Transcription
Meet Danny Danzig, the developer of the American "Generator of Engine," the world's largest newspaper, The Wall Street Journal. In a prominent article spanning over half a page, dedicated to his breakthrough energy-saving technology, he became a celebrity. Thus, the American fuel-less magnetic propulsion generator, developed by ABC company, received powerful media support from the most influential business publication on the planet.
The device developed by ABC company is a massive rotor that rotates without any external power supply, generating approximately 25 kilowatts of electricity and is intended for autonomous power supply. It turns out that a technology that, from the perspective of official science, cannot work, not only exists but also functions, in particular, providing electricity to a firm that manufactures modular shooting ranges in Las Vegas.
But even if this is the case, will this development reach the mass consumer? After all, there have been many similar companies, starting with Nikola Tesla, who came up with interesting energy devices, and all of them were successfully suppressed. More on this at the end of the broadcast.
Now let's note a few important factors. Firstly, there is the aforementioned powerful promotion in the central press. Secondly, the head of the firm, William Heinz, is a person from the aerospace industry with an excellent background. He led a team of 50,000 people. It is enough to say that the turnover of his company, Light Signal Aerospace, was 15 billion dollars.
Finally, the third important point is the split in global elites. Hybrid electric and hydrogen cars are becoming not garage DIY projects but industrial models created by automotive giants because hiding alternative technologies in the digital age is becoming practically impossible. In addition, the fierce rivalry with China forces Americans, as they say, to "move their fins."
But the main question that everyone asks themselves is: where does the energy in such generators come from? The answer is both simple and complex at the same time. Energy comes from the etheric flow that bathes the Earth. Many will sarcastically write in the comments that all these fairy tales about ether, zephyr, and kefir are only for lovers of free electricity. The most effective technologies for them still remain magnets attached to the meter.
But it turns out that similar technologies using permanent magnets have long been used, even in the USSR, on airplanes and submarines. And the law of conservation of energy is not violated here at all, because it is written for closed systems, and permanent magnet generators are open systems. Therefore, they do not violate the law, but rather support it.
And looking at the household and digital technology around us, each of us thinks that alternating current technology is the pinnacle of technical evolution. But we still know very little about the nature of electricity. What then can be said about the ether, the theory of which was developed as a counterweight to Einstein's relativism?
What's more, we don't even know where rain comes from on Earth. Yes, yes, the simplest answer, "from clouds," is, to put it mildly, not entirely correct. Firstly, science does not know the physical process that would allow clouds to hold hundreds or thousands of tons of water. Secondly, if clouds were somehow capable of holding such masses of water, then after the rain, according to all the canons of science, they should immediately rush upwards to reach equilibrium at a new height, which should be significantly higher. This would be noticeable even to the naked eye. However, we never observe rapid vertical movements of clouds, and science is also silent on this matter.
Thirdly, it often happens that it rains when the sky is completely clear. Such rain is called "blind" when there is not a single cloud in the sky, and yet it rains. Another interesting question is why clouds form in winter, because at a 30-degree frost, water cannot evaporate. Someone will answer that wind brings clouds from the seas and oceans to the middle of the continent. But in calm weather, clouds also form over land.
It turns out that water during rain is synthesized by some natural process that is currently unknown to us. Snow, which is so familiar to all of us, holds no less mystery. Wikipedia informs us that snow is a form of atmospheric precipitation consisting of small ice crystals. However, there is no clear information about why small ice crystals take on such a bizarre shape.
Each of us absorbed knowledge about the water cycle on the planet in school. The scheme of this process is very simple and is often depicted like this or like this: water evaporates from the surface of oceans and land, vapor molecules rise up, where water condenses into clouds, and falls as precipitation on the earth. In the mountains, snow melts and forms streams, which merge together to create a river.
But where is the tap that supplies water to these mountains, so that it flows down from there in waterfalls? The summit of this mountain in Venezuela is a flat plateau where there is no snow or lakes to sufficiently support the waterfalls. Nevertheless, at the foot of this mountain, the Amazon and Orinoco river basins originate. And it is impossible to explain the presence of waterfalls at the source of Mount Roraima according to the school scheme of the water cycle in nature.
The dew familiar to us can be found only in the morning on the grass, but farmers know well that there is underground dew, as well as diurnal dew that settles inside the plowed fields. Confirmation of water synthesis in nature came from cases of ice tsunamis filmed in the USA and Canada. Snow synthesized in spring, in May, and such cases are not isolated.
To put it simply, these are shots of ice materialization from the ether that people have filmed. Scientists have established the fact that as the Earth moves through space, it loses part of the atmosphere's substance. Nevertheless, the planet's atmosphere remains. This means that the lost substance is restored. This is true for other substances that make up our planet as well.
Such facts of substance synthesis include the restoration of oil in depleted wells. It turns out that in long-discovered fields, 150 percent of the oil has been extracted from previously calculated reserves, and there are many such places on Earth: Georgia, the Carpathians, South America. In Russia, the Romashkinskoye oil field, discovered over 70 years ago, is among the top ten super-giants according to international classification. It was considered 80 percent depleted, but every year its reserves are replenished by one and a half to two million tons. According to new calculations, oil can be extracted until 2200, and this is not the limit.
In the old oil fields of Grozny, the first well was drilled at the end of the 19th century, and by the middle of the last century, 100 million tons of oil had been pumped out. Later, the field was considered depleted, and after 50 years, reserves began to recover. So, the synthesis of elements on our planet is not a miracle or an anomaly; it is a regular phenomenon. Water is synthesized under certain conditions and in certain areas of heterogeneity of our planet.
The water cycle in nature undoubtedly exists, but it is a process of matter transformation or materialization from the ether, as some would say. Vernadsky himself suggested that in the Earth's crust, some substances decay and others synthesize. In 1911, he gave a report on the gas exchange of the Earth's crust in St. Petersburg at the Second Mendeleev Congress. By the way, in Mendeleev's table, ether was initially at the very beginning of the table. See another of our broadcasts for more details on this.
Another brilliant scientist of the early 20th century, Nikola Tesla, on the contrary, suggested that ether is a highly dense matter, not a gas. The concept of ether as being present everywhere and influencing our material world, but not perceived by the senses, has existed since ancient times, from Eastern teachings to ancient Greek philosophy. Later, René Descartes moved the concept of ether from the philosophical and religious plane to the scientific.
And later, with the development of optics, it was experimentally found that light has a wave nature, meaning that when light from several sources is superimposed, the phenomenon of interference, or the propagation of light through an obstacle, the phenomenon of diffraction, light behaves like waves, for example, waves on the surface of water. But if light is waves, then there must be a medium through which these waves propagate. After all, there can be no sea waves in the absence of a sea. Therefore, light waves must oscillate something, a luminous matter, ether.
Later, other ranges of electromagnetic radiation besides light were discovered and studied. Their wave nature turned out to be similar to the nature of visible light, which further strengthened physicists' views on ether as an imperceptible and all-pervading matter. Thus, the 19th and early 20th centuries became times of flourishing for numerous ether theories and models.
And the ether theory did not die out on its own. It was destroyed. For example, in 1922, on its centenary, the German Scientific Society decided to exclude criticism of the theory of relativity from the official academic environment. As a result, a ban was imposed in Germany on criticizing the theory of relativity in academic press and in the educational process. This ban has been in effect since 1922 and continues to this day.
This position was confirmed by the Nazi government. Even after the start of World War II, in 1940, in Munich, a decree was issued recognizing the theory of relativity as the foundation for the development of physical science. And this is despite the nationality of the father of relativity. After the fall of Nazism in 1945, criticizing the theory of relativity was equated with denying the Holocaust and anti-Semitism. Einstein himself, a special form of anti-Semitism, is stated.
What about the Soviet Union? Since 1922, Einstein became a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and from 1926, a foreign member of the USSR Academy of Sciences. And even such a prominent Soviet scientist as Timiryazev, after a report at the Fifth Congress of Physicists on the experiments of the American physicist Miller, which refuted Einstein's theories, was ostracized by supporters of the theory of relativity, namely by the eminent Soviet scientists-relativists Ufa, Frenkel, Landsberg, and Mandelstam.
In 1930, Glavnauka closed the Physical Society, leaving only an association of physicists led by I.V. There was a special decree of the TsIK and VKP(b) on the discussion of relativism, in which all opponents of the theory of relativity were classified as either right-wing deviationists or minority idealists. And from 1938, the USSR Academy of Sciences did not finance any scientific work that in any way contradicted the theory of relativity.
And as a culmination, in 1964, the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences issued a secret decree prohibiting all scientific councils, journals, and scientific departments from accepting, considering, discussing, and publishing works criticizing Einstein's theory. In 1966 alone, the Department of General and Applied Physics of the USSR Academy of Sciences sent 24 pairs of "nuts" to doctors for treatment. This is how scientists who disagreed with the theory of relativity were subjected to forced psychiatric examination, after which their scientific career could be forgotten.
As early as 1998, a commission for combating pseudoscience and falsification of scientific research was established as a scientific coordination organization under the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences. And in 2013, very strange people, far from science, joined this frankly inquisitorial structure, for example, journalists, illusionists, and even citizens of the USA.
In other countries, everything happened and is happening according to a similar scheme. Einstein is a genius because his teachings are correct, and his teachings are correct because Einstein is a genius. Therefore, it turns out that some influential group has redirected the development of science and technology along a different path of development. And instead of transmitting electricity over distances and obtaining clean and ecological energy, we got wires and oil pipelines.
Let's imagine that we live in a world where everyone has a generator of inexpensive electricity, and everyone can install special equipment at home to receive electricity without any wires. Perhaps it is precisely to prevent the emergence of such freedom that we were directed along this path. Let's discuss this in the comments, and see you in the next broadcast, which will likely be dedicated in more detail to Einstein's biography and figure. See you on Karaul [music].