Hebrew Israelites Have HEATED DEBATE With Christian Evangelist @VocabMalone and @KPSERVES

[Music]

What's going on, everybody? Welcome to a little special edition today. Usually, we don't do the Thursday streams, but today I wanted to do something fun with my man's Cab. He's going to be joining in just a few minutes.

There was this video going around that we wanted to react to and respond to, where an evangelist by the name of KP, who's actually a subscriber to this channel, follows me on Instagram, and everything—we follow each other. I love this brother's content. KP serves, and he's doing an amazing job when it comes to his evangelism, spreading the gospel, preaching the unadulterated word of God.

You know, when it comes to the LGBTQ community, when it comes to atheism, he's just out there preaching, giving the gospel, going up to people with his mic, and getting them to think about the gospel and planting seeds. His ministry is extremely effective. This time, he ran into some Hebrew Israelites, and he's a black brother, by the way, too, so they actually had a conversation with him. Because he's from the tribe of Judah, he was able to get a few words in, you know?

But man, it was an interesting dialogue, an interesting conversation. So I thought, who else to do a reaction to and watch this with other than the man himself, who I would say is the lead apologist when it comes to dealing with Hebrew Israelites, and that is Vocab Malone.

Now, I do have to say he is on "caffer time." He is on "caffer time," so you know, caffers, they never really show up on time to the stream. You know what I'm saying? I mean, I'm always a few minutes late to my own stream, you know? So he's on "caffer time," so he'll be here in a few minutes.

But that does give us a few minutes to get you guys in here to like the stream, to share the stream. You guys know what to do. Make sure you guys are hitting the like button. Make sure you guys are sharing the stream. Hit the like button so that people can know we are live. It does help with the algorithm.

I see Radar Apologetics in the chat. Radar, if you want to come too, man, you're more than welcome to join. Just text me, and I'll send you the link if you want to join, brother. So just let me know if you want.

But yeah, this would actually be a great stream for you to respond to as well, for you to react to, get some of that rabbi input. It would be beautiful. You know, they go over some Acts 21. Does James go against Paul? You know, touching on certain traditions of the Jews.

And you know, they said some crazy stuff, guys. They said some crazy stuff. I got some timestamps, man. I got some timestamps.

Al, some of y'all recognizing the cut? Some of y'all recognizing the cut? What is that up there in the ceiling? I didn't know the ceilings were so high in here. It's crazy. You know what? And then there's rails up there. That's wild. I didn't even know this. The little pottery over there in the cut, that's crazy, man. And then back here, got some painting and stuff. That's pretty good. That matches everything. That's pretty good right there.

You know, that's all good. Yeah, man, I'm humble, man. You know, I wasn't even going to say nothing about the cut, and I wasn't going to say nothing, you feel me? But you know, I just had to pop up with something.

Anyway, make sure you guys hit the like button if you like the cut, man. Shoot, hit the like button if you like the fresh cut, man. Go and subscribe.

Again, thank you to all who support the ministry financially. All you guys who are joining Patreon every day, I really appreciate you guys. Had a few new patrons yesterday. So if you guys want to become a member, go ahead and subscribe. All the links are in the description of the video.

You can— it really helps out. Like I said, it helps fund the mission trips, like the London trip, going to Speaker's Corner, you know, going to New York in August. And I plan on also going to Canada and doing some hunting there in Canada before the year is out this year. So we are traveling, we are traveling, and we are getting out there, especially where the DA is hot. So we're going to show up and just say hi to our DA friends.

But it's because of y'all's support, because of your love, because of the way that God blesses you, then you guys bless the ministry. That is what makes all of this a reality. So thank you for being a part of this ministry. It's not just me; it's all of us. God Logic is going to be everywhere.

All right, so thank you guys so much. I appreciate you. We got a super chat here from Aaron. He says, "Love your content. Would love to see a video explanation on Matthew 27:5 and Acts 11:18." It sounds like that's talking about Judas.

So I think I do have a video explanation talking about Judas. It's actually a short, so it's really easy. Even a kid came up and asked about Judas. So if I'm not mistaken, that sounds like those are the Judas verses about how he died. So he died, you know, he hung himself, then he fell, and his guts burst out after being dead, hanging himself.

But yeah, if you want to see that, there's a short that I do have on the channel. Just go to my shorts section, and you'll see me in the conversation with a kid. I forgot what the title of it is exactly, but you can see it's just how did Judas die? So go to my short section, and I break that down pretty easily for the kid.

But yeah, let's see here. So yep, just giving him a little bit more time. But yeah, let me show you guys KP's channel. Let me show you KP's channel and make sure you guys go ahead and subscribe and support the brother because he's doing amazing, amazing work for the kingdom. He's doing amazing work.

So let me share my screen and show you guys KP's channel really quick. So this is it right here, KP Serves. Right here, he's got 9,000 subscribers. This is the brother right here. So he does a lot. He deals a lot with street evangelism. If you guys really love interaction, like that IRL content, you know, that IRL Christian content where he's going out in the streets talking to real people and different kinds of people too, man.

As you see, like so many different types of people. And what's good about his ministry is that in his conversations, you actually see people's minds change. Like it's not just fruitless. People's minds are changing when he talks to these people. So definitely check him out.

Check him out. This is his channel right here. So check him out, everybody. Go ahead and subscribe if you can to KP Serves. Doing really good work, man. We got to support our Christian brothers and sisters who are on the front lines like this. We got to support them. I'm extremely proud of them.

So here's his link right here. Let me just put—actually, let me put subscribe. Oops, how do I do that? Let me go ahead and put subscribe. Did I just stop sharing my—? I gotta learn these hotkeys. There we go. I gotta subscribe too. I thought I was subscribed already. I was just watching the homie's stuff. Shoot, I was just watching the homie's stuff.

But yeah, everybody, let's subscribe, man. Let's get him up to 10,000 subs if we can this stream. He's at 9,000 subscribers. Let me make it bigger. He's at 9,000 subscribers. Let's try to get him up to 10,000 subscribers this stream.

But these dudes really made a bunch of horrible arguments, man. Horrible, you know, the usual Hebrew Hopscotch, the usual Hebrew Shuffle. And these dudes just like that clown that we had on this channel, that dude Deacon who came on this channel was a mus brew. These brothers were some mus brews, man. They were some Muslim Hebrew Israelites rejecting Paul's letters, rejecting Paul's writing, saying Paul doesn't know what he's talking about.

So they were some real mus brews out here, man. Some Muslim Hebrews. It's embarrassing the way that they cherry-pick Paul, how they want to say that Paul is good in one sense, and then the next, oh yeah, Paul didn't know what he was talking about here. So how could you trust anything he said, man? How could you trust anything the man was saying?

So you know what? If he—I'm G, just go ahead and get into the video, man. He said five minutes, man. It's been more than five minutes, big dude. Come on, man. This is getting ridiculous. So let me go ahead and start this so that we can get into this, man.

So make sure you guys hit the like button, like the stream. Sorry if my video glitches. You know, connection is not as strong, but as long as you guys can hear me, we're good. As long as you guys can hear me and my voice is clear, that is all that matters.

Yeah, so let's go ahead and get into the video. Yeah, and let's see what they were talking about right here. So I encourage everyone—we're not going to watch the entire video, but I encourage everyone to go ahead and watch the original video. We're going to go through certain parts. Everybody, watch the actual video. Go to his channel and watch it.

What up, man?

Hey, what's up, man? How you doing?

How you doing?

Good, man. That was a long five minutes. That's crazy. These five minutes, boy, I tell you. That's "caffer time," I tell you.

Looks like somebody's chilling in the hotel.

Yeah, I'm out of town. I'm out of town. So, yeah, I'm not in my usual studio. Can you hear me good, though?

Yeah, yeah, man. I'm still getting settled after getting back from London, though, bro. That's what's going on.

Yeah, I'm still trying to get my head in order, you know?

Oh yeah, yeah. So you actually ran into some Hebrew Israelites in London?

Yeah, it wasn't like I just ran into them, you know what I mean? It was more like the predator. I went—

Yeah, you was doing what I was doing. You knew where they was, and you went to hunt them just like I was doing.

Doll hunt, you was doing exactly that. You was doing Hebrew HT.

But yeah, I knew some locations where some of the groups were, and there was some off time at the conference. I said, "Hey," and one of the times a couple people went with me. The other time nobody could go, so I was just sort of on a solo mission.

Yeah, eventually, man must face his destiny on his own, like when Luke Skywalker had to face Darth Vader. There was no Han, no Leia. It was just him and his destiny.

If you guys are not subscribed to Vocab's channel, man, if you guys don't know who this brother is, man, like I said before he came, he is the lead apologist when it comes to debunking and dealing with the Hebrew Israelites, right? Urban apologetics, this is what my brother does. So please head over there. Head to his channel. It's literally Vocab Malone.

Matter of fact, I need to actually put your thing in the title. I didn't do that.

Appreciate that.

Yeah, youtube.com/VocabMalone. The name of the show is Street Apologist. Although since I've been back from London, I haven't had time to go live. I've just been editing videos. I have so much footage from being over there, you know, YouTube too, I'm sure.

Yeah, yeah. When I got back, like the first week, I was not going live. I wasn't going live. I was just posting content, editing, and posting videos, dude, almost every day. That's what it was.

Yeah, so you're absolutely right about that.

Let me go ahead and put your name in the title here. But yeah, man, so we got this video here, man. And I went through it. I marked down some points that I would like for us to go over specifically. Did you get a chance to watch it in full?

Yes, I did. You know what city it was in? That's the one question I had, but I did watch it in full. I forget where the brother's from.

Hold on. I don't know the city. I know the state, though.

Okay, let me see if I can find out.

You know the state?

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Or he told me the state where—because I asked where he was from.

What's the state, then?

I'm trying to—let me load it up.

Oh, it's a secret?

Okay, I thought—

I thought it's not. I'm trying to—

I got it in the—

Okay, so Atlanta.

It's in Atlanta?

Oh yeah, well, that's interesting because I wonder if he was down there. You know, I couldn't tell the background. I didn't look into it like that, but they meet down there at Peachtree or whatever by the CNN Center, I guess.

And that's the headquarters now of Sakari is in Atlanta, right?

So he wasn't meeting with the main guys, but the main guys are in Atlanta. Specifically, the main guy, Alazar, I guess he wasn't there that day, or maybe he ran into a different side camp or something like that.

But Sakari's base of operations is now in Atlanta, Georgia. So that's where they started in San Diego and in Washington, but now Atlanta is their main spot.

But I'm glad that he ran into them. Did you already know him before this video?

Yeah, yeah, yeah. I'm in contact with him. He reacts to a lot of my content, so yeah, I'm familiar with him before this video.

Yep, I can't tell you, man, how many people sent me this video, though.

Oh, for real?

Oh yeah, oh yeah. You know, because they—yeah, I mean, the classic moment is at the end, right before he leaves. You just can't make up moments like that where someone, their mental block is so strong that they literally read the verse in line with their false presuppositions instead of just reading the verse for what it actually is.

I mean, it happened on camera and in real time. That's pretty—

On camera, in real life.

And it's funny because I was watching the reaction of the others, the other Hebrew Israelites. Were they going to say something? Were they going to speak up? You know, the actual reader, like he was stuck, like pointing at the verse, but he didn't want to say—he didn't want to correct his boy. That was so funny to me, man.

And these dudes will refuse. They say they stand on truth. They say they got all this. They stand on correction and all that kind of stuff, but they refuse to correct the dude when he was blatantly wrong on the scripture.

Well, I mean, I think it was a thing where the guys are sitting there. At least the one that knows, and he's like, "Maybe the Christians won't notice. I'm not going to say nothing right now. I'll let him know later, but hopefully the Christians don't notice."

Because what else is he going to do?

Yeah, yeah, that was tough. And he was loud, loud and wrong, Vocab. Loud and wrong.

Yeah, we call it strong and wrong. Strong and wrong, boy.

Yeah, pretty much. That's pretty much something they basically teach these guys out there. It's like the old classic joke about a Baptist pastor who's got a sermon notes, and he lays it down on the podium, and it goes to 0:03, and it says, "Point weak here, pound podium extra hard," you know, make up for it, cover up for it.

I think that's definitely what you saw. But the gentleman who did it, I think he did a great job dealing with them.

Yeah, yeah, he did. Didn't get flustered. He didn't get, like, you know, out of character. He stood his ground.

Let's get into it, man. Let's get into it.

FKS, ask—let's see what they were talking about.

All right, guys, here it is. Let me know if there's an echo too, by the way, because if I need to mute while we watch this—

Hey, Biden needs your money, bro. Take some of those super chats and give them to Biden.

Absolutely not, man. May pay for some of his hospital bills, but that's it.

It's my least favorite part of running for office. I know how hard you work, but if you can afford—

Would you consider yourself to be a Christian?

Yeah, Christian. I was a Christian at one point as far as following Christianity. Right now, the thing is, according to the Bible, they tell us something different than what Christianity actually taught me.

Right, what is that?

That we don't have to follow the commandments and that we just have to have faith in Christ.

Okay, when Christ himself told me in order to get into the kingdom, I have to keep the commandments.

So you keep them?

So I keep them.

Keep them all?

Yeah, that's why you see brothers with fringes on. That's why you see brothers with their beards. This is why, like, you having a beard is literally keeping the commandments because that's a commandment that God gave us. You feel me?

So you never fall short?

No.

What do you mean by falling short?

Like, you never miss the mark?

What's missing the mark?

'Cause the mark is an actual imprint in your hand according to what the Bible says.

Saying in the sense of you keep the law perfectly?

Yeah, I keep the law perfectly.

So tomorrow, if you don't, what's that—what happens?

I just want to point out, I don't—before you go too far, because I don't think a lot of people will catch one little thing that happened real quick there.

So they're obviously talking about sin, right, and law-keeping. And so he says, you know, we got to keep the law. You're keeping the law by your beard and all this, right? And he says, so you never miss the mark. He's given an accurate definition or picture of sin because that's a biblical picture idea. It comes from archery. The arrow falls short of the target. Very easy to understand.

But while they're saying that, the Hebrew Israelite, the Sakari guy, I don't know if people caught this, he says, "Well, the mark's an actual mark in your hand."

He's talking about the RFID chip.

Yeah, Sakari is real big because they came out of a group called GMS, right? And GMS comes out of the original school at One West Harlem. Their leader, Tahar, was back at the old school in Harlem, 125th Street, back in the 80s. And then Tahar started GMS after the school fell apart.

And then Alazar was once essentially a student of Tahar via long distance because he was a member of GMS. It was GMS San Diego. He had disagreements, whatever. But Alazar and Sakari have kept real strong the claim that the mark of the beast is the RFID chip.

And so the guy, once it's like once he heard "mark," he's like, "The mark is the actual mark in your hand." You know, they're not talking about that, obviously. I just want to let everyone know the strange elements of Hebrew ISM that sneak in. You know, he's talking about missing the marks, and he brings up the mark of the beast basically there because he said the mark in your hand.

That's what it's talking about. He was ready to defend that RFID chip.

Anyways, I just want people to know that because that's a big deal for GMS and Sakari is the mark of the beast is the RFID chip. No ifs, ands, or buts.

That is so silly to me.

Now we got KP Serves in the house, guys. He's in the comment section. He's watching. So shout out to you, brother. God bless you, man. I hit you up. Like you said, just let me know if you want to come on. You don't have to if you're busy, you know, walking around or whatever. But if you want to, just say the word. I can send you the link on Instagram, and you can pop right up with us.

But yeah, so let's go ahead and continue this video, man.

Oh yeah, by the way, guys, make sure you guys subscribe to KP Serves. I put his link in the comment section. Moderators, if you guys can go ahead and kind of spam that link throughout and also spam Vocab's link to his YouTube channel throughout the stream if you guys can for me, guys. Let's support these brothers.

All right, here we go.

Then I just don't break the law again.

Just— I mean, do you know how the law works?

Yeah, you have to keep it all of it.

Exactly.

So this is what I'm saying. If I have sex with my woman, right? Or let's say if a woman is on her M cycle, she has to bring a sin offering.

Why does she have to bring a sin offering?

Because she got to make an atonement for her cleanness.

So all sin or falling short don't mean that you're imperfect.

So blood equals life, right?

Yeah, Leviticus 17:11, it says how blood equals life, and it makes the atonement for the soul, right?

Exactly.

And we have the blood.

Do you have the blood or not?

Jesus' blood in Hebrews 9:12, it says Jesus entered the holy place one time to obtain eternal redemption, right?

And give me 10:26.

Let's see Hebrews 10:26. Ready, Avery?

Okay, so a lot just happened there. A lot just happened there. We need to kind of stop now. You know, he's out on the street, and he's doing a great job. You can tell he knows how to do street evangelism. You know, he's getting to the root of the issue. He's focusing on stuff, and he's bringing it to the forefront.

So that's exactly what you should do. These guys, though, they can't stay on any of that, right?

So a few interesting things. First of all, he gave the example of law-breaking about what his woman needs to do.

Yeah, yeah. You know, when I sin, you know, because when I have sex with my woman.

Now, first of all, notice how he didn't say wife.

Now, why don't you think he said wife? Just if you had a guess, any guesses out there in the audience? Why didn't he say wife?

Why did he say wife?

Man, they like to say woman because for them, sex equals marriage, and it gets real complicated real fast.

But it's also something that guys who are into polygamy tend to say. They tend to say woman instead of wife.

It's an interesting thing. I'm not saying these guys will never say wife, but they tend to say woman.

And there's these little verbage indicators that tell you about a greater problem in their theology, such as that lingo right there.

So Sakari believes you can have more than one wife. They do not believe, of course, that a woman can have more than one man.

But they do believe that you can have more than one wife, and it is, again, just sort of telling that the first sin he mentions is something his wife needs to do.

And you know, it's real hypocritical.

Let me tell you something here. If you look at the restrictions, for example, the high priest, he has to marry a virgin. She can never have been divorced. The high priest has real high standards for who his wife could be.

No indication that, you know, he's supposed to be a polygamist, but he can't have someone who's divorced, can't have somebody who's not a virgin, he can't have somebody who I think is even widowed.

And so there's these high standards for the high priest.

Now, the reason why I bring that up is because on the Hebrew Israelites' chart, they got the Levites being the priests. The Haitians, they say the Haitians are the Levites.

Yeah, so out of the Haitians, you might think would come the high priest. But the way Sakari gets around it is they call their leader chief priest.

So he's not a high priest; he's a chief priest.

And if you look, when you open up the Bible, you say, "Wait a minute, what would the difference be between the chief priest and the high priest?" Here, it doesn't appear to be a meaningful distinction.

But I think they might do that partially to, first of all, give lip service sometimes to Jesus. Well, he's our high priest. Sometimes you'll catch one of them saying that, although they're going to say Yahawashi.

But also maybe it's to avoid these restrictions that if you're going to really law-keep high priest, look what needs to go down.

I'm just bringing that out.

Now, obviously, I'm not saying he should have covered all this. This is just like a behind-the-scenes video for you guys. You're watching, you're getting little extra stuff there.

But all that's kind of in the surface. And so he brings up the fact that in the Old Testament, blood is required for certain sacrifices. We all know there's different sacrifices for different things.

But Day of Atonement, certainly you're going to have blood, and it is true that the life is in the blood. That's a biblical concept. He brings up Leviticus 17:11 and then goes to a great New Testament passage relevant to that, Hebrews 9:12.

The Hebrew Israelite just starts off saying he can keep the law. And what do I do when I don't do it? I just won't do it again.

Notice he doesn't mention forgiveness. He doesn't mention a confession. I'm not talking about a Roman Catholic thing. I'm talking about what 1 John says. We confess our sins to another.

He doesn't mention anything that is proper for a disciple of Christ to do when they sin, right? He just says, "I just don't do it again."

Yeah, but you will do it again. So what do you—this is how shortsighted their view of sanctification is. They don't really have a view of sanctification, is my point, which is increasing holiness as we're patterned after Christ by the power of the Holy Spirit in our life.

That is all absent from their understanding, and that's why they're just pushing law-keeping. But they bring up fringes and beards, but they really don't keep the law.

In fact, I bet this confrontation happened on a Saturday. And you have to ask yourself, does it look like these guys are at rest, right? Does this look like a Sabbath rest to you?

Now, if particular one didn't happen on Saturday, the point is a lot of these do because Saturday is the day they think they can work.

Now, it's true the priest could work inside the temple, but they couldn't go outside the temple and work. So their excuses don't make sense about why they're allowed to work on their Sabbath.

So there's just problem after problem after problem, not just in the delusion that they can keep the law, the fact that they're not even properly keeping it anyway.

So all that's happening, and the guy thinks he has an N because KP brings up Hebrews 9. He says, "Oh yeah, Hebrews 10." What? Just skips right over Hebrews 9?

It's almost like you hear a key word, "Oh, I can go to Hebrews now. I'll go to Hebrews 10."

Yeah, did they ever get to Hebrews 9? He kept on telling them, "I'm going to let you get to it." I never heard him get to it.

And yeah, it's Sakari's fault for that.

Yeah, yeah, never let him get to it. Did the common Hebrew Shuffle, the Hebrew Hopscotch jump?

I pray Hebrew Hopscotch.

Yeah, yeah, but yeah, jumped to the—did the Hebrew Hopscotch to Hebrews 10:26, did not go back and go over Hebrews 9 and then jump somewhere else, hopscotch to somewhere else.

So that's—and that's the tactic. They can never sit anywhere and exegesis a real text. They can't do it.

So yeah, did you want to see the rest of this play out, or did you have something else to say?

Put it on play because then let's do some commentary on Hebrews 9 and on Hebrews 10. We'll do some commentary after we play some more.

All right, all right. This is the book of Hebrews 10, verse 26.

For if we sin willfully after we receive—

Hold on, hold on. It said what? Sin willfully? Did it say fall short?

Let's talk about what sinning willfully is.

I'm asking, did he say fall short?

No, it says sin willfully.

Okay, that means you purposely did it, right?

Yeah, but what's—let's define sin willfully.

But let's finish the verse. Finish the verse.

After which we receive the knowledge of the truth—

Let's finish. We can talk back and forth.

Yeah, right. So what I'm saying is I am defining sinning willfully. That means you're doing it on purpose. Sin means transgression of the law. Willfully meaning on purpose.

We don't have transgression under the law.

To who?

To people who are under the law, right?

No, no, no. 1 John 3:4.

This is the book of 1 John 3 and verse—stay on 26.

Hold on, you just asked what I want to finish this. We're going to go back to that, but sin is transgression of the law.

Changing the topic, brother.

I'm not—I'm saying 26.

No, you said sin according to what you quoted another verse, so you just changed the topic.

I want to go to another verse. Whosoever committed sin transgresses also the law, for sin is the transgression of the law.

Am I transgression?

Amen.

So who's under the law?

We go—the Israelites.

So he didn't let me go over Hebrews.

I guess that's a good place to pause since you got to the add there.

Okay, so now do any of these elements of conversations, I'll be curious, God Logic, for you, are any of these elements of the conversation so far reminiscent of your conversations with Muslims?

Absolutely.

Yep.

How?

Tell us how.

They are changing and hopping and not dealing with directly with what we're talking about.

And when we're—let's say I bring a verse in the Quran, they do not want to deal with the verse and talk about everything else other than what I've asked specifically and what we're talking about.

So that's what I see similarly with the Hebrew Israelites.

He brings up a particular subject, a particular verse, and they literally do not deal with it. They don't deal with that.

Hell, done. They come up with something else and misrepresent what he's saying.

So that's what I see.

What do you call it?

Do you just call it—

I call it the Muslim Shuffle.

Okay, okay.

Yeah, so that is exactly what's going on. And you know, that's a telltale sign. Everyone should realize that's a telltale sign of a religion that's not based upon the actual Bible.

It's based upon bad readings of certain biblical texts, but it's not based upon the whole of the Bible.

And it's not even actually based upon the scriptures it's claiming to be on most of the time because what it's doing is getting those wrong.

And you know, let's talk a little about—they talked about 1 John 3:4. That's where every Hebrew Israelite goes for the definition of sin.

And it's almost like when they ask you what is sin, unless you answer 1 John 3:4, they act like you have the wrong answer as if there's no other ways to describe it.

Now, when you read through the Torah, the main way that the Torah describes sin is as a weight or as a burden.

Interestingly enough, now the point by saying that is the Bible uses different ways to describe sin itself.

They just are stuck on one because of their delusion that they're lawkeepers.

Let me give you an example. Leviticus 10:17 describes that when the priest consumed the sin offering, it's equated with carrying the iniquity, carrying the iniquity.

There's the idea of like a burden or something. And you also see texts that describe sin as a debt, like Leviticus 5:1.

If a person sins after he hears a public oath to testify when he is a witness, whether he gets seen or otherwise known, if he does not tell it, he will bear his guilt.

Same thing with Leviticus 24:15, bear his sin. The idea is you owe the debt.

You also see it being described in terms that relate to that in terms of enslavement.

And so you see different ways. You see these different legal metaphors. You see Hosea portraying sin as an offense against God.

The guilt of Ephraim is bound up; his sin is kept in store, Hosea 13:12, because what it does is it's storing up wrath.

It's a source of uncleanness. You know, Psalm 51:7, "Purify me with hyssop that I'll be clean; wash me so I can be whiter than snow."

Sin is described as impurity or sickness. Deuteronomy 33, 30:3 is described in that way where it says the Lord will heal you of your sins.

And so you have all these different ways it's described. We're not denying what 1 John 3:4 is saying.

We're just saying that's one answer. That's part of the larger concept of what sin is.

And the reason why Christians often say "miss the mark" has to do with the idea of hamartia. Hamartia, that's a Greek word for sin, and it has to do with missing the mark.

So it's not a strange thing to say, and it's weird that he would hear it and talk about the mark of the beast.

No, so here's another thing to that, Vocab, because we're talking about—and I'm glad you was touching on this—at how the Bible describes sin in many different ways and how they're stuck on one.

Even Romans 14 gives a different definition of sin, right? Or a different way to consider sin.

It says in Romans 14, verse 23, it says, "But whoever has doubts is condemned if he eats because the eating is not from faith, for whatever does not proceed from faith is sin."

So this is another way to describe sin, not simply just transgression of the law.

And then that's what they're focused on. Whatever doesn't proceed from faith is sin as well.

That's what the Bible describes sin also.

How do they do here then? You know, they usually don't let the Christian get to that.

And later on, if you notice in the dialogue, he accuses KP of running from 1 John 3:4.

KP wasn't running from 1 John 3:4. First of all, what happened is the Sakari guy ran to 1 John 3:4 because that's what he was taught.

They take these quizzes, and they have these little tests you gotta pass. That's what he was taught is use 1 John 3:4.

They've been doing this since the 60s at least that we know of, only utilizing 1 John 3:4 and basically giving you the buzzer unless that's exactly what you answer.

You know, 1 John 3:4, the idea there with 1 John 3:4, the word you use is anomia, lawlessness.

Lawlessness, and you can—you should be understanding this in a New Covenant context, but they're only really looking at it, even though it's 1 John, they're only looking at it in an Old Covenant context.

And even at that, sort of a limited understanding.

And so that's what they'll do. And notice it's like sin is a problem because of how holy God is.

Sin is a problem because of who God is. Sin is a problem because of the Fall.

These guys teach that Gentiles can't even really sin because they weren't given the law in the first place.

So they can't have a savior because they don't need salvation because they weren't given the law in the first place.

This is the kind of stuff they teach about the larger idea.

I mean, I feel like I see similar things in Islam where they do not properly understand the holiness of God.

They do not properly understand the problem with sin. It's mainly viewed in legal terms, but that's not all that it is.

Now, the point KP is making, which is perfect, is that the way you deal with sin is not by just saying, "I'm not going to do it again."

KP was getting to this if the guy would have just listened. He actually would have got some good stuff KP was saying.

It requires a sacrifice. It requires blood. And that's why he said, "Do you have the blood?"

And the guy says, "What do you mean, do I have the blood?"

And it's like, I don't know how someone could read the New Testament and not know what someone means as a fellow Bible reader when they say something like, "Do you have blood?"

You should know right away. And Paul uses blood really as basically just shorthand. When he talks about blood of Christ, he's talking—he's basically using it as shorthand to refer to the cross.

So here, Hebrews 9:12, here's what KP referenced, but they never got to.

And the Sakari guy gave him an IOU. Oh, we'll get back to it.

I just want everyone to know, and that's one thing that you did so good in your discussion with Hakah.

I know he likes to go by Deacon Sakari, but his Lashan Kadash name is Hakah.

Hakah wanted to do that, and I think because of your experience dealing with Muslims, you wouldn't let him go to all these places.

And so you guys actually dealt with text a lot better. I thought it was really good.

Thanks, thanks. We still need to do a review of that. I've got all the clips lined up.

Hebrews 9:12 says he entered once for all into the holy places, not by means of the blood of goats and calves, but by means of his own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption.

Such a powerful verse. That's a beautiful verse.

And so because he entered once for all, ladies and gentlemen, the sacrifice does not need to be repeated.

And that's why, for example, Passover is not required. Day of Atonement is not required for the New Testament believer.

Christ continues, though, in the most holy place. He didn't enter and then leave. He's at the throne of God now.

But prior, you had the blood of goats, calves, oxen, bulls, and the septu. You see that.

But Jesus's sacrificial death is by means of his own blood and is the basis of eternal redemption.

This is a paid release from sin, eternal redemption.

So just look at this verse, and it's just steeped in Old Testament truth because it's relating this to the activity of priests, especially the high priests on the Day of Atonement.

But it's relating all that and putting it to Jesus, and it all relates it to make the whole point that the book of Hebrews begins with that Jesus is better.

He's superior to the angels. He's better than any high priest. He's better than all that.

Why? He's the mediator of a better, superior covenant.

That's another thing, God Logic, to understand. These guys don't think we're in the New Covenant.

They think essentially we're in a renewed Old Covenant, and they'll use different verses that don't mean the way they're trying to mean it to try to get the Christian to see, "No, we're just still stuck in the Old Covenant," despite the fact that Jesus in Luke says this, "The blood of the New Covenant poured out."

And the fact that Hebrews talks about it as if it's here now, it's a reality now. It's not consummated.

And Jesus even says that, "I'm not going to eat this again until in the kingdom."

That's the consummation of the New Covenant he's talking about there when he institutes something better than the Passover, which is the Lord's table or the Lord's supper or communion, by the way, which most Hebrew Israelite groups also don't do.

It's so interesting. They act like they're doing all this stuff, but then when Jesus tells them to do something, because later on in the conversation, the guy says, "I do the red letter."

Well, where's your communion? Do this in remembrance of me.

Has Sakari started taking communion secretly, and I don't know about it? Let me know if you do that. It'd be great, guys.

Maybe they'll start to teach you about what this thing is really all about, but as of now, we know you don't.

So when Jesus says something, then you don't do what he says.

Jesus says, "Go baptize them in the name of the Father, Son, and the Spirit." That's a command. Teach them commandments, Matthew 28:18-20.

Guess what? Sakari don't baptize people in water. They definitely don't baptize them in the name of the Father, Son, and Spirit.

So what do you mean if it's red letter, you do it?

And let me just mention one other trick, and then we're going to continue on with Hebrews 10:26 because I want to let people see the video.

But hopefully, they can see the video because this is commentary on the video.

Check this out. When Sakari gets pinned down on Hebrews in debates, here's what they do.

Who wrote Hebrews?

Well, we don't know for sure. It could be this person. It's anonymous.

So I'm not going to take an anonymous book and use that to go against the words of Jesus because it's anonymous.

Sakari does that trick again and again and again.

They always talk about how since Hebrews is anonymous, we can't use it authoritatively.

However, they don't do that with Christians who don't know that they teach that or mess around with that.

Now, this thing with Galatians does come up in the conversation. We'll get to that.

But you should just know it's a trick of Sakari to constantly be like, "Oh, you don't know who wrote Hebrews? We can't really use it authoritatively because it's anonymous."

Now, he didn't do that here, but that's something that they frequently do when they need to.

They feel they'll do it. They'll pull it out, which is funny because how many Old Testament books are technically anonymous?

A lot. A lot of Old Testament books are technically anonymous.

Now, there's Jewish tradition about who wrote some of them. Some of them are clear. Obviously, Jesus affirmed that Moses is the author behind the Torah, but some of them are not obvious.

The Book of Judges, for example, and there's editorial work on the Bible to this day. It's named this. That's editorial work. Who's that editor? He's anonymous.

So I'm just saying, I know that's going off too, but everyone should understand some with some of these groups, there's a lot of dishonesty beneath the surface and inconsistency.

And you'll see it bubble up the more you deal with certain groups. Other groups have more integrity; some have less.

But let's see what's going on in this dialogue.

All right, let's see. Make sure you guys are hitting the like button on the stream, and make sure you guys are subscribing to Vocab Malone on his channel.

If you guys are not familiar with the brother, I'm telling you, he does this often. He goes live often. He's dealing with Hebrew Israelites all the time, breaking down these arguments.

So where you guys can get into—when you guys get into it, man, Vocab's channel is a beautiful channel to have in your back pocket.

Always in your ear when you're getting ready to deal with these guys, man. They are afraid of him, literally.

They tell a lot of their people not to tell them Vocab.

Like, aren't you blacklisted when it comes to a lot of Black Hebrew Israelites?

Where you go?

Sakari pulls out umbrellas whenever I come. The second they see me before I say a word, they put them out like that.

And then they follow me around with open umbrellas, and it's usually like two or three guys.

So there's like a faank or whatever that Greek word is of umbrellas, and they'll poke me with the tips like Penguin and Batman.

It's the weirdest thing, man. It's a weird thing.

So yeah, their official thing is to pull out an umbrella if you got—and then they have speakers.

They have a guy who stands behind the speaker, and whatever direction I go, because I walk when I'm talking to them, they turn the speaker on me.

I've in Houston, the guy was doing it the whole time. He was tracking me, so the speaker was always amplifying directly on me.

Really bizarre stuff, man.

That's funny, dude.

So yeah, check it out, man. He has a lot of his footage on his channel, man. So make sure you guys subscribe to Vocab, man. He's a true blessing, man.

All right, let's see what else we got here, man.

Now, by the way, guys, KP, he does commentary on his own video right here. Like, if you see little clips, he right here, you know, as I'm skimming through, you can see that he actually, you know, is clarifying some things actually that they didn't allow him to get to, right?

So he actually breaks down Hebrews 10:26 in his video as well. So I encourage you guys, like I said, go watch the original video. Go on KP's channel, watch the video, go comment on it, like it, support it, and watch how he breaks this stuff down as well when he's breaking it down and commentating on his own video.

All right, here we go.

Sin is the transgression of the law, whether you're under it or not.

You breaking the law is sin willfully, whether you're under it or not.

You breaking the law is sin willfully, meaning on purpose, right?

And tell me, and tell me, tell me Galatians 3:2.

Y'all see how he just did that, right?

I want to identify this whole verse. I want to identify this whole verse.

Give me three minutes, bro. Let me break this down for you.

I promise I'll let you break it down, but let—

C, promise. I promise I'm going to let you get it.

Huh?

I'm going to let you get it, but let—man, let my boy cook, man. What they doing, bro?

Let's let him cook, man.

Hey, man, you know those old cowboy movies, and you got the settlers, and they meet with a chief. They shake their hand for some land deal or something.

You know, I promise from a Sakari member is about as worthless as a white man's handshake in an old cowboy movie.

And of course, in real life on the Western Front, what Vocab is saying is a Hebrew Israelite, specifically a Sakari, a Sakari promise is as useful as a Muslim saying, "Inshallah, we'll debate."

Inshallah, I'll be there.

Whenever a Muslim says "Inshallah," you know good and well it ain't going to happen.

It's not happening.

When a Sakari member says, "I promise," boom, you know it ain't going to happen, man.

Hey, you got the 50 bucks?

No, I didn't. Did you get that?

No, I didn't get my money, man.

But didn't he say he was a man of his word?

He said he was a man of his word, Vocab. Where's my 50 bucks, man?

Do people know about that?

Hakah said if you—I forgot what he wanted you to do right now, read a certain verse or something, he's going to cash after you 50, right?

Then cash app another 50.

Where is it at, man? Where is it at, man?

But here we go. Let's get back into this video.

There's actually a—I'm going to actually skip past this part.

There's a point that I actually wanted to touch on here unless there was something in between here that you wanted, but I want to get to where they start talking about Paul because he brings up—

Yeah, what was the verse in Galatians that KP wanted to go to?

Remember Galatians 3?

Galatians 3:12.

We got to finish this verse, and then I'm going to let you break it down.

Let me break this down for you.

I promise I'll let you break it down, but we got to finish—

Three minutes, bro. This whole verse, I want to identify this whole verse.

Give me three minutes, bro. Let me break this down.

Y'all see how he did?

And tell me, and tell me, tell me Galatians 3:12.

Galatians 3:12.

Galatians 3:12 because I don't think they ever get to that either, do they?

No, never. They never brought it up.

He had to bring it up in his video, in this video.

Yeah, when he's doing his commentary, that's when he brings it up because they didn't let him do it there.

Real quick, Galatians 3:12, but the law is not of faith. Rather, the one who does them shall live by them.

That's Galatians 3:12 that he's bringing up.

So Paul there was actually quoting Leviticus 18:5, and it seems like Paul has a similar sentiment as this in Galatians 3:12 as he does in Romans 10:5.

And the reason why that's interesting is because if he does, and I think he does mean the same thing as he does in Romans 10:5, the guy says that Paul was off in Galatians but on in Romans.

But here the sentence actually would be the same, and this is the verse KP was going to that made him discount the book of Galatians.

And so when you look at that, the idea in Leviticus 18:5 is that righteousness—that is a quote there—that righteousness that is based on the law.

And Paul, I think, references that in Philippians 3:9 in contrast to righteousness based on faith, and that's Romans 10:6.

And so there's an interesting question about what is going on there.

Now I'm going to read something from my—I got my ESV Study Bible, and I got a little study note I'm going to read here.

And by the way, I encourage people to get the ESV Study Bible.

Here's what it says. I think it's helpful.

The one who does them shall live by them in its original context had to do with the temporal blessing and fullness of life that would come to the one who does the law.

But it also seems to be a conditional promise within the law indicating that obedience would lead to righteousness.

This promise, however, remains unfulfilled because it relies on the fulfilling of a condition that could never happen.

It relies on a human doing the law in a complete and sufficient way.

And so this is proved because we need Jesus. We need a substitute. We need sacrifice. We need a perfect savior.

This proves it there, what he means there in Galatians 2:25 when he quotes Leviticus 18.

A little bit more here. There's some other ways to look at this, perhaps, but the point is that Paul is talking about the way we're saved.

The way that means anyone is saved is not through law-keeping, not through law-keeping.

And he describes that kind of law-keeping as not being of faith there.

And that's a very interesting thing.

And you could see why Hebrew Israelites of the Sakari variety would want to say, "Well, we don't listen to Galatians. It was his earlier work and therefore wrong before he got Acts 21 corrected."

Don't—my bad, my bad. Go ahead.

That's exactly—but I'm glad that you stopped us here because this gives us the window why they said what they're about to say in the clip I'm about to show.

But so in Galatians, KP was about to cut them with this verse here, but the law is not of faith.

Rather, the one who does them shall live by them.

And so they're like, "Ah, well, you know, Paul—"

Y'all will see. Y'all will see.

Paul didn't know what he was talking about in Galatians.

Boom!

Paul—what? Paul didn't know what he was talking about in Galatians?

Specifically, Vocab, but guess who does? The man with the blue shirt in Atlanta.

He knows.

But Paul? Who is he?

Paul? Clueless, man.

It's not like—it's not like, you know, Jesus literally called him from heaven in the book of Acts.

He didn't get a revelation from Jesus, knocked off his high horse, and then sent to the Gentiles to be a witness of the Lord's name.

Vocab, not him.

It's not like Paul, you know, was used by God to spread the gospel all over the known world.

It's not like that happened.

It's not like the Lord performed miracles through Paul.

He didn't do no miracles, Vocab.

He ain't do nothing, none of that.

Not like it's not like Paul was used by the Lord to compose 13 of the 27 New Testament books.

Yeah, but half of those books, Vocab, he didn't know what he was talking about.

Yeah, yeah, it's a mixed bag. It's a mixed bag, I suppose.

Notice, though, this is wild. This is important to understand.

If there's 27 books in the New Testament library, and if Paul's behind 13 of them, it's like this is like right around half.

You're G to throw questions on now because it's not just Galatians.

There's other places where they throw shade on Paul.

Galatians is especially odious to them, but they throw shade on other places too.

Now, if you include Hebrews as written by Paul, which I just counted as anonymous, then you got 14 of 27, so it'd be even worse then.

But I mean, imagine the boldness and audacity to say Paul didn't know what he was talking about in Galatians.

Well, guess what? Who thought Paul did know what he was talking about in Galatians?

Peter, because he was corrected by Paul to his face for being out of step with the gospel and had to do a table fellowship with Gentiles.

Now watch what he going to say later. He's going to mix it up and put it at the reverse that Peter was the one that was correcting Paul like an idiot.

Now, Vocab, you asked me earlier, what do I see? Is there anything in this that reminds me of my dialogues with Muslims?

Can you ask me that question again, please, Avery?

When you watch this, is there anything that reminds you of your dialogues with Muslims?

Absolutely, Vocab.

You know what? What is—I mean, like they are just mirrors of each other.

Is that they both hate Paul.

They're both intimidated by Paul.

Both groups, the Muslim groups and the Sakari group, are intimidated, and they get cut up by Paul so much that they got to reject him.

They gotta fault him. They gotta point the finger at him.

They're scared of him, man.

They are just alike.

I remember I debated Nadir Ahmed, and he was like, "Wait, Paul? Why would you quote Paul? He was kicking down doors and raping women in the middle of the night."

And you know, like these exaggerated crimes of pre-Christian Paul.

I don't remember him saying raping in the night. I'm exaggerating a little bit, but I mean this idea you'll see is like, "Oh, he's a crazy guy. He's a psychopath. Why would you listen to Paul?"

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

It's tough.

All right, here we go.

If Paul was raping women in the middle of the night, maybe Muslims would like him better.

They might be like, "You know what? We mess with Paul, man."

You know, alhamdulillah.

Alhamdulillah, Paul didn't know he was talking about.

I'm explaining why.

Did you know what happened in Acts 21?

Tell us, brother.

Tell us what happened in Acts 21.

He about to tell us, y'all.

Make sure y'all get it because he's about to tell us accurately as a rightly divider of the word.

He about to tell us exactly correctly what happened in Acts 21.

Tell us, Sakari.

Come on now.

Acts 21 lets us know that Paul was corrected by the way he was trying to neglect certain parts of the law.

For an example, circumcision.

Right? When we read Romans, Romans was after Galatians.

Right? My bad. I keep moving.

Romans is after Galatians.

So when we read after the rebuke of Paul, Paul literally says Romans and then Galatians.

No, no, no. We're saying in the timeline, in the biblical timeline, Galatians was written first.

Then Romans was written.

Right? Galatians was written first, guys.

Galatians was written first.

Then, you know—

All right, okay.

So we see certain contradictions in Galatians and Romans.

Well, why are there contradictions?

We know that the Bible don't contradict itself.

There must have been an error.

The error was in Acts 21, Paul being rebuked by Peter and the elders.

Oh, Paul—

But first of all, see, it's not Vocab, and hear me out.

It's not that, you know, the error is possibly my brother's own understanding and misinterpretation of the text.

The error is Paul himself contradicting himself from Galatians to Romans.

Not that he misunderstands what Paul says as what Peter says, that people misunderstand his writing.

This is what we're seeing an example of.

Not only that, when he's about to tell us, "Do you know what happened in Acts 21?"

You know what happened?

He about to tell us, Vocab, that Peter and the elders corrected Paul.

Was Peter there in Acts 21, Vocab?

Do you tell me, man?

I don't know.

Let's—well, let's read some Acts 21.

Let's read.

And real quick, everyone, you know, that was a great way to put it, which is more likely that Paul, you know, this well-trained rabbi scholar, you know, who's called directly by Jesus, who understands Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, and probably Latin as well, that he's contradicting El between Romans and Galatians, which have all these thematic theological overlap and similarities because they address a lot of similar themes.

Or that—which is more likely?

Or the Hebrew Israelites are getting it wrong, you know what I'm saying?

And it's exactly what Peter says happens with Paul's letters.

So here, let's start Acts chapter 21, verse 17, if we could.

All right, let me put it on the screen too for when we—when we had come to Jerusalem, the brothers received this gladly.

On the following day, Paul went in with us to James.

I just got to stop right there. The brothers received him gladly from jump.

They're like, "This is right-hand of fellowship talk."

This isn't, "I'm about to sit you down in the principal's office" talk.

Yeah, you know.

Wow.

On the following day, so they waited, Paul went in with us to James, and all the elders were present.

So James and the elders of Jerusalem, right?

After greeting them, he related one by one the things that God had done among the Gentiles through his ministry.

Now, of course, they're going to say, "Oh, that doesn't actually mean Gentiles."

Yeah, those are the Jews.

Yeah, even though, you know, just it just says Gentiles, but somehow we're supposed to know it actually doesn't mean Gentiles among the Gentiles through his ministry.

And when they heard it, they glorified God.

Now wait a second. They supposed to be rebuking Paul right now, Vocab?

Yeah, think just think about it.

Paul's relating this report, and it's filled with errors and mistakes and telling people not to get circumcised, supposedly, which is not true, by the way.

All this is happening, and they're like, "Praise God! Praise God!"

This doesn't make their interpretation doesn't make sense of Acts 21.

That doesn't make any sense of what actually happens in the text.

So just follow along with the narrative, kind of walk through at a pace, and you'll see this dude doesn't understand Acts 21.

When they heard it, they glorified God, and they said to him, "You see, brother, how many thousands there are among the Jews of those who have believed? They are all zealous for the law."

And they have been told about you.

So these aren't people that have met them here. They've been told about Paul.

So what's the rumor that some of these converts out of Judaism to Christianity have been hearing?

So it's a rumor, and it's false rumor, but here's what it is.

They've been told about you that you teach all the Jews who were among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, telling them not to circumcise their children or walk according to our customs.

Interesting, even that is—they say according to our customs.

They don't even say according to the law there.

But everyone should understand that this is incorrect.

God Logic, can you real quick go to 1 Corinthians chapter 7?

Because we need to prove that this is not an accurate understanding that the Hebrew Israelite displayed when he says that Paul was telling people to do this.

So they corrected him.

Here's what you guys need to understand.

They're relaying a rumor that they had heard, but they know it's not true, the brothers who are in charge there.

And I'm going to show you from the text we can see it's not true.

1 Corinthians 7:18.

Look at 1 Corinthians chapter 7, verse 18.

Or I don't know if you're able to read that. Want me to read?

I can read.

Can you guys hear me?

Yeah, yeah.

Was anyone at the time of his call already circumcised? Let him not seek to remove the marks of circumcision.

Was anyone at the time of his call uncircumcised? Let him not seek circumcision.

For neither circumcision counts for anything nor uncircumcision, but keeping the commandments of God.

Each one should remain in the condition in which he was called.

That's beautiful, Paul.

It is, and exactly right.

And guys, look at this.

If they're going to throw Galatians under the bus, they're going to have to throw 1 Corinthians 7 under the bus here too.

That's tough.

Yeah, so no, he's not telling Hebrews to not circumcise their male children.

He's not saying that.

He's saying, "Look, you're Jewish. You've been circumcised. Don't."

Because some Jews, when they got heniz, they would try to—there's a surgery you could do to basically try to cover up your circumcision.

I've read a little bit about it.

They would do it in the ancient world.

There's a fancy name for it. I forget what it is on top of my head.

But Paul's saying you don't need to do that, and he's saying to the most likely Gentiles for the most part it would be Gentiles.

Now, there could be other cases such as Timothy, which we can talk about here.

But you have a situation where he's like, "Look, you don't need to go that way. You don't need to go this way because that's not what it's about."

And this is interesting.

He says it's not about circumcision. It's not about uncircumcision, but keeping the commandments of God.

Wait, what?

Keeping the commandments of God?

To be more specific, what that shows everybody is that a biblical definition of keeping the commandments of God under a New Covenant doesn't have anything to do with circumcision, man.

Yeah, this shows we're in a different covenant, people.

You could not say this under the Old Covenant.

Paul would have been incorrect to say this under the Old Covenant, but we're not under the Old Covenant.

And that's, by the way, the farther point of some of the section of Corinthians exactly talks about that, especially when you move on to the next chapter.

So this is very important to understand.

Paul even says this is my rule in all the churches.

He's talking about now in context of marriage, but he relates that principle to other spheres of life.

So you guys see that this is important to understand.

So this rumor about Paul wouldn't be true according to his own writings.

Not only that, can we show one more real quick from the book of Acts itself?

Can you go to Acts 16, and then we'll jump back to Acts 21?

Let's just take a look here.

Acts chapter 16 specifically.

Yeah, verse 3.

And so Paul's not teaching against circumcision.

So what's that tell you, everybody?

Because guess what?

If we're going to do the chronology thing, Acts 16 is before Acts 21.

So they would have known for sure the rumor about Paul telling people, "Don't circumcise," "Don't," or "Your kids," it would have been false because look—can you read Acts 16:3?

Yep, it says, "Paul wanted Timothy to accompany him, and he took him and circumcised him because of the Jews who were in those places, for they all knew that his father was a Greek."

Now, they take that not as he's actually a Greek, even though you gotta be kidding me.

Yeah, they take it as he was a Hebrew who spoke Greek or something like that.

But the whole point of this passage is his mother's Jewish and his father's Greek.

That's the whole point of this passage.

So what's going on here with Timothy and Paul?

Here's what's going on here with it.

Okay, first of all, we recognize Paul never abandoned his heritage.

He wasn't a sellout.

He just understood he was in the New Covenant.

So he circumcised Timothy.

This would be necessary if Timothy's going to join his mission, which he does.

Why? Paul regularly went into synagogues.

He can't have someone who was known to be an uncircumcised Jew with him in these synagogues.

That would have created a problem.

He wasn't trying to deal with it.

It would have made the witness of the Jews that much more difficult.

So Paul wasn't there to fight with Jews about non-essentials.

And how do you know that?

Read 1 Corinthians 9:19-21.

He literally talks about to someone under the law, it's like I'm under the law.

If you're not under the law, it's like I'm not under the law.

He's talking about, "I'm not fighting about these non-essentials."

He's not saying he's lying or being deceptive.

He's saying the mission is the gospel.

That's the important thing, and that's what KP was trying to get Sakari to see, but they weren't.

So this is a beautiful passage that shows Paul's not abandoning that.

He's about the mission, so he actually has Timothy circumcised.

But here's what's crazy.

He doesn't do that to Titus, and this gets into a whole thing.

I don't want to go too far afield because we need to return to Acts 21, but Titus, all the evidence indicates Titus was not a Jew, which is important because Titus is the one who is left in charge of the churches in the areas of Crete.

That's important because it shows it's not about some ethnic hierarchy because he's assigning Titus leadership roles.

And that goes not just for Sakari but other groups like Israel of God and the more moderate types.

They don't like Titus being a Gentile, but he doesn't have him circumcised because he's not trying to put it onto a Gentile.

But with a Jew, it's a different set of expectations.

So he's like, "Hey, bro, you're going to do this. We need to do this. We don't want to be arguing about what's in your pants the whole time, so let's do this."

And point.

So that is such a great point.

Let's hold—

We're going to get back.

I'm following your lead, Vocab, but man, that was a great point.

We have an example of Paul's, you know, his intention and what—like he understands his situation and doesn't want anything to get in the way of him spreading the gospel.

When he has Timothy with him, he has Timothy get circumcised because he is a Jew, and that's what they do.

But for Titus, he does not have Titus get circumcised, showing there's a difference, man.

Yeah, Titus is not a Jew, so the law and circumcision is not incumbent on him.

Yeah, exactly.

And by the way, if someone wants to know where's that at, it's Galatians 2, I think, is where that's referred to.

And you want to go there real quick?

Well, just so I think people could just not—it's Galatians 2:1.

Paul refused to allow Titus to be circumcised in Jerusalem.

But he did with Timothy, and you can get his whole understanding on this.

Yeah, it talks about all this.

It's Galatians 2:3 specifically.

Verse 3 specifically.

Even Titus, who was with me, was not forced to be circumcised, though he was a Greek.

If you want to get really good at it, you got to go, "He was forced to be circumcised."

You know, you gotta do the call.

That's your job.

You're supposed to do that.

I know the role.

Yeah, but so you guys see that there's a difference based upon that.

And this is important.

We put all this together, and we see in Acts, one place he's got Timothy, Acts 16, being circumcised.

But when you go to Galatians 2, not so with Titus.

And again, this destroys their whole doctrine, not just about the circumcision rumors that were false in Acts 21 that they're seeming to affirm, basically, like that's what Paul really was doing, but also about the fact that Gentiles are in the squad, specifically Titus, and he's a pastor over churches.

Now, all this comes out of Paul's understanding of 1 Corinthians 9:19.

Now, I hope we can go to Acts 21, but what's he say there?

He says, "I've made myself a servant to all that I might win more of them."

To the Jews, I became as a Jew in order to win Jews.

And that whole passage is about the point.

So this shows you the problems with the interpretation this guy was given.

Now, we understand it's difficult to go through all this out there on the street, so that's why we're doing this now.

And imagine a situation where next time they bring this up to somebody, you say, "Well, why didn't Paul circumcise Titus?"

Yeah, now my guess is, "Well, that was Galatians."

That was the book.

But hold on, the actions are described in another place, and he's never corrected for it.

In fact, he's correcting Peter.

So yeah, all kinds of problems with the honestly lack of understanding.

But this is what they're taught.

This is what they're taught to do.

And notice all this misuse of the text is just to dislodge Paul's authority.

Why do they want to dislodge Paul's authority or attempt to?

Because Paul's authority contradicts what they're taught at One West.

Now, One West is not a current place.

One West is a school that used to exist, and all these camps you see on the street essentially are the ideological children of One West.

So One West ISM contradicts Paul, therefore they try to destroy Paul's authority.

But Judaizers have been trying to do that ever since the beginning of the church, and these are modern-day Judaizers.

Yeah, exactly, exactly, which is weird considering most of them are Jewish.

So back to Acts 21.

Yes, sir.

Acts chapter 21.

So look, look what's said here.

So they receive him gladly. They glorify God, and then they say, "Hey, they're hearing about you, Paul. Here's what they're hearing."

They're hearing that you're telling people not to circumcise their children, walk according to our customs.

Now remember, if that's truth, what happened in Acts 16?

That's all you need to know for now.

Now we go on.

What then is to be done?

So notice they're saying, "Here's a problem. This is what people are told about you."

But it's obvious if you've read the whole book of Galatians, the rumor is false.

And notice they're not affirming the rumor, but they don't want to have non-essentials bogging down the early church.

So they say, "What then is to be done?"

So they're not talking about themselves.

This is important.

They're not saying, "We need to fix this, Paul, because you offended us or something."

They're saying, "These guys, they're going to hear you come too, so what do we do to work it out with them?"

So they're looking for a compromise for a particular situation here.

Do therefore what we tell you.

So clearly they've discussed the solution to this prior, but it's not a correction.

Yeah, go ahead.

So yeah, specifically, Vocab, it looks like James and the elders are not against Paul, but there's a separate group that are that have these rumors about Paul and are not trusting him fully.

It's not James and the elders, right?

NOP,

Strangled and from sexual immorality. Now, what are they quoting or referring to? That's exactly what they came up with in Acts 15. Then Paul took them in, and the next day he purified himself along with them. He went into the temple, giving notice when the days of purification would be fulfilled and the offering presented for each one of them.

This is an important passage to see and to look at, and it just shows that the Sakari does not understand this. They do not understand the passages, and it's not a simple misunderstanding because it has basically a nefarious intention. The intention is to preach a different gospel because KP is saying, "Well, look what Galatians 3:12 says. It's not from the law; it's from faith." Those are held in that context in distinction from each other.

The way for them to get around it is not to really deal with what Paul says; it's to say Paul was in error there. By the way, that affirms their understanding of what Paul is saying, but they're basically saying, "Well, if he was saying that, there, he's wrong." He's wrong, exactly. Yeah, he's wrong. I mean, and he affirms it with, you know, zealous vigor that Sakari got.

Yeah, video, yeah, yeah, such a great breakdown, Vocab, man. Again, guys, keep spamming his link. I'm spamming it. This is VAP Malone, man. As you guys can see, he does a beautiful job breaking down the scripture and dismantling the falsehood of Hebrew Israelites. So, guys, subscribe to VAP Malone, man. Please go over there. I learned so much from his channel. I've been taking notes even before I even started my YouTube channel from him.

So, it's actually an honor to be sharing a live stream with him, man. It's amazing. You know, God really, he really be doing things, man. You know, I appreciate it, and it was good to see you at Speakers Corner, even though we didn't really get to talk. There was a different group of people always surrounding you and stuff. We kind of just might have seen each other out of the peripheral vision or something.

I didn't know that you were at the corner until I saw the video come out where you were up with Jay Smith. Oh, okay, then I guess I saw you out of my peripheral vision. No, I was there. Yeah, I was there. I was on the ladder, of course, as you know. You mentioned I was on the ladder, and I'm going to be putting out a video with different angles of that as well.

You know, Saturday before, I found some Hebrew Israelites, this and that, but at Speakers Corner, my main thing was a prep for the ladder sermon. I had more like kind of small conversations with some people. I talked to Danny Shine, the guy who's advocating drug use. I talked to a couple of other people, some people whose main goal was to be anti-Trinitarian, but they said they were Christians. I talked to the kind of sectarian Christian a little bit, Jonno, some other people here and there.

Interesting time, but I saw you out there smiling. [Laughter] Yes, sir. All right, let's see here. Let's get back into this, man. So, Paul don't know, didn't know what he was talking about in Galatians, man. Let's see. Oh, and Peter and them corrected Paul in Acts 21. Let's see.

And him coming to correct the doctrine that he was teaching in the book of Galatians. I can show you that. You're saying Galatians is a false book? I'm saying what Paul was teaching was a lack of understanding. So, this isn't inspired by God? Hell no. No, what? There's about four different affirmations like that that somebody needs to take, maybe KP himself, and take all the places where he asks him a question about Paul, and he says stuff like, "Hell no," or he needs to be, and put it together and just have a short of Sakari directly denying Paul in the book of Galatians.

That's actually a really good idea. Y'all hear that? Hell no, man, that ain't inspired. Sakari, man, Sakari inspired by God, not the man who actually seen the resurrected Christ. Not the one who actually was used by the Holy Spirit to heal the sick, heal unclean spirits, cast out demons. Not him. He wasn't inspired. Vocab, just don't get it twisted, all right?

Don't forget, caught up to the third heaven, you know? Oh, yeah, murdered, martyred for Christ. No, not that guy. He was martyred, CA, because of Galatians 3. That's why he was martyred. He was martyred because the Romans saw Galatians and killed him for it, man. Hell no. All right, let's see. Go to the scripture where it says, "All scripture is inspired by God." That's 1 Timothy, right? Right.

So, who wrote that? Who wrote that? Paul wrote Timothy, right? And what books was he reading when he said all scripture? The Torah and the Tanakh. So, you can't say Paul's epistles are... So, you just reject the Galatians? I can if I want to, but I believe Paul to be a historical figure, so therefore I believe Paul wrote that, right?

Like, whoever was writing there for Paul, then we're not one-hearted then, bro. Like, if you're rejecting... Brother, brother, we're not rejecting the book; we're rejecting a man. Right, right. All right, this is sad. Yeah, I wanted to touch... I wanted us to touch on this. All scripture is God-breathed, and he's only talking about the Old Testament now, to my...

Yeah, so that's 1 Timothy. That's 1 Timothy, everybody. Wait, did I just say 1 Timothy? I think I... You said 1 Timothy. It's okay. Oh, hold on, wait, because it's 2 Timothy, right? Oops. Yeah, yeah, 2 Timothy 3. Well, because I was in 1 Timothy because I need to show you guys something out of 1 Timothy.

So, there's something in 1 Timothy, and I'll show you in a second that debunks some of what he says. But let's take a look. I think you're going to read 1 Timothy 3. I mean, 2 Timothy 3. Which one? Which one? Verse 16? Yeah, 2 Timothy 3, verse 16. Sorry, guys. All right, all right, good together now. Pray the mighty name of the Lord.

All right, 2 Timothy... Oh, it's not on the screen yet. All right, here we go. Boom. All scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness. Okay, so this is a classic scripture for inerrancy and also the sufficiency of scripture.

Paul, all scripture, grapha, breathed out theas by God. So, what they're trying to say is, "You know, we're not rejecting scripture, KP. We are rejecting a man, Paul." That's what I mean. It's kind of weird. You could do that with anything. It's like, "I don't believe the Book of... I don't believe the Psalms are of God." And then you have a Sadducee who's like, "Well, no, hold on. No, we're not rejecting scripture when we reject Psalms. We're rejecting a man, David. We're rejecting David's work."

By the way, the Sadducees did that. They only accepted the Torah. That's part of the debate they had. That's why they deny the resurrection, yeah, because they said you couldn't find it in other places. It was a non-scriptural doctrine, the Sadducees would say. Now, that's in 2 Timothy. So, before 2 Timothy is written, was 1 Timothy. And that's why I accidentally said 1 Timothy.

Can you go to 1 Timothy chapter 5, 18? Yes, 1 Timothy 5:18. You know it. Hey, yes, sir. Now, here's what's important to understand. This idea that, "Oh, well, Paul can't be talking about his own writings." First of all, that would be doing too much in 2 Timothy 3:16 because that would also mean Paul's not talking about the gospels. He's not talking about... He can't be including the Book of Revelation when it's written. He can't be talking about, you know, what Peter wrote. He can only be talking about the Old Testament, right?

Well, but in 1 Timothy 5, look at this. Can you read this? Let's show him this. Yep, watch this, guys. For the scripture says... This is 1 Timothy chapter 5, verse 18, and it reads, "For the scripture says..." You're supposed to say the what? Oh, yeah, yeah, I was looking at the verse. The scripture says... The scripture says... Bring it out. You shall not muzzle an ox when it treads out the grain.

And oh, there's something else. Yes, sir. Read, "The laborer deserves his wages." Amen. So, the first quotation is from Deuteronomy chapter 25, verse 4. The whole point of this passage, by the way, is saying that elders can receive compensation for their teaching and ruling. That's what he's talking about here.

He uses a principle from agriculture and Old Testament law there from the Torah, Deuteronomy 25. So, he's saying the scripture says this, and the laborer deserves his wages. Well, that's not from the Old Testament, is it? Oh, that's from Luke 10:7. Jesus says that also in Matthew 10:10.

So, this means scripture includes statements of Jesus. Now, some may say, "Oh, yeah, but that's not Paul's writings." Okay, well, we can go to Peter for that. But real quick, the point by showing that is that when all scripture is referred to in 2 Timothy, you can't just say it can therefore only mean that it can only mean the Tanakh is fallacious because even in 1 Timothy, which is before 2 Timothy, you see Jesus's words being referred to as scripture.

Luke 10:7, "Remain in the same house, eating and drinking." It's a parable. What they provide for the labor deserves his wages. Do not go from house to house. I'm sorry, that's not a parable. That's to do with the workers of the Kingdom, my bad. But the point is, anyway, that that's the words of Jesus, the red letters, as they refer to, and he's calling it scripture. You guys see that?

Yeah, so his argument's not right, is the point. It's more encompassing than just the Tanakh. Oh, that's a cut. That's an absolute cut, man, because later on, he goes on to say that the inspired words are the red letters. That's what he goes on to say later in the video.

Let's go ahead and see this, man. This is a cut. So, by the way, guys, just wrap this up. He says that when Paul says all scripture is God-breathed, even Muslims will actually bring this up. When Paul says that all scripture is God-breathed, he's not talking about the New Testament. However, we have... That's in 2 Timothy. In 1 Timothy, in 1 Timothy, before 2 Timothy, we see Paul acknowledges Luke's gospel when he quotes Luke's gospel as scripture.

So, tough, man, tough. And not only that, 2 Peter, of course, he refers to Paul's writings as scripture. Exactly. And in 2 Peter 3, he doesn't give qualifications. He doesn't say the later ones or only certain ones or Paul's writings except for the book of Galatians in 2 Peter 3:16-18. So, that's important for people to understand that Peter refers to Paul's writings as scripture as well.

Specifically, it's verse 16 is what I would use, but 15 is where Paul's name is mentioned. Yeah, so this is important to understand when people try to say, "Well, 2 Timothy must be limited, therefore, to only the Tanakh." Yeah, yeah. And this... Oh, yeah, this is good. Let me put in 15 so that, you know, nobody who watches this later, you know, right, so you can see it's talking about Paul.

Yep, 2 Peter chapter 3, verse 15-18, "And count the patience of our Lord as salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you according to the wisdom given him by who?" Uh, VAB, who did he get this wisdom from? By man? Was it by man? No, it's not by man. It's by the Lord Yahawashi himself gave Paul the wisdom.

So, he's writing divine wisdom. He's writing from inspiration, right? And this is Peter acknowledging this. So, Paul also wrote to you not according to man's wisdom but according to the wisdom given him as he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters.

So, all of Paul's letters are contained the wisdom of the Lord given to Paul. All of his letters are inspiration according to Peter. All of them. Now, let's continue. As he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters, there are some things in them that are hard to understand, as we can clearly see.

Watch this, which the ignorant Sakari, which Sakari, and the unstable twist to their own destruction. I'm sorry, I put that in the verse. It didn't say Sakari. It said the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction as they do the other scriptures. The other scriptures, ladies and gentlemen.

This is the opposite. Sakari is saying because they're saying that Paul twisted stuff, but Peter is saying if you get Paul wrong, you're twisting the scriptures. Go ahead. That's right. So, he says here, "You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, take care that you are not carried away with the error of lawless people and lose your own stability."

Do not be duped by these unstable and ignorant Hebrew Israelites, Muslims, who will try to carry you away with error and cause you to stumble. Cause you to lose your stability, people of God. This is a warning to you. Do not be carried away by these ignorant, unstable people who misquote the verse and misinterpret the scripture, right?

But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be the glory both now and to the day of eternity. Amen. Man, Peter just committed blasphemy, man, because Jesus ain't God according to what he's going to say later on. My goodness. Anyway, that's good stuff.

All right, shall we continue? Yes, sir. All right, let's keep going, man. This is good stuff. All right, I'mma play. Let me make... Tell me if you can hear it because I'm having some issues. Not now. Can't hear it now. You got volume? No, I don't have volume. I can hear you, but I can't... I could hear it earlier, but I can't hear now.

All right, so I gotta... My stuff is tripping. I'm glad KP engaged them because I know he said he doesn't usually debate and stuff, but I'm glad he did because we got a really instructive, helpful video for the Lord's people and hopefully for them. Again, we haven't even hit sort of the culmination of this video. There's a part that's the culmination of it that I think we're going to be getting to soon here.

Yeah, yeah, for sure. All right, let's see here. By the way, the one guy's out of uniform. I was just saying the one guy's got a Revelation 14:19 shirt on with an angel with a sickle, but he just got a Sakari shirt on. Anyway, go ahead. All right, all right. What holiday were they celebrating? I don't know. It was Passover, brother.

Bringing up things like Passover, you know, whatever. I care about the gospel. I want to talk about how do we get to... But you'll see in this conversation, we're jumping everywhere. We cannot stay in a flow. We cannot stay in a consistent dialogue of how do we get to heaven? What are these verses talking about? He wants to talk about Passover. He wants to talk about the history of what Paul did.

This is exactly why Jesus said, "Don't cast your pearls before swine." I honestly should not have even done this conversation. I believe he was sent out as an apostle, but just like Peter rejected Christ three times, Paul is imperfect, just like Peter. Peter was the authority, the rock of the church, and he denied Christ three times.

You don't think Paul... I just want to say something real quick to what KP just said because he said he feels like he shouldn't even have that conversation because he's casting pearls among swine. Guys, I just want to bring attention to this, that a lot of the times, and more often than not, the people that you're talking to, especially us as Christian influencers, Christian evangelists that are out there making content, the person that you're talking to, you know, more likely than not, is not going to change their mind.

They're not going to change. They're on the spot. They're in front of your face. They're filled with pride. They're filled with arrogance. They themselves, a lot of the time in that moment, they're not going to change, right? However, as Vocab touched on, he said, "I'm glad you did this video because now we have such an edifying session to go through."

Because you engaged those Hebrew Israelites, you know, those people you were casting your pearls among the swine. It's because you did that and were obedient to God in your call that now we are able to dissect the arguments, destroy them, and equip the Christians and the other listeners who might be being deceived and duped by these people in their arguments.

So, it's not for them; it's for the masses that it will reach, bro. So, God bless you, KP, if you're still here listening. Your engagement with the Hebrew Israelites caused the edifying of the body of Christ today. And going on, even from your own video, people are going to see how they manipulated things, right?

And people are going to see this stream and see how they manipulated things and how they don't know nothing. So, brother, man, keep doing it. When you see them, approach them. Keep doing it, record it, and keep just being obedient to God, brother. Your work is not in vain. It's sharpening all of us. It's sharpening all of us and giving us a chance to sharpen others, right?

I just wanted to say that really quick. Okay, all right, all right. Let's get back to it, man. You know, all right, all right. Yeah, what I do? Oh, all can make a mistake, of course he can. Okay, so we're showing you his mistake. I'm saying the scripture isn't a mistake, though.

If you want to win any debate, just say you don't believe in the book. It's as simple as that. Just say you don't believe in the book, and you got it. Guys, if you just reject the whole book, you won. This man sounds like he's been debating Muslims all his life. KP, tell me, man, you a Muslim apologist, man? You got a ministry to Muslims because you sound like you've either been watching a lot of God Logic or you yourself got a lot of experience debating Muslims.

Because I think you're talking about Muslims right now. You couldn't be possibly talking about Hebrew Israelites who are about the book, right, Vocab? He can't be talking about them. They go around saying they're the people of the book. They use that phrase in reference to themselves frequently. We're the people of the book.

Oh, no, man, no. Now they're using it as an ethnic designation, but still, they say that. No, man, come on, man. How is the scripture not a mistake if they tell you in the scripture that he made a mistake? Where in the scripture does it say, "I wrote a mistake"?

We can go... Hold on, hold on. You go ahead. Get what you get. You give me Romans 1 and 1, and then we're going to go to Acts 21. But see, they were just talking about Acts 21, and this is where I would actually give the advice to you, KP, in that moment. Because you did, you had the right idea at asking where does he say, "I made a mistake."

But no, no, no, no. Because they're not saying that he says this. They're saying that James and them accuse... They're saying James and them said he made a mistake. So pressure them and press them to show you where in Acts 21 does James and the elders correct Paul? Where do they say Paul made a mistake in the verse, in any of the verse? That's what you need to press them on.

All right, but you have the right idea on that. Let's keep going. You ask Romans 1. We can just read that right there. Give Romans 1 and 1. There's the book of Romans 1 and verse 1. Uhhuh. Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ. It say what? Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ. It say what? Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ. Thus saith the Lord.

We don't see thus saith the Lord until you get in the Tanakh, in the Torah, right? So what do you believe is inspired word of God? Just the Torah? So the gospels... So, sorry, so God does not speak in the New Testament? There is no thus saith the Lord in the New Testament? Forget what we just read, by the way. Forget what we just read about Peter saying that the Lord himself gave Paul wisdom in his writings.

Forget all of that. Thus saith the Lord only happens in the Old Testament, not in Matthew when Jesus is speaking. Not when Jesus is the Lord, the actual Lord is speaking. I forget that. It only happens in the Old Testament, man. Not only that, you know, but Acts 9 conversion, it's pretty wild what is said.

Oh, man, the Lord said to him in Acts 9:15, "This is the Lord speaking to Ananias. He is a chosen instrument of mine to carry my name before the Gentiles and kings and the children of Israel." Think about that. That's like a shocking thing. A chosen instrument to do this. This is a big deal.

Do you guys hear that? The way Paul is described to Ananias. So, you know, they're making light of his apostolic authority, but Paul, when he didn't have a command that was found regarding an issue in the New Testament gospels, Paul would give the command based upon his own apostolic authority. They don't even understand the way this works.

You see instances where Paul says, "I don't have a command from the Lord." So I say this to you, and he says, "I speak as one having in the spirit of the Lord." Now they twist all that and say, "Oh, there, Paul's admitting he's speaking uninspired," which is literally the opposite of what he's saying.

He's saying, "Since Jesus didn't directly speak in this matter, I'm telling you what to do." Like, yo, you have testimony. You know, talk about in the face of two or three witnesses, let a thing be justified, right? You have testimony of testimony to Paul's authority.

Let me just show what we've already seen here. First of all, you have his own... Now, someone may say, "Well, that doesn't count. That's part of the process." Jesus did a similar thing, but then he would say, "Not just me, the Father testifies." But in Paul's case, we have Peter doing the same thing, what we just read, right?

And in Acts 9, we have Jesus himself testifying to this. So this is no small matter. So to go out in the street and just be like, "Yeah, that's worthless. He was wrong. We're right," is really bizarre.

Yeah, how can you not see, everybody, that this is something that is not of God when you're going out on the street with the Bible saying what you're teaching is from the Bible and then directly and explicitly contradicting the Bible and saying, "We don't believe all the Bible"?

And they have no real basis for even rejecting Galatians. They don't really tell you because if they're correcting... Let's just go with the presupposition for a second. God Logic, Paul's corrected in Acts 21. Let's... Okay, okay. How do you know which writings to reject now?

Exactly. Where's the list they put out from this Paul correction council that tells us these are okay or something like that? We need some... I guess we just trust the leadership of Sakari to tell us which ones are off and which ones aren't. Because, by the way, God Logic, not all Hebrew Israelites have this anti-Pauline teaching to this degree.

It's true. A lot of them get suspicious or say, "Well, don't know about this," or they really misinterpret it. Sakari is the most explicit, though, in saying he was wrong, in error, and got corrected. They're the most explicit camp that does this.

So how are we supposed to know then, on the false presupposition, he's corrected in Acts 21? There doesn't even follow logically. Paul's corrected in Acts 21, therefore Galatians is false. What? It's not even a... I don't even see that the link.

But would every book prior to Acts 21 that Paul wrote be false then? Wouldn't that be the logical implication? Therefore, we need a list of all the ones they think were wrote before Acts 21. Why was it only Galatians? Only sections of it? It's just bizarre, man. It's just real bizarre.

Now you can see why Christians who care about truth don't like Hebrew Israelism. It's a false, anti-biblical religion. Yeah, yeah, Antichrist, man. Antichrist. That was a cut, man, bringing up Acts 9. Remember, guys, his accusation was there is no thus says the Lord in the New Testament, and we literally have Acts chapter 9 where we have, "But the Lord said to him."

Yeah, we have thus says the Lord right in Acts chapter 9, one speaking to Paul at his conversion and speaking to Ananias. That confirms the revelation that Paul got at his conversion. All right, let me just read this one more time because this was such a cut, man. Acts chapter 9, verse 15.

"But the Lord said to him, to Ananias, 'Go, for he is a chosen instrument of mine to carry my name before the Gentiles and kings and the children of Israel.'" So wait, the Gentiles aren't the children of Israel here? F out. Yeah, that verse, you're catching something else off topic but relevant.

We use this verse to specifically show them the way the text of scripture in this context we're talking about Luke writing, but he is quoting, of course, something from Jesus, right? And here what you have, you have a designation, a separation, a delineation between Gentiles and the children of Israel.

So these Gentiles, therefore, cannot be children of Israel because they're mentioned as a separate group. Not only that, it's interesting it says kings. You could argue that the Jews had a king at the time, you know, but they only had one. So this is even going out to be a witness to Gentile kings, which, by the way, is fulfilled when you go to Acts 26 and Acts 27, I would say.

And so this shows this a much more broad mission and Hebrew Israelites want to recognize is taking place in the book of Acts. So it is exactly a cut because it's defining these groups differently by showing you they're not all the same group, but they want to smash Gentiles into the children of Israel, but you can't do it.

Exactly, exactly. All right, let's get back to it, man. That's good stuff. Hey, by the way, real quick. Oh, no, go ahead. I thought I saw something else. Go ahead, go ahead.

Okay, Bible brother, watch out, watch out right quick. Watch out right quick. Watch out right quick. So when we read Christ's words, anything red letters, that is literally inspired by God, friends. Soon, come on, man. Get off my freaking page from you today.

Well, you know, I know you much bigger YouTube channel than me, but there's some people who download the videos in advance. But go ahead. I don't... You can only do that on YouTube Red. What? There's all kinds of ways to do it. I... What? No, no, no, no. I'll show you.

Oh, you just talking about downloading the video, period? Yeah, yeah, yeah, in advance, and then you just play from your file. But go ahead. Oh, you know, I'm still new to this, man. I'm still a rookie, you know? Well, how many subs you got, rookie? But go ahead, bro.

I wish I was a rookie with 171,000. Go ahead, rookie, man. Praise God, praise God, hallelujah. That's inspired by God. And when we read Revelation, that's inspired by God because those are all biblical prophecies given by who? Christ and John the Revelator.

So Acts, is that inspired word of God? No, that's a historical book. So then I don't see how we can have a conversation if we don't believe in the same text. What is it? The reason why is because you practice a dogmatic religion and you don't separate.

I'm not in religion. I mean, but you believe in the same religion that taught you you believe that. So prove, give me Revelation 3 and 12, and then we can go back to the... Now, they don't never... They don't get into it, but worth talking about, brother.

Actually, the first... Yeah, it is. You know, the first time I heard this, though, real quick, I didn't realize that he said his Acts inspired by God. He said, "No, it's a historical book." I didn't actually catch that.

Yeah, sounds like he's about to throw out the book of Acts too. Yeah, he threw out the book of Acts. He said that book of Acts is not inspired. It's not inspired scripture. It's a historical book. So what, Acts 9? Nah, nah, but see, what do you do? Because he's like focusing on red letters, but red letters are in Acts 9. Those are red letters in Acts 9 if you're going to make that kind of argument.

What the Lord says to Ananias, those are red letters. So what about that part? Just... And just if Luke is... If Luke is wrong in Acts or if it's not, what about the Book of Luke?

Oh, man, it's worse than I thought. Yeah, bad. You know, Revelation 3, 9 or... I'm sorry, 12. Do you ever have Muslims try to use that against you? Probably before, but mostly it's Jehovah's Witnesses that use that.

Oh, okay, okay. Yeah, Jehovah's Witnesses use Revelation 3:12 where it says that Jesus is the beginning of God's creation, right? They try to use that. Just... I mean, it's silly, actually. The verse proves the deity of Christ, not the other way around.

Well, in Revelation 3:12, I don't know if they got to it or not. I can't remember this part. They did, but what he's trying to get at is because Jesus says, "The temple of my God." They're trying to have Jesus not be God there.

"I will write upon him the name of my God." Yeah, that's what they're trying to do. Yep, same book that describes Jesus in terms of deity in Revelation 1. He's the one who speaks with the voice of many waters. This is all Yahweh language.

And the same Jesus is the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the same one who's worshiped on the throne. You know, that same Jesus, he's not God from the Book of Revelation. Come on now.

Yeah, that's... Yeah, and that's the problem here. You have Revelation, the very first chapter of Revelation that literally has Jesus claiming to be Yahweh, claiming to be the first and the last, who has the keys of Hades and death, power over death, keys of Hades, right?

And he's the everlasting one. He is the true God. And yet here they come, here they ignore Revelation 1, ignore Revelation 28 or 27 where Jesus says again that he is the first and the last, ignore that, skip to chapter 3 where Jesus, glorifying the Father, refers to the Father as his God.

Oh, yep, that takes away his deity. That takes away his deity. We've been through this so many times on this channel when it comes to Jesus acknowledging the Father as his God and why that is. And it's because, just to do it again here, guys, because Jesus, even in Revelation, is still flesh.

He still has two natures, the divine nature and his human nature, just his glorified human nature, but still human nonetheless. And because pertaining to his human nature, the Father is his God because Jeremiah 32:27 says God is the God of all flesh, all of it.

The Word, who is God, became flesh, John 1:14, and dwelt amongst us. That's the point in which Jesus humbled himself, took that role, and now the Father is his God pertaining to his human nature. Simple and plain.

Yeah, exactly. One other interesting thing I saw someone else point out, I thought it was kind of a funny way to go about it in that scripture. Jesus says, "I will make him a pillar in the temple." And I heard somebody say, "Well, Jesus isn't God. He's not going to be making anyone a pillar or anything else."

Yeah, like if you like the context of what he's doing there doesn't make sense. Yeah, exactly upon the Hebrews like misreading. Yeah, exactly. All right, so that was that point. And then, oh, there's one more thing they said that was worth, I think, worth talking about where they talk about, "Was Jesus the only perfect human?"

Oh, yeah, so let's get over here. But everyone should just follow what's happened so far. These guys have denied a grace-based salvation, so we can do it on our own. Yep, these guys have denied the authority of certain parts of the Bible. They don't have any bearing. They're in error because they contradict other parts.

We say it's Paul, but they deny scripture. Yep, and now they're denying Jesus. They're denying Jesus is God. Like, do you see how messed up? That's why when people were like, "Why are you mad at the Israelites? They just found their true identity and they want to keep the law." Don't be upset, bro.

I'm not upset, but I don't like to see TW scripture twisted out in the street with a Bible open, you know? Exactly. It's like when Paul went to Athens and saw all those idols. He's vexed in the spirit. I see some guy in the Bible saying, "And not this part, not this part."

You, yeah, they want this, you know, silly, soft-off Christianity. Man, let's get here in the Bible. I said Luke 1. Let me ask you something. Was Jesus the only perfect person in the Bible? I said Luke 1. By flesh, yes. Give me... I said Luke 1.

Let me ask you something. Was Jesus the only perfect person in the Bible? I said Luke 1. By flesh, yes. Give me this, the Book of Luke 1 and verse 5. There in the days of Herod, the king of Judea, a certain priest named Zacharias of the course of Abijah, and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron.

So just a reminder, this is two people, right? Right, go ahead. And her name was Elizabeth. Uhhuh. So Zacharias and Elizabeth are the two people. Read. And they were both righteous before God. Uhhuh. Walking in all the commandments. Say what? Walking in all the commandments.

They say what? Walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless. Blameless. So how do you become blameless? You're blameless through faith. Romans 4:5. Romans 4:5. Read Romans 4:5. Part of the law, yes or no? No, the law is not... The law is not of faith.

The law is not of faith. Romans 4:5, please. You go to Romans 4:5. We're not stopping. So let me... Let's touch on that, man. So they are going to... By the way, they are going to stop him when he goes there. He just said, "Go to... You go to Romans 1. We're not going to stop you."

And then when he gets there, they actually literally stop him. But go ahead, read it. Let me read it. This has been happening the whole time. But to him that worketh not, but to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, not the godly. The ungodly.

Wait, wait, this is the cut part. This is the part. So first, before we let this play out, let's go ahead and address the blameless thing. Was Jesus the only one perfect? And then we're going to let KP end it off, man. That would be it.

But yeah, so Vocab, let's touch on that, man. Jesus wasn't the only perfect human being. Even, you know, this Job was blameless. These two people in Luke 1, they were blameless, a man and his wife. You know, talk about it.

So I don't know if you could bring up Luke 1 real quick. All right, now let's take a look here at this. So this is a common thing that they'll try to pull. This is something that they try to pull, and it's kind of weird. It's like, you know, you're trying to make... You're trying to denigrate the uniqueness of Jesus.

And the reason why they're trying to do this is they're trying to show you can be described as perfect or righteous because you've kept the law. And KP asked them several times throughout this, "So why did Jesus need to die?" Which is the perfect question to ask.

So look at Luke 15, verse... Yeah, go ahead, verse 5, 6. Okay, in the days of Herod, King of Judea, there was a priest named Zachariah of the division of Abijah. Oh, I'm sorry, Abijah. Yeah, Abijah. And he had a wife from the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elizabeth.

And they were both righteous before God, walking blamelessly in all the commandments and statutes of the Lord. All right, now notice you have a couple here, right? You guys see you got this couple, and this is important. You, Zachariah and Elizabeth, they're described only in Luke, and they're described as childless in verse 7.

They're described as childless in verse 7, and one reason is their age. But Luke is also letting you know a reason why it's not. He's letting you know it's not sin or something like that, like a punishment from God while they're barren because he's bringing out the fact that they are working and seeking to follow Old Testament law and customs, and they're faithful in doing it.

That's all it's saying. They walk blamelessly in all the commandments and statutes of the Lord. These two people could not die for your sin. They still inherit the sin of Adam. Read Romans chapter 5. They are still part of the number of Romans 3, which says there is none who are righteous, no, not one.

So this doesn't mean that they're righteous in that way of being perfect without sin at all. That's not what it's saying, but it's saying that these are faithful Hebrews doing faithful service before the sight of God. So their barrenness is not related to sin or something like that.

Their myopic view of the texts is a problem, and I'm going to show you in a second because I could see a Sakari guy saying, "Oh, well, you're just theologizing on that part." But it's actually quite easy to see. Can you go down a little bit in Luke 1 and just scroll? Go down a little bit further.

Go real slow. I'll show you where. Go down a little bit further, a little bit further. Keep on going, keep on going. What's happening is Zachariah is getting the vision of the angel. Keep on going, keep on going. Put verse 18 at the top.

All right, can you stop right there? Yep. So this is literally in the same chapter. So they're claiming Zachariah's being described as literally perfect, but can you read Luke 1:18, 19, and 20, please? Yes, sir. Luke chapter 1, verse 18, 19, and 20.

Read. And Zachariah said to the angel, "How shall I know this? For I am an old man, and my wife is advanced in years." And the angel answered him, "I am Gabriel. I stand in the presence of God, and I was sent to speak to you and to bring you this good news.

And behold, you will be silent and unable to speak until the day that these things take place because you did not believe my words, which will be fulfilled in their time." You know, it's like when Joe DiMaggio had his 56-game hitting streak back in the day for the Yankees. Eventually, the hitting streak came to an end. He didn't get a hit in a game.

I guess that's what happened here. According to Sakari, Zachariah was perfect his whole life, righteous 100%. And then the angel comes with a message directly from God, and he has disbelief and is punished with muteness because of his disbelief.

All you got to do is read the entirety of the chapter, and it'll let you know it's not talking about literal perfection without sin or without flaw. Otherwise, it wouldn't make sense why Zachariah is punished for his sin of unbelief.

And we're not banging on Zachariah. We might have all done the same thing, but the point is that's because he's human and sins too. He's not perfect in the way they're meaning it to say. Saying he's a faithful Israelite.

So do you guys see that? He's mute until he gives the name later on. Now, this should be enough, but we should just look at all the passages I mentioned before that describe all of humanity under the curse of Adam and in sin and all the passages talk about Jesus being perfect and from God who did no wrong.

You know, his enemies couldn't find any fault with him. And so Jesus is not just a different, better version of Zachariah, you know? And neither is... Because I could imagine one of them saying, "Yeah, what about Elizabeth? She didn't sin."

You know, just because it doesn't mention her with the disbelief part, but it's real ludicrous for them. Now, they also use Job too, but I feel like one's enough for now. And of course, Job is, you know, he vexed God in the whirlwind, so that should be clear by that.

But nonetheless, they're not understanding what's being said in Luke 1. They're simply just not understanding it, and all you got to do is read the passage. Yep, that's tough.

All right, now let's get to this final part here where my boy KP brings out this verse, and y'all just watch what happens. It's too funny. It's too funny. I'm just going to let this one play out.

Yeah, just let it play. I'm about to mute myself. That justifies the ungodly. Him that worketh not, but to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly. His faith is counted for righteousness.

The guy was reading it as the leader was saying it was faith is counted for unrighteousness. It's... And he was all strong about it. It was like, "That's not what the verse says, man." That's your presupposition overriding your visuals right there.

Hey, man, real quick, Sakari, maybe for the Atlanta camp, you guys need to get one of them large print Bibles, you know, like the books Grandma used to have. Let make sure that man can see what's in the text. He can see, man.

Make sure, you know, maybe the guy's font was set too small on his phone or something. But the thing is, he was saying that's what the verse said like that. Oh, man, that's wild. Too good, too good.

Thank you guys for super stickers. Thank you guys for the super chats in this one, man. This is what I would say in that last moment, KP, man, you are a humble man. You are a humble man, a gracious man, as Vocab said.

Because if it was me, I would have made... I would have sat there and made them read it out loud again, and I would have shoved their face in it. I would have shoved their face in it, bro. You so gracious. You let them pass.

Like, you know, you caught them out on that one, but you... Man, woo, you better than me because their faces would have been in that mud when they made that mistake because that was huge.

All right, but everybody, make sure you subscribe both to KP Serves, who was in the video doing the evangelism confronting the Hebrew Israelites. Subscribe to my brother right here, VAP Malone. His link is in the description. His name is in the title of this video.

All you got to do is click his name. It takes you straight to his channel. Hit the subscribe button. A lot of this content, guys, a lot of this meat, very knowledgeable. And I just thank God for him.

Thank you, Vocab, so much for coming through for your boy, man. This was a good one, man. We got, like you said, we do hour. Yeah, KP, thank you for doing what you did out there.

And D News, right? I saw one of her comments. She said we need to close up with that reader's face. We really do, but we really do. But God Logic, let me know. Maybe it's past. Maybe you don't want to.

I'll do it on my channel if not, but if you're down and want to do the review of your discussion with H, I took out all... I got all the clips. I've got them all saved and lined up.

Yeah, yeah, I'm down for that. Let's actually do it next week, man. Let's do it next week. All right, I'll be all right. I'll get with you. God bless. Thanks for having me on, y'all. God bless.

Thank you, Vocab. I appreciate you, brother. Everybody, if you haven't done it already, make sure you guys hit the like button. If you haven't done this yet, go ahead and subscribe.

We do this all the time. We deal with the cults. We deal with the cult of Islam, that false pagan religion. We deal with the cult of Hebrew Israelism, that false pagan religion. We deal with Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormonism, even atheism from time to time.

You know, we deal with oneness, modalism. We deal with all types of Unitarians. We deal with all of these falsehoods that try to rise themselves above the gospel of Christ.

So make sure you guys support the ministry by liking the videos, sharing them. You have my permission to clip. Just, you know, give your boy a tag. Just tag me if you're going to clip this up and stuff like that. Just mention me so they know where it originally comes from.

But other than that, go ahead and share, spread it. I hope that you guys learn. Make sure you guys take notes because a lot of this stuff just sitting in here can go over your head like a few days later.

So make sure you guys are taking this seriously, taking notes so that you guys can also go in the streets when you see these false preachers that you're confident enough and equipped to be able to combat them and put them in their place in front of listeners so that other people are edified and that God's name be glorified.

That's the reason why we do this, to bring glory to God. All right, with that being said, guys, subscribe to KP Serves, subscribe to VAP Malone, and I'll see you guys tomorrow when we continue our regular stream.

All right, peace be unto you guys. Christ is King. Christ is Lord. And that's it. That's [Music] all. Oh, my God Logic. [Music]