Transcription
Leftists trying to engage in violence get rocked by a dude who's going massively viral for knocking out like three or four far-left extremists. And there's an important thing I want to say about this clip I'm going to play for you. The dude, the maggadote, the American flag who rocks these leftists is backing off the whole time. This is the world we are living in. The game these people are playing on the left. They think it's a game. And the people on the right know it's serious and they are avoiding, often as they do, the violence. But when the left refuses and decides to get violent, they get rocked. We'll play this video for you guys. Let's watch it from the beginning. Mind you, the audio can be a little annoying because, well, the liberals are intentionally trying to be annoying. I'm not trying to be derisive. They are blasting weird sounds and trying to annoy people.
So, I'll set this up real quick. There's a dude in a red and black jacket with a purple umbrella sticking a megaphone into the ear of a guy with an American flag, blasting him. That's assault and battery right off the get-go. And what does he do with the American flag? He retreats over and over again for like 20 or 30 seconds before finally putting the guy fighting back. These leftists are playing a game. He's doing the "I'm not touching you" game. The dude on the right's not playing a game.
That's one knockout. That's two. That's three. That was like four.
Well, he didn't knock that guy out, but he hit him.
He gets knocked down.
And check it out. Here's the guy who initially started the fight, walking up and crunch.
That's a knockout. That's a knockout, bro. Look at this. Look at this. We're going to slow-mo it. The dude in the red, this guy with the jacket, walking up to the guy. He's still backing up. The guy on the right is still walking backwards trying to avoid the fight. And then bang, right in the guy's face. He just goes, he's out. He's gone. Knockout. Pure.
Now, here's what I'm going to say, man. They say "fafo." These leftists, these liberals are playing a game. I was saying this in the earlier segment. They don't understand. In the beginning, take a look. He's got, he's smiling. He's all happy. He's smiling as he's sticking a megaphone into the ear of this guy, blasting loud sounds. Okay, that's battery. All right, for those that don't know, every state's got a little bit different, but the general idea is assault is putting someone in reasonable fear of harm. Particularly Illinois, I can cite Illinois. That's where I'm from. New York is different. Assault is actually causing damage. I looked this up a while ago. I'm pretty sure. I haven't checked in a long time, but my understanding in New York is you have to actually damage or injure a person for it to be an assault. I don't know about Minnesota, but the point is, if you're blasting someone in the ear with a megaphone, you're hurting them. And this dude tries to avoid a conflict. And this guy, look at that grin on his face. He's all happy about what he's doing. The guy backs up, not so happy. After the dude won't back down, and then crunch right in his face, knocking him down. That's knockout number one. Dude's hat flies off, drops his stuff, and then immediately they try to attack the dude on the right.
Now, listen, the fight you win is the fight you avoid. Don't get into fights, bro. And I hear a lot of people, they try to be all tough and macho. They're like, "No way, man. You..." No, no, no. Listen, this guy tried avoiding the fight. He did the right thing. Then these, and he was retreating, and these guys are charging at him, and he just knocks out like four dudes. Dude in the red comes back. Here he comes. He throws his umbrella down. It looks like he pulls his glove off. You see this? This dude is intending to use serious force. He wants to cause great bodily harm to this guy. So, check this out. He throws the umbrella. You can see he's wearing two. He's got one big glove on his right hand, a small glove. It looks like he then rips the glove off. You can't really see it. And yeah, looks like he pulled the glove off. And now he is walking towards the guy with clear intent. As, check this out, bro. The guy on the right is backing away. And then dude in the red, crunch, out like a light. Body goes limp.
Now, here's what I'm going to say, man. They say they they say "fafo." These leftists, these liberals are playing a game. I was saying this in the earlier segment. They don't understand. In the beginning, take a look. He's got, he's smiling. He's all happy. He's smiling as he's sticking a megaphone into the ear of this guy, blasting loud sounds. Okay, that's battery. All right, for those that don't know, every state's got a little bit different, but the general idea is assault is putting someone in reasonable fear of harm. Particularly Illinois, I can cite Illinois. That's where I'm from. New York is different. Assault is actually causing damage. I looked this up a while ago. I'm pretty sure. I haven't checked in a long time, but my understanding in New York is you have to actually damage or injure a person for it to be an assault. I don't know about Minnesota, but the point is, if you're blasting someone in the ear with a megaphone, you're hurting them. And this dude tries to avoid a conflict. And this guy, look at that grin on his face. He's all happy about what he's doing. The guy backs up, not so happy. After the dude won't back down, and then crunch right in his face, knocking him down. That's knockout number one. Dude's hat flies off, drops his stuff, and then immediately they try to attack the dude on the right.
Now, listen, the fight you win is the fight you avoid. Don't get into fights, bro. And I hear a lot of people, they try to be all tough and macho. They're like, "No way, man. You..." No, no, no. Listen, this guy tried avoiding the fight. He did the right thing. Then these, and he was retreating, and these guys are charging at him, and he just knocks out like four dudes. Dude in the red comes back. Here he comes. He throws his umbrella down. It looks like he pulls his glove off. You see this? This dude is intending to use serious force. He wants to cause great bodily harm to this guy. So, check this out. He throws the umbrella. You can see he's wearing two. He's got one big glove on his right hand, a small glove. It looks like he then rips the glove off. You can't really see it. And yeah, looks like he pulled the glove off. And now he is walking towards the guy with clear intent. As, check this out, bro. The guy on the right is backing away. And then dude in the red, crunch, out like a light. Body goes limp.
Now, here's the thing. I bet you they're gonna come for this guy. Minnesota is an antagonistic state. They don't care about who started the fight, who is right to fight. None of that matters. What matters is you are against them. We take a look at what happened with Renee Good. Let me let me pull this up for you. Mediaite. Renee Good's killing reveals why fact-based journalism loses the narrative battle. Let me explain this to you guys. Conservatives don't seem to get it. You are against them. They don't care if it's legally justified to shoot Renee Good or not. They don't care if they're legally allowed to assault you or not. You are their enemy and they're going to use force against you. And we've seen this for a decade plus. There are organizations like "By Any Means Necessary." There is a group "By Any Means Necessary," and they advocate for doing anything. I've long warned that these people argue for a "diversity of tactics." What does that mean? Means if you're a liberal who's nonviolent, you have to let them be violent because they will do whatever they have to do to destroy you. So when you say, "Hey, it's illegal to put that thing in my ear," they go, "We don't care." They kill people. Michael Reynold shot Aaron Dalen twice in the chest for just being a Trump supporter. And then, to be fair, he got hunted down by the feds and he was shot. He was killed in a shootout. These people are upset that one of theirs was killed.
Now, many of them believe it's a game. Don't get me wrong. The leftists understand a little bit better. The liberals think they're playing. "Why did you have real bullets?" These are not crowd control operations at a protest. You are engaging armed federal law enforcement agents. The leftists know they're not allowed to do that. They know that these cops will use lethal force. They don't care. So, you get this story. This is funny. Not funny, haha. Renee Good's killing reveals why fact-based journalism loses the narrative battle. It's not fact-based journalism. Stephen A. Smith even said the killing was justified from a legal standpoint, and he's correct. They're... John Stewart comes out, all these liberals saying, "Yeah, but what about shots two and three?" Immaterial to any context. I'm not saying he should have shot her. I don't think he should have. The point is, did he have fear that he was going to be killed? Well, the vehicle was accelerated. Yeah, but she was turning the vehicle to the right. Doesn't mean he won't get hit and his leg crushed. Great bodily harm. It doesn't mean the wife or anyone else standing next to the car is not going to get hit. She's attempting to flee a felony, which is another felony.
Here's what they write. "Good was shot and killed by an ICE agent in South Minneapolis on January 7th during a federal enforcement operation. Within hours, the DHS said the agent acted in self-defense after Good attempted to run over officers with their vehicle." Trump said he was ran over. That's not correct. That's a lie. Okay. And and and you, I would argue this. He's not just wrong because Trump could have fact-checked something so serious, but to claim he was, he's lucky to be alive. Oh, it's laughable. The agent got hit by the car, slid back on the ice, and probably was not injured in the least bit. He had been injured in the past. So, there's a question about whether or not he feared reasonable harm. It was reasonable to fear great bodily harm or death. And I think the answer is yes. We're not here to be psychics. We're here to say, would a person feel that way? Especially this guy. Yes. But he wasn't hurt. Let's not play stupid games.
Mediaite says, "Local officials, including Mayor Jacob Frey and Governor Tim Waltz, rejected the federal account, calling it inaccurate and misleading. The FBI is now leading the investigation. While state authorities say they have limited access to evidence, those facts are widely accepted in mainstream reporting. What locked in quickly was narrative-driven interpretation." They go on to say, "Conservative media following the lead of Trump." You see the world we live in. It is not generally accepted true. Liberals just accept it as true. And the media is driving a liberal narrative. Now, Trump's narrative is wrong, too. But, as it often goes, prominent conservative or right-leaning or independent media are not claiming what Trump said is true. They're saying, "She accelerates, the tire spins out, pointed at the officer on the ice. He can hear the engine rev. Then she's spinning the wheel. Okay. The idea that this officer murdered a woman for no reason is stupid and not correct." And that's the right is saying. The right is not arguing she attempted to murder a guy, so he stopped her. Some are, but independent media countering the "mainstream narrative" are not making the argument for the most part. I initially thought she was just trying to flee. Upon seeing the wheels aimed leftwards and towards the officer spinning out in the ice, she's accelerating and the ice is stopping her. I said, "Wow, I think she actually might have been trying to kill the guy." And then with new footage coming out, I said, "Okay, I think she was trying to flee, but clearly the acceleration towards the officer as the wheels then start turning right, it's more of a she was trying to get away, but didn't care if she rammed this officer and killed him." I think that's the best assessment you're going to get. I think it's the fairest assessment. I don't think this liberal playing a game thought this, especially with the significant other saying, "Why did you have real bullets?" I think she was trying to flee.
These people think it's a game. "Why did you have real bullets?" Because they go out and they play cops and robbers. When law enforcement comes out for protests, they have rubber bullets and bean bags. And the left thinks it's a game. You don't get prison. You don't get killed. But ICE is not doing crowd control. ICE is enforcing the law against criminals. And these liberals are injecting themselves thinking it's a game. They don't get it. And then this story is hilarious because, like, the mainstream clearly accepts that she was just fleeing and ICE murdered her. Oh man, people are nuts.
So, I am going to say this. These are children. They're children. They are children. They're functional children. I think it's because "good times make weak men," as the saying goes. These people don't understand that it's not a game. I've made this point before, and you know, I say, like, it would be great if we took these people, if they were just dropped resourceless in the middle of the woods for two or three days. Just two or three days because they can survive it. I mean, anyone... I'm not literally suggesting we drop people in the middle. I'm saying if they were, maybe they would finally recognize the brutal realities of life. In fact, I've made numerous offers to these progressives to go to some of these countries. I said, "We'll send you to Jordan. How about we go to Afghanistan?" And they always say no because they're playing a game. They've never experienced being shot at. We had a liberal on the show last week, and I said, "Have you ever faced a life or death situation?" No, of course not. Indeed, I have. And that being said, I would not have shot this woman. I'm not a law enforcement officer, nor have I ever wielded a weapon in a conflict. I have been shot at during riots and around others who have been shot. And my reaction is different. I don't think I would have made the... my reaction would not have been as such. I'm not him, though. So, I understand what you are thinking in these moments. But these people think it's a game. They think the cops are walking around with rubber bullets because they're just playing. She doesn't understand because she's a child. She's a functional child. That this is a law enforcement officer targeting criminals, rapists, murderers, and general illegal immigrants who some may be... they don't know the level of violence they may face.
I'd like you to imagine this. Go watch... what's that? Um, what's that? Oh, man. What's that? What's that? Why am I forgetting the name? Who is it? Uh, who is in it? Um, Emily Blunt. Sicario. I was like, I... it was on the tip of my tongue. Go watch Sicario, man. What a great, great movie. Second one's pretty good, too. But the first one's epic. Go watch that film. Watch the scene when they're at the border and they get in the shootout. It's just, it's just remarkable. Imagine there's a bank robber with an AR-15, and the cops are like, "We got to arrest this guy." And a bunch of liberals show up being like, "No, leave him alone. Why do you have real bullets?" Because that guy does, too.
So, anyway, man, it's a game to these people. That's all it is. I'm going to wrap it up there. Smash the like button. Share the show with every single person you've ever met. Just do a mass text. Send them the link. I'm half kidding, but it would be pretty nuts if 150,000 people just blasted their phone book. Uh, follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. Thanks for hanging out. We got more segments coming, and we'll see you all then.