Transcription
Picture this, if you will. You're about to send a text message. You read it for one final check and you notice something's off. It sounds a bit too eager, so you rewrite it. But well, now it feels forced. So you try a few more times and before you know it, it's been over an hour and your text is still unscent.
This is what it's like living with a high level of self-awareness. We are told that being self-aware is necessary to live a life of authenticity. Yet the more you know about yourself, the less about yourself, you realize you know.
In the words of ancient Chinese philosopher Xi, "Once I dreamt I was a butterfly fluttering here and there. Suddenly I woke up and I was Xi again. But I don't know. Am I Shwangj Xi who dreamt I was a butterfly or a butterfly dreaming I'm Schwang Xi?" This is the terrifying paradox of self-awareness. The moment we begin to ask, "Who am I really?" We split into two. In that instant, we become two different people. The one who asks and the one who's being questioned. And if finding yourself requires watching yourself, are you really discovering who you are? Or are you performing for an audience of one?
In quantum mechanics, observing a particle changes its behavior. So, a photon is normally in superposition, meaning that it appears to be in both point A and point B at once. However, once you observe it, it collapses into a single position of either A or B. As an oversimplification, you could say that the photon doesn't want to stay in one measurable state. Superposition is more or less its normal way of being.
The same thing happens with human consciousness. In our default state, we exist in superposition both as the observer and the person. But the moment you become self-aware, you effectively split into two people. One is the actor, aka the one being observed, while the other is the critic, or the one doing the observing. Therein lies the paradox. Self-awareness indirectly feels like a performance between an actor and critic and less like a whole person reflecting naturally. It happens so unexpectedly that you don't fully acknowledge when your mind is in this mode.
Have you ever had a moment where the music just, it hits just right, you know, and your body responds to the beat and suddenly, all by yourself, you're just enjoying a spontaneous experience that you weren't looking for? And then it happens. Physically, you're still the only one in the room, but mentally, as soon as you lock eyes with yourself in the mirror, the critic lets itself in. You become self-conscious and start wishing that you danced a little better. You, you had more rhythm. You looked more graceful. You remember the last time you watched someone hit those moves and how much better they looked. You wonder when you'll be able to dance that well and slowly you lose the beat. Your movements become stiff with self-doubt. The critic takes over completely and you stop dancing.
With self-awareness, you can't have everything all together at once. You can either know what you're doing or why you are doing it. But observing one changes the other. The you who acts naturally and the you who understands yourself cannot exist simultaneously. They can come close enough in terms of when either version of you pops out, but they cannot be together at the exact same time.
Picture yourself on a date. You finally found someone with a sense of humor where you don't need to constantly hold yourself back or, or filter your words. Instead, conversations feel natural as words spill out of your mouth. The moment you think to yourself, "Well, hey, this is going well," you're suddenly thrown into performance mode. As you begin to poke at your behavior to understand what's making the date so good, you may lose grasp of the part of yourself that was just being you. After a while, you might start to wonder what gives.
Here's the unspoken part. You know how we mentioned the actor and the critic? Well, the truth is, while these roles feel necessary within your psyche, neither of them are your authentic self. Self-awareness doesn't even highlight an authentic self to begin with. Instead, it creates a new observed self that is fundamentally different from your authentic self.
What is memory? By default, we picture memory as recollections of past events. But neuroscience has a tiny, yet redefining caveat to what we call our memories. You see, every time you recall a memory, you're not just accessing a file, you're rewriting it. The act of remembering can and often does change the memory. Scientists call it memory reconsolidation. So the past, as we know it, something set in stone, well, in reality, it's always being slightly modified to fit the current narrative that we tell ourselves about the world.
Researchers at the University of Texas actually tried to observe this effect. And what they found is that we have a malleable window, which is essentially a few hours where a recalled memory is vulnerable to being updated, strengthened, or even distorted by your current emotions or your environment.
Here's what that means for your self-awareness. You know how self-help encourages you to confront past memories to understand them better? Well, that's a good thing. But sometimes when you analyze your past to understand yourself, you're not actually discovering who you were. Instead, you're only creating a narrative that overwrites your original experience. And this effect can be especially dangerous in our current era where therapy speak is more popular than ever. Today, many people assign clinical terms to events that they never truly experienced as traumatic. But because of the present story they tell themselves about that event, they unknowingly adjust those memories to fit into the boxes of trauma, which then affects what they believe about themselves.
Take a moment and think about your first heartbreak. Back then, all you likely knew was that it really hurt to lose someone you thought you were going to spend the rest of your life with. However, as time passes, you learn more about relationships and how they work psychologically. With new knowledge on attachment theory, you give the memories of your first heartbreak another go. This time through the lens of what attachment styles each person had. Now you've learned that she was likely avoidant while you were anxious. So your anxious attempts to get closer to her ended up pushing her away due to her fear of eventually being abandoned. And all of it suddenly feels resolved.
Now months down the line, you learn about feminism. Not just the definition, but its real meaning. You embrace it in a way that has you acknowledging its impact across various aspects of society. It feels revealing to uncover just how important it is for women to actually have a proper say in the way their life plays out. So then you revisit the memory of your first heartbreak. This time the feminism lens uncovers something that you never really understood before. At the time, you were more focused on keeping the relationship alive. So, you downplayed her interest in a study abroad program, believing that it wasn't worth the distance. Well, now you've learned that you might have been tying her down, and that could also work as a reason for the breakup.
The problem is the fact that your past self didn't have your present self's awareness. You're inevitably studying someone who doesn't exist anymore, using tools that they didn't have at the time. You were only reacting with the understanding that you had. Later, a more wise version of you steps in and rewrites the meaning. You lose touch with what losing your first love felt like, and exchanging it with a new meaning. Now, but pain, grief, or fear isn't something that should be constantly assigned with specific responses. Your first heartbreak doesn't need to find its reason in attachment styles or a younger version of you being anti-feminist. Instead, you took that loss for reasons you may never truly understand. It's entirely possible that she found someone else or her parents disapproved of the relationship or any other reason another human being can have behind their own decisions. You don't need to justify your pain with labels.
Self-awareness feels a lot like a hall of mirrors. At first, life is just feeling like something is missing. But as you get into self-awareness, new mirrors start to appear in your mind. Initially, these mirrors allow you to see yourself more clearly and from a variety of angles. However, the intention was always to move past the mirrors to get to the other side. Here's the twist, though. Once your mind is in too deep with self-awareness, you find yourself thrown into a loop of infinite mirrors, and the exit doesn't seem to move any closer to you.
At level one of this self-awareness loop, you make the first realization that says, "Oh, I'm anxious." Level two then introduces the inner actor that asks, "Well, okay, why am I anxious?" The inner critic then responds, "Well, I'm analyzing my anxiety and I'll figure that out." Level three then emerges and you ask yourself again, "Wait, am I making my anxiety worse by analyzing it?" And you reflect on that for a while and then you realize that now you're overthinking. However, you've already caught yourself in the loop, so you can't pull back now. Level four is when your mind doubles down even further, saying, "Okay, I'm overthinking, but am I overthinking? My overthinking." And then level five hits, and that's when it gets even more absurd, and you finally spiral. Well, now I'm overthinking about my overthinking about my overthinking, and so on.
This is what the authenticity spiral looks like. In this mode, you endlessly shift between thoughts about every little aspect of your behavior. Everything you do feels performative, and nothing ever feels authentic. Any attempt to pull away and act normal only loudly gets criticized by the inner critic who calls other aspects of yourself an actor.
With meditation, it gets paradoxical. You sit down to observe your thoughts. But who's observing those thoughts? Now, instead of meditating, you're thinking about watching your thoughts about watching your thoughts. Well, what about journaling? Initially, you say that you're going to write to process your feelings, but you inevitably start writing for a future version of yourself who will read this journal. So, so you're no longer processing those feelings, but instead you're curating them for a future observer.
The cruel irony of all of this is that the people who are most committed to self-awareness usually become the biggest victims of its darker consequences. They never actually get to enjoy any direct experiences because they are always at least one level away from being a single person with a single mind.
Think about the most charismatic person you knew growing up. And I don't mean the one that aligned with your values. I, I mean the one that always seemed to get away with everything. If you're the type who grew up a quiet kid, the person that comes to mind is probably someone you didn't get along with very much. Perhaps they'd crack jokes loudly while the teacher was trying to move a lesson along. Or they'd managed to ease their way out of trouble just by being funny. Somehow it doesn't feel like they were particularly efficient at anything. Yet, their personality always got them by in life. Meanwhile, you felt like you had to work twice as hard only to get a pat on the back.
People with zero self-awareness appear more confident, authentic, and charismatic for one reason only. They are not watching themselves. That way, they always seem to go according to life's tempo, no matter the situation. Spontaneity isn't just a quirky personality trait. Sometimes it could mean the difference between a fulfilling life and one that never truly feels satisfying. When you're constantly monitoring everything and never going with the flow, you get tired of your own mind's constant spirals. You're like an animal on a leash, only that you're also the one holding that leash.
You might have heard of the Dunning-Kruger effect. It's that thing where people with limited knowledge or competence in a domain overestimate their abilities without realizing that they were never that good in the first place. Lots of incompetent people think they are competent, and sometimes that actually helps. Just the conviction of knowing what you're doing can take you quite far in life. But there is a flip side to the Dunning-Kruger effect, and that's when competent people become paralyzed by the awareness of their own limitations. And that is the subtle way that self-awareness slows you down.
First you feel something and instead of acting, you analyze that feeling. After that, you decide whether or not what you're feeling is appropriate and then you finally, finally choose a response. Depending on what you were thinking about, you could go from a few minutes to make a choice to a few decades. Yeah, I'm not kidding on that one. There are people out there who simply acted on seemingly absurd thoughts and that got them to where they wanted to be in life almost instantly. Meanwhile, there are others who felt like what would seem too absurd to take action. So, they spent decades in regret only to realize many years later that they could have made a move.
Imagine you're at a networking event and you're watching a brilliant presentation by a keynote speaker when you're struck by a crazy thought. "I have experience with this exact thing and I should just go and introduce myself." Well, you freeze and you begin to craft the ideal introduction, expecting the right moment to align for the speaker to be alone. The presentation is over now and the speaker is swarmed by tons of people. You decide that it's not worth the stress and so you move on.
Meanwhile, at that same presentation, someone else in the audience thinks it'll be cool if they could connect with the speaker, too. In order to leave an impression, they don't think twice, and they clumsily ask a question. The speaker answers, asks for their name, and thanks them for the question. In your head, you're thinking, "Well, that was a dumb question." And while, yes, you might be right about that. This other person's interaction meant that when they go on to introduce themselves to the speaker after they talk, they can recognize them and then they exchange contact information.
Now, life isn't always going to play out in these ideal ways just because you're confident. Truthfully, it's possible for the speaker to simply roll their eyes and ignore the person's question. The paradox is this. Life is a lot like a dance performance. A person free from self-surveillance may stumble, but they keep moving to life's tempo. Meanwhile, the hyperaware person who obsessively plans each step will often find that the music is stopped by the time that they've decided to dance.
Something strange happens when you're too busy naming everything you encounter, viewing life through a lens, and never experiencing life with your own naked eyes. Soon enough, you'll only give yourself permission to exist when there's an appropriate label for every action or inaction. Your journey into self-awareness might have begun because you constantly felt uncomfortable, but you never quite understood what it meant. Then you learned about anxiety, studied how it manifests, and now you've realized that it's a core part of your struggle. But instead of growing beyond anxiety's limitations, you use it as a crutch. Because you identify as someone with anxiety, every nervous feeling confirms that narrative for you. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy that's hard to spot and even harder to break away from.
As humans, we crave a coherent narrative for our lives. So, attaching a label helps create a consistent story that you can tell yourself. This story begins to leak into aspects of your life that you never could have imagined. When you get invited to social events you might have enjoyed, you decide to skip them entirely because you believe the umbrella term of anxiety exempts you from ever appreciating anything outside. It's not just with anxiety that this happens. You could even associate your identity with trauma. While that makes for a valid reason for life to slow down, there are people who never truly manage to move past the role of a trauma survivor. Tragically, their pain becomes their entire persona, and that could alienate them from people and places, further reinforcing the impacts of their trauma.
Sometimes, moments that may have opened up your mind to new experiences get abandoned because of narratives in your head. Uh, let's, okay, for instance, say you've failed at math a few too many times in high school. Now that you're older, you decide that you're not a math person. So, you stop trying and you completely close your mind off from the different branches of math that exist where there could have been a few things that you might have actually enjoyed.
The problem with subscribing to the idea of a single permanent narrative is that humans are a highly fluid group. Who you were a year ago can greatly differ from who you are today at this very moment. Likewise, who you were at college differs from who you are in the workforce. Carrying ideas of your identity from self-awareness alone into the life you're attempting to create only holds you back. If your identity is resistant to change, you might be too attached to the self you know, preventing you from engaging with the unknown.
Self-awareness does this thing where you feel really good that you're learning new things. It overloads you with information about how your mind works, what triggers it, and how you can solve your problems. But it's a lot like learning stuff online. With all the resources and tutorials available, you get so distracted by the fancy theory and lessons available that when the time to put in actual work comes, you defer it with claims that you're just trying to find the perfect tutorial, a magical answer that can solve all of your problems and give you the skills that you're searching for.
The hard truth that self-awareness hides from us is this. Some people would rather stay miserable in a story that makes sense to them than be happy in a way that contradicts what they believe to be true about themselves. Instead of a path towards a better life, they end up finding the perfect excuse for never moving forward. So with that in mind, here's an uncomfortable question to ask yourself. Who benefits from your self-awareness?
When you're up at 3:00 a.m. replaying conversations, correcting your appearance, and beating yourself up for not fitting in, someone out there is smiling. And I'm going to take a guess that that person isn't you. Living in a capitalistic system, there is no denying that your self-consciousness is a huge source of income to advertisers. If you spend any significant amount of time on the internet, you must have seen that advertisers are spending tons of money to constantly remind you of your shortcomings. Your face, well, it's not pretty enough. Buy this new makeup kit, though. That'll help. Your 3-year-old car is too old and rickety. Spend half your income paying this outrageous monthly car payment. Move out of your parents' house straight into a fancy luxury apartment. You're constantly being sold solutions to artificial problems. So, of course, you feel inadequate when you're not able to match a bunch of people that buy into the game of capitalism.
Today, the self-improvement industry doesn't just sell anti-aging cream. It sells you something even harder to commodify, and that is your own potential. Coaching courses, blueprints, consulting frameworks to model your personality around. They all promise to deliver the best version of you, a you that finally feels whole. But that version of you can never exist if you don't learn to accept yourself as a person and not just as a concept of a person. Obscuring your own emotions with fancy terms does not help you grow any faster than someone with zero self-awareness. It only makes you feel better mentally but not emotionally.
When the self-improvement industry tries to make you perpetually aware of your inadequacy, they do that because they know that satisfaction would be bad for business. Environments are designed to nudge you towards certain types of decisions. You're not anxious because you're self-aware. No, it's not that simple. You're self-aware because anxiety is profitable. The default state of inadequacy is a part of choice architecture. Everyone feels it in one way or another. You'll rarely find a truly satisfied person in our digital age.
Problem to solution pipelines exist for the strangest things when you think about it critically. The process of self-improvement is ridiculously gamified nowadays. And, and don't get me wrong, to-do apps and journaling apps are great, but does your mental health really demand a monthly subscription for you to love yourself more? Really? Is the answer to your struggles growing a paid journaling app's digital pet on your screen? And, and sure, look, it, it sounds harsh for me to point this out, especially since it actually does help some people out, but the truth is that our environments created these problems in the first place, and then they turn around to sell expensive solutions to us.
And all of this, everything that I've said so far, none of this means that self-awareness is bad or that growth is impossible. It just means that we need to be a lot more careful about the content that we consume on our journey towards improvement. So perhaps the first truly self-aware action to take isn't to analyze yourself more deeply, but rather it's to recognize who benefits from your analysis. Once you realize that, you can choose to refuse the transaction.
That realization isn't something completely new. In fact, history shows that ideas of the self vary across cultures. In some places, the self is merely a distraction not worth pursuing. When we think of Western civilization and her ideals, the earliest philosophers often come to mind. Figures like Socrates have played no small part in shaping society's core ideas. He promoted the belief that there is a real you buried somewhere underneath everything that the world assumes. And your job is to find it, to know yourself, and to be authentic. Was he right? Is our goal in life to know thyself and uncover our truth? If so, did our world evolve from this mentality? After all, therapy is not exactly new, and the people that shaped it were not perfect. Sigman Freud is often credited as the father of psychoanalysis and a key figure that helped in shaping modern clinical psychology. And yet he's the same person that introduced the concept of penis envy in young girls. Meanwhile, Socrates, in all his wisdom, claimed to have a link to the divine which guided him as a private inner voice that no one else could hear.
Now, it might seem odd for me to point these things out about Western philosophy's biggest icons, but it does reveal a crack in our understanding. Western therapy developed itself from a place that says "find yourself" from people who never quite had a final answer for what a self even meant. None of this means that Western philosophy is worthless, but it does raise some questions. What if the idea of finding yourself is built on an assumption that isn't, in fact, universal?
Eastern philosophy started from a different place. Therefore, it may hold the potential answers to issues that exist with self-awareness. So the big reveal with Eastern philosophy is nothing. The self is an illusion and should be dissolved. In Buddhism, this concept is called anatta, or no-self. It doesn't mean you don't exist. You do. But rather, Eastern philosophy doesn't pressure you to search harder, nor does it worry that you haven't found your authentic self yet. Instead, it presents a different way of thinking. One that rejects the idea of a permanent, unchanging you. You're not a statue waiting to be uncovered. Uh, you're more like a river, different from moment to moment, but possessing one name.
This, in turn, reframes everything that we think we know. The West's search for meaning is much harder to justify today. Even mindfulness from the East has been rebranded into something that helps in our search for the self. Because of that, it's become a billion-dollar industry. Meanwhile, the version of mindfulness taught in Buddhism and other Eastern practices is not about how it leads to more material wealth. That's not why meditation is encouraged. The real purpose of meditating is not to create a calmer self. It's to realize that there is no self to calm. We are one with everyone and everything around us, a part of some greater whole. Yet, we turned a liberation practice into a tool for self-improvement.
The Daoist philosopher Zhuangzi takes us even further. He didn't just point out that the self is an illusion. He actually said that the search for truth can become another cage. Pondering on whether he only dreamed he was a butterfly or if he's a butterfly dreaming he's makes for a hilarious yet deep thought. You see, Zhuangzi himself didn't have an answer to this dream, and that was the point. Western philosophy demands it. It screams for certainty. But Buddhism offers liberation through insight. Zhuangzi's answer is a shrug. Not an arrogant or a dismissive shrug, but a relieving one. He invites us to see that our desperation to cling to an idea of who you really are is simply another form of attachment. The self isn't solid, so trying to search for it is futile.
Memory corruption, our performance of privacy. These aren't universal problems. Instead, they are symptoms of a culture that believes in a solid, findable self. If you don't believe in that concept to begin with, well, you won't feel as lost constantly. And yeah, it's, it's humbling to accept this idea, especially when you're so attached to all that you already are and the idea of who you could be. But the truth is, if you're both the dreamer and the butterfly, well, why bother thinking about which one is the real you?
Forgetting. Now, I'm not saying you should forget everything you know and go become a Buddhist. There is a value in both Western and Eastern philosophies. The real issue with self-awareness is that when it's all you ever think about, it becomes paradoxical. Observation changes what is being observed. And therefore, you never truly get anything you were searching for in the first place.
The truly terrifying aspect of self-awareness is this. The only way to find yourself is to lose yourself. So, what we're saying is take risks. Act and learn to live without the constant narration or self-criticism because the real you isn't the person you see in your reflection. It's the one dancing to the beat of life's drums when you forget to look.
If you want to get better at being yourself without the constant self-criticism, one thing that I can't recommend enough is taking learning seriously. When you're consistently upgrading your thinking and expanding your knowledge, you build a quiet confidence. There's a real sense of progress that makes you feel good about who you're becoming. And beyond that, the skills and insights that you pick up can genuinely change your life for the better. That's why I love Brilliant, the sponsor of today's episode. Brilliant makes learning such a rewarding experience because you learn through active problem-solving, which means you instantly know how the ideas you're learning can actually be used in the real world. It's also a much better way to learn than passive lectures because you're constantly engaging with the concepts, which makes them stick more. Beyond the interactive lessons, Brilliant also personalizes your learning. It starts you at the right level based on what you already know and then lets you progress at your own pace. It also encourages you to keep that progress going through fun and motivating challenges. I used to think I wasn't a math person, but Brilliant completely changed that for me. It made me realize that most people aren't actually bad at math. They were just taught poorly. I've had countless aha moments that finally unlocked concepts that I've been struggling with for years. And it's not just with math. Brilliant also covers computer science, logic, and even AI, breaking down complex ideas into something surprisingly intuitive. I know most of us had New Year's resolutions to do more self-improvement this year. So, if you've been struggling or if you've ever fallen off that wagon, then Brilliant is what you need to get yourself back on track. It also makes a great gift for younger siblings and relatives who are already glued to their phones anyway. It's designed for ages 10 to 110, so it's great for everyone. Instead of mindless scrolling, Brilliant gives them something challenging, interactive, and genuinely educational to do with their phones. To learn for free on Brilliant for a full 30 days, go to brilliant.org/apperture. Scan the QR code on the screen or click the link in the description. You also get 20% off an annual premium subscription which gives you unlimited daily access to everything on Brilliant.