Transcription
Let me walk you through, uh, some things that Tucker Carlson has, uh, just released. And I want you to hear it not as partisan, uh, but as an American who I think deserves straight answers because there's, there's something happening in our country and, uh, we all know it. And it's easy for us to get lost and go down the road of conspiracies.
Uh, and you know, one of my favorite lines from, uh, John Kennedy, you know, Senator John Kennedy, is, "We need some new conspiracy theories, 'cause the old ones all turned out to be right." Um, and we don't need new conspiracy theories. What we need are conspiracy facts. And we are starting to see the outline of something that does not, should not make everybody feel really good. Uh, and I'll get into that here in just a second.
But first, the more we learn about Thomas Matthew Krooks, this is the would-be assassin that got within an inch, a fraction of an inch of, uh, killing President Trump. The story bends in Washington. And when a story bends, that, that tells me somebody is very, very busy trying to keep it from breaking. From day one, the FBI and their cheerleaders in the mainstream media, MSNBC, CNN, the whole alphabet soup, all pushed one storyline. Krooks was pro-Trump, anti-immigration, a fringe right-winger radicalized by MAGAs. Remember that? That's what the Biden FBI came out and said about him. Case closed. And then we never heard anything else because the, the case, the story isn't just, it's incomplete. And as we're finding out now, it is also very, very misleading.
We were told over and over again, he had almost no online footprint. How many times did you hear that, Stu? He had almost no online footprint.
>> Yeah, I do remember, as you kind of mentioned, bits and pieces that came out about, oh, he said this, but he, it wasn't a prolific poster was always what they said.
>> Yeah. And you know, how did this guy come up with this sophisticated way to kill without having any online footprint? Okay. So, apparently, there's a very large footprint. Um, he had a Discord account, a Snapchat account. He was extremely active on YouTube, his comment history. And that's where things start to get really, really strange.
So, let me take you through the phases of the guy who tried to kill Donald Trump. Here's phase one. In 2019. Violent, yes, but directed at Democrats. In 2019, Krooks' YouTube comments were violent, very violent, no question. And but they were directed almost entirely to anti-Trump people and Democratic officials. When I say violent, he was talking about decapitations and shootings, taking out government officials. Now, we all know, I mean, you may not know, I know, um, but you may just feel like, of course, that's happening. The government is monitoring everything, okay? There are keywords, "decapitation of," fill in the politician, that shows up, that rings alarm bells. If you are talking about violent things and politics, you get on a list. It's just. And it, and you know, you should get on a, you're talking about things like this, taking out government officials. You should, the government should be monitoring stuff like that. Now, remember, this is in a period when the US government, we later have learned, was monitoring social media more aggressively than any other point in US history. Okay? They were looking for these kinds of things. People were arrested for memes at this time. But Krooks, nothing. Nothing. Not a warning, not a knock on the door, not one single action. Why? Why? Because he, at that time, was apparently a MAGA supporter. Why was there no knock on his door?
Okay, now he has a pivot. And I'm not really sure why this happened. Something happened and it might have been COVID. But here's the part of the story no one ever told you. In 2020, Krooks' online comments, they flip and they flip dramatically. Suddenly, he is violently anti-Trump. He is anti-Trump supporters and again, still extremely violent. But the FBI and the media, why did they only report the first half of the story, the half that fit the predetermined storyline? I think we all know that's the way the system was working. Why leave out the part where he abruptly becomes very anti-Trump? Why not tell the, the American people the whole truth? Why frame him exclusively as a pro-Trump radical when the, when the data clearly contradicts this? He was, and then he wasn't. You tell me.
Okay, then enters somebody we don't know who this is, named Willie Teps. Te pes. He's the ghost in the machine. Around the same time of the flip, a bizarre online persona appears in Krooks' orbit. Willie Teps. Now, this account begins encouraging Krooks' violence openly, agreeing with assassinations, approving of attacks on government officials. But here's the kicker. The name Willie Teps appears on a National Socialist website in Sweden. Now, we don't know if that's the Willie Teps, but that's the one you can find online. And we know for a fact that the State Department and the intelligence community monitor these circles aggressively. Okay? So now you're, you have our State Department, we have our intelligence community that is monitoring people online, especially Nazis in the rest of the world and Nazis here. And yet there's nothing. Not a single red flag is triggered. Not a single investigation, no monitoring, no intervention. So why was this FBI monitoring, you know, Catholic churches and priests, but nothing on Thomas Matthew's Krooks? Why? You're going to have to draw your own conclusions. And I honestly don't know the reason. I have fears, but I don't know the reason.
Now, here's where his YouTube history goes absolutely insane. As the assassination attempt neared, Krooks' search history explodes. Tucker laid this out. He searched Trump hundreds of times. He searched Jack Ruby. He searched bomb making, car attacks, sniper attacks, successful assassinations, how to escape police gunfire. All of these things should ring every NSA alarm bell. Nothing. Again. Nothing. Not then, not during the attempt, not afterward. They didn't try to stop him. They didn't stop him. They didn't prevent or try to prevent. They didn't warn anyone. Instead, as soon as he was shot, they rushed out a narrative, a very specific narrative, and then they shut down anything that conflicted with it.
Okay, as if that's not weird enough, here's where it gets even more unusual. The FBI, Trump's own FBI at the time, kept all of Krooks' shifting political and violent history quiet. Okay, I understand it when it's Biden's FBI, but now Trump's FBI. Now, why didn't Trump's FBI immediately come out? Because I, I know that. Yeah. But Dan Bonino, I, we have it on tape where he is saying the guy had no footprint, no digital footprint. And he's in, he's being questioned in front of the senator of the House and he's like, "Look, that's not possible. There's no way this 20-something year old had no digital footprint." Well, now he's, he's second in command at the FBI. He would know this. Why didn't the FBI do anything? And I want to be really careful on Trump's FBI or Biden's FBI because I'm not sure there's a difference anymore. It's, I want you to think of the FBI and this deep state. I want you to think of an iceberg. Okay? You see an iceberg and you just see just the top of it. Two-thirds of that is under the water. So, we're seeing the tops change. And we're seeing people put in at the top and we're like, "Oh, the iceberg is different now." But I'm not sure that anybody has any idea how deep that iceberg goes. So, I'm not even, I'm not willing to blame the people up at the top. I'm, I'm questioning, does anyone know how deep this goes? Because I don't think it matters who's running it.
Even more bizarre, they suddenly release the body for cremation. There's no extended autopsy. There's no forensic review. There's no independent experts. It's just all gone. And the crime scene is washed and scrubbed. It's all washed, literally washed and scrubbed before a full reconstruction can be done. Why would you do that? You don't do that in a presidential assassination attempt. You don't do that in a local homicide case unless you want something gone. Unless you want something buried. Unless you want a narrative and only that narrative to survive.
So that's what Tucker laid out today. Now, based on this, there are questions that need to be asked. And so let me give you a list of the questions that I have that need to be asked and we must demand answers. You feel the republic slipping through your fingers. If we do not correct these things, we have, we do not have a government of, by, and for the people. We don't. You must answer these questions. We must demand these questions be answered.
So let's start with some questions that have to be asked just on this case. Why did the FBI present only the early pro-Trump posts and they hid the anti-Trump phase? There's two answers that need to be had. The first one is under Biden, and I think we know the answer to that. They were building a narrative. Okay, but it should be asked and answered. Why did that happen? Who was involved in that decision? Then you have to say, okay, after the election, why did the FBI still tow that line? Who made that decision?
Next, we know they're monitoring people. I'm for the government finding, hey, how do I build a bomb? How do I get away from an assassination, uh, scene? Successful assassinations, and where are these political people being, you know, where are they going to be in the future? That is, that should be tied together by an algorithm and it should be notified. So, somebody is watching this. Okay, we know it's already being done. So why did they ignore Krooks' really unbelievable threats when ordinary Americans were arrested for memes? Why was he completely ignored? Why did the intelligence agency monitoring extremism somehow miss a kid openly fantasizing about assassinations and then connecting with some guy it looks like is from Sweden who is part of a big Nazi movement over in Sweden? Why was that ignored? Why did they clean the scene prematurely? Why was every digital trace of his political shift kept out of the public discussion? Why did they say he had almost no footprint when the footprint looks to be really, really large? It was just scrubbed. Why did every single mistake that our FBI and government made, why does it seem to point in the same direction towards ignorance, negligence, hiding inconvenient data, shaping a political narrative? When every accident points the same way, it stops looking like an accident.
So, was this incompetence? I don't know what conclusion Tucker is pulling from all of this. I just appreciate the information. And I'm not telling you this is a conspiracy. I am telling you there's something wrong here. There's something very wrong. The, the official story is impossible to believe. And the question every American should be asking themselves is really simple. Why would our government, the same government that monitors everything, suddenly become blind, deaf, and mute the moment a presidential assassin emerges on their radar? It's not a partisan question because one, under one president, you can say, "Oh, well, that's because they were doing an air." But then when the presidents changed, and this president was the one that they tried to kill, and he said, "I want answers to this." The narrative didn't change. Why? Why? That's not a pro-Trump question. That's, that is a self-preservation question. If, if the government can see everything that you do and somehow missed all of this, what does that say about our FBI and our DOJ and our CIA? 'Cause they all would have been involved in this. I mean, they're either lying, they're incompetent, or they only monitor the people they want to monitor. None of these options should help us sleep at night.
Okay. The FBI and the mainstream media, MSNBC for sure, referenced leaks from Krooks' social media, the YouTube comments that showed he was pro-Trump and anti-immigration. We were also told that Krooks had almost no online social footprint, but he had Discord, Snapchat, very active YouTube. His YouTube comments in 2019, very violent, decapitating of government officials. And then something happened. He switches. Something's not right here. I think this iceberg is way beneath the waterline. I think this thing goes so deep. I'm not sure. I'm not sure that these. I have a friend who said to me, "I think the CIA is completely out of control." And this is a guy you would not know his name, and you wouldn't know his name for a reason, but he was very, very highly placed years ago. And this is the kind of stuff he did. And he said, "I don't think the CIA answers to anybody anymore." Um, I'm not sure that it's just the CIA. I'm not sure. It feels a little like you can shuffle the, the chairs on the deck of the Titanic, but it's the, it's what's below the waterline that really makes the difference on that ship.