New Covenant Coaching Intensive Intro | The Necessity for Covenant | Session 1 of 16

There we go. All right, so just for the sake of the recording, welcome everyone to the New Covenant Coaching Intensive. I have been looking forward to this with great anticipation, to this New Covenant Coaching Intensive, and I can also see that you all have also been looking forward to this New Coach, New Covenant Coaching Intensive. Yes. Yeah. Yes, lovely.

And we are here basically today. Before we even get started with anything, the first thing I'm going to do is to, well, this is your introdu, this is your first night, and therefore, this is your intro to this coaching intensive. And so, what we're going to do is just give a brief introduction, then orientation. The orient will cover what, what is expected of us throughout the 16 weeks. But it's a 16 weeks here, and I think this is actually the first time that I'm actually going to be, um, well, obviously not speaking about covenants, I'm not living from covenants, because this is, this is, this is my life right here. But this is the first time that I'm actually going to cover the, the topics of covenant in this way, in such a concentrated manner, and bring, I, I firmly believe that this, this coaching intensive is going to serve to repair the breach, so to speak, you know, in scriptural terms, to repair the bridge between the believer's experience today in Christ and what they're reading about in the text. Yeah. This is going to re, pretty much help to identify this, this, this intensive is going to help identify what, um, to identify what the believer is right now, what the experience is, what is the energy source of, of the experience for you, for each and every one of you, to be able to identify where, what you have been given, because most of the times, without identification, most believers, because of a lack of identification, end up boxing in the dark, or trying to hold on to smoke. And smoke in biblical literature is something that is understood to be something that looks real, but if you're trying to hold on to it, you, you, your hand goes straight through it. And in my personal comparison of my denominational Christian era to now, priesthood, it is light and day. Sorry, it's light and dark. Because I'm say, night and day, it is light and dark, night and day difference, is a difference of light, light and darkness, difference of day and night, meaning that this is a totally different world. And in all of our sessions so far, what we have covered, our master series, a series of master series that I think was necessary to help the believers to be able to identify what the Bible is really speaking about, what is the standpoint of the scripters, so that it can bring an awareness of how much, how much things that we have been groomed in that is really anti-good and anti-scriptures. Does that make sense, everybody?

And so, we went through prophets, prophecy, that gave you the scriptural definition and the ancient perspective of prophets. We were je healing, but some of these, some of these master series, H, some of this master series, because of the difference in Cain and Abel perspective here, I began to realize that the content in the master series was being received, but not being understood in the way that it should be understood. What was happening in some of the conversations, even some of the post-sess, post-series conversations, comments, and so on, I realized that it was being understood through key, to an extent, and to some, for some persons, to a greater extent. And that is not necessarily a bad thing, because I've always said that, and I still hold to the fact that if we are, if we really step back from the scriptures and see what the Garden of Eden looks like, it, we come to realize that what makes Jesus a mature son is that he is familiar with the knowledge of with and evil, and able to put it into his correct category and correct perspective to make decisions. But he's only able to do that because he has a proper covenantal education. And this is Israel's. We read the Bible, the whole Bible is written about, is written from the perspective of people in covenant. And in the Western culture, we were not taught covenants. And so, most of us yearn in our hearts to experience what they experience, but the covenantal frame of life is not the Western frame of life, and the Western frame of life is not the covenantal frame of life. And so, most believers, in particular, are disconnected, yearning for what they're seeing in the Bible, but what is seeing in the Bible comes from a particular system of logic, not some super-spiritual insight as you've been taught. When we be, when we began to understand the covenant in the way that we understand the covenant now, when we begin, when we began to, to see the covenant in the way that we see the covenant now, we, well, and, and I can speak from my personal experience only, then was the experience of these characters in the Bible touchable, was it attainable, was it touchable, meaning it was no longer smoke, it was something tangible that I can lay hold of and live from.

And so, this, this, this coaching, this coaching intensive is not only going to educate you on what covenant is, what is it, where you are now, and even if, even though we have been learning over the course of these different programs, that, that, that has be, that has been layer by layer, increasing your awareness of where you have been and starting to engage new knowledge. If we have to be honest with regards to laying hold of the Christ life, covenant is it. And just recently, I wrote something in particular that is, was in response to a, a question, a discussion I was going on before we be, before we even settled on the New Covenant Coaching, um, intensive, a, a response that I wrote in response to one of our most esteemed members. And I thought to myself, well, what the question that, that she asked actually stimulated me to put my thoughts that I actually wanted to, to, to, to, to get the session started with, in writing. And so, I took the opportunity to put it in writing there and to post it on Patreon. And so, I'm going to, I'm going to start by reading this before we get into the orientation and so on, right? Just to give a frame to the fact that covenant is not only, um, not, not only the experience of the biblical authors that many of us are reading into. And what has happened in the Western culture is that we read that they, in a covenant, but it really doesn't mean anything to us because the context of covenant in Western culture has been washed with so many layers of Western arrogance. And when I say arrogance, Western arrogance in the context of the audacity to adjust these concepts to fit our comfort level, to fit our concepts, so that we are comfortable with the concept that when we read covenants, it, it is not really impacting our understanding, nor helping us when we read the texts, the scriptural texts. And so, we're not having the same experience. And when I say the arrogance of the Western culture, if you pay attention to, if you pay attention to where our society is today, our society is today, what, and I say this with caution, but, but at the same time, in with a tongue of integrity, it resembles the Babylon of Peter and Paul's time. Rome was the Babylon then. And the Western culture actually merged these Greek and Roman perspectives. They've actually merged into a space where the Western, the typical Western, just as I was saying, as I said, we were going to be sinking deeper in what we started in the last session. One of the things that has happened in our Western society, and I can say this because of my track record with pneumatology and the exposure that Christ new pneumatology has given me in the context of understanding civilizations and the concepts that the civilizations were based on, I have a very unique understanding of previous civilizations, what the civilizations were based on, an understanding of their existence, and the things that they left behind because of studying scripture. And the Western culture has a lot of characteristics that is inherent to Greeks and Romans that we do not, that we are not aware of. One of which is the, because the Greeks were philosophy, because the exercise with inherent within our culture is the audacity and the arrogance to frame our own perspectives and treat our own perspectives and our opinions as truths. Inherent in the Romans is the perspective which is in, which, which the Greco-Roman society has inherited. They are the characteristics or a characteristic of dominance, right? Dominance by a force and taking over regions, incorporating the perspectives, the philosophies, the ideas of the nations that they take over and create their aversion to it. Pulling these two perspectives together, if you look at Western society, what they have done is, and unknowingly, they have perpetuated the perspectives that they can take whatever they have read into it, look at it through their own lens, consider themselves authorities like Romans, and treat what they say as law. Whilst the Greeks, inherent in the cult, here together with that is the idea that whatever you find in your mind is true. And we have, very prevalent in our society today, and this is not only today, this is something that has matured, and scripture has been subject to this over decades, over centuries, over 2,000 years now, almost 2,000 years, approximately two, two, 2,000 years. What we see today is the maturity of persons who actually assume authority, give their own version, and treat it as though this is it. And anything that is treated, anything that challenges, we have the Roman perspective that it should not be challenged, and you try to destroy anything that stands up against that. And on the Greek side, one of the negative characteristics is the philosophers in that, is that that's combined. And so, in our society, we have the common idea that everybody's right, nobody is wrong, everybody's right, and everybody has the right to be right, and, and everybody has have their own truth. And so, everything is truth. And therefore, what is truth? Yeah. And to say that some, what somebody else is saying is not true is now seen as moral wrong. Could we all say that this is what you're seeing all around us? Yeah. Now, this here that I'm speaking about, biblical literature has been subject to these postures. And so, starting with Western church fathers, Constantine, his councils, what has happened is that these postures have been applied to biblical literature. And it has been applied to the extent that today, statistically, about five years ago, I checked the statistics, I don't know if it's changed now, but at least up to five years ago, we had 3,000 recognized denominations in the Western society. Why? Because the Greek and the Roman perspectives pervade. And you go to any one of these denominations, and they will criticize and destroy the credibility of the other denomination and say that they're wrong, applying philosophies and the philosophical perspective, which is their right to have an opinion, and to say that their musings concerning, because it's so, it's pure musings, the musings of, of the biblical inter, concerning biblical interpretation, must be treated as truth. But everybody's, everybody's right. All the while holding biblical literature that comes from a civilization of people who treat nothing that is not verifiable as truth.

Now, I want you to ruminate on what I'm saying. This literature comes from a society, as I was saying in the last session, comes from a society that treats wisdom, the idea of wisdom, as nothing mysterious. The idea of wisdom is attached to the idea of a, a craftsman, somebody who builds houses, carpenters. We call them trades in our culture, we call them trades. These are artisans, craftsmen. The wisdom of leria is attributed to the knowledge of a craftsman, which means if what you see cannot build a wall in the world of a mason, if what you are saying cannot be practically applied to build a house, then you're a fool. If what you're saying cannot be practically applied in the, in the field of someone who is a welder, if what you're saying cannot weld a proper cage to house lions and they, and they not escape, then your knowledge is foolishness. In the world of a carpenter, if what you're saying cannot build cupboards for your kitchen that could function, then you can't call yourself a carpenter, you're a charlatan. The Bible treats the knowledge of Yahweh as spiritual science. We could say that the, we could say that the knowledge of a mason is the science of concrete. The knowledge of the welder is the science of metal merging metal. The science of the carpenter is shaping wood. The science of the person that is use, that is, that is he works with glass, is, is cutting glass and creating things out of glass. If what you say cannot result in what the end product is supposed to be, then you are seen as, your knowledge is seen as foolishness. We could say that every one of those things are sciences. Does that make sense? All of those things are sciences. In the context of biblical literature, the knowledge of Yahweh is a science, a spiritual science. I would even say, in, to put it in frame, in a frame of our culture, it's science of consciousness. But to say consciousness is not even doing it justice, because the perspective of spirit that the ancients had, in comparison to the perspective of spirit that we are taught in our culture, we are taught that the mind and imagination is abstract, not real. It's not real as a physical realm. The ancient priests, prophets, apostles, Yeshua, they came from a culture that understood that the mind and imagination is made of substance, just like all things of dust is a substance. And the spiritual realm is made, is actually, it exists as a substance that can be interacted with. What you, it give thoughts to that in the Western culture, we treat these things as though it's just something that you're seeing in your mind and imagination. Our research corroborates this, where we have conducted research at The Institute over the fast, over the past nine years, and I very, with great humility and very modestly, I, we count it at 50,000 hours, and it's a lot more than that. We conducted research over the past nine years, over that quote unquote 50,000 hours that corroborated that spiritual, that spirituality, your mind and imagination is, is in fact, a tangible substance. Some of these experiments took place by local and internationally. We had a circle of persons that were involved in the experiments. I, I selected these persons. And locally, we conduct experiments with persons where I would literally, at one location, think of someone in another location. And I won't explain how the research went, but basically, the person at a different location in Trinidad, when, when we thought, or we had had the person think about them, they sat down in a room that was hot, that was very still, no wind coming in, nothing, no movement. And it actually showed that the person in a different location could think about someone, and the thought about someone, whilst in Western culture, we are taught that you're just having a picture of the person, the research showed that thinking about the person was a multiplication of your spirit in the location that resulted in the person experiencing a change of energy in the body, a filling of thoughts that the person had concerning them, as well as they experienced in a still room, they experienced a gentle wind. And as soon as the person would change their mind and stop thinking about them, all of it would stop. It was conducted locally, and it was conducted with persons within the US, as well as in persons in India. So we proved that spirit was substance, and it was a substance, substance that it was experienced. We also conducted experiments where, where persons would imagine an angel and imagine sending this angel, and exactly what was told, exactly what the instruction was to this angel, when, when we imagined the, just imagine the angel arrived, and persons in the, in the, in the, in the environment that we imagined these angels, I'm thinking about it, listen to what I'm saying, we imagined it and sent it, and exactly what the instructions was, is exactly what was fulfilled in the environment. Is, is this making sense, everybody?

So, what we see here in general is that covenant, the covenant in particular, even education of the covenant, provided everything that we needed to really understand how to function in the govern. But this is what we have, what the, what the body text was actually, it was left under the, the authority of persons that didn't come from a society that based their knowledge on that which is verifiable. It was based on that which they thought and felt. 3,000 denominations exist today based on that perspective. And I drew reference to those experiments just to show that what I'm seeing here is not us just believing what we read. It was us taking these things and putting it into practical experiments, understanding what the covenant had in it, understanding what the covenant communicated, understand the perspective of the covenant, the school of thought that the covenant comes from, so that we could really say today that this covenant is what it says. Now, I started seeing there just now that the ancients saw wisdom as something as, as a knowledge of a craftsman. And so, what they saw was wisdom was the ability to apply the knowledge of the craftsman. So, we, we could say that the knowledge of the crops of a mason is, he knows, um, how, what he processes to, to, um, build a wall. He gains wisdom by understanding how to apply that knowledge. And his understanding, or his ability to understand or to frame the mechanics of building the wall, is what they, is what they understand as understanding. Let me say that again. Wisdom in the, in the context of scripts, is seen as the ability to apply knowledge. So, he has a knowledge that this is how you build a wall, you need water, you need bricks, you need something to line to make sure these bricks are straight. This person applying this knowledge, or having the, the wisdom, is the application of the knowledge. The, or the, what we would call understanding in the context of the scriptures, is on, is knowing the dynamics that is involved in building this house or building this wall, which means understanding is knowing the dynamics. Knowledge, we can call it information based on the experience. And wisdom is the ability to apply this information with understanding to achieve the desired result. How many of us here, for the first time, you're hearing it framed like that, right? And I'm not speaking about just in general, I'm speaking about in the context of spirituality in your Bible, right? Which means, which means that they saw the spiritual realm, that is a, that is actually, it exists as a substance. And therefore, the person who is healing, raising the dead, casting out devils, cleansing lepers, he is a craftsman, a spiritual craftsman, that, that, that understands how to apply the knowledge according to the dynamics to achieve the desired results. That's what I just said there. You will not hear that in any church because of just mental assent. And that's why things like healing is seen as a mystery, it's a miracle. A miracle is only a miracle to someone who is not living in the wisdom or in the intelligence or in the science that reproduces that. Someone, an, a farmer seeing somebody like Nikola Tesla work and cause lightning storms will call him a magician, or he may even call him a miracle worker. For Nikola Tesla, everybody know who Nikola Tesla is, right? The inventor of AC current, okay? So, a farmer would see Nikola Tesla stand in a room and harness electricity and have lightning in his hands. The farmer sees he's sewing plants and reaping crop. He sees, no, he'd likely to call him a miracle worker. Is Nikola Tesla a miracle worker? No, not by any stretch. He is simply understanding the physics of electricity. What we will call the physics of electricity. So, so he has knowledge. The application of his knowledge has actually show him, has actually taught him and have come to learn the dynamics, and now he has wisdom, which is the ability to apply this knowledge according to the, to the dynamics to achieve the desired result. This is your Bible. This is your covenant. The prophets refer to what we call laws of physics, laws of electromagnetic energy, laws of gravity. The Prophet Jeremiah calls it covenant. Why is that significant? Because if God calls those things covenant, then this covenant that you're calling the New Covenant works like a law of physics. And if that is not your experience, the Bible is not wrong. Your interpretation of it is wrong. If, if we see something happening, we have learned certain things about God. You see something happening, do you try to fit God into your doctrine, or do you question your interpretation of the text? If you are functioning in prudence, which one would it be? That's a question. That's, no, rhetorical question. Do you blame God or try to fit God into what you were taught, or do you question your interpretation of what you're reading? You should, if you're prudent, you will question the interpretation. In today's society, you have been taught, and it is a common idea that if this Bible is not doing anything, if we are not seeing anything like this, the Bible is robbing. We have a whole society that has taught that the Bible and God should fit within their maxims, their doctrines, which is an assumption, which is an arrogant perspective to think that one's intelligence is the sum total of all intelligence. And just because it is not doing what you desire to do, that it should be deemed false. This is the arrogance that the Bible has been subjected to. And so, what we do with the Bible here at the Institute seems like, wow, when it just came down to a simple question, do we try to fit everything that we read about in the Bible into our doctrines and deem the Bible to be false, as many have deemed it to be outdated, deemed it not useful, or even question that men wrote it, or do you question your interpretation of the text? The International Institute of Theology and Anointed Life Internship International exists because we chose option two. We choose option two. If all of these guys are experiencing the same thing in the text, and we are not, then it is highly likely they know something that we do not. And so, we chose, question your interpretation of the text. The rest of the world has chosen to fit it within their limited intelligence. Many Christians have been shaken by atheists, agnostics, other religions, scientists who have come out fitting the text within their limited intelligence and judged it, even calling it stories, as holy brother Norman just put in it in the chat, without relative significance, because you have assumed your intelligence to be great, and the only thing you have stepped into is the arrogance of your ignorance, the arrogance of your ignorance. We took, we chose option two. Then the interpretation of this text is not accurate. Covenant is the same. Covenant is, it works. And we have allowed Western perspectives to whitewash, to wash it down to nothing, what a covenant is. And we take the Western idea of covenant and apply it to the Bible. And what has happened? We are reading a text, not experiencing what these guys experience, because we are not framed. I can confidently assert, having done the research with the research behind me, with the experiments behind me, that this Bible makes perfect sense. The covenant works perfectly. If you're not seeing results, it is not God. It is something that you do not understand. Our research verifies this to be practical, verifies it to be true, verifies it to be functional. And that's why you'll notice that whilst everybody online is having doctrinal wars, Anointed Life does not get involved in that. And that's why you don't see me arguing with religious or any denominational, any denominational circle, because scientists do not argue with philosophers. Have you ever seen a Quantum physicist sit down and argue with a philosopher? Anybody seen that? Those are two different worlds. One is based on verifiable information, the other is not. Nikola Tesla was a counterpart to Albert Einstein. Do you know that Nikola Tesla chastised Albert Einstein openly, even on, this is not, this is not even taught in Western culture. They reverence Albert Einstein. Why is Albert Einstein reverenced? Because he is a theoretical physicist, was a theoretical physicist, somebody who sits and does experiments in the mind. How many of us hearing that for the first time? Whilst Nikola Tesla was an experimental physicist, and Tesla and Einstein never agreed. Tesla came across the papers in the US a few times, chastising and criticizing Einstein. He told him he is, he lives in his imagination, and science must be verified. Today, you have alternating current electricity because of Nikola Tesla. Today, you have Wi-Fi and your phone that functions on Wi-Fi from the research of Nikola Tesla. Some of, I wouldn't even say a lot, but some of his science theories have been proven to be, to be wrong. That is not publicized. But all of his experiments were all in his imagination. They never agreed. I'm using that to say that when you're stepping into covenant, if God calls the laws of physics covenant, I am encouraging you from today to actually frame this covenant in our new, in our modern world, using our verbiage. Stop being a theoretical physicist and start being, or let me put it, let me state it differently. Stop, cease and desist from being a theological physicist and start being a spiritual physicist. Does that make sense? I'm saying that again. Cease and desist from being a, a theological physicist, somebody who, who does nothing but just plays with the dynamics of doctrines in his mind, and start being a spiritual physicist. And he will do what Moses did. He will do what Jesus did. He will do what the apostles did. You will do what Elijah did. The prophets did. That mindset, is that making sense? Cease and desist.

And so, when we come to covenant, I'm seeing all of that to say that this series, not even a series, this coaching intensive, I've done so many series that I'm seeing series. This coaching intensive is actually designed to identify where you are, take you out from in many different layers, to take you out of the, the theoretical world and bring you back to covenant, bring you back to spiritual physics, and understand that your covenant, therefore, is a, your covenant, therefore, is a manual to your spiritual physics. And your Bible should not be seen as a book of doctrine anymore, unless you are speaking about the doctrine of physics. Your Bible should be seen as a manual of physics, a manual of spiritual physics. If God's call, if go, if what we call laws of physics today, the prophets call covenants, God's covenants, then what if the Bible that you're holding into your hand, whilst the Western world has identified a few laws of physics, what if the Bible that you hold into your hand, every word of God is an expression of a law of physics? Is this making sense? If, let's say that again. If everything in the Bible, if everything that we call laws of physics, the Bible calls covenant, then your Bible is not no longer to be seen as a book of doctrine and philosophies and ways of seeing things. No, it is a book. If the same God that spoke the word and every word took the form of what we call laws of physics, then that by, that is a compilation of words spoken by God, is not a book of doctrine or philosophical doctrine. It is a book of physics. And you may very well have, in the form of compilation, a book that teaches you more laws of physics than the whole Western world has come to knowledge of, than the whole Western world has come to the knowledge of. You start treating the word of God as physics and mechanical, and you are stepping into a different realm. That's my first point. So, this, this coaching program, just to review what I just said, this coaching program, therefore, is designed to remove you from the abstract realm and to come into the concrete realm and understand that covenant is your manual to spiritual physics, and the spiritual realm is not abstract, it is of substance.

My second point, before we start here, is also to make something clear. Another point, very clear. What is covenant, and why does a covenant exist? Before I just mentioned that the Prophet Jeremiah refers to what we call laws of physics as covenants. Many persons have tried to invalidate covenant. One of the things that they tried to do is also, is also invalidate legalism. We live in a world where Western doctrine has actually created a posture in believers where believers run from legalism. How many of us could say that you see that or you may have come from that? Yeah. So, let's put this into perspective. Do you know that every law of physics is legalism at work? Think about it. Move the gears on that statement. If your laws of physics was not functioning by a form of legalism, you cannot trust the [Laughter] creation. If the laws of nat, did not function by legalism, you would not be able to trust anything in it. My point is, in general, is this. If gravity was not functioning in its own legalism, according to the principle of legalism, you would not be able to trust whether you should go outside or not. If, if the flower that you have in your backyard or in a garden did not stick to its own nature, legalistically, you would not know if that, if that flower would just give you a fragrance, or if that, if that flower would attack you and kill you. You wouldn't know whether to trust your dog. You wouldn't know whether to trust the fly. Nature is legalism at work. That legalism causes you to trust it. What's the definition of legalism? Let's give you a, let's put up a definition. Well, as a matter of fact, I encourage you to, to look at the dictionary, because if I come off the screen here, I don't want to take the screen off. So, so feel free to post your definition of legalism in the chat. Next question again, is legalism relative or absolute? You tell me. What about gravity? What about gravity? Is it relative? Yeah. Thank you very much, holy sisters Joyce and holy sister Lisa. Ho, sister Joy, ped strict literal or excessive conformity to the law or to religious or moral code, institutional legalism. Well, that's Western. It's institutional legalism that restricts free choice. But let's look, let's look at the principle involved in the statements, right? Strict literal or excessive conformity to one's nature. You could say that the barking of a dog, therefore, is legalism at work. Yeah. Legalism, institutional legalism. Let's put the legalizing of nature that restricts free choice. Yeah. If it is restricting free choice, it's adhering to law. Is that not legalism? You see how, you see how your brain starts to go to cognitive dissonance there already? Why? Because we have taken what God has created and given it, given it, and has given it our subjective and therefore relative definition and deemed it evil. When there's nothing under the sun that is evil. The only thing that is evil is when one uses their own reference point to define the creation, when one uses creation to compare to other creation to arrive at definition. Is this not coming into perspective for relative and absolute? So, whilst you run from legalism, nature is functioning by legalism. It is because you are not legalistic with your own nature that you are sick, that you have mental health issues. You run from the whole concept of legalism, and it puts you in a space where you are not even disciplined to your own nature. You have put yourself in a space where you have found yourself betraying your own spirit, a traitor to your own spirit. You are transgress, a transgressor to your own spirit. And so, all of creation around you is showing what you, what, showing you what you are running from. Strict adherence to mankind is the only being in the creation that is not strict, that is not strictly adhering to its own nature. If the cloud did what you did, you will be afraid. If the water in the sea or in your pipe did what mankind is doing, not being legalistic and sticking to its own nature, you will be afraid to open your pipe because you do not know what to expect. Do you know that your own trust in God is a fruit of your own betrayal in yourself? Is this making any sense? Legalism all around you. What mankind did was use legalism for validation that is uneasy, our minds unstable. Then unstable is an understatement. Unstable is an understatement. Stability means discipline to a reference point, discipline to your own nature. And every time we listen to an outside source, we have betrayed our spirit. So you don't trust yourself. Hence, you cannot trust God. Why do you think Jesus says, don't those who don't forgive shall not be forgiven? It is not because God in heaven is not going to forgive you. God out in the sky is not going to forgive you if you don't forgive, like a transaction or a repercussion. No, God is in you. If you can't forgive, then you are setting a precedent in your own spirit, and you are not going to be able to believe that God is good to forgive you. Therefore, who is controlling your God's forgiveness? You. So, let's, let's put us into perspective here. If you can't, Jesus says, forgive so that you could be forgiven. If Yahweh, if believing in Yahweh is what the Covenant of Moses was based on, therefore, one must believe that they, the bloodline of Yahweh, okay? If that is the case, then Jesus is actually speaking about reproducing after your own kind. So, what he's saying is, if you posture your spirit to be not forgiven, then your own spirit cannot believe in forgiveness because you are not forgiving. Is that making any sense? Therefore, you are controlling whether God forgives you by what you believe. And you could only believe what you do. So, what if we frame that, and we now look at what you have, what you are, what you are not experiencing with God is because of you. This is not condemnation. This is to show that you are not legalistic with your own nature. And so, you do even trust yourself. For you to trust God, you are reproducing unfaithfulness or a lack of trust after your own kind. The creation, all, all around you, shows strict and uncompromising. It is a revelation of strict and uncompromising adherence to its nature. It never compares itself to another creation. It functions within, within its own right. Whilst you are looking around the creation, technically, you could say that if you compare yourself to the creation, the presence of creation itself is revealing your lack of adherence to your own nature. What do you, what do you think King Solomon was referring to when he says, wisdom is crying out in the streets, on the corner, on the rooftop, on the, on the hill, on the mountain, at the gates of the city? Wisdom is crying out. The creation is a revelation of God's wisdom. What is that wisdom? Adherence to its nature. It does not come out of its nature. And that in itself is a voice. Every time you watch the, every time you watch the rain, it is a voice to you, crying out to you to come back, because you comparing yourself with all kind of different things, from money to possessions, societal, societal validation, social status, religious status, doctrinal criteria, doctrinal validation, having a wife, having a husband, that's me. You have trillions of creation to choose from and concepts based on comparison, creation to choose from. And the, and the wisdom in the creation is calling out to you. Paul says in the New Testament, all creation awaits the manifestation of the sons of God. Awaits who? The manifestation of the sons, the sons that will come back to being legalistic within themselves. So, whilst we criticize legalism, do you know that Moses built the covenant, built ceremonies and rituals as his, as the mechanism? We call it legalism because we viewing it through validation. Moses used these mechanisms, created a covenant so that mankind could come into, to reveal how, n, your works, covenant reveals how, n, your works, ceremonies in the temple, what we call, what we call, um, seasons and cycles with trees, fruits and vegetables, animals reproducing, they call them cycles. In the covenant, Moses used ceremonies. What you're looking at is routines. A spirit can only be identified by its routine. You understand a mango tree because it's a mango tree because of its routine. You understand rain because of its routine. You understand how clouds are formed. Covenant reveals how nature works. Yes. And the covenant that was given to Israel was what Moses used to bring you back to your routine, to the routine that belongs to your spirit. Covenant was never legalistic. We learned that in Western culture. Covenant was used by Moses to reveal how the nature of Yahweh works in man. Hence, the ceremonies and the rituals, changing the bread every morning, fresh bread every morning, lighting your candles on the menorah, fresh, in essence, he's doing that on a daily basis. We call it a ceremony, it's called rituals because your spirit has a nature. And the nature reveals itself in a, it reveals itself in a routine. Hence, covenant. Why am I even speaking about this? Because for most of us, we have been taught covenant from a very, very, very unhealthy perspective. And most of us came out from religion that taught us that legalism is bad and evil, not because it is, it's because you were taught legalism to the lens of using legalism to pursue validation. And so, it was oppression to you instead of life. If you use legalism to your nature, from the already validated nature, you would realize that legalism will save your life. Most people have not accomplished their prophecies because they have not legally stick enough to the prophecies, not for validation, not legalistic in the context of of creating a life routine that gets them, which is a plan, an executable plan, discipline to that plan to get to the fulfillment of their prophecies. They say, why is my prophecies not being fulfilled? Because you, you think free will is a blessing. God never gave anybody free will. Your thoughts are supposed to be the reflection of your nature. Free will is when you choose to use other creation and generate thoughts using other natures, and you are, and you are suffering as a result of that. Is this making any sense? So, of an, therefore, now I'm going to read this article so that you get a better idea. I wrote up, I wrote this and I posted it on Patreon. So, let me read it here for you so that I just take everything I just said there and bring it into its correct perspective.

And we read many, many amongst the Christian body today have been groomed directly or indirectly into the idea that mind renewal is independent of covenant education. In fact, if you ask the average follower of Christ, of Christ today, to detail what a New Covenant is, they would not be able to even begin to articulate what it is, nor what the covenantal identities are, nor what the responsibilities of the New Covenant are. They are not even aware that following Christ is a covenantal commitment. It is, to the average believer, not important. If this is the perception that you have found yourself in, I assure you that this, that this is not the case. Now, I'm reading this article verbatim that I've, that I've written here. In fact, there can be no mind renewal without a covenant, no mind renewal without a covenantal frame. Unfortunately, fortunately, this is not the common idea in our Western culture, because most have been and still are being introduced into life in Christ in our, in our modern world without covenant. Instead, they are guided through a sinner's prayer, and then they live a life where their pre-existing priorities and ambitions remain the same, and Jesus was used as a mere moral compass to validate moral excellence. So, making sense so far? All right. We continue. As a result of this, if we take a look around, we have a powerless church and community that are in suffering and plagued by death. Covenant, on the other hand, which is the mechanism that is used in the scriptures, is not just a contract, as it is, as is understood in the Western world. Everything that is used in the scriptures are mechanisms provided to outsiders of the garden that represent a principle or a function inside of the garden. Let me reread that. Everything that is used in the scriptures are mechanisms provided to outsiders of the garden that represent a principle or a function inside the garden. If the Western world understood this, they would not be suffering as they are. Covenants are seen as legal mechanisms of agreement to those outside of the garden, which is where most people get the idea of legalism, which I would like to frame here is, you could say, unhealthy or dead legalism. There's dead, living legalism, and there's living legalism, dead works and good works. So, so here we go. Covenants are seen as legal mechanisms of agreement to those outside, outside of the ground, outside of the garden. But it may be useful for you to know that Moses was given the mechanism of covenant by God, who used covenants to mirror the law of the nature of man inside of the garden, to live from this, from his own spirit, with the same consistency of a law of physics. Let me read that again. It may be useful for you to know that Moses was given the mechanism of covenant by God, who used covenants to mirror the law of the nature of man inside of the garden, to live from his own spirit, with the same consistency of a law of physics, which is good legalism. In other words, for example, pay attention. A lion lives from his own spirit. Because of this, his body develops the way it does, his roar is consistent, and he walks, runs, and hunts the way he does by the law of nature inherent in him. He lives from his own spirit, or lives expressing his spirit and his nature, just like gravity never changes. You can say that just like gravity is named a law or principle of physics, so the nature of the lion, or any other animal, is their inherent law of physics. Is that making sense to everybody so far? Need everybody responding there. Is that making sense so far? All right. Okay. So, we continue. Where does covenant come in? You may ask. If one day the lion, for some strange reason, stops living like a lion and starts comparing himself to a wolf, howling, running like a wolf, walking like a wolf, sitting, scratching, and hunting like a wolf, you can see that the lion has abandoned his own spirit. So, let me, let me repeat that. If one day the lion, for some strange reason, stops living like a lion and starts comparing himself to a wolf, howling, running like a wolf, walking like a wolf, sitting, scratching, and hunting like a wolf, you can't see that the lion has abandoned his own spirit, his own nature, and has broken his own law of physics. Everybody clear on that so far, right? So, he's comparing himself to other creation. He's comparing himself to a wolf, and therefore, he's abandoned his nature. Okay, lovely. This would be a monumental concern. Why would this be a monumental concern? This would be a monumental concern because if the lion begins to compare himself to a wolf, and a lion begins to, to have the characteristics of a wolf and reveal the person and the nature of a wolf, then if that law of physics is broken, then you have no reason to question if gravity could stop working too. Yes or no? Therefore, that's a monumental concern. Would you, would you not agree? Yes. Okay. Do you know that this is what the Bible refers to as an abomination? When a law of physics is broken? Well, let's continue. This monumental concern is what the scriptures call sin and an abomination. If the lion was in fact a self-determining entity, just like you have the power of self-determination, if the lion was in fact a self-determining entity, as the Adam was created to be, God would use a covenant to get the lion's self-determination to commit to his own spirit again and return to living from it exclusively. Let me read that again. Why covenant? If the lion was in fact a self-determining entity, as the Adam was created to be, God would use a covenant to get the lion's self-determination to commit to his own spirit again and return to living from his own spirit exclusively. The covenantal identity would be called lion. The perspective and nature of the lion would be called the promises of the lion. The, the purpose of the lion in the ecosystem of the, of nature would be called the anointing of the lion. The covenant, therefore, is what would provide the lion with everything that he needs to make his self-determination exclusive, or set apart, or holy, onto being a lion again, with the.

Commitment to never break the Covenant, which will be the same as saying the commitment to never considering imitating other animals again, also known as not breaking my own law of physics. Is that making sense, everybody? Type "sense."

You can say that the lion believing in the promises of the lion and acting upon it is called faith in lion. Believing in being a lion, and it is counted onto the lion as righteousness. Righteousness means he is working again how he was designed to function. He is back to being a lion, self-determining or self-existent according to his own spirit. This is what Covenant is in the Bible for everyone that lived in them, and for you and I today.

The Garden of Eden indicates that the title given to man's spirit is Yahweh. Covenant is meant to do for you what it does for the lion in the analogy. That is to commit to your own name, spirit, and NAA Yahweh, Yeshua as a law of physics. The covenantal identity is the Lord Yeshua. The promises of Elohim of God are the divine nature of Yahweh or divine nature of Yeshua that you are. And your purpose in hierarchy of creation is called your anointing.

The Covenant, therefore, is what provides you with everything that you need to make your self-determination exclusive, or set apart, or holy unto being Yahweh, Lord Yeshua, as your as a species with the commitment to never break the Covenant, which would be the same as saying the commitment to never consider imitating other creation again. The commitment to never choosing false Elohim or external priorities again. Does that bring everything that we just sent here tonight into its culmination?

So, let's get back to the question: Is legalism evil? Absolutely not. Legalism for the purpose of validation is an evil, which is why people suffer. Legalism to your nature that is already approved and validated by God will keep you in eternal life. And this is why most believers are stuck because the one thing for them to adhere to the divine nature, they have demonized, or they have allowed Western Christianity to demonize the the principle. And so they are open to a hundred voices except that the voice of the nature of their own spirit, which is called Yeshua, Yahweh. And as a result, mental health issues are present, sickness is there because Covenant is designed to help you to be you, to be what you are, to bring your self-determination back to your spirit. Exactly. The the Yahweh bloodline or the Yeshua bloodline in you.

Is this making sense, everybody? How many of us hearing with everything that we said here today, how many of us could say that you heard this for the first time? And I would not be surprised because your whole Christianity is in darkness because of this lack of understanding. As a context here, as wisdom, you treated it as laws and not wisdom. All right, okay. So you need Covenant to be healthy and strong. SOS, but this is why you're here. This is why the New Covenant Intensive is necessary. Can we now say that for the first time in your life, you see that this might sound paradoxical? Could we say here that is now for the first time in your life that you realize that Covenant is what is destroying your experience? A lack of Covenant, sorry. Yes or no? A lack of Covenant is what have you straying all over the place. You're like a cell phone connecting to Wi-Fi signals a mile a minute, just every every second is a different Wi-Fi connection instead of functioning from your own spirit. And nobody knows how to fix it because nobody's identified that what the scriptures is based on, it is based on you functioning from your spirit and ceasing and desisting from taking wisdom from external spirit, external sources of wisdom, and come back to the wisdom of your spirit, which is why Christ is in you.

The gospel message has been framed: Christ in you. If you invert that simply, then Christ outside of you is your problem. Life outside of you is your problem. And if Christ is wisdom and power unto you, then if then we could see that wisdom and power outside of you is your problem. And the rectification of that problem is wisdom and and power in you, Christ in you, which is life. Christ is life, the life in you, wisdom, not. And if Jesus is wisdom, then the wisdom is never outside of you. The wisdom is is found in the nature of your own spirit.

This understanding is what resulted in our success rate where we move from 5% in spiritual manifestation when we first understood it and put it into motion. We jumped from less than 5% to at least 75% and then it increased over the last two to three years where our success rate, I could say that there's no nobody that I pray for now that doesn't really get results. And I can also say that according to the the stats that I that I have, usually the believers, and I've seen that this is a problem with Kibe Lake, Johi Lake, even Andrew Mark, they say the same thing. And I can say that I have had the same experience that believers who have been dogmatic in Christ, they are usually the ones that have a slower experience because they took legalism and applied it to the doctrine, not to God. Is that making sense?

And so helping them to come off from that and to come back to the spirit, it is why I believe that Jesus rebuked Thomas. He rebuked him because now you're using God in a diff in a false way, and you're disciplining yourself to perspectives that does not come from the name. Now, I'm not saying that believers would not get healed because I've seen believers healed, but in a lot of cases, a lot of cases, their process is slower. And sometimes I have to really help them see things from a different perspective for them to begin to see the power in their body. And many believers are trapped there because the doctrine was external wisdom, and they and they applied legalism to that. Is this making sense?

And so this coaching intensive is going to move you from where you are to understand. Yes, one changed oneself with such a rigid legalism. Yes, it is the evil neg evil legalism, not legalism that gives life. Legalism or applying legalism to your own n to never to choose to never deviate from Christ in you. You're using rules to try to get life instead of living from the life. So in this introduction, I trust that these two, these two points has actually given you something to think about. Has opened your eyes as to why you're struggling. Exactly who this stud s. Well said, well said. Why you need to open your eyes.

And for those of you who have come from dogmatic, from from dogmatic experiences where you've been, you've been tricked into not releasing the dogmatic experience for fear of you losing your salvation, I trust that today's discussion has has actually stop, has actually given you a sense of liberation from that. And for you to see just in normal, practical, logical approach to scripture and to the dynamics of scriptures, to the mechanisms of scriptures, that it is a dogmatic approach to external wisdom that has been your problem. And your Covenant is designed to bring you back to the liberty of an internal wisdom according to the nature of the spirit that you are, of according to the wisdom of the garden that your spirit, mind, imagination, and heart is now.

This introduction was not meant to be this. What what we spoke about here, what we just spoke about here today was not the topic planned for today, right? Where have I been? I have been conducting experiments. I have been experiencing the Covenant to be able to bring it. You will almost fear losing yourself, yet you will become your true self 100%. That statement that you just made there, holy Sister Lisa, tells me that you understand what we have covered here today. You understand. Yeah. So, um, my intention to speak here, or what I was intended to speak on here today, I will make next week's conversation. Before we even touch anything on presentations, these are concepts that we need to sit down and to be ruminate on. These are concepts that we need to sit down and be true to ourselves with, or else a covenant will do nothing for you. You have to identify where you have been.

Today's conversation or discuss or yeah, today's conversation was meant to be surrounding the difference between Western understanding of contract and the biblical understanding of Covenant, which are two different universes. I will save that discussion for next Wednesday. I strongly encourage you, um, I strongly encourage you if you think that today was eye-opening. I strongly encourage you to do not miss next week and to come with your heart open because when we break down and show you the difference between what you understand a contract is in the Western culture, Greek Roman culture, and what Biblical Covenant is, I am guaranteeing you 100% of you here are going to realize that is likely that you were never in the Bible. You created your own realm. But when you get it, you will never come out of God anymore. When you get it, when you see the difference and I identify and I articulate what it is, most of you, if not 100% of you, are going to come to realize that you were tricked. Some of the Bible will come into context for you, things that your mind could not wrap itself around. It's a simple concept, a very simple concept that Western Christian theology locked you out of. I can safely say before we even speak about next week, you will realize how much of Western Christianity that is primarily based on the pursuit of validation is satanic to its core. And how you were kept at the door wanting God, but could never walk in God because of a simple, a simple concept that next week's sessions will make, will make very clear for you.

For today, this is our introduction, and I encourage you to ruminate on it. Shall we now proceed with our orientation for the next 16 weeks? Everybody ready for the rest of the orientation? We just take a few minutes to do this, and then we wrap it up here tonight, right? So I will.