Transcription
Good evening. Welcome back, everybody. As you know, Dan Winter here for fractalgut.com, and I'm here with Mark Roarbau, our a real physicist.
Well, thanks, Dan. I like to be called that. I'm an engineer, and my hobby is physics, but that's what I like doing. I always wanted to be more of a scientist than an engineer. And our, um, our fractalgut.com and which is the fractal grand unified theory, which Mark has been calling totu, the theory of the universe, uh, has gained lots of traction recently. We have thousands of people interested and viewers and links and connections, and Mark has uh created a whole numerous new papers on the physics here. So this idea that charge collapse causes gravity and that fractality causes charge collapse is taking root here. And we're going to do some review of the core, the most exciting recent articles at fractalgut.com, uh, with Mark Roarbar. Remember, Mark's the link to Mark Roarbau's direct blog, which is linked to all these articles, most of them, is phmarker.blogspot. Is that right?
That's right. Yeah.com. Yeah.
Where's the PHX come from in there, anyway?
The Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport. I, I lived in Phoenix for so long, and I see PHX is short for Phoenix. So it's the Phoenix.
And the return, the Phoenix.
That's where the bird rises from the ashes. It's good. So.
Coincidentally, it turned out to be a good name because of that phoenix [laughter] bird.
That's right. The bird. And we Scorpios agree about that, anyway. [laughter]
Yeah. So, so we agreed today we're going to do four major, well, we're going to start with four major themes and then review several of Mark's recent articles. The first one we're going to talk about is Sabine Hawenfelder's uh excited agreement that charge collapse is the mechanism of gravity, and why doesn't she agree that we have discovered the cause of charge collapse? So, we're going to have a fun chat about that one. And the second conversation we're going to have now is my recent article, fractalgut.com/nonlocal, in which I go through the causes and mechanisms of non-locality and action at a distance. In other words, entanglement is actually phase conjugate charge collapse implosion. That's what entanglement and action at a distance starts. And the third conversation this evening is going to be about if charge collapse is in fact the cause of the spin of the proton. Mark's new article is in fact, charge collapse the cause of all of spin. Hello. Have you been wondering what's the cause of spin? We think we know.
That's the exciting part. That's why we got together again.
[laughter]
And the, and the fourth conversation of the first series of this evening is going to be about Mark's recent article about the analysis of the NASA image that if you analyze the gravitational lensing very apparent in the NASA image, do you in fact see that since charge collapse golden ratio is setting the geometry of the alignment of the major uh galactic bodies, is fractalgut.com/cosmology.html where Mark has modeled many cosmological variables. And so if you understand the cause of the attractor at center, do you in fact eliminate the need for this dumb idea called dark matter? Because in my very humble understanding, the only excuse that physicists came up with for the words dark matter, the only excuse was, "Oh, there's more gravity around here than we can figure out where it came from. So, we're going to call that dark matter." Actually, dark matter was their word for ignorance of where gravity comes from. And if you know what the course of the attractor is, then you don't need dark matter. Is So, anyway, Mark has a new article about that, and that's where we're going today.
Yeah. And I promoted myself to cosmologist, cosmologist and chief, the CIC, and that years ago, but it's being re-enforced. Remember that, you know, after we derived 140 key physical variables by multiplying golden ratio times Planck. plonfire.com then Mark, with his new model of the vorticity that causes the geometry, the diameter of the proton, Mark then multiplied golden ratio times the diameter of the proton and got dozens, if not hundreds, of the cosmological variables, how the galaxy is glued together, for example, at fractalgut.com/cosmology.html, meaning that suddenly we don't need to be quite as, shall we be humble here, dumb as Einstein, who said gravity is what bends spacetime. He obviously ignominiously trying to hide the fact that he didn't know the cause of what bends anything, which is centripetal force. Why is anything centripetal, Mr. Einstein? Well, we think we have an answer to that.
Yeah. [laughter]
And then, interesting thing, Dan, is we, we've mapped from the proton to the cosmic microwave background.
Exactly.
And there's more. And there's, and when you go deeper into the proton, that's the Heisenberg uncertainty principle window, the five fractality, the perfect golden mean is what completes that to the lattice. So we go from the, the ether lattice to the proton surface to galaxies to the CMB, and all has to be, the only way it works.
Just like an RF engineer, you have to have perfect matching. So the math, everything has to match. And so, so my rebuild of the totu, I call it the, my rebuild of the totu, that by rebuilding it, I, uh, have Grok 4.5 said, I start off by saying, preserve as much as you can of the mainstream because I want to be able to talk to the mainstream audience. That's why these recent articles, you know, brought in Sabine.
Which is where we're going next.
Good. So, let's go ahead.
And but it just, I just want to emphasize what Mark just said, that isn't it incredible? One of the most central mysteries of all of physics, the cosmic background microwave radiation frequency of the whole damn universe. It appears the frequency, the tuning. You take the diameter of the proton, you multiply by golden ratio, and you just found the musical key signature of the universe singing by golden ratio charge collapse directly and accurately to the proton. Hello.
Yeah. And then as they advance their tools, as they measure with more precision the CMB, it should manifest these five patterns that we're talking about. And Mark has been tracking this.
So.
So we have predictions on the shelf, you know, waiting for them to expose. Like, it's a beautiful thing that NASA and James Webb do what they do because I'm like, "Thanks for the data." And it's just.
It's already stuff we're predicting, you know?
Boom. It's so cool. So, so since the next subject here is specifically uh Sabine Hassenfelder, we, we like, I like picking on Sabine Hassenfelder because she's famous, and yet there she is, announcing officially. Yes, she agrees with Roger Penrose that charge collapse is mechanism of gravity. Well, Sabine, how come you don't agree that now we know the cause of charge collapse? Planck times golden ratio, question mark. Anyway.
How about I try playing this video, Dan? It should be really. Mark is going to bring up. So Mark's new article about Sabine and charge collapse.
Yeah, we have your blank screen. That's it. Yes. Good.
Let's see if we get audio too. And this should be fairly short.
Which is why I've come to agree with Penrose that the collapse of the wave functions got to have something to do with gravity. Uh, so forget everything about complicated quantum experiments. Just imagine you send a single photon through a beam splitter. So beam splitters does what the word says. It's only two minutes.
So the wave function of the photon has a 50% chance of just going through and 50% chance of being reflected. And strictly speaking, this creates an entangled state with the beam splitter. So you have 50% chance that the momentum is actually redirected and the recoil is picked up by the beam splitter, and in the other event, nothing happens to the momentum. Now, the issue is the following. So you have some momentum going to the left and some momentum going to the right. And momentum is a physical thing, like you can measure it. It's definitely there. It's so small for a single photon that we can't, in practice, measure it. But it's, it's something. And so the moment the wave function collapses, this energy and momentum that went to the one side in your mathematics needs to go to the other side. How did this happen? It's not compatible with Einstein's theory of general relativity. It's that, that's just mathematically not possible. And so if you try to make this work within quantum mechanics, you need to do some weird thing where, you know, the energy from this particle actually went back into the past and then forward to the other side. And I think this is where these stories come from about retrocausality and mixed up causality and and and whatnot. But what I learned from this is that we need to think about how to quantify this energy so that it's compatible with general relativity because this is where the energy momentum conservation really comes from, which means it's got to have something to do with gravity.
So there, yeah, in other words, that proton, the, the photon, if it met by charge collapse, if it bounced at the center, and the only thing that allows it to bounce if it collapses to a center point, in order that it gets leverage, it finds something to bounce against. So effectively, charge collapse determined whether and where it bounced, and what made it collapse, which has come to a point we say is golden ratio fractality to plunk, and that's what we'd like to try to convince Sabine. But go ahead, Mark.
Yeah, and I was excited, uh, when I found that video because I remember when I've done videos with you in the past, you've mentioned Sabine, she says, and they say collapse, you know, is, is charge collapse is related to gravity or is gravity, but, but they would never go anything any further with it. And she's actually saying the wave function collapse, but that's, you know, we're, we're doing waves and it's, uh, so when I saw that, I made a post out of it. It's like, it's even after all the other posts because, you know, we're assuming a a super fluid ether and, and, uh, uh, Rouser, Elizabeth Rouser said that, hey, that's where we're going. We just don't know what type of super fluid ether it is. However, we're just assuming that when you assume that, and the the vortex model of the, uh.
Yes.
Proton. So, my latest. Yeah. So, so whenever I rebuilt the totu, is what I call it, the theory of the universe, I had to preserve as much as it could with just gave it the bare minimum. And, uh, so the whole idea, I used to think that the protons were created during the Big Bang, and that's just it. They're kind of static existences. However, what the analysis is showing is it's a continuous inflow. Sort of like what you've been saying. It's just a compression, but it's not just a one-time thing. It's continuous. So those are what some of the articles are. Maybe I should share.
Yeah, well, note that Penrose and Hawenfeller have also in other places agreed that wave collapse or charge collapse is mechanism of not just gravity, but also consciousness. So obviously, the central question is, what is the cause of charge collapse? You would think they would be interested in our answer, compelling that golden ratio times plunk fractality is the cause of charge collapse, and therefore gravity and consciousness.
Yeah. So this was about the third or fourth article I did after rebuilding the the totu, where I basically asked Grock 4.5 to consider the, hey, is this a continuous eternal action?
That's right. And he, you know, it, it's a pretty advanced thing, and it analyzes it, says, yes, it is within the framework. It's eternal collapse of charge into the lattice. It's not optional, it's required.
Right.
So as I'm doing this, that's when I realized that's what you've been saying all these years.
Exactly, exactly.
Just took a, took a while because I thought it was just like, Liz and I would talk about, this is probably why I couldn't get very far with her. I would say, yeah, when the proton electron created, there's some energy zaps them into existence, and there they are. Well, it's a continuous flow, like a, a whirlpool in a bathtub.
It's like blinking infinitely. It reminds me of my friend Dwayne Elgin's book, Theory of Continuous Creation, opposite of Big Bang theory, saying that it's happening continuously, and all you need to understand is the cause of collapse to understand the connection between the blinking, like the cosmic microwave background radiation being exactly golden ratio times the proton diameter. Hello.
Yeah. So what, what really was the key, like I mentioned, the RF stuff is, you have, if you have the exact proton solution, the proton radius puzzle solution, that's like matching your RF, you know, your, so there's no reflections. So locally, at the Heisenberg uncertainty principle window, it remains open, and phase conjugate, conjugate collapse continues without interruption.
Perfect. Perfect. So the, the, so the vortex is a topological state, and this also explains why the proton is infinitely stable, has a very long lifetime. It, it requires energy to disturb it. There's a, a couple, couple analyses where you all you have the proton radius is one thing, but because of the spin at the very center, you're, you're deviating some of the ether. So it actually requires energy to disturb the proton from that state. And the mainstream, they skip the vacuum energy, and they don't have that secondary stable thing. But anyways, I just found it so fascinating that it's a continuous compression.
Right.
And.
And.
Never, and it's a blink in and out. It never settles into a static thing, you know.
It, it's blinking by plunk time, and plunk times golden ratio as well. And this is where we get to five ordered collapse. And actually, right in this article are the next two subjects we want to talk about. Actually, Mark, if you could scroll to the top there again, this top of that article.
Yeah. And I just wanted to mention the collapse is a breathing dynamic, and we see that in galactic levels.
Exactly, that's exactly what we're saying. It's, it's literally breathing. So, um, eternal, the eternal collapse of charge into the lattice is not optional. That is those are the words which will introduce the next conversation here, which is how is that the cause of all action at a distance, and the conversation after that, which is that how is that collapse the cause of all spin. So these, those are the next two articles. So actually, so since we're going to do the, um, action at a distance article next, uh, Mark, if you would turn off screen display for a moment.
Yeah. Okay. Just so because I'm going to do the same here. So then I'm going to bring, bring up the, uh, Firefox. Yes, here it is. Yeah. Okay. So I actually had, um, Sabine up here also. But so the article we want to discuss next is [clears throat] how is this charge collapse the mechanism of all action at a distance. So this is the new article, fractalgut.com/nonlocal. [clears throat] The actual physics of action at a distance and non-locality is the opposite of spooky. So remember in [clears throat] conventional physics, when they talk about action at a distance, they start with the word entanglement and end with the word Einstein-Rosen bridge. And I contend in this article that entanglement is precisely what phase conjugate charge collapse perfects, which then embeds into the coherent longitudinal array, EMF array, the fractal array, literally this array of coherent longitudinal nodes, which is precisely what is behind the physics term for Einstein-Rosen bridge, which is actually the wormholes required are the fractal, fractal longitudinal EMF node bounce points, communicating at golden ratio, golden ratio multiples times C, light speed. Remember famously, when Professor Raymond Chow made thousands of measurements faster than light, he published that almost all of them were between 1.5 to 1.7 times C light speed, which is a bit of a smoking gun, centered around 1.618. In other words, I contend that when we prove that speeds faster than light are generally golden ratio times light speed, that is a smoking gun that we're right about the cause of gravity. And that is the communication in the array, which is the Einstein-Rosen bridge. Literally, when physics says, you know, you embed these waves, literally, you nest them perfectly. Embedding and perfect nesting is the problem that golden ratio fractal charge collapse solved. Literally, a caduceus of implosion is the perfection of entanglement because it's the perfection of embedding. So when you get that perfect nesting or embedding, you get this ability for these waves to recursively turn inside out, dimple, implode, and create centripetal force. And that's the next.
Yes.
One thing I want to say quickly, when I've seen your images like this before, I really appreciate it. It's good. When I finally tied it to the proton, because that's what our 3D, even though we don't need matter for gravity, but I think it helps. We're 3D physical beings, tying it to the proton, because the the platonic geometry matches exactly, and that's was the key thing. Even the Grock, the article said it, because that's the, the quantum foundation for your theory. I know you've tied it to the hydrogen diameter and all that before. I needed to see it on my own to totally believe it, you know, and it's so these images, the star mother, and all that tie right into the proton, right into the lattice. I, so it makes it easier for me to, to, to follow, believe, instead of you, when I have the quantum foundation, and that's, that's what's really key, and you do have it, but just we needed to formalize it mathematically, like, like we've done with Grock.
Yes. And, and just to show the picture from goldenmean.info/creation, this is the proven SPDF platonic nest geometry of the atomic table. The electrons are simple nest platonic solids. And as Professor Moon showed, that's also true of the geometry of the nucleus at tetra, cube, octa, ecosa. So the, the nucleus and the electron shells literally are only a simple recursive nest of platonic solids. And the reason for that is when you nest the platonic solids, you make by definition golden ratio charge collapse, which is what holds the atomic table together. So the platonic nesting idea of the proton applies directly also to the atomic table. Just to finish the thought about, um, non-locality and action at a distance. So once we get the idea that the physics of portals and stargates and wormholes is this phase conjugate charge implosion embedding you into the coherent longitudinal EMF array, uh, that makes the wormholes of action at a distance portals and stargates, and it makes the centripetal nest of that array into which you embed when you have clairvoyance or lucid dreaming. And we make that phase conjugate longitudinal field field with firray.com and we consistently trigger lucid dreaming and clairvoyance. We know what that is. That's embedding in the coherent longitudinal array. And the final point, just to introduce this article about how action at a distance works. The final point is that after you get this idea that there is an array, the only thing that enables that array to hold together is something centripetal at center. And if we are right, that apparently physics doesn't know what makes anything centripetal. And yet, when you lose a dream, or when you die, or when you have a soul, or when you, uh, travel in an array or a portal, something centripetal is holding that array together, and that is a function of consciousness also defined by charge collapse. So, for example, when you enter a lucid dream, or when you die successfully, is because not just that you embed in the array, that you become a centripetal force within that array. Visualize net of fireflies or Indra's net. And so the origin of centripetal force is necessary to understand how the array works. How, for example, dolmens and obelisks actually create water purification in the nodes of that longitudinal array, etc., etc. So anyway, this is a new article on the physics of non-locality and action at a distance as phase conjugate implosion collapse into the net of the coherent longitudinal EMF fractal array, and those nodes, for example, the sacred sites on the Earth grid, is not just where telepathy is possible, but it's where stargates and even another practical example, when we measured Jean Charles Moyen's brain waves as he would, uh, teleport replicably with witnesses, it was golden ratio EEG off the chart arts amplitude. And so that implosion enables him to inhabit, embed in that array, and the physics of his very well-witnessed teleportations. Those measurements are at flameinmind.com/lucidbrain. So, just to say, final metaphor here, the, in the famous animation of the imploding dodecahedron from Jodie Foster's film Contact, in which she either she travels interstellar or she lucid dreams. Either way, she goes a long way. [laughter] And the point is, it's the charge collapse in the dodecahedron that makes Jodie Foster's film Contact about lucid dreaming, your ancestors do the implosion that embeds you in that array. So anyway, I think there's a very interesting and useful conversation about non-locality. And then once you understand non-locality, you can understand all these spiritual stories and, you know, the teleportation and miracles. Suddenly, it's a very simple, teachable physics. And we remind you that, uh, Karatkov [clears throat] and Koser have proved that the nodes of that longitudinal array are the place where you can have replicable telepathy on the Earth grid. So, end of conversation about non, non-locality and how action at a distance works. The article is at fractalgut.com/nonlocal. I'm going to turn off the sharing here now, and we move to the next subject, which is, um, Mark's article about, does charge collapse cause the spin of the proton? And we ask the question, is, is in fact charge collapse the origin of all of spin? Like, if you're collapsing in a vortex, the translation of vorticity converts some of the centripetal inertia into rotational inertia. And the way that's coupled most ideally is by golden ratio on that spiral called optimized translation of vorticity when you study golden ratio in hydrodynamics. In other words, charge collapse is the motor of spin.
I hit share a little earlier there. Go ahead. I didn't want [laughter] to step over your image.
Perfect.
Yeah. So, so this again, I'm thinking of these questions as I'm rebuilding the totu, and that's right. I just, once it's rebuilt enough, I ask it things like, does the eternal charge collapse actually power the spin of the proton?
I love it. I love it.
Yeah. And this was after I had asked it about the, if it had to be the collapse was eternal, and then, and it said yes. But then it's like, okay, if it's eternal, let's talk about something specific. So that's because this is one of those puzzles in mainstream physics because even at absolute zero, there's still action happening with atoms that they don't freeze and just stop. There's.
I love action.
You're pictured like this.
Yeah. And the maze, Grock, Grock put this together. It's an AI generated thing, but it's, he's even generous enough to put your name in there. I did define it. See, when I defined it, I was trying to just give it a few things, and I said, when I asked it the questions, I said, "And go ahead and include some of Dan Winter's ideas," and then not for this question, the previous questions. But anyways, this almost looks like what Liz was describing to me, the, there's something feeding the proton, and that's the charge. You know, we've had this discussion before. Maybe everybody doesn't remember. You know, what is charge? It's actually a distortion of this ether. Just the minutest distortion of the ether is.
You say the compressibility of the ether is one word. Yes.
Yeah. Compressibility. I use distortion. I mean.
So, so the super fluid is the compressibility of the ether as charge. It kind of fits together, I think.
Yeah.
So, and that kind of goes along with the idea of those original people defining physics. They couldn't quite describe the electron. And this says, "Well, maybe it's, it's everywhere at once, you know."
Or there's only one. It just gets around.
Yeah. Well, this ether, like, see, what I think the proton is, is it's positive. And, you know, the derivations of this, I'm equating the angular momentum of the proton and the electron, whatever that is, to solve these equations. And so I'm, I'm picturing the electron is everything outside of the proton, and it just has this negative charge. Anyways, there's got to be a small amount of the ether filling in the vortex keeping it going. And that's, that's basically what GO says.
Uh.
Yeah, and we could visualize plus and minus charge as compression versus rarefaction of a superfluid compressible ether. Yeah. And then it has to be golden ratio cascades of of, you know, when you're sending in the, the charge, the frequency of it.
Only because it's the most irrational number, and it's the one that there's no destruction of the envelope of information. It's non-destructive charge collapse. It's.
The golden ratio is the only one. You proved it with your paper with Donovan and Martin with simulation.
Right.
Grok has done it with the final value theorem and other things. When you put those terms back in and.
And.
Go ahead.
So the wave inertia is able to be sustained during compression without loss because golden ratio perfects that constructive interference, and therefore compression, therefore implosion, therefore cause of gravity. And so now the next part of this conversation should be to understand why that charge collapse is the motor, which is essentially the cause of all spin. If, if you look at a donut, you can see the implosion towards center is coupled by the golden spiral to the rotation. So the cause of spin is the motor at the center. And I would like to add, as we're meditating, does charge collapse cause spin? I would like to introduce a meditation, which is, does charge collapse motorize the germination of a seed for the same reason, and the germination of consciousness in the brain for the same reason. Spin is the mind, the source of this. So let me, let me just read over some of this.
I'm having a slow internet there. I got you back now. Go ahead.
Okay. So, I just wanted to read over this a little bit so we don't put all my stuff in. How eternal charge collapse powers the spin.
I love this.
The eternal, the eternal charge collapse is the continuous self-sustaining phase conjugate implosion of charge into the lattice along golden ratio paths. This is not a one-time event. It's the dynamic content of the final value theorem selected attractor itself, and that's.
Very, very attractive idea. [laughter]
Yeah. And it, to me, it blows, it blows my mind. The attractor, they're saying is the prime number, uh, 2903 divided by 5 plus 42, that gives you that mass ratio. Those things are what eternal stability shows should be the answer. And we do have other equations to give that too.
But, uh.
I, I love this. This is music to my ears. And where you say that phase velocity is heterodyned constructively. What I've for years, that's acceleration named gravity. Phase velocity is heterodyned constructively because of golden ratio. And that's called gravity acceleration charge. So, so I'm excited about too, because Grock, you know, is really advanced, and it comes up with this with me just barely rebuilding it, because I, I'm trying, I said, keep the mainstream science there. That's why it talks about the spin crisis. It, it knows there's a spin crisis. So, so you've been talking about it for 30 years with your key insights, and you've said it many times, only the golden ratio scaling permits the non-destructive recursive wave charge compression. And I've heard it so many times.
Exactly.
It's like, okay, let's find out what this means. That's why, you know, the last year I've been really diving into it with Grock, because according to Elon, it's, it's nine PhDs plus, I think, now.
And, uh, you know, 20 to 30 years ago, as I was writing my second book, Implosions Grand Detractor, there's, there's no better vindication than solid physics.
Yeah. Now, we do have a little bit of serious simulation work to do, but all the evidence is pointing towards this winding number being four.
Uh, because if you read one of my more recent papers is on how do you prove a theory? Well.
Yes.
Levels of playing field. The mainstream theories aren't aren't provable, just like ours. It depends on certain assumptions. Well, and actually, that, and Mark, you know, that works so perfectly because we know that the golden ratio pentachord never stabilizes, uh, never gains stability unless the dodecahedron is organized first around the tetra cube at center, and the tetra cube at center, as you say, the four, in other words, the powers of two, the cubic lattice structures, is a prerequisite around which the golden ratio pentachord will stabilize. So you never get a dodecahedron imploding unless there's a stable cube at the center first. The power of four in your nest of the vortex there. I like it.
So when you have a collection of these proton vortices with mass gathered, you, each of them are sucking in some of the ether. And I think it's, it's a balance too. There's some inward flow and there's likely an outward flow too that, that will come in future analysis. Yes.
But, uh, so that, and this is what you've been saying is the centripetal acceleration from that charge.
That's what becomes gravity. You're spinning it in.
Perfect.
Exactly.
So it's the compression of it. So, so it, it perfectly makes sense what you've been saying. And it's, it's an inward force that sustains the vortex circulation.
Right.
So there's an in.
Yeah. Go ahead. And there's so many lovely insights in physical chemistry here now that we know the S sub, the S sub, you got SPDF suborbitals, and that's the whole atomic table electrons. S is a torus, two, two vortex, two electrons. And the pi suborbital is a tetra cube, protons, tetra cube, three, six, six protons. And the DF suborbitals are dodeca. The DF suborbitals form around the SP suborbitals. That means in chemistry, the pi suborbital external shells will be tetra cubic, more stable. And the DF suborbitals will be dodeca, more implosive, as in the phase conjugate lattice structure of Buckminsterfullerene and the noble gases that are phase conjugate, negentropic, and self-organizing. So suddenly you have all these lessons for physical chemistry once you understand the pure platonic nature of the difference between tetra cubic lattice powers of two versus dodeca coastal address, which is powers of golden ratio, implosive, centripetal, negotropic.
And there's equations behind all this. This Grock response is based upon the theory equations and my solutions for the proton radius. So, you know, it might sound nice just to say things like, you know, I'm going to read a little bit. The radial inflow collapse along five spirals continuously feeds energy momentum into the vortex, balancing and powering the tangential spin. Without this perpetual inflow, the quantized circulation would dissipate or lose topological protection. [clears throat] The final value attractor guarantees the process is eternal. Only five modes survive long term, keeping the collapse and breathing dynamics self-sustaining, self-sustaining forever. So, you know, we had one of our friends talk about, hey, doesn't quite like collapse. Well, it's not a traditional collapse. It's a collapse and breathing. It's, it's a continuous thing. It's not a one-time collapse like a building collapsing.
Yes. We, we say implosive collapse, and the implosive collapse is breathing. Exactly. And whether you call it collapse or implosion, the key is something has made it centripetal, which is.
And what made it centripetal is because when it reaches plunk by golden ratio, then there's a path outward, which is golden ratio multiples times C, the speed of light. Once you understand that the longitudinal wave that is embedded when you reach plunk by golden ratio, longitudinal wave defines gravity, if we believe Tom Bearden, gravity waves. And so that array means that there's a way out for the charge at the center of collapse. Answering the problem that absolutely stumped Einstein his whole life. He knew that non-destructive collapse means there must be a way out for charge through the center. He was right. The way out for charge through the center, at the center of collapse, is when the wave by golden ratio reaches the plunk threshold and is then converted into coherent longitudinal interferometry. The physics of what the gravity wave grid is made of. And that array is the gravity width of the grid of the galaxy. Why the galaxy breathes, the microwave background breathes to the proton diameter by golden ratio. And that breath, that charge distribution efficiency means that the dimensions of plunk and the proton, that agreement is the actual only real definition of the Big Bang. The Big Bang is actually the agreement on plunk. It's not the timing, an event. It's the geometry of a wave convergence.
Yeah. Yeah. I was going to say, I don't believe in the Big Bang, but I believe in the concept of bang, what you just said.
The continuous creation by Dwayne El. What makes it continuous is the breathing that that Mark is referring to.
Yeah. So I think it's continuous and likely infinite. Yes.
So, I wanted to mention, um, you know, you inspired me with your persistence on this stuff over the decades, and I just, I found out about you maybe 12 years ago with Liz, my wife, Liz Starwalker. I just wanted to mention, you know, her talking about her vision of the proton and spinning with the electron. All that inspired me, and when Grock came out, to really dive into this, because I like math. My big thing was math before engineering. So the Starwalker Fi transform, you know, that's, that's a tool that, let's say you're a starship captain, it's going to provide the scaling navigation tool. Because, you know, if you're talking about traveling from the cosmic microwave background, where it's very thin vacuum of space, towards Earth, or any galaxy where it's a lot denser, even near a black hole, it's a lot denser, uh, uh, ethers. There's a lot more matter there and energy. That's the scale. So, so anyways, that's just a side issue. There's, there's actually a serious math that one of my friends joked about, Starwalker Fire Trans. This is a serious thing for when you want to.
Yeah. It's.
You analyze it. It's, it's just like the, the any other transform, but just with a little bit of a fi focus, you know.
Which is golden ratio is the path between scales, but you can, you can change scale without changing ratio, and actually that's the path into the array, and that's why that's the path into lucid dreaming, and the path through death, and the physics of soul, because that non-destructive compression is what allows you to embed in that higher array where more axes of spin are superposed, called higher dimensions. And that's the physics then of why plasma compression, like firray.com, so consistently triggers lucid dreaming and medical clairvoyance, because that's embedded in.
The internet's gone slow on me.
To back.
Embedded implosion into the longitudinal array. So, it's wonderful that this has always come back to fi and implosion. Was there anything lastly that we needed to say about this article, then?
Uh, just right here, it, it's a paradigm level insight. I mean, this continuous process, I mean, it's not like a dead, static universe where, like mainstream says, it's entropic, it's going to have a cold death in the future, galaxies colliding, all crazy stuff, are blowing up. This is a dynamic, continuous process, and it, and you could even say it's a living process, too. So I think that's about all we, we have to say here.
It's beautiful. And, and the reason it's negentropic is because during that implosion, the waves that pass through that center must be sorted into phase with that center, that phase being golden ratio times plunk. And the waves that don't fit that phase discipline are self-canceled, and that's called self-organization or negentropy. So again, this is, for example, how and why when you have implosion called bliss in your aura, your your aura becomes more self-organizing, negentropic. And, uh, for example, in phase conjugate optics, how you make time reversal is that same phase conjugate charge collapse.
Yeah. So we, we can maybe move on to the next topic, Dan. And I did want to mention, if I didn't already, that the rebuild really focuses on, hey, it's a correction, arrest, restoration, and an addition of your fi ratio stuff. So, it's the, we're not doing anything new. We're just polishing the mainstream science. So, I know, filling the blanks.
Yes.
It can be really tough for some people, mainstream guys like me, to jump to some of the advanced topics, stargates and all that, but, uh, it's all important. It's all, so I like to, to deal with it all. But, uh, it was just fascinating that approaching it from this correction and restoration and adding the real simple things, adding the fi, we're not making any new science up, we're just polishing up what's there, and it, it's explaining all their mysteries and puzzles right now. [laughter]
And we're having so much fun doing it. And fractalgut.
Yeah. It's too much fun at times, I tell you. It's way too much. I have to be careful not to mock them too much because.
We don't want to pick on them. We just want to.
But, and fractalgut.com has gone rather viral. And so this brings up, as, as Mark says, leading us to the next article. The next article is about that if you understood the gravitational lensing in the attractor of that NASA photograph of the geometry of the arrangements of stars, you would, once you understand the nature of the golden ratio implosive attractor, the cause of gravity, then you don't need this dumb idea about dark matter, which is a word they invented just for the fact that they couldn't figure out there was more gravity than they knew where it came from. Now that we know that fractality caused the gravity, we don't need the dumb idea of dark matter anymore. So, um, I just wanted to, while while you're looking for that, Arthur, you're bringing that up.
I got it. I got it.
Okay. Well, just to say that, you know, the ETSs have told us the biggest Stargate portal in our galaxy is the cubic trapezium in Orion. If you line up all the masses, you make the biggest Stargate. Well, that's because you implode more centripetal force, and you get that leverage of that acceleration at the center. And so the concept of portal is essential to this nature of implosive collapse. But we'll get to that later. But.
You ready for a share?
Yes. Go ahead.
Okay. Yeah. So this one, you know, I was done doing posts and then NASA comes out with this, uh, article. I saw it on Facebook, but it was a link to a NASA thing. So I had the, the totu do an analysis of this image, uh, in a discussion, and it's basically a dense galaxy cluster that they captured. However, there's this halo of the ring, the dark part, the fuzzy part. They're talking about this halo, this ring, and I'm like, "Hey, I better analyze that because that looks perfectly like this breathing ether thing that we're talking about."
Nice.
And, you know, they're using dark matter, saying they're actually claiming that this is evidence of dark matter. I'm like, [laughter]
"Oh, good. That's, that's going to help me out with my analysis with the totu, you know."
And so I won't click on the NASA Facebook link, but, and we'll maybe after the video's up, I'll put some of these links in so it's easier for people to find in the comments. I'll put them in.
Please.
So, you know, basically, it's either a stunning Hubble or James Webb Space Telescope style exposure shows a rich galaxy cluster in the center, surrounded by prominent ring-like structures of elongated arc-shaped blue and white galaxies. And, uh, these arcs are classic strong gravitational lensing features. So, I'm thinking that they're probably meaning like these ALC galaxies. There's white ones and maybe some blue ones stretched. Maybe they are stretched. At first I thought the arcs was the the mist what they were talking about. Like looks like there's almost tentacles. So like here's some white and blue. So it might be the stretching there that they're talking about. So that would take some studying to completely understand. And that's one thing about this, Dan. I learn mainstream ideas while testing the totu, because it's, it's hard to know everything, you know. So our article, you know, Grock does the mainstream interpretation. It's visible mass, dark matter invoked as the invisible glue.
Invisible.
Yeah. Non-baryonic. That means like the proton is a baryon. So they're using a non-baryonic explanation, and in a sense, we're using a a super fluid, and a baryon, the proton is going to help us explain that.
So anyways, you know, they're saying up here in the, whoops, I, I hate when that happens.
Non-baryonic would essentially might mean also plasma-based rather than proton-based. Another way of thinking.
Yeah. Yes. So, and the other thing that makes us curious is a good example. This is one of the strongest lines of evidence for dark matter.
Hello. [clears throat]
Yeah. So, so here they are with a fantasy of dark matter.
Yeah.
Reinforcing, digging themselves in deeper, you know.
Every time they use the word dark matter, think, "Oh, that's their word for we don't know what caused the gravity."
Yeah. Now, when Sabine and, uh, the other guy, shoot Penrose, were where they were talking, Grock analyzed that and says, you know, one of the problems is they're in separate silos. Their theories don't all overlap and match. And by using our superfluid golden mean approach, it unifies the theories. So it's easier to talk about them and to explain what you know, Sabine saw as a problem. The superfluid ether with the fi resolvent, it handles that stuff. It's no problem. Even neutrinos is part of this explanation. It's a side topic, but quantum quakes and disturbances in the ether, all these unusual things all make sense in a superfluid ether type thing. And that they used to call it the luminiferous ether. And I think the thing is, it's hard to detect the ether when you're immersed in it. And that's why the Michelson-Morley experiment, I believe, failed. It, it has to be done more carefully. And, you know, right now, the indirect proof is all the galaxies and all the evidence we're seeing that supports this idea of a super fluid ether. So that's why this was a good thing. And it, it, you know, the ring and the arcs are real manifestations of the ether's lattice, ether lattice's coherent response to the central mass. So it's a huge collection of cucor protons. So I look at that, and and I see it way different than dark matter. It's just all these protons. I mean, galaxies, these are huge. But there's, there's going to be, since it's a living, breathing dynamic universe, all this is interconnected. You know, like in some spiritual teachings I've been involved in, personal development, they point out that the movement of one atom affects the universe, you know, and it's ever so slightly, but it does. And there's, they make that to be significant. Well, it is significant because it's totally related, and that does get into the spiritual, metaphysical stuff where you say we can steer our own tornadoes and stuff like that, because if we are.
If we are these conscious vortices, imagine aligning all of your protons that you have under your command.
You're going to be able to do something like, like this. And this is a huge demand. Yeah. And the idea is that when, when you get sent.
I'm kind of.
You have leverage on the tornado, and it's everything's made of tornadoes or vortex. That vortex theory is ancient. When you combine that with tooids, and then you combine that with golden ratio collapse. So that, what is amazing here is that no one actually asked the question, uh, what was centripetal at the center? Their word gravity, which is what's centripetal at the center, is a word for we don't know what made it centripetal. So they use the word gravity to hide the fact that they don't know what it is. We say it's implosive charge collapse due to golden ratio, and that's the centripetal force that organized it into golden ratio fractal layers in that array. Yeah. So the, the protons are like lattice defects, and there's a whole bunch of them in those galaxies. So the lattice undergoes compression and breathing modes towards the defects, towards the drains. So that's why it's all interconnected, you know, and the fi resolvent, this is Dan Winter's mechanism integrated into the totu, and the final volume attractor, thermum attractor, this stuff, it, it's built right, well, was built right into the theory, but it shows and supports this idea of stable breathing modes that we're seeing right here in this picture.
The, the breathing stabilizes around golden ratio, and, you know, if you map the, the frequencies of the breath, it becomes the heart rate variability and the spine liquid pump and the physics of Kundalini, and all of that is literally golden ratio cascades tuned by the way, by the Schumann cascade, which is also golden ratio phase conjugate.
pump wave so it is literally about breathing golden ratio.
>> Yeah, so dark matter is reinterpreted as the physical ether lattice itself. That's why I was saying we got to be careful on calling the dark matter people, "Hey, that's imaginary stuff, you idiot!" Because it's, it's, it's not completely imaginary. However, I want to focus on the imaginary idea in just a second here. So, it's the physical ether lattice itself. It's a compressible, negentropic superfluid whose continuous charge collapsed towards vortices produces an inward force we measure as gravity. No new particles are required. The invisible glue is the structured vacuum whose properties are already fixed by the same geometric principles that fix the proton radius and mass ratio.
>> That is so beautiful. And by the way, proton radius times golden ratio equals cosmic microwave background radiation is a beautiful example of exactly that.
>> Yeah. So the mainstream sees an invisible halo bending light via space-time curvature. Tou sees the physical lattice breathing and compressing around visible matter, bending light via the medium's own dynamics. So it's the slight, you know, gradient in the ether that's going to be breathing, you know, the density of of all that ether because of the matter in the center and the fi ratio. That's why you're going to change the refractive index or whatever it bends light. So it, it makes, it's a lot easier when you look at it like that. And the other thing, Dan, is is the imaginary part I want to mention. Like in electrical engineering, when we analyze inductors and capacitors versus resistors, it takes imaginary math. The, uh, that's mining your P's and Q's. As you notice in some of my posts, I kind of joke about that without explaining it. That's the in-phase and quadrature. Quadrature being the imaginary. Well, if we apply some of these ideas to this superfluid ether in the James Webb Space Telescope, looking way back in time is seeing things that they didn't expect. Way more galaxies, much way much more activity. And you say, "How could this happen?" Well, when we, when you got this infinitely huge universe of superfluid ether with, I mean, there's waves or whatever flowing through it due to the, there's compression in certain areas where you're flowing towards those confluences of, there's energy stored in there in the imaginary field. That's what I'm calling it imaginary because we use electrical engineering imaginary numbers. Well, there's energy stored in inductors and capacitors. That's that's real energy versus a resistor. It, it, it's real energy, but it's turns it to heat right away. But you can store energy in this imaginary space of capacitors, inductors. So I'm figuring that's what happens in this ether and that's why you can create protons from the vacuum when the right conditions are there. So these cataclysms or whatever the breathing, you, you get some intersections of nodes, waves where if there's enough energy in those waves, you can create some proton defects and that can cascade into more protons and that's galaxy growth. You can have galaxy growth, seeding of galaxies. So, and most of them start with a black hole. And I haven't addressed how do the black holes get there in the first place, you know, and that's a dynamic. There's a big argument over what a black hole is, but I just wanted to mention that because the matter can come out of nothing, what, what we would appear, it's not nothing. It's still a balance of energy, but it would look like it's coming out of nothing if you didn't understand. And you can see dozens of examples.
>> I hope I made that point.
>> Well, and you can see dozens of examples of Mark's modeling of golden ratio in the geometry of galaxies at fractalgut.com/cosmology.html. And just to say that when the mainstream says that, uh, you know, gravity is bending, uh, space-time curvature, but when in our theory of everything, we're saying you're bending light via, we now we're the first ones to know the cause of the bending because we're the ones that now know the cause of centripetal force that does the bending. So I say again, when Einstein said gravity is that which bends spacetime, he was ignoring, hiding the real question, which is what centripetal force does all the bending, which is fractal charge collapse.
>> Yeah. And I, I think this stuff makes it easier to to look at. Even Grock says the math is going to get a lot easier to handle. Uh, and some people get afraid of talking about it cuz and I, I kind of assume people must know some of the mainstream science. If, if you don't get afraid of that, this is even easier than that stuff. That stuff, you got to study all kinds of crazy stuff to realize it's a lot of it's a dead end.
>> But it's
>> I love, I love Mark's summary here. He says, "Five ordered charge collapse simultaneously. A fixes the proton. B produces gravity. C drives negentropy. C bends the light." D, I mean, that is so perfect.
>> Yeah. So it's incredible. Here we are. You know, I can, I know now why you've been saying five ratio collapse for all these decades because it explains everything.
>> There it is right there. Four sentences. Five ordered charge collapse fixes the proton, produces gravity, drives the entropy, and bends the light. Hello. Have we summarized? I think so.
>> And and the fi can be proven. I've done it so many times mathematically with the theory. And and as long as the mainstream goes back and puts in a couple terms, they drop. Use a transform final value theorem and they'll be crap in their pants because five falls right out. [clears throat] It's not numerology. It's they keep on infecting people's mind with, "Haha, that's numerology."
>> Oh no, it's pure. It's the purest form of wave mechanics. When you have generalized wave equations that prove golden ratio is the solution to constructive wave interference. There is no more pure essential geometric wave mechanics than golden ratio. [snorts] And and the fact that we call it an irrational transcendental number is childish because if we were using base 12 like the Pleiadians said we would, that number is not irrational, by the way.
>> Right. Right. Language has been hijacked. We've been fed everything, our alphabets, language.
>> Just a quick one here on the ghost moons. Liz had mentioned this article on the Lagrange points around Earth, like L1, L2 there. And some other guy predicted there's a moon there, but it's just clouds. And it's actually, you with the more sensitive telescopes, they've detected these ghost clouds, cordales, dilleski clouds. And that is the same lattice preferring stable, coherent configurations at the Lagrange points. So there's tons of evidence of this breathing coherence out there. And as we get more and more sensitive measurements, they're going to be proving our theory for us more and more. Like even that Q equals 4 winding number, the mainstream says winding number of one is the only thing that's stable. But you add the vacuum back, that changes, but it's a big simulation that might take a week or so to prove the Q=4 winding number. So that's an outstanding thing I have to do. However, I realized the mainstream likely will be solving it for us. So, I'm looking for papers on it. I'd like to set it up because because Grock Build can do the analysis for me, but I, I got to get my job going, my new job, and focus on that. This stuff is too much fun, but I got to make sure it doesn't take me away from from my work. You know.
>> Your dedication is amazing. But and a final thought on the Lagrange point. Lagrange point is basically a gravitational zero point. And obviously the gravitational point is a golden ratio layered. An analog would be the zero point in a, a cup-shaped magnetic well. There's a zero point where magnetism goes to zero. It's all cancel in all directions. And that zero point, that still point is a place of leverage also because of fractal charge collapse. And so obviously this, this layering that produces these still points, whether it's gravitational or magnetic, is going to be the golden ratio principle of perfected charge collapse ultimately.
>> Yeah. So I feel pretty good about this, Dan, because it's converging on what you've been saying. Uh, the math, the simpler I make it, it starts to say what you've been saying.
>> Thank you. Thank you. I am so grateful.
>> Yeah. And you know, I'm, I'm not a yes man. That's why, you know, you had interviews with you where I said I thought you were crazy. [laughter]
>> But, uh,
>> After more than 10 years.
>> Yeah. And it's, I could, anyways, I could never understand how people go off in different directions because it takes integrity, the virtues, and honesty. You know, you focus on the problem. And I wonder how people get so, like, like, uh, some of these groups like, well, how can they not make progress? And they're, they're dropping the fi because of
>> They're afraid of ego.
>> They're afraid. Once, once you admit fi, suddenly you realize the path of bliss. You realize the path through the zero point. You realize the physics of soul. All of these things emerge very quickly. The Catholic Church is afraid of golden ratio. Monroe Institute is afraid of golden ratio. Ashiana Dean's afraid of golden ratio. And why? It's the same physics because once you have that implosion path, you can be self-organized. It is the origin of all sovereignty. And we will get to the spiritual components of this in another video. But I
>> I think we should conclude this video with again saying, for the fourth time, quoting from this screen: "Five ordered charge collapse simultaneously fixes the proton, produces gravity, drives negentropy, and bends the light." Hello. Have we had summary, guys? [laughter] Have we answered the
>> I think we've answered it. So, and I'm hoping to encourage, you know, Sabine and others to to take a look at this. I mean, because
>> They're when they see how simple it is,
>> You, you treat the proton, electron separately. You don't try to make too many reductionist assumptions, and it all falls out. So,
>> All these people like Penrose and Toss and Felder who have been, and and Nim who've been saying charge collapse causes gravity. Charge collapse causes consciousness. Well, now who has answered the question of what causes charge collapse? [laughter]
>> Right. So, we'll have to be nice to them so we can get them on board. [laughter]
>> We won't tease them too much. Okay. On that note,
>> I sometimes fantasize about the future where like all the people who maybe dismissed me or you, they're going to be forced to study this stuff because it's, it's, I even get so bold with Grock to say, "Is this it?" And Grock won't admit it because we have to have lots of scientific proof, but it's such a thin, it's a such a solid mathematical proof. I don't see how there could be any other answer. [laughter] There we go. We have collapsed the point. Have we made our point? Yes, we have imploded. So, on that note, thanks everybody. Stay tuned with us. The, thanks Mark for all your work at Fractalgut. You can see us at fractalgut.com and Mark's blog. We'll have the links.
>> Thanks everybody. It has been great fun. Mark, you're wonderful. Blessing.
>> Thanks, Dan. Bye.