They Can't Hide The Files...

Do you have whiplash yet? The story surrounding Jeffrey Epstein continues to change as the Trump administration changes tactics yet again in what seems to be another attempt to try and sweep this whole thing under the rug. Maybe potentially. I'm not exactly sure. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm just a guy who sees patterns and can do basic math.

The incumbent administration is doing whatever they possibly can to confuse people. It seems like confused people get off the tracks of this Epstein, this pesky Epstein thing, except for a representative from Kentucky called Thomas Massie, who is trying his absolute best to rally everybody together and get all the votes necessary to release the files. I'm starting to think they might kill that guy.

The last Epstein video posted on my channel was on August 5th, over a month and a half ago. And the fact that there's enough to talk about for another hour-long video should tell you everything that you need to know in regard to the situation. The list has still not come out, guys. And on top of that, this whole situation is being handled currently by people who campaigned on the truth of these messages. Politics is all about lying and slight of hand and manipulating people to control and gain power is what I'm learning. That's why I'm wearing sumpt um right now. Okay, guys.

What began as bold promises of transparency regarding the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein financier. These acts transformed into defensive dismissals. It's just very strange for a lot of people that uh the list of clients that went to the island has not been made public. Yeah, it's it's very interesting, isn't it? So, if you're able to you'll be Yeah, certainly take a look at it. Calls for complete investigations have morphed into ignoring survivors and even calling it a hoax, a Democrat hoax.

From what I understand, thousands of pages of documents have been given. But it's really a Democrat hoax because they're trying to get people to talk about something that's totally irrelevant to the success that we've had as a nation since I've been president. How could you ever say that's a Democrat hoax? Don't you think they would have done it when the Democrats had all the power? Like, what are you talking about? That doesn't make any sense. Nothing has made sense since this happened.

By the way, help what we do on this channel. Go to gump.club to watch behind-the-scenes footage. I have an entire documentary, mockumentary rather, show coming out very soon that's going to be really fun on my second channel. I've got all kinds of channels. Go in the description down below. also a candy company. Also, uh I'm making a video game, releasing another video game in like a couple weeks. There's a reason I'm only posting once a week now. It's because I'm having fun doing what I love and trying to actually make content that I can be genuinely proud of. So, I hope you guys enjoy. And if you don't, I understand. But if you do, press like, hit the subscribe button, and let's continue fracturing America.

Speaking of fracturing, all of this Epstein stuff has resulted in a fracturing of Trump's own political coalition, the coalition of the MAGA. Okay, guys. All the while, this apparent democratic hoax exposing a pattern of entire institutional failure that spans multiple administrations. The Trump administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files has resulted in a 67% public disapproval. Uh, which is so up. All this in spite of releasing 33,000 pages of documents to Congress, which 97% of which consisted of already public information, only 3% of the information is new, while approximately 67,000 pages of the estimated 100,000 total remain withheld. Why?

And get this, controversy reached its peak when House Speaker Mike Johnson, funny little guy, claimed that Trump was an FBI informant in the Epstein case. When he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Mara Lago. He was an FBI informant to try to take the this this stuff down. A bombshell. That's so crazy to say that he retracted within 72 hours. Dude, it's unbelievable. The inconsistency in story changing around every single facet of this story is enough to make a mother's head spin and it doesn't stop. It never ceases. The truth continues to be more and more obfuscated. if not blatantly denied, buried, and suppressed.

This is a bipartisan thing. Like nobody wants pedophiles to for one exist uh and for two, we give our money to a system that is uh apparently housing quite a few. You know, our tax dollars that if we don't pay, we go to jail. You know that, you know, that stuff, those dollars. I think it's very important to approach this entire topic as rationally as possible and as unbiased as possible because it is far more important than just politics. People that make up politics are just people and they have past, they have histories and they have beliefs and thoughts and obviously what they run on is almost never what you actually get if they become elected. And you know, people thought for years that Trump and Epstein were friends. It's been said many times. It's on video. It's photographed. It's common knowledge at this point, but the idea for some reason, I guess, has just been, well, he never actually went to the that was Bill Clinton. That's why none of the stuff ever came out under under Biden is because Hillary wouldn't let it out. And then there's all this campaigning on it. And then now that Trump's in the administration, hey, bud, let's see. Let's see it. I want to see I want to see all these freaks. I want to see them all get their uh get their day, you know, and I want to see the victims get their day in court. Most importantly, it is very important to know and be as rational as possible. the leader of the free world is friends was friends with a legitimate serial pedophile human trafficker like genuine friends and the leader of the free world does not want that information regarding that to come out. Of course not. That's bad. We need to see it though. If you believe that America has a future even a little bit then this is what absolutely has to happen.

Anyways, Trump, Epstein, they're absolutely friends, but they had a falling out at some point. That is what the primary narrative has been. It's the nature of it. Not exactly sure how it happened, if it actually happened. It's a story that's changed year after year, day after day now at this point, thanks to Mike Johnson, that [ __ ]. If we go back to the end of July, we have Trump answering questions in regard to Epstein and him contradicting himself in less than 30 seconds, as well as seemingly contradicting statements that he's made over the years. A reporter asked Trump if some of the workers that were stolen by Jeffrey Epstein from his Mara Lago spa were young women. Just curious, were some of the workers that were taken from you were some of them young women? Were some of them were some of them young women? Trump's first response is that he doesn't want to say. He rambles for a little bit saying, "Everyone knows that people were taken and the star is pretty author." Well, I don't want to say, but uh everyone knows the people that were taken and uh it was the concept of taking people that work for me is bad. But uh that story has been pretty well out there, which you can't just say everyone knows what the truth is and then that just becomes the truth. But then he says yes. So so much for not wanting to answer the question. He just cannot help himself. And the answer is yes, they were. Yes, they were. What did they do in the spa? Jobs in the spa. Yeah, people that work in the spa. They have a great spa. One of the best spas in the world at Mara Lago. The president appears to be simply stating that these young women who worked for him were essentially poached from his business. One of the best businesses in the world to work for Jeffrey Epste, one of the best human traffickers in the world, which the president warned Epste not to do. And when I heard about it, I told him, I said, "Listen, we don't want you taking our people, whether it was spa or not spa. I don't want him taking people and he was fine. And then not too long after that he did it again and I said out of here. But when it happened again that's when he ousted Epstein from Mara Lago. So Epstein was taking Trump's girls and then I mean that's what it seems like and that is a story that he was running with for a while and continued to give the answer. Stole people that work for me. I said don't ever do that again. He did it again and I threw them out of the place.

But beyond that, the clip has even more serious implications. In the next few seconds, a follow-up question from a reporter asked if one of the women that was stolen from the spa was Virginia Ju, which if you didn't know, Virginia was one of the most outspoken victims of Jeffrey Epstein. And she claimed to have been traffic to Jeffrey Epste's friends like Prince Andrew and more. Trump says, "I think she worked at the spa." I think so. Did one of those stolen um you know persons that include Virginia Jeffrey? Uh I don't know. I think she worked at the spa. I think so. I think that was one of the people. Yeah. He he's told her. So we have that and that's not exactly breaking news as Virginia had been claiming she'd been a teenage spa tenant at Mara Lago before she was approached by Justain Maxwell who hired her to be a masseuse for Epstein in 2000. So, it seems really odd to just talk about this type of thing like that, but you know, billionaires do what billionaires do, and it isn't exactly Trump's fault if an employee takes another job. But, it's a different reason than has been credited for Trump and Epstein falling out than we've seen in the past. That's the key here.

Another stop on our trip down the rabbit hole of changing stories goes to 2020 when a book called the Grifters Club claimed that they'd access the Mara Lago resort registry where they saw that Epstein had been a member until October 2007. So, this was until it's alleged that Epstein was kicked out after hitting on the teenage daughter of another club member. So, this has seemingly been confirmed recently when White House communications director Steven Chung made a recent emailed statement that said, "The fact is that the president kicked him out of his club for being a creep." So, that adds up. Okay. Also, very important to note that these are things being said about Trump rather than being said by Trump himself. But still, when the White House communications director assigned by Trump is one of the people making these statements, I would consider that to be credible because that is a an instrument of the administration. That is the, you know, the mouthpiece, if you will. So, we have another example of a story that contradicts what is being said now. Did he throw him out over stealing club employees or did he kick him out because he's a [ __ ] creep? You have to pick one of those things. You can't just, you know, mix business with pleasure.

But even the old statement contradicts other claims that had been made up until that point. The New York Times on July 9th, 2019 cited a Trump Organization official for stating that Jeffrey Epstein was never a duespaying member. He only came as a guest of a guest. So if that's the case, then how come he's in the club registry? And that shows an account for Epstein that was closed in October 2007. Also, if 2007 is the year that they had their falling out and their friendship of the ages came to an end, then that in and of itself is contradictory to statements Trump made multiple times in July 2019 when he claimed that he hadn't talked to Epstein 15 years or more, which would have been 2004. And I did have a falling out a long time ago. Uh the reason doesn't make any difference, frankly, but I haven't spoken to him in probably 15 years or more. So, our timeline is looking a bit wonky. I'm going to be real, guys. Timeline looking So, 2004 is another year in which they had their potential infamous falling out and when they stopped being friends. Because, of course, there is another contradicting story. In 2004, the two had become bitter rivals after a bidding war for a mansion that had been auctioned off by a bankruptcy court. Trump ended up winning the mansion for $41 million, but it drove a wedge between the two. that is Donald Trump and convicted sexual predator, pedophile and human trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Or at least that's how it seems to be painted. Not all the pedophile human trafficking stuff. That's legit. I'm talking about uh their bitter rivalry and how the auction resulted in their, you know, breakup. But who really knows after how many times the story has changed?

But wait, when Speaker Mike Johnson recently claimed that Trump was an FBI informant, he also changed the story again. He said that when Trump heard the rumors about Epstein, that's when he kicked him out of the Mara Lago club. It's a terrible, unspeakable evil. He believes that himself. When he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Mara Lago. So, there are multiple stories behind their friendship ending. Did they fall out after Epstein stole a Trump employee? Did they fall out after Epste hit on miners at Trump's club? Did they fall out after a bidding war that pitted them against each other? Or did their friendship end when Epstein's crimes began to become public knowledge? There are multiple stories about Epstein's Mara Lago membership. He wasn't a member. He just came as a guest. Or he was a member, which the registry allegedly showed that he had an account that was closed in 2007 as a result of him flirting with a member's underage daughter. Or also, he was a member, but he was kicked out after rumors of Epstein's crimes became public around 2005 or 2006 when the media started covering the story. the big Epstein is a gigantic pedophile story. So that's on top of all the other story changing that's been happening over the course of this story unfolding this year.

They were going to release everything. They were going to release it in phases with phase one being released to media pages. The client list was on Pam Bondie's desk. That [ __ ]. Then the client list didn't exist. Then they were going to fully investigate everything and everyone involved. Then the DOJ FBI puts out a memo that essentially says the case is closed and we're not investigating anything or anyone else and we're not releasing any more documents. Anyone who wants the truth is stupid and misled. You are all sheep for believing a Democrat hoax. That's where we're at right now, guys. And I've got to say the government has done a lot of stuff to make me not trust it. I mean, here's a short list. This one, though, is really making me feel like a dumb fool. Has there ever been a trustworthy statement ever. Has there ever been? These aren't I mean, what is even I can't even think about it. I can't even think about it. It makes me angry. It makes me a little upset. Makes me want to break my holy relic.

Needless to say, you've heard a lot of this information. This is mostly stuff you already know, but there are things that we're going to be covering in this video that you probably don't know. you probably haven't heard of because they're things that I hadn't heard of until doing research uh for another video because there is so much to this and it is so deep. It is a sick sick rabbit hole. The rest of this video we're going to keep focused on things that we haven't yet covered in extensive detail yet. Like for example, how the government terribly misrepresented the raw footage we were given of the night that Epstein died. There's actually a great video on Coffeezilla's channel put together covering the top five lies in the Epstein footage with a complete rendering of the cell block he was held in that shows just how misrepresented and misled the public was about what we would be seeing in this. We'd see footage of the cell. We did not. Let's fly over to where Epstein cell actually is. I've marked it with a green door down the hall. We actually see a camera marked in red that wasn't recording the night of Epstein's death. There was only one camera. There was not. There were 11 cameras, but only two of them were recording. There were at least two cameras recording and nine other cameras that were working, but not recording due to a malfunction only days earlier. Footage showed that no one was there except Epstein. Someone is what are we seen going up the stairs towards Epstein cell after lockdown. There are several people who appear in the footage the FBI released and actually one even appears after lockdown walking up the stairs. And we were going to get the raw footage, man. The raw footage. The raw highly edited footage to misrepresent an entire situation. What are you dumb? We also got the lie that we could see anyone walking to Epstein's cell, but the camera only captures the very edge of the staircase. So, anyone hugging the right side of the staircase wouldn't be visible. For example, if you just did this, if you just did this right here, watch. You're going to see every This is Epstein's cell. Okay, guys. This is Epstein's cell. Imagine that. Okay, now this is me and I'm the guy who's going to kill Epstein on behalf of all of the uh the uh elected officials apparently in our government. Coffee even made the 3D rendering they created of the SHU Epstein was held in available on his Patreon. You can check out his video and see the rendering for yourself by subscribing to his Patreon.

The biggest revelations we should talk about have come in the wake of a scrapbook album from Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003, which was released and contained photos, letters, and poems from his closest friends over the years. Some are handwritten, some are typed, many are signed, and many reference his proclivities for being a freak. They're sex-related. Epstein's 50th birthday book. The birthday scrapbook is something we've been hearing about for over a month. And back in mid July, the Wall Street Journal put out an article titled, "Jeffrey Epstein's friends sent him body letters for a 50th birthday album. One was from Donald Trump." Very, very, very provocative title. Now, of course, you need a subscription to the Wall Street Journal to read that full article, and I'm not going to do that because now everything's public and I don't need to pay a access fee or whatever the to see that [ __ ]. You can listen to 2 minutes worth of the article and hear that it eventually is described as a letter from Trump written in a handdrawn naked woman's body. It reads like some kind of bizarre fanfiction that Trump himself allegedly thought up. It's super weird. I will read this and I don't really understand what's going on, but this is a transcript. I'm not sure what's it's a transcript that's written and then drawn. Donald Trump drew Trump allegedly. I don't know. There must be more to life than having everything. Donald Trump. Yes, there is. But I won't tell you what it is. Jeffrey. Nor will I since I also know what it is. Donald, we have certain things in common. Jeffrey. Jeffrey. Yes, we do. Come to think of it. Donald, enigmas never age. Have you noticed that? Jeffrey, as a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you. Donald, a pal is a wonderful thing. Happy birthday. and may every day be another wonderful secret. And then the most confusing looking signature of all time, Donald Trump's signature. It's crazy. This article was a big enough deal that Trump filed a defamation lawsuit against Dow Jones, who is the parent company behind the Wall Street Journal and its owner, Rupert Murdoch, seeking $10 billion in damages. That's some Dr. Evil [ __ ] right there. 10 billion. I seek $10 billion because I don't like it when people lie about are you even allowed to sue people as the president? Isn't that like the whole point of being the most powerful dude ever? is that that you just have the first amendment, people are just gonna be like, "I don't like you." And then make cartoons about how dumb you are and [ __ ] and you just so happen to be really good friends for a long time with one of the world's most prolific evil guys and then you just expect people to not talk about that and expose you and stuff like what are you talk what?

Anyways, he posted to social media that it was a powerhouse lawsuit to take down the fake news media for the people. spokesperson for Dow Jones made a statement to the BBC standing by the accuracy of their reporting and would defend it against any lawsuit. A follow-up article was released by the Wall Street Journal on July 24th detailing more of the contents within the birthday book without fully showing their hand. And this one was titled Jeffrey Epstein's birthday book included letters from Bill Clinton and Leon Black. And this article's focus is on how the biggest name in the book at the time it was created was a past president, Bill Clinton, not Donald Trump. Again, you can't read without being a Wall Street Journal member, but you can listen to 1.5 minutes of it and hear it quote Clinton's letter, which is the following. It's reassuring, isn't it, to have lasted us long across all the years learning and knowing adventures and also to have your childlike curiosity, the drive to make a difference in the solace of friends. So much for a democratic hoax, dude. Seems like that is the Democratic cabal there. And that's why they didn't release it. That's why Joe Biden wasn't allowed to res release it is because of Hillary and the Clintons and how they have so much control over [ __ ] and Obama and stuff. I don't know. Is it? I'm not sure. I just want it to come out. I don't care about the sides. I just don't I don't like the idea of uh living in a free a free cunch uh and having this just be like something that's holding over that's being held over our politicians heads, you know? I don't like that. I don't like that. Are you telling me that our our politicians can be blackmailed? Are you telling me that that in spite of 99.9% of the entire United States of America wants something to happen, politicians will not do it because they are blackmailed by a guy, a single guy? Are you telling me a single guy has even after death every politician's nuts in his hands? Both sides, not just the right or the left. It isn't about that. It's about vulnerability and it's about foreign adversaries and it's about blackmail. And apparently that's just how everything works in the world. I I live in a small world apparently because I've never blackmailed anybody or ever been blackmailed. I don't know what any of this stuff is like. It's crazy. Probably cuz I'm just a normal guy. I'm just a normal guy. I'm not a master of the universe. Sure, I have an Arnuki Beast and that is pretty cool. In fact, let's see what this little to say. What do you got to say? He didn't even say [ __ ] Praise up to the Arnuki beast. This is a new holy relic here, guys. This little guy.

You know how grocery shopping always feels like it takes way too long. And half the time I end up with random stuff that doesn't actually make a meal just cuz I'm hungry. And that is the reason why I have been using Hungry Routt for a very long time. I'm very glad that they decided to sponsor my channel. Hungry Root is basically my personal shopper and a nutritionist in one. I tell them my preferences like high protein meals and dairy-free snacks cuz they hurt my belly. And Hungry Root starts filling up my cart with recipes and groceries that actually make sense for a little white boy like me. The more you use it, the smarter it gets. Plus, with Hungry Root, I waste way less food because everything that shows up gets eaten. No more sad, wilted spinach in the back of my fridge. Although, I'm here for you, little spinach man. So, if you, viewer of Iompil, have been wanting to make eating healthy easier, take advantage of the offer that you are afforded from watching my channel. That is 40% off your first box, plus a free item in every box for life. Click the link down below or go to hungryroot.com and use code oompa. It's hungry.com code oompa for 40% off and free gifts for life. Wish I had this code when I first started using it. I I actually use it, by the way.

A spokesperson for billium Clinton supposedly refused to comment on the leaked letter from the birthday scrapbook and referred to a statement that was made about how Bill Clinton had ended his relationship with Epstein more than a decade before Epstein was arrested in 2019. Supposedly, he didn't know about Epstein's crimes. Bill Clinton whenever he's asked about Epstein's crimes. I didn't know. Yeah, sure. Didn't you a woman in the White House? Isn't that like a whole thing? Didn't y'all also kill a guy in the '90s?

Now we have full access to the infamous Epstein birthday book and that became available on September 8th when the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform released the records publicly after issuing a subpoena to the Epstein estate for the book on August 25th. The PDF of the leatherbound birthday book is 238 pages long and within it are pictures of Jeffrey Epstein throughout his life with friends and family and girls and also with many faces and names redacted throughout. For example, some of the important people in there, especially victims. A lot of victims are redacted, which is good. But surprisingly, little of it is hidden, relatively speaking. Pages two to four are a table of contents saying who has included letters written to Epstein specifically for his birthday including the following names which we've talked about in our past content. Leon Black, who stayed friends with him and kept him rich. Piece of [ __ ]. Uh Jean Luke Brunell, the only other person who faced charges aside from Jislane and Jeffrey Epstein before committing suicide in a French prison. Rest in piss, dumb. Bill Clinton, Alan Dersowitz, a lawyer accused of sexual assault by Virginia Juy, Donald Trump, Lesie Wexner, the founder of Victoria's Secret, and man foundational in Epstein's early wealth. And the signs of coercion and manipulation of girls into getting naked and performing sexually are there in this book from very early on, even in letters from longtime friends recollecting their shared past with Epstein. On page 57, a story is told about picking up girls on a beach and taking them out on a boat where with a knife in hand, the girls are told to take their suits off. It is non-ironically almost the implication scene from It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia. It's art uh life mimic some saying it's up. Think about it. She's out in the middle of nowhere with some dude she barely knows. You know, she looks around her. What does she see? Nothing but open ocean. Ah, there's nowhere for me to run. What am I going to do? Say no. Because if the girl said no, then the answer obviously is no. But the thing is is she's not going to say no. She would never say no because of the implication. Horrifying story on page 62 about making a rabbi's daughter do terrible things. It's disgusting. And these stories come from a section of the birthday book that centered around what appears to be four lifelong friends going back to school days. Warren Eisenstein, Terry Johnny Boy Kofka, and Michael Buck Holtz. Pictures of the four begin on page 49 and continue through page 72 with letters and stories breaking them up. There are pictures of public transit passes, driver's licenses to drive, taxi cabs, pictures of public school classes, yearbook photos of the four, recreated pictures from young adulthood to later adulthood, wedding photos. These were bros, close bros. There's no telling how familiar these three friends were with the activities of the fourth, who was Epstein. But it seems there are signs of pressuring girls to get nude or perform sexual acts even way back then. Uh whether these are early examples or not, it is extremely uncomfortable regardless.

Where a lot of the focus around this birthday book lies is in the friend section dedicated to his powerful friends beginning on page 114. But before we jump ahead to that, one picture jumps out to me on page 98, which is a picture of Epstein in a suit next to a woman wearing all black with her face redacted. That has the caption, "He is the boyfriend of redacted. We think he works for the CIA." Now, it's interesting because conspiracy theories have been circulating that Jeffrey Epste was working with the CIA or maybe even a foreign intelligence like Israel's MSAD. And it seems like most of these theories stem from Epstein's girlfriend and partner in crime, Chislain Maxwell, being the daughter of Robert Maxwell, a man highly suspected of working for Israeli intelligence, a Israel super spy. I mean, yeah, seems like there's a lot of evidence there to be honest. But what does that have to do with having control over US politicians? Nothing at all. But these are conspiracy theories that are largely dismissed as yet another Democrat hoax. They are often seen as having no merit by everyone who is friends with Jeffrey Epstein. But it's interesting to see that this birthday book from the early 2000s having images and quotes referencing an association between him and the CIA. I think that's very interesting. Is this evidence that it's true? Nope. Probably not. But who was the censored woman with theories referencing his closeness to Robert Maxwell when Justain Maxwell was girlfriend? Then would Jazlain be the censored girlfriend in the birthday book? I'm not totally sure. I don't think so. Her name and picture are uncensored throughout the book, even right next to redacted faces like on page 104 or when her and Epste are naked in a pool together with bodies redacted on page 107. So why would it be redacted there? Probably because it's not her.

Now, I want to jump to the letters and writings from Epstein's powerful friends, all conveniently collected in this disgusting birthday book. I want to go on record saying my birthday was pretty recently, and nothing at all like this has ever happened to me, and I don't understand how this is normal, or maybe it's just cuz I'm homeschooled or whatever, but there is pure true evil out there. And it seems like some of them we elect um to run our country, which is pretty crazy that that's just something that happens. One of the first handwritten letters in this section is a poem written to Epstein by Leon Black, the man who helped keep Epstein rich after his arrest, conviction, imprisonment, and release. A real [ __ ]. He is the co-founder of Apollo Global Management, an asset management company that oversees $377 billion in assets. And his note to Epstein begins on page 118. It goes as follows. A VPFC is something to be. A VFPC is something to see. A liver, a lover, a Jeff, a Jeffrey. Let's all give a cheer for today. He's 50. Five decades L or half a century. By burden by bucks, C's and Ms are his key. Blonde, red, or brunette spread out geographically. With this net of fish, Jeff's now the old man and the sea. The letter ends with Leon calling Epstein a dear friend and signing it with love and kisses, Leon. And he says that VPFC means vanity fair poster child. But I'm more curious what the C's and M's mean. A line about birds and bucks precede that. And birds could be describing girls as an offensive slang term. You know, like what people used to say all the time. Bird, I guess. I don't know if it's offensive slang. I don't know, dude. Seems weird, though. Given the fact that Leon, knowing that Epstein is a freak and a criminal, continued his friendship with Epstein after the conviction, I will say that it allegedly means maybe. I've heard this. I've seen this. I don't think it's true at all. It could mean children and minors. Or it could mean cash and millions. I don't know. Neither one of those things are probably true, but who knows? One thing that is totally true is that it's a poem that reads ominously with hindsight and retrospect, knowing what Epstein is guilty of. Though of course it's all speculation as to how familiar Leon may have been with Epstein's crimes. He didn't seem to be disturbed enough to cut ties like many others. So who the knows? Leon seems like kind of a weird guy. So what did Leon say about all this coming out? Reportedly a spokesperson for Leon Black has declined to comment on the letter within the birthday book cuz it's weird and looks bad.

Immediately following that poem is a letter from another friend whose name is censored in both the poem and table of contents for the birthday book. It's a letter to degenerate one from degenerate 2 with a redacted name. Still in the poem, the line, "So many girls, so little time," appears while describing Jeffrey as always grinning like the mysterious, mischievous lad you are. It's under the friend section of the book. So, if names like Bill Clinton and Donald Trump are unredacted, who could this person be for it to be one of the few censored lines in the book in this part when most of what is censored are names and pictures of victims? So, degenerate one and degenerate 2, who is this freak that's still out there and has enough power to have this redacted, not even being a victim? Maybe it's a I don't know, another FBI informant. Whoever it is, it definitely seems like they know what Jeffrey Epstein was guilty of. And if not worse, given the terminology to describe themselves and Epstein and the phrasing within the letter, they are as bad once again, if not worse, as the degenerate.

People that have seen our previous videos may remember that aside from Jeffrey Epste and Jizlane Maxwell, only one other person ever faced charges for crimes related to the trafficking and assault of minors. That was Jean Luke Brunell. He was a modeling agent who trafficked girls to Epstein and was accused of sexual assault himself for many of the victims, some under the age of 15. And Brunell wrote a letter to Epstein, which can be read in the birthday book on page 125. Maybe you could call it a letter, but mostly what it is is a fixation on the number 15. Math equations that result in the number 15. It's very creepy. And as you guys know, I am no mathematician nor math magician. So, it seems like the scrawlings of a crazy person on the inside of their padded cell, but at the bottom, there's what appears to be a tool to help solve some equations with the symbol G being G's age. It seems like a tongue-in-cheek way of gamifying their crimes for Epstein's birthday is what I'm picking up out of it.

So, now, whose letter could follow up the one from Jeanluke Brunell? Disgraced freak. Why, Bill Clinton, of course. Yay. Clinton's handwritten letter. By the way, president of the United States loved president. Everybody loved Bill Clinton. My mom voted for Bill Clinton in the '90s. Okay. My mom really liked Bill Clinton. Pre allegations obviously and murder of Vince Foster uh and all the other stuff that they did and stuff. Uh my parents are both extremely blackpilled in the government. extremely. They accuse me of being an intelligence asset. That's how off the rails they are. Anyways, Bill Clinton, previous president of the United States of America, elected democratically, by the way, his handwritten letter to Jeffrey Epstein on page 126 isn't so extreme. But when it was quoted by the Wall Street Journal before the book's full release, it was quoted accurately and in its entirety, aside from illeible words. It is fairly tame, but a few lines stick out if you're looking for something to point at to say that Bill Clinton had known, which of course he denies that he knew anything because what else would he would he be honest? I don't think they're they're known for that. But this stands out to me because across all my years of writing letters for people's birthdays, which I've never really done to be honest. Uh maybe once or twice, I've mentioned learning and growing as people grow together and they learn to be better people. But the word knowing stands out very specifically. Knowing what? Knowing what? Bill references the two's adventures. What kind of adventures? What kind of knowing are you talking about? Is this some moolok [ __ ] Is this some dedric [ __ ] Are you talking about dri [ __ ] right now? Like what is this? Where what plane are we on? Oblivion. Um, I don't think so. We know that Bill and Epstein went on a trip to Africa together on Epstein's plane with Kevin Spacy. And Kevin has alleged the plane had many young girls and he's obviously massively disgraced as well. Again, Bill Clinton has denied any knowledge of Epstein's crimes and when confronted with the letter, inquirers were directed to his previous statements of denial rather than any new statements being made. So, he's not really that interested in talking about it.

But what is interesting though is that Bill Clinton and this trip to Africa are referenced in the very next letter in the book. This one being from Alan Dersowitz, a lawyer who would go on to represent Epstein and help organize his sweetheart deal. Deal of the century. It's as follows. Dear Jeffrey, as a birthday gift to you, I managed to obtain an early version of the Vanity Unfair article. I talked them into changing the focus from you to Bill Clinton, as you will see from the enclosed excerpt. Happy birthday and best regards. The letter includes an edited image of a vanity unfair cover alleging Epstein was Jack the Ripper and had financed al-Qaeda. So that's a funny joke, I guess. It continues, "Who was that man with Epstein? Jeffrey Epstein is of course one of the most famous men, a household name throughout the planet. His picture has appeared on the cover of every magazine in the world. But what was he doing flying to Africa with an obscure former politician from Hope, Arkansas, referring to Bill Clinton, obviously former president of the United States of America? Who is that politician? And why would Epste have picked him for the coveted seat of his private jet? The moment this obscure man stepped onto the Epstein jet, he became fair game for probing inquiry. Now, it may have been a joke and Bill's name may not have been used, but it's true today. Ever since Bill stepped on that plane, he became fair game for probing inquiry. These people are aware 110%. Due process, legal [ __ ] all that. I've heard Alan Dersowitz, Duchitz, or whatever the his name is, talk about this. You have to be able to sweetheart deal. It's a justice system. There's a justice system. Yeah, there is a justice system and I love it so much and it works really well for everybody. It works really well for politicians and it works really well for those below the poverty line. All right, guys. It works super well.

Now, obviously, I want to get to Trump in this birthday book because it's the the big meat and potatoes of this entire situation, but there are some other letters that raise eyebrows. You could pick and choose which ones you wish to talk about. There's plenty. But Henry Derek wrote a letter found on page 134 talking about how Epstein prefers working in private or better yet, utter secrecy and how much goes on behind the scenes and how they share many of the same burdens. Henry was accused by a girl Epstein allegedly trafficked to Jereki to be a sex slave. Nick Lee, a film producer, wrote a letter found on page 135 calling Epstein a very dear boy and tells a story about an outing with a group including Epstein where one man called Toto pulled redacted skirt up to her panty and put his hand on her before another member of the group, the old man, joined in. So, that's crazy. I feel like what I just said probably has to be redacted from this YouTube video or it'll get taken down. But there's also a George Mitchell, maybe the former Senator George Mitchell, I'm not totally sure. Sorry if not, wrote a letter found on page 146 crediting Epstein for the opportunity to lead a full, exciting, and fantastically varied life and hopes Epstein will intensify your activities in many ways, especially in the field of science. Science people really loved Epstein. Nathan Mirvold, very cool name, weirdo, a former executive at Microsoft and co-founder of Intellectual Ventures, wrote a letter found on page 147 saying how Epstein didn't manage his money, but advised his lifestyle and included several pictures of animal penises and animals mating from a trip to Africa. So, that's weird as a letter from Joseph Pagano as well, who I can't find out who this is. He wrote a letter found on page 158 discussing Epstein's life, avoiding the public eye, wishing him health, stealth, and continued wealth. Not necessarily in that order. You usually only need stealth when you're trying to commit crimes. Uh I'm coming at that from a game development perspective. The only time ever you need stealth is when you're doing something that shouldn't be seen. So this guy, whoever the that is, he's a freak. A poem on page 164, presumably by Stuart Pyar, a chemist and art collector, based on the poem's placement compared to table of contents. We're just kind of assuming here. It has a line that describes how Epstein's behavior would upset the public and and that he has somehow avoided jail. So dark. To add to life's poquency, Jeffrey with increasing frequency on any occasion with little persuasion will outrage the public decency. Jeffrey at half a century with credential penipotentiary though up to no good whenever he could has avoided the penitentiary. That is unbelievable, dude. That is unbelievable. Then we have Henry Ravski attached titrints to his letter on page 166 to Epstein aside a letter that reads for the man who has almost everything but never enough of these. Then Leslie Wexner, the founder of Victoria's Secret, who helped Epste wealth early on, wrote a letter on page 171 in which he gets Epstein what he wanted by drawing a pair of tits at the bottom of his letter.

And here is where we start seeing Trump's name mentioned in the book. On page 154, a cover letter depicting women, a plane, balloons, and cake precedes a drawing, a picture, and a letter that all look terrible. It's from Joel and falls right where the table of contents credits Joel Pascow. The next page is a drawing comparing the years 1983 with 2003, with 1983 showing Epstein giving a lollipop to a group of young girls holding balloons. Then in 2003, he's on his island with his private jet above getting massage and pleasured by a group of naked women and the text, "What a great country." Next is the picture. It's a grainy picture of a noveltysized check written to Epstein from Trump in the value of $22,500 being held by a group of pedophiles. I don't know people. The handwritten letter claims to have arranged a deal between Trump and Epstein where a fully depreciated woman was sold to Trump for $22,500 and the writer laments not getting any of the money or the girl. So, this is, I guess, a bombshell, right? It is a letter that basically admits to trafficking a woman between Epste and Trump, right? And that paired with the drawing, it seems very damning. I mean, people and there's nobody talking about this. I mean, people a lot of people are talking about it, but it's just who cares, man. Who cares? I I care a lot, actually. Like, a a lot. I I It's It's insane. There are four people in the picture with a woman's face being redacted and partially covering the face of another man who I can't quite make out, but you can clearly see Epstein and Joel Pascal, who has been photographed with Epstein before. Oversight dims, a verified government page, has even stated that Joel is a longtime member of Mara Lago in a tweet of this picture and letter. So, I'm inclined to believe that the letter from Trump himself allegedly is buried pretty deep in the book at page 165. Then, you see the heavylined drawing of the woman-shaped body with small curves where breasts would be indicating they're small in size. We covered earlier what the letter says and how it sounds like a weird flirtatious roleplay mentioning shared secrets and commonalities between the two men, Jeffrey Epste and Donald Trump, FBI informant. We can see that it's signed by Donald Trump allegedly. And I say allegedly due to the responses and controversies that have arisen since this all became uh public in the $10 billion lawsuit, which by the way, if I got sued for $10 billion, it is so over for me, dude. If you have that much money, you can just be like, "I don't like it when you say that about me." It's It's true. It's true. But like, just don't. I have a lot of money. I can I can ruin your life with a lot of Have a lot of money. Hey, man. That doesn't seem fair. To be honest, it has become so

This is controversial, and it's why Trump is suing the Wall Street Journal for $10 billion over its publication, even though it's now been released by the Oversight Committee and was provided by the Epstein estate. So, I am curious how this will impact the lawsuit since it's now publicly accessible thanks to the government. And it just seems legit, seems real, seems like a [ __ ] uh lawsuit. Hope I assume it's going to get dropped.

Trump, his administration, and conservative influencers on social media have been very outspoken in denying any possibility that this letter, as well as the novelty size check and the transaction described in the letter from Joel Pashcow, are real. They're obviously denying that because it looks really bad. Obviously, they would deny it. They don't ever acknowledge anything. Um, that's wrong. We have yet to see any. Yeah, I'm really. That's That is true. Yeah, that's bad. It's There's never been any acknowledgement. So, I feel like, yeah. I mean, I don't I don't know what to I don't know what to believe, to be honest. Unfortunately, I really don't know what to believe. I want to believe what's right. I don't want to believe things based on political biases, but this looks bad. This looks really, really, really bad. It's causing quite a stir.

This year, the Trump administration has changed quite a few gears. There were tons of promises of disclosure and transparency, but that has all shifted and instead now they take the stance that this is just a hoax, which is really frustrating because I think everybody was like, "Oh, that's good. They're going to release the Epstein files. That's awesome. I would love to see all the, you know, all the people we can, you know, kind of know, you know, that chapter, that book's going to be shut." The whole campaign, Cash Patel, Dan Bonino, all these people, everything was built on, "I'm going to go on a podcast. I'm going to say, 'All right, you're going to release the files.'" And then as soon as you get in, every the government, the cabal, the demons, the demons go around, they they circle you and they say, "You can't release that." And then they say, "There's no files." Hey, hey, hey, go yourself. Like, what do you want us to do? You want us to trust you? I just hope more people are. I don't know. I just. It seems like nobody cares on the on the on the deep deep dark right. Oh my god, dude. It's a distraction. Uh, everything is a [ __ ] distraction, too. Everything's a distraction. Everything. Everything is a distraction. I'm a distraction. Sorry.

When the FBI and DOJ released their memo, people were understandably upset that despite acknowledging over 1,000 victims exist and 10,000 plus pieces of CSAM were found, no one else was going to be looked into and the case, for all intents and purposes, was closed. Nonsense. He'd post on Truth Social clearly upset that people still care about Epstein and people won't shut up about it. All of a sudden, the files are written by Obama, Hillary Clinton, James Comey, and Joe Biden, and his voters were falling for it. His idiot voters. You stupid. You don't know anything. Even though I've been saying this for years, you're all wrong. This is one of the first instances we've seen of Trump turning on his MAGA peoples. Okay, guys. It's crazy to see. And a lot of them don't even really care, which is really confusing to me. But we have to think about the reason he's turning on them. It's because they want pedophiles punished. They actually care. Most people actually care about this type of stuff.

And when the news of the letter and the drawing Trump allegedly made for Epstein's 50th birthday came out, the president posted to Truth Social the day the Wall Street Journal dropped the article stating that it's a fake letter. It's fake. So why is it fake? Trump says these aren't his words and that's not the way that he talk everything to computer. Trump also says he warned Rupert Murdoch not to print the story because it's a scam, implying that he had some kind of advanced notice that this was going to drop and tried to prevent it, which is interesting because there's a conflicting narrative here.

Vice President uh JD Vance had quite the gotcha for the Wall Street Journal too when the article first went live, calling it complete and utter [ __ ] on Twitter, asking where is this letter while also sharing that they were never shown the letter before it was posted. Caroline Levit, the press secretary, posted to Twitter when the Oversight Committee released the complete birthday book on September 8th, saying that when the Wall Street Journal dropped their article, the reporter Joe Palazolo reached out for comment the exact minute it went live. And Caroline says that they didn't have time to respond. Which is it? I mean, what? If Trump had time to issue a warning to Rupert Murdoch, then he'd probably have time to tell his media team to prepare a response in case it drops, right? I mean, that makes sense. If they didn't have time to respond because they didn't know it was being posted until it went live, then how the did the thing I just say, how would that make any sense?

And then there's poor JD Vance running around. The house is on fire. He's screaming, "Mommy and daddy are fighting. Mommy and daddy are fighting. Please, please." Is the divorce my fault? Yes, it is. You're complacent. You're a part of this. You're supposed to be at least close to one of us. What the [ __ ] I guess JD Vance got the answer to where is the letter? Cuz it's it's right there in in uh in Jeffrey Epstein's birthday book amongst a bunch bunch of other pedos and freaks and criminals. So that's where the letter is. Where's the winner at? Hey bud, right here, dickweed.

Is it possible that Trump and his team are lying? Surely not. I mean, hey, he says he doesn't draw, so there shouldn't be any pictures he's ever drawn to prove that, right? He doesn't draw. Trump doesn't even draw. He doesn't know how to draw. He can draw. We actually have his Art Station account. Oh crap. A drawing of the Manhattan skyline signed by Trump and sold at auction for nearly $30,000 back in 2017. What? A drawing of the Empire State Building signed by Trump and sold for $100 in a chart at auction in 1995. Then again in 2017 for $16,000. Oh my dude. More drawings. City skylines. What the details? Windows, streets, trees, people, crosshatches, buildings, all signed by Trump. Oh my god. His family on a nice sunny day out enjoying the sun. Just kidding. I drew that. For a mother who don't know how to draw, there's a lot of drawings being sold at charity auctions. I know actual artists who have sold less drawings.

When asked about the letter to Epstein by reporters more recently, he dropped the line about the drawings, but maintains that it's not his signature and not his words. "It's not my signature and it's not the way I speak and anybody that's covered me for a long time know that's not my language." So clearly he's seen that people have seen that he's a draw he's a prolific artist. He's a really excellent he's he really can capture the uh the uh the feelings the feeling of the the skyline. He's actually pretty good. This is interesting. The skyline. The skyline. Are those people? What are what are are those people?

So the signature and the words. We'll dig into that. Now, one thing that's noticeable when comparing the letter to Epstein to other drawings that Trump has done is that in the other drawings, Trump has signed his full name, not just Donald. And the letter found in the 50th birthday book Jizlane Maxwell put together for Epstein, it's just Donald. Now, that doesn't mean much because Trump has signed probably close to a million documents in his life, I'd assume, including 200 executive orders just this year and also something that he previously condemned Obama for. But who is really keeping track? This just politics, right, guys? The claim is that this is not his signature. Not that it's a legitimate signature that's been lifted and pasted into the letter. It's that it's not his. It isn't his at all. This isn't his signature.

During a press conference, the media pressed press secretary Caroline Levit about the signature's authenticity, asking if she'd support having an expert analyze it to prove it's not the president's signature. She says that they would support that. Then states that she's seen many forensic analysts of signatures coming out who said it's absolutely not Trump's signature. "Uh sure, we would support that. And in fact, I have already seen many forensic uh analysts of signatures coming out. I believe it was the Daily Signal that published a piece with three separate uh signature analysts who said that this absolutely was not the president's authentic signature."

She even cites a supposed article from the Daily Signal that seemingly showed three separate analysts coming to this conclusion. I wanted to find this article and see for myself. Strangely, however, there is no article like this at all on the Daily Signal, and they have over 16,000 results when you search for Trump signature. But going back through to the date the letter became available, there aren't any that reference signature analysis. So maybe we're just dumb and we can't find it. But digging some more, what I think she may have been trying to reference was an article from the Daily Wire, which claimed that the Wall Street Journal Epstein letter was the polar opposite of Trump's writing style according to three forensic analysis. You know, the Daily Wire very centrist, very unbiased. So, let's assume the Daily Wire had some reputable experts conduct the analysis. We should not discount it just because of the uh the penis sucking nature of the publication. Oh, wait a second. Turns out they had three leading AI research systems conduct the analysis and they unanimously agreed that there was an extremely low probability that it was authored by Trump. Are you kidding me right now? Dude, what? You had AI do it? Oh.

So with this knowledge, let's look back at the statement that Levit had made and we'll compare it to the truth. She claimed that it was the Daily Signal that published the article, a site that's already pretty far right leaning. It was not. It was the Daily Wire, an even further right-leaning outlet. She then said it was an article that published the findings of three forensic analysts who agreed it absolutely was not the president's authentic signature, but in reality, it wasn't three forensic analysts. It was Grock AI or probably not even Grock, dude. It was I don't even know what's the worst AI. I can't even think of them. It was three AI tools. So, this just in, Caroline Levit also a [ __ ] like Pam Bondi. So, they didn't analyze the signature. They analyzed the writing style and they didn't find that it absolutely wasn't his. They found it was a very low probability. Oh my god, there is a big difference between "absolutely wasn't his" (0%) and "very low probability." Like a lot of difference. Like so much, dude. Like if you were to say there is a 0% chance you're going to die today, I'd be like, "Okay, I'll sleep tonight." And then if someone said if I heard a voice in my head, "There is a very low probability you will die today," I'd be on edge, dude. You know why? Because there's a chance. Obviously. What's a low probability? Less than 50. Okay, there you go.

So, in essence, Caroline Levit really heavily invited a handwriting expert to analyze the signature by just spreading a bunch of misinformation and being a total dumbass, doofus, idiot, uh, propagandist freak. This is America. All right. This isn't communist China. We don't do that. Well, we do do that, actually. I I'll I'll correct myself. But but the the people of America are very proud because we feel like we don't do that. But we do though. We do it just as much as everybody else. But like we don't think we do. Oh, I farted.

So yeah, a real expert analyzed the signature, not the contents of the letter, not the writing style, and they reported that the signature absolutely is Donald Trump. "The signature that came up um last night uh purported to be Donald Trump. I can absolutely say it is Donald Trump, but it's very much the signature that Donald Trump had um in the early 2000s as opposed to his signature now." Real specialty title graphologist Emma Bach conducted this analysis, and she's been working as an expert since 1989. According to her website, she'd done work for Google and has had her work appear on TV and in true crime documentaries. Not that appearing on screen magically makes your work bulletproof, but she's earned the trust of many conglomerates, companies. She's a more trustworthy person than, let's say, Caroline Levit. It's not a difficult conclusion to come to, and I feel like anyone with a quarter a low probability of a working brain could probably look at the signature in the birthday book and the signatures that Donald Trump has written on other letters and just be like, "Yeah, that's probably him for sure. It looks like his whack-ass weird signature." So, yeah, that makes sense.

But what about the contents of the letter itself? We couldn't trust AI to analyze the contents. So maybe we could try letting AI analyze the contents again and hope for a different result. That's the solution on Twitter at least. Grock was asked by a Twitter/X user who hasn't lost all critical thinking skills to see if Trump has ever used the word enigma since it's used in the letter. Grock finds there is no record of him using the word enigma in writing or speaking. The reason we use this example is that Donald Trump Jr. quoted this post in a post to prove that this couldn't possibly be his father's work, saying, "My father has a very specific way of speaking. And in 47 years, I've never seen him doodle once." Now, we know we can set aside the claims of the no doodling because we know Trump is a prolific doodler, okay guys? Because that for sure is false. And aside from the fact that it's sad that in 47 years of being alive, he's never sat next to his son and drew with him. That's sad. That alone, but we'll ignore that. We're not going to humanize anybody in this video except for the victims, obviously.

Additionally, the claim that Trump never used the word enigma was debunked with a clip of Trump using it twice at a rally in Iowa. "Now, Carson's an enigma to me. I didn't say it. Carson's an enigma." It was also used twice in a book that Trump co-wrote in 2004 titled Trump: How to Get Rich. So yeah, that's wrong. It's not the only example of him using terms and phrasing that are also present in the letter. In fact, many similarities have been found between the letter and Trump's writing style, which is apparently different from what's found in the letter allegedly. And these are compiled by Jud Lume on popular information and investigation comparing the two. And I'm a big Loom guy, so I'm going to I'm going to give uh Jud a chance here. Jud's an interesting name.

The first line of the letter, the part that is dubbed voice over, says, "There must be more to life than having everything." This is a direct quote from a children's book, Higgity Piglety Pop by Maurice Synindac. Maurice also wrote a book, We Are All in the Dumps with Jack and Guy, with a page that's critical of Trump, depicting homeless kids in front of Trump Tower. Trump seems to obsess over any criticism he faces. So, I'm sure this was an author he was aware of. At the end of the letter, Epstein is referred to as PAL, which is a term Trump has used to refer to Steve Witoff in 2018. So, he absolutely says that he also used it to describe Phil Ruffin in 2011. The letter, if written by Trump, allegedly also refers to himself in the third person, which is another Trump style choice that he's shown in the past and was even made into a compilation 6 years ago by the Washington Post because of how strange it is to refer to yourself in third person. "I'm not a very smart guy." It seems like this is just outright denial to try and save face. And there is no politician or party that represents you, okay? Because they're all full of [ __ ]. It doesn't matter what side of the fence they're on. If they've been in the game for a long enough time, they're full of [ __ ]. They're full of dookie. Uh, you know, they got about as much dirt as a flea market couch. So, yeah.

Signature allegedly legit. The writing style allegedly legit now. Allegedly legit. I've never heard him say Enigma. Pal. Paligma. I don't know, dude. How about this? How about the big ass novelty-sized check? How about that? The $22,500 check written to Epstein for the fully depreciated woman. Caroline was asked about this at another press conference, and her response was, "Did you see the signature on that check? It's not Donald Trump's signature. It is absolutely The president did not say that. did not sign that at all. I asked AI. I asked AI. I wondered if the president has any recollection of that or what do you guys make of that photo uh that was included in those documents? Did you see the signature on that check? It is not Donald Trump's signature. It is absolutely not the president did not sign that check."

Now, just in case she's unaware, that is a novelty-sized check, not a normal piece of paper. Just because Trump's rich doesn't mean all of his checks are that big. I would say because I'm a person who thinks the movement to sign your name is going to be vastly different when signing a gigantic check as to when you sign a small normal check. One is the length and width of a grown man's thigh. So yeah, probably not going to be a typical signature. Also, also also also it's a novelty size check. They're not even real. It's just like a a thing. Why would they put that in the birthday book if not if not as a funny joke? It's obviously clearly a joke amongst good pals, good ini enigmatic pals. I don't think it needs to be a perfect signature to hand over to the bank. It's just a symbolic deal. It's just symbolic of a deal that's made between a couple of people. So anyways, even if it was all just a joke, the fact that it exists and the reasoning behind it is a major red flag regarding the relationship between the current president of the United States of America and Jeffrey Epstein. Um, if they're joking about selling women when one of them is literally guilty of selling and trafficking women, it's up.

They deny that he wrote the letter. Then when it matches his writing and word choice in the past, they deny that he wrote the signature. And then it was found to be a match by handwriting expert. And they deny that the check was has his signature on it when it's 20 times larger than a normal signature. So of course, it's not going to be a one to one. So let's suspend disbelief for a second and say that these are forgeries. It is fake. So in this case, we're assuming that the only person who's been lied and slandered about in the Jeffrey Epstein birthday book is Trump. Out of 238 pages, three are completely fabricated magically. You know, I'm not so sure about that. I'm not so sure about that. And also, if it was fabricated and it was a Democratic hoax, why didn't the Democrats use it to win the election last year? I just don't understand how this works really. What's the end game here? If this was planted to make Trump look bad, when did they plant it? Was it planted 20 years ago just waiting to see the light of day and make Trump look bad? Was it planted right before it was sent to the Wall Street Journal and the Oversight Committee? Like, the only way that any of this is [ __ ] and is fake is if there are people literally faking stuff the moment before all this comes out. And it didn't exist before uh Trump was elected in the in the LA like it but all this nothing's changed though. It's all the same stuff we're seeing. We're just seeing more of it released. So, I don't know. I do know that the answers that have been given are simply unsatisfactory to address the criticisms over the letter correctly and the check being present in the birthday book at all. Any of this being present, none of the things that have been said make me think, well, I trust him. Most of the reasons given for why it couldn't be true have just been completely proven wrong. So what's next? I mean, what the what else is there? Just spam that line, dude. It's a hoax. It's a hoax. It's a hoax, man. It's a hoax. Look, the whole thing is a hoax. Democrat hoax that never ends.

The hoax was explained more by Speaker Mike Johnson in the same speech in which he stated Trump was an FBI informant because continuing to call it a hoax is just drawing more backlash for them. Though, apparently, their argument is being mischaracterized by the media. I feel bad for them. One could argue that mischaracterization is happening on both sides. Like using incorrect information from the wrong website to prove the wrong point. It's pretty exhausting. I'm going to be real. I I need to lay down and roll around for a little bit or something like that. You guys ever lay on the floor? Anyways, in the statement from Mike Johnson, he says that when calling it a hoax, what Trump is referring to is Democrats using the situation to attack him. "Trump called it a hoax yesterday. What Trump is referring to is the hoax that the Democrats are using to try to attack him. He has never said or suggested or implied. I've talked to him about this many times. Many times he's not saying that what Epstein did was a hoax because that's what it seemed like he was saying to me, but I'm glad Mike Johnson cleared that up."

When Trump heard about the unspeakable evil from Jeffrey Epstein, he kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago, according to uh the cronies. Although earlier in this video, we did point out three separate stories that were given officially by official channels for why Epstein was kicked out or why Trump was no longer fraternizing with him, which was then denied and confirmed and denied and confirmed. Anyways, Trump feels great sympathy for these victims, these women. Why else would he have been an FBI informant to try and take them down? Tried to take the whole thing down. He was a hero. He is horrified. Calling the whole thing a hoax. It It's been misrepresented. He's not saying that what Epstein did is a hoax. It's a terrible, unspeakable evil. He believes that himself. When he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago. He was an FBI informant to try to take the this this stuff down. Oh, okay guy. Okay. Oh, Speaker Johnson, I get it now. Trump is actually part of the solution, not part of the problem. Yeah, that was my impression of JD Vance understanding understanding the story, the reality.

When Trump talks about a hoax, according to Mike Johnson, he's talking about Democrats' impure motives. They're using this now to take Trump down when they never did anything in the time that they controlled the White House. What he's talking about is the Democrats who are doing this with impure motives. If they cared so much about this, why didn't they do something during the four years of the Biden administration when the Biden DOJ had all the records? They didn't say a word about it. Aren't they literally saying that the signature is fake, the letter is fake, and the check is fake? That is pointing to physical documents as being fake, not just the way that they're being used. So, that's confusing. It doesn't make sense.

We do have to follow up on some of these points, though. First of all, there is a supposed compassion and sympathy that Trump feels for the victims. Johnson said that he would likely even meet with them. Should he meet with the victims? Should he meet with the victims? I suspect he probably will. Yeah, he has great compassion for them. The president has a very compassionate heart. He hates the fact that these women were suffered those harms. He hates what Epstein is accused of and and who he was. Well, luckily, victims of Epstein were gathering outside of the White House demanding transparency. So, they were right outside. All Trump had to do was invite them in or go out there. Nope. Unfortunately, not. That didn't work.

While Trump was making a spectacle of going to a seafood restaurant in DC, he was asked directly if he would meet with the victims on the 9th. This was 4 days after the Mike Johnson statement said he probably would. And Trump responded saying, "Nobody has suggested that and I haven't even thought about that." So, will you meet with the Epstein victims? Do you plan to meet with I don't know about nobody suggested that. But would you be open to doing that? Certainly, I don't like that whole situation with respect to anybody being abused or hurt, but I haven't uh I haven't even thought about that. I love reading quotes of Trump. It's so funny. He's like he's like what? He runs the whole country, man. It's crazy. This is the second time. Like I kind of get it. The whole business thing and you got to run it like a business and stuff, but this is just. Come on. I don't know.

Anyways, did Johnson make a wrong assumption that Trump would? Was he just saying something he had no insight into to try and make Trump seem seem more like a good sympathetic guy? Was he lying potentially? The same day, Caroline Levit was asked more about the hoax and she reiterated that the hoax is the narrative that's being spun, not the documents themselves. "The hoax is apparently Democrats pretending to care about victims and even calls the ones gathering outside the White House political props. What's fake is not the document. The hoax is the Democrats pretending to care about victims of crime when they do not care about victims of crime. When they have done nothing to solve crimes, when they have done nothing to lock up child pedophiles and child rapists across the country, uh, and when they are now using victims as political props to try and again smear the president of the United States and drag on this bad story about him."

It is a distraction. I'd call these people cold and calculating, but none of their answers match up at all. They're just cold and dumb. Johnson says that Trump is sympathetic and will probably meet with the victims. And Trump says he's never heard that idea and it seems like he won't, to be honest. And then we had the press secretary calling victims political props instead of trying to be more sympathetic to Epstein victims. It's just I don't know. People [ __ ] so much on the right about being called Nazis and racist and all this stuff. Um, and they're like, "It's just you're using words to to devalue. You're just trying to immediately throw my argument out immediately. It's a Democratic hoax. You're a Democrat. You're a Democrat." It's the same thing now. It's all the same [ __ ]. It's there's it's makes me feel at peace in all honesty because I can just walk away. I can make this video, get fired up for an hour, have a bunch of people get fired up with me on the internet. We can all kind of I don't want to say [ __ ] and moan together, but we can share in something that's important and we can walk away. Make sure we know and just remember it. Remember it when we when we vote, remember it when we are considering even running ourselves for a local office. And and there is a way to change all this stuff and it takes a long time and you can't get distracted. You can't get distracted from this stuff. You can distract yourself on purpose, but you have to remember things like this. You cannot forget things like this. You can't be won over by promises. And that it's it's going to be really difficult. But uh I think it's got to start at a local level though, to be honest with you guys. I think it's got to start at a local level. But anyways, what the [ __ ] am I talking about? I have no idea.

They can't make up their minds about what stance to take. They're running around with their heads cut off. Something is said like an absolute fact. For example, Trump doesn't doodle. Then he's a [ __ ] doodler of the highest degree and his doodles are awesome and they've been sold at auctions. Everything gets walked back. Even the claim that he was an FBI informant was walked back by Mike Johnson when it spurred backlash online after people said you need to have seen or participated in a crime in order to be able to inform on it. That's the joke. That's the funny part about all the stuff. It's like he's an FBI informant. Oh, you mean like he's undercover? He's an undercover pedophile. Is that what you mean? Speaker of the House Mike Johnson? You mean he's an undercover pedophile? Human trafficker. Thank you, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson.

In walking back his claim that Trump was an FBI informant, he says that what he meant was that Trump was one of the only people willing to help law enforcement and he was one of the only people, one of the only prominent people as everyone has reported, not President Trump, but everybody about him, uh, that he was willing to help law enforcement uh, go after this guy who was a disgusting uh, child abuser. So, he may have used the wrong terminology, but that's what he meant by his words. All right, guys. There's an ocean of difference between being willing to help law enforcement and being an FBI informant. It's also so easy to say now 20 years after the fact that you were willing to help back then. It's a lie. It's just not true. But it is such a massive and impactful statement to make and then walk back when you're the speaker of the house, third in line for presidency in the event of a tragedy like that. That's crazy.

Congressman Jared Moskovitz even brought it up in a move to pressure House Judiciary Committee Republicans to see if the FBI should be questioned to see if it's true because he's just lying. He's an FBI informant. Whatever the his name is, Mike Johnson. Big Mike. Aren't they not allowed to lie? Isn't that like the whole thing? I swear to uphold the Constitution. What are you talking about? You lie. You tarnish our rights, our amendments. You sickant. You're a freak. You're a freak. You're not like us. You're an ugly actor. You're on pills and not the fun ones either, like vitamins or whatever.

This story has never been more convoluted and obfuscated than it is right now. And it is incredibly damaging to public confidence, uh, the confidence we have in our leaders, the confidence victims have in general. How can we trust them to have our best interests at heart if we can't even be sure they're fully committed to transparency around the most notorious sex trafficker that has ever existed in American history? Anyways, thanks for watching guys. If you enjoyed, press the like button, hit the subscribe button. We'll see you in the next one. Go to all my other channels. Go to the Gump Club to watch behind the scenes videos and content and uncensored videos and [ __ ]. I'll see you guys in the next one.