Transcription
A story and tell you guys something that's been bothering me, um, about Rob McCoy. Stick on him. Other than the fact that he lies and he proclaims to be a pastor, is the fact that less than 36 hours after Charlie died, less than 36 hours, exact time, at 10:34 p.m. Eastern on September 11th, the Turning Point USA Wikipedia received a rather interesting update. Pastor Rob McCoy, who had previously never been featured on their Wikipedia page, somehow got his own heading. Just amazing. Let's check out that fresh entry.
Now, it reads, "Rob McCoy and Charlie Kirk founded Turning Point USA Faith, TPUs Faith together. Along with being a Pentecostal pastor in the Calvary Chapel Association, McCoy is the co-chairman of TPUs faith. Aligned with the Christian right, McCoy inspired Kirk to amalgamate Christianity and social conservatism during the CO9 pandemic. McCoy was known for speaking out against prohibitions on the holding of in-person church services."
Now, the hardest part of being me is that I came up to Turning Point USA. So, I just know these lies so quickly. Okay? No, Rob McCoy was not the person who inspired Turning Point USA faith. Actually, if anybody could be credited with that, that was that was like way back in the day at Liberty University. Actually, those pastors, those conversations, I was there for that. We should do like a faith division, whatever it is. He didn't inspire it.
And what's so interesting about that entry is that when you then click it, this is how you know this is absurd. When you click the actual notations that are there, when it says he's the co-founder, what are you talking about? Since when is he the co-founder and also says that he was the chairman? When you click it, that article, which they pretend is a note, hit the 54, Skyler, not 55. Okay, that's from November 24th, 2024. That's their justification for saying he was a founder. Nowhere in that article does it say that he's the founder or the chairman. Nowhere. They just put a fake article, a real article that never said this. And they're like, "Oh, now it's sourced. It's here forever." Because nobody ever does their homework and we're Wikipedia or Wikipedia. So you can't question this obviously.
And then you can see the second citations that are used, uh, September of the dates of them. September 10th, September 2025. So it's brand spanking new, you guys. Still has tags on it. Less than 36 hours later. Now you might be thinking, trying to justify that as I was, might be rationally wondering.