Transcription
At that point, Justin Strife, who is the uh COO of Turning Point USA, messaged my husband, called my husband and wanted to know whether or not I had recorded it. My husband has no idea what he's talking about. He's not. He's like, he runs the business. He's like, "I don't know what you're talking about." He then comes out to me. He's like, "Justin Strife keeps asking if you recorded this. What's he talking about?"
Okay, now let's get to Andrew Kovette. All right, cuz what Andrew Kovette said here, so this is the first post. So, I know people have been talking about this, but Andrew Kovette actually shared two clips. So, there were two clips shared from this, relatively short clips of Candace talking about different situations with Andrew Kovette. And he snapped back at Candace and addressed both of them with the same post, with the same post. So, I'll just show you this one real quick and then this one real quick. So these are two different posts here and Andrew Kovette is saying the exact same thing on both of them. All right.
So what is he saying? He's saying, "False, absolute lies and garbage." So what is he referring to? Well, for this first one, let's let Candace describe what Andrew considers false and absolute lies and garbage. And I know she's lying because then somebody in Andrew Kovette's family orbit reached out to me and said that that definitively happened because Andrew said that when Charlie said no, he lost millions. Andrew Kovette lost millions. When Charlie said no. Now you wonder how does a PR guy lose millions? He's a spokesperson for Turning Point USA. And then I had to remind myself that he owns a piece of the Charlie Kirk show, which was at that moment with Salem. Salem has recently filed, you know, under FARA. They're working with that, uh, Faith by Works and the whole thing, and Salem is a part of that filing. So they are effectively foreign agents.
BB Netanyahu calling and Charlie not just refusing it, but he had anger towards BB. He did. And how do you know? Because BB Netanyahu that month did a ton of shows. Very strange. By the way, a prime minister of Israel was suddenly hitting the orbit doing PR. He did a ton of shows. I mean, Patrick Bet David's show, Brandon Tatum's show. And he hadn't before that done any sort of podcasting since he was like hawking his book, you know, like years ago. He didn't do the Charlie Kirk show because Charlie didn't want to have him on.
Okay, Andrew saying, "Absolute false or false, absolute lies and garbage." What's false? What is false specifically? Like again, this is one of my frustrations, which is one of the consistent ones with Turning Point USA, is just sharing this post with what Candace is saying here, because there's a number of different things that she's saying here. What is false? Address what is being said. They constantly are just responding and saying these things of just like, "Oh, this is false. She's crazy." But they don't actually, they don't actually debunk or go after what specifically is being said. Explain to us specifically what is false and garbage about this. Was there a deal on the table? Was there a deal on the table that would have benefited not necessarily Turning Point USA, but the media company that Andrew Kovette and Charlie Kirk co-owned? Andrew Kovette and Charlie Kirk co-own the media company that operates the Charlie Kirk show. Okay. What deal was turned down? Was there a deal proposed? And was the deal turned down?
Here is some insight into potentially why I believe what Candace Owens is saying here is true. And this all relates to the Charlie Kirk show and Andrew Kovette's media company. Charlie Kirk's not with us anymore. Andrew Kovette's and potentially Erica Kirk's media company billing being affiliated with Salem Media and Brad Parscale, who, as Candace mentions there, is the FARA registered agent on behalf of the Israeli Foreign Ministry. Okay. Under this FARA registration, Salem Media is responsible for distributing pro-Israel content to the youth across America. This is documented. It's a fact. It is a fact. We also know that prior to Charlie Kirk's death, he was interested, he knew about. Okay. Okay. He was interested in exploring independent media distribution platforms because he was concerned about Brad Parscale's foreign involvement. He knew about what Brad Parscale was up to. He knew what Salem Media was up to. And Charlie Kirk was exploring independent distribution for his show. He was interested in what Tucker Carlson was doing with his independent network. Charlie was pursuing that. Okay.
After Charlie Kirk was killed, after Charlie Kirk was killed, Andrew Kovette and the media company renegotiated with Salem Media. They took the Charlie Kirk show out of the live slot that they were required to be in every day, and they changed it to a podcast slot, which allowed them more flexibility for the main reason being, what, you might ask? For the main reason of being able to target younger audiences by not having a required time slot to hit with Salem Media every day. Think about that. They make a change. They renegotiate a deal, the Charlie Kirk show and Andrew Kovette's media company to be in a better position to reach the youth across America with a podcast rather than a live show setup. The chief strategy officer for said media distributor is Brad Parscale, who is a registered foreign agent, who is taking millions and millions and millions of dollars from the Israeli Foreign Ministry. We also know that Israel quadrupled its PR budget to win over young people in America. Maybe, maybe all of these things exist separately from each other. Maybe, but it certainly doesn't seem that way.
So, I want to ask this. I want to pose this question. I want to put this one out here. I want to float this idea into the atmosphere, into the ether. Does this large payout, does this large payout to Salem Media, the media company that was owned by Charlie Kirk and Andrew Kovette, in accordance with this massive quadrupling of the Israeli Foreign Ministry's, or of the Israel government's, excuse me, PR budget, knowing they have an existential requirement to win the media war, the social media war, the eighth front that BB Netanyahu refers to constantly in America. Was some of that money? Was some of this large payout going to be involved in that? Was some of that large payout going to benefit Salem Media or the connected Charlie Kirk show, Andrew Kovette's company? I think it's worth asking. It's worth asking because of their affiliations and their connections and what's going on right now.
Okay, now let's get into this next clip that Andrew says is false. "Absolute lies and garbage." And then after this clip, because this one got a response from Candace Owens. And then I want to bring up a very early post, the famous post. You guys all know what it is, of Andrew Kovette. It's, it's the man, it's the neck of steel post. It's the neck of steel, the Christian miracle post, because Andrew says something in that post that, believe it or not, adds credit to what Candace Owens says here. Let's take a listen.
"This was the day of Charlie's actual funeral, not the WWE memorial event, but the actual funeral, which was the night before. And they panicked that I had seen the footage. And somebody at the FBI called Turning Point and asked explicitly to Justin Strife whether or not I had recorded it. At that point, Justin Strife, who is the uh COO of Turning Point USA, messaged my husband, called my husband and wanted to know whether or not I had recorded it. And my husband has no idea what he's talking about. My he's not. He's like, he's like, he runs the business. He's like, 'I don't know what you're talking about.' He then comes out to me. He's like, 'Justin Strife keeps asking if you recorded this footage. What's he talking about?'"
And instantly in my mind, I said, "That's a really weird question. Why does it matter? Why does it matter if I recorded the footage?" And I said, "Don't answer him. I'll deal with it." And then what happened on the, this is all happening on the day of Charlie's actual funeral. No one should be caring about back footage, anything. Why is the FBI calling? What then happened was Erica peeled off from Charlie's actual funeral, his wife, and she called the surgeon with Andrew Kovette on the phone, a three-way call. And the story that Andrew would then write, cuz then he tweeted on the day of Charlie's funeral and said, "People want to know why there was, you know, no blood." And then the surgeon says that it was a miracle. And you remember this ridiculous tweet. Charlie ate really healthy and this, it normally it would have taken down a moose, but he really was the man of steel and this is like a modern-day Christian miracle. I mean, total slop for the masses. And everyone then went, "What the f? It didn't go through. Like, you're confirming this didn't go through. Something's wrong here." Right.
So, what Candace Owens just said right there is that Charlie had a private funeral the day before his larger memorial, the larger show memorial that included everybody, the public there talking about it and eulogizing Charlie. He had a private funeral the day before. And during that funeral, what Candace is saying here is that Erica stepped out to have a conversation with the surgeon, with the surgeon, which then produced the post and the tweet, the man of steel, the infamous tweet from Andrew Kovette saying that Charlie stopped the bullet with his neck. And what I find pretty interesting about that is this. So, I want to take a look at this post because it adds credibility here to what Candace is saying.
So obviously Andrew says, "I want to address some of the discussion about the lack of exit wound with Charlie. I'm usually not interested in delving into most of this kind of online chatter, and I apologize that this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the fact that there wasn't an exit wound is probably another miracle. I want people to know." And then you see that line right there. "I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital. He said the bullet absolutely should have gone through, which is very normal for a high-powered, high velocity round. I've seen wounds from this caliber many times, and they just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two down an elk, etc. But it didn't go through Charlie. Charlie's body stopped it."
All right, that line, that highlighted line that you see right there, "I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie at the hospital." This post was made at 7:57 p.m. You can see that there at the bottom. 7:57 p.m. on September 20th, 2025. Charlie's big memorial was September 21st, 2025. All right. So, what Candace Owens just said, and I'm repeating it because I want to emphasize what she just said, is that that private funeral that Charlie had was the day before. It was the day before, which would be September 20th. Andrew Kovette is saying, "I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie at the hospital." September 20th, 2025 at 7:57 p.m.
What we also must take into consideration is that the surgeon, this is a question, is the surgeon just going to just going to talk with and speak to Andrew Kovette here, the business partner of Charlie Kirk, the friend of Charlie Kirk? I believe there are, are there not medical laws that would prevent a surgeon or a doctor from providing this type of information to, like, a spokesperson of a company, a media person, or a friend? Is it, would it not be required? I'm asking this question. Would it not be required for Erica Kirk to have also been on that phone call? I see you guys in the comments. It's HIPAA, right? It's HIPAA. Would Erica Kirk have been required to be on this call in order for this information to be given to Andrew Kovette? I believe the answer to that is yes. So, I don't believe that Andrew would have just been able to speak with the surgeon and get this information on his own. Right. Right. Erica Kirk would have had to have been on this call.
So, what's becoming pretty evident here is that what Candace Owens is saying, as long as that funeral, that private funeral was the day before on September 20th, 2025, per this post, Andrew Kovette says, "I just spoke with the surgeon." He would not have been able to get that information if Erica Kirk, without Erica Kirk being on that call as well. And then, and then giving this to all of us. So there's no question that both Andrew Kovette and Erica Kirk were involved in getting this information, which then put this post out, and it is on the same day. I'm not sure of the times. This post occurred at 7:57 p.m. So I would assume that if he's saying "I just talked to the surgeon," it was maybe within the last one or two hours, maybe, or maybe even less. Right? I think that would all follow. I mean, that's like how common sense would all follow here, right?