Rupert Lowes offer to Nlgel Farage

Sirens whale. The city's plight. Shadows fall, dimming the light. Whispers grow, arising tight. Vindicator, where do you hide?

Steer is over hot blaze. Through smoky haze, he sets his gaze. Justice calls, a burning need. A city's wounds, he bows to he. From cobbled streets to tower high, Vindicator takes to the sky with fire. Defender of this pro. Standing for all to see.

>> Thousand storm. WE MARCH FOR OUR HERITAGE.

>> WITH THE DRAGON WE STAND UNITED.

Whispers turn to thunderous roar. As shadows creep.

>> March. We will win.

Born of darkest night, he ignites hope. A guiding light. STRI defender of this pro, free for all to see. Battles rage and darkness reigns. Hopes never burn within his veins. He'll never strike with fire. Defender of this pro land. Break the chain, set free for all to see. A symbol edged against the moon. Vindicator rising soon.

Look at me. There we go. Hi everybody. We're having, we're having some issues this morning, right? I, I don't normally live stream this early unless I'm doing a morning walk. We're doing a live stream morning walk, but we've got to talk about this because Rupert Lowe's just released a video on the Restore Britain um YouTube channel, which is very interesting. Now, I don't, I'm not sure how I feel about this yet. As you can see from the title, Rupert Lowe's offer to Nigel Farage. Rupert Lowe has offered an alliance with Nigel Farage. But before we, before anybody has an im-knee-jerk reaction, because I nearly did. I was like, "What the fuck?" But let's go and watch the video together. We'll watch it together and we'll, we'll see what we think about this. I, I know what I'm thinking. I'm thinking tactically with me, right? Let's have a look at this. Uh, where we chest wheat.

>> Well, let's, let's watch this together. Nigel, when we were both elected at the general election in July 2024, the five of us all knew we had achieved something truly remarkable through starting the process of breaking the two-party system that has strangled and suffocated Britain for so very long. It was a special moment and it was an honor to walk into that building as part of our group of five MPs. I treasured that then and despite everything, I still treasure it today. However, now in 2026, we're in a very different place. The landscape has changed dramatically. Our differences over the last 18 months are well documented. I do not agree with how you removed me from Reform, but let's not recycle those same arguments again and again. I want to move past that. The country we both love is changing beyond recognition. Millions of people feel like strangers in their own communities. They work hard, pay their taxes, obey the law, and yet they see no fair reward for any of that. They see a patriotic right hopelessly divided. They see hard work punished and indolence rewarded. That is why today I'm reaching out to put personalities and our past disagreements aside for the good of the country we all so want to succeed to ask one simple question: How can we restore Britain? If we agree on five fundamental principles, then I believe we can, should, and must find a way of working together in some form to make it a reality. Reform has taken a path that has moved its core offering away from what I believe is necessary to restore our country. On many issues, we agree. On others, we do not. But I'm hopeful that a common way forward can be found and forged. But any agreement or cooperation must be based on the following values, policies, and vision.

First, restoring our borders. Ending mass immigration is not enough. The hour is just too late for that. It must be reversed. As you know, Restore Britain has taken the unprecedented step of publishing the most comprehensive deportation policy ever produced in British politics. That plan must be implemented in full and to the letter. Every illegal migrant must be deported. And yes, that must include women and children. Our plan has outlined exactly how that can be achieved within one parliament. You previously stated that mass deportations are a political impossibility. Not only must mass deportations become a political possibility, mass deportations must become a political inevitability. They must all go. Legal immigration has caused even more damage. Restore Britain's policy is simple but sound. If a foreign national is living in Britain, yet unable to speak English, refuses to work, lives in social housing, hates our way of life, or even wants to do us harm, they have abused our generosity, are incompatible with our high trust society, and they should be made to return to their own countries. There will be those in Reform who do not agree with the robust nature of such measures. But I believe it is entirely necessary. Millions must go.

Second, restoring our demographic security. It is projected that white Britons will become a minority by 2063. Nothing demonstrates the demographic vandalism of mass immigration more than that. Importing millions of people from third world nations is changing our population in a way none of us ever wanted or voted to support. It is unacceptable and it cannot be allowed to happen. We must be unafraid to grasp that nettle, however painful the establishment backlash may be. Restore Britain has committed to reversing the Islamification of Britain, and that will not change. The level of influence that Islam is exerting even now on our Christian way of life is unacceptable. Any future cooperation must include the banning of both halal and kosher slaughter, the burka, cousin marriage, mass dominating public Islamic prayer, Sharia courts, and any other barbaric foreign practices that have no place in our high trust society. Britain is a Christian country and we must ensure it remains that way. If we cannot agree on that, then there is simply no way forward. The recommendations from our independent rape gang inquiry must be implemented in full. That includes the deportation of foreign national accomplices who were aware of these heinous crimes and yet failed to act. I know you have publicly disagreed and that this was the source of our previous difference of opinion. But it is a firm red line. If a Pakistani woman knew her husband was repeatedly gang raping a vulnerable white English girl yet failed to act, she should be sent back to Pakistan. I hope her husband is not so fortunate.

Third, a referendum on restoring the death penalty. Axel Ruda Cabana, Hashim Abedi, Shabir Ahmed. Keeping these monsters alive and hundreds just like them achieves nothing. The British people must be given a full, free, and fair referendum on the reintroduction of the death penalty for the most monstrous and undeniable criminals. You have opposed this previously, and that is why letting the British people decide is the right thing to do. I will in that referendum, without a shadow of a doubt, be voting in favor.

Fourth, restoring a self-sufficient Britain. Britain must live within its means. That means controlling spending, cutting welfare costs, and making difficult decisions to bring inflation under control, and restore sound public finances. It means a Britain that can power itself, feed itself, defend itself. Restore Britain's uniquely comprehensive policy papers are already addressing these challenges. To fund that, enormous cuts must be made. These choices will not always be popular, but we must be prepared to think in generations, not just election cycles, governed by what is right for Britain, not for what will simply result in better polling. Difficult, unpopular decisions are now required. Not short-term politicking, but long-term hard planning that will ensure we leave a better Britain to our grandchildren than the one that was handed to us.

Fifth, restoring the country's faith in politics. The British people have entirely lost faith in Westminster. That trust will not be restored by recycling the same ministers, advisers, and thinking that created today's problems. Former Conservative ministers who failed our country and our people in so many appalling ways must not be part of any future cabinet. They had their chance and they failed us all. That must not be rewarded with a second opportunity. These principles of restoration will be offered to the British people on the ballot paper at the next general election with or without your cooperation. My sole aim through Restore Britain is the implementation of a properly considered policy program that will start the process of desperately needed restoration for our once great country. I do not care how that is done. I only care that it is done. So Nigel, my message is simple. If you are prepared to work together around serious policies, serious reform, and serious government, then so are we. Not because it's politically convenient for Restore Britain, not because it's personally easy. After the events of the last 18 months, I would certainly rather not be making this offer. But millions and millions of British people deserve a patriotic government that puts our national interest before any personal differences that you and I may have. If you disagree, that is your choice. Restore Britain will be ready for what comes. Regardless, I truly believe there could be sufficient common ground for our two movements to cooperate collectively to destroy the looming left-wing alliance that will finish off what hope remains for this country. We have recently shown how effectively cooperation can work locally on the Norfolk County Council. So why not at national level? In my view, failing to even try because of our own personal difficulties is simply not an option. The British people deserve nothing less than our best and sincere efforts to make it happen. Now is the time to put our differences aside and cooperate for the good of the country that we all love.

Wow. Wow. Right. So, this is why you don't do knee-jerk reactions to things like this. You don't just look at a title of a video and just make assumptions about it because like I've just said in the chat, that that isn't an olive branch. That's an ultimatum. Yeah. That's laying down the gauntlet. Black just said in the chat, that's laying down the gauntlet for Reform because what, what, what are the main criticisms that uh we've seen the Reform shills making against Restore Britain? They're splitting the vote. They don't want to compromise. They don't want to work with us. Right? Rupert's just given them that on a plate. Right? So if Nigel Farage doesn't acknowledge this or doesn't even want to, you know, join forces against a common enemy, that proves one thing about Reform. They're not interested in saving the country. Rupert Lowe knows that if he's going to win big at the next general election, he either has to work with Reform or he has to remove them out of the way. And this is the way he does that. Yeah. Said right, you know, you say you say he's saying this to Reform, saying, "You say you want to save the country, right? So all these things I've just mentioned will save the country. Now, will you stand shoulder-to-shoulder with me and implement these things?" Because if they won't, that means they're fake. They're not interested in saving the country. And Rupert Lowe wins. It shuts down people like Paul Thorp who constantly talk about unity, constantly, "Well, why won't Rupert Lowe do the right thing and, you know, offer out the olive branch?" Well, he has now. So, the pressure is on Reform Britain is on Reform now, the Reform party to acknowledge this. Yeah. There's not, there's not a single thing in there that anybody could disagree with that wants to save this country. Nothing. All those policies or Reform have been taken off Restore Britain. They, they claim to stand for this stuff. Now it's time to put their money where their mouth is and come forward and join. Yeah. It's, this is a tactical move. This isn't an olive branch by any stretch of the imagination. This is a tactical move by Rupert Lowe to remove his critics who keep saying, "You're splitting the vote. You don't want to work with Reform." This this puts all the pressure now on Nigel Farage and Reform because, well, the hand's been offered. The hand has been offered. I've given you some, you know, caveats. You've got to come forward and none of the caveats that he's given are unreasonable. Everything that Rupert Lowe said in that speech basically saves the country. You would only disagree with those policies if you're not interested in saving the country, would you? Yeah. Now, a lot of people, there's going to be people, there's going to be people making videos later this evening. We all know who they are. They will say, "I told you. I told you Rupert Lowe was containment. I told you he was a Tory um pressure valve." They won't have watched the video. They won't have understand the nuance of this or the tactical nature of this move by Rupert Lowe, basically because they're thick. That's the truth of it. Yeah. This now puts Reform on the spot. I think after the election in uh Greater Manchester, Rupert Lowe realized, "I've got, we've either got to work with these people or we've got to move them out of the way." And not only that, this is, this really isn't for the benefit of Reform if you think about it. This is for the benefit of Reform supporters who are still backing Nigel Farage because if he doesn't go for this move now, then they can't, they can't say now, they can't come to Restore Britain and say, "Well, you didn't want to work with us because Rupert Lowe said, 'Yeah, I'll work with you on these conditions.'" And like I said, there's literally nothing within what Rupert Lowe said there that isn't reasonable. And he didn't compromise, compromise a single Restore Britain policy in offering out that offer, did he? You know, all, all they've got to do is stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Restore. And we know they won't. I know they won't. You know they won't because we all know that Reform isn't serious. They're just Tory 2.0. You know, a lot of people call um Rupert Lowe a Tory. He's not a Tory. He's a conservative. There's a difference between a Tory and a conservative. Yeah, Rupert Lowe is definitely a conservative of the late '70s, early '80s in my opinion. He's a hard-right conservative. This is what we used to have in government. You know, imagine Rupert Lowe, but the entire Conservative Party is made up of people like Rupert Lowe. That's how the Conservative Party used to be before it got taken over by Tory wets, the Liberals, and all that kind of thing. Nothing Rupert Lowe says is controversial. Nothing at all. Most of the things that Rupert Lowe is saying were perfectly classed as being a normal across-the-board normal thing to say in uh the '70s, '80s, and '90s in this country before Tony Blair got into power. Things, these, the things like um secure borders, safety in our towns and cities. These things were only considered extreme when the far left got into power. And it's not, it's not that the, that the uh the right wing of politics got very, very extreme, not in the slightest. The fact that these things are seen as controversial now. Strong borders, kicking people out of the country that commit crimes, um making your towns and cities safe, putting your own people first. None of those things are controversial. Nothing about that is controversial whatsoever. The only thing that happened is is that the, the left got more extreme and they labeled these things as extreme, self, because they are extremists. Yeah. I do too. I think this is, this isn't an olive branch. Like I said before, this is laying down the gauntlet to Reform. This shuts up people like this shuts people up like Paul Thorp and all the rest of them that keep saying, "We want unity. Unite behind us." Well, here's the offer. If Nigel Farage ignores this offer or he makes some kind of snidey remark now, then he will lose support because at no point in the future now can any Reform people that uh are in Reform or who support Reform come forward and say that Rupert Lowe never wanted to work with them. He's taken that off the table now. Now they might come forward and say the things that he was saying were unreasonable. Really were they? These are all things that Reform claim to want to do. So if they're unreasonable of Rupert to ask them, and you're saying you want to implement them, doesn't that prove that you just, you're just saying what people want to hear? You've got no real interest in implementing these things. This, this is a great tactical move by Rupert Lowe. It really is. Now, when I first saw the title, I've got to admit, I had a bit of an immediate reaction like, "Oh crap." Is, is, I bet we all, I'm guessing most of you in the chat thought, "Oh, is this the moment where we lose Restore? Is this the moment where Rupert capitulates? He lost, you know, he didn't win the mayoral candidate thing in um in Manchester and is this the point now where he realizes?" Yeah, but it wasn't. This is why it's important that everybody watch videos all the way through. Yeah, everybody watch videos all the way through. Don't just rely on the title. Watch them all the way, all the way through because most of the time what the title says, sometimes doesn't really reflect what the video is. Yeah. But yeah, I'm, this is, uh, this is it. Hope you're about all. Nigel has to do is agree to talk with Rupert. Is that, this is what it's done now, hasn't it? It's taken all the pressure off Restore Britain now. All the naysayers, all the "Basing Bougie," the uh, the Paul Thorps, the other people that were constantly raving on um Restore Britain for not wanting to work with other parties. Well, now he's made his offer and what's your response? Be interesting to see how this plays out. Now, I myself, like revived, I think that he, that Nigel Farage must ignore this. They won't even acknowledge it. Thought, "We'll just say Rupert is putting unreasonable demands on Nigel and therefore is determined to keep the right divided." Probably. But we all know now that there's nothing in what Rupert said there is unreasonable. There's nothing unreasonable about that. That you would only find what Rupert Lowe said in that video unreasonable if you really had no interest in implementing any of the policies that you say you're going to implement, wouldn't you? Yeah, that's the one. Based and biased. Yeah, that's the one. Yeah, I don't think Sarah Ysef is going to go for this. I don't think Richard Ty is going to go for this. Just have a look at some of the comments, guys. See what people are actually saying about this. Yeah, totally agree. Brilliant tactic on Rupert's part. More strength. That's right. This gives me hope because it shows me that Rupert is playing a tactical game. Yeah. Unity in thought, mind means everyone accepting the sap position and joining Reform. Yeah, it's, it's not about compromise. Uh, Paul Thorp's idea of unification, uniting isn't about compromising your beliefs. It's about sacrificing um all of Restore's beliefs and accepting all of Reform's stances on things. That's his version of unity. That's what he wants. And it's, it's not, it's not, it's not going to happen, is it? They will, Reform won't want to lose face, especially on GP News. Now, to me, this will go, this will go ignored. They'll just pretend like it, it's not happened. I'll be very, very surprised if they acknowledge it in any way, shape, or form. But he's put it out there and every, the thing is now, even even if Reform don't acknowledge this, they can't use the argument now that um Restore is splitting the vote when they go into uh by-elections because, well, we offered you an olive branch, but you refused to take it. We could have cooperated. We could have stood down in certain constituencies and allowed you to stand, but you refused. You didn't want to stand with us. So, it's taken a hell of a lot of arguments off the table that I keep, that they use to smear Restore Britain with. It's a brilliant tactical move. It really is. I saw a few people earlier in the chat saying um again, repeating because they hadn't watched the full video. They were making assumptions before they seen the whole video. They were saying, "Oh, uh Restore's containment, just like Reform." They've gone strangely silent now. I can't see them in the chat anymore now that the full video's been played. Strange that, isn't it? Then they're just woke liberals. A lot of biggest pages. Yeah, I agree. I think a lot of them are. If you, if you look at them on a political compass, and I'm going to include Tommy in this as well, they're, they're center-left. They could lean anyway. They could lean a little bit to the right, but I would say they're mainly on the left. Especially some of the interviews I've seen Tommy do, especially that one where he was saying, you know, um, anybody, anybody can be English. If you feel English, that you can be English. What a load of tripe that is. It's just a centrist position that Tommy is a moderate. Yeah. The thing is though, this is, this isn't a time of moderates anymore now because we're up against some really extreme ideologies. Then we need, we need to be extreme in some circumstances ourselves as well. Yeah. That's why we need a hard right party in government. We, we don't need moderates, unfortunately. Yeah, if he doesn't even talk, if he doesn't even talk, then that just looks really bad on Reform. I agree with what most people have said in here that he's not even going to acknowledge this. If he doesn't acknowledge it, then he doesn't have to respond to it, does he? Yeah. Sh. Has everybody actually seen the video? Just do people want me to play that? Uh, people want me to play it again so you can watch it again. Shall we? No, he won't respond. I agree. He won't respond to that. Give me, give me a thumbs up in the uh, in the chat if you want to watch the video again and we'll, we'll give a little bit of a commentary to Rupert Lowe's points. Just want to see that. Yeah, he's already said that that the five points are non-negotiable. Yeah, give me a thumbs up in the chat if you want to see me um add my own commentary to this now. Give my thoughts on this as we play the video through because some people might not have seen the whole video. We'll play as we go through. Right, we'll play it again. This time I'll give my commentary. I might not be looking at the chat because I'll be on the video, but we'll play it again. Hang on. Just going to share it again. Forgot I have to share it again on this. Share screen. Go. This is for those people that haven't watched it yet. Yeah. Oh, hey Fever again today. It's crazy. Let's share it and we go. Right, let's play it.

Nigel, when we were both elected at the general election in July 2024, the five of us all knew that we had achieved something truly remarkable through starting the process of breaking the two-party system that has strangled and suffocated Britain for so very long. It was a special moment and it was an honor to walk into that building as part of our group of five MPs. I treasured that then and despite everything, I still treasure it today. However, now in 2026, we're in a very different place. The landscape has changed dramatically. Our differences over the last 18 months are well documented. I do not agree with how you removed me from Reform, but let's not recycle those same arguments again and again. I want to move past that. The country we both love is changing beyond recognition. Millions of people feel like strangers in their own communities. They work hard, pay their taxes, obey the law, and yet they see no fair reward for any of that. They see a patriotic right hopelessly divided. They see hard work punished and indolence rewarded. That is why today I'm reaching out to put personalities and our past disagreements aside for the good of the country we all so want to succeed to >> You see that there? That's putting, that's putting Nigel Farage on the spot. He's stating there, look, I'm willing to put our differences aside. Yeah. Because that's, that's another criticism that has been uh put against Rupert Lowe, that Restore Britain is just a revenge party. It's just out there to to destroy Reform and that's all it's, it's all it's going to do. So again, this is addressing that as well because by doing this, he's, Rupert's disproving that because if you've created a party just to go out and cause revenge on somebody, you wouldn't be making a video like this offering an alliance, would you? If your, if your sole purpose is to go out there and destroy Nigel Farage and the party, you wouldn't make a video like this. This, this is just handing out, this is throwing down the gauntlet, given an ultimatum. Right? This is Rupert Lowe saying to Reform, right? You stand by your policies apparently. Right? Now it's time to put your money where your mouth is. Stand with me and prove it. Prove that you really stand behind those policies. That's what he's really saying in this video. It is an offer. It's definitely an offer of an alliance, but it's also holding their feet to the fire and making them stand by their policies. Because if they don't acknowledge this, they don't acknowledge this offer and then they continue to smear Rupert Lowe, then that just proves everything that we know about them, doesn't it? They're not serious about saving the country. They don't care. They're just a containment operation. We all know that about them then. And hopefully when people wake up and realize that who still support Reform, the shift towards Restore will start to happen. Yeah. Yeah. Well, it shuts them down, doesn't it? It shuts down all that criticism. Look at all the criticism this video shuts down, right? It shuts down the criticism that Restore Britain don't want to work with other parties. They've offered out the olive, olive branch. It shuts down the criticism that they're a revenge party out to destroy Nigel Farage because obviously if you're making a video, unless you're not, you want to save the country. Yeah. It cuts down on all, all this criticism of Restore Britain. He's taking all that off the table because every time that criticism pops up now in an interview, Rupert Lowe can just point to this video and say, "I offered. I didn't get a response." He's covering his back both ways. Like people have said in the chat, this is a win-win situation for him. Now, doing this video is a, is a brilliant smart move. It really is. Now, there are going to be some people that are critical of Restore Britain that have got their own agendas that aren't going to see the tactical brilliance of this because they can't think because, like I said before, they're thick. They're just going to use this again as another way to smear Restore Britain. Not, not Reform, but people on our own side who claim to want to save the country but have their own, let's just say agenda daily, you know what I mean? Uh, they'll do that. Yeah. Thank you, buddy. Let's get back to watching this. >> One simple question: How can we restore Britain? If we agree on five fundamental principles, then I believe we can, should, and must find a way of working together in some form to make it a reality. Reform has taken a path that has moved its core offering away from what I believe is necessary to restore our country. On many issues, we agree. On others, we do not. But I'm hopeful that a common way forward can be found and forged. But any agreement or cooperation must be based on the following values, policies, and vision. First, restoring our borders. Ending mass immigration is not enough. The hour is just too late for that. It must be reversed. As you know, Restore Britain has taken the unprecedented step of publishing the most comprehensive deportation policy ever produced in British politics. That plan must be implemented in full and to the letter. Every illegal migrant must be deported. And yes, that must include women and children. Our plan has outlined exactly how that can be achieved within one parliament. You previously stated that mass deportations are a political impossibility. Not only must mass deportations become a political possibility, mass deportations must become a political inevitability. They must all go. Legal immigration has caused even more damage. Restore Britain's policy is simple but sound. If a foreign national is living in Britain, yet unable to speak English, refuses to work, lives in social housing, hates our way of life, or even wants to do us harm, they have abused our generosity, are incompatible with our high trust society, and they should be made to return to their own countries. There will be those in Reform who do not agree with the robust nature of such measures. But I believe it is entirely necessary. Millions must go. Second, restoring our demographic security. It is projected that white Britons will become a minority by 2063. Nothing demonstrates the demographic vandalism of mass immigration more than that. Importing millions of people from third world nations. It's changing our population in a way none of us ever wanted or voted to support. It is unacceptable and it cannot be allowed to happen. We must be unafraid to grasp that nettle, however painful the establishment backlash may be. Restore Britain has committed to reversing the Islamification of Britain, and that will not >> Just going to pause there. I want to answer this comment on screen. No, Daz, what he's doing is a tactical move. He's laying down the gauntlet to Nigel Farage saying, "Look, these are Restore Britain's policies. These are the policies we've put forward to save the country. Now, you claim to hold the same beliefs as we do. So stand with us and we could come to some sort of agreement." It's an ultimatum. Yeah. This is an ultimatum to um Reform. Put your money where your mouth is, or you're not really here to save the country. That's what he's saying, D. Yeah, he's not talking about a merger. You know, I think he's doing this to get a lot of the criticisms off the table that have been made by Reform about Restore Britain, that they're not willing to work with people. They are out for revenge to just destroy Nigel Farage. This video takes all that criticism off the table now. And it's a win-win situation for Rupert because if Nigel chooses not to respond to this video, then that just tells everybody that's interested in politics in this country that Reform aren't really interested in saving the country because they would accept this. They would accept this, this if they were really truly believed in saving the country, they will get on board with this. They would unify. But my guess is they're not going to do that because they're not really serious about saving the country. Every, I think I'm just preaching to the choir with this, right? I think everybody knows in the back of their mind that Reform are not interested in saving the country. They made that quite clear when they, when they allowed half of Boris Johnson's um 2019 cabinet into their party. The people that wrecked this country. I think deep down people know that Reform are not the party to save this country. Rupert Lowe is just making them put the money where their mouth is. He's holding their feet to the fire on this one now. Saying, "Right, you're saying you believe in these policies, then prove it." That's what he's saying. Like I said before, Rupert Lowe knows if he's going to win the the election in 2029, he's got to have an alliance with Reform or he's got to completely obliterate them and move them out of the way. Yeah, that's what he's doing with this. It'll be interesting to see what he's saying about it, won't it? Not change. The level of influence that Islam is exerting even now on our Christian way of life is unacceptable. Any future cooperation must include the banning of both halal and kosher slaughter, the burka, cousin marriage, mass dominating public Islamic prayer, Sharia courts, and any other barbaric foreign practices that have no place in our high trust society. Britain is a Christian country and we must ensure it remains that way. If we cannot agree on that, then there is simply no way forward. The recommendations from our independent rape gang inquiry must be implemented in full. That includes the deportation of foreign national accomplices who were aware of these heinous crimes and yet failed to act. I know you have publicly disagreed and that this was the source of our previous difference of opinion. But it is a firm red line. If a Pakistani woman knew her husband was repeatedly gang raping a vulnerable white English girl yet failed to act, she should be sent back to Pakistan. I hope her husband is not so fortunate. >> You see what's wrong with that? How can anybody say that's unreasonable to ask these five things, right? There's nothing unreasonable about anything that any of these conditions that Rupert Lowe's put in place. There's nothing unreasonable about them whatsoever. These are common sense policies. These are things that need to be enacted in order to save this country. They do. They're vital to this, to the survival of this country that these, the, these five things be implemented. Yeah. So, anybody that doesn't acknowledge this video now or anybody that just says, "Well, it's those five things that he suggested are unreasonable," then you're not serious about saving the country, are you? This is why I think and why I know some people in the chat said Nigel Farage isn't even going to acknowledge this video. He won't do it. He, if he gets asked about this in interviews, he'll just, you know, well, we all know Nigel Farage, he gets asked what questions he wants to ask, doesn't he? So, he won't even respond to this, I don't think, in my opinion. And on that third, a referendum on restoring the death penalty. Axel Ruda Cabana, Hashim Abedi, Shabir Ahmed. Keeping these monsters alive and hundreds just like them achieves nothing. The British people must be given a full, free, and fair referendum on the reintroduction of the death penalty for the most monstrous and undeniable criminals. You have opposed this previously, and that is why letting the British people decide is the right thing to do. I will in that referendum, without a shadow of a doubt, be voting in favor. Fourth, restoring a self-sufficient Britain. Britain must live within its means. That means controlling spending, cutting welfare costs, and making difficult decisions to bring inflation under control, and restore sound public finances. It means a Britain that can power itself, feed itself, defend itself. Restore Britain's uniquely comprehensive policy papers are already addressing these challenges. To fund that, enormous cuts must be made. These choices will not always be popular, but we must be prepared to think in generations, not just election cycles, governed by what is right for Britain, not for what will simply result in better polling. Difficult, unpopular decisions are now required. Not short-term politicking, but long-term hard planning that will ensure we leave a better Britain to our grandchildren than the one that was handed to us. Fifth, restoring the country's faith in politics. The British people have entirely lost faith in Westminster. That trust will not be restored by recycling the same ministers, advisers, and thinking that created today's problems. Former Conservative ministers who failed our country and our people in so many appalling ways must not be part of any future cabinet. They had their chance. I think he kind of, I think somebody said in in the chat that, you know, he didn't go far enough saying that which particular MPs shouldn't be in government recycled in parties, but I think he covered that in the first part. He did say that um ministers shouldn't be recycled, and then he went on to say conservatives. So he did, he did cover both in a way, but I agree that he should have come out and said, you know, no Labour, no Liberal Democrats, no Conservatives should be allowed in right-wing parties. They shouldn't be because they're just trying to save their own necks. They've got no interest in the politics of the right. This is just a move to save their own necks and to keep their careers going because they're career politicians. They don't give a crap about the country. So I agree with people on that. He could have gone further in regards to that. But I think people will get the gist of it from what he said here anyway, that that's not what he wants. He doesn't want any of the failed politicians coming back into future cabinets and government and stuff like that. I totally agree with that. And they failed us all. That must not be rewarded with a second opportunity. These principles of restoration will be offered to the British people on the ballot paper at the next general election with or without your cooperation. My sole aim through Restore Britain is the implementation of a properly considered policy program that will start the process of desperately needed restoration for our once great country. I do not care how that is done. I only care that it is done. So Nigel, my message is simple. If you are prepared to work together around serious policies, serious reform, and serious government, then so are we. Not because it's politically convenient for Restore Britain, not because it's personally easy. After the events of the last 18 months, I would certainly rather not be making this offer. But millions and millions of British people deserve a patriotic government that puts our national interest before any personal differences that you and I may have. If you disagree, that is your choice. Restore Britain will be ready for what comes. Regardless, I truly believe there could be sufficient common ground for our two movements to cooperate collectively to destroy the looming left-wing alliance that will finish off what hope remains for this country. We have recently shown how effectively cooperation can work locally on the Norfolk County Council. So why not at national level? In my view, failing to even try because of our own personal difficulties is simply not an option. The British people deserve nothing less than our best and sincere efforts to make it happen. Now is the time to put our differences aside and cooperate for the good of the country that we all love.

Right. Right. So, I'm going to address this comment here. Stop sharing. So, some people in the chat already say that Paul Thorp is framing this as Restore Britain wants to take over Reform. And this, this is what we were saying, wasn't it? What, what did we say at the beginning of this live stream? That there would be people that, that would try and spin it in a certain way because Paul Thorp wants Restore Britain. They want, they want Reform and Restore Britain to unite, but Thorp wants it to be a takeover of Restore Britain, not the other way around. Yeah, that's what he wants. No, it's actually my fan. It's my fan going off in the background. The reason it's happening now is because it has to. Reform are failing and Restore are rising. It's a clever way of putting Farage on the spot whilst highlighting Restore policy. Yes, it is. And I know some, I think it was you, Phoenix, that said um, "Why is he doing this now and not before the general election?" And like Gobster just said, this needs to happen now because going forward, if they, if um Restore Britain are going to win elections, they have to highlight that Reform aren't the party to do what they say they're going to do. Yeah. This puts them on the spot now. So wait until the general election to do this. You're missing an opportunity. You're missing a tactical advantage in doing this right now. Yeah. Because if you do it now, straight away, all the cards on the table, that means on the build-up to the general election now, when they come out and start spouting their usual smears against Restore Britain and Rupert Lowe, it won't stick as, it won't stick as much because all Rupert Lowe will have to say is, "Well, I offered you an alliance and a and a truce, but you didn't acknowledge it." Yeah. So they can't say they're splitting the vote or anything like that because, well, how am I splitting the vote? You know, we could have had an alliance. We could have worked out some kind of electoral pact, but they didn't respond to it. So it's, it's constantly now putting it all back on Reform. It's making them look like the unreasonable ones now that they don't want an alliance because they're not getting what they want on their terms. Yeah. Rupert Lowe laid down the law and said, "These are the five things. These are the core pr, the five core principles that I will not compromise on." And they're not unreasonable. Nothing in there, nothing of those five things he mentioned, the core principles that he won't compromise on, are unreasonable. These are supposed to be the things that Reform stand for and also want to implement. So there should be absolutely no, no way they shouldn't be able to sort things out. This, but we all know, they won't. Nigel Farage wants to be the dictator. He wants to be the one in charge of everything. He will not share power. That's why all the way through his political career, right, he's gotten rid of people that would threaten his leadership. He doesn't see allies. He only sees enemies. Rupert, um, Nigel Farage wants to be the one in charge. That's why he sits at the head of Reform. That's why you, when, if you want to remove Nigel Farage from Reform, you have to petition the board who then request Nigel Farage stand down, who can then refuse. That's how Reform is set up. They should. They really should. I think they are, um, they're out in the open now, aren't they? I'd like to go and have a look. I'm just going to go and have a look at the Paul Thorp stream still streaming this and see what his take is on this. Might not show, might play the audio so we can play the audio on it. But it will be interesting to see what his take is on this. I'd like to see how he's like, like how he's trying to frame this. Should we jump in on their live and see what's actually saying about this? Bit cheeky, but you know, for the purposes of um criticism and political commentary. Yeah. Let's have a look and see what he's got to say and then we'll, this amazing offer this morning. There are one or two things there that you, you know, if you was going to be harsh, that you could point out, you could say that the points that Rupert points out that are non-negotiable might seem more like a takeover than an offer of of a friendship of a of a willingness to. But look, that's what the >> The thing is, right? Okay. Right. All right. It may seem like a takeover, but those are policies that Reform have themselves. Yeah. Majority of those policies, what Reform have themselves, those, those five key policies are what save the country. So if Paul Thorp thinks that those policies are a takeover, then Reform isn't the party that we think it is or needs to be. Yeah. So when people come out now and say, "Oh, they're splitting the vote because both parties are identical." They're not really, are they? >> Yeah. >> Negotiation's all about, right? It's when I was going to say, when you're going into a negotiation, you know, yourself, you've been in business, you, you look at what you want, you add 100%, then you add another, another 100%, and then you get down to the actual nuts. >> Yeah. They're non-negotiable. He's always said that these things are non-negotiable. So, it's not like sell, it's not like um putting like a 100% on a car so you can, you know, dial down the price. That's not what that's about. Those four key things are un, are unnegotiable. So, any offer would be relying on Reform accepting those three, those five things. The non-negotiable. Do they understand what non-negotiable is? and bolts of what you really want. And I think if that's what this is, which is what I think it is, because look, Rupert's a businessman. Um, I, I'm a very good one. >> I spoke to Ben very briefly this morning about this and and again, you know, Ben saying that we need to do something. So everybody agrees that something needs to happen and >> I, I've been critical of everybody. I've savaged every single one of these people. That's just bollocks. You from the very beginning, Mr. Inman, were went absolutely mental when Restore Britain didn't merge with Advance UK. You lost your mind for a good portion of three months over this. You were calling literally everybody in the party ethnist because you perceived it to be a smear. And that's what you and Paul Thorp did for a solid three months because they refused to join with you. Ironically though, if they had have joined with you, none of that would have been an issue, would it? >> Yeah. And you know, again, again, I'm, I'm really excited about it, Paul. I'll be honest with you. I'm really excited. >> Richard. You know, I mean,

Look, something is going on. Last night, for the first time in a while, I had um an exchange with Tommy. I had an exchange with Ben last night. All within five minutes.

"Yeah."

And then this this morning, um so things are moving. Richard, maybe people have been listening. My people can actually see now that I said I said that this morning.

"Oh god, he is he's going to try and take credit for it, ain't he? He's going to try and take credit for it. As if Rupert Low gives a [ __ ] about what he thinks. I've had enough not share any more of that crap self-gratifying [ __ ] But yeah, um he he was going to he was going to take the credit for that level, wasn't he? Wow. I I just I just wanted to see what the gist of gist of what that was. It's like I've seen enough. Seen enough. I can't you know I can't bear to listen to the man at the best of times. But you know it was me. I got them to come together. I did it. I did. He's going to take credit for it 100%. Even though Rupert Lo just probably doesn't even know who he is. It's like I don't know. I can't listen to that. Sorry guys. No. I'm out. I'm out. That's That's all I can do. That's what it is for these people, though. They're not interested in getting the in the country back. They're interested in just taking the credit and just boosting their own profiles. It's all they're interested in doing. Yeah. Wow. It's like, no, can't listen to that crap. Oh dear. Let's have a look at some of the chat. See what you guys have been saying."

"Ious subversive plays it in who says the English don't exist as a people behaves like a globalist communist. Yeah, they they they are pretty much lefties. Rbert Low definitely doesn't know he's No, he doesn't. It made me laugh when Liam Tus was trying to get Rert Low to go on his podcast and he was like choking all his toys out the pram because Rert Low was having none of it and he tried to shame Rupert Low into going on with Expost and saying, "I've sent you several emails and you won't call." It's like he doesn't give a [ __ ] about you. He doesn't care about you one little bit. He really doesn't. Why why would he want to go on Liam Tus podcast when he knows that that certain group of people have been absolutely slating him and demonizing him for x amount of months? Why would he want to go on a podcast with people that have been doing that? Oh, of course he will. I've got no interesting in her. She's a She's a drama channel. I'm not interested in drama channels. They they will just die a death. The drama channels, that's nothing new. Nothing new at all. Yeah, I could only write a certain amount before it's going to say thank you for the offer anyway. Yeah, that's a good idea. Or at the Yeah. I'm just having a look uh this what we put those off will do is we'll do so the true colors of the form part they want to amend the five non-negotiable points here I think everybody agrees that we need mass uh mass deportations they need to go. I I'm probably more extreme than Robert Low when it comes to immigration. I would say, you know, I know people I was talking to Daz about this in a live stream the other day, but I think I reckon an an indefinite ban on all immigration completely for at least 20 to 30 years. That's just my thinking on it. Yeah. When I saw those interviews with Tommy and he was saying that basically the English identity doesn't exist, I was done. I was done at that point. I was No. No. I'm more right than Steve Laws. Yeah. Like I said, you know, the the 70s, 80s, and 90s restores policies would have been just common sense. They would have just been normal conservative policies. Yeah. Because a lot of people get confused because when you mention the word conservative, everybody assumes you're talking about the Conservative Party as it is today. People forget that, you know, before Tony Blair got in power, before we had uh David Cameron and the rest of the Tory Wets, they're in charge of the Conservatives. The Conservatives were actually a hardright party. They were in in the 80s, 70s, 80s, 90s, they were a hardright party. They were. And that's all Robert Low is. So when I call him a conservative, people think, oh, you know, I don't like conservatives in history, not present conservatives. To be honest with you, you can't really call them conservatives, can you? You can't call them conservatives because they they just I don't know. They're more like Liberal Democrats than conservatives. This is a quick ball being shredded, but lots of channels covering this mainly saying the same thing. If reform don't agree, they will switch to restore. That's this is what needs to happen. Somebody in the chat was show telling me that um talk TV discussing this. What Rupert Low has done. He's brought this he's brought this to the forefront, hasn't he? He's got everybody talking about this now, which is exactly what he wanted to do. It's going to be very very hard for Nigel Farage and reform to ignore this when people are covering it. Yeah. This is a brilliant tactical move. You can't deny it. Though though, like I said earlier, there will be those people on YouTube, and I think we all know who they are. I'm talking about the people that do nothing but attack everybody. They offer up no solutions of their own. They just attack everybody. I mentioned this in in today's morning video, right? They just attack everybody. Their sole goal is demoralize everybody. They constantly talk about how great they are, but they they anybody on the right not good enough, not meeting the standards of a nationalist that they would say they're a nationalist at. And this is why the people this is why these people stand alone in a field with nobody else around them because nobody else can meet their high standards of what a nationalist is. They've set the bar so high. Nobody can ever attain what they claim to be themselves. And they won't even be they won't be to the standard they claim to be either. This is why these people always end up on the fringe with little to no support and don't achieve anything because they're constantly purity testing everybody. Yeah. And it just results in infighting about who's the best nationalist and all that sin. and all all the things they claim to want to stand for, all the claims they want, all the things they want to achieve get lost in the infighting amongst themselves. So they never achieve anything. And I think we need to get past that. We need to acknowledge who these people are and just ignore them. You know, the country is already demoralized enough. We're we're already, you know, people are crying out for hope and yet you've got these people on YouTube that constantly just destroy hope. They offer no hope. It's all criticism. There's no solutions and it's just constant. These aren't good enough. These are they're containment. They're they're a safety valve operation. It's just constant without offering up any solutions at all. They don't give anybody any hope. The only people that watch these people are the people that are exactly the same as them. That's it. People want hope. Let's have a look at some of the chat again. Only problem would be if Ferrar said go on then, which he's desperate enough to do. Well, in that case, that's a win-win, isn't it? It's a win-win situation because reform would have to abide by those five key principles for it to work, wouldn't it? And the minute they stop abiding by those key principles or they do a U-turn on them, the deal would be off. And again, that would prove how reform are not the party to save the country. There's nothing they could do in this situation to win. This is a master stroke for restore Britain and Rupert Low. Any any outcome of this is just a win for them. It really is. But I'm I'm confused then. How is offering an olive branch to a party a solution to anything? Right. I'll explain this to you. Right. So I think we all know that reform is a containment operation, right? So they're pretending to be So they're pretending to want to save the country. So what Rutlo is doing is he's not necessarily offering out an olive branch. He's offered out an ultimatum, a gauntlet, for them for for reform to put their money where their mouth is. He's saying, "Look, these are my five core principles. If you want to savor the country, stand with me shoulderto-shoulder and share these core principles and we will take back this country. If they refuse to do that, it just proves that reform are not interested in saving the country, doesn't it? Yeah, exactly. He's calling them out. He's calling their bluff. Yeah. He's done it in a smart way. Restore will take us out of the EU in the two. It's going to be a big shake if Rbert became but yeah it is. He's already said it's going to be painful. People not probably not going to like it but it's tough. It's what needs to be done. If Nigel takes the offer it would only be get to number 10 then it would be seeing turning on Robert. But if that happens then that just destroys his reform as well doesn't it? Like I said, this is a win-win situation. No matter what Nigel Farage does, you know, the only thing he can do is comply or lose. There have been no Conservatives in the Conservative party in decades. Ununice have captured the party. Yep. What if Nigel agrees the terms though? It might backfire spectacularly. We end up with Nigel's PM and Robert as deputy. If he agrees, it's a win, isn't it? It's a win. You've got Robert Low as deputy holding his feet to the fire. Yeah. And if at any point um Nigel goes back or does a U-turn on any of those five core principles deals off he's highlighting what the main issues are. The five points that anybody with any moral normal brain can see as correct reform will not agree to any of these. This will just expose them for what they are. Correct Stefan? Politically class merged the non wet right into the wet for a bit of discipline. Yeah. If he becomes prime minister, he's going to be a force to reckon with, isn't he? No, he won't. He's not going to respond to this. No matter what pressure it is, right? It might make him angry. It could even make Nigel Farra angry and come out and say, "How could anybody agree with these absolutely unreasonable terms?" And in doing so would expose him as not being the person to save the country. The the only smart move for Nigel is probably not to respond. Well, he's still going to take the flack for it, but not as much as if he did respond in a negative way to what Robert has said. Yep, that's very true, Stefan. Well, I'm willing to hope I'm wrong and you guys are right. I just see the path where this goes wrong. It can't go wrong. Like I said in in this live stream earlier, right? Rupert alone knows, right? Reform are in the way. They're declining the polls, but will they have declined enough in the polls by the time the next general election comes around for Restore Britain to overtake? That's the gamble they're taking at the minute. Right? So he's he's put out this ultimatum. He said, "Right, you can either work with us and if you're not going to work with us, then you're enemy and we're going to remove you." And people are going to see that. Nigel's best response would actually be to say, "Hang on, Robert. I thought you hated me and saw me as untrustworthy." Well, he's already covered that in the video. He said, "Look, I'm willing to put our differences to one side." You know, I'm I'm basically Rus saying, "I'm I'm willing to trust you." If he if uh Nigel Farage did come out and say that, he could turn and say, "Have I got any reason not to trust you?" That's the way to respond to it. Alex on top. I wonder what her respon she's going to have an absolute meltdown at this because this destroys her narrative completely, doesn't it? About um restore Britain just being a revenge party to get back at Nigel Farage. She'll never be able to say that again. Alex Phillips is on talk. Wonder what the response will be or will it be more reform? Uh probably restore slander. If so, then we know where reforms stand since Alex is close to Nigel. Probably anyone that disagrees with Robert Lo is showing themselves the traitor within and must be deported or put high trees in list yet. Don't agree with that. Nigel's com team will be sweating like a blind lesbian in a fish and chip shop right now. Yeah, but this has done exactly what it needed to do, hasn't it? It's put them in the spotlight. It's like if you do respond, it better be a very good response. If you don't respond, people are going to want to know why, including your own members. Because many reform members are calling out for this, right? They're calling out for the right to unite. No, they've seen the videos. They will have seen the videos that they made about them at the beginning when the Restore Britain launched and the way that they went out tooth and nail to actually destroy and slow down the momentum of Restore Britain with all their smears and false information. They'll have nothing to do with them. I think that this I think Robert's seen the low turnout. He's seen the low turnout in the MEL election and realizing things resto reform are actually hurting the voter turnout because they're not convincing people to come out and vote for them. I think if you only had restore written on the uh the ballot paper, I think more people would come out and vote. I really I really believe that. some more comments. Right. So, what I'm going to do is for about for the last um last 10 minutes, I'm going to drop the link in the chat. Anybody wants to come in here and have a talk, you're quite welcome to do so. I'm only looking for new people. So people that have been in before, if you click the link and you come in, then I will decline you. So don't feel offended. I'm just looking for new people. Yeah. To come in and have a chat, maybe discuss this. Give people an opportunity to have their say on all this. Links in the chat. If you want to pop in, have a quick word, you can do. You know the rules of the live stream. Um you'll come backstage. Clicking the link won't take you direct direct into live stream. It'll just bring you backstage. So all I'll ask you to do is show your face on camera. Then if you want to quickly turn your camera off, you can do and then I'll bring you to the live stream. And please make sure your audio is set before you click the link. Thank you. So anybody wants to come in, you're quite welcome to do so. I'll drop the link in the chat again. I'm coming off. Let's have words. Robert knows we can't be ready for 229. Not without help. Neither can we form. We do this together or not at all. Yeah. Thank you, buddy. I really appreciate that. I I want to say I appreciate all the members. I don't say this often enough. I appreciate all the members. I appreciate all the um all the mods that come and moderate on my channel and do all sort of things. I want I want to thank everybody for liking and sharing the content as well, especially the people that hype it as well. I really do appreciate the hype and all that kind of stuff. It really does help the channel and helps me get out to a wider audience. I mean, the goal of this channel is to grow and get bigger so we can spread the word and wake even more people up. And once the channel gets bigger, then I can start investing in going out to protest further a field and um bringing you on the spot coverage of what's going on in the country. That's the mission of the channel. So, I want to thank everybody that sh likes, shares, all the content. I really do appreciate it. Want to thank all the subscribers, old and new. Everybody that's been here from the beginning. Really appreciate it. Thank you. Let's look at this. Farage is surrounded by dodgy people, though. Personally, I wouldn't entertain doing a deal with him. Yeah, but I think you take it too literally. I think Rbert Low knows in the back of his mind there's no way in hell that Nigel Farage is going to accept this deal. No way in hell it this does more damage to reform really if you think about it. Hey Annie, how you doing? Good to see you. Hey Vin, I'm out about an hour behind on the vid so I won't comment after this. Okay, good to see you though. Right. Um, I'm going to call it. Nobody I'm going to drop the link one last time. If nobody wants to come in for a chat, I'm going to end the live stream. I want to thank everybody coming. So am I. I've never had any of the vaxes or anything like that. I've got the link in the chat when you've got two minutes to drop in. If you're not going to drop in, then I'm going to end the live stream. I will check it out. I'm going have to start and do some more um channel promotions of other smaller channels. Yeah. Right guys, doesn't like anybody's interested in coming in. I don't blame you. It's early in the morning. Right guys, thank you for coming along. Thank you for listening to the live stream. Thank you for giving your input and commenting and that sort of thing. I shall see you all soon in the morning video tomorrow. This is Vindicator signing off."