Transcription
In the morning of April 14th, 1561, at daybreak, between 4 and 5:00 a.m., a dreadful apparition occurred on the sun. And then this was seen in Nuremberg, in the city, before the gates, and in the country by many men and women.
At first, there appeared in the middle of the sun two blood-red semicircular arcs, just like the moon in its last quarter. And in the sun, above and below, on both sides, the color was blood. There stood a round ball of partly dull, partly black ferris color. Likewise, there stood on both sides, and as a Taurus about the sun, such blood-red ones, and other balls in large number, about three in a line, and four in a square, also some alone.
In between these globes, there were visible a few blood-red crosses, between which there were blood-red strips, becoming thicker to the rear, and in the front malleable like the rods of reedgrass. [music] Which were intermingled. Among them, two big rods, one on the right, the other to the left, and within the small and big rods, there were three also, four and more globes.
These all started to fight among themselves, so that the globes which were first in the sun blew out to the ones standing on both sides. Thereafter, the globes standing outside the sun in the small and large rods flew into the sun. Besides, the globes flew back and forth among themselves and fought vehemently with each other for over an hour. And when the conflict in and again out of the sun was most intense, they became fatigued to such an extent that they all, as said above, fell from the sun down upon the earth as if they all burned. And then they wasted away on the earth with immense smoke. After all this, there was something like a black spear, very long and thick, cited, the shaft pointed to the east, the pointed west. Whatever such signs mean, God alone knows.
Hey everyone, have you ever noticed that it's hard to deny the fact that over recent years enormous cases of historical falsification have been uncovered dating back to the end of the 19th century and area? So the deeper we diving into the time, the more distorted the official historical position becomes. In my last video, I discussed the concept of androgynous, which was passed down to us through Plato, and how he linked it to the moon. However, when I attempt to understand more about this concept, I encountered different complete idea related to one of the most famous symbols in the world right now, which is going to lead us to some distorted stuff about the history and the moon. >> [music] >> I think that symbol everyone know it. You most probably know it is a symbol from flags of Turkey and Pakistan, or probably think that it is somehow related to Islam. When you go to Wikipedia, the page that speak about this uh symbol, you will be surprised about the plenty of the curious information that speaking about the cursed at the star.
Basically, the symbol of the cursant and stars was used in medieval era but gained the widest popularity after appearing on the flag of Otman Empire, and it's end up with flags of number of other nations and states. At the end of 20th century, a variation of this symbol and the shape of a cursant became widespread as a symbol of Islam. However, many followers of Islam reject this symbol, believing that it is not original and that it was associated with this religion by mistake. So based with this information, we are dealing with very ancient and ambiguous symbol. Concerning the question of connecting between the symbol and Islam, it is really interesting for me personally. The association is quite firmly rooted. However, all the sources on this topic that I checked claim that the sample originally was not connected with Islam. Like when we go to this website, it is obvious that they don't accept it as a symbol of Islam. Either way, there are still a lot of questions related to the sample that we have to answer.
If you've been studying history for a long time, [music] then most likely you've been encounter some uh animal about the existence or the concepts of empires like the Otman Empire, Roman, or Mongol, or any of the ancient empires. So many searchers have repeatedly proved that such a concepts are historical falsification, which mean that these empires doesn't exist and they created these empires as a way to conceal information about the existence of some great unified state in the past. and they cover these fragments of the past empire and those fabricated empires. So there has many evidence that generally accepted that the timeline has been artificially stretched back as much as 1,000 years. Perhaps you think otherwise, and this is your right. But as you are watching this video, I advise you to keep this information in your mind.
At the beginning, we said that this symbol, it has a lot of information about the past. So why we don't take the advantage of this and try to sort out the historical confusion, even if you tend to adhere to the established historical position. It will be even more interesting as all the symbols and the images provided later. And just to know, like all the resources are official historical resources, and it will be all included in the description. So basically, let's assume that we know nothing about existence of any proto states of the past. How can the symbol of the curse and the star help us find the truth? [music]
Basically, that symbol of the cursant is a personification of moon and sun in very distant times. So based on how they present this information about this symbol, we can conclude that it began to play significant role only after being put on the flags of the Otman Empire. We are also suddenly hinted that this symbol is something more eastern than western. And if it is found somewhere else, not in the east, then it was long ago and not true, or that is just a coincidence. Well, let's take a look at this photo. It depicts a greenhouse and some building behind him in Brazil of 1860 and 1870. Most people would conclude that the building in the background is just some Muslim mosque. Although Islamic mosques are not what you are normally expect to see in 19th century in Brazil. To complete the picture, it should probably be said that even nowadays, according to the official statistics, the number of Muslims in Brazil does not exceed 1% of the population. Moreover, according to the old same official sources, the first Islamic mosque in Brazil was opened in 1929 in Sao Paulo. But the point here is not even the mosque, if it is mosque at all. The enlarged fragment reveals some curious symbols to us. The first thing that stands out are the five-pointed [music] stars on the top. If this building was indeed a mosque, then these stars would seem foreign there. And don't they say that this symbol is conjunction with person appeared in Islam by mistake and only at the end of the 20th century? Another thing to notice are the two big eight-pointed stars. What are they doing there? They shouldn't be there in this phone. But if it is not an Islamic mosque and not a religious building, then what culture stood behind of that construction?
Now, let's take a look at this photo. So, what you think it's a mosque or a church? The description of the image saying that this is a mosque, but take a closer look. Uh, can you can see there is a cross between the two pillars. So, what a cross going to do and a Muslim mosque? If at this stage you are already confused, then I'm afraid that the following image may confuse you even more. So take a look. >> [music] >> All the four paintings share the same plot. A plot that tells about the birth of Jesus and about a certain delegation of sagas who came to this event from the east in order to bring some gifts. So there is different translation for this event. So I have outlined the main details. We will not touch upon the issue of the story and the other settles associated with the religion at this moment. We are only interested in the depicted symbols and their affiliation. [music]
So let's imagine for a moment that we don't know the depiction of these images or paintings and just look at them and let your eyes depicted what you are seeing. We see some important events and people that gathered around it. But all paintings focus on the fact that a certain delegation arrived at the scene. We also see that all the people look the same, both ethnically and in terms of how they are dressed. All this tell us that they are people of a same culture and once probably same nation. However, we also see that the delegation arrived with flags and that it came from somewhere far away. It is obvious that if they were local, they would come there with flags. And since they came from somewhere with flags, we can conclude that they represent another nation, which means that at that time there already some kind of split between people, even if it was not so obvious from the scene. I think you'll agree that if we don't know the plot of the scene and looked at the version of it where no flags are depicted, we would never guess that it is tells about different nations or even different cultures or religions. But it is precisely this interpretation that the official history is trying to present to us. They seem to be trying to convince us that there has always been one culture in the west and another in the east, and they have a confrontation all the time, like it is something we can't escape from it, kind of absolutely nature. And we can see that from many paintings here. So the images shown demonstrate various episodes of fear of confrontation between two certain sides. All of them show flags and symbols of their religion or their aity. It is believed that all these wars were part of a global confrontation between [music] west and east, as they say nowadays. All of these wars are divided by official history into different periods. So there is a war against Arab Khalifhat in the 7th to 8th centuries, and the crusaders of the 11th to 13th centuries, and the war with the Otman between [music] the 16th to the 18th century. The official history has described the events of the last thousand years in such confusion way that it is almost impossible for any ordinary person to figure out all the confusion alone. So there's a war against the Arab khifhat between the 7th to 18th centuries, and the crusaders, they have their campaigns to the holy land between the 11th to the 13th century, and the wars with the old man empires between the 16th and the 18th century. So when the history described all these events, you feel this kind of confusion that almost impossible for any ordinary person to figure out what's going on here. I don't know if that happened on purpose, or I don't know, like sometimes you need to jump to conclusions, but if you're going to ask me about my opinion, what you can say about all of that, like, do you think this is just kind of uh a normal mistakes? And the reason that I'm saying that, because if that's something normal and real things that document it, it will be really quick for people to understand what's going on. But unfortunately, all these arguments are powerless against the huge hysterical machine and the replicating program in the minds of people. As I stated earlier, our weapon against the lies are symbols. So symbols maybe can help us to discover what is the lies and what is maybe can lead us to some kind of truth.
So again, look at the image of the seal of King Richard. And by the way, before we continue, I'd like to make a short remark. The seal of the king of England is not some useless artifact. It is a very important item associated directly with the head of the state. According to the official website of the royal family of Great Britain, the tradition of making royal seals began in the 11th century and continues to this day. These seals are used by monarchs to approve various documents instead of signing them. This seal is unique and made in a single copy. So someone will probably say, okay, they put some ancient pagan symbols on it. So what is the deal here? However, I want to remind you that this is the seal of the Richard the First, who personally participated into the battle of Arsu in 1191, in the midst of the crusaders. He fought the troops of Saladin, who was the leader of Muslim military campaign against the crusaders, and Saladin was also a sultan of Egypt and Syria. Though, if you're going to ask my personal opinion, he looks like some Vic sage rather than a sultan. Or maybe our knowledge about their appearance in the past is greatly distorted. According to data from Wikipedia, this battle became one of the largest and most important for crusaders because the one who will beat the other side will manage the region of control of Mediterranean coastal strip. Then why would Richard the First put the symbol used by his enemies on his steel? Well, you say that he or the people back then didn't know anything about the Muslims against whom they waged war. So I think this is simply impossible, at least because according to all the same sources, in 1188, in England and partially French, the so-called Salahin tax was introduced in order to raise funds for another crusades against the Muslims who in 1187 dared to oust Christians from Jurism. As for Ritual the First and his seal, it should be said that he ascended the throne in 1189. So there is no way he couldn't know about the major events that were happening in the world. Let's assume that Richard the First was just weird and for some unknown reason decided to borrow the symbol of the crown's enemies. But what should we do about this? Pay attention to the floor. The eight-pointed stars are clearly visible on the floor. The same stars that are usually put on the flags along with cursins. How come the empire directly and indirectly involved in a year's long war against Muslims is laying tails with enemy symbols in the very heart of the capital? After all this, this is one of the main temples in London. People walking there could well have personally participated in their crusades. Did they really not question those symbols when they saw them? Either this symbol was much more important than it is presented to us now, or this temple was built much earlier than stated in official sources. Currently, there is no such tale in the temple, and instead of it, a black and white mosaic is laid out. How long ago it was removed, I don't know. But under the cathedral, there is underground floor called the crypts. And there the tails are more interesting, perhaps even original.
So a skeptical listener may think that all this some kind of misunderstanding. I say something like, well, these are just stars. Different stars were drawn everywhere and all the time with one or two rays, more or less. What's the difference now? And the moon or the sun looms in the sky all the time. Why not draw them somewhere? But I'm afraid it is never that simple when we are dealing with symbols. So, for example, let's take a look at this image. It's a Sumerian photo, and we can see, okay, this is the sun. Uh, this is something else, like sphere or something. And we can see the cursing there. And again, when we come and see the image of the crucification of Jesus. So the question is, what is that? Again, we have this image here, or let's say painting. So most people would not even pay attention to the depicted symbols. But even when you are noticed them and try to figure out their meaning, it is extremely difficult without the appropriate context. So let's try to take something less abstract. For example, all the same battles between the crusaders and Muslims. Since these events were resonant, there are quite a lot of corresponding paintings and prints left. And most importantly, looking at them can reveal what is happening. In order to understand not just what is happening, but rather what is really happening, we will focus on the symbols. This is an image for the battle of Yermok, and it was between the Byzantine Empire and the Islamic Khalifhat in the 636. So it was before like 14th century. So it was taken from a book titled, and it's written by a certain historapher. His name is Heon Coryakus. And let's check this image too. So everything seems to be corresponded to the accepted concept. Also, in fact, you should have already been alarmed by the fact that the crusaders have a star on their flag, similar to the one that is inscripted in the cursent. And let's look further. So, let's take a moment here. What is this? The same knights crusaders that just had a different flag in the previous image, suddenly hold the flag of those against whom they are fighting. Maybe it's some kind of mistake, and these are Arabs under the helmets. Judging by this one, we can conclude that there is no mistakes. The symbol on the right flag deserves additional attention. The following image reveals presence of the cursor symbol at both sides, which completely excludes possibility of any confusion with the sides. And look at the shield of that warrior on the I guess they are the Muslim side at the same time. Look at the flag. And if we are checking this image, we will find a curious symbol on the right flag. Here you can see the very same sample in one of the prints taken from chronicles of John Skyllets, a Greek historian who lived in the 11th century. The description of this illustration say that is depicted the sake of the Syria city in Isaal by the Byzantine army and the subsequent counterattack from the Arabs. So the Arab have exactly the same spiral-shaped symbol on their shield as in the previous image. Okay, some people may say that one book doesn't prove anything. Maybe we should check other sources, and that's exactly what I did. And if you are interested, uh, there's a book titled, and it has a lot of interesting illustrations depicting from the crusades. The following print, for instance, shows us one of the biggest events of those times, the siege of Jerusalem by Saladin in 1187, which results in crusaders defeating. Even though this illustration does not contain the so symbols except for the tops of the buildings in the form of cursets, which can be attributed to the business of Muslim there. Even before the arrival of the Christians, it once again shows us that from the ethnic point of view, Saladine troops were no different from those against whom they fought. Even the style of the clothing is generally the same. So if you are interested in the aspect related to the symbols, then we should address other sources related to this event. And both of the following illustrations depict the desired symbol of the different variation. So we can see the recapture of Jerusalem in 1887 by Saladin and gave by Jan Lukan in 1683, and we can see here the symbol on the tent on the left, the tent of Saladin, and there's here another illustration from this book, and we can see the symbol can be seen on the red flag on the left. Regarding this particular cases, it should be said that those versions of books that are uploaded to digital libraries have no illustrations for some reasons. [music] Heat. [music] Heat. There are only few of them in the digital archives of the national library of Great Britain, especially here. So basically, they didn't upload all the illustration in some way. I don't know what the reason for that. But let's back to the images from this book. And if you look at this one, does it have anything else to deserve our attention? It turns out that this book has some inconvenience fact as well. For some reasons, the crusaders are carrying flag with a cursant. And here it is simply impossible to confuse the sides. They even have a leader carrying a huge wooden cross in his hands. So I wonder why he even need it.
When you check this Wikipedia page, then you have probably noticed that it doesn't hide from us the presence of this symbol and the medieval age of the European states. And maybe we can check those images too. >> [music] >> So the historian didn't deny the presence of such symbols in old Jerobian age. They didn't try to explain how all these symbols appeared on the coasts of the arms and flags of ancient states and on the coast of the arms and flags of states that for centuries fought against each other on the basis of religion and number of other geopolitical factors. The argument that at a certain point in history one side just borrowed the symbol from the other sounds extremely nonsense. If as we are told there was a cultural abuse and violence between the two sides, then why on earth would someone suddenly begin to adopt the symbols of his enemy? And if these symbols were close to people from both sides of the conflict to such high degree that even years long wars didn't discourage them from revolving them from their flags and codes of arms, then maybe there was something that united all these people at one time. Perhaps before the start of the war, people lived within the framework of one civilization, culture, you name it. And before we are developing this idea, look at this image. So this is the map of uh Vienna during the siege of Turks in 1529. And I will leave for you the link also in the description. So under the name of Turks, they assume that the Otma Empire surrounded the city twice. The first try occurred in uh 1529, and the second one in 1683. Both attempts to capture the city failed. At first, everything seems to fit into the standard concept. We see how the Turks enter the city with their usual flags, but the entire established narrative is crumbling over one small detail located at the top of San Steven Cathedral. And if you zoom in, you can see again, we have the cursent and the eight-pointed stars on the top of the cathedral. So take into account, even recording the official story, the city had never been captured by Atma Empire or any other invaders from the east. You can't say that this symbol was installed by someone else apart from the local citizens. But what conclusion can we draw from this, since the symbol was there originally? First, the fact that it was instilled on the main temple of the city in one of the largest cultural centuries of Europe tells us that the cursant and star was not just some bacon attribute that accidentally migrated to flags of the military formation, but rather than an important state symbol, since it was chosen to be placed in the most prominent place in the city. Secondly, the fact that this is a temple and not just some kind of administrative building, reveals the connection of this symbol with the ideological views of people of that time, which also give additional signifies to the symbol. It should be said that the temple from Vienna is not the only example of the star and cursant appearing at the place where people do not accept to see it. In St. Pittsburgh Heritage Museum, there is a curious artifact called Alexander Naviski tome. This artifact is decorated with the thematic relief depicting the most important event of his life. One of the reliefs shows that the moment when Alexander Neveski entered Biskov and liberated from the Levonian order in 1242. We are looking at this particular one because it demonstrate all the same symbols of the cursed stars, one on the top of the city buildings. I suspect that there may be more much examples, but I have cited only those that I found myself in the process of the preparing for this video.
Now that you've seen enough evidence of the presence of this sil both in the west and in the east, let's try to find out why the symbol being so significant and widespread as we have found it out is both by the official historical science in such a ambiguous position. Why do we have to make so much efforts to find traces of it is use even where it had always been in the most prominent places? Why are historians not trying to highlight the obvious connection between all the available facts of the use of the symbol while completely concealing some of those facts? In order to partially clarify those circumstances, we will return to the case of St. Steven Stan's Cathedral in Vienna. And 1686, at 3 years after the second siege of the city by the Turks Otman, the cursed and star symbol was removed from the cathedral stop, and a two-headed eagle with a cross was nestled in the place. In addition to the obvious fact of replacing one symbol with another, there was something astonish, or rather ceremonial. In order to understand what I'm talking about, you'll need to see the following print. It depects the cursed moon with the eight-point start removed from the very top. But the most important thing here is the inscription that they contemptuously wrote on the cursen along with an image of the figure sign, as it is barely readable here. Let's look at the real artifact. The very star and the curs that once towered over the cathedral. Fortunately, it has survived and is currently located at one of the museums in Vienna. The description has Sleman Memorial 2 can be translated as this is for you Sleman. From the museum comments, we learn some new details that immediately rises suspicion. It turns that they know the exact day of the cursing and stars installation on the cathedral, which was 28th of July 1519. But the original meaning of this symbol is not clear to them. They have only guesses that it could be symbolize the relationship of spiritual and secular power, where the pope is a star and the emperor is the cursen, or as it is familiar to us, it is just a moon and star. Moreover, according to their version, just a year after the first siege of Vietnam, the city council sent a request to the emperor, and apparently it is Ferdinand the First, to replace this symbol with the figure of St. George. However, only 156 years in 1686, the cursant and star was replaced by cross with two-headed eagle, which was done as a part of fulfilling a certain oath given by the emperor. Apparently Leo pulled the First during the second siege of the city, and uh, to be honest, I wonder why he took this oath and who made him do it. So the museum comments also state that it was said both in Vienna and Otman Empire that the symbol was mounted on the tower by order of the Sultan, and apparently it is Sultan Sleman. Their story immediately raises a number of the questions. First, does it seem strange to you that the given date of installation of the person and star is so suspicially closest to the date of the first siege? So, it turns out that the symbol stood only 10 years before they decided to remove it. So, it looks like as if they intentionally tried to regenerate it. So the people in that case would come to an idea that there was some kind of religious cult or ideology in Europe associated with this symbol since ancient times. And secondly, why did they have to ask for the emperor permission to change the symbol? And more important, why did they drag out this question for 156 years if they want to replace it so eagerly? Was it really that difficult? Or maybe people didn't want the symbol to removed from the top of the cathedral. Or maybe, as a third option, that in 1530, no one asked anyone for anything, and they tell us about it in order to create a false impression of the rejection for that symbol and by the population of the city. Thirdly, how can they say that the symbol was installed by order of Siman if they themselves write in the very texts that symbol was installed 10 years before the first siege with notion that the city was never being conquered anyway. These comments are uncontrally to common [music] sense and are clearly written for narrow-minded uneducated people. But either way, the curse on star was removed, and it is disputable fact. Asking the question of why they remove it, a person will probably come to the following explanation. People saw the symbol among the enemy who came to seize their homeland. So they questioning the need of having a similar symbol at top of the main cathedral of their city, and logically they should have tried to find explanation of this similarity and symbols. It is quite possible that the historical memory of those people had already been lost. So they continually develop hatred toward this symbol after the attempt of invading their city. What hunts me the most is the fact that the story is known to limited number of people. Even worse, this is just one of those cases that I managed to and earth, but there could be and most likely there were much more of such a case both in Europe and around the world.
As speaking about the whole world, I'm not exaggerating at all. Various independent historical researchers have repeatedly come to conclusion that the south proto state spread almost over the entire planet. In the 16th century, there is an outl uh in the description. So I found very strong argument. So we can see these images, and it is in the south coast of the current US territory, which can be easily identified by Florida and Yokatan Peninsula. The names of which are written on the map. And here is a part of today's Canada from the same atlas. It is apparently east coast, to be precise. I think that symbol depicted in the atlas do not need comments. I think that we can see the same symbol has been debucted. And what your explanation about that? So from that, we should understand everything, and it should be more obvious to everyone what kind of culture was behind the creation of the strange religious building in Brazil in the 19th century, as well as number of other old buildings in the north and South America. At first glance, it may seem that there is no clear evidence left, but if you do some digging, you may find very curious photos. So, we can see that photo, and it's written on it, California State Building. And uh, the photo taken in the late 1950s. Another photo, and we can see the person over there. Uh, it's in the main street of Springfield, Massachusetts, and it was taken in the 1950s. Unfortunately, such photos are rare, but at least we have something. It should be said that the buildings and the given photos are important not in terms of their construction date, but rather in terms of the symbol that were placed on them. The information about their past has to be collected bit by bit. Someone clearly did not want and still didn't want people to know about the genius symbols of the old civilization. Therefore, ever since then, they are being methodically erasing from history, especially in those places where they would have caused more question. Somehow the symbol is simply removed from all the sources, as somehow they replaced the historical facts associated with what their stories appearance to us, and somehow it distorted the appearance of the symbol itself, as happened with a Polish noble code of arms called liiliva, as you can see it now in this picture.
Let's go back to the question of relationship between all the facts of using person and star. How do we put everything we know into one big picture? What do you think unites all the considered facts? So obviously the people and the territory, even though they were artificially separated. And what separates these facts? There is only one answer. History has been stretched for about one or 2,000 years on a chronological scale, including the so-called before the Christ period. If you use this magic formula and pull the timeline inward, everything immediately fits and becomes clear. If we imagine that all the evidence and the artifacts we have considered took place at approximately the [music] same time, then we will see a complete picture of events. So think deeper and answer the following question. What symbols are usually found simultaneously on flags, cos of arms, money, and culture? As for me, the answer is obvious. The most important state [music] symbols. This symbol has been greatly distorted and erased from our history for one single reason. It was the symbol of those who lost the war, and as you know, the history is written by the willers. But what kind of war was it? And what kind of forces that has been used to destroy the ancient world and its culture? To try answering this question, we are going to follow some leads, and one of them is the book of the miracles. [music] >> [music] >> Opinions on what is depicted in this illustration differ. Some people, they think this is kind of delusional visions, and others, they assume that this is kind of evidence on a global catastrophe, which is mentioned in various legends and sacred texts from around the world. So the first opinion is quite obvious, and I think this is for the majority of the people. So how about to dig in [music] the second opinion?
Before moving forward into the next part of this video, the deep dive in into the book of miracles, there is an important warning. If you don't want to learn more about the true nature of symbols and how they may fundamentally change the way you see the world and the reality around you, I advise you to stop watching here. If you choose to continue, [music] then what follows is your personal choice. I will give you a few seconds of silence to decide. Now, since you are still here, so let's dive in. The book consists of many odd illustrations, each of them being interesting in its own way, and here's some of the examples. [music] [music] >> [music] >> Almost all the restoration in the book demonstrate some kind of pedestrian. graphy accompanied by the fall of celestial bodies, the destruction of the cities, the presence of unusual features, and other odds. But now I will show you one that stand out from all the others. Familiar symbols, aren't they? The image clearly depicts some kind of battle between two sides. But the book is not about war at all. It's about an end day cataclysm, or maybe all of these is directly connected, and it was during this particular cataclysm that the outcome of all the further events was determined. So let's take a look about, so let's take a look on more images from this book. [music]
Sounds weird, huh? In addition to the obvious confrontation of some two sides during this cataclysm, we were hinted that all this happened both on land and sky. But what attracted my attention was the presence and number of the illustration of bright celestial bodies in the amount of exact three spheres. [music] While these celestial objects may be mistaken for suns at first look, for obvious reasons, we know that they are not. As we learned from the mainstream education, there is only one star in our solar system, and two more could not materialize out of nowhere. Another assumption could be that the illustration depicted the explosion of some bombs charged in the atmosphere, like uh nuclear. This sounds much more believable [music] since they would emit the same bright light as the sun. Also, I have no doubt that some of these illustration indeed depect some of clusters of the energy. I still tend to think that depiction of three spherical celestial objects means something else. And this something, in my opinion, is an image of three moons. Those very three moons that could have been repeatedly heard of from various ancient legends. So why I'm sure about that they are just the three moons, because I've already seen them in other places. So take a look at these images. >> [music] [music] >> All the same old coats of arms. The presence of three cursants, spheres, moons on such a large number of coats of arms cannot be simple coincidence. [music] But if you still have doubts as to whether there are three moons orbit around the earth, take a look at the following image taken from a book. I will show you the name on the screen, and that book was in the 14th century. >> [music] [music] >> The samples on the highlighted shields very much resemble the orbits of the celestial objects. It is not difficult to compare all the information and [music] understand that these orbits belong to the three moons. If you haven't stopped believing in coincidence yet, now it is high time. In the meantime, I will show you another strange symbol of object that is found both in theber book of miracles and the old herd, and actually many more places. [music] [music] So if you do your own search on the internet, you will mostly like the mentioning of the old testament prophet Iskel [music] who is famous for describing unusual divine vision called by the term meraba or meava. It is interesting that from Hebrew meaba is translated as chariot. Also, the association of the symbol with a wheel of the same chariot, for example, is firmly rooted in our minds. I suspect that initially there was a greater meaning of all these. Maybe the following images will tell us more about that. [music] >> [music] >> So we can see there's different kind of coins, French coins in the seventh centuries, and also we have this image looks pretty weird, right? So I don't know what we are seeing in these pictures, but I personally see a certain aircraft. If you take it into account all these strange celestial phenomenon in the restoration of the book, then the presence of high thick eyecraft there does not seem impossible. But what about other sources? We cannot draw clear conclusion from a single book. For that we have other sources, and one of them is that book that I'm going to put its name. So the book described supposedly ordinary comets at the first illustration. It seems to be corresponded to that title. But the further we go into the book, the weirder the images becomes. [music] Once again, we see the appearance of three luminous spheres, as in the book of miracles. Moreover, the left illustration has the flying object marked with the sword, which obviously resemble its military use, and the right one shows a whole city burning. Apparently, it was already destroyed by one of these harmless comets. When we go further, we can see that the two illustration depict either an explosion or one of the spheres moon surrounded by some energy. The second one has a strange object that stand out from everything we saw before. Could it be a missile? The third illustration deserve special attention. To say that it is a meteo shower means to say nothing. The round object is clearly some kind of aircraft. Maybe it is the very merkava in action. The horseman in the cloud symbols nothing else but a battle in the sky. So I think the authors probably had to present information in slightly vague form to avoid potential censorship. There are two other notable illustration in the book. So we can see on the left illustration, like without a doubt, there is one moon, but what is happening with it? It is conserting some kind of energy field around itself. And the other astration deserve even more attention. The majority of people will most likely think that is another flying object. [music] But what if it is also one of the moons? A moon that captured the moment when it was being shot at with some super weapon, or at the moment when the moon itself was doing it. Let's leave this as an inception for now and try to figure out that messiah or what looking like this. You are probably wondering if there are any other books or illustration showing similar objects. So the other proof exists that we will see them right now. So we can see that some of the images showing in dot similar like a missile launch, and it is presented in a book titled. Next book, shedding light on missile as well as the phenomena discussed earlier in this book by Connard Lyus or Connard Wolfhart in the 1557. Once again, all the same images of three moons, two opposite sides, and some kind of cataclysm. So let's look further. We see that for some reason there is a crucififor mark on one of the moves. We could it be symbolized a mark target? And by the way, we saw that before in the book of miracles. So the alternate strations show a moon that shot a certain projectile and fire. And the last one shows how two shells of unknown type of flies up to the moon from two sides. It looks like they were waiting for this blow and turned on some kind of force field to reflect the strike. Something similar, but probably more veiled in the book of miracle. It cannot be coincidence that they draw sword light under the circle and the moon surrounded by some colored spheres that look like force field. It is also possible that this is force field was used for both defense and offensive purposes. Meanwhile, we will continue to study illustration from other sources. The next books is titled by Yulio obscures. Once again, the same formula as before is repeated. Three moons, a catastrophe, missiles, flying ships, and some dragons like creatures. It should be noted that three moons could have been in the Earth orbit for a long time. So they didn't have to appear on the horizon right at the moment of the given catastrophe. Moreover, catastrophes with the use of weapons currently unknown to us could happen more than once, and different disasters could all be described at different times. We also can't know for sure how long that last large scale conflict lasted. It could last for several years or just one day. However, we should take into account that the fact that after the last disaster, which most likely happened several centuries ago, our history was completely distorted. And if some have true description of the past have preached us, then mostly likely they were created at the same period as the catastrophe. This assumption is also supported by the suspicious similitary between all the restoration. Either way, there is one more source of information that I want to show you and [music] it's book titled. In this book, we can see a new element, a rectangular shape. We can see a text written in English saying comet 1744. I just need you to remember that one, because in the future we are going to explain more about this topic. So, let's continue with the other restorations. And we have more images. So, let's take a look at them. [music] The illustrations are notable for the depiction of the very energy emanating from the spheres in the form of souls. Previously, we saw these phenomena separate, either just energy that appeared as a trail of flying object, or just a sword next to an object with no full trajectory displayed. But now we see that the spheres is the source of energy, and it is direct this energy in the form of a sword. Obviously, using it as a weapon. Confirmation of this can be found in following illustration, some of which have already been shown earlier in different drawing styles. Once again, we see missiles, dragon moons that shoot energy and defend themselves. And the last illustration looks particularly strange in theory. These are exactly the same moons. But what do these odd drawing on their surface mean? I hope that some of the audience will be able to see what I could not notice and will answer this question. But what happens to these moons? Now we have only one moon. Where have the other two gone? The only conclusion that I can draw from these images and the information that I came across during my research is that they were destroyed, or one was destroyed and the other flew away in unknown direction. It is very difficult to say when exactly all that happened and in which sequence. We will inevitably come to conclusion that the mortal humans clearly were not the only participant in that global conflict. Possess technology like missiles and some kind of aircraft should not seem impossible to people with an alternative view of the events of the past. But the huge celestial bodies like Mars shooting energy beams clearly could not be controlled by human civilization. There is no doubt that these objects are under the juristic higher powers. However, it is up to you to decide who they will really are. But the possible option are limited. So in conclusion, we can see [music] there is kind of a celestial conflict happen in the past, and that lead to destroy our ancient civilization, or the civilization that we used to call it Tertaria, or whatever the name that you want to call it. However, this war has been lead by different factions, and of course, these factions has their own interest agenda, and apparently the cursant was assembled or the faction that it was dominating the earth in that time. But still, we don't know who they are, and where all this technology came from. The mainstream history didn't tell us all of that. Maybe on purpose, or maybe they just forget it. To be honest, I don't know. But all these images and illustrations in these different books show us something not match with the story that they told us. For that, I'm encouraging everyone to do your own research, because that type of work, it needs everyone to participate and share the results with everyone. What we are doing as a researchers is collecting as much as possible from these fragments and connecting them and share it with everyone, because this is the only way to build a map about what happened before. So maybe that is going to help us to understand our present and how it will lead us in the future. So enlightening the mind is really needed an effort, and [music] we can see that many of these authors that they are wrote these books, they tried to pass to us many illustrations and many symbols in a way that one day a generation can understand [music] them and decrypted them. So please don't let their efforts gone in the [music] wind, and let's help each other to understand what was happening really in the past. Thank you everyone for your watching. Please share your ideas, and I hope we can meet again in another research journey.