Transcription
Hey everybody, Dr. G here. I'm a clinical and forensic psychologist as well as a body language expert. And today we're going to be analyzing more of the Epstein files. Before we get started with this, couple of quick things. One, I wanted to make sure you know this is not a psychological evaluation of any kind. These are just my opinions. In addition to that, I do want to remind you to like and subscribe if you want to see more content just like this. All right, let's go.
What we're going to be analyzing today is a list that Jeffrey Epstein sent himself a few weeks before he died. This is a long list of names. We're going to go through who those names are. We're going to talk about what it might mean, but this was an email he sent to himself. In addition to that, we're going to be looking at other strange emails that I found in the Epstein files, as well as some pictures. But first, we're going to watch a brief clip of former President Clinton reacting to some of the Epstein files. Now, I did a previous analysis where I talked about the fact that he shows a lot of deception. But this is something where he's actually reacting to pictures that are in the Epstein files. Let's talk a little bit about some of the behavior and body language that we see, and then we're going to move on to the list. All right, let's just jump right in.
>> Why did you write this letter?
>> Why did I? Because I was requested to contribute a nice letter for his birthday book.
>> And who asked you to?
>> What we're looking at now is he's going to be reading a letter from Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday book. And then we're going to look at him reacting to some pictures from the Epstein files.
>> Can you please read the letter for the record?
>> Yes. It's reassuring, isn't it? to have lasted so long across all the years of learning and knowing, adventures and errors, and still to have your childlike curiosity, the drive to make a difference, and the
>> Now, that was very interesting when he said childlike curiosity. Maybe it was the wording, but immediately he starts stroking his forehead. We do that when we feel very, very stressed. When you think about something you're concerned about, and it's extreme concern, that's about the only time you start doing this. So, watch the timing of when he starts touching his forehead.
and still to have your childlike curiosity, the drive to make a difference, and the solace of friends
>> and then you see him close up afterward.
>> You appear to be comfortable with Mr. Essi in this photo. Would he disagree with
>> that characterization? You were creating a characterization. He's already responded to your question about the picture.
>> I'm comfortable. I'm comfortable here.
>> I'm not happy, but I'm comfortable. See, this is one of the things that's so interesting about Bill Bill Clinton. I know he's joking, but he says, "I'm not happy, but I'm comfortable." With a big smile on his face. He is able to hide how he actually feels with that big smile.
>> And my conscience is clear. That helps.
>> Interesting body language to close up after you say, "My conscience is clear. Let me see. Right now, he seems to have his guard down as he's looking at the pictures with Jeffrey Epstein. It seems to evoke genuine joyful memories for him.
>> Okay.
>> Now, the way this smile appeared looked quite different than the one we saw a minute ago. This looks like a genuine smile right here. You can tell by the wrinkles next to his eyes. You can tell by the corners of his mouth. This looks like a real smile. What's so strange about this is for the majority of us, if we knew somebody like Jeffrey Epste and later found out that he was this terrible guy, it would contaminate the pictures for us. We would look at it, we might feel disgust, we might feel shame, we would likely not immediately feel good reflecting on whatever memories you have with this person. So his involuntary reaction is notable because of that.
>> Okay.
>> Mr. President, we have about 5 minutes remaining in the majority's first hour. So, I just want to ask you some questions related to the crimes committed by Mr. Epstein and Miss Maxwell, did you?
>> And the the last thing I'll leave you with body language wise, just because I think this is very interesting, he just mentioned that he's going to ask him about the crimes of Epste and Maxwell. Watch what he does right here by
>> Mr. Epste and Miss Maxwell. He withdraws his lips. We do that unconsciously to remind ourselves to not say certain things. So, he's reminding himself as they're talking about Jeffrey Epstein's crimes, there's something that he doesn't want to say.
I know as well as anybody that with everything going on in the news right now, it feels chaotic. It feels overwhelming. And the worst thing we could do right now is to narrow our informationational diet because that's when blind spots appear and those can be dangerous for our information. And that's why I want to show you Ground News, the sponsor of today's video. It's a news comparison platform and it aggregates over 50,000 different news sources. It shows you bias, factuality, and ownership of each source. Instead of giving you what you want to hear, it's going to show you the whole picture for every story being covered. So, let me show you how this works. So, here we've got a story. Gain Maxwell appeals for clemency from Trump as she declines to answer questions from lawmakers. That was covered by over 300 news sources. If you're reading only right-wing news sources like News9, you're going to see headlines like these. Gain Maxwell pleads in vokes fifth. offers to give Trump Clinton assurance. While left-leaning sources like CNN are saying Maxwell can clear Trump's name in Epstein probe in exchange for clemency, attorney says exact same story but covered entirely differently based on their leaning. Reading all these different headlines from all these different sources will give you a clearer picture of what's going on and allow you to stay informed. Ground news does not tell you what to think. It just shows you the landscape. It helps you understand the complete picture and how all sides are covering a story. If you want to see the full picture like me and see how news is being covered across the political spectrum, go to ground.news/ news/drg and get 40% off the Vantage plan. The link is in the description. There's a pinned comment and the QR code is right here. That's ground.news/drg because you can't navigate what's happening if you can't see the full picture.
All right, let's get back to the analysis. Now, we're going to move on to Epstein's list. After reading through hundreds of thousands of Jeffrey Epstein emails, I find the ones he sends himself to be some of the most interesting. This was the last email that Jeffrey Epstein ever sent himself. This was on June 30th, 2019. He died August 10th, 2019. So, we're going to go over what this email is, why it's significant, or what it might mean. So, as you can see up here, it's both to and from Jeffrey Epste. He sent this to himself. And the subject line is list for Steve Bannon. So, this is a list of people that he was going to share with Steve Bannon. We're going to go through and I'm going to talk about who's on this list because it's obviously very long. It's about 98 names long if I counted correctly. Now, I want you to keep in mind this email was sent six weeks before he died. And he sent it to himself. Never sent it to Steve Bannon. He just wrote it as a list for Steve Bannon. This was well after the interviews that Steve Bannon had recorded. So, it wasn't in that context. They actually hadn't been emailing back and forth that much around this time. So, it's very curious as to what this list was supposed to be. We're going to go through this list and talk about who some of these people are and what the likely context of this was.
Now, the first name you're going to see there is Mandlesen. and he actually mentions Mandlesson's name twice, both at the beginning and towards the end. For those of you unfamiliar, Peter Mandlesson is involved in trade and politics in the UK. And there were also pictures of him in the Epstein files. So, the fact that he's mentioned twice, I think, is notable. Now, some of the other names are a little bit too vague for us to say for sure. Barnaby could be a number of people. Maybe Barnaby Marsh, who's under elite social circles, but that's unclear. Summers was probably Larry Summers, who was into economics, politics, academia. There's Botstein who was in academia. There's Pritsker who is involved in business and politics. Martin Novak who's in science and math. Marvin Minsky who's in AI and science. Leonard Suskind who's also in science and physics. Strawer who's in science and physics. Krauss who's in science and physics. Lisa Randall who's also in science and physics. Bill Gates who everybody knows. Peter Theal who also everybody knows another billionaire. So these people are in technology and finance. Now, what's starting to get curious about this is that these are not people that he all has solid connections with necessarily. These are not people who would vouch for him publicly. So, the list for Bannon can't just be, well, these are people that would speak well of me because Bill Gates wouldn't have in 2019. If you look later on, you see Clinton's name pop up. There's Prince Andrew. There's all sorts of people that could never speak about him publicly that are on this list. And there people that never would have spoken to Steve Bannon that are on this list. There's no way that Clinton would have spoken to Steve Bannon about this. Nor would Prince Andrew. So, these are not a list of people for Steve Bannon to contact, but these are names that have come up frequently in the Epstein files. Jess Staley, who's in banking and finance. Joyito, who's in technology and academia. It also mentioned Sultan, who very well may be the Sultan he was emailing with. Martin Seligman is mentioned, who is the founder of positive psychology. John Kerry, another person that would never publicly speak about Jeffrey Epstein, nor have any interest in speaking to Steve Bannon. Uh Barack, who is mentioned over and over again in the Epstein files. Prince Andrew, obviously, we all know who Prince Andrew is. We know his connections to Prince Andrew. So it says Prince Andrews because Epstein can't type for anything, but obviously it's talking about Prince Andrew. Jagland, that's another name from politics and diplomacy. Clinton, another name in politics. So these people seem to be mostly clustered together. Bill Richardson in politics and diplomacy as well. It mentioned Ehood. So Ehood Barack again, Woody, which is of of course Woody Allen because he's extremely close with Woody Allen. He's mentioned dozens of times in the Epstein files. Roachchild, which obviously is Rothschild, f finance and banking again, which the Rothschild name comes up over and over again throughout the Epstein files. Alan Dersowitz, who's in law in academia, Kinstar, who's in law and politics.
Now, here's a very odd run of names, and it says Dubai, Castro, Pppel, Queen, Pres, and I'm going to go back over these. Pres, King, PM, Mandlesson, Blair, and Met. Now what's so surprising about this is Dubai obviously is a place but and Castro obviously is likely referencing one of the Castros but PPP is probably supposed to be pope then queen then press as president king PM is prime minister so he's listing off titles then after that says Mandlesson so somehow he associates Mandlesson with all of these titles and then Blair who is probably Tony Blair who was the prime minister of the UK at one point and then Met which is likely Met Merritt or another Scandinavian royal or political contact. So, this is covering his royal or highle contacts right here or at least some of them. And below that, it mentions Gurgen who's in the media, David Gurgen, probably. The name Barack comes up again, which could be a reference to Ehood Brock again because he's mentioned multiple names. Then he ends with Rockefeller, which likely has something to do with finance or connections in the financial world. So, going through that, and I didn't even go through everybody, it begs the question, what on earth is this list? Well, we know it's not a list of contacts for people that would say nice things about him or they would say speak positively to him or would ever speak on the record about him at all. So, we know that's not what it is because some of these people are known to be his friends, but many of them are not. Now, we he made another list of actual contacts and that was an earlier list, but it's very different than this one. So, we know this is not just contacts that he knows. So, it's very possible that some of the people on this list are people that he feels like he has leverage over. Whether that's because he has blackmail material on some people or some other kind of leverage or they owe him favors. This is a list that he had planned to send out and this was the last email that he ever sent himself before he died. So being on this list does not imply wrongdoing, but this list is worth continuing to explore. Almost every single one of these names is mentioned somewhere in the Epstein files. He sent emails to these people. These are people that he knew. They're contacts that he had. They're people that came over. And that's what I'm going to continue to do is I'm going to try to map out why all of these people share a list together. Why is it that this list was so important that it was the last email that Jeffrey Epstein ever sent himself? And he didn't send it out. He never sent it to Steve Bannon. He never sent it to anybody else. He only sent it to himself. And I've researched this. He never sent anything to Steve Bannon after this period at all. In fact, at least nothing that I could find. And interestingly, where he says Barack and Barack, it's possible that one of those is Yehud Barack and the other is Barack Obama. The challenge with Jeffrey Epstein is that he writes so strangely and he's so scattered when he writes at times it can be impossible to decipher things like that. As I continue with this, I'm going to try to continue to map these out and try to make it make more sense because there is more meaning here than this just being a list of people he knows because he sent those before and they don't look like this.
Now, here's a few pictures I found that stood out as well. Now, you've probably seen this picture, but there was an element of it that I hadn't noticed before. If you zoom in right here at this picture, we can't read specifically what it says, but it does say to Jeffrey and it's signed Bill Clinton and it's some kind of letter. And unfortunately, we can't see specifically what it says. We also can't see if it's dated. I would love to know more about this letter. I would love to see what it actually is because as Bill Clinton has asserted over and over again, I wasn't close to Jeffrey Epste. I wrote him a polite letter for his 50th birthday, but that's not what this is. I want to know what this letter actually says and I would love to know if it was actually after the date where he claims to have no longer interacted with Jeffrey Epstein because there are a lot of emails that suggest they continue contact far beyond what Clinton admitted to in his deposition. Something else I ran across that I thought was kind of strange was this wig. It's an extremely cheap wig. He has all sorts of strange roleplay things, but for a billionaire, he doesn't invest much in these things. There's a lot of very cheap stuff he keeps at his properties and it just stands out to me as strange. There's him and Woody Allen together and taking all sorts of weird pictures. This is another one that stood out to me. Now, I ran across this picture and there was really no other context around it. So, there was no other context given, but the idea that he's paying money for something. This seems to be a power play to me. This is something that Jeffrey Epstein would gravitate towards because he loves being able to have power over people. So, something like this, as ridiculous as it is, would probably appeal to him.
We're going to finish on a group of emails that I found particularly strange. These are strange because of how they were redacted, but I'm going to show you what I found in this. So, there was one that just says, "How was it?" That's the whole email. Doesn't show who it was to, just says, "How was it?" This is the following email in order based on the DOJ's website. The next email, they've redacted everything except for the fact it's from Jeffrey Epstein. They allow the word may through a few times and the name gan, but beyond that it's fully redacted. As we keep going, may is the only word they allow through. If we keep going, the name Larry Visoski is the only thing that is not redacted. And then he comes back and says schedule. And then it keeps going with more redactions, redactions after redactions after redactions. Now, there was one other part that I thought was interesting because this goes on, by the way, for hundreds of pages. So, it starts out with how was it and then hundreds of pages of redactions. Obviously, I skipped around because what would be the point of showing you these. The most interesting thing to me is that we if we keep going, there's one page that's almost entirely blacked out, but it does have the name she right here, which there's probably a lot of people with the name she, but I think many of us are going to associate that with China. So, it's interesting. Maybe that's why things are obscured. Maybe that's why things were redacted. Maybe it has some involvement with China. We don't know because they redacted it so much. But the bits that they left are very strange. I think what stands out about this is that China is not mentioned much throughout the Epstein files. There aren't a lot of connections with China talked about. There aren't a lot of relationships with China talked about. So, it's very unusual that this is so redacted and the name she is one of the few names that's left on here.
We'll go ahead and wrap things up for today. Hopefully, this is helping you better understand some of what we found in the Epstein files and helps you better understand some of Bill Clinton's behavior around the Epstein files. I'm going to continue to analyze that list. I'm going to continue to look for emails from Jeffrey Epstein to himself because those are always quite strange. But if there's anything else you want me to analyze, please let me know in the comments below. Last thing before we get finished up is I do want to remind you to like and subscribe if you want to see more content just like this. All right, thanks for watching.