actual, uh, current year, and the actual prior year there. Um, and then it goes, uh, from left to right, a breakdown, uh, of your overall totals, and then into your local revenue. So, um, mostly your property taxes, and some other small pieces of local revenue, and then state revenue, next largest portion, and then lastly, the federal revenue there.

Now, to look at it, uh, as percentages of, of, uh, the total general fund revenue. You can see property taxes, as I mentioned, kind of that local revenue, 74%, uh, 328 million; state aid, that next largest portion, 70%, or 16%, excuse me, 70 million, um, and then moving down to TRS on behalf, which is 6%, and then interest income and other for a total of 442 million, as we saw on the previous slide.

Now, to look at the general fund expenditures, and again, kind of how those compare to the final budget and, uh, the the current year actual and the prior year actual. Um, and again, moving from left to right, starting with the overall total, and then, uh, moving into, uh, the the different functions of the district and and how those expenses are under each, uh, function. The next slide, um, has similar, uh, to the revenues, shows that, uh, kind of a little better pie chart there of how you can see the percentage, 63%, uh, greatest piece there going towards instruction and related services, um, 7% instructional and school leadership, and then 12% student support services, um, which I'll point out, you know, is is an overall total of 80, 82% um, of monies expended that are going back to the students and and not just under, uh, going under general administration or or towards maintenance and operations.

Now, to look at the general fund balance over the last few years, um, you can see how, uh, it compares to the prior years. We did have, uh, that decrease in the current year. Um, and then to, uh, break it down into, uh, the colors there and and the different, uh, pieces of what make up the general fund balance. Uh, obviously, the largest portion there in red, unassigned, uh, fund balance, which ended the year at 99 million, and then, uh, the next portion there is going to be assigned, um, and which is 58 million, um, and then, uh, committed, ended the year at zero after, uh, moving out from assigned from the prior year. And then, uh, about a half a million, almost a million in non-spendable.

And, uh, here's a chart showing the general fund, uh, assigned and unassigned fund balance as a percent of expenditures, which is always something that TEA is looking at. As you can see, pretty comparative to, uh, the prior year. Um, but you can see the, the overall swing, um, over the five years, um, ending there with the 158 million, which is 34% of, of expenditures.

Now, I'll go over those additional required communications. Um, so, we did issue our engagement letter, uh, December 13, 2024, which, which was signed. And do want to communicate audit risks, uh, that were identified, but, but I do want to say they're applied to all of our audited entities, and so they're, they're not specific to, uh, Leander ISD or anything that we noted. Um, these are standard, uh, risks across all of our engagements. And these just include management override, or management override of internal controls. And that, that is why we perform tests over various areas, uh, over the internal controls, looking for any chance that management could override those. Um, and then also revenue recognition. So, just ensuring that, uh, any monies received are, are, uh, recorded properly in the proper period and and classified properly.

We also had no disagreements or difficulties, uh, with with dealing with management, and we are independent of the district. The district's accounting policies and methods are appropriate and in accordance with industry standards. As part of our audit, we do, uh, review the policies and and make sure they're within industry standards, um, and compare those against any TEA, uh, guidelines. We did have an implementation of a Governmental Accounting Standards Board, uh, or GASB, accounting standard this year, and that was GASB number 101 related to compensated absences. Um, and it really changed the way, uh, that compensated absence accruals are calculated, estimated, um, and then ultimately recorded. But, um, I, I, based on the, the district's policies and everything, this did not have a material effect on the financial statements.

So, uh, regarding consultations with other accountants, we're not aware of any situations in which management consulted with other accountants on accounting or financial reporting matters. Really, just, just meaning a second opinion on, on these audited financial statements here.

>> And with that, I'll take any questions.

Board members, do you have any questions? We are speechless. This never happens. Um, but thanks. I We have no other questions, but thanks for the presentation. I mean, it was pretty thorough. I mean, thank you. Thanks Pete's team for working to getting this audit together. We appreciate it. We know y'all are doing some great stuff.

>> Great. Thank you. So, we'll be, um, submitting all this information, of course, to TEA within the, um, time frame that they've allotted. Normally, it is the end of November, but because of the government closure, um, and the delay in the OM, they are giving us until January, which, um, to be able to submit the data. And they are also implementing a new audit module. So, once that's open, we'll be submitting the information so that it all complies with deadlines and so it doesn't impact our first ratings.

Well, >> thank you so much for that update. All right, board members, this is up for a vote, so I will need a motion.

I move that the board of trustees approve the 24, 2024-2025 annual comprehensive financial report as presented.

>> I second it.

A motion from Nikosi, a second from Trish. Any discussion, board members? All in favor? Seven, I. Motion passes. Thank you, y'all so much for all your work on this. We appreciate it.

All right, board members. We have a heavy agenda item. So, we are going to take a 13-minute break. And it is 7:36. So, I'll see you back in 13 minutes. I did 13 cuz Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat

A single FTE. Um, just again, so many different dynamics on on each campus. But okay, so now I put a pin in all the bar charts for all the campuses. Now, what we've done is embedded the staffing guidelines phase one and phase two. So now you can see between that 50-400 number, between the green line and the red line, you see where some of our campuses lie. And you can see some of them lie, say, Baghdad in the middle with who zoned is right in between. But with the transfers in the PreK, they're well above that staffing guideline. And so this is that visual understanding if we, if we moved programs, if we, then that what kind of implications may that have on a certain campus, um, given where they sit with with enrollment. And so we have all the campuses, uh, that we went through. Again, um, you can kind of see where everyone is is kind of sitting within those those guidelines. Um, and and those that are below that guideline, given their their transfers and, uh, and program needs. So this is the visual that we were hoping that would help create context for some of the discussions and, and possibly, uh, future decisions.

So, what, what are the next steps now that we've presented all this information, um, to you? We don't just leave this information and not have it lead into different, um, future conversations. So, staffing guidelines need to be finalized, and staffing guidelines lead to a lot of different things. Um, as we get our grade level projection enrollment, um, and then that leads into staffing for campuses. These are incredibly important in order for us to do just that, which goes into and ties into budget as well.

But then you saw on that timeline that there's still the establish thresholds. Thresholds still need to be established. Again, threshold one triggers low enrollment staffing model adjustments, and then threshold two would trigger review for potential consolidation. And so what we've presented to you are staffing guidelines phase one and two, not necessarily thresholds, um, that will, uh, be needed to discuss at the next meeting.

And then, uh, lastly, explore mitigation strategies. And so once a campus drops below that first threshold, what mitigation strategies may be possible? What strategies may we identify and, um, discuss in order to mitigate that campus, um, from moving toward that second threshold and dropping below there. That's what the mitigation strategies are for. And, um, and that could match the staffing guidelines. It may not, but it allows a little bit of time in order to to try to mitigate that, uh, declining enrollment. And there it is in the timeline. Those are the two subjects that are kind of next up on our, um, progress timeline right here. Reminder, no decisions have been made at this time. We're here at a discussion to talk about three different, um, subjects, um, tonight. And so we welcome any questions. Um, we'll answer them the best we can. Thank you for your patience.

All right, board members. I know we've got lots of questions, so we're going to share the mic. So Laura, since you are our very first board member, you get to kick us off.

All right, thank you. Um, I do like that we're moving in the direction of transparency, some objectivity, and, and I think that that's really helpful. Um, this is a little bit, uh, specific, but something that I think would be helpful on slide for me at least on slide, um, where is it? 23. Um, I would find it very helpful to have this slide, but only for PreK. So knowing the reason for transfer within PreK, um, is it parent choice? Is it staff, um, is it sped? There's a lot of transfers within our PreK population, and so I think for me, it would be helpful to know, um, why, um, as we're thinking about PreK and, um, how we serve PreK students in the district, what that looks like for enrollment, that kind of thing. So that's not really a question, but just a.

Yeah, I think it, it, it's kind of a hybrid between this matrix and in that chart, right? Because, you know, some are just transferring because the campus that community doesn't have PreK3, right? And so then they have to go to this other community that has PreK3. So there is quite a bit of mobility, you'll see there. And so we can work on trying to to identify some of that additional information that may help inform you.

Yes, that would be helpful. Thank you. As we're looking at these, um, staffing guidelines and the different phases, you, you mentioned Jeremy, that broadly, if we're saying there's 450 students, right? We're saying between K through five, we're looking at maybe, you know, two to three classes in eighth grade, but we know the distribution varies, right? When I look at the POSA report, when I look at our numbers that you sent, we see very clearly at some of our schools that kindergarten, we see the size of the classes, right? Our largest class is fifth grade, gets a little smaller in fourth grade, gets a little smaller in third, gets way smaller in kindergarten and first grade. Um, and we know that those are just going to move through the system just like, just like we saw in the POSA report. Do we have in these staffing guidelines? What are we thinking about when, like, kindergarten is one class? Um, you know, have we, how does that impact, like, the PLC and all of those pieces, but maybe it's still falling within our staffing guideline of phase one because they're over in fourth and fifth grade, right? Um, how does that impact, and I don't know if that's maybe a Chris Clark question about, like, I'm thinking about PLCs and that distribution of responsibilities, if we have one kindergarten teacher or two kindergarten teachers, what are the, uh, impacts for the staff, what are also the impacts for our PLC and the educational opportunities for those students?

Yeah, I, in general, the, the a team of one is not a team, right? It's a, that's like tennis, um, so what principles will tell you is it is more challenging. Our teachers are working really hard to overcome small numbers and collaborate, and I think our principles are getting really creative at pairing across campuses, pairing K and one teachers together. So there's some creativity to overcome that, but it does create more challenge, I guess, in terms of the small number of teachers. Yeah.

Uh, slide 26. I just need some clarification because it sounds like when y'all were presenting to us that you're looking for direction from the board as far as a threshold. Like, I'm trying to figure out where you're wanting direction. Like, are you wanting the board to ask to say, hey, we want you to look at a certain number? Like, I'm trying to understand what y'all are wanting from us. Like, is this a final guideline? Yeah. Like, that's what I'm trying to understand because the reason why I'm going there with that, the way I perceived y'all's presentation was that this could change, and I want to just get clarify of that because I know our principles have been giving feedback on this a lot, and I would hate for the board to go and unwind that feedback. So can you give me some better clarification what you're looking for from the board in regards to this, um, chart?

I will say that staffing guidelines are important because it begin, it begins to frame possible thresholds because one thing with with staffing guidelines is that after all the work, we have these, but also in establishing thresholds, this may lead to thresholds, but, um, we want to be able to have that conversation next time, and thresholds may vary from this, especially that that second threshold. But we still have this that we have to go by, just from a staffing standpoint, right? But from a threshold conversation, um, it may vary. It may align perfectly, but we need to have that conversation next time. Um, and just understand that there needs to be a delta typically between thresholds to allow mitigation strategies. Um, and I couldn't tell you exactly what that delta needs to be, but traditionally a gap helps, um, in in those efforts. Um, and so this is kind of a start. It may lead directly into thresholds, but right now it's, uh, from a staffing guideline, this is what we need to to lean in on.

No, I appreciate that. I just, the, what I was trying to avoid is having the board go in and start making our own staffing guidelines because that is not our lane. And so I just wanted to get that out of the way and make sure because I was going to stop it right there.

No, that's what I was going to say is this will be an administrative decision, but we want this to help inform y'all's decisions.

Thank you all so much. I appreciate that.

Um, my question is on this slide. So, when it comes to the, the two, uh, PE teacher, fine arts teacher in yellow, where you have the number two, like two teachers. So, right now in elementary for fine arts, they have art and performing arts. So, you're saying that between PE, performing arts, and art, that they'll figure out how to have two teachers do that and still cover the TEKS?

Yes.

Okay. And, um, quick one. My other question is very similar to Gloria's, but with respect to early childhood, um, which is we have a lot of campuses. So when we look at what is it, slide seven and eight or six and seven, where we have, um, early childhood, oh my gosh, you guys, oh, yeah, that one. Well, yeah, that, sorry, keep going. It's, it's the next one. Keep go, I think it's 12, 13, then.

Yeah, this one. Yeah, 12, 13. So, um, it's, we have it spread out across several campuses. So, as a result, you have PreK, um, collaborations or PreK teams that are small, or class sizes that are small. And so I was just wondering, not necessarily identifying schools, but looking at whether it's the similar, um, discussion that we're having with elementary, where you have smaller collaboration teams, whether we should be looking at some point, um, further consolidating these into, say, I'm just going to throw out a wild number, six or seven campuses, and, um, Yeah. And then, and then let us know if that's more effective for student learning, for teacher collaboration, and also for cost efficiency.

I like, I like that. Shade Nosy, you're up.

Uh, let's see. Uh, slide 20. Um, slide 22, I believe. Is it 22? Just had a question here. Um, this includes, well, I think I think I know the answer, and so I have a request, but this includes transfers. This includes PreK as well on this slide. I'd love to see the transfers without PreK. And so really, just disagregate this slide for all the parent choice, um, like all the, the different, uh, I think in the next chart you have, um, the color-coded bar graph, maybe just a separate matrix for each one of these categories. And then obviously, the next step is, I'd love to understand that parent choice and disagregate that and really understand what, why parents are choosing to to move different schools. So that's just one, one piece. And then the last piece, just to piggyback on on Shade, I had a question, the 12 and 13, just and just the PreK, like understanding the, like the programmatic intentionality around that and, and understand, like, what's our goal? And very similar to, like, is it to consolidate? Like, what is our vision around PreK and, and potential consolidation and creating the hubs?

Can I add to your thing, Nosy? I like where he's going with this. Um, but, you know, in regards to parent choice, I would, I'd be curious to see, we know some of these campuses have like the leader and me program. I'd be curious to see if some of these campuses, what special, um, programs they have like that, and if that is driving their transfer rate to go up because of the special program that they have. I'm just wondering because I know there's quite a few.

Yes, some of what we've heard is that they actually apply to transfer. If the students have had their early childhood at that campus, then they just want to stay. Sometimes that's what the transfer is.

Oh, sorry. Go ahead, Chris.

I, there's like four different questions I was trying to respond to. I, I don't want to speak out of turn. The vast majority of these transfers though, like when you look at Baghdad where that large, it's dual language. That's what most of our elementary transfers are about. It's now there are one-off, more than one-off, but smaller numbers of transfers where it's just parent choice. There is a phenomenon that has played out at a few of our schools where they go to a school for, um, early childhood, and then choose to stay there K through five. Deer Creek is one that comes to mind. There might be a couple other ones. That one is one that is a little more significant, but the vast majority of these are dual language. PreK transfers in general are mostly because their campus is not a community. The whole purpose of the community to answer your question and Aaron Garner is here, but the whole purpose of the community is to allow that because when you look at this data broken out by zones, you you end up with a lot of schools with one PreK teacher, and that that ends up being what you were just talking about, Gloria. So maybe as the hubs get smaller, it is better to consolidate. I'm really interested to see how the ECC plays out and having a campus full of early childhood and what that looks like, and is that something worth exploring further, or is it just larger hubs? Space is always an issue, like Jeremy said at the beginning, when you can't just open up a PreK, you can, but in theory, then if you have a student in PreK4, you have one class, and then the student qualifies for, uh, uh, special services, and we don't have an early childhood special ed teacher. You know, we have to then move the kid, and that's hard on a four-year-old. So, there are some core programs that all go together and to make sure we can serve students properly, which goes back to our philosophy and the whole reason for the communities to begin with. If I think that answers your question, there might have been another question in there. I can't remember if I answered. Just an observation too, is that because essentially it's a closed system, when you move students from one campus to another, you you do something to this receiving campus, but you also do something to this, uh, existing campus. And so in that closed system, you have to be very thoughtful about what are the impact of moving students campus to campus.

I, I want to just, I need to piggyback off that because, okay, I need to let me address what you just said, Dr. Garing, because I think some of the issues I've had in this process is that we know PreK enrollment varies year to year, and we've seen campuses where we have low enrolled PreK for that year, and we're having to move a teacher or a class off. And so this family or this teacher now is in the beginning of the year having to move. And so with us knowing on slide 18 that 61% of PreK kids remain in LISD, I'm trying to understand why we're so against at making an ECC hub model in the central and south central side because we know if we can get these students in, they're going to come. And this board's been asking for us to be innovative and to try different things. This ECC hub that we're doing in the north is something we've never done. It's innovative. It's giving parents that full-on, you know, special, not special, uh, early childhood education. We have parents as teachers there. I mean, it is going to be something we've never done before. And so I'm trying to understand the resistance at having these like hubs per se so we can try to one, bring some stability to the system, so we won't have these campuses where it's like, this year you have 72 PreK kids, next year is 52, now you're in this phase two model. Like, I'm trying to understand, like, are we going to try to get to the same model we're doing in the north so we can see some of this innovative program we're asking for, but also, I mean, it says 61% of our PreK students remain in LISD, we should really be focusing on this. So can you help me understand, is this the direction we see our district going, or did the board need to give you direction to say, hey, we want to see some hubs, like actual ECC models?

Well, I, I was just going to say that I think it's, it's a, it's a reasonable ask, right, to understand, you know, we've had this model for quite a while, and so understanding what are the implications of doing that, right? We can see in the north, right, we, we have a lot of campuses that are going to need some relief, and so this ECC is going to provide that. That's one purpose that the ECC can provide, and then there's other things like you mentioned, if you brought that to the central and in the south, but we always want to identify what are those downrange impacts. And so when you do that, we need to understand that what h, what's that going to look like on all the existing communities as we're seeing stabilized and declining enrollment. And so it's, it's, it's not a, a bad exploration, but we do know that there probably be some downrange, uh, implications. We just need to know those.

Along and along those lines, that's why I, I don't know that there's resistance. I think I'm curious to see how it plays out in the north because what I just described happens at Deer Creek, happens at Deer Creek because they get dialed into that school and they're connected. So, when we pull it at a separate place and then they have to make a transition, you know, let's see how that impacts overall enrollment. You know, it's just, I'm not saying that will or won't happen. I think it's as we open the early childhood center, um, look at all the deltas and the pluses that go along with it.

I agree. I mean, as a parent, you know, whose child did dual language, we did not go to our home campus, so I came back. But we do have kids, students in the north who are not, we're Parkside goes to Giddens. That is a complete different feeder pattern. So, I mean, we have parents already in our district, a lot of them who are not in that same feeder pattern who are going back to their home campus. I just, I, I would like to explore it just because I think it's a great thing, and I think early education is one of my things, y'all know, but if the data supports that these students are going to stay in our system, and this board's looking for innovative ideas, I, I would really like to see, I'm not saying we need to go for it, but I really would like to explore that option. I, I honestly, I'm very interested in it because I gave you some reasons that could be a challenge. But on the flip side, you know, it's almost like when I sent my, my daughter to sixth grade, I was really nervous about her being around eighth grade boys. So if you have a three and four-year-old, are you nervous about them being in a school with fifth graders? I think parents do have that perspective. So there is something magical about a school full of three and four-year-olds, and then you add parents as teachers into the mix. You can specialize. It's a real different feel, and the way we're staffing the ECC is going to, I think, make a difference. So, I'm not saying good, bad, one way. I think it's worth exploring and learning as we open up the ECC.

I, I, I will weigh in a little bit though, because yes, the learning model, we're very excited about. Um, but a big reason that we decided on the early childhood center in the north was to provide relief for our over-enrolled northern campuses, um, which it's, it's clearly going to do. Um, so if you were to go to slide 27, if you could, um, and, and just pick, say, Cox Elementary or Giddens Elementary, and, and if you were to open an ECC that would take those PreK students off of Cox Elementary and Giddens Elementary, and now suddenly you have a different enrollment problem at that elementary school. And that's what I'm talking about in a closed system. When you create enrollment here, you also lose enrollment somewhere else. And so you have to be very thoughtful, is all I'm saying. I really, I'm a huge proponent of early childhood and putting them in one place together because of the collaboration that can happen there and the learning that can happen there. I just want us to be very thoughtful about where and how we do that.

Yeah, but we also have to consider the impact of small sizes. Um, and also just, when I say small sizes, small sizes, uh, that are happening right now in PreK environments, um, and how that is impacting student learning and the teacher efficiency and the cost as well. So, yeah, it's, it might not be an entire center, but I, I think we still need to look at the hubs with those, at least three metrics, like student learning, teacher, um, collaboration, and then the cost efficiency, because that's also very important.

Yeah, that makes sense to me.

I agree.

Okay, share the mic. It's, it's Trish's turn.

I don't know, Trish. Anyone else have questions? I'm just kidding. Go, Trish. Tony Cassy, tell Anna to share the mic. No, those are all really good questions. I, I almost wonder if we need more PreK as a special item later to dig into it more. Um, slide 26. And I'm just going to use this as my illustration that prompted me. So, just, there's not a question here. It's my first intro, which is that when I look at this, and I look at phase two, um, you know, I know that some of our principles have have seen this, and I know there's some angst about how this impacts. And when I look at this, what, what this tells me is right now, what our district is doing is saying, assuming we're all going to do the same traditional model, we're all going to do the same type of educational system, all the districts, this is how we have to move forward based on what we've worked with right now. Now, I understand there could be tweaks, and there's no decisions made, but this is just a starting point in the conversation. What I'm wondering is though, when you get to that phase one, and we're talking about later for triggers or mitigation or phase two, do we then allow principles to have an opportunity to talk about what else they could do besides the traditional model? Do they get input into that? What if they stack classes? Like, um, when we went, when, when Anna and, and I and Bruce went up to.

Kapal?

Kapal.

Right.

Oh, yes. And, and, uh, they, I don't know, I'm mispronouncing it. U, but, you know, we kind of saw kids based on skill level, and there was really some powerful learning that was happening in that environment. Looks a little different though, right? Because maybe your first grader and a second grader might be paired together. But that would also be a way where you could still keep your PAC PLCs, but think outside the box. What about if you know, you look at a magnet program, you pull out something, then maybe you don't need the certain specials because this is one school that you're really focusing on the magnet. I'm just curious about that. And so then that's just my thought. I got to thinking, okay, so what is really happening then? Like, when I look at this, I'm like, okay, our numbers are this. So, let me see what's happening with our phase phase one and phase two campuses, right? And so, I'm getting my paperwork out. And so, I can't ask a whole lot more questions unless I figure something out. So, I hope you can help me. And I, I didn't even notice this issue until I was just sitting here and you were talking about it. When I look at, um, the, the numbers we have here for current, they are going to be different from the current numbers in PASA. So when you show me, and we see like the map of like, what ECC does to the trajectory of the campus, well, the numbers are different when you look at current. I would like to know, is there a way where we could really see based on the current trends or the current things, what happens with an ECC? Um, because I'll give you, I'll give you two examples. Um, Akin's a good one. Akin right now shows a capacity at, um, 884 is the current capacity, but it's not at 884. It's 88, what is it? 8, I'm sorry, the lines right there. Is it 812? So it's there's like a whole classroom difference on Aken from from what this graph says is currently in there versus what we're saying. But then when I look at, like, Block House Creek, Block House Creek is sitting there at, well, it's at 412 in a tens, but the model says it's at 496. 496 and 2526, right? No. Yeah. 2526. So you see what I'm saying is the numbers that we have that's current are not matching like when we start seeing these campuses come into place, what really our projections are going to be. And I'm just saying, I'm trying to figure out what, why this important to me is because I'm curious about enrollment balancing, which is, you know, when we have these districts that are projected to go really high, is it possible, and I know consolidation, we're talking about families and students, and that is, we, we love our neighborhood schools, but we also have to figure out how to make good use of our resources. I know when we talk about zoning, people don't want to move either. We love our neighborhood schools, but we still have to use our resources. And so, I'm still figuring this out. If I look at, you know, Aken, that was going to be projected high. And assuming those numbers are somewhat accurate, we can get through there later. Could they go to Blackhouse Creek, which when I look at Blackhouse Creek is like only 13 below being phase two. But again, when I look at our PASA numbers, I have a challenge because Blackhouse Creek actually shows me, you know, at over, you know, 58 and 59% of the capacity. So, I'm just, you know, what I'm saying? I'm trying to put these together, and I'd like to figure out how we, how we're able to really have a number that we all agree on of what's really happening, um, so we can be consistent with the projections. Um, and really kind of weigh into if in case, because that might be a question that is going to be a question I'm gonna ask is, can we strategically rezone some of these really large campuses? Is there a way to help give relief and actually help our schools that are right there on a line that may be in a phase two category, and it could move them right up to a phase one?

Can I get clarification? Trish, are you looking at this one? We got, is this K through five only?

PreK as well. PreK is on here because it does say on here K through five up at the top. That's why I'm curious.

So, um, so, okay. So, your numbers include PreK. It's K through five, PreK, and then you have your net transfers.

Okay.

Just remember, it's, it's a great observation because this is why demographics are difficult.

And what we tried to set up, um, and I'll take us back to May 29th real quick. As we looked at those charts, we had three different categories of data. We had our current enrolled, and then we had, and we will have soon from PASA. Then we have our grade level projections, which go, I mean, that gets very granular, but beyond next year, it's only resident students. Why? Because you have, um, 132 PreKers at Baghdad this year. Well, you may not have that in two years, three years. And so beyond next year into 27, we have to utilize the resident projections that PASA, um, provides. And that's where it becomes difficult because it's the only way to do long-range planning is to utilize projections based on the geocoded students because this scenario you're seeing right here will not be the same next year because we just don't know what parents are going to choose, um, because you see there's a, a lot of transfers. Um, we don't know that 170 will be in dual language at at Baghdad. You know, it may be 120 next year depending on how many fifth graders roll up. And so that's the challenge that we have, and that's kind of how we've been trying to set up data is once we get out past one year, we need to utilize PASA's, um, projections. And it's not to the, I wish we could do this for every year for the next 10 years. It would just, it would, it would just not be reliable enough.

I guess.

I have a question like, just based on what you just said, I just want to clarify what you just asked.

So using this slide where it says, um, Block House Creek, so 462 and 39. So, does that mean that those kids are the zoned kids that you first of all apply, or you first of all, yes, apply in your currently zoned school, and then you transfer?

Yes.

And so it's a 501 when you add those to early childhood?

And K through five. So they're 501.

Block House Creek, creek zoned students that have registered at their current campus. And then, um, all because they don't have PreK on campus, all those 39 are somewhere else. And then some of the zoned students have also transferred out. And so finally, what who's attending is 437. So even though PASA said 496, it's 501.

It would be if there was no transfers, there's nothing. Everyone just went kids is 501. That's 462 plus 39. That's who registered, the zoned students that registered at Block House. And then early childhood is out because it's not on campus. And then the other, some of the K through five students, 20some of them transferred out.

Sure. No, I'm, yeah. And I'm not saying, not saying either number is like wrong. I'm saying when we're going like, at some point I could project that when we're talking about an elementary school maybe 31 or 32.

Yeah.

We're going to want to know how does that impact these numbers and when we're looking at such a, a variation.

Where we're going to have schools that could go down below that phase two by moving in an ECC or by moving in, uh, a 31 or by moving in a 32. If we're going to start pulling schools way down, how do we balance on these projections? Right? Because we're also trying to address some of the students who are in, we talked about that we were going to look at students in open enrollment campuses, and I don't, I don't, I would like to see, you know, does the board even, and we'll continue on the conversations, think that at some point though, looking at zoning to help give some of our campuses relief, especially when they're by these campuses that are underenrolled, right?

I, I get there's no good answer. I'm just, I'm just want to know how do we look at these numbers, um, and, and, and balance them carefully as we're, we're moving forward, and maybe, maybe we'll just say, well, this is the PASA projection, remember, it's not the current enroll. Maybe that's just the best way to make sure we know the assumptions when we're talking because I get it, you are, you are balancing a whole lot of different things in there, but, um, it would just help to make sure we're all on the same page.

Yeah, I think, I think this breakdown is triggering the conversation that you're bringing up, right? It's a good conversation, good questions as we move forward and how we'd want to continue to communicate this information.

Yeah, I think for me, very aligned to what Trish was mentioning, um, thinking about what this looks like with 31 and 32, and then as we think about what, um, those school, those campus consolidations look like. I think if we strategically look at some of these low-enrolled campuses and what being able to consolidate, I think, um, you can take three campuses that are in the low-enrolled matrix and move them up, and, and then they would no longer be in phase one or phase two, you know. So, I think in some areas, I think it's that, and then I think in some areas, maybe it is a strategic reason, and some of the, I think it's, it's both of those things. But I, I also think we're looking at the current numbers, but I also think those K through two grades are very telling, right? We know that we see these grades, they're moving up every year, and they're smaller and smaller grades. So, in some of these areas where these numbers are low, we already know what's going to happen next year and the following year. Um, they're getting lower. And I know we've talked about open enrollment, and I have some questions in my next time about open enrollment. But I also know that you and I have talked a lot about open enrollment because I was very eager for open enrollment, and I still am. But now that, and you were right. You were right. Yes, you were. I kept wanting to push it, and I said it was going to be the, the silver bullet that was going to fix everything. And you said, "Gloria, let's see what's happening at some of these other campuses." And they're doing it, and every year they're they're getting a little bit, a little bit, and they're hoping that over a five to 10 year period, they'll get this much. But yes, each year it's not going to, I think I'm very hopeful that over time it can help in some of, um, the balancing, but I also think it's important that we're looking when we're looking at these numbers, these are current numbers, but those K through two campuses, I mean, the K through two grades, the numbers are the smallest. Um, when I look at these numbers, and we see a school that's at 437, half of those are not third, you know, half of those is, is not third through fifth grade. It's more like 70% is the third through fifth grade. Um, and so I think that's really important for us to look at because these numbers, I was like, almost thinking, I know we're asking for too many charts, but visually for me, when I look at the attend, um, being able to look at the attend in this column and see, okay, in this column of attends, how many is fifth grade? How many is fourth grade? How many is third grade? Because when I go and look at the other chart that you provided, I started doing some of that calculation, and we're looking at third through fifth grade being somewhere like 70% of the students that are enrolled of that class at that school. So in another year, in another two years, it's significantly less than where it is right now. So I do think it's a combination of strategic reason to help in some of these other campuses. I think it's looking at where 31 and 32, and then I also think it's looking at some of these campuses that are low enrolled, and that over time, we also see those K through two are really small, and what it looks like to consolidate those with other schools so close by schools so we can push them out of phase one, or hopefully even out of, you know, push them out of phase two for sure, but hopefully even out of phase one so they're, you know, sitting where, where we are providing the best educational opportunity for our students.

I do, and, and to piggyback on that, and I'll be brief because Paul needs his, and we'll have to share the mic. I do think there's some good questions that that raises for me. And it's like, it, it feels like when we're talking about enrolled campuses that are overenrolled right now, we're going to talk about the impacts of building a campus like a 31, 32, we're going to use. But if we're going to talk about consolidation, we're using the numbers right now. And so I want to be, um, thoughtful on, like, when we're looking at the current numbers, right? The current, current, current, current numbers here instead of the PASA for the under. I want to be thoughtful about two, how, how we, how we kind of balance. And, and yes, consolidation may be an answer like that, and, and I do, I have questions like, okay, so then when can we let the community know? How do they get to buy in on what their campus could be? Do they buy in? What do we do? What's that process look like? But also, I also want to have that conversation on what could we do to mitigate? What if the numbers are really close, and open enrollment helps push them over? Like, what are the, if we did a magnet program and we got just enough students to kind of do that and put that up? Does that help? And, and I still think even though it's not, um, the staffing model that we're choosing, right? Like, if you did a magnet, the staffing model kind of doesn't necessarily apply the same way if you don't have the specials. I still think these numbers give us a good idea of, of kind of where we're, we're wanting. It sounds like from the board, from administration, from the community. I mean, it looks like we have optimum when we're over that, what, 400 number. Um, but that's still another conversation. So, I just feel like there's, I feel like, I feel like Gloria is right. Yes, there needs to be a conversation there. I just don't want to stop there. I want to look at all the different pieces because I think there's several pieces to a puzzle to make a really good decision here.

I need some clarification. Trish mentioned y'all are using two different sets of numbers. Can you help me explain what, what two different numbers because I want to, I'm trying to understand what two numbers she's referring to because I know this is a snapshot. I have that in my phone. That's a snapshot that we sent. I know that's so current, but.

So, I, I think how I heard it was that if we, when we look at building new schools, we're looking years out. And so typically, when you look years out, we're utilizing PASA for years out. Right now, we're deep in conversations just about low enrolled schools. And so we're gravitating towards this data set. And so it's, we need to understand again, now you see why there's differences between those, and a lot of them are tied to programs, why they're different. And so we just need to understand what data set that we're going to use. This is helping inform why enrollment is the way in which it is. Um, but, uh, I don't necessarily think that we would negate the PASA projections in any type of future consolidation because we would need to look at that to make a decision based on now, not understanding what's going to happen in the future, that that that, um, wouldn't respect kind of the process that we need to to go through. But this is a snapshot to understand really how that enrollment is made up right now. In addition, I think it's important to remember when we're coming up with staffing guidelines. So, we're not looking at staffing guidelines of where can we place it where we can get the most bang for our buck or anything like that. We're looking at what, what are our staffing philosophies, and what do we feel is something that can be done regardless of the situation we're in, where it could apply to all campuses. And so when we're looking at these proposed, um, phase one and phase two, that would be regardless of whether we're all at 400 or all at 900, it's what our philosophy of staffing is.

And, and before we jump on to a new question, I, I just want to go back and ask a curiosity question about what you said about the small kindergarten and first and second grade classes. So you remind, help remind me, um, what PASA talked about, I think was that yes, this, we have much smaller kindergarten classrooms across, and then as they flow out through the district, though, there's some stabilization that happens in the middle grade levels. It doesn't, I don't want us to imagine that that small kindergarten class stays that size and continues all the way through the system because that would, that would really indicate a complete decline, and, and that's not, I think, what I heard necessarily PASA say when they were here, which is that we, we are, we have, we're not growing fast anymore, but at some point in time, we're also not going to decline fast. We're going to stabilize and kind of wobble along. Am I, am I characterizing that correctly?

Yeah. Because if you look globally, we always talk about you graduate large 12th grade classes, and you bring in smaller kindergarten classes, and that that knits negative students typ, you know, typically. So you can apply that to elementary too. You know, as we graduate larger and fifth grade classes, we, we do have that bubble that's working through our system. Right now, as our fourth, some of our fourth and fifth grade cohorts move out of these more central campuses, then it'll drop back, and it'll stay, it stabilizes. You'll see a lot of them do that. Um, and, but we do gain students with each, each cohort. We do gain students throughout the system. And again, that's part of open enrollment, right? You do some targeted kinder, first is a sweet spot for getting transfers in because then they go through your entire system and work all the all the way through. So there is traditional growth, but that is K through two will kind of stabilize, um, in future years for, um, our elementary campuses. So if you see small kindergarten, that doesn't mean that everything is continuing to decline. You're going to see stabilization over, over the next few years. So there is still some net in migration, right, that's happening. That's not related to open enrollment or anything like that. That, that's families moving into the district either into new housing or existing housing. Right.

No, that's okay. I was just going to say though, it was interesting that that pattern wasn't uniform across all of the schools. So in some schools, it was actually reversed. Like I looked, I'm not going to name, but there were some, uh, schools that fell under phase two that had opposite patterns. So some had the largest classes were the youngest grades, and then other schools where it was flipped. So just the nuances there.

Very good point. Yes. Yes.

Paul, go ahead and ask your question.

Um, yeah, I think you guys kind of already answered it, but I'll ask it anyway. So, who makes the enrollment estimate projections for next year? Uh, on the sheet you handed this, there's a bunch of projections you know going out. So who does that?

Yeah. So, um, what that is, is we utilize that for long-term planning. PASA's, uh, projections are tied in there. Um, and what we do is we make sure PreK is included, and we, and but we did on the far left column give you the net transfers just as an identifier to better understand. But those are dem, we use PASA's demographic projections, um, for long range planning.

So how well did they do this year?

For this year, we were under, uh, projection total across the entire, entire district, we were under.

Yeah. I was told we, we missed it by like 600.

Yeah. Approximately.

So how many teachers is that?

Well, it's hard to say because it's 600 spread across, um, you know, 49 campuses, right? And so, um, all our students don't come in packages of 22 at elementary school. And so, it's, it's hard to say. I don't know the exact number of staff members. Um, but, um, I couldn't tell you exactly who those 600 are, but there is an impact to staff, obviously.

Well, my point being that PASA is perfectly imperfect, and I would be very careful on trying to make too much of a projection, um, in these going forward and making fast decisions. I know there are some that want the early education for the, the kids, but, um, you and I get why they put it in the north to, to help, but for where we are, um, to Trish's point, I wouldn't rush to make decisions quickly since that's just getting started. We, when we went from horses to cars, people didn't adapt right away because of cost, convenience, and performance, and they knew what they knew.

for 10,000 years. You know, we're a little different. We knew a little bit what we're doing, but as a district, but uh I just be quick. I wouldn't be quick to make changes too fast.

And if I could piggyback, although I like it when Paul talks about my point, um, but but I also want to make sure I clarify that when I'm I'm looking at PASA, we when she told us what the projections were like 10 years ago, I'm like, "Oh, well, we're off." But we're off when we talked about it because of alternative education, alternative options and choices. Demographics can't predict that, right? I that's going to be a limit limitation.

Um, and I the reason I'm I'm asking us just to be aware as we're transitioning from one or the other is because um PASA can do what's in the residence but as we're talking about the buildings and consolidations. It's just important to to to know which data points we're looking at and how we're looking at it.

Um, I actually think that when you look at PASA, I'm seeing the numbers that they have in here for their current projection that 20 of our campuses are lower than here that's in the current projection. I think that that that talks about what we're all dealing with is that declining enrollment or stabilization enrollment. Something's going on. We're going to have to figure out like how do we manage this in this environment.

Um so I do I think there's a place for POSA. I think there's a place for the current and I'm not saying either one's right or wrong. I am saying that I just want to make sure when we're switching from either one um that we're we're clear and maybe Paul you knew that's what I was saying. I just wanted to make sure that I was I clarified that.

>> So I have some question really quick Trish. Um, so are you are you I I get the sense that you're putting some doubt into PASA and their projections and so I'm wondering are you wanting perhaps admin to look at another organization because I I that's I'm just I tell me I'm trying to understand because I feel like a lot of what you're saying right now is we can't and what Paul has said as well is that PASA's projections aren't reliable and that we need to be careful on how we're deciding and so I'm just I'm just trying to understand like if we're going to concentrate on PASA's um expertise. Do we as a board want to go through another I'm just trying to understand the what y'all are asking for? That's all.

>> I'm not saying they're not reliable. I'm just saying that let's not just >> rush to decisions.

>> But don't we have to apply the net transfers to the PASA numbers? Because PASA doesn't know what the transfer would be. So they give us a number and then that's what's in that table and then we look at the net transfers and then apply that and is it still lower by the for 20 schools?

>> No, no, no. When you start adding in transfers, you're you're you're hitting it. I again that's what I'm trying to say. They're they're >> you just need to be aware of which ones you're using for which thing. Pa has a a use and and and they're they're experts in one area. They can't project for us. Oh, if you trans if you make a zoning change, here's how. I mean, they're they can't tell us which zoning changes. We're we're going to talk about that. They're not projecting we're going to make zoning changes. This is the data at a snapshot in time. So, I'm not saying this is wrong. I'm saying this is a different tool and the current enrollment gives us a different tool. You need to be as we're talking make sure we know what we're talking about because when we start talking about the ECC impact and 31 impact and 32 impact we're only looking at the POSA trends. We're not talking about how that actually kind of works too when you look at your current information. You just got to have both pieces together. That's all.

Right. Jeremy, are you looking at the current information also or are you just basing these off like as you are bringing us these plans? Are you basing it off of just POSA or are you also looking at the current numbers?

>> Yeah. So, we break it with the way that we wanted to structure it back in May as we walk through that framework is we did want to at least identify what is that current enrollment and then at at that time in the spring we actually knew what our grade level projections were going to be for this school year. And so the timing was good to to look at that because that is very accurate information because that that's with the microscope and then eventually you got to get to the telescope to look out into the future and then and then that's where right the cone of uncertainty starts to come into play and to to what degree we don't know what the what's going to happen what's going to change but we do that's kind of what we're going to begin continue to do. I will tell you that this you see the green and red line here for staffing guidelines for staffing guidelines for next year. We kind of base it on what we know now and when we get those grade level projections folded in in the next couple months it'll be applied to this. So we have to make staffing decisions based on now and next year opening a school looking at campus consolidation that has to we have to utilize some demographic projections as well and to ensure that a decision is sustainable over time.

>> Thank you. I just wanted to make sure that I mean you're doing exactly what what you were hoping that they were doing and they're using both of those pieces looking at current data and then using the possib projections where it's applicable and I I would hope that's what what we would all be doing and that's exactly what y'all are doing. So thank you.

>> Yeah. And what Jeremy said was right now he's not talking about consolidation discussions. those discussions you'd put the POSA and would have to have more pieces. This is for staffing >> and so I think that's great and the when we got the information on 3132 that's based just on PASA not current and those discussions will happen anyhow.

>> So thank you very much. Thanks >> Laura >> pa sorry slide 26 um can you provide some clarity for me on these positions and who they directly or indirectly work with. So um what I mean by that is on the top it says based on prek through five enrollment and then for the specials it says based on K through five. So, is that saying that the specials teachers don't work with preschool student or pre-K students?

>> That is a great question. It's actually one I had when we were doing this and that is correct. So, um the specials teachers do not work with the prek students which is why they're staffed a little bit differently.

>> Okay. So, the thought was the positions on the top half at least directly or in many indirectly are supporting those prek classrooms. Correct. than the bottom or not. Correct. Okay, that was really helpful to know. Um, and I think that one question I'm having >> because, you know, I'm trying to put the pieces together around the audits that we've had recently and seeing some opportunities for growth, especially academics or whether it was staffing. I'm also thinking about the sped audit and thinking about um some you know like how we think about what opportunities were identified in that um and how that is congruent or not like how that a how do I want to phrase this how does that work within in various levels of enrollment and is how does that inform what is feasible within certain models. We already have programs that are not available at every school and so kids have to transfer. But I'm also thinking about is there a threshold at which the majority of special education students are needing to transfer to receive their services and that becomes starts to like not feel great. Um that kids can't be served as much that many of the kids with special education services wouldn't be able to be served effectively in their home school. And I don't know that that would be the case, but I'm just thinking about like if you have um a very small special education staff, what does that look like? How do we effectively serve kids? And I think in a lot of ways, in some cases, it's beneficial because they, you know, maybe have a smaller model. They, you know, maybe have um you know, there may be some benefits there as well. But I want to make sure we're thinking about both sides of that so that we are making sure that the community understands all of the implications for some of our um special programs.

>> Absolutely. So special education staffing is completely different than the general education staffing. And so when the special ed department looks at their at our students, they look at the services that each individual student needs and how that impacts the campus so that they can staff it accordingly with the special education staff that are needed to meet those students needs. So now I will say that we did have a conversation with the principles when we were going through this process about the importance of really looking at where programs are placed and what supports are in place there to be sure that they don't um unintentionally impact the campus as a whole. And so that's something that we've talked to our department leaders about and trying to be more strategic and collaborative through those processes.

Yeah, that's what I was also wondering about was um principal feedback around that in particular and um just always wanting to be mindful. I think that also lend into, and I know this is down the road, but just thinking about any sort of transitions that come out of this, how we're being very intentional about intentional about supporting transitions um very explicitly outlining what that process would be for our special education students because those transfers are very um can can be more challenging. Um and so wanting to make sure that that's included. And I think now that I'm learning how this works, I'm going to get one more thing in there. Um um the other piece um the other piece that I was thinking about as I was reading this as a as a parent is that I would want and we may not be at this point, so again, please forgive me if I'm going off course here, but I would want to better understand what the process looks like when you hit one of these phases. So when when is this looked at? Like is it looked at on a yearly basis? Is it looked at on a rolling basis? Um, and then if so, what is the And you I know you're not going to want to be like too prescriptive, but like is there a recommended range of time within which families will be allowed to participate in feedback? Whether we're talking about mitigation or whatever we're talking about, like what does the timeline look like so that fam so that things are clear that um families can look ahead and feels like things are pretty predictable in terms of like we're going to be having this conversation. We want to start thinking about this ahead of time so that um everybody's on the same page. So, I don't know um how that plays into laying all this out, but just something that I was thinking about as I was reading through it that that is something that would be really helpful.

>> Gloria, any questions? No.

>> Okay. Um I had a question in regards to slide 21, the transfer process. Everyone knows I love our transfer process. I just have a question. Um, you know, we had this amazing presentation, was it on Monday, the course catalog thing, which I am so excited. I'm so glad y'all are doing that. That is something that has been a soapbox thing of mine. So, I love it. Thank you so much. But my question with that, I went and looked at the slides and whatnot. How did we communicate to our parents during that presentation in regards to our transfer policy? Because there's some programs that are available at our campuses that are not that are closed campuses. is I'm trying to understand how some of that was mixed into that presentation and or did we even hit on it? That's I'm just trying to understand.

>> I >> Sorry, Brian. You knew it was going to come. Y'all know I love Y'all know I love this transfer topic.

>> I was in the first row ready to go.

>> I'm just trying to like what did y'all hit on anything? I know that's, you know, y'all gave a pretty much a broad overview and I know that whole conversation was not about transfers, but just I'm just think, you know, as a parent, if my child was interested in HVAC, right? And, you know, my child was at Vist. I'm just, you know, and I can't get into this campus that has the one HVAC program, like how are we, you know, trying to tackle those problems so when we have these presentations that parents and students are are aware that that transfer policy exists and we're not denying access, right? We're trying to open up those pathways. So right now there's some exclusivity between the processes. Uh high school for example, you have several choices. So you like top to bottom, however many you have. if it's not one that's at your campus. Currently, we offer a subcampus opportunity, which we are reviewing and looking at options to which programs would be efficient to transfer fully to and which ones might still continue a subcampus model. We just weren't ready 26 27. And so what we are because we move the course selection process up, we said fill out your choice sheet. So same kind of thing the things that you're interested all those all those um processes then we will look at if there's a transfer opportunity and then work within those. So ideally when we're talking about programmatic transfers we separate you are transferring from a program that you've applied to get accepted to. We know you have space for you are going to that program and your interest starts early with those course sheets and it's different from I'm going to say my transfer but it's not mine but like it's our our parent choice is just hey we have seats somewhere so we're looking at um we we do that now with prek we do that now with dual language we did we started that last year with um IB and so it's moving from hey that interest starts early those campuses and those programs directors start to engage with families and kids to look at bringing them in, make sure that they have space and equipment and all of the things that happen and whether they transfer fully or there's a subcampus opportunity that's still looking forward, but we need to figure out which programs those are and because we have so many across the district. It was really hard to do that quickly.

No, I >> so but we yes we asked kids because it's earlier and transfers we we are moving to January for our priority our our intro district transfers but that's aligned with they've already done course sheets we do have an after um opportunity to change that just in case there's a transfer implication but we did have that discussion about hey fill out your choice sheet we're going to look at what you have we're going to look at whether the subcampus or transfer is an option we're do that more of an individual basis That's exactly the answer I was looking for. Thank you.

>> Except it's not a choice seat anymore. It's in >> course selection. Is that correct?

>> Naviance.

>> No more no more paper. I'm just >> Oh, yeah. Sorry.

>> Navian electronic voice choice sheet and Navian. Yes, sir.

>> I appreciate that. That was one thing like I'm just I'm like again I'm Thank you all so much for putting that on. I it's huge and I love that y'all are working on that. Y'all know how much I love our transfer system. I utilize it as a parent. So, thank you all so much. All right, Shade. All right. So, and it's kind of similar um I guess it's sort of similar in this slide and um I've been listening to the conversations all evening and we've been talking a lot about reszoning and trying to get above the line, below the line, between the line just it but it just still seems like we are still looking at our closed system and how to move chairs around and I'm concerned. Yes, we've talked about I mean we are I've said this before. I mean we're in a different time. We're not in a time any longer where we just sit and hope that people show up. I'm bombarded with Facebook ads for other not districts. school districts don't seem to be a few school districts but a lot of the charter schools and you click on one and oh my god then the algorithm says you're interested in education and a whole bunch of others that you didn't even know existed now start contacting you and I'm just concerned especially as I see I see a school that has it's full it's over 100% not 120 but it's over 100% But the kinder class is half the size of the fifth grade class. So next year as fifth grade rolls out, I don't know whether first grade is going to grow and it's not going to grow by that much and kinder might still be small. So I'm just wondering what we where are we going to have a plan here? I mean we we've talked about open enrollment. I thought I don't know if it has anything been rolled out yet? I don't know. But how are people like districtwide, not just campus specific, but just districtwide promoting our district through not the traditional means that we're used to, but really going um casting a wider net, letting people have us at the back of their minds or forefront of their minds, and they just see us all the time. So that when they're ready to make a decision, they're like, "Oh, that's some somewhere I can go to." I mean, think about when you want to send your kid to daycare. You go toward the place and you're used to the place and then now that might be something they think about Kinder and they're like, "You know what? I'm just going to I see openhouse here and this on my ads or in my mailbox and I'm going to go to that open house. Oh, I love it there and sign my kid up there." We're not doing that. So, those are the things I'm more concerned about about future proofing at least trying that and where that would be on this timeline. Thanks.

>> I'm with you, Shade. Um, y'all know I have a lot of kids and one thing I've noticed and it my daughter who will be going into high school next year, we started getting postcards from our zoned high school in regards to the programs they offer there. And I was like, whoa. But it wasn't schoolled. It was booster. So, this is money coming out of our parents who saw a need to try to attract the students in our zone campus. And I mean, it was pretty powerful. I got a little postcard that says, "Do you want to be, you know, guardian dancer?" And it was like personal to me. And I'm just like wondering, I see that for early college high school. I see that principal taking on that whole lead. I see certain campuses. Four points. Steve Crawford going the extra mile. Mr. cheer. I loved it. But I'm just there's so much we're asking of our principles and they're going to do everything they can for their campus, but what are we doing as a district to one take that load off those principles, but also why are our boosters sending out information on try to attract families? Like I'm just trying to understand. I mean, I love it. I felt like I was seen. It was great, but what are we doing as a district?

>> So, I'll take that one. Hi. Um um so I think we are what we we realize that there absolutely needs to be some sort of strategy and plan moving forward and this is something that our team has been working on on a weekly basis trying to move in a very fast forward motion towards um towards really focusing on this area of indistrict transfer and open enrollment that will be active January through through February and into the spring And so, um, I think that we've worked really well with Brian and, um, student support services and establishing what those timelines look like. We've now got some alignment with course scheduling so that we can figure out what that indistrict transfer looks like for our students. There's some there's just a lot of moving parts to make sure that this is executed well. So the thing that you are seeing right now with postcards and Facebook ads and and all of the collateral that's out there right now is that you have those places, those charter schools, those private schools have a place where folks can go to as a resource online digitally that showcases all of their schools, their resources, their their um all of the things that are wonderful about the places that they're trying to attract. And that's what we're lacking and that's what we're working on right now. So what we're trying to do is make things easy if they're attracted to a certain part of the district, a certain school. You have to know the cadre of things that are available to you if you are drawn to Leander ISD. And it's got to be more than just what a campus website looks like. It's got to look good. It's got to look polished. It's got to be interactive. And it's got to give parents what they want and not be frustrated with a process of what of how they're looking at it. I don't know if you want to jump in here and I know that you've done this before, Jeremy, but just how this has to be exceptional on a level that that we have not seen before or that we've experienced ourselves in what it means to attract a new type of parent to our district. And so we just want to execute it well. And it's got to be more than we've done. We've done some um some print ads. We've done um we are included in the chambers, Leander and um Cedar Park chambers with ads um promoting our for every district branding around um um uh the open enrollment and and recruitment plan, that enrollment marketing plan. And um and as we move forward um we really have been focusing on just getting folks to a landing spot where they can get all the information they need from soup to nuts from the exploration of what your campuses look like to what the district can um district can uh can offer. Did you want >> Yeah. say obviously just from one factor is just attracting those through open open enrollment and the engagement is the most important part and communication and timing all that together that that's that's the critical piece uh because when they feel valued and the attention is given to them then they're going to be because the interest is going to be there but we we must we must engage them a little bit differently because it's different than engaging someone that already lives in in the district I mean but that's just one one singular aspect aspect and uh but again what we do have is just over 42,000 advocates for for Leander ISD and so I think we need to to lean into that as as well but I think you'll see from an open enrollment um standpoint and and what we're going to to attempt to do and to to do really well. We know what we have to do. We just have to go out there and do it. But again, that's just one one aspect of of enrollment period. That's that's the thing that's going to be different u for next year. outside of what we're already doing. But I think Christina, her team is working on um everything from open enrollment to to the students that live in our in our district that we're not seeing come inside our doors.

>> There's an element of um direct communication now that we have an interest form and we see where um where we might be able to lean into in some of these areas particularly around Austin ISD and um their uh their resoning that they're experiencing. So, we're looking at those areas where we might be able to lean into. We're seeing some areas around um Hudson Bend and Travis uh Lake Travis that um that might be an area that we can we can also explore as well. So, we're being sensitive to the areas where we can we can definitely do some more specific targeting. Um but the the message is there. I think that you don't underestimate the power of our product um is number one. And so we can see that through our interest form there is absolutely um our story is telling its you saw that with a superintendent report. Um we do have a powerful story. So um it's just like what Jeremy says utilizing the 42,000 people that we have in our district to be able to market us well and be having that a part of the plan.

>> Oh, you mentioned the interest form. Where is that located and how is that being circulated?

>> That's my next question. Yeah,

>> I haven't. No, I know. But I mean, how is it being circulated to these areas that you've mentioned that are being targeted? So we're we're starting in such again we want to make sure that we can get we can get the interest form to a place where then once they get their interest and then we can get those folks within our our system so that we can have then a direct um connection with the folks that are that we're um we're marketing with that we're attracting into the system that we can collect their their data so that we can have that communication with. Um, as far as it getting sent out, it is internal right now because the focus was in district and that is the next step is then marketing outside.

>> I was just >> I just I wonder if we Oh, I wonder if we could just have an agenda item because I I just wonder if we're going to be this might take longer and I just think we have enough tonight. Maybe this could be a December 4th piece where we talk about the marketing. Um because it's not just about open enrollment, which I think is good and you've given us a lot of information, but I mean uh Dr. Gary and I both were at a fast growth uh school conference discussion um well we listened in on a discussion uh where they were talking about how um charter schools, private schools, uh micro schools, they are out there and they're actually going to marketing companies. And one of the things that was like a leading thing that caught my attention was how important it was for the comm family members to be on the campus. they need to be there to see what the product is and that's so important. Um, and then you know there are other things that could be done to help market because we're not just talking about open enrollment which is those outside of the district or or inner district moving into campuses. We also know that there are a large number of students in our district choosing alternate education. So, it just seems like there's a couple of pieces for marketing and I would I would love to have just kind of a breakdown. I'm hoping it wouldn't be a long breakdown either, right? But it's just like right now we're catching you off guard and you're having to like quickly tell us if if we had slides, I bet you could get it done in three slides or at least that would be my point is is something quick.

>> So, I'll second you on that agenda item.

>> All right. So, we have a meeting December 4th and December 11th. um right the Thursday. So, let's see how this conversation pans out and it'll either be the 4th or the 11th.

>> Okay.

>> And so, real quick, board, you're wanting um how we're marketing open enrollment. Is that can we give some clear direction? Give me some clear direction so we know where we're asking for administration. So, Christina's team is ready to come prepared. It is really um the plan oops the plans and the timeline to market our district as a whole so that one we attract people who live within the district but do not attend we attract open enrollment and then we retain our current students as well. If we could get that December 4th,

>> I I would like to add um how we're supporting our campuses in their own open enrollment journey of I know campuses are already doing that work and like you said getting them through the door. I was at Four Points Middle School two days ago and Steve Crawford is already doing the things I mean and his PTA is talking about scheduling. they are uh reaching out to HOAs and surrounding neighborhoods that are outside of the district to go present and talk. And I was like, what kind of resources are we giving them? What are we giving them? But they are full-fledged ahead because they're worried that open enrollment is going to open in February. People need to know before the holidays that this is coming so they can start making plans for the following. I mean, that's a big deal if you're going to leave your district and think about and so I I'd like to also in that same uh update talk about how what are the resources or things that we can do to support not not just what your department is doing but also what is your department doing I guess to support the PTA and the individual campuses that might want to do some outreach you know on their own.

>> Okay. So December 4th, that special meeting if we could get um just kind of you know like what Shade said, a timeline just like what the plan is

>> and then we'll go from there.

>> Okay, we're going fast and furious here. Yosi.

>> All right. Uh two things really quickly. Um one I I I one appreciate that we're focusing on student experience and learning um and kind of instructional delivery. Um and we haven't talked finances but I definitely would love um to understand the financial implications of the staffing guidelines um one as is and so transfers stay relatively stable no consolidation what's what's our savings right um and then the yes the second would be like what are the the implications on financials with consolidations thinking a one to three schools and for each you know agnostic of the schools but but just thinking of the scenarios I know it's not really clean but what would the uh implication of the new staffing models deliver on that um and the other pieces I'm seeing you know we have a couple of uh layered levers right and so we have like the the EC consolidation potentially we have boundary reszoning we have like all of these different levers that we're thinking about um potentially pulling. And so I would just like to see like a some dynamic model where we can test out some of these levers on top of each other. I don't know. I just like maybe chat EBT can help us with that. But like some kind of model where we could really just make a few decisions with a few clicks and actually see the implications on on enrollment projections with some of those levers. And so, you know, right now it feels like we're like kind of like 2D when we need to be like 4 D 8D because there are a lot of different dimensions. And so >> I if if if we need some help thinking through that, I'd love to.

>> I like that, Nico.

>> Like maybe six or seven D or something. I don't know.

>> I really like that, Nicoy, because what keeps going back into my mind is like, okay, let's give open enrollment a chance to see what it can do. But then that means that the realities of the budget means there's cuts in other places and how do those cuts then impact our ability to attract open enrollment. So all those things in my mind I keep thinking through all that as well and how those pieces influence each other. So,

>> and keeping in mind that if you look at other districts, open enrollment, Jeremy's going to be like, I told you, Gloria, open enrollment is going to take five to 10 years. It's got it has a long ramp before you really start to be able. It's not just you're going to announce it and everyone's going to be like, "Okay, next year I'm going there." It's something where, oh, I have a third grader. I'm gonna do that for middle school in three years or I I'm gonna consider that for high school. You know what I mean? It's something where a lot of the data that's coming out from other school districts that are doing this is it's it's a little snowball that's takes it needs momentum and it takes time. So, it's yes, I think we need to give it a shot, but also what what are the budget implications now and what are the budget implications knowing that it has a long runway to ramp up?

>> Well, specifically that fund this fund balance cliff is a year. Um, and so like that's >> Yeah. Five years, >> right? And >> but Gloria, I would also I would also say that I don't know what those other school districts tried. They might have just said, "We have it now and they hope and wait people show up.

>> They might not have been proactive in going after people." So, I don't know. And so, I wouldn't immediately say I mean, yes, >> I'll share my data with you. >> Okay, good.

>> I think also just in regards to the marketing, um, I feel like our community is going to take some time to getting used to as we saw what happened this summer. And because let's be honest, charters and private have endless amount of money to spend on marketing. They have a whole budget department where they spend millions of dollars. We don't have that luxury. And so I think it's important for the board when we have this discussion to be very clear in what we're looking for. And also when communications gets out there and starts doing this, we need to be behind them because it's something we've never done as a public school. But if we're going to attract students and families, then we need to do it the right way. And by doing that, we need to give clear direction to Christina's team, but also support them during this time. So, that's all I'm going to ask from you all on that.

>> Yeah. I'll also add that um some of the data that's come back and I will share my data with you. And you know, Jeremy, I collected all this data so that I could say, "Haha, you're wrong, Jeremy." and instead I collected all this data and it was like Jeremy was right. I'm just going to put my data over here because he was right. Um but a lot of it too was the current families sometimes your your current school isn't super excited about open enrollment. And so when they start seeing a lot of the marketing and a lot of those pieces, your current your u in district families, it's it's a push and pull, right? They want that more enrollment, but they also want the exclusivity of my child should get the lead on that play because I live in the district. My child should be on that team. There's only so many spots on that team and now those are spots that are going to be shared. And so, um, a lot of the other trustees that I have talked to have said, be prepared for those hard hard things that are going to come to the board because there are limited number of roles in the school play. there's a num limited number of seats on that robotics team and when you open it up to students outside of your district, those are other conversations and other struggles that that we're also going to have to to kind of mend with.

>> I'm gonna wait.

>> I was just going to add on to that. Um again, you can see what I think about a lot. Um, I don't know where this would fall in here, but what transfers look like for kids in special programs, particularly special education. Um, because I know in parts of the country where there is a lot of open enrollment, it's open for everyone except for those kids. They hit a lot of barriers um transferring in. Not not officially. um it happens because there's not a good policy in place that makes sure that there's um access to transfers for kids in special education who have kids who have IEPs. So, just wanting to make sure that we are choosing a different path um and making sure that there's that we're thinking through that very intentionally in in this process. So, I I have a question on we had a discussion on prek and I'm just wanting to know when does that come back to the board because Anna, I thought you asked and Shard asked a really good question. I mean, it's it's great that we have prek on the campuses and it helps with the enrollment and bringing in the kiddos, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's yielding the PLC's and the upper grades until it metriculates through and then how does all that work and and really how is that helping with the staffing models? If that's if that's a really expensive program and it's not really helping with learning and it's really going to end up not then what do the hubs look like? What do the hubs yield for us? like I just feel like we just haven't had enough time to really talk about the difference between onampus versus hubs and and I know you you know we're going to pilot I guess the north and see how that looks but it I just feels like it might be beneficial to kind of have a little bit more of that information as we continue to talk about um prek and and it might end up being a hybrid throughout the district. Um again I will I will say this I said it you know 89th session the bills passed uh learning is going to look different education will look different from now on and and you had said you know I've heard people say blockbuster Netflix comparison right? And so how do we keep um innovating with the times and so prek hubs may be the perfect answer um and it really doesn't um hurt the campuses that much because we're going to do something else and we've got all these other things but how do we unless we have a conversation and I'm just curious when when will we have that part of the conversation. So if you want an agenda item then I can second you but I do agree that we it would be very helpful for us and this is not identifying any campuses but it's just if we have this number of this would be a good number of prek hubs to have and finding a loca finding locations for them would be an exercise much later but it's really if we consolidate them here is what student learning can look like here is what um teacher team PLC's these can look like and also having the good number of students on each campus um or in each hub. And then the last one will be the the financial impact as well >> because having prek spread about with smaller classrooms I assume is more expensive. When when you use the term hub, are you talking about like the early childhood com like the the school?

>> So basically like what we have now a community like at Fabian has a >> Yes. So like Deer Creek Fabian. Yes.

>> Okay.

>> But a bigger concentration.

>> So like there's small there's little ones all over the place.

>> So So you're talking about So I don't know how many we have right now. How many prek?

>> 19. I think 19 >> 20.

>> So So reducing that maybe to 13 or 14 or something like that. Six or something.

>> It it just feels that this might be one moving part that's vital. And if we start rolling on all these other pieces and then prek comes or that discussion comes later, then it's like, oh, we had made it all on these numbers and these thoughts and and prek and your early childhood learning could really impact uh some of these other decisions that we're going to make. So, I just feel like that discussion has to preede the other discussions. So am I I just want to get clarification that are y'all asking for a complete early childhood model discussion

>> because that's essentially what the south and the central I need to try to understand what y'all are asking for because when we look at the grand scheme of things yes these are students there's 1638 students right I don't think we need to stop the work we're doing to have an in-depth discussion on the future of prek but I'm trying to understand y'all know I love me some ECC's right if I could have an ECC here and here. I would do that, but I'm just trying to understand what direction y'all are needing and how what conversation are you wanting to have as far as prek in regards to the LRP. I'm trying to understand, can you tell me like is it you're wanting to make an ECC in the central ECC in the south? Like help me understand. Sorry, Nicoy. Just kidding.

>> It's not ECC's. Okay, go ahead.

>> Well, I it's I think I have the same question, but it's so let's look at some. So, if I don't know, I'm afraid to call out a specific campus. If you see a school where the number of prek students overall is lower, are you wondering about efficiency but also student experience where there may be one teacher and can we consolidate a prek program with another I'm sorry an early childhood community with another early childhood community for efficiency and a better student experience.

>> Exactly. And perhaps can that be at a school right in the middle of those two lines where it can or is that

>> it's not about the two lines. It's really is just

>> yeah you'll figure out where it's best they should be best located and it's not necessarily about the two lines but it's really about the efficiency.

>> So just more like let's revisit our communities and see if we can be more streamlined.

>> Yes. I mean, I've heard from prek teachers that are concerned about the small sizes and the small teams as well.

>> Gotcha.

>> Like, it's not it's it really should be looked at.

>> But don't we have I know this happened at one campus this year where we didn't have enough prek students and we moved them over to another campus. Like that happens already. There's stuff in guidelines for that.

>> That that happens in >> Great. Right. Right.

>> I guess my question is I Sorry, Ann. I'd love to hear from you because I know y'all did prek these communities back in 2021. Y'all know this was one of those things I wanted to die on a hill cuz I hated it. But I'm just trying to understand. I know y'all did this whole revamp in 2021. And then I guess this kind of leads to my next question is so we have this ECC, right? When the ECC does fill up, I'm hoping it does. What is where do those other kids go? So it kind of goes to what you're saying like are we going to what does this process look like, Erin? Like help help us understand. I think what they're asking for is, you know, combining campuses to be better efficient. What can you give us some feedback what you've heard tonight in regards to this?

>> I think I can. So, um, I mean, those are all really good questions, right? Because the ECC is the first time we're doing this. So right now when we're looking at all the campuses that we have zoned which are all the campuses north of 2243 that are going to go to the ECC we're starting out opening around 567 and 600 is capacity right that's as we if we look at it today um so one of the things we could do somebody here said you know well we could have a hybrid model that's what we will have Right. When we open up the ECC, we're still going to have our smaller communities. Um so we may have to look at which of these campuses can have their students go back to um their campus so that we don't um get too full at the ECC. As far as opening up other early childhood centers, I mean, that's the beauty in getting to decide. I mean, I I would love that. I definitely understand that we have some um early childhood communities right now that are low in numbers. And one of the reasons we went towards early childhood communities years ago is

Because we had one prek class here on this campus, early childhood special ed over here on this campus. We didn't have PLC's. We didn't have teachers sharing their knowledge together. We weren't sharing resources. We were very individual programs spread across the district and we thought, well, what what can we do, you know, to to bring teachers together to learn from one another and to do better with our resources and offer better instruction to kids.

And it was with our um early childhood communities. And in the fall of 2020, I believe is when we brought everybody, including our early childhood special ed students together on communities. Um, which has greatly helped with our resources. Um, we had teachers traveling between schools in middle of the day without lunches and planning time because they were moving all around. So, we've made great strides there. Um, and we can continue to do it just based on what those needs are. If we need to look at a central campus then we look at a central campus, right? We we really the way we have set up communities is where is the need, where do we have room, right? And without making three and four year olds have to travel very far.

So I have a question regarding um the ECC, the early childhood center, the the one to be opened. So Baghdad students are going they're are going to be moved there as well. The early childhood, >> that's currently what we're talking about. Yes. >> Okay. But how about the dual language? Are they going to stay on the Baghdad campus or? >> So, our current model is all of our three and four year olds are all together with their like peers and then whatever supports they need, whether that be um ESL, dual language, special ed services, they all get it together with their peers. So, yes, the whole group would move together and we would have dual language services at the ECC. Okay.

Because I was just wondering if there was a thought to because we talked about Fabian dual language and read and I was just wondering if there was any thought given to having Baghdad if the teachers also whether they they think that that's helpful if they should be on the campus, the dual language campus as opposed to on a separate campus. Well, so most of our feedback right now from our our um teachers at Baghdad, they're excited to go to the new campus again to be with early childhood altogether.

So, when you come back and you're going to talk to us on December 4th about um the the um enrollment threshold and mitigation strategies. My question kind of is, you know, just to inform that when you bring that back information that would help me um would be to know like the things that I'm asking is if we need to go to a consolidation or repurpose model and I don't want to know right now we had if we hadn't decided the the thresholds you can't tell us which campuses. I just want to know does administration have a recommendation for the criteria on that? How do you um choose? Like let's say you have um and we know of one area that has a cluster of schools. How are you going to choose which school if they're if they're all in this area? How is that choice going to be made or is that something that you go back to the community and you say we have this option and does the community weigh in? And that's my other thing is how does the community weigh in when that uh consolidation repurposing thing I mean is that going to be that um we go to them as a district and say let us know what you'd like to see your campus uh become and and and then we get that feedback and go from there or is that something where we say oh we have these options here's what could be what do y'all think? So, I'm just curious when y'all when y'all come back and and talk about those thresholds for um triggering that repurpose or that consolidation. I I would just like that just that little bit of extra piece on what you're thinking about so far for some of those criterias of like what is that going to look like? Then um just in general our where you are been thinking about that.

The other one is you talk about m you say mitigation factors and when I think of mitigation I think of public private partnerships that could be mitigation, right? If we have public private partnership that could bring in additional students, you and I have talked about tons of different type of models or trying to think outside of the box. Um, could there be a magnet program that doesn't necessarily need all that same staff but attracts more enrollment? Could there be uh grade stacking? When we're hitting these thresholds, does the mitigation strategy include letting the community also tell you what else they could see or how else they want to see it if not the traditional model? And I'm just uh curious about those things. You don't have to answer that now unless you want us answer. But those are the things I'm curious when you bring back information to us.

>> I'll I'll throw on to that um some as we're bringing that back for discussion. I would be real careful in letting communities choose which school they think because I think if I went to a school I would say not my school but that school and I think that school would say not my school that school. And so I would be I would hope we would have some type of rubric that that y'all you know you would make some type of recommendation when there's a cluster. I think it's engaging the school and what do we do with the campus, you know, is how I'd really hope we'd engage that community. Okay, if this is the campus that you're recommending, how what's our plan then to engage that community and what happens next with that building and and bringing some of those partnerships, bringing, you know, is it a library? Is it a think all the things that we've talked about? But, um, I would be concerned about saying, okay, it's going to be one of these, and y'all figure it out because I think most people are going to say, not mine, but that that's cool.

I and and then one of the things I know we've talked about grade stacking in different ways. I one of the things I'd like to maybe when you if that's something that is going to be brought back to us know what the implication that is from teaching and learning because that's not the curriculum that we currently provide and if it means retooling our curriculum for grade stacking do we have extra teaching and learning people that are that were able to take off of their current duties to allocate them to creating a new type of learning model and how long would it take for them, you know, if we designated a team do we have a team that were able to I know what you keep telling me is Gloria we don't have enough people to do all the things and so I'd like us to think about how that works when we take our existing teaching and learning team and we say okay, you're not going to support our traditional model because we need y'all to create a new model. What how does that impact the system and how long it would take to create a different learning model like that, you know, so that we would be able to implement that that being part of that discussion as well. And can I absolutely because I I want to say I gave examples um and I was just giving examples because >> I'm I'm don't have a degree in education. Um, and I think those are really good points. It's like I don't want to tell y'all, oh, tell me what a magnet program looks like. Tell me how you're going to work with the community and letting them choose. I'm giving you examples of things that I wonder, but I want administration to tell us what you think, right? Like I'm not telling you to bring back A or B, but when I think of mitigation strategies before you close, to me it's like what else can you do besides a traditional model based on y'all's information, based on your expertise, and you might come back and stacking grades might not be in there because that's not something y'all would recommend. Or it might I don't know. Or there might be something else I haven't even recommended, right? Or thought.

>> I think I think about a lot of things with this honestly. I know in the spring, correct me if I'm wrong, Jeremy, that we our timeline has us to spend some time looking more deeply and what can these long-term think whatever it's going to be that's really outside the box is going to really take a lot of thought and time to come up with. The other thing I think about is what does it take to get it going? Then what does it take to support it long term? Because we can get it moving. Um, you know, we technically have some STEM schools right now, but is the support sustained? You know, how do we plan for that from a staffing at at learning or teaching and learning department? And then the other is what is the market demand, which connects back to what Christina was talking about. How do we market things? But it's also what is the demand? Like if I make a lot of red sweaters that I think are great, but everybody wants blue, it doesn't do anybody any good, right? So, how do we find out what parents are looking to? That's where I'm looking at these enrollments at what what's attracting people to charters and what what what can we how can we be competitive.

>> and and perhaps when we have that discussion on mitigation as you said maybe it's not all the pieces maybe it's just your outline of here are some of the areas we're starting to explore.

>> I think you have to think of this 10-year long-term plan that we've talked about as well. I mean that this is deep long-term thinking. So it will take time. That's where it's this what are we doing for funding cliff is in a year like you. So how do we manage that and plan long term is how do we balance those?

>> That's what I keep thinking about is also just some um the word um conclusions for families. Like I just think like I think it's important for us to gather information but also want to but also balancing that yes we think long term and all. So yes, it's more of a yes and than anything but thinking about is what's going to be part of our short-term financial plan or not. And I think that's the piece that we really need to provide some answers. I I just um I just either way.

>> I agree with you, Laura. I mean, we can get up here and say, "Go give me a K through eight. Go give me an IV school, a monastery school. It all costs money." And we know our financial reality right now. And it's kind of a balance, right? Like we want to attract students, but you got to sometimes spend money. So, it's one of those conversations. So, I know six seven stop. I do know Nakosi asked for this. I I think it was last board meeting or the meeting before in regards to not only this time frame we have here, but can we lay the financial timeline on top of that so we can get an idea of where we're at because that cliff is coming and that cliff, I mean, we can sit here all day and talk about not closing schools, go to a low staffing model, but that cliff is here and once we go down that cliff, nothing's going to matter. And so I really would like to see what NicoSi asked for that financial timeline also lined up with what we got here.

Um I am curious at some point I think we're going to need to um you gave us kind of an overview of that um what happens in the enrollment trends when you put in um ECC and and elementary 31 32 and you'll get us the projections for 31. Um, but I I think that information is important too. Um, and and maybe it's not as immediate. I we've talked about some immediate things here, but I think that's important to think about when we're when we're wondering about how are we dealing with our overenrolled and then with the stable enrollment, does 32 put more campuses in a tender position? And we and if that's the case, I'm still going to say, do we need the traditional model? Can a 32 happen? But could it look different? Could it look like a I don't know. Again, educating experts. I I I would K3 I don't even know that works. K8, a small K8, not because I know the footprint of a traditional K8 won't work. But if we're talking about stable enrollment, what does a smaller K8 look like? Again, I don't know. I'm going to let the experts, but I think that conversation is important, too, as we're talking about the future of the district at some point.

I will say the handouts y'all gave us, I I'm over here like ECC is going to solve all of our problems, but I was kind of amazed that even with ECC opening, you still need a elementary 31 based on these projections. Like I can't get over how fast that area is growing. Like North receives little to no. So that was just really eye opening to me because I'm like, "All right, we don't have to build this, but it's in this is pretty here." I this was I think for me telling cuz like when you're talking about 32 there's that conversation but I went and pulled you know based on these projections I mean it's really putting one campus under and if we're looking at the bigger scheme of things we seem to stabilize at around 500. So for me, when I see this handout that we got, this gives us kind of almost that stability that we're asking for as a board that 5600 5600 student model. And so thank you for including this because this was this is like um if this was something I was like, ah, we're not going to build a 31. No, we need a 31 otherwise poor Tarvin and North are going to explode and so is Aken. So thank you for this.

The reason why I think we we need a discussion on this what she's talking about is because um early childhood numbers are also included in here but early childhood is if they're going to early childhood center but or maybe it's going to be full and they're going to have to stay on their campus. So those are not clear yet but I I think the impact of this uh table we have assumes early childhood is fully on the campus and not somewhere else.

>> yeah so so those scenario should um they represent um those campuses listed at the top attending ECC and so those precares have been pulled out of those numbers and so you'll see a reduction. So it kind of gives you a little bit of capacity. But um again those are good clarifying um questions and I will go in to your point. There's the good thing that we do here and that is u way long before I came here doing a demographic update every year because you'll see the difference if I if you look at that same projection last year dynamics change some the developments speed up some slow down and so that's why you kind of right set each and every year around this time. So then you can see what decisions you may need to make in the future.

>> And then the other the other aspect of that can also be timing. So the timing of when they not not if but when and so that's >> that's another reason to have that discussion.

>> Does this have every like how does that work? because it says these are the schools that are going to go to the ECC, but we've already heard the ECC is going to be full within a year or two. So, does does it have them indefinitely going to the ECC, which wouldn't be realistic.

>> So, so it so you'll see ECC as a projection.

>> That is the projected prekers in those attendance areas.

>> So, >> that are attending. So it would have ECC not really hitting it has it hitting 62829. So >> that but that Okay.

So then here's my other question about this and please just tell me if I'm off topic here. Um, what would this look like if we try to be more strategic with pulling from the campuses that are going to hit over capacity faster so that we could potentially delay or, you know, like I I don't know. I'm just thinking about some of the schools on here don't hit red at all. Um, and maybe that's because they're pulling to the ECC. I don't know. But >> some of it has to do with that. Yes. >> But I'm just thinking about like maybe some of them I'd like you know what would it look like if we I don't know. I'm just thinking about if we could be more strategic with how we pull and like what I would hate is if we are pulling from a campus and then two or three years in we're like oh we need you to go back because you have room and this school. So like trying to anticipate that because the North's had a lot of back and forth. So if we can try to avoid that, that's the other piece.

>> Yeah. I think it and one variable that you're picking up on is the north where all the growth is. Um it's the most vulnerable area we have in the district, right? And so we're trying to manage that both with an ECC and potentially elementary 31 to balance that. Another component that we have to fold in is just proximity and location. And I think the location that is currently with the ECC, I think it's in a good location because it kind of is in the center of multiple campuses. Eventually, it's too far, right? You start reaching too far down to the south. But right now, I believe that we're balancing those enrollments with the ECC. Just understanding that there's a lot of students that aren't prekers moving into those neighborhoods. And so that's where you'll see some of the those enrollments pop popping back up even without the precares attending.

>> Absolutely. And I think just keeping in mind sorry um that even 110 cap like percent is big. Um so you know 961 kids at 111% is really big. So, I don't know. I'm kind of contradicting myself here, but just trying to um >> use the resources we have >> while also thinking about um >> Yeah. >> impact. >> Yeah. >> Because I mean, I'm looking at >> Tarban in a few years, it's at 130% with ECC. So, do we need to think about pulling more? I don't know. And yeah, so >> yeah, I think you're right. Even in when if elementary 31 comes online, then it's attendance zoning, it's an opportunity to kind of maybe balance some of those enrollments at that time just with targeted reszoning as well. Um, and so it's a consideration that we'll that we'll make there. And in 31, what does that look like from a prek standpoint as well? Maybe there's an opportunity there. So,

>> and and this goes back to the question I asked at the very beginning. And I just I don't know how we're gonna I know we need to walk carefully through it, but we're when we start talking about what does ECC have an impact on. Well, currently when you look at Tarven though, I mean this has Tarven at 840, but our number at Tarvin doesn't have it. Well, Tarvin's actually bigger. There's another one. Yeah, but that's bigger. And so, but there's some where it's like currently it's high and the numbers are lower. In fact, when I looked at it, our demographic. So, when we're looking at this number, >> and I'm comparing this to what our current is, >> 20 of them are actually going to be lower than what's on this sheet. Eight of them will be higher according to this and this. Like, I'm trying to look at them together and trying to balance. And I don't know if this is going to play out, so y'all can tell us next time. But I just I think that's important to think about is if eight of them are going to be higher, but 20 of them lower, then how does ECC really impact? And does it make some that are lower even lower? And I think on 31, I think it makes those that are lower really lower. And so I just I want to make sure I understand, you know, kind of our projections as as we're thinking about that. And and then for those ones that are um overenrolled, what does a targeted reszone look like when you put that on top of this ECC or 31, right? I want to be very careful though because the north it's there's a lot of traffic and there's a lot of infrastructure up there and it's easy to say, hey, go from this campus to this campus and I just want to be very careful because that is the one section of our district that is sliced and dice for feeder patterns. And I just want us to be very careful on that.

>> Agreed.

>> Again, and and and like you g like you said at the very beginning, when you talk about consolidation, when you talk about a zone, these are children's community schools. They're families community schools. These are all very careful topics we should weigh in. It shouldn't be taken lightly. We're talking about prek. Do we do prek hubs? Do we do the ECC's? What is I mean there's a lot of like the the human capacity our kiddos like loving our school and wanting them to love learning and wanting to come back and our parents loving this are very important but I do also want to try to balance that with we're also trying to have to figure out how to use resources the best we can. Um so yes I think we need to and keep those both in mind. Okay. Any other questions?

>> I think we are ready. We're done.

>> And and if I if I may, can I summarize what hopefully we're going to.

>> I was about to ask that. Yes. Yes, sir. Go for it.

>> And so we we have the thresholds. And so the only thing I put on the floor right now is if there's anything that you need administration to consider with those thresholds when we when we do bringing them back on on to discuss them on on the fourth and of course we had mitigation strategies which is going to look there's going to be different buckets within mitigation strategies especially when we get to to Trish and your idea of just innovative programming. Um obviously that'll be a bucket but there's other things that will go into that that will be discovered over the spring as we get that focus group together. We have marketing details kind of and the timeline associated with with that um financial timeline. We'll figure out how we're going to fold that in, but we'll provide that in in some meaningful way. Um and then the only thing I need to know is if there's additional from a prek standpoint, early childhood standpoint, if we want to bring any of those details um back to us, sorry, back to you. Yes, y'all asked for I was trying to get clarification whether y'all wanted to make like an ECC model or we just combining them. I guess Aaron, would you be able to get us that information by December 4th as far as what does um cons I hate I say hate you consolidating the early childhood hubs if do you think you could get that information to us because I'm just worried it's a whole different model for y'all. I just don't want to put you on the spot. I just want to make sure I understand what you're asking.

>> I'm I'm not I'm not quite understanding. Can y'all tell us what to do?

>> Is there a lot of communities, >> some are much smaller where the class between the classroom sizes or the team sizes are really small. So collaboration is challenging um for the teachers and the small class sizes um like really small also mean that it's we're providing a very high cost product and the the students there's there might be not really that much of an impact to student learning if they're slightly bigger if we consolidate um a number of these communities. And so it was basically taking a look at the communities, seeing what we can consolidate, not necessarily where, but just these can be consolidated and then coming back to us with right now we're at what 20 communities 26 and or 26 campuses aside from those are going to ECC. Yes, we can reduce the rest to some number. And then here is what um the cost will be the cost if.

>> yeah I before we commit to the fourth can we just go back and take a look because I'm I'm looking at this chart and you can look at the numbers and there are some with small numbers but then when you start looking at location so the closest campus to consolidate and that's what I need to we need to study this deeper more deeply it it could be something fairly quickly that we could bring back by the fourth but then as we dig in. It may not. So, I don't know if we can follow up.

>> No, I realize this is a I mean, this is a heavy thing we're asking like I'm I think what I y'all are asking for is a complete different model than what y'all are doing now.

>> I I don't >> like we're combining, right, is what it sounds like.

>> I think you're just looking at what where can we almost be efficient within our prek our early childhood model?

>> That's the that's the question.

>> And I think that's what I want to see. I it could be a fairly decent like we could bring some stuff back maybe on the fourth but it could get complicated really easily too. Correct me if I'm wrong Erin like as you start looking at this like let me I'm trying to find a good example like if you look at at um go back so Cyprus 23 and uh Bush 42. Yeah, it'd be great if we could put those together except for we know those are in vastly different places. So can we there could be a whole domino effect if you start looking at efficiency.

>> Yeah, I'm not look that's not what I'm asking that obviously not I mean Cypress and Nomin right next to each other. You can look at those two if if we have to call out names of campuses. So there are other campuses that I've seen that are close to each other that that are clearly close to each other that you can look at, but that's just a thought.

>> Yes.

>> Erin, I have a question for you. Have you heard some of the complaints that Shade is um hearing as far as like not being able to do like a full PLC like you know some of these campuses are early childhood hubs where they are a little smaller. Have you.

>> No, I haven't. I haven't heard any complaints from our smaller e um EC communities. Usually what we're having to learn is that some of our early childhood communities have 12 teachers. So it is a grade level with 12 teachers. They absolutely love it, but PLC's aren't made to be with 12 teachers. So learning how to divide up and make smaller PLC's, right? That's usually the feedback that I'm getting where our campuses need support on how do we have PLC's? How would we divide, you know, a team up to have PLC's that are optimal?

>> So, right. So, that's where I'm going is like you could combine or you could almost split one and move it somewhere else. Like it could be it just depends on how it all plays out, I guess. I don't know. I mean, could there be a quick answer to do we have some early childhood communities that are close to each other that we can bring together? Yes. Do I know by December 4th the long-term impact of that? No.

>> Right. Is that something you we could just kind of start talking about just.

>> Absolutely.

>> You know, as we go further into our timeline, right? You know how much I love our ECC in the north. just something I it sounds like over here y'all are wanting something just to be more efficient in regards to prek and making sure we're giving that ultimate student experience. So just kind of I guess do your thing. You know how to do this. And.

>> can I just say though that December 4th is only like four business days from now.

>> Yeah.

>> And so we have some limited capacity with what we can bring back by then. That's fair. Um, and my my question, um, I have nothing different other than I I've heard Anna say several times, why are we not all on, you know, the ECC's? I love ECC's. Let's do them. And yeah, and you're you're always going to be like that. But if if that's going to be a direction that impacts some of these numbers and some of the discussions, if if we're going to look for efficiencies, that's going to impact some of these numbers. So, I just wanted to have enough of a little piece. So, that's yeah, that's why I'm second just enough of that conversation so it helps inform us as we move forward because obviously what you showed us here is is prek impacts a whole lot of these campuses. And when you start talking about moving a community, you've got some big impacts going on. And so if if I keep hearing different discussions of what about this with prek and what about this with prek, I would just like to make sure I have enough information of what we're doing so we can have more discussions.

>> I'm not giving d I don't I mean I want an ECC but I'm not giving direction. Just want to make that clear. Like I still think we can do the work. Um like I said it's 1600 students and 42,000 students. Like it does impact us but I don't think my job is to go tell Aaron where I want a pre-K hub or we need to do an ECC. I want to be very clear that I'm not doing that. I just want us to make sure we have a robust prek system that's benefiting all students. And I think you guys kind of heard what we're looking for. And I think I trust you enough and Jeremy enough to bring us back something that is an efficient prek model that is serving all of our students. All right, board members. Any other questions? All right, we are done with this agenda item. If y'all have any other questions, you want to dig deeper into prek, I know Aaron would love to talk to you all day about it. Thank y'all so much. We appreciate y'all allowing us to ask all the questions and y'all giving us space. Jeremy, Rachel, Chris, Aaron, thank y'all so, so much. Board members, we will now move to 83. consider approval of purchase of attendance credit and delegation of authority to obligate the district board members. This was originally on consent item, but we're bringing it back for an action item. So, I'm pretty sure y'all are pretty selfaware of what this item is. So, if I can get a motion as soon as we can, that would be great. I make sure I've got the right one. I move the because I've read the memo and the update, so I have no questions. Y'all gave us tons of notice on this one. Um, I move the board of trustees approve the agreement for the purchase of attendance credit. Oh, this is really long. For the 2025 2026 school year and further move the board delegate contractual authority to obligate the school district under Texas Education Code TEC 11.1511C4 to the superintendent solely for the purpose of obligating the district under TEC48.257 257 and TEC chapter 49 subchapters A and D and the rules adopted by the commissioner of the education as authorized under TEC49.06. Um this includes approval of the agreement for the purchase of attendance credit or the agreement for the purchase of attendance credit. Seems like the same thing. Netting chapter 48 funding is in parenthesis. So yeah, there we go.

>> I second. A motion from Trish, a second from Gloria. Any discussion? All in favor? Seven eyes. Motion passes. Next board members, we're going to move to 8 A4. Consider approval of resolution casting votes for an individual to TCAD and WCAD board of directors.

>> We've also gotten this in board.

>> Yep. This was all in your board memo. So, I'm going to need a motion, please. I move the board of trustees approve the resolution casting its 155 votes for Elizabeth Elizabeth Mononttoya to serve on the tech Travis central appraisal district TCAD and approve the resolution casting at 710 votes to be split with 355 votes for John Lux and 355 votes for Lisa Burkeman to serve on the Williamson central appraisal Williamson central appraisal district WCAD board of directors I second.

>> A motion from Trish a second from Gloria any Discussion board members. All right. All in favor? Seven eyes. Motion passes. Next board members, we're going to move to 8 A5 2025 2026 budget update. Pete, take it away.

>> All right. Uh you have a a packet or information in the in the in the board agenda or board packet. Just basically give you a quick update on the 2526 uh school year. We have updated our revenue estimate. There's only two numbers that change on our on our whole uh the whole year. We have an increase in revenue about 4.2 million. That is due to the over 65 whole harmless provision and we're still waiting as still an estimate. Uh we will have final numbers here in uh uh we'll have the best numbers we'll have available in December which should be really really really accurate and then end of January uh the comprollers office will verify those numbers. There's usually a minor minor tweak which is not significant typically but we'll see uh this year and then TA will rerun those numbers in early February and then that will lead us to know exactly kind of what our values are for this year and what that does for our funding and then that will lead to the next conversation at a later time concerning any hold harmless requests with funding on House Bill 2. Uh but so revenue to go for it two 4.2 million our recapture had a a minimum decrease of about 200,000. Uh so our deficit uh that we adopted the budget with right over 20 million is now right at 1516 and these numbers have have these four million has been reflected in prior numbers uh when we had our budget conversation. So just want to give you an update. More than happy to answer any questions on that.

>> You said 1516. It says 15813509. Did I read it correctly?

>> Well, if I looked at the right number I looked at the number two numbers two above that. You're right. You are correct. I didn't look at the right number and I'm not wearing my glasses.

>> It's fine. I've got cheaters. Um >> they're in my pocket >> when I'm looking at the fund balance uh surplus deficit now. Yay. We're moving in the right direction which is instead of -20 it's at58. This does not include from when I'm looking at the letter doing my homework. Make sure I'm looking at this does not include that 10.5 million funding that we're still anticipating. I just want to know like are you I would be careful using the word anticipated where you at where because we were in discussions right.

>> yeah we got the 4.2 million due to a separate hold harmless provision due to the homestead exemption increasing from 100,000 to 140,000 >> right >> and the over and then the 50,000 on the over 65 piece. So that that's where that 4.2 2 million is absolute best case scenario would be if we even got the 10.5 that 4.2 is included in that and we would get the remainder and that is absolute best case scenario that I am not forecasting nor participate nor estimating.

>> Well that's that's what I'm curious about. So, we sent a letter to Commissioner or there was a letter from our lawmakers to comm Commissioner Morath. Um, and in our resolution, we say we want our funding and we we say that 10 million. Um, but we're thinking now it's like it's 6 million, but now we're not going to hold our breath anymore. Is that kind of where we're at? Well, we shouldn't be holding our breath anyway. You know what I mean?

>> We're not going to hold our breath. Uh, but we will have a much better understanding once we get these number. I should get these numbers about December 15th, December 16th, December 17th. And then I said there'll be a minor change between what the comproller approves. Once districts have those numbers, all 10 of us districts have those numbers, run those templates, then we will we will uh we've already met once, but we will update our numbers, make sure they're fairly solid, because right now TA's concern was these numbers were based on forecasts. Some districts may forecast better than others. Some may do a really good job and have a curveball thrown at them this year with values and all the changes that occurred. So the TEA and the commissioner felt it best. Hey, let's wait till January. Wait till everybody knows their their the certified values and know the exact what T2 and T17 values will be and the comproller has verified those numbers and that's what TA will use when they run the the the template. So once that's done, which should be if you remember a couple years ago when I first got here back to the whole recapture, well the same thing happens about February 3rd, February 4th, February 5th, they rerun all the numbers TEA with the certified numbers. So that changed our recapture payment. we verified and now this will do the same thing and we will know exactly what house bill two what we were held are hold harmless or we were not held harmless and then the commissioner says uh and we will anticipate coming back in January and getting our legislators and everybody else to rewrite more letters to to re-emphasize and that's what we've been requested to do to have the commissioner now hey you've got final data now look at it now run and and tell us if we're not if we got dinged or we weren't uh properly funded with house bill 2 that's where that that But so this is a separate hold harmless provision that got us that 4.2 uh in revenue.

>> Any other questions, board members? Nope. Awesome. Thank you so much, Pete.

>> You're welcome.

>> It is 10:27 p.m. and the board will now go into close session for the purposes permitted by Texas Government Code 551071, consultation with attorney regarding pending or contemplated litigation or time attorney client privilege matter. Wow. Texas Government Code 551074, personnel deliberation regarding resignations, terminations, employment, reassignment, duties, and evaluation of personnel public officers. Texas Government Code 551.0821, deliberation regarding matters whereby personal identifiable information regarding one or more students will be disclosed. Texas Government Code 551.074, deliberation regarding superintendent contract. Texas Government Code 551.074, deliberation and consideration of employment of chief human resource officer. No action will be taken in close. Any action related to close session agenda items will be taken during open session.

It is 11:31 p.m. and the board is returning to open session. Board members, do you have any motions related to close session agenda items? Yes, ma'am, I do. Administration recommends the board of Oh, nope. Um, I move that the board of trustees accept the recommendation of Ra Rachel Mackey for Is that Mackey or McKay? >> Mackey. Okay. I wanted to make sure I was saying that right. Recommendation of Rachel Mackey for chief human resources officer two-year term employment contract for personnel additions as presented in accordance with the salary scale policies and contract of Leander Independent School District for the 202526 school year. Congratulations.

>> A motion from Gloria, a second from Trish. Any discussion? No discussion. All in favor? Seven eyes. Motion passes. Congratulations, Rachel.

>> Congratulations, Rachel. And board members, it is 11:32 p.m. And having no further business, this meeting of the Lander ISD board of trustees is adjourned.