Transcription
Do you measure your ketones? Here's something a lot of people don't realize. Not all ketone tests are measuring the same thing. Urine strips measure accetoacetate, which can be useful early on, but becomes less reliable as your body gets better at using ketones. Breath meters measure acetone, a byproduct of ketone production, but not the main ketone circulating in your blood. Blood meters do measure BHB, the dominant ketone your body actually uses for fuel. And now continuous ketone monitors measure BHB over time, giving you a full curve instead of one isolated reading. That matters because a single number can't show you what happened after a meal or overnight or throughout the day. So, the real question isn't just am I in ketosis, it's what is my body actually doing over time.
This is lecture 152 of the metabolic classroom. Welcome back to the metabolic classroom. I'm Ben Bickman, metabolic scientist and professor of cell biology. Today we're going to talk about how to measure ketones. That of course is relevant for anyone who's interested in metabolic health and understanding metabolic flexibility and fuel use. Three established consumer methods have been around for years. That's urine strips, breath analyzers, and the finger prick blood meters. But now there is also a fourth which is the continuous ketone monitor. And that represents a pretty new category and one that I think changes what's possible when it comes to metabolic measurements in ways that the older tools are just li too limited to really help with. Collectively though, the four approaches do differ in ways that go beyond convenience or price. They differ in what molecule they're measuring and including when they measure it and how reliably the number on the screen or the number that you're given reflects what's actually happening in your blood or in your circulation. So to get things started uh let's discuss how to make sense of some of these methods in in in order to do that we need to just have a brief primer or review of physiology and some biochemistry which is just to review what the body actually produces when it shifts towards fat-based fuel metabolism because the four commercially available testing tools don't all measure the same molecule. And that distinction is pretty important and it's an important one to keep in mind as we work through the strengths and the limitations of each of these approaches.
When the liver ramps up ketogenesis in response to low insulin, of course that could be low carb diets or fasting, we have the increased delivery of fats from atapost tissue to the liver. So again, that has to happen when insulin is down. And then the liver begins burning all that fat in the midst of the low insulin and turning some of that fat burning into what is commonly called ketone bodies or we can just call them ketones. Now only they're not all true ketones in the strictly chemical sense, but we're just going to lump it into that. The first of these ketones to appear is accetoacetate or what we could call the mother of the ketones. that is the direct product of of that ketogenic pathway and it's the precursor to the other two ketones from accetoacetate we have an enzyme called BHB dehydrogenase and that generates beta hydroxybutyrate which we usually shorten to be just BHB that becomes the dominant circulating ketone species during sustained ketosis and it really does uh it accounts for about 70% % of any energy that the body is getting from ketones. So when you think about the ketones that are are burning, BHB is the majority of that. But there's a third member of this ketone trio and that's acetone. It's formed by a spontaneous um decomposition or breakdown of accetoacetate. So it's not enzyatic. You do have that one enzyme, the BHB dehydrogenase producing BHB. But then the accetoacetate can also just break down spontaneously into acetate. It's very small. It's or sorry into acetone. It can break down into acetone. It's small. It's volatile. And because of that unique chemical structure, it can be exhaled through the lungs. Now, here's the important point. In the midst of all of this description, each of these three molecules ends up in a different compartment, if you will, at different proportions. And each of these commercial measurement methods will target a different one with one redundancy. So the urine strips will measure accetoacetate, the breath analyzers will measure acetone. And then the finger prick blood will measure BHB and the continuous ketone monitor with the newest entry to this field will also read BHB, but not from the blood like the ketone meter does, but from the interstatial fluid. So that kind of that watery space that surrounds your cells, but it's outside your blood vessel. That would be the space just under the skin, for example. None of these four measurements is wrong um within its own sphere, but they are not interchangeable. Um they're not measuring the same thing in the same places. And this mismatch between what each one detects and what is actually happening in your blood is the greatest source of confusion when someone tries to interpret their results.
As we get into the distinct methods, let's begin with the oldest and least expensive method on the market, which is the urine ketone strip. The chemistry behind the strip has been in clinical use for more than half a century. And it relies on a simple reaction between accetoacetate and a compound called sodium nitropide which produces a purpleish violet color um that you can then compare against the reference scale that you're given on the bottle of those urine strips. The intensity of the color is roughly proportional to the concentration of accetoacetate in the urine. Although the readout is at best semi-quantitative, you're just left to matching shades of purple by eye just by what you're seeing, which means that two people uh examining the same strip could reasonably arrive at two different conclusions, but it would be roughly in the same range. The advantage is that the strips are very inexpensive. They're well under just a few cents per test. They don't require any equipment beyond the strip itself. They produce a result fairly quickly within just a few seconds. And in the early days of a ketogenic state, when uh when a a person is first adopting say a low carb or ketogenic diet and they're generating a lot of ketones uh specifically at a rate that it may exceed what the body is using. So the relative amount of production to use is going to be high. that strip can really give a good strong immediate visual confirmation that something's happening that the liver is producing ketones and that some of them are spilling into the urine. Now the limitations of course are relevant too. The first and most consequential is that the strips read the not the wrong molecule but not the main ketone. Accetoacetate is not the dominant circulating ketone. BHB is because urine acettoacetate reflects what the kidneys have filtered and excreted, not what is currently fueling your body. The urine readings will always lag behind the actual metabolic state when it comes to ketones, often even by hours. So urine output also is affected by hydration. A well hydrated person will dilute their ketones in their urine and so the reading will be a little lighter than you would expect. But a dehydrated person will be concentrating their urine. They'll have more accetoacetate in the urine that they're producing. Not because they're producing more accetoacetate, but because they're not making as much urine. So, it's more concentrated. And it may lead them to a conclusion that their ketones are actually higher than they are. But I mentioned this second limitation, which is this keto adaptation, that when you first start adhering to a ketogenic diet, you're making more ketone than you're using. But over time, the muscles, the brain, other tissues will start using those ketones more. And so the actual amount of accetoacetate that ends up in the urine will drop dramatically, even though your circulating ketones may be just as high as they ever were. In one study of women on a very strict ketogenic diet, these urine sticks failed to detect ketosis in nearly half of the cases where blood BHB was clearly elevated and confirmed through other means. So, you have a pretty high false negative rate and it climbs higher and higher over time. This is the reason that so many people on long-term ketogenic diets become convinced that they've, you know, fallen out of ketosis when in fact they've simply just become more efficient at using the ketones. So, what to take from this? For someone who just wants to have a yes or no signal in the first few weeks of adopting a ketogenic diet, the urine strips are perfectly fine, if perhaps a little inconvenient. After all, you need to take them into the bathroom with you.
The second non-invasive option and one that has become more accessible in recent years is the breath ketone analyzer. These devices target acetone that third member of the ketone trio which forms by that that spontaneous breakdown of accetoacetate. Now because of its unique chemical structure as I noted it's just eliminated through the lungs and it is a waste product. The body does not use acetone in any way for energy. The most rigorously studied consumer devices will use a metal oxide little semiconductor, this little sensor that is selective for acetone. So the the user performs a very controlled exhalation into the device and that is a point of some problem that you have to be very consistent in how much you're breathing out. And then the meter will report breath acetone in parts per million or in some other measurement. Now, the appeal here is obvious. The device is reusable. So, the cost per measurement gets ever closer to zero as you're as you just continue to use it. It's a it was a fixed cost. And so, every time you're using it, it's a little cheaper, if you will. It is genuinely non-invasive. There's no finger prick and there's not even a biological collection like it is with a urine sample. And unlike urine, breath acetone reflects systemic ketone state in something close to real time rather than what might have been filtered into the bladder several hours ago. Now, there are very real limitations here. Like urine, breath analyzers are measuring the wrong molecule. It's acetone in this case rather than BHB. So, the reading is once again a downstream proxy for the dominant circulating ketone. The relationship between breath acetone and blood BHB is is moderate at any single point in time. It's not bad. Um although with with daily exposures um as you if you try to find a direct correlation with BHB, it's it's not great, although it's kind of in maybe an acceptable range. But what you could say is that as you're using the same device repeatedly and you're getting better better with your breathing, it's going to give you a consistent directionality at least. In practical terms, the breath measurement gives you a reasonable estimate then of where your ketones sit on average across, you know, a day, for example. But the single reading does not really reliably tell you a precise BHB concentration at that moment. Now, the second issue, I've kind of alluded to this here, is the interference where the breath acetone sensors are vulnerable to other compounds that can be exhaled like alcohol. If you've been drinking alcohol, that breath ketone analyzer is going to be heavily skewed. even certain foods if there's hand sanitizer residue um in the air or on your hands as you're holding your device and other kind of ambient sources of com of these organic compounds that can just lead to some skewing or mistaken measurements. I noted that the exhalation technique is important. You have to be consistent in how much like how deeply you inhale before you have your exhale, how fast you're exhaling. Anyway, you can start to see how there are a number of variables that can influence the breath acetone or the breath ketone meter in a way that can make it a little fickle.
Now, the next step up in both accuracy and effort is the capillary blood ketone meter. And this just works on essentially the same principle as a glucose meter. You have a small little lancet and it will um poke your skin and it will draw a drop of blood from the fingertip. And then that blood is applied to a test strip and that test strip is loaded with an enzyme that reacts with BHB and then the meter will read the electrochemical signal that comes from that enzyme reaction and then it will give you a number and that number will be in millime uh mill moles per liter because BHB is the species that primarily circulates. That's the main ketone. This is the measurement that most directly answers that that practical question of just how much ketone is in my blood. Studies that have compared um several of these portable meters against laboratory very thorough rigorous lab techniques do show good agreement across the full physiologically relevant range of BHB. The advantages are obvious with this one. It's a true quantitative reading of the dominant circulating ketone and you can get it within seconds for most purposes. U verifying nutritional ketosis in in a person if you're wanting wondering whether you're fat adapted or you're tracking the response to even an exogenous ketone supplement like you you take some go BHB and you want to see how well it's worked. that finger prick meter is what what has been considered a a practical gold standard outside of the research laboratory. Now the drawbacks are mostly practical rather than um scientific. The strips are pricey um and which can limit how often you measure but the procedure is also uncomfortable. It's invasive and if you're trying to measure your ketones multiple times a day, you're going to feel it on your fingertips. as a person who's done that, it can in fact get quite uncomfortable. But the result is also a little uh episodic, a single number that you get in that moment. Um it's it's not giving you any information as to where your ketones were an hour ago or in the minutes between that hour and and the moment you're measuring. Um and and so because it also requires a very deliberate effort like you have to make yourself bleed uh most people will end up testing just more when it's convenient rather than it might be might be uh the most informative and indeed they may end up not measuring as often as they would benefit from.
Now, that last point brings us to the most recent entry into the field, and that's the continuous ketone monitor. And that's actually the device that I personally have been wearing right now. My sleeves are too long for you to show me, but I have um a se a continuous ketone monitor from Sib Bio. Um it's made by Sibionics. That's the company. And I'm wearing one now. And to my knowledge, it's the only continuous ketone monitor available to the general consumer. Although I know there are other manufacturers working on this as well um and that are you know at various levels of development. So I'll refer to the side bio sensor because that's the one I know and that's probably the one some of you have used um previously because it's it is getting more common. That sibio sensor works on the same general principle as the continuous glucose monitor. You have a small little filament that's inserted just under the skin. So that's what you kind of punch into your skin with the the applicator. It's actually often totally painless, but you put it up against the skin and you push the little button and it just pops it again into your skin and and that little sensor that's embedded into your skin just very shallowly. it is in that interstatial fluid space and then within that sensor you have that enzyme that same kind of enzymebased electrochemical reaction that will target BHB but of course it's getting it from that interstatial fluid and then you get the electrical signal that is then going to be transmitted via Bluetooth to your phone to an app on your phone and then you can get a reading every few minutes that's the difference whether you are deliberately checking or not the device is sending a reading to your phone. So, every time you open up the app, it can, let's say you haven't opened the app up all night and you wake up in the morning and look, it sort of it will backfill, if you will, and you're able to look back in time to see the measurements all through the evening. Now, when you first put it on, the sensor takes about an hour to warm up and then it's going to go continuously for 14 days. Um, and the nice thing about these devices is that they come factory calibrated. So, they're designed just to work straight out of the package. You don't need to do any kind of finger prick to calibrate it.
Now, there are, of course, some very real and obvious advantages. The first one is just the sheer amount of data you're getting. Instead of maybe two or maybe three discrete numbers per day like if you were using the blood meter, the continuous ketone monitor will produce near uh several hundred of readings every day. You can then see that full trajectory. You can see the pattern of your BHB rather than just any one single isolated point. the the patterns that you get emerge from continuous data that you simply cannot get from those intermittent spot checks. And once you've seen those patterns, what to me is so valuable is that it becomes much harder um to make a mistake um or rather I'll say that another way, it becomes better um at you um being able to see these trends and responses. And the second the second advantage is just the absence of a finger prick. Once you put the sensor in place, you can forget about it. And indeed, it's easy to forget about it. You don't feel any lingering discomfort or pain. And so that it removes a lot of the friction that limits how often you might test if it is just the blood prick method. And the third is that the device is measuring BHB, that same molecule as the finger prick meters, and it's the main ketone. It's the molecule you want. So the the molecule that is being detected is the right one. The most um directly relevant data that we have on this with regards to peer-reviewed papers was a study presented at the American Diabetes Association meetings in which that SI bio um ketone monitor was compared against capillary BHB measurements in adults and in this case it was in people with diabetes um but I'm not giving any kind of medical advice here and they found that the absolute difference between the continuous sensor and the finger prick reference was within just you know about 0.1 point.2 mill moles per liter. So pretty darn close usually within about 20% um of a relative difference. Now you'd say well that's not perfect. Yeah but the overall trend over time is I think what matters most. You having a difference of 0.1 or 0.2 millmer matters less than you seeing what happened while you slept or you seeing what happened the hour or two after you ate a specific meal. Now further with regards to the evidence, there was a small randomized trial that used the Cybio CKM to track the response to an oral ketone supplement and they found that the sensor captured the expected rise and fall of BHB in real time. But it also reported a gradual day-to-day decline in the area under the curve um over that period of time which might have been a little bit of drift or it might have been just a bit of a delayed or a diminished response to the um supplement. The device is very good at showing you the or generating at all just the the a curve that you can see the shape of this curve within any given day at any moment even if the absolute number is off by 0.1 or so it I think the relative trend that slow trend um that you see um is the most valuable feature. Now further I can say from personal experience that wearing the sibio CKM I'm able to detect changes in BHB whether I have taken um a a BHB supplement whether it's the D form of the two enantiurs or even the L form with the L form potentially being more of the signaling molecule but I've taken LBHB and I've detected a big increase in BHB levels so So it at least in my experience appears to measure both.
Okay. A few additional points. This um the Cybio CKM like any of them is not currently approved by the um US FDA as a medical device. So if you're getting it, it's sold in the US as a wellness or or a lifestyle product. So it's not meant to be used to diagnose or to treat or monitor any kind of disease state. You're doing it because you're curious. Also, like any interstitial fluid sensor, including a continuous glucose monitor, there is a a small physiological lag relative to blood on the order of a few minutes. So, during periods of rapid change in ketones, the displayed number is going to be a few minutes behind what's truly circulating in your blood.
Okay. Now, what about just kind of more insight into every day? Uh, and I say this as a as one who's been using these devices for a while. Um, beyond the technical specs and the validation, I think that the more interesting question is what wearing the device actually shows you in everyday life. Because the advantages of the continuous data become much more concrete once you have watched your own curve unfold over a few days and there are a handful of patterns that emerge almost immediately for most people. The first is the overnight curve which is more variable than people often assume. Ketones tend to climb during fasting hours including sleep. But then in the early morning hours there also there is this is this unexpected maybe a little bump where you have some uh bump I should say slump rather where in the morning you have the counter regulatory hormones like cortisol surging. That's the the dawn phenomenon. And that can blunt um not only stop the ketone rise, but even bring it down a little bit. The the single finger prick reading that you take in the morning may may just it may lose all of the ketosis or the ketone spike that's been happening overnight. So you may measure it at a peak or you may measure it at a at a valley or anywhere in between and there's really no reliable way to know without the continuous data.
Then the second benefit, as I've alluded to, is the meal response. This is where I think the device delivers the value that no other ketone monitoring device can match. A meal that you may have assumed was clearly within a ketogenic range um uh may produce may actually suppress ketones over the next two to three or four hours. While foods that you thought might be problematic may not really register at all. So, an example of this is that you may take I just saw an ad, for example, of of ke keto friendly donuts. I wouldn't be surprised if you ate a keto friendly doughnut and you found your ketones went down. Now, on the other hand, let's say you baked a potato and you refrigerated it. Now, you're taking it out again and reheating it. You may find that that does almost nothing to your ketones because there's such a relatively modest glycemic and insulin response. And the patterns that that matter most in all of this in the end is just that these curves are deeply individual. You can have two people on the same diet. They eat the same snack or meal or drink and they may have different ketone trajectories. They may not look anything alike even though they they ate the same thing or drank the same thing. And that I think is the single best argument for measuring that with with the CKM is that it really gives you insight into your own response. very analogous to partly of why I'm such an advocate of CGMs that with a continuous glucose monitor you're just able to get so much personalized information and then with the CKM you're getting the same albeit in the realm of ketones.
So where does this leave a person trying to decide between methods? Yes, urine strips are cheap. Um they're disposable just sort of binary yes or no signals. Generally the breath analyzers are are noninvasive but of course they're they're a little fickle. Then the finger prick is a very accurate method but it is literally painful and it can start to add up. And then you have the continuous ketone monitor and that is the tool that I think is best. It show it's the only one that can really give you patterns rather than points and it lets you just see how your physiology is actually reacting and behaving across very big periods of time. Uh and for that sort of personal experimentation that you want uh you just cannot get that when the data points cost a dollar and a finger prick and a fresh lancet every time. That's it. Class dismissed. Until next time, more knowledge, better health.