Transcription
Hey everybody, Dr. G here. I'm a clinical and forensic psychologist as well as a body language expert. And today we're going to be analyzing more craziness from the Epstein files. Before we get started with this, couple of quick things. One, I wanted to make sure you know this is not a psychological evaluation of any kind. These are just my opinions. In addition to that, I do want to remind you to like and subscribe if you want to see more content just like this. All right, let's go.
What we're going to be analyzing today is another wide range of strange Epstein files. We're going to be looking at whether or not Ghislaine Maxwell could possibly be an impostor. I've had tons of people email me about this. I'll explain that in a minute. We're also going to be looking at Jeffrey Epstein's obsession with jerky. Got some pictures to look through as well. All right, let's just jump right in.
The first email we're going to look at is by entertainment publicist Peggy Seagal. It stood out because it mentions Tom Hanks, but the context is a little bit complicated. We're going to read through it. We're going to talk about it, then we'll keep going. This email was sent by Peggy Seagal a couple of days before Thanksgiving in 2013. She sent the email to two people, Jeffrey Epstein and a man named David. It gets a little confusing because she's addressing both of them, but that we have to factor that in as we're reading this.
"David, you are right off the coast of Jeffrey's private island called Little St. James. He has Richard Branson coming, too. We know that's a fact because we've seen pictures of Richard Branson there. He wants to invite you to come on shore and see his compound. Alan Grubman says, 'You're both smart and funny.' I agree. Don't cry for me. I'm having lunch at Martha Stewart's in Connecticut. We'll try not to eat the fattening stuffing. Then screening Saving Mr. Banks in East Hampton Friday night and Sandy Gallon is doing a dinner. We have Hugh Jackman and Matthew Brick leading a singalong to Mary Poppins songs, jealous."
So Peggy Seagal is up doing her thing with Matthew Brick, Hugh Jackman and all these people and she's talking to David and Jeffrey Epstein who are both right either on or near Little St. James. Then she says, "Happy Thanksgiving. If Tom Hanks is around, tell him his Walt Disney is a big hit."
Now this is interesting because this implies one of two things. Either that Tom Hanks was with David and they were right near Little St. James and may have gone and visited it, or that she thought that Tom Hanks would have been with Jeffrey Epstein. It's unclear who she's speaking to at this point, but clearly she is making the assumption that Tom Hanks is somewhere in that area. But it's interesting to have a third party making these connections because Jeffrey Epstein tends to be fairly secretive about who he's visiting with unless it's a handful of specific people. Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton. There's a number of people that he is very public about but less public about others. So, this is a very interesting connection to see.
Even though this may only be a loose connection to Tom Hanks, I was curious if he was mentioned anywhere else in the Epstein files. So, I looked up Tom Hanks and apparently someone who had lived in New Mexico claimed that at Jeffrey Epstein's Zorro Ranch in New Mexico that they had been trafficked and that there were highly prominent people including Jeb Bush, Tom Hanks, and others. They said they had a list. Now, obviously, we can't verify the truthfulness of this, but there are other claims. This is actually another time that he is mentioned in a very different capacity. This was not on Little St. James Island. This was at another one of his estates, but as far as Tom Hanks goes, that's it. Other than mentioning his name, it doesn't go into any other details.
Now, I'm going to run you through a few pictures that I found that just show you what a peculiar place the island is. Here is some water that maybe this is purified water. This may be how they clean the water. But he's got all these little trap doors everywhere. This one leads directly into this little pit. If you look at this right here, this temple that he created, this I think was right after it was built or maybe there was some damage that they were fixing on the side of it. But here's what's so strange to me about this temple is that the only thing inside the temple at all is a bed. That's it. There are just a couple of mattresses. That's the whole thing. So why there are just two mattresses sitting in this temple is anybody's guess, but that looks like that's all that's in there.
And here's Woody Allen just as a reminder of how much I dislike Woody Allen. I just think he's a very gross individual. I do not like him at all. And he's just such a close friend of Jeffrey Epstein. He's in the files so much. And here's Epstein taking his typical awkward pictures, which there are plenty of. I thought this was interesting. This is him posing in some sort of traditional garb from somewhere. I don't know if this is Mongolia. It doesn't clarify where he is, but this is something that he does a lot. You know, he likes to pose in these outfits and he just has lots and lots of pictures that are like this.
So, basically, in a recent video, I showed that they found two suitcases. One was blue, one was black, and it was full of contents of expired passports, fake passports, binders full of CDs. It looks like that could be this, but it's unclear. This could be more. I would like to know more about these passports right here because what I don't see is the fake passport. That was green. That was Austrian. We're not seeing that right here. So, this may be completely different passports that were recovered elsewhere. And here's Epstein, per usual, just sort of being weird, posing in weird positions.
Now, this I thought was kind of interesting. This is from Little St. James, the plans to make the Little St. James Island buildings. And if you notice, it says "hidden stair" right here. So, apparently there's a hidden stairwell somewhere. And they even talk about it down here where they talk about "we moved the living room to the south side of the pool and maintained the two south hidden stairs." So, it's interesting that there are some little secret areas within this house. If we've got pictures of them, I'm not sure, but I thought it was fascinating that he actually does have hidden stairways there.
What we're going to be doing next is we're going to be looking at footage of Ghislaine Maxwell from 2016 and comparing her to footage from this year. There are a lot of people online that seem to believe that she's an impostor now, that it is not the same person. So, now we're going to look at some of this behavior and body language, and we're going to see if anything has actually changed. We're going to see if it could possibly be a different person that was that is currently incarcerated.
>> "For me, all the girls that you have met and brought to Jeffrey..."
One thing you're noticing right here during this deposition, she's being asked about all the girls that she's met. You're seeing her withdraw her lips. We do that when we don't want to say anything. So, you can see very clearly she's trying to keep her her mouth shut.
>> "Can you list for me all the girls that you have met and brought to Jeffrey Epstein's house to form a foundation?"
>> "Um, I could only recall my family members that were there and I could not make a list."
Now, there's a slight lisp you hear when she speaks. That's a very important part of the way that she talks. Faking somebody's voice is very, very difficult. So, I want you to be listening very closely to the way that she sounds in this.
>> "I could only recall my family members that were there and I could not."
So, when she said "family members," there's a little bit of a lisp as she says that. That's a very important part of how she speaks.
>> "Make a list of anyone else because that list never happened that I can take off. I'm talking about during the time that you were working for Jeffrey Epstein."
You can also see her sneering a little bit. She does not like this at all.
>> "to do the types of jobs that I listed before. Pool person, uh, secretary, house person, chef."
You hear the rate and rhythm of her speech. It's very specific. I, for example, speak very quickly. If somebody's going to try to impersonate me, they're going to have to talk fast. With Ghislaine Maxwell, she has a slow, rhythmic way of speaking. She has a slight lisp. The sound of her voice is very, very distinct.
Have you ever Googled your own name or email address? Before I had Aura, I did. And wow, it was my full name, my old address, phone number, all sorts of information I did not want people to have. That's why I started using Aura, today's sponsor. If you've ever wondered how scammers get your number or why your inbox is drowning in spam, this is why. They're companies called data brokers that collect and sell your personal information to marketers, scammers, and yes, even stalkers. They do it without your permission. The good news is they're legally required to remove it if you ask. The only issue is that it's time-consuming and they make it as confusing as humanly possible. This is where Aura comes in. They take care of the hard part for you. Automatically requesting removals from these data broker sites and keeping your info off of them over time. In the first two weeks, you'll see exactly where your personal data is exposed and start watching it disappear without you lifting a finger. It's an all-in-one digital security tool that gives you alerts if your personal info appears on the dark web, real-time fraud alerts for crediting and banking, 24/7 identity monitoring, a secure VPN, antivirus, password manager, and more. Plus, a $5 million identity theft insurance policy, and US-based fraud experts available around the clock. You can try Aura free for 14 days at aura.com/drg. That's enough time for Aura to start scrubbing your info off all of these data broker sites automatically. I'm not leaving myself vulnerable, and you shouldn't either. Go to aura.com/drg and get started with your 14-day trial today.
All right, back to the analysis.
>> "At least that's how far we know that I can think of that uh fulfilled any professional capacity."
You can see she's leaning towards her left side as she gets uncomfortable. Let's look at her currently. Let's look at her when she testified in front of Congress. All she does is plead the fifth over and over again, but it'll give us some idea if or how she looks different.
>> "I would like to answer your question, but on the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer this question."
So, if we look at this recent video of her talking to Congress, her posture is actually quite similar. She looks a little bit heavier, but in general, the posture is the same. Let's see what else we notice about the way that Ghislaine Maxwell looks right now.
>> "And any related questions? My habeas petition is pending in the Southern District of New York."
So, there's a couple of things I noticed. One, the rate of speech is the same. She has the same sneer on her lip that she had before. Listen closely to the S's. Those are very, very difficult to fake. So, to do something like that consistently would be extremely difficult. So, for anybody who thinks that this actually is not Ghislaine Maxwell, everything is telling me that in fact, it very much is the same person. We'll talk more about the features in a minute, but just listen to this.
>> "My habeas petition is pending in the Southern District of..."
So you hear when she says "Southern"
>> "...New York. I therefore invoke my rights."
See, if you look at the left side of her mouth, it does tend to go up when she's speaking.
>> "Silence under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution."
You can also tell that she's had a lot of Botox above her upper lip is very flat. I do think that that it there there are aspects about her that look different just because she's had work done. She's aged. She's gained weight. She's not made up. When you think about when somebody gets a makeover, for example, they can look like a totally different person. This is her after she's been in prison for a couple of years. Her hair is not done the way it normally is. Her face isn't done the same way. I also think that the angle being low makes people think that the nose looks more different than it actually does and the fact that it's low quality.
So, let's watch a little bit more and then we'll finish this part up.
>> "I invoke my Fifth Amendment right to silence."
So other than it being 10 years later and her having had some work done, this very clearly is still the same Ghislaine Maxwell we have always seen. Her voice sounds the same, her body movements are the same, her inflection is the same. Nobody's going to be able to mimic Ghislaine Maxwell this well. So for everybody that's concerned about the fact they feel like her nose, her ears look different, well the nose and ears grow throughout the course of the lifespan. Over the course of 10 years, you have some work done. Your face continues to grow. You've gained some weight. You look a little bit older. I think that's all we're seeing here. This is just the natural progression of someone who's aging that has also had some work done along the way. Very much still the exact same Ghislaine Maxwell that we have always had to deal with.
Now we're going to go to December 12th, 2016. So this is from somebody to Deepo Chopra. "Hello Deepo. Just circling back. Might you like to join Jeffrey, Woody Allen and Suni for dinner tomorrow night at Jeffre."
So here's an email from the following day. It looks like someone sent it to themself, but there were just a couple of aspects of this that stood out because once again they're just peculiar. Says "JP makes up his own rules. Moorings, picnic tables, building up in the retaining wall, heli, protective cove, marine reserve, rookery." See, this looks like Epstein emailing himself, but why they would blur out that it's to and from Epstein. That's what's so strange to me. Maybe it wasn't, but this is exactly the way that he writes to himself. We're going to look at another one from to and from himself in a second that's very consequential. But there's a few things that stood out to me.
So he wrote: "Trees 40% dump fuel station clean beach cleaning by hand single axle clean beach by hand chop up trees access whenever they want doc Michelle violation bury side of hill." To remind to to bury something on the side of the hill. So as we get these little fragments as we try to piece together what other emails are around this, sometimes another picture emerges. I at least wanted to cover this because it was so odd. Occasionally I'm coming back through and combing through different Epstein files and I'll go, "Ah, it's related to this." That's part of why I wanted to cover this. To me, it sounds pretty strange. Some of the the elements or some of the reminders are pretty odd. "Access whenever they want. Bury side of hill." All of that seems peculiar.
Now, here's an email that Jeffrey Epstein sent himself on November 6th, 2014. What we're going to do is we're going to look at all of these weird idea fragments, and we're going to try to figure out what it all means. So the subject is "Hypocrisy." Jeffrey Epstein said, "Thought you might like to know. I'm doing a piece on hypocrisy amongst the very rich. Examples of pious people with mistresses, drug use, tax evasion, lying to wives, shareholders, public board members, claiming awards only after giving millions of dollars to institutions, infighting with mothers and sisters, friends stealing, illegal borrowing from public companies, bank fraud, wife stealing diamond necklace from house after mother found dead, putting private detectives to follow sister, technically bankrupt, racist gang stuff, public lectures on behavior through personally flawed."
So what he's saying right here is he has dirt on everybody and these are just the things he's willing to talk about. So the idea that Jeffrey Epstein has dirt on people, he's very much saying right here in very clear black and white terms that's precisely what he has and he knows it all. That's what he's saying. "Never called after some amount of years of friendship. Wife made allegations that would incriminate principal, although he clearly doesn't know how to spell principal." That just looks like a bunch of gibberish, but I'm pretty sure that's what it's meant to say. "Did he know of issues, etc. Threatened to push wife downstairs, litigious phony titles of trust, fed wife antibiotics, plastic surgery, neck, eyes, therapist."
Now, "fed wife antibiotics." Now, that's very interesting because that's something that he claimed that Bill Gates tried to do or that he claimed that he should do or something like that in a different email. I'm not saying that this is about Bill Gates, that these phrases are about him, but that is a theme with Jeffrey Epstein. He has talked about giving wives antibiotics before. Whether or not that's connected to this, obviously, we can't say, but the fact that that came up again is very, very interesting.
Now, the next part: "Girls under 25, long-term affairs, extortion paid, revenge blank." So he's talking about people being extorted. Whether he's referring to that he's extorting people or somebody else is extorted, it's unclear. And he writes like this intentionally so that it's he's the only one who can fully translate it. "Cigars customs unrelated third party public speeches contrast reality."
Now it gets very strange as we go into the last part. "Dogs shooting girls stock sales tax estate took on mother sister. Land, lying to wife, fireboat, captain security, gift tax, horses, cheap, strawberries, lights, cash flow, planes, etc." Please note, and when he does "please note," that's something that he expects to come back to. But "dogs shooting, girls," all of these little bits that stand out in here show that he's got some very strange thoughts that he's working with, potentially some very peculiar behaviors that Jeffrey Epstein is engaging in, not surprisingly. But we don't get a lot of unfiltered Jeffrey Epstein. He is very careful about what he puts in writing. He writes in a very careful manner. So when he says something, when he makes reference to something, he typically does it in a way to where he could have plausible deniability where he could say, "Oh no, I didn't mean anything by that." Or "I meant something else." So when we get these little fragments of things that he's thinking about, sometimes it stands out as meaningful.
Now, we're going to read about Jeffrey Epstein's obsession with jerky. Now, this may sound a little bit strange, but it is worth going into because it does go somewhere very peculiar. When I first started reading these, I thought, you know, it can't be that bad, but it gets pretty odd.
So, this is the first email we're going to look at. It's from 2013. It says, "Francis has time to come tomorrow to show me how to make it. Jerky class, anyone? He will also bring you a taste of his new jerky recipe from the restaurant." And sends a warm hello. He's working at a restaurant called Cannibal and Cooks. Wait for it. Beef jerky and steak. He has time at 3 p.m. tomorrow. If this is okay with you." Jeffrey Epstein replied, "Yes."
Now, we're going to go down to another email. By the way, when you type in "jerky," 380 hits come up. So, jerky is mentioned a lot. I'm just going to go over the ones that stand out to me, but the first few are pretty normal emails about jerky. "Jeffrey Epstein is asking to bring him more beef jerky on Friday. Are you also flying on Friday? If not, I would like to collect it from you and take it with me on the plane. Please let me know. Thanks." And then it says, "I'm flying on Friday. I will bring jerky." So, another email about jerky. Seems a little bit strange, but maybe people just really like jerky. No big deal.
All right, now we're starting to get to where it's a little bit stranger. "Just wanted to touch base about jerky. Jeffrey Epstein said he was going to start eating regular food again, so he might be eating less jerky." So, first of all, "eating regular food again." That's a I don't know what was going on with him in 2012. I tried to figure this out. But the idea that he's going to start eating regular food again and maybe eating less jerky, that is an incredibly strange statement. Like I said, it is going to get even weirder. But that in of itself, very, very odd. He said he has six bags of it in the downstairs freezer for his next trip. Now, if you saw me, there was a podcast I did a couple of weeks ago where we talked about this. Most people do not freeze jerky. You do not have to put jerky in a freezer. That's kind of the reason it's jerky because you can leave it out or it's something less extreme than freezing it. So that in and of itself, once again, is very, very strange.
Here's another one. "Steve Hansen is sending jerky to your attention overnight." And the reply is, "He does not like he does not like what he made last time." And then another reply, "Uh oh, I'm sure someone over there will like the jerky then." And then a smiley face with a wink. As we keep going, "Should Blank be making more jerky?" That's to Jeffrey Epstein.
Here is where it starts to get very strange and this is very puzzling to me. If anybody has a good explanation for this, let me know. "Jeff, old saying, dog ate my homework while dog ate ate the beef jerky. I was looking for the beef jerky as I knew it was in my suitcase and thought and thought maybe I left it at the beach only to find a small plastic bag near my dog bed. Hence, no beef jerky."
So, the dog ate the jerky. Okay, I'll email Francis to make us some more as I need six to eight ounces to send to the lab and I'll forward Francis the info to send to the lab directly. I'll try you later today. Now, that is where it starts to get a little strange. Why you need to send jerky to a lab, particularly jerky that wasn't even made yet, that stands out is very, very strange. I'm just going to keep going through these and then we'll talk about it all at the end.
Another one. "I heard you are not fond of the batch of jerky from Steve. There's still some left from Francis in the freezer at 71st. Can I organize to have it FedExed down? Blank is going to try to attempt to remake Francis's. I am liaising with blank about raw ingredients in the original recipe."
Now, here's an email from Jeffrey Epstein about jerky. "I'm concerned that after being off and then being back since Monday that somehow I have no jerky again. I am very, very annoyed." And then he gets a reply. "I have jerky ready to mail today, but you said you'd be home tomorrow." But the the intensity of his irritation that he does not have his jerky.
Here's another one. "How's your jerky situation? Should I bring any more?" Here's a weird, very almost aggressive interaction about jerky once again. So, here Jeffrey Epstein emailed Steve Hansen. "Hope you're feeling better. Did we analyze the jerky?" Hansen replied, "For real, my dog got into the bag when I returned, ate the jerky. Francis is making another six ounces, which is what they need, so I can send it off. Feeling better, thanks. Actually did a half my run today, which I'll take for now. How is the island? We talked about this at the ranch. Why isn't it done?" A very annoyed response because he wants this jerky analyzed. Analyzed for what still perplexes me. I'm not sure what you need to analyze jerky for, but they're very clear about that. "Steve needs a six to eight ounce portion of jerky. I gave you all the jerky we had, roughly two pounds, and it lasted only half the amount of time it was meant to. I felt it was more important for you to have the jerky to eat during my time off." And then Epstein replied, "Do you mean you prepared only three ounces per day?"
So the final email basically says that they took about 20 to 30 pounds of raw beef to make all the jerky he needs and that if I'm going to make more going forward, that's not the problem. I just need to get more gear. Steve will have the jerky by tomorrow. It's just the strangest interactions about jerky. I'm not insisting it's about something else, but there are just things about this that are extremely confusing. Why is it that they would talk about analyzing jerky? Why is jerky such a big deal? And why are there over 300 hits when you look it up? And in general, there are other elements where they talk about foods that seem very clearly coded for something else.
Now, here's the strangest part before we move on is there is a picture of beef jerky that was in the Epstein files. It is now no longer accessible. All it is is a bag with a picture of jerky on top of it and it is no longer a file that you can find. So why that was not only it wasn't redacted, it was removed entirely. So why these are the elements that add to the feelings that it's something more, that there's something more to this. Now, it could just be that it's very basic conversations about jerky that are more heated than they need to be, that he's analyzing jerky for God knows why, but that that there maybe this is all you should take all of this at face value. But the fact that they removed the picture of jerky, I find incredibly strange.
So, as sort of odd as some of these emails are, there might be benign explanations for them. This one I cannot wrap my head around. This one is very peculiar because as we've talked about food, food discussions can be very strange with Jeffrey Epstein. So, in this one, an email is sent to Jeffrey Epstein that says, "I would like you to ask Larry Summers if he would meet directly with Jess and another JP Morgan person, Volker rule. I can't do it directly. Larry is getting info third and fourthhand from senators who are getting it from lobbyists."
Here's Jeffrey Epstein's reply, which is what really just blows my mind. "I can say this to him. I am feeling peculiar and going to have to eat something. Do you want me to call it home in half hour?" Now, what on earth does that mean? So, right here, they're talking about meetings. They're talking about JP Morgan people and so forth. Epstein replies that he's going to say, "I am feeling peculiar and going to have to eat something." We talk about coded language. What on earth is that supposed to mean? I don't see how that could be direct. I don't see how that could be anything other than something coded.
All right, we'll go and stop here. Hopefully, this is helping you better understand some of the more strange Epstein files that we're continuing to run across. I am continuing to sort through hundreds of thousands of these files and pulling out anything that seems significant or seems worth analyzing. If you have any comments or there's anything you want me to analyze, please let me know in the comments below. Last thing before we get finished up is I do want to remind you to like and subscribe if you want to see more content just like this. All right, thanks for watching.