Zero RB Strategy That Actually Works

The zero RB landscape has officially changed in 2026 fantasy football. Today, we're going to break down zero RB draft strategy that will actually work for you if you choose to use it in 2026.

Yeah, and the old zero running back draft strategy was always a reactionary strategy. It was zigging while your league mates were zagging. Running backs were pushed up the board, so you said, "Why would I take these sub-optimal running backs when I can stack up at the wide receiver position?" It entailed fading the running back position entirely in the first seven or eight rounds of your fantasy draft, especially focusing on other positions. Securing one of the top quarterbacks like a Lamar Jackson. Securing one of the top tight ends like a Travis Kelce. Stacking up the wide receiver. Being able to fill out your flex spots with strong wide receiver projections, especially if you're in, you know, full PPR, three wide receiver start type of leagues. You're hoping that you could be strong at the other positions and then utilize the waiver wire, utilize late-round handcuffs that hit in the rounds 10 to 13 portion to fill out your running back points in season. It was very logical. It was very optimal.

Unfortunately, now the market has caught up to these wide receiver values, so it's not like you're deciding between wide receiver four versus RB 13 in the second round. You're more so deciding between wide receiver seven and running back eight off the board in the middle of the second.

Yeah, and that's that's just a reality of the situation right now. Last year we talked about modifying the strategy, maybe venturing into the running back dead zone for the right profile. We'll kind of talk about how the ADP landscape has changed right now. So, getting running backs early over the last three seasons has mattered a lot when you look at the hit rates. In top 50 overall hit rates, so top 50 ADP meaning the first 50 picks, so the first four and a half rounds or so, 50.98% in the last three years in yellow have uh basically hit at the running back position. An average of 17 running backs off the board selected in this range. The reason that they're hitting at a higher rate is because less are going in that range and they're going more priced appropriately. In 2020 to 2022, 23.67 running backs selected in the top 50 picks. So, when you think about it this way, if you're getting the 17 best running back projections off the board in the first four rounds of your fantasy draft, instead of the 24 best running backs off the board in the first four rounds of your fantasy draft, it's simple math. No matter how deep you might think the running back position is, the best 17 projections are always going to have a higher hit rate most of the time than the best 24 projections of the running back position.

And conversely, these last few years we've seen at wide receiver an average of a 40.3% hit rate in the top 50. 22.3 wide receiver selected in this range on average, but it completely bottomed out in 2025, Corey. Of the 23 wide receivers being selected in the top 50, only six of them had above an 8.3% win rate. Therefore, on average, 26% of the time when you were drafting a receiver, you were actually picking a player that furthered your winning odds. It completely dropped off a cliff in 2025. We saw the wide receiver injuries at the top, like the CeeDee Lambs, like the Nico Collins. We saw the wide receiver position inherently fall compared to the running backs. And that was twofold again, given the recent years we were seeing more wide receivers go higher, and like 2015 in running back, it was kind of that way for wide receiver in 2025 in terms of just completely bottoming out.

Yeah, let's talk about the injury rates, actually. We can skip down to that. In 2025, the wide receiver position in the top 20 wide receivers of ADP, so the first three rounds or so, give or take, 4.1 games missed on average, a serious injury chance, so five or more games, a 35%. Like you said there, the only comparable season we've seen at running back or wide receiver to to numbers like that was the 2015 running back season. So, it's very clear that when you look at the average games missed in the other seasons over the last 10 years for wide receiver in the serious injury chance in the other seasons at wide receiver, it's very clear that we just saw an outlier season in 2025 with guys going down left, right, and center, whether it was Malik Nabers or Tyreek Hill or Terry McLaurin or some of the guys that missed significant time or guys that just had their seasons derailed by injuries like you said, like a CD Lamb or a Brian Thomas Jr. When you look at the bounce back that could be coming in 2026, last year being that major historical outlier, you can see exactly really the only good picks in the first couple rounds, JSN, Davante Adams, DK Metcalf, Amon-Ra St. Brown, Tutu Atwell, Kadarius Toney, the only receivers that were both a positive playoff rate above 50% and a positive win rate above 8.3%. a 21.74% hit rate in 2024 for comparison. That was 10 out of 25 or 40% in 2023, 11 out of 23 or 47%. So, when you compare that to the running back position, 58.82% in 2024 and 45% in 2025. So, it's no shocker that lately people are going double hero RB is the way, you have to draft your running backs early, when in the last 2 years the running backs have hammered the wide receivers in expected hit rate.

And it's just simple as a 35% injury chance, an average of 4.1 missed games, it's just simply unsustainable at wide receiver. And I think this is twofold, the fact that the top wide receivers got injured combined with just contextually in the NFL, more heavier sets, less wide receivers on the field. If there's going to be less relevant receivers and the top wide receivers are all getting banged up, you're going to look at the data and think, "Wow, wide receiver was really disappointing this year." Which is exactly the takeaway that a lot of people had from 2025. And it makes sense when you try to explain the dead zone data as well. If the running backs at the top are working out more, the wide receivers are working out less. Conversely, the dead zone wide receivers in 2025, 12 of 20 worked, 60% of them. Whereas conversely in the running back dead zone, we were at 28.57%. If you look at the last 3 years though, we see over 50% of the running backs are hitting in this range. About 55 and 45% of the wide receivers are hitting in this range in a non-catastrophe year at wide receiver. I think the main takeaway here is just simply that we're taking better profiles at running back in this range. We're not pushing up the Mike Davis's of the world because 23 running backs go in the first 30 picks. Instead, we're getting Trayveon Henderson. We're getting Brevail Toone. We're getting a lot of these guys that genuinely have legitimate RB1 upside. We're not just filling the quota. We're actually taking upside.

Yeah, cuz from 2015 to 2022, 46.82% of round 4 through 7 wide receivers hit. Just 34.88% of running backs hit. And in the last 3 years, like you made mention to, the running backs in the dead zone have produced a positive win rate about 45% of the time. So, when you're picking out guys that have pass-catching upside on good teams, good offenses, uh young running backs like, you know, you mentioned Trayveon Henderson, R.J. Harvey last year produced a positive win rate. Like, it's different than taking your Mike Davis's, your Miles Sanders on the Panthers of the world where they're older running backs signing with new teams, not a huge history of production. So, again, while running backs have definitely been better lately in the early rounds, specifically those, you know, first two to three rounds, they've really, really performed at a high level. The goal here is for us not to be history teachers. We don't want to tell you what we what's happened already because the point that you brought up, teams are shifting towards more 13 and 12 personnel. This could continue where the running backs continue to perform well. The question is are the receivers going to be as bad as they were last year? And I think we can both say definitively that they probably won't get injured at the rate that they got last year. And as long as you're picking receivers that are in, you know, two wide receiver sets, like outside wide receivers, that probably won't have as much of an impact on them, too.

Yeah, because we'll we'll talk about this more in depth when we go through the hero wide receiver video or the um hero running back videos, but I do inherently think being balanced at the top is the best case. And even though again, we'll go through the zero running back strategy, we'll talk about how to draft it optimally, I do think optimally this year you want access to the guys that can be a top six wide receiver while also still having an anchor running back cuz I do believe if the top of wide receiver stays healthy, the data from last year's going to be a moot point. Just like if we look at 2015 compared to 2016 at running back, it was a completely night and day situation.

Yeah, and the other thing that I think is worth noting is that this year there's 20 running backs in the top 50 of ADP. There's 25 wide receivers in the top 50 of ADP. If you're doing the math there, that only leaves five more spots for quarterback and tight end. So everybody has pretty much decided that this is the year to get your running backs and wide receivers early and fade quarterback and tight end. And in years past, let's say in 2017 you were doing your home league draft, the second the fourth tight end was off the board, the fifth tight end would come off the board pretty quickly after that. Then the sixth tight end is off the board. Then the seventh tight end. People aren't drafting like that anymore. People understand that there's a huge difference between Brock Bowers, Trey McBride, Colston Loveland, and you know, Tucker Kraft, Harold Fannin, and those guys that are going way later. So that's the other part at play here as well is that the wide receivers hitting at a 44% rate in 2018 and the running backs hitting at a 30.43% rate. A large part of it now too is that the better profiles are going in the top 50 and the dead zone is where you can maybe take that deviation for the quarterback or for the tight end after you've already drafted, let's say two, three running backs, two, three wide receivers.

Yeah, so like I said, before you race and go and take two running backs in the first two rounds because clearly running backs were the payoff last year, just contextualize that the market's valuing the wide receiver position off a catastrophically low year. If it just naturally regresses to the mean, wide receivers are going to do inherently better. And ultimately the takeaway after this year could be, "Wow, why were these elite wide receivers so mispriced? We were able to get CeeDee Lamb close to the back end of the first round. We were able to get Drake London in the back end of the second round. A.J. Brown back end of the second round. If all those guys are legitimate 18-plus point per game players, you're going to feel real silly for fading wide receiver a year from now.

Yeah, especially when you just look at like a guy like Nico Collins who a year ago was going exactly a round earlier than he's going right now and not much has changed really. Like it's the same situation. In fact, you know, maybe a situation has improved a little bit. So, and the very last thing I want to talk about here is league settings because zero RB is not viable. Let me repeat, it is not viable in regular ESPN leagues. It is only viable in leagues where you can start, let's say, three wide receivers, two flex, maybe there's a tight end premium, maybe there's a two quarterback or a super flex setting. Those are the only leagues where zero RB is actually going to be viable this year. So, for anybody playing in a one quarterback, two running back, two wide receiver, one flex, one tight end, half PPR league, zero RB is not for you. You should not be doing zero RB this year. But, Danny and I are going to enter a mock draft right now doing zero RBs from different areas of the board, me from early, you from kind of the middle of the board, and we're going to show you in these league settings where you can see on our draft sheets, you can customize our rankings based on the league settings you're in. Let's say you're in an ESPN league that has these types of settings. You should see our rankings change as a result of that. So, let's get right into those mock drafts here. All right, so we're into the mock. I'm picking from three, which of course is going to lend itself towards me taking a receiver in the first round. And you're picking from eight, which by your rankings is going to lend you towards taking a receiver in the first round as well. And again, we don't want to go into any draft, even despite the settings of this league being a three wide receiver, one flex, full PPR, with the intention of going into it doing a a zero RB. It's usually recommended to be a pivot strategy as we've covered in years past. But again, if the value falls to you, then you can definitely go in that direction. So again, my highest rated player is Ja'Marr Chase. He is going to be how I'm starting out my my draft. and again if if things fall to me then I'll go in that zero RB direction. If not, I might modify it a little bit.

Yeah, and I'm on the clock here at the 108. For a lot of people it might be Amon-Ra St. Brown. My highest ranked player is CD Lamb. I'll take him here, but like I said, if your highest ranked player is Amon-Ra St. Brown, take him here, too.

Yeah, and I I one thing I want to shout out quickly about our mock draft simulator, you can use it for free with the expert rankings. If you are a paid subscriber, you can get our season pass right now for 34 bucks. Covers you from now until the end of the year. You can get our specific rankings.

For sure. Now I'm back on the clock here. If I wanted to make a balanced team, I would take a Kenneth Walker pairing with CD Lamb, but I also think Drake London is a player that if you want to go with the full zero RB, is worthwhile of taking in this mid-second. We saw when he was healthy before the PCL sprain, over 19 points per game. Hoping to get back up to that level.

Yeah, and thankfully for the purposes of this video, it has lined up to me to the point that the highest rated player by many people would not be a running back. And not only that, it actually is a tight end in Bowers. So, I'm going to do what we would have usually told you to do in a zero RB back in the day, which is win your other positions. Win through the flex with high-end wide receivers and so on. So, what I'm going to do here, again for the purposes of this video, is take a start where I don't have a running back through three rounds. Ja'Marr Chase, Brock Bowers, DeVonta Smith. I am trying to win my other positions rather than running back. And again, given the settings of the mock draft that we're doing, it's a three wide receiver start. It's a full PPR. Zero RB is more viable in this than it would be in a standard or a half PPR two wide receiver setting.

For sure. And I'm back on the clock here. My highest ranked player is Dalton Kincaid. And knowing on the feature on the site that Zach also has him as one of the top three players on the board, I don't want to risk him not falling it back to me. So, I'm going to be taking Dalton Kincaid. Similar thought process to you. I have him valued in this range. Get a tight end advantage. I want to be strong at all positions if I'm going to be weak at running back.

Yeah, and the FL Toilet Bot I'm sure also has influence from your rankings as well. Definitely could have gone there as well.

For sure. Back on the clock here, my next highest rated receiver would be Ladd McConkey, and that's the direction we're going to go. You guys would have seen us talk more about him on yesterday's video.

Yeah, and if I sort by my own rankings again, again, if I was not trying to do a zero RB here, I could maybe take a running back, and in fact I am going to modify my zero RB I think a little bit just because again, this strategy is not actually viable if you're trying to do it. It's only viable if the board stacks up in a way that it ends up being best player available for you to do it. So, Davante Adams is one of my highest ranked players. I'm going to take Davante Adams here, but if a running back and one did fall to me that I still like in Quinshon Judkins, Breashaun Toilolo, De'Andre Swift, David Montgomery, I'm going to grab one of these guys as kind of like my first anchor running back, but it's very viable for me if I really wanted to to take Lamar Jackson here and have the advantage at quarterback or to take Romeo Doubs here and fill out my flex spot or whatever the case is. So, because I am running a zero RB that has, you know, shaky running backs and whatnot, I'm going to go with what I consider to be a pretty safer projection in De'Andre Swift who has PPR upside in a full PPR format, but he is my first like anchor running back here.

Yeah, and like you said, rationally should be your, you know, barometer for zero running back. If a Lamar Jackson fell back to me, Burden fell back to me, I would take them there. Should I do a modified or should I just stick true to the true zero RB nature?

Because I modified mine, maybe stick true to yours. I probably if we had went back in time, maybe I should have taken Lamar first and then you could have done the modified, but again, I think the way to do zero RB is not the same as it was years ago where we're always skipping over the dead zone round seven to eight. I think Swift is a good dead zone profile to go after because he's a pass catcher on a great offense.

Yep, makes total sense. I'm back on the clock here. Sorry, I'm just trying to find the board. My next highest rated non-running back would be Joe Burrow. So I think this is a worthwhile range for him. He's probably going to go higher in a home home la- in a home league draft setting. So I will take him here. Sticking true to the nature.

Yeah, and I'm glad this player fell to me because he does fit my build better. I have Devonta Smith on my team. I'm running kind of a modified zero RB. I don't have a running back really worthwhile in this range. Again, if I was really going to force things, I suppose I could chase a volume guy like a Pollard or a a Chuba Hubbard, but I have his number one receiver. A rushing quarterback is always like Ryan Heath put out a tweet about the most predictive stats for why for quarterbacks and other than like previous years fantasy points per game, eight of the first 10 most predictive stats for quarterbacks are rushing related. So Jalen Hurts being the rusher that he is, I expect him to regress positively back to his mean rushing production for his career. Rushed for 421 rushing yards and eight touchdowns last year. His mean is about 650 and 12 touchdowns on the ground. So I do think he'll be a much better rusher this season and I'm going to grab Michael Pittman Jr. as my next player and he would technically be my flex in this situation. As we talked about in previous years with zero RB, you do want to try and win the flex, have a better flex position than most of your other league mates. I was hoping that Tyson or Lemon would fall to me and they did not.

Yeah, I was hoping that I was able to get Jaylen Warren here. Again, like we mentioned, faded wide or faded running back in the first six rounds. I think this would be the range to start filling it out considering that all my starters are basically set otherwise. Uh Tony Pollard should figure into a good early season role and I think in the late seventh round pretty decent cost on him there. Next player I'm going to be taking here. Unfortunately again that I have tight end and quarterback overall filled. And that is one of the negatives I would say this year with zero running back is that there are just such good quarterback and tight end projections at this point that having both of them selected on your team kind of leaves you restricted from a pure flexibility perspective. So, my next highest rated running back here in terms of filling my what I need would be JK Dobbins. So, I'll take him here.

Yeah, and I'm glad you brought up that point because part of the reason why zero RB was more effective, let's say 2022 to 2020, was because the quarterback advantages that you were getting were bigger. The tight end advantages that you were getting were bigger. This year we feel pretty good about some late round quarterbacks and tight ends to the point that it makes that strategy less viable. So, I'm going to grab a volume play at the running back position because I do, you know, not see a massive outlier at wide receiver that I could take. I could have taken Josh Downs, but I figured he might fall back to me and he does. Aaron Jones is a guy that I think in a zero RB situation where I have Swift and Aaron Jones as my my starting running backs, I'm intending to win every other position by having Hurts, by having Bowers, by having the three receiver set that I have. So, I'm okay taking Aaron Jones to just give me some early season volume. And then after I take Josh Downs here to help make sure that my flex is always a really good position for me, I can take some late round running back dart throws in case Aaron Jones by week five is no longer viable in my starting lineup.

For sure. I'm on the clock here again at the 908 and I guess a point that we forgot to mention, but if you're going to be drafting a zero running back, you should kind of fill out the types of running backs you drafted. First two I drafted were Tony Pollard and JK Dobbins, easy early season type of projections. Now I swing for upside with Jonathan Brooks. I do think that having guys you can depend on early while also giving a guy like Jonathan Brooks who has the elite ceiling potentially time to mature is the way to approach it. I would have loved a guy like Blake Corum falling back. Another guy that I really like this year is Jordan Mason. Touched on potential role in that Vikings offense, a team that we think is going to bounce back. And I just think in terms of the profile, Aaron Jones space back, Jordan Mason type of the goal line guy there.

Yeah, I kind of wish I had taken Jonathan Brooks where I took Josh Downs. I didn't realize he was on the board cuz he's kind of buried in ADP, but I will I'll take Chris Rodriguez here. I think that generally I'm of the opinion that Keisha Tuten will be the starting running back of that team, but there has been some positive buzz on Chris Rodriguez assuming his health is okay. And again, you said kind of vary up your your running back styles. I have three guys that I can kind of depend on early season. So now it's time for me to start taking some upside swings. I'm going to grab Isaiah Pacheco with one of these here because Isaiah Pacheco is an upside swing in my mind, whereas if Jamir Gibbs let's say by week 5 6 7 8 something like that were to start dealing with some injuries knock on wood. Isaiah Pacheco would work into a very big workload there. So I'm going to as we talked about in years past line your bench with some upside hammers there.

Yeah, um I'm back in the 11th. I think given the detours I've taken in the last five rounds taking a depth receiver would be fine here. Especially knowing it's a full PPR three wide receiver starting the setting. Getting Rashid Shaheed maybe Carnell Tate starts slow and then all of a sudden I can plug Shaheed into my lineup.

Yeah, I probably would have taken a detour a little earlier than that. I I probably would have taken Romeo over Mason in the previous round, but I think that makes sense, too.

Uh for sure. Um now I might just go back to the running back well. Again, we've talked about um having implied upside handcuffs at this point. Saquon Barkley's another running back. Tank Bigsby was efficient last year and I think just in terms of the makeup of my team, Pollard Dobbins early season work, Brooks Mason maybe working into full-fledged workloads. Bigsby if Saquon were to go down would be a top 12 weekly running back.

Yeah, that makes sense. I'll I'll roll with Sean Tucker here who I think could have a role in the Buccaneers backfield if Bucky Irving re-aggravates his shoulder. I think he Like I I love Kenneth Gainwell. I think he's going to be a good piece of our offense, but I think that Tucker would actually carry the ball more should Bucky Irving miss time. And now because I have let's call it two to three early season reliable guys and a couple upside swings. Now it's time to swing for guys that I will cut after the first three weeks if they don't work out and that'll be Nick Singleton here who easily could be a complete zero, but in the 13th round of a managed redraft league if he's nothing in the first couple weeks, I can just cut bait with him. And again, as we've talked about in years past, your priority when you run a zero RB on the waiver wire is finding running backs. So, the second a running back pops up, you're going to be uh one of the highest FAB bidders on them.

Yeah. Might just be $92 on Bijan too. Um you uh took one of the Penn State alums, I'll take the other one here. Uh very similar type of thought process there. Uh ambiguous backfield, two veterans working ahead of him, but like the rookie's upside at this spot. Back on the clock here, we do see kind of a tight end and quarterback run go. I think Brian Robinson is also a very good handcuff cuz we saw kind of what the Tyler Allgeier role's been. We've kind of hypothesized in the past that if Bijan were to go down, Allgeier would be a league winner. And I do think Brian Robinson has at least showed to be a competent NFL running back.

Yep. And uh do I uh bookend the auction here with Alvin Kamara? I think I might. [laughter] I mean, I don't think he actually really fits though. Like I have a bunch of early season guys. Let me get a a straight upside swing here in uh Emari Demercado. Uh I'm not very high on Kenneth Walker this year. I think the second running back on the Chiefs will have a role, and if Walker were to go down, Emari Demercado's one of the few guys that has experience carrying an early down workload in that backfield. So, um this is how the draft ended up if we sort by, you know, my rankings at first, you can see that I rank a lot higher in them. Um one thing I want to just quickly say because you and I both agree that zero RB is not an optimal draft strategy this year. So, if any onks in the chat right now in the comments are going to go, this team looks like I would never draft a team like this. You're probably right. I don't think this year is optimal to go zero RB. But, let me paint the picture of how it would work out for me if I had a team like this. Hurts, quarterback advantage, rushes back 12-plus touchdowns on the ground, has 22 fantasy points per game. Brock Bowers is the guy you need at tight end. He ends up having 18 fantasy points per game. Chase, Smith, Adams, Pittman, and Downs, between those four guys or those five guys, I have an advantage in my three wide receiver spots and in my one flex. And let's say early on in the season, Swift and Aaron Jones produce like RB2s for me. As the season goes along, Jahmyr Gibbs starts to get banged up. I get a couple good weeks out of Pacheco. Sean Tucker works into my lineup later on in the season. Nick Singleton breaks out. Maybe on the waiver wire I pick up the name that you had to have early on in the season and I'm able to get by at running back while my opponents who drafted a lot of running backs teams are getting worse, my team is getting better at the running back position.

Um and so if I my rankings real quick cuz I'll talk about it on my lens as well. Um funny enough by the way, the FFE bot comes out ahead and they kind of did just like a better version of our draft cuz they have a Breece Hall. Obviously, you know, running back >> kind of a hero RB more so than a zero, but definitely should have more running backs for sure.

But that's what I mean. So we'll go to my team real quick. Again, very simple. 10th ranked running back core, I'm assuming that's just because myself, you, and one other team was doing a full-fledged zero running back cuz otherwise that running back core is pretty desolate, but you mentioned painting the picture. Cole Kmet and Loveland, clear number one option >> from the Bears, 18 point per game type of player in year two, got there mentally. Uh quarterback, Joe Burrow. We've seen kind of like him and Dak flip between who's like the top three to five quarterback every year. This is Joe Burrow's turn and he's all of a sudden throwing 45 touchdowns and 4,500 yards. Wide receiver, CeeDee Lamb, bounce back year. Drake London, continues what he's doing prior to the injury. Ladd McConkey, we love Mike McDaniel. He he injects that first year Ladd McConkey into that Tyreek Hill, Jaylen Waddle type of role. Carnell Tate, guy I'm >> I'm extremely high on. I think he can assume 130-plus targets even in his rookie year. And then rounding out the core with a guy like Rashid Shaheed who's going to run routes on a good offense and we know can stretch the field vertically. Like I think obviously when you're spending so many resources at receiver, your receiver core is going to look very optimal, but I think this is about as optimal of a receiver core as you can create.

Yeah, and I think if you just go back in in last year's ADP and said zero RB wouldn't have worked last year. It's like, well, if you picked the right guys, it would have. If you had drafted Kuka Nakua in the first round and you had drafted Drake London in the second round and you drafted Jackson Smith-Njigba in the third round and you took a tight end advantage at some point, a quarterback advantage in round four with Josh Allen or something, you could have actually won your league with a zero RB. It's just that it wasn't optimal based on the hit rates as we went through it. So, you kind of need to walk the tightrope of picking the right quarterback, tight end, wide receivers in the early rounds, which is why we don't think that the that the zero RB strategy is as valuable this year as it's been in years past is because it's it's ambiguous who's going to be the quarterback advantages, who's going to be the tight end advantages because there's a lot more depth at those positions than there has been traditionally. And also, too, you need to draft a wide receiver one in every one of your wide receiver and flex spots to be able to really pay that off from a receiver standpoint. So, unless you're getting obscene values in your draft, the zero RB draft strategy is probably not the best way to win your league. But, if you have it in as a tool in your tool belt, if you need to pull it out, you can pull it out. And it is possible to work, but again, only do it if you're in a league that is a three wide receiver start, full PPR, maybe two-plus flexes, maybe a super flex, maybe a tight end premium. You don't want to pull it out in a league that is an ESPN half PPR, two flex, or two a one flex, two wide receiver, two running back. It's just not going to work in that format. And we're also going to rank all the strategies. And spoiler alert, zero RB is not going to rank very high on that list. So, that is something that we'll talk about next week once we get through all the strategy videos. Stay tuned for hero RB, double hero RB, hero wide receiver, robust RB we're going to talk about this year. So, definitely stay tuned for all of that. We'll cover it over the next calendar week or so. If you enjoyed this video, leave a like down below. Subscribe to the channel if you guys are new around here. We're on the road to 100,000. We're trying to get to it by about Christmas time if we can. So, if you're watching this video and you're not subscribed, go ahead and do that. And of course, if you want our draft guides, both redraft and dynasty are available for free when you sign up on Underdog with promo code FSE and make your first deposit and play. Within 24 hours, you'll have access to that. Or you can get everything on flockfantasy.com using the season pass. $34 will cover you from now until the end of the calendar year. Both of those things are linked down below in the pin comment and in the description. But with that being said, peace out. We'll talk to you soon.