📱

Get Our Mobile App

Take your business learning on the go!

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

What’s really killing Black Americans early?

Elephants in Rooms - Ken LaCorte20:59

Transcription

Why do black Americans die younger than white Americans, or most other Americans for that matter? It sounds like a simple question, but it isn't. And the answers you usually hear—racism, poverty, access to healthcare—they're partly right, partly wrong, and mostly incomplete.

Here's what's interesting and troubling. This is one of those topics where the mainstream conversation is so locked into a particular framework that some of the most important data barely gets discussed at all. Not because it doesn't exist, but because asking certain questions out loud makes some people feel uncomfortable, professionally, politically, and personally.

I'm Ken Laort. I dig into topics like this because I think we all deserve straight answers more than safe ones. And this one has some genuine surprises, including a data point about black immigrants that'll make most people rethink their assumptions about what's really going on behind the deadly gap.

Here's what we'll cover. First, we'll look at what the data tell us, because the raw numbers are more nuanced than the headlines suggest, as always. Then, we'll get into some explanations for why, including which popular explanations hold up and which ones are on shakier ground. And finally, we'll talk about what nobody wants to talk about: the factors with real explanatory power that make people uncomfortable.

In the next few minutes, you'll know more about this topic than most people who've been arguing about it for years. Okay, let's begin with what the data tell us, because the clues start there.

In 2021, the average black American lived to 71 years old. The average white American lived to 76, which is about the US average. Latinos lived to 78, and Asian-Americans to 84. Native Americans, a group that finds itself at the bad bottom of so many charts, only live to about 65 years old. The gap between black and white Americans, about 5 1/2 years.

But the story gets vastly more complicated when you actually start picking apart those numbers and looking at them more closely. First surprise: the gap isn't uniform throughout ages. Meaning, black Americans who make it to their mid-70s actually live longer than white Americans in the same age group. The problem isn't being old and black in America. The problem is getting there in the first place. The gap is driven almost entirely by deaths earlier in life, usually preventable deaths that shouldn't be happening at all.

Second surprise: "black Americans" is doing a lot of heavy lifting as a category, because when you split it by gender or background, you're looking at completely different situations. The CDC says black women live on average 78 years old, and white women 81. There's a gap there, but it's getting pretty close. Black men, though, that gap is almost twice as large. Black men live about five to six years less than white men and fall even further back compared to black women.

What's behind those numbers for black men? Well, there's a couple specific causes that drive it, and we'll get into them in a bit, because they're more surprising than you might expect. For now, just know that the headline, "black Americans live shorter lives," is really, in a large part, a story about black men dying young. And that distinction matters enormously for what the solutions might look like.

Now, let's zoom out a little, because the long-term trend tells a more upbeat story. In 1900, black Americans lived roughly 15 fewer years than whites. That's more than a health disparity, because it represented two different worlds. And it makes sense when you look at what black life actually looked like in 1900. Most black Americans at the turn of the last century were sharecroppers in the rural South, living in overcrowded shacks with no plumbing, clean water, no access to medical care. Diseases that were becoming manageable for white Americans—tuberculosis, pneumonia, typhoid—they were still mass killers in black communities because the basic infrastructure to fight them off simply didn't exist. About a third of black babies died before their first birthday in 1900. Think about that. And black mothers, they died in childbirth at staggering rates. A segregated medical system meant that even when hospitals existed nearby, black Americans often couldn't use them. So that 15-year gap wasn't all that mysterious. It was the direct, measurable consequences of poverty, segregation, and deliberate exclusion from that public healthcare that saved other lives.

60 years later, the gap had narrowed to seven years. Progress was real, and it was fast, driven by better infant survival, infectious disease control, and basic health finally reaching black communities for the first time. And then it kind of stalled. The gap plateaued in the '70s and '80s. It crept back down through the '90s and 2000s, then stalled again. For 40-plus years, we've been grinding through the same stubborn gap, with a stumble during the COVID pandemic. Something stopped working.

But before we get into explanations, there's another data point that should make you think, because it blows up the simplest versions of almost every argument in this debate. Black immigrants, people who voluntarily came to America from Africa or the Caribbean, they live longer than US black Americans, and it's not even close. A 2025 study published in the American Journal of Epidemiology found that in 2019, foreign-born black men had a life expectancy of 82.3 years. That's higher than white men, and it's 11 years more than US-born black men. For female black immigrants, the gap was nine years. By multiple measures, they're healthier than any average American—black, white, brown, or whatever. They have lower hypertension, lower obesity rates, and they have dramatically lower rates of diabetes, and they have 40% lower cardiovascular death rates. These people live in the same country as everyone else. They deal with the same racism. They use the same healthcare system. Sometimes they live in the same neighborhoods. And yet, they're healthier than almost everyone else.

And here's the kicker: that advantage vanishes within one generation. The kids of black immigrants raised in the United States, they start showing the same health profile as the broader native-born black population. Something gets lost in translation between one generation and the next. Whatever health behaviors and cultural patterns these immigrants brought with them gets erased in their American-born children. And it's one of the more important clues in the entire puzzle.

So, we know the gap is real. Now comes the harder question: the explanations for why. Researchers have been arguing about it for decades, and there's no shortage of theories. Some have stronger evidence. Some have become accepted wisdom, even though the data behind them isn't really strong. And some explanations, they barely get mentioned at all, again, for reasons that have more to do with feelings and politics than science.

Let's go through them. The explanations you hear most often tend to cluster around structural factors: racism, poverty, lack of access, segregation. And some of those are legitimate, but a few of the popular ones, they just don't hold up.

Take food deserts. Everyone's heard this one. Black Americans disproportionately live in neighborhoods where fresh, nutritious food is hard to find, and that drives higher rates of obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. It's a clean, compelling narrative, but the research just doesn't back it up. Studies that track what happens when grocery stores open up in underserved neighborhoods, they find little to no improvement in diet or health. A major Stanford study found that low-income people of all races already shop outside their immediate neighborhoods for groceries far more than the food desert theory assumes. Another study from 2019 found that when low-income families gained access to a new supermarket, their purchasing habits barely budged at all. The food desert explanation, it feels right, but feeling right and being right, that's not the same thing.

Green space is another concept. The argument is that black Americans have less access to parks and green spaces, and it contributes to physical inactivity and worse mental health outcomes. And it's true, green space access is generally associated with better health. But wealthy black Americans in well-resourced neighborhoods with plenty of park access are still worse off than comparable white Americans. If green space were even a primary driver, you wouldn't expect to see that. And plenty of rural white communities sit surrounded by nature and still have sky-high obesity rates.

Then there's an idea that has a little bit more science behind it: stress. The idea that navigating poverty and a racist society, it produces chronic stress that accelerates biological aging and drives up the rate of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Some researchers call it "weathering." And chronic stress absolutely does cause real, measurable physiological damage: elevated cortisol, disrupted sleep, increased inflammation. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is how much the life expectancy gap can be explained by this. I mean, most studies rely on self-reported experiences of discrimination, which really makes it hard to isolate racism-related stress from other factors like poverty, or even neighborhood conditions, or health behaviors. The underlying concept is plausible, but any effect is it's just much harder to pin down than the people promoting it say it is.

So now let's turn to some ideas that show clear correlations between race and longevity. But before we get into that, please listen to this message from today's sponsor, Chapter.

If you or someone you know is trying to get on Medicare, you really should pay attention, because the system is confusing, and not all Medicare brokers are on your side. In fact, the Department of Justice is suing three of the largest Medicare brokers in the country for allegedly misrepresenting themselves as unbiased while steering seniors into plans that paid the largest kickbacks. The dirty secret: this is how the Medicare landscape largely operates. So, I researched this company, and I think Chapter is a great antidote to that. Chapter is the only Medicare adviser in the country that compares every Medicare plan available to you from every insurance company—over 24,000 plans nationwide. Their advisers are honest, salaried, and have no incentive to steer you into any particular plan. They find the plan that fits your doctors, your medications, and your budget, not the plan that pays them the most. And if you're already on the right plan, they'll let you know. If you have any questions at all, call Chapter today at 314-732-1800. The call is free, and you'll talk to a real person. I mean, everyone's situation is different, but on average, people who work with Chapter have saved $1,100 a year. That's real money. Again, their number is 314-732-1800. Call Chapter today.

Okay, back to longevity and race. If the most popular explanations are weaker than advertised, what actually holds up? A few things. Start with economics, but with a little bit of an asterisk. Income is a powerful predictor of life expectancy across every racial group. Poor people die younger. That's that's not even controversial. And black Americans are disproportionately poor, which clearly contributes to the gap. But here's the asterisk: when you look at this by income class, the gaps don't change much. Black Americans with college degrees have worse health outcomes than white and Hispanic Americans with only high school diplomas. A wealthy black American is still not as healthy on average as a comparably wealthy white American. So poverty matters for people of all ethnic backgrounds, but it's not the driving differentiator I thought it might be.

Healthcare access is a more concrete structural factor. Some studies show black Americans who are insured receive measurably worse care on average—less likely to be referred to specialists or offered medical options, even with the same coverage. I have to say, though, when it gets into some of the research in this area, you need to pay extra close attention, because some of these studies, they pretend to be research when they're really designed to give public relations support to a related cause. For instance, if you want more black doctors in America, a study showing that white doctors are too likely to misunderstand black physiology, that's a good talking point. If you want a park in a poor neighborhood, a relational study that implies you're cutting lives short if you don't support more parks, politicians react to that. And these studies that I've seen, some of them actually misrepresent the truth enough that it's hard to accept it as just a mistake.

Segregation, though, is a much more compelling structural argument, and it deserves more attention than it usually gets. Not because of some abstract notion of separation, but because of what segregation actually does in practice. It concentrates poverty in ways that amplify its effects. A poor person in a mixed-income neighborhood has access to better schools, safer streets, and more economic opportunity than an equally poor person in a hyper-segregated neighborhood. Segregated neighborhoods, they tend to have fewer hospitals, fewer specialists, older infrastructure, and higher exposure to environmental hazards like lead. Those are direct material disadvantages with well-documented health consequences.

And then there's genetics. Another conversation that gets people tweaky. But if we're being honest with ourselves, the evidence on this, it's hard to ignore completely. People of West African descent have measurably higher rates of high blood pressure than people of European descent. And this disparity shows up in Africa, too, even before any exposure to American poverty or food environments. That strongly suggests a genuine genetic component, not purely a social one. And there's also solid research on salt sensitivity. Black Americans appear to metabolize sodium differently, with a greater blood pressure response, which combined with high sodium diets amplifies risk. Black men also have a significantly higher rate of aggressive prostate cancer than any other group. That's a disparity that persists across income levels and healthcare access.

Now, none of this means that genetics is the answer. It means genetics and behavior and structure, they all interact. And a genetic predisposition to hypertension, it becomes far more deadly when you have chronic stress or a high sodium diet or limited healthcare access. All of these things always mix together. So, the question isn't which single factor is the cause, it's understanding how they combine.

As always, if I mess up something serious here, let me know. I'll address it in the comments. You can also find my sources and notes in the description box.

Okay, so now let's look at what nobody wants to talk about. Because there's a reason certain explanations are largely missing from the conversation about black health, and it has nothing to do with truth or science. Because suggesting that behavioral or cultural factors contribute to the life expectancy gap can get you labeled a racist very quick. And in academics or medicine, that can be career-ending. So researchers learn quickly which questions are safe to talk about and which they should stay away from. And the result is a body of public health literature that in some areas is more shaped by professional self-preservation than scientific curiosity.

That's a huge problem, because the explanations that don't get asked about are, in some cases, the ones with the most explanatory power. To be fair, though, the racism-focused framework, it corrected a genuine historical wrong. For a long time, health disparities were explained away with junk science about biological racial inferiority. I mean, that history is real, and a correction was necessary. But there is such a thing as an overcorrection, and it comes at a cost. And the cost here is that behavioral, cultural, and genetic factors get systemically underexplored, and that ultimately hurts the people this research is supposed to help.

So let's talk about them. Start with obesity. It's unglamorous, and it's uncomfortable, and it's likely to be one of the most powerful drivers of the life expectancy gap. Black adults have the highest obesity rates of any racial group in the country. About 42% of all black adults in America are obese. The women's obesity rate is nearly double that of white women. And obesity, it's not an abstraction. It directly drives hypertension, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, stroke—all chronic conditions that are killing blacks at disproportionate rates. You can't have an honest conversation about the life expectancy gap and treat obesity as a footnote.

And here's where it gets complicated. Again, a middle-class black woman has a higher obesity rate than comparably affluent white women. That gap persists even after you control for income, neighborhood, or access to healthy food. Which means something beyond economics is at work. Something psychological, cultural, genetic, or a combination of all three. It's important to note that higher body weight is more culturally accepted in most sectors of the black community. Maybe that's sensitive, but it's a documented thing. And if it's contributing to shortened lives, it's worth a conversation.

Then there's heart disease. It's the leading killer of black Americans, and it accounts for a fair share of the life expectancy gap. Black Americans die from cardiovascular disease at significantly higher rates than white Americans and at younger ages. Of course, that's downstream from the things we've been talking about: some genetics, some lifestyle behaviors. And those lifestyle behaviors can be changed, and that would certainly save lives. So, that framing makes researchers uncomfortable because it can sound like victim-blaming. Nonetheless, that doesn't make it less true. It just means fewer people will hear something that might save their lives. Lifestyle influence chronic diseases; they account for more than half of the life expectancy gap, according to some estimates.

Now, I got to say, the estimates on all of these things, it just depends on which study you're looking at. But a recurrent theme is that the conventional wisdom points people away from interventions that are the most likely to make a difference. There also might be a cultural reluctance to engage with the medical system. A 2024 Pew study found that 51% of black Americans believes the US healthcare system was designed to hold down black people. Now, whether that stems from personal experiences or historical patterns, that's tough to distinguish. But the practical consequence today is that it delays care-seeking, and conditions caught later, they're just harder to treat. Cancers get worse. Chronic diseases, if they're not managed properly, they can become catastrophic. So a distrust of the system, for whatever reason, has a body count.

Also, cultural attitudes towards mental health treatment compounds it. Black Americans are significantly less likely to seek mental health care than white Americans, even with symptoms that are comparable. And untreated depression, anxiety, they all have downstream effects on physical health.

And finally, another sucky number that puts everything else in perspective when it's even brought up at all: murder. Homicide is the leading cause of death for black men between the ages of 15 and 34. Life expectancy, it's calculated as an average across the entire population. So when a significant number of people in a group die in their teens or 20s or 30s, it drags down the average dramatically. And the numbers are huge. Over 12,000 black Americans were homicide victims in 2023. 85% of those were male. Per capita, black men were six times more likely to be murdered than white men. Again, studies vary, but when researchers run the numbers on black life expectancy with homicide removed, the black-white gap narrows substantially. Not to zero, but substantially.

So, where does this all leave us? A century ago, there was a simpler story. Black Americans were dying younger because the system was stacked against them. Racism wasn't just a factor; it was the overwhelming factor. Today, it's messier. Structural barriers haven't disappeared entirely, but they've shrunk dramatically. And still, the gap hasn't disappeared, which means it's being driven by a more complicated mix of everything we've talked about here. Anyone who tells you it's simply one thing is either not that smart, or they're selling you something.

Closing this life expectancy gap the rest of the way, it's it's going to be hard to fix because even the problems are hard to find and address. And they're not going to be easily solved by a new law or funding some new program. They're going to require tough conversations that aren't currently being had in our society and new solutions to them.

Hey, if you like this video, there's a couple others you also might find interesting. One dives into the deeper issue of why poor people are more likely to be overweight. In much of the world, and throughout essentially all of history, being poor meant being skinny. Now it's the opposite. But why? Or if you're in a lighter mood, so to speak, why do black men like big butts? Interestingly, there's real research on this, and it's a fascinating cultural dive.

Hey, I hope I gave you a fair view on this topic and that it was worth the time you spent with me. Thanks for watching.