The Epstein Files Have Been DELETED

Trapmore gang. We've been having a whole bunch of fun with the Epstein files over the past couple of days, over the past couple of weeks. It's been wild. And apparently the fun is now over. Okay.

The Department of Justice are apparently backtracking. A lot of the files are being taken down. There's rumors that the cover up is continuing. That's what some people are saying out there. Some people's opinions. I don't I don't have any opinions. I'm scared. But files are getting taken down. We're now seeing a whole bunch of things being removed from the site. Now, it seems like the state, the Justice Department are actually going to be going to war with the online investigators that have been downloading and preserving some of these files. And for whatever reason, they're taking them down. They're deleting files, and it might unfortunately be too late.

Is it possible that the Department of Justice and the FBI actually underestimated the online intelligence and research communities? It's highly possible. Okay, I was already scared. I'm even more scared now. I might have said too much. But in this video, I'm going to break down to you how the basic cover up and withdrawal of the Epstein files is happening in real time and how the investigators online in places like Reddit, in places like 4chan and beyond are basically ready to go to war with the government over the Epstein files. All right? And I'm all here for it. All right? If I had some popcorn, I'd be pulling it out right now. I'm not going to lie to you. But I'll break it all down to you in this video.

So, as you can see here, the first thing I'm going to show you, okay, this is just one of the first examples of files being deleted, and this was about 3 weeks ago now. Okay, there's apparently been a big effort to delete some files in the last couple of days, but I just want to show you and let you know that this has been going on for quite some time. They have been apparently taking down files that got a little bit too spicy, a little bit too scary. Okay, this was an example of one of the most sorted files and uh documents that I discussed in a previous video with you guys not too long ago that has apparently now already been taken down. This got taken down very quickly and I did do a video about it, so maybe I should be worried. All right, this was uh the file that related to basically where they said that um Epstein was buying and selling girls online through his emails. Okay, there were these pictures of girls that he was being sent. They've redacted the faces of the girls to be fair. Okay. But basically, am I my my headphones mad uncomfortable? That's right. Okay. Um, this basically was a file that was going around. You know, I showed you this in a previous video. He was getting sent pictures of girls that were seemingly for sale. Uh, you know, there were other emails where he had bragged essentially buying girls and buying one of his girlfriends from the east of Europe, I believe it was. Um, but basically this is now saying that the Department of Justice have deleted a series of emails from redacted persons with Epstein sending pictures of girls to be bought and sold. Right? Check in r/ Epstein for more details. This was from r/circled.

But what's interesting, okay, people were saying this is the evidence that Cash Patel said definitely didn't exist. Now look, I'm not trying to have no problem with Cash Patel, right? Seems like a fun guy. Seems like he knows how to party for sure, but it is definitely a little bit confusing. All right, it is a little bit confusing. This was pretty much a bombshell um post that was going around, okay? And it was apparently deleted. It was suddenly deleted. Things got a little bit too real and it got deleted. And there's a bunch more examples of this.

Now, what's really interesting is this is happening in the midst of the fact that basically representatives from Congress were allowed to look at unredacted files from the Epstein files. They were allowed to have a little a little opportunity to look up files and things that the public weren't allowed to see, at least without redactions. And some of those politicians have actually come out and spoken out and basically said that they're going to name people that are redacted in the files, not victims. We're talking about alleged perpetrators, co-conspirators. And one of these people uh just a few days ago on February the 24th would be Thomas Massie, who would publicly name co-conspirators that he had seen from the unredacted files, and he would accuse the government of hiding critical evidence in the Epstein files. So, let's hear what he said in this video.

>> Thank you, Madam Speaker. Congress created the Department of Justice. Congress funds the Department of Justice. And Congress is responsible for the oversight of the Department of Justice. When will we see justice? I'll tell you what I've not seen. I've not seen any arrests from the revelations in the Epstein files. Over three million documents describing horrible things, describing unspeakable things. So much of it redacted. Over two dozen people have resigned, CEOs, members of government worldwide, but I haven't seen any arrests or investigations here in the United States from this Department of Justice.

He's making a very interesting point. He's saying that there's arrests happening all around the world. We just saw Prince Andrew get arrested in the UK. Lord Mandlesson, another weird creep that was from the Epstein files, another Brit, unfortunately. we do have to claim him but you know with with no joy that I do so but there's not really much going on in the US and what he's basically explaining Thomas Massiey's basically saying the department of dust justice you know is hiding critical evidence they're protecting people and the fact that a lot of these files are now being removed suddenly it does kind of support that theory and I think that the members of Congress are actually pissed they're angry they're upset that we're seeing you know even accountability coming in other countries but the United States is a different Prince Andrew, Duke of York, who has since been stripped of his royalty, his royal titles due to his affiliation with Jeffrey Epstein, has been arrested. Peter Mandlesson, who previously served as UK's ambassador to the United States, resigned in disgrace from United Kingdom's House of Lords and the Labor Party, and he's been arrested. Former prime minister of Norway Torbjorn Yagland has been charged, but we don't see any charges, arrests, or investigations in the United States. What do we see? We see our FBI director celebrating in the locker room at the Olympics overseas. It's fine to be proud of this country, but we should be proud of this country because we have a system of justice that works. And yet we do not. Who are the men that should be investigated? I'll name them right here. Leon Black. You don't even have to see past the redactions to see that this man needs to be investigated. Jess Staley accused of terrible things. It's right there in the files. Why is he not being investigated? and Leslie Wexner. Why did the FBI list him as a co-conspirator in their own documents in a child sex trafficking case and then tell him according to him that they had no questions for him. Why is that? Well, the Epstein Files Transparency Act requires the DOJ and the FBI to disclose to us their internal memos and emails about how they made those decisions whether to prosecute or not prosecute. Yet, they have not delivered those memos. And we still don't have the memos and documents and emails from 2008 to explain why Jeffrey Epstein was given such a light sentence in what would have been an open andsh shut case of child sex trafficking which allowed him to go back and recommmit these terrible crimes, create hundreds of more victims and ensnare so many other people in his conspiracy. Where are those documents that describe those decisions? We need justice. We want the Department of Justice to get to work and that's what they need to do now.

So members of Congress are pretty furious, right? They're saying why, you know, I agree. Why hasn't Leslie Wexner been like, okay, we saw him giving his testimony the other day, but realistically, they said in the in the files he was a co-conspirator. Why has there not been a serious investigation? I mean, hey, there's been an investigation, but it it went a certain way, right? People are furious. People are furious in the comments. Okay. When exposing a crime is treated as committing a crime, you are being ruled by criminals. Oh, no. All right. If I can be fired for receiving tips at my retail job, it should be illegal for politicians to receive gifts from lobbyists. It's insane. Okay.

And more coverage has been coming out basically saying that, you know, the Department of Justice is actively burying the evidence in the Epstein files. You know, there's files that have gone missing. They've realized, oh [ __ ] oh, we shouldn't have put that up there. Let's take it down. It's too late. It's too late. They are scrambling. I'll give you my honest opinion. You want me to give you my honest opinion before I play you this next clip? Let me just give you my honest opinion. Okay, this is no disrespect. I hope I don't get any any trouble by saying this. I think that perhaps there are senior people that wanted the Epstein files maybe smoothed over a little bit. Maybe they gave the orders. I'm going to say this very sensitively. Maybe they gave the orders to smooth certain things over. maybe just make things a little bit better, a little bit easier for some people. I think some of the people at the bottom, some of the people who were tasked with this awful job of smoothing some stuff over, I think they knew. And that's why I think we've seen files that are look redacted, but you can copy and paste them into a word document and you can see what's under the redactions. I think that's why we've seen files come out and then they've said, "Whoops, bring them back." I think the people at the bottom are upset and are angry with what they're being asked to do. And I think it's very very possible that they've botched the release of these files on purpose to make it difficult for whatever angle anybody wanted to spin on this to deliver on. And I think as the years go by, we're only going to see more and more crazy stuff come out with these files. That's all I'm going to say. Okay, that's all I'm going to say. That's my genuine opinion, right? But let me just show you a little bit more coverage about how the Department of Justice is apparently losing it when it comes to how this evidence is being >>

There are growing questions this hour about dozens of records that appear to be missing from the Epstein files. According to a CNN review, those records in question are FBI witness interviews, and three of the missing interviews are related to a woman who accused both Jeffrey Epstein and President Trump of sexually assaulting her decades ago. The top Democrat on the oversight committee is among those expressing concern. >> I went to the DOJ file search room yesterday to look for these documents that are in the manifest document, and they should be in there, and they're not there. These documents relate to a survivor that has made serious allegations about the president. >> What's important now is that the DOJ explain to us why were those documents removed? >> CNN's Cara Scanell joins us now. So Cara, what more do we know about the specifics of these documents? >> Well, Erica, the CNN investigative team have taken a look into these records and they found that there are dozens of files that are missing. And the way that they were able to do this is they looked at the serial numbers that were on an evidence log provided to Epstein's accomplice, Glenn Maxwell, and being looking at those serial numbers discovered that there were dozens of them missing. I mean, there were >>

So, I just want to make one thing clear. I think that, as I said before, I think that it's possible that the authorities really underestimated the kind of open source intelligence community and they really didn't realize just how savvy some of these people are. You know, they're looking at serial numbers of a manifest of documents related to the Jula Maxwell trial and then they're cross referencing it against these Epstein files in the FBI records and they're noticing things are missing. You got to be a smart cookie to work that out. I wouldn't have worked that out on my own. Okay, I'm one step behind. I'm not saying I don't know anything. I'm a big dummy on YouTube. I don't know what's going on. I just read Reddit comments. That's what they would say. You're just a Reddit you're just a Reddit reaction channel. Okay, I don't know nothing. But this community of researchers so so savvy, there's nothing that can really get by them. And I think whoever is responsible for these redactions, I think unfortunately for them, they underestimated how savvy this community was. And I don't think anybody is ever going to forget that certain things haven't been seen. I know what I'm like. If I'm doing a video about some kind of hip-hop history and I hear, "Oh, there's a video of this guy doing this back in the day and it's lost media." Trust me? I will do anything I can to go and find that clip. And I think these guys, they care even more.

>> These all relate to 302s. That's the FBI form for witness interviews. And there are 325 included on that list, but there are 90 of them missing. And within those 90 that are missing, includes three from a woman who said that she was sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein going back to when she was as young as 13 years old. and she also made an allegation that she was sexually assaulted by Donald Trump in the 1980s. Now, we went to the White House with this. They said that these are false allegations and it's just sensationalist. Uh the Justice Department said that they have not deleted any documents and that they said that if there are documents that are not on the public website, that's either because they were duplicates, privileged, or part of an ongoing investigation. We have seen with the release of these records on the public website that sometimes documents are there. They're >>

So they're saying look any documents that were missing they were duplicates, right? Maybe they weren't. You know, they're part of an ongoing investigation. Now, that's the scariest part. If they're saying, look, the reason these documents aren't included cuz they're part of an ongoing investigation. Well, who's being investigated currently? They should be scared. They should be very worried.

Now, what I want to show you, and this is actually quite scary for me, is on February the 6th, 2026. So that's over 20 days ago now. Right at the start of the month, there would actually be a warning posted on r/ Epstein and it urged researchers to be extremely careful, extremely careful and cautious about what they were sharing on the Epstein subreddit. This is a big problem. And there was basically somebody explained something in there that was very very dark and they got in trouble and accounts were getting allegedly deleted. It is very dark. So this is a post on r/p said be careful what you post on here. Right. And this was a post that somebody made and I'm scared. I don't want to point the finger at anyone, especially no big dogs. But people were saying they noticed that the word don't, whether don't d apostrophe t do d o n space t do o n space capital t were automatically always redacted. The word don't was always redacted. And people were saying, "Why would the word D Why would the word D be automatically redacted from the files?" I don't know. I don't know. Probably just a mistake. Um, it says, "As many of you know, we know Maxwell was a large Reddit moderator on some of the biggest subreddits here." I could I could cover that in a whole other video if you want. It said, "If Maxwell could have such a large influence on Reddit, who knows what's going on in this subreddit. Some of Epstein's friends may be watching every post, and they may be posting themselves, too." In the image above, this guy expose some potential of DOJ redacting that that the big dog the Dante name in all the files. Their account has also been deleted from Reddit and or banned from this sub at least 3 hours ago from the time I'm making this post. We don't really know why they are gone, but they are more so. Some days ago, someone posted Epstein's email login and suddenly the email was flooded with hundreds of people. We don't know who could have gotten into the account, but maybe they deleted some emails, changed some things up, and it wouldn't be detected because so many people logged in. Another thing is that it could have been planned. People on that post noted how strange the account which was posted it was. Hang on, that don't make sense. People on that post noted how strange the account which posted it was, replying to comments with a different account. We truly have no idea of the scope or how deep it goes. We need to be diligent in our posts, and I feel like I'm taking a risk even making this post. I don't want to get anonymously contacted with my address or anything with threats, hence why I'm using a VPN right now. But maybe I'm being paranoid. I don't know. I just wanted to say be careful what you post or I fear that they're watching. Right. It said, "Hey, well, if any of them are reading, go [ __ ] yourself. These guys are fearless." Says Reddit is removing any uh Reddit is removing threats to any of Epstein's associates. Mine just got pulled from this thread, so I'll say again. I actively daydream of sending his associates to the Goolag. Let's just say or I don't want to get in trouble. He said, "Yeah, they're everywhere. I do suggest people nowadays if they're going to work heavy on this. Need to use a VPN. It's that bad." All right. I need a VP. I need a fresh VPN sponsor for this. I got temporary banned for saying stuff that may have offended the PDFs. I stand on that and I think Reddit moderators are ridiculous. I don't get why saying child rword and murder is a crime that deserves the worst type of punishment is controvers. Right. But it says there's more of us than them. There's nothing to fear. Get it all out there.

So, when it comes to the topic of the files being covered up, deleted, removed, etc. being scrubbed, this is a very interesting post on r/conspiracy. One user built a comprehensive database to actually host the leaked files, especially the videos, and it mysteriously was taken down almost immediately. All right, it said Epstein video site and it said full catalog of Epstein video files are out. video index thousands 1,994 total video files that were being archived and cataloged on this new website right immediately deleted instantly gone instantly deleted deleted in a matter of hours OP even deleted their account and posted this message now this was the original message when they posted it said exit cipher here it is done thanks to everyone for your support this is the first step in the project is done it's a fully scanned and categorized video browser with search functionality and extension filtering. It has all of the valid videos that I filtered through the search results with the help of a sniffer. It has 1,994 videos with 1,154 of them being AVI. Most of the AVI files are shorter than 1 seconds. They're snippets of same recordings. So, it's not playable in most of the player except VLC, which you can see in the frame. But not all AVA files are corrupt, right? Wow. Wow. So, this is what they posted. They deleted their account. Said everyone I know website is showing all blank. This is unfortunately the end of my little project due to circum circumstances certain circumstances. I had to take it down. Thank you everyone for supporting me in my effort. They said bro do not leave us like this. What the f happened? Edit. His account is deleted as well. What the f does that mean? Gone. Your video library has already been taken down. That's actually kind of scary. And then this is a follow-up. They said they had to delete their profile because they're being tracked and followed. I am not joking. I DM'd the original poster. They were threatened. I guess I'm next. He said the threats are way beyond what he can share. I urge all of us to proceed with caution because what the f edit. Use code speak when discussing this and please tell everyone you know to do so. Epstein. I don't even know who that is. Whatever. And those who DM'd me have seen the screenshot where he took his profile down because he couldn't continue. I'm not sharing it with everyone. But everyone exercise caution. What the hell? To be a whistleblower, you must have absolutely nothing to lose, including your life. Um, I'm scared. I am scared. I'm scared. Um, so they don't want us to see anything curated to be able to beast this all together. They're saying this is exactly what happened with that story about coming across those buses on some property and the driver handed the guy a business card. All the names on the card traced back to some shady people. They shut down everything. What the hell? Jesus Christ. It's effing real. Save and share. Oh no. Oh no. Should I click this link? I'm scared. Should I click this link? Is it archived? Oh, I'm scared. I'm actually too scared. I'm I'm too scared. I'm too scared. I'm too scared. I'm too scared. What? It says if you pull the HTML from the page and grab all the links for each video which look like this, then you can truncate. Uh anyway, says, "Has no one yet set up an AI agent to scrape the justice site and build a timeline of people in the photos, matching with discussions in emails and trying to piece together when predators are being redacted from the photos rather than victims? What the hell? What the hell?" It said, "I tested one video file on the Justice site and it worked. I had to rename PDF to MP4 and edited data sheet year. It's better to compress these files in RA and upload all the stuff on OC for everyone instead of using an open website. Edit. A script is now running. Searching for hidden video files named as PDF. Please be patient. I'll inform you. All right. They didn't expect these coders and these hackers to be able to run scripts and be able to pull down the entire thing and and re-upload it elsewhere. I'm honestly scared. I should stop. It says mods have taken down the whole post now. We're witnessing crazy stuff happening in real time. It's insane. They're saying pizza gate 2.0. This is 5 billion times worse than Pizza Gate. Pizza Gate 1.0. This is Pizzagate. Every accusation is an admittance. And look at the people who push pizza gate. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Dudes, don't use Americanbased servers for this stuff. Create copies in many crow uh cloud providers. Please share with foreign news reporters. Isn't listen limited to America or Americans. You should have open sourced the whole repository from the start and seeded it to torrent. Uh Godspeed brothers is crazy times to watch out for each other. Watch this for a little laugh. I don't even want to click. I'm not clicking any more links on this thread. That's crazy. The comments are weird on their own. Blocked history, suspicious comments. I'll say this. Don't keep these files on your computer. Don't view them on your personal computer or your cell phone. It's a trap in of itself. Be careful. This is a setup within a setup. Right. Wait, wait, wait. I don't know why I keep getting downvoted every time I post it. If you go to the push a T file and copy the redactions, it gives you Trump's speech about Haitians in Springfield. I believe this is an attempt from someone to give an from the inside to give Trump a middle finger. Not happening for me. Someone caught wind of it and it stopped. It doesn't work. All right. All right. We're going to move on. We're going to move on to another post. But that is super creepy. All right.

So, now we're seeing highly upvoted posts covering the leaks mysteriously disappearing straight from Reddit's front page. So, look at this that was going on, right? This was posted in r/pstein. It says, "So, everyone else is seeing all the front page popular post about Epstein getting deleted, right? cuz obviously moderation is required for healthy online communities and keeping things on topic, but this obviously isn't that. The censorship is crazy. What should be done about it? So, they're saying that post about the Epstein files. They're making it to the front page of Reddit and they're instantly getting deleted. Too many people are seeing it. People saying it's no surprise. It's Reddit to CC user. Is that Maxwell? CC user Maxwell Hill. Jane Maxwell was a Reddit mod and the first Redditor ever to reach a million karma points. Who knew that? That's crazy. People were saying they want they want proof of that. It's all over the internet. His s No way. No way. Wait. Deleted. That's her. This is Shellane Maxwell. Redditor of the day. Locked post. She was They deleted the post. Sorry. It's been removed by moderators. That's Maxwell's Reddit account. Hello everyone. Thank you for inviting me to be Redditor of the day. This is 16 years ago. That the ironic timing is just I don't want to get into it. Hello everyone. Thanks for inviting me to be the Redditor of the day. I'm honored indeed. I'll try try my very best to answer everyone's questions. How does it feel to have the most link karma on Reddit? What do you think about the recent bogus, in my opinion, claims of Reddit power users? Oh my god. This is Jalain Maxwell. This is Jane Maxwell. Jala Maxwell said, "Thanks. It feels good to find uh to the most link karma, but not many people know that. There isn't much feels good to have the most link karma. She has the highest karma. There isn't much excitement or competition nowadays since Reddit admin stopped publishing the rating of the top 10 Redditors daily, weekly, and all time. The claim of power users is really misleading cuz the mods are really trying to control the amount of spam on their subreddits. They're not trying to present legit prevent legit submissions from being voted up if they're interesting to users in order to push their own links. Edit. I think I should explain a little more explain a little more on here why some users claim there are Reddit power users. This was because it asserted that a mod could use his position to ban certain links and promote his own links for some financial gain. There appears to be some conflict of interest as the mod is now in a position of power to dictate submissions to a subreddit to suit themselves. But quite honestly, the number of users in a large subreddit meant that you can't really get your own post to the front page if users don't like it. And it's no matter how many posts you try and ban as a mod, and it would be so obvious to other mods that they would stop you from doing so. So, this notion of power users is not true. Excuse me, I'm getting cold. Um, yet there are popular users who build a large following, so they are power users, but they are positive contributors. Stop it. Stop it. Stop it. Stop it. Okay, so people you know what? I might I'm going to save this for another video. I'm actually going to save this for a whole I'm going to do a whole video on this cuz this is insane. This is actually insanity. So, let me get back to the main point of this video. I'm going to do a deep dive into into Reddit profile because I I just seen some [ __ ] I'm I'm going to save that for a whole video. I could talk about that for an hour. But ironically, okay, this is one of the most ironic things cuz this is what triggered me to do this video. Somebody actually posted in r/ Epstein about a day ago. They're all gone. All the files have been deleted or all the images have been deleted. I was in the middle of using the file extension trick to view the hidden video files for the first time. At some point, certain pages stopped working and I can only go backwards to the ones loaded. Out of frustration, I decided to decided to start over from scratch by once again typing no images produced. only this time it didn't work. I've tried multiple times to get it back. Nothing. I just saw 3,700 files removed in real time. And you might notice that I'm viewing this Reddit post as a downloaded PDF because the post itself has been removed as well. Funnily, the post has been also removed. Well, suspiciously. All right. This post has hit r/all and r/popular. Oh, but they've deleted the post. Deleted the whole post. Yeah, just as it makes it to r/all. People are saying, "Good thing there are plenty of backups, but where to find it? Someone made a Google account. You can search all the things here." That's the Jail account. You may be familiar with that where they've recreated his email. Says, "Couple thoughts. This send a signal that there's a lot of stuff in the files that were made public that the government is realizing and wanting to cover up. This should embolden existing researchers. The popular sites with files and analysis could experience DDoS attacks very soon. Hopefully, they have backups that are stored offline in local hard drives. If you're holding a local hard drive like this one, the full Epstein files, this doesn't have the Epstein files on it, by the way. This is empty. I promise this is empty. Please. Right. I'm saying please, in the words of the famous words of Kanye West, please Jay-Z, don't send them hit up my head. But that is a joke. Jay-Z's not in these files. There's nothing in this is an empty drive. I just bought this. It's an empty drive. I'm doing I'm going to do something with this. But if you did have a drive like this with the X2 files on, you might want to protect your neck. That's all I'm going to say. Okay, um, that's insane. People are saying just upvoting the [ __ ] out of everything of this post to boost relevance. See if those potential researchers whom this would serve best. People are saying, "Holy [ __ ] it's real. You can't even find Epstein's name in it." New story. Epstein never existed. Let's go look in those sweet alien files instead. Just check out the alien. We don't need the Epstein files. We got those at home. Just got the alien files. Don't need them. Forget about those files. What files? I was just reading a document, then went back to do another search, and now it's showing me the same thing. That's exactly what happened to me. Page one and five are working fine. Then for whatever reason, I couldn't go any further past page five. Then I tried doing two to four the same thing and now nothing. I literally attempted thempp4 trick for the first time 10 minutes ago only for everything to disappear after 2 minutes of research. You're cooked. You're cooked. They've made a mockery of justice for far too long. It's time to demonstrate. I'm not going to demonstrate because I'm scared. Okay, I'm actually so scared.

So basically, okay, independent tracking has reported um basically like people that are tracking these reports independently and trying to preserve them. They've claimed that the Department of Justice has already systematically deleted hundreds of documents from the public record. We don't really know whether or not these are actually backed up anywhere, whether people have backed them up. So this is on epsteinexposed.com. It says, "The Department of Justice quietly deleted 892 Epstein documents. We built a system to prove it." An independent audit uh audit of 1.38 million documents uh document hashes reveals systematic deletions, silent modifications, and a government agency that cleaned up after itself. Oh no. Oh no. Maybe it was just an accident. Maybe they just they were just self-deing files, man. Like let's just let's just let's just stay alive, man. Let's just stay out of the way. Says, "On an unknown date between 2024 and 2025, the Department of Justice removed 892 documents from its Epstein Files Transparency Act release. There was no press release, no Federal Register notice, no update in the EFA portals. The file simply stopped resolving http 404 gone. Right? We know this because independent researchers got there first. Before the deletions, Rodrigo Polo computed uh SHA256 cryptographic hashes for every single file. They're using crypto to preserve the files. Bro, you guys are cooked. But every file across 12 EFA data sets, 1.38 million documents total separately. Break 2825 was monitoring the DOJ servers and logged every HTTP response change. Together, they preserved the receipts. You guys are in trouble, man. You guys are in big trouble. It said, "We ingested all of it. Every hash, right? Sounds like it sounds like a trip to Amsterdam to me. They ingested every single hash. All right. Someone's getting smoked. every deletion record, every modification timestamp, and what we found raises questions that the DOJ has never publicly addressed. Here's the numbers. 892 documents deleted, removed from the DOJ EFTA, Epstein Files Transparency Act server with no public announcement. 32 documents modified, content was changed after initial publication across eight data sets. 1,380,911 hashes were verified. So the SHA256 hash is independently computed for every document. Surviving traces 24 fragmentaryary uh entity records. All that remains of the 892 deleted documents. Why didn't you save those documents? Right. Please what are they? Tell me. The overwhelming majority of deletions 866 of 892 or 97% came from data set 9. Oh god. What was data set 9? The remaining 26 deletions were scattered across data sets 1 2 3 8 and 10. The deleted documents span a wide range of EFTA identification numbers from EFTA45963 to EFTA 0126086. This is not a contiguous block. The deletions were selective. DOJ stated reason. They indicated that data set 9 documents were removed because they contained abuse material. Right? We're not going to get into all that. But yeah, and and that's fair. If that's the case, that's fair. If true, that removal is not only justified, but legally required under federal law. We're not disputing that justification, right? That type of material doesn't have any place in public release. We fully support its removal. But the questions remain, is this actually the fairest fairest possible response that the documents removed were actually illegal materials that you can't you can't have those. Sorry, can't have those. Good. Maybe, but why were 32 documents in other data sets silently modified if DS9 was pulled for that material? What explains content changes in data sets 2 3 4 5 6 8 and 12. These modifications were never announced or explained. Why was the deletion so thorough? When we attempted to reconstruct what was in the deleted documents, we discovered something unusual. The deletions didn't just remove PDFs from the server. They removed every document title and summary, every person to document link, every OCR text extraction, every entity extraction record, every co-occurrence relationship. Out of 892 documents that once existed in a fully indexed searchable database, only 24 fragmentaryary ev uh entity records survived. One mentions Gelain Maxwell. Other truncated names include Jeff Paggle, Laura Meningay, Bogleman Law. The rest addresses, dates, and organization code. That level of cleanup goes beyond pulling files from a web server. Someone systematically scrubbed every database table that referenced these documents. Why was there no public announcement? The Epstein Files Transparency Act was passed specifically to ensure public access to these records when the government removes 900 documents from that release. The public has a right to know even if the reason is legitimate. Okay, let us know. Modifications nobody mentioned. Beyond the 892 deletions, 32 documents across eight data sets had their content modified after initial publication. And there they are. All right, there they are. Whatever you go check out epsteppposed.com. All right, nothing to do with me. Um, apparently these were not abuse material removals. their content changes to documents in data sets the DOJ never flagged. When a government agency modifies evidence documents after publication without disclosure, it undermines the integrity of the entire release. Every researcher, journalist, and attorney working on these files needs to know whether the version they have matches the version that was originally published. Now they can check how we verified the integrity system. Today we're launching a document integrity verification system built on three independent data sources. Independent hash verification. We ingested 1.3 million SHA hashes from Rodrigo Polo's repository, independently computed cryptographic fingerprints for every Cryot file across 12 EFTA data sets. An SHA256 hash is a one-way mathematical function. Even if a single bite of a document changes, the hash changes completely. This is the same technology used to verify software downloads, blockchain transactions, and legal evidence chains of custody. That's That's a long day if you're trying to slip something out of the scary files. Every document on the site now displays its hash verification status. Verified is green shield. Document content matches its independently verified computed hash. Pending the document hasn't been verified. Mismatch red alert. The document's content has changed since the hash was computed or removed from DOJ red banner. The document was completely deleted from the government's servers. Here's a deletion and modification tracking. We ingested every deletion and modification event from BE2825's monitoring project that tracked HTTP responses from the DOJ EFTA servers over time. Each event is logged with a time stamp, the affected document ID, the date set, and the type of change. Documents that were deleted by the DOJ display a prominent red banner explaining the original was removed from the government servers and they're going to be doing continuous monitoring. An automated integrity agent checks the DOJ servers twice daily verifying a random sample of 50 documents. Once a week, it performs a deep verification on 20 high-v value documents, downloading the full PDF and commuting computing a fresh SHA 256 hash against our stored baseline. If any document disappears or changes, the system generates alert. The full methodology, data set breakdowns, and the real-time stats are available on our integrity dashboard. Oh no, do I want to look at it? I'm scared. You can download the torrent. I don't I'm scared. I'm not going to download it. The documents that were removed still existed in a torrent maintained by the same researchers who computed the hashes. We're not hosting this torrent, but its existent means deleted documents are not truly gone. They're just not long no longer available from the government that was ordered to release them. Oh boy. You can verify it yourself. You can clone it and compute these hashes. Compare them against the DOJ servers. The tools are open source. The math is deterministic. Don't trust us. You can verify, right? Bigger picture. The Epstein Files Transparency Act was passed because Congress recognized the public had a right to these records. The DOJ published three and a half million pages. Then quietly 892 of them disappeared. Maybe every one of those contained bad materials and the deletion was entirely justified. So if the DOJ just say that publicly with specificity and explain the 32 modifications in other data sets while they're at it, let me be generous to the DOJ and say what if that was the case and the modifications they were adding a quick little bit of redacting and censoring in there just to protect everybody. I hope that would be the case. But the default posture of a government agency should never be to silently alter a mandated public release. When the same agency that gave Epstein a sweetheart plea deal in 2007 removes evidence from a transparency release without public notice, the burden falls on them to explain. Not onto the public to discover it through independent cryptographic audits. We built this system because accountability should end on whether someone just happens to be watching. This is document integrity. This seems to be suggesting there is more deletions. They're now saying there is a total of 957 deletions, 32 modifications, 250 hash mismatches. Right. This is crazy. Anomalies detected. Anomalies detected in the data sets. Hash mismatches. Oh boy. All right. Um, I'm done. I'm I'm over this now. All right. I'm scared. This is enough. This is enough for me.

So clearly there are some things here that aren't supposed to be seen. Maybe we should just Maybe we should just forget. Maybe we should just forget this whole thing ever happened. You guys want to just forget this whole thing ever happened? I think we could just We could just Epstein that. Who's Jeffrey Epste? I don't know. I just want to want to chill. I just want to be a chill guy and just just be alive. That's what I want to do. This is scary, man.

So, look, clearly there's a lot of strange things going on behind the scenes. Maybe there is actually a good reason for some of these deletions. Maybe maybe the government don't owe you an explanation. After all, they're all mighty and big and powerful. I'm just a little peeon. Okay, I'm just a little peeon. Just delete Just delete anything you want. It's okay. Just delete anything you want. I don't mind. I'm just I'm just I'm scared. Little pee on.

So, let me know what you guys think down below. Do you feel like this is a cover up in action? Do you feel like they've been caught out? Do you feel like there's actually fair and reasonable, justifiable reasons for some of these deletions? Let's be real. I know it's easy to follow conspiracy theories and hate the government and hate thes and all that kind of thing. But at the same time, there are there are some genuine reasons on the table as to why they might have deleted things that are actually reason. Maybe they don't owe us an explanation. Maybe they do. I don't know. Okay, let me know what you guys think. I'm going to wrap this one up now. This one is actually a little bit spooky and covering this stuff has actually made me quite anxious. So, I'm going to just I'm just going to keep it moving. Okay, I will be back. I've got another Epstein video that I want to do today and I've also got an Elementro video that I want to do because there has been some very interesting updates when it comes to the cartels. I'll keep you guys updated on those videos. Thank you so much for watching this video and until next time, I'm out guys. Peace. Stay safe and stay out of them files, man. I'm scared.