🔴 BUKTI Quran Tulisan Allah, Bible Karangan Manusia?

Hello friends, joining again with Andre Tunggal, and this time we will discuss together a topic that I have displayed as it appears in your thumbnails. Yes, this time we will discuss the evidence of the Quran being the writing of Allah and the Bible, which is said to be human creation. Of course, as you know this person is Donitan, and we will discuss together the claims made by Donitan. In this video, I have intentionally taken excerpts from "Kasih Solusi." So, a channel that I think perhaps many of you know, "Kasih Solusi." Well, in this video, we will see Donitan's arguments stating that in this matter, the Quran is proven to be the writing of Allah, and the Christian Bible is human creation. Here are Donitan's comments, roughly. Let's watch, friends. The people who wrote in the PB, especially the four gospels, were not people who knew Jesus directly, not people who knew those who knew Jesus directly. No. But why did the attacks happen, slander happen, and so on, he cooked it up saying that Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, this Muhammad is a deceiver. Muhammad is a fabricator. So the Quran is Muhammad's fabrication. If such an accusation is made now, it's too late. They accused him even when the Prophet was alive. Yes. Yes. Yes. So later it will be said that it is the fabrication of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, and even Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, is accused of being helped by the devil. There are such things. All of that can be easily refuted. How can a prophet who cannot read or write talk about mountains being pegs, seas not mixing, fire within the sea, water in the sea being separable, some fresh, some salty, stars knocking, the Big Bang theory from the Quran. In the beginning, We made the heavens and the earth one mass, then We separated them. From where? Hey, this is so scientific. Come on, you can do it, just use your brains, Bang Deri. Come on, you can. You just saw or heard and witnessed Donitan's arguments. And I think, once again, everyone is free to argue, free to make claims. But the problem is whether those arguments or claims are proven and verifiable. That's the problem. Well, of course, as someone whose scripture has been touched by Donitan, I think it's good for us to provide an answer, but also to give a response and commentary on their claims. Well, of course, friends, we will discuss this after the following. [Music] Okay, thank you to all the friends who have joined this time, friends in the live chat that is streaming right now. And thank you to all the friends who have joined. Thank you once again for all your support. Thank you because there are about 200 people who have joined together in tonight's streaming, friends. Well, friends, allow me before we continue further, friends, allow me to create a table of contents first because I want to anticipate that perhaps some of you watching this video are not watching live, but later. So you have the opportunity to speed up the video. Because, well, of course, I want to ask for your understanding that I have to greet some other friends first. But I will go into the table of contents first to provide some kind of education to people. In this regard, I will start with a disclaimer first. How people who support Donitan's efforts and so on. These are people who perhaps feel that Christians are stubborn. If Muslims show the straight path or show the truth, why are Christians so stubborn? Well, we will explain that because that is one of the comments from one of our friends who diligently follows my YouTube. Well, second, I will show you Donitan's arguments. There is one argument that you might have noticed in the video at the beginning about the accusation, once again, there is an accusation that Prophet Muhammad collaborated with the devil. That is an accusation. That accusation, once again, is not from now or at this time. Don't immediately say, "Wow, this is an accusation from Christians or something." Not at all. Even we Christians rarely say such things. But that accusation, it turns out, has existed since long ago. And Donitan provides an explanation or an argument defending a certain point, providing an explanation that it is impossible for Muhammad to collaborate with the devil. Well, here we will try to critique Donitan's arguments. And the second next, we will discuss what the problem Donitan raised is. That is, the authorship of the four Gospels is unclear, proving the Bible is human creation. Well, from this discussion, perhaps you have noticed, why is Andre's content not too complex this time? Yes, I chose to just be entertainment but also for us to learn, friends. Because of that, I want to give practical tips for you to answer what the problem is or to answer these polemics. Well, friends, speaking of which, before I continue further, friends. Actually, some time ago, about one, two, three weeks ago, two weeks ago, friends, I and the team went on a mission to a place called SOE, and there we conducted a mission. And you can watch the video at the link that I will put in the comment section. But you can check the UB Media channel, and there you will see our mission in SOE, and then there I realized that many people at this time are very, very ignorant of Christianity. Well, because of that, the ministry that I am doing through social media is a ministry that I long for to be a ministry that provides strength and steadfastness rationally and logically about Christianity to Christians. Well, because of that, I hope that this ministry will be a blessing, friends, to each of us. Anyway, I want to greet some friends who have joined. Shalom to the friends who have joined. Thank you to the admin friends who have joined. And thank you to Gandalf the White who has been a blessing. God bless you. Shalom. Shalom to Bro Jonathan from Sydney. Wow, amazing. To Justice League from Goa. To Ninja Hatori, Tekno CCTV. Shalom to Mahres. 07 Lita ET to Crisel Farin Adi, Sari Teserani and Kristin Jasbubu Villa and Mars Marshalem. Shalom, shalom, Putri Lovely to Torang Tinambunan, then vlog Bukusuma, David Side, Super Buff Dog Holder, then Joe Rock, then Frozen, and other friends. Ahmad Satiri, wow, even the measurement is logged out. Well, those are the facts that are actually too many to mention, which often, forgive me, Muslims don't know either. Unfortunately. There is Elin Harvianti, there is Nana Lee, there is DPA Franiona, shalom. There is Gusti Bina from Palangkaraya. Ready. There is Violet Ae, then Deus Ignos Cit, there is HRC, Shalom Alda Cantika, Marten Billy, Jasa Jas Jayas. Then there is Dayahe Hed Rahim. Wow, there is Robin Andersen. Then there is Violet Ane, for online culinary friends. Ready. Okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay. Let's continue, friends. Thank you again to all the friends who have joined this stream. Well, I want to start with a disclaimer first. So, if you notice, there is one friend who is very diligent in appearing. Yes, thank you to Lea Movida who commented here. Her comment is, "How can you live so comfortably on a crooked path? You are shown the straight path, the path of truth. Why are Christians so stubborn?" Well, if you meet people who say, "We are the straight path and you are the misguided, crooked path, not the truth, and so on." Actually, if you meet people like this, then I encourage you to answer. Actually, we have the right to question them too. What is the evidence that your path is the straight path? And what is the evidence that the path you are following is the truth? They claim, we have the right to question their claims. So, actually, others have the right to say their path is straight. And in this case, others have the right to say that the path that our Muslim friends are following is a crooked path. Of course, they have that right, don't they, friends? Well, because of that, friends, when you meet people like this, Christians should not forget that the Bible also says that in Proverbs 14:12, there is a way that seems right to a person, but its end is the way to death. So, speaking of the straight path, everyone can claim their path is straight. But the straight path that people claim, one must remember, once again, the Bible says there are people who think their path is straight, but its end is death. Well, in this case, friends, as Christians, we have the right, once again, to provide an answer. We have the right to question, perhaps the straight path you mean is the path to death. Well, that's just logical or permissible, isn't it? Permissible. Well, in this case, remember well, for our Christian brothers and sisters, that death is the consequence of taking the wrong path. And I want to encourage you, give you advice, not to take the wrong path, and not to think that just because many people are following that path, we think that path is straight. Many people are following that path, so we think that path is the right path. Oh, it turns out that path is the wrong path. Well, so if there are friends, there are people who say this, "Hey, look at my religion, it's the most correct." Why? Because many people are logging into my religion, many people are joining my religion. Many people are converting to my religion. Well, friends, you have to tell that person, just because many people are going there. Even if it's true, usually they are lying too. Usually, they are just forcing it. Isn't there someone who says, "Oh, on the channel of Kodonditan, there are people logging in every day, people joining every day, people doing this." Well, they are just relying on the number of people. Well, for those who rely on the number of people, tell them. The Bible has already said, "The gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and many are the ways that lead to destruction." Just say that. Just say that because the end is death. Yes, that's it. So, friends, I hope that you all will eventually have steadfastness of faith to show people who like to, what is it, want people to join our religion and so on, but use methods like that. Well, you have to give an answer. You have to give an answer. Well, this is like our friend Bosubatomo said, many are called, but few are chosen. That's why Christianity, I always believe this, Christianity's spirituality is not in what is seen in worldly terms. Worldly terms are about numbers. Worldly terms are about who is the greatest, the most magnificent. Christianity is not like that. Christianity often says that in weakness there is strength. In suffering, there is happiness, there is comfort. Christianity always teaches that salvation is indeed not for many people. In the sense that many people will not choose salvation and they will choose destruction. Well, that's the reality. So I hope friends will eventually understand that Christianity is very different from others. And I hope for friends who are in Christian areas, in your areas, don't be fooled by such propaganda. Well, you might ask, Andre, Andre, why is Kreakangan's concern like that? Yes, because I see it myself, friends, that many Christians in the area do not find clarity. They are very influenced by social media like this. Which only shows numbers, which only shows propaganda for what? To show that our religion is the true one. Then, by various means, they try to increase the number of their religion. Yes, that's how it is. I hope that content like this is not just for friends who diligently follow my content, but also for friends who at this time have not been exposed or do not know yet. Because of that, thank you again, friends, for all of you who have supported this kind of ministry, supported content like this, because you are helping to ensure that the content I have can continue to be recommended to more Christians. Yes, the mentality of a thug who feels like a hero when they have many friends. That's how it is. When they have many friends, many supporters, they dare. But if they don't have supporters, they become quiet. Usually, they are shy like a cat. That's how it is. Well, here we have a friend, Zaljalah, who says, "Intelligent Christians will surely convert." If you meet someone like Zaljalah, what do you answer? I want to know. I want to know. If intelligent Christians will surely convert. Is propaganda like that still effective? For me, that kind of thing is very stale. Rather, what is this? Soy sauce bottle, vinegar bottle, what bottle? Truly a real recklessness. Okay, okay, those funny claims. Okay, let's continue, friends. Let's continue. We will move on to Donitan's arguments that I am actually interested in discussing when he answers the accusation that the Quran is a result of collaboration with the devil. Once again, this is an accusation, and this accusation has been around for a long time, and Donitan provides an answer. Let's listen first, friends. Let's listen first. He says Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, this Muhammad is a deceiver. Muhammad is a fabricator. So the Quran is Muhammad's fabrication. If such an accusation is made, if they accuse him now, it's too late. They accused him even when the Prophet was alive. Yes. Yes, yes. Yes. So later it will be said that it is the fabrication of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, and even Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, is accused of being helped by the devil. There are such things. All of that can be easily refuted. The last one. So friends can see that the accusation has been around for a long time. Once again, this is not an accusation from anyone. And besides, I rarely see Christians, yes, I said earlier, not saying that, but this is something that has happened for a long time, as Donitan admits. Well, let's listen to what Donitan's argument is to prove that his prophet did not collaborate with the devil in the Quran. Let's listen, friends. All of that can be easily refuted. The last one is said that Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, must have been helped by the devil. Here, we Muslims ourselves, when we want to read the Quran, what are we taught to say? Auzubillahim minasyaitan. Yes, right? How could the devil teach Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, to write to be protected from himself? The logic doesn't make sense, right? It's impossible, right? Well, so in the Quran, it is also taught that Satan or the devil is our main enemy. So how could the enemy we consider an enemy teach him to write the Quran? It doesn't make sense. With that method or with that logic or with that argument, it is impossible for Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, to be taught by the devil or Satan to write the Quran. Because the Quran itself opposes and condemns the devil. Yes. So, you can see Donitan's argument. He tries to defend that the devil cannot teach Muhammad to write the Quran. Because, he says, the Quran clearly, and in this case, Islam opposes the devil. Yes. Well, so from this argument alone, I am interested in critiquing it. Because Donitan makes two arguments. First, his argument is that before reading the Quran or praying, Muslims say "Auzubillahim minasyaitanirrajim," right? Yes. This is what? A claim or words from or a mention, like that. A Muslim will say it, meaning "I seek refuge in Allah from the accursed Satan." Yes, that's it. Then Donitan says that clearly in Islam, the enemy of Muslims is the devil, Satan, and so on. Well, that's Donitan's claim. Well, as someone who is, perhaps you are offered to switch servers to there, switch servers to the other side, I invite you to think. Try to think about Donitan's answer. Yes, once again, this is an accusation not from us, but an accusation that Donitan says has been around for a long time. Well, if it's been around for a long time, Donitan says the answer is that Muslims are asked to say, "I seek refuge from the accursed devil." Yes, it is said so. So that's Donitan's argument. Well, it is true that Muslims are taught to oppose the devil, taught to be against Satan. Yes, right? It seems so. But the question is this, friends. Does the devil always have to look cruel, evil, terrifying to destroy humans? That's the question. Does the devil always have to look evil, cruel, terrifying to destroy humans? Try to answer me, you who think logically or sanely. Is there a possibility that the devil doesn't always have to appear as an enemy, but more than that, the devil acts the opposite. He acts as someone who deceives humans. Well, Christian teachings teach that the Bible says the devil is a liar. In Genesis 3:4-5, the devil twists the narrative of truth. So he deceives, he lies, he appears as if he is right. And the devil disguises himself as or as an angel of light. In 2 Corinthians 11:14, you will find that. So the devil ultimately lies, disguises himself, deceives, and his ultimate goal is to deny the divinity of Jesus, the Son of God. 1 John 4:3. Well, from here, you should realize what I want to say. That's it. From here, as a Christian, if you meet a Donitan who says, "Oh, we Islam cannot possibly collaborate with the devil in the Quran because we oppose the devil." Oh, yes, yes, yes, you can. But the problem is, is the devil's job to lie, to deceive, to disguise himself as an angel and teach that Jesus is not God? That's it. So from there, that's my answer. That's my answer. So, when Dondi says, "Oh, Islam itself teaches to fight the devil or be enemies with the devil." Oh, yes, yes, yes, be enemies in the sense of not committing immoral acts, not committing bad acts. Oh, yes, yes, yes. But what about, what about the devil's other tricks, which are not seen as major sins, adultery, what is it called, deceit, murder, what else. Yes, just name them. But rather, the devil acts with what attitude? With the attitude of making people abandon the truth, thinking they are right. Making people abandon the right path, thinking their path is straight. Well, what if it's like that, devil? What? That's our question. Yes, right? And as Christians, we see that the devil's work is to make people deny that Jesus is God. To make people deny Jesus, the Son of God. To make people deny. Yes, according to you, which teaching ultimately denies Jesus, the Son of God? Yes, right? Which teaching denies it? Yes, please give your answer, according to you, which teaching denies it? Well, for friends, there is Andromeda who says, "For the host, meet Donitan directly for a debate." Hmm. You find the truth, you don't have to debate. You listen to my comments, you listen to my teachings, give me arguments. Rather, it's more accurate to say, Donitan, please argue, please counter the teachings that I am teaching. Or please counter my arguments. But Dondi never, never can answer like that, right? Yes, right? Yes. Yes. Oh, teachings, teachings. Wow, gallon religion. What is it? Gallon religion. Gallon teachings. Well, that's how it is. The devil disguises himself as an angel. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Well, that's how it is. Well, so it's like this. Actually, there is one problem when Donitan defends his religion regarding the issue of devils, demons, that Muslims are taught, what is it called, teach, or Muslim Islam teaches that Muslims' enemy is Satan. But do you know, friends, that in Islam there is something called the teaching of jin qarin? What is jin qarin? Jin qarin is a teaching that teaches that this refers to a companion jin that accompanies every human from birth to death. So this Qarin's duty is to whisper temptations, to push humans towards bad deeds, but not to force. Well, so Islam teaches that every human has a qarin, and this is confirmed by a sahih Muslim hadith. Sahih Muslim means a sahih hadith according to the consensus of scholars, this is sahih. This is the true word of Muhammad. This is the true interaction of Muhammad with his companions. And you can see here it says, the Messenger said, the Messenger said, "There is no one among you except that a qarin from the jinn has been appointed to him." Then the companions asked, "Including you, O Messenger?" Then Prophet Muhammad replied, "Yes, but Allah has helped me against him, so he embraced Islam." So it's extraordinary, brothers. Muhammad's jin qarin embraced Islam, and it does not command me except to good. Yes. Okay, let's stop here for now. Let's immediately draw a conclusion. Wow, so according to Islamic teachings, everyone has a devil that tempts them to sin, called qarin. And that's the term, and even Muhammad had his qarin. But Muhammad's qarin embraced Islam. So Muhammad's qarin whispers to do good. Yes. Wow, if I were a, what is it called, a follower, I would question, "How nice that the prophet's jin embraced Islam." But anyway, yes, well, that's strange to me. But I don't know if it's strange to you, friends. Is it strange to you? For me, it's strange. But I don't know if it's strange or not for you. But what I mean is this. Are you aware that such teachings, in my opinion, are problematic? Why are they problematic? How can it be accounted for if someone thinks logically? So this comment or teaching has a consequence. It is said that Allah created jin qarin or created a qarin for every human to tempt humans to sin. But the same Allah will punish humans if they sin, and that sin is also because they were tempted or because they were tempted by the jin created by Allah. Well, if these two things are juxtaposed, then my question is, who is actually problematic in these two, what is it, in this matter? Who is actually problematic? Someone commented here, "Jin Andre." This is a desperate comment, they can't answer anymore. Actually, who is problematic if, if for example, I create a tempter, a tempting jin for humans. But I am also the one who punishes humans because I, because humans are tempted by the tempting jin that I created. Is that problematic? Yes, try to explain this, Donitan. Doni says, Islam opposes jinn. Satan, the devil is the enemy of Islam, the enemy of Muslims. But the problem is, according to Sahih Muslim, Allah created the tempting jin. I don't quite understand the synchronization of these two things. Dondi says that because the enemy of Muslims is the devil, therefore it is impossible for Muhammad to collaborate with the devil in the Quran, or for the devil to whisper bad things to Muhammad, resulting in the Quran. The problem is, according to Sahih Muslim, the Messenger himself admits that there is indeed a qarin created by Allah to tempt humans. So in this case, qarin is also a tool. I don't know, I can't imagine it. Confusing, real recklessness, says Harry Rafael. Well, so, so how is Donitan's argument? In my opinion, his argument is too shallow. Too shallow. It looks or sounds right on the surface. But actually, if we think further, this thing is problematic. This thing is problematic. So actually, from the beginning, it's wrong. That's why there are jinn and jun. [Laughs] Peterson. I myself am confused. Well, so even this, according to Ahmad Satiri, wow, this says Muhammad was bewitched. Wow, I didn't include this. But this also needs to be explained. And unfortunately, people like, forgive me, Donitan, in my opinion, are not capable of explaining all of this. Anon says, "Andre speaks without knowledge, cannot distinguish between jinn, Satan, and devil." He only knows how to mislead. Well, you explain it then. What, if the similarity between Satan, jinn, and devil is misleading, tempting, then what's the difference? If that's what you mean, the difference is one is made in one place, one is made in another, one is made in another, for example, Konoha, one is made in the moon split in two, one is made in Mecca, for example, or what? Yes, that's the only difference. If everything is misleading, everything aims to mislead, everything aims to oppose the truth and so on. What's the difference then? Yes, right? Different manufacturers, maybe one is Japanese, one is Chinese. That's how it is. So, so please give me an explanation. Give me an explanation. Well, so it's like this, friends. Don't get trapped. Once again, I'm anticipating this. Someone will comment later, "Wow, what's the difference?" "Wow, you don't understand the difference." I don't care. My main point is what is misleading. Agree? If something is misleading? If something deceives, if something turns right into wrong, then the essence is the same, right? Satan is Satan, there is no good Satan. Well, that's it. That's Satan with nano-nano flavor, hybrid jinn. Well, that's it. So, that's it, friends. I hope we all understand what it means. Well, so when people like this try to defend their religion, in my opinion, it just shows more blunders. Yes, unfortunately. Well, let's continue, friends. Welcome to WK from Hong Kong. Okay, thank you, thank you. Wow, I can't. It's difficult. It's difficult. It's difficult. It's difficult. It's difficult. Well, let's continue. I can't comment anymore, friends. I want to comment but I'm afraid of being wrong. Well, I'll just be quiet. Let's continue to the authorship of the four Gospels, as stated by Donitan, it is unclear. Let's listen, friends. The people who wrote in the PB, especially the four gospels, were not people who knew Jesus directly. Hmm. Hmm. Not people who knew those who knew Jesus directly. No. Well, these four gospels, when they were first found, there was no acknowledgment from the author that my name was Titus. None. Or Luke and John also had no acknowledgment. Or my name is Mark, none. Where did these names come from? From these names, it turns out they were only attributed by the early Church Fathers. The first was by Saint Papias. Wow, Ditan is staring very meaningfully. Okay, let's continue. I am interested in the comment from our friend earlier, Tuyul and Makul. Tuyul and Mbak Yul, the tuyul repented. Who said that earlier? There was someone who commented here, "Tuyul and Mbak Yul, the tuyul repented." Oh, here it is. The story is similar to Tuyul and Mbak Yul, the tuyul repented. Well, if you want to believe religious teachings that teach tuyul to repent, jinn to repent, then please. Yes, please, please, it's okay, it's your right. You can believe that. But for me, it's difficult. I cannot, I cannot believe that there is such a thing, let alone sent by the creator to tempt humans. That's also crazy to me. Well, that's it. Well, let's continue, friends. Let's continue. The authorship of the Gospels is said to be unclear. Well, you can see that Donitan makes a claim that the Gospels were written unclearly because why? Because there are no names. But in reality, the early church said that the four Gospels have been linked to four people who clearly became what we see today as the authors of the four Gospels, namely Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Matthew was a disciple of Jesus. Mark was a companion of Paul and Peter. Luke was a companion of Paul, and John was a disciple of Jesus, mentioned as the most beloved, or the beloved disciple. Well, this is a fact that we cannot ignore. This means that if it was unclear from the beginning, then the early church would have clearly stated that these four are disputable. What does that mean? It means it's unclear who wrote them. But in reality, according to the early church, these four people have been linked as eyewitnesses who wrote these four Gospels. Yes, for example, Donitan mentioned Papias. Papias was the first to mention these four people as authors of the Gospels. Well, who is Papias? Papias was a friend of Polycarp. And Papias was also a disciple of John. John, the author of the Gospel of John. So the tradition received and witnessed by Papias is something that is strong evidence for us. Because no matter what, we who are living now, 2000 years after the writing of the Bible or the writing of the four Gospels, compared to Papias who lived in the second century, he wrote this approximately, or approximately in the year 100. Compared to us, Papias knows better, right? Well, in the end, friends, whose opinion is more authentic for us to listen to? Is it us who today are so sure, so sure, saying "Oh, this is unclear, unclear, unclear." But then someone from the early church says, "Yes, the authors are John, Matthew, Mark, Luke." Yes, that's right. Well, which one is clearer? It's clearer from people like Papias. And not only Papias, Irenaeus, he was a disciple of Polycarp, and he was a disciple of John. Irenaeus, he is also, I mean, he was a disciple of Polycarp, and Polycarp was a disciple of John. Irenaeus explains that yes, as Papias said, so it is. Well, so this becomes very strong evidence to say that the authorship of the Bible, the authorship of the four Gospels, is clear. And it is permissible for us to believe the words of Papias and Irenaeus. Because legally, logically, what is the problem? Yes, if we don't believe that it's the writing of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, and so on, then ultimately we have a stronger reason to understand or believe what Papias and Irenaeus said. That's how it is, friends. Well, so it's like this. Christians, once again, must understand that there is a difference in perspective between Islam and Christianity regarding holy scriptures. which Muslims often use to confuse Christians. Yes, to confuse Christians and make Christians think, "Wow, wow, so my Bible is not the word of God. My Bible is not true or not true." Why? Because they use the perspective of Muslims or Islam. That's roughly it. Well, now we believe that Muslims believe that the Quran is the word of Allah through Muhammad, and it must be original from Muhammad, entirely from Muhammad. And Christians believe that the Bible is the writing of authors inspired by the Holy Spirit, and it can contain the words of Jesus or the stories of Jesus. Those are two very different things. So regarding authorship, actually, the problems faced by Muslims are more numerous. Because Christians believe that within those writings, there is testimony about Jesus, about Jesus' teachings, about his example, about the reflection of the author, about what he encountered regarding Jesus. So Christians do not need to adopt the Muslim perspective on the definition of their holy scriptures. That's it. Well, because of that, actually, the problem faced by Muslims is heavier than Christians in defending that their scripture is truly from Allah. Why? Because the Quran, if it is from Allah, must be without textual variants, must be without textual differences. And second, it must be complete. It must not be incomplete. What does that mean? It must be complete. It must be what? It must be truly complete, revealed by Allah to Muhammad. Yes. Well, to people like this, I will always raise a problem or a fact that they should answer. What is the problem? The problem is, for example, in Sunan Ibn Majah hadith, there is a testimony witnessed or a statement witnessed by Aisha, that verses concerning the law of stoning and the verses on breastfeeding of adults 10 times were revealed. The sheets of these verses were under the bed. And when Muhammad passed away, what happened was that birds came and ate them. In another narration, any animal ate those verses. So, those verses, namely the verses on stoning and breastfeeding, according to this sahih hadith, are something that has been eaten and is considered lost. Yes, in Ahmad's hadith, it is even stated here that Aisha said, "Indeed, the verse on stoning and breastfeeding an adult 10 times was revealed and was on a paper under my bed." When the Messenger passed away, it is said here that he was sick, we were busy, termites entered the house and ate the paper. So, according to the narration conveyed by the hadith, there are verses today that are not in the Quran about stoning and breastfeeding. Well, if they are not there, then can the word of Allah be lost? If they are not there, does it mean that the sanctity of the Quran, which is sanctified by Muslims, is no longer sacred? Well, those are questions that Christianity itself should answer. Wow, I just found out, Bro. Putra Kristian has been annulled because according to another hadith, it turns out that five times breastfeeding of adults is the latest version, not 10 times. Actually, regarding Islam, when we talk about verses that are abrogated and abrogating, it's a different matter, and there's a bigger problem. But actually, we don't want to look for trouble. Well, but if they keep looking for trouble with us, then we'll open it up one by one, we'll open it up a little. And when we open it up a little, usually their only job is what, friends? [Laughs] Expired packaged milk, what is this? Usually, when that happens, what then? Yes, they get angry. They get angry. Well, if they get angry, then we'll just be quiet. Yes, that's how it is. Yes. I have no comment. It's true. It's not that we don't know. Yes, we know. Well, but the problem is that many people don't know. Many people don't know, and in this case, many Christians are also very naive and don't know many things. Yes, thank you again to all the friends who have supported this kind of ministry. Because with that, we continue to spread awareness. Awareness of what? Awareness for people not to be deceived by false truths. Once again, false truths. Okay, okay, okay, okay, okay. Well, so how do Muslims defend the hadith about the lost verses? Yes. Well, in this case, Donitan clearly cannot just say, "Oh, this Quran is clearly the word of Allah." Well, if you notice, actually Donitan mentions various miracles that he claims, like "Oh, the Quran already contains information about iron descending from the sky. The Quran already contains information about the sea being divided in two, in the sea of Gibar. The Quran already contains information about the oxygen being thin at high altitudes. The Quran already contains information about what else? The moon being split in two. I don't know anymore. The Quran already contains information that mountains are pegs of the earth." So Donitan talks about the Quran having scientific information proven by science. A lion sneezes, a kitten comes out. Calm down, calm down, Bro Cedrick. Calm down. Not yet, not yet, not yet. So, Donitan already has information about various claims he makes about science. Well, actually, friends, I have planned to invite a friend who will debunk, expose all these claims. I already have a plan to invite. Do you know who I will invite? Yes, who will we invite to talk about all sorts of claims in the Quran. There are miracles here, miracles there. Yes, then Quranic verses will be recited, and then cows will come closer. Quranic verses will be sung, and then the infidels will cry. [Laughs] Wait for it, friends. I will invite you. Wait for it, friends, for the episode. Wait for it, friends. Wow, they are already commenting. It must be Kumaila who is invited. Oh, no, no, Kumaila. I don't want her to talk about that. Well, let's just wait. Let's just wait. Okay, okay, okay, okay. Thank you, friends, for commenting. Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you. Well, next, friends, tonight I will not discuss much more, but wait, I want to make an announcement. Wait for the second episode with Eli Miron on Tuesday. So, the continuation of my content with Eli Myon will be on Tuesday at 7:30 PM, friends. Wait for the time. And if you missed the first edition, please click on my YouTube channel. There is an edition about with Elia Myon in the first episode. Was the first edition exciting for you? I received a lot of responses saying it was very cool, very exciting, and a blessing. And friends, please click if you missed the first episode with Elia Myon. And together today, I have also released a video on UB Media. Friends can open it after this. I will put the link in the comment section, in the description section. Please click on how UB Media's ministry, our KKR in SOE NTT. So, two weeks ago, I and the team went to SOE and there we ministered, and there we strengthened the faith of the students there. There were 3,500 people present at that time, and thank God, many of them responded to the Gospel, responded to the truth, and there we also discussed apologetics. Well, please watch it so it can be a blessing, and you can see it on the UB Media channel. I think I will stop here, friends. There are several ministries waiting, and of course, pray that this ministry will be a blessing. And thank you again because all your friends support it in any way you can, by watching, by views, by likes, by shares, by comments, everything is a blessing. Thank you again to all, and may this ministry eventually become a blessing to even more people. God bless you all, friends, wherever you are. Welcome to the weekend, prepare yourselves for worship. May you experience God in your deepest hearts. So, make it simple, make it meaningful. May God bless you, all friends. You be the light.