Transcription
Catch this rhythm. You feel that? That's called playerism. I'm on the scene, a player clean, poker face, four queens. I got four of a kind on everything. Living elite. I don't feel complete without kicking at my feet in a Rolls-Royce every week. Maybe this is deep. Listen close when I speak. I need to at least I'll be a fool if I love them. You'll be a fool if you trust here with my niggas. We keeping it gangster. Yeah, I'm a slayer. I'm just keeping it player. Player player. I'm fucking her now, man. Eating it later. Maybe why he is a hater. I'm wearing all black like I'm being a raider. You talk to police, we call you a traitor, trader, trader, trader, trader. I'm running the city. They call me for favors. I'm running the city. They call me the mayor. Whitney, my two presidential diamonds as I'm flying Canary Islands on a runway. Fresh Easter Sunday. Yes, I touch the runway. I'm blessed. She looks like she just left the runway. She want to stay with me in this Disney fantasy and never go home like a runaway. I'll be up before the daylight. That's why I'm getting paid, right? I'll be all in. I'll be all in. I work hard and play hard until I hit the graveyard. I'll be all we all win.
>> I am going to be who I truly am because I am remarkable and I'm going to strive every moment to show the greatest part of who I am.
Peace to the Saints. We are back and I appreciate your patience. I just got back into the country today. It has been a very busy time. But in light of the recent news, I really wanted to talk to you because we see that Russia's red line was crossed long ago. You may remember I started speaking about this during the Biden administration. I made predictions all of which were completely accurate. While Biden and the United States government was lying and claiming that Putin could be dethroned, while they were claiming that the Russian government would implode. Now, mind you, you'll notice their lies are consistent. They said the same thing about Iran, regime change. They failed in both cases. But what I did tell you is that Putin was not the monster they were making him out to be. Not very aggressive and as a result he'd get bogged down in a protracted war using conventional means. Putin and Sergey Lavrov at the time said that if the Russian territory was attacked then their nuclear doctrine would come into play. Well, the Ukrainians called their bluff. The Russian territory was attacked several times over the years and they've not moved a muscle. Well, I can't say they haven't moved a muscle. They have actually relocated some assets, namely submarine assets which are actually critical for their kind of retaliatory fire.
When we think about nuclear weapons, you know, there are two systems so to speak. There's the initial system which will usually be an offensive system. Uh, and then if your offensive system didn't fire off, meaning you weren't the country that decided to press the button, probably your what would have been your offensive system is not going to be an adequate defense primarily because that is usually housed in country on land. Then you have your secondary system and this is what creates the concept of mutually assured destruction. And in the case of Russia, this is these are nuclear submarines. So even if you were to bomb Russia's mainland with a nuclear weapon, which was devastating, they would still have an automated response from nuclear submarines that would essentially be able to devastate your country. Uh, and that would execute on the mutually assured destruction. Uh, we're going to get pretty deep today, ladies and saints. As I said, it's been an extraordinarily busy day. We'll get a little bit scientific. I think it's important because often we hear of nuclear weapons and maybe we get scared. There's a little bit of fear associated with that and there should be. And particularly with Donald Trump, there's more fear because when looking at the game theory on something like this, countries may opt to use nuclear weapons just because they want to use them before the other country uses it. And with Donald Trump being a loose cannon and being unpredictable but also aggressive, this would incentivize the counterparty to be more aggressive, right? The Russians to be more aggressive because they know that Donald Trump is liable to do anything. So he is at a high level very much so a an expense and a danger.
So let's go ahead and get into this first source. Let's hear a little bit about what the Ukrainians are doing. And when we say the Ukrainians, we know we're really talking about the United States and the West, you know, the usual characters, France, Germany, Britain, and their funding and at some level probably sending in mercenaries and maybe even their own military, not only as advisers, but also as operators. I'd really be curious to know the state of the Ukrainian air force before this thing started. Right. We have to know that not only does it take time to train up personnel on some of these advanced weapon systems, but also they got to be able to operate it and they have to have enough people to operate them. So there's no doubt that there are a good number of mercenaries and also trained combatants who are coming from various western countries. Let's go ahead and get into this work. Oh yes, and as we go through, if you have any comments, questions, ties, tuition, you can use the information in the banner to support this good work. And we appreciate all of you who do. Shout out to Mr. Chapman came in writing peace to the saints. Very first person to come in supporting the work. And may I also acknowledge via PayPal. Shout out to Calvin. He writes Hustlemania 14. Bro, you better believe it. I also acknowledge Devin writes tuition. Shout out to Ricardo writes peace to the Saints tuition. and Fesus writes peace to the saints as well. And I thank each and every one of you. Make sure I'm not missing anyone on my other email address. And let's go ahead and get after this work. Once the video comes on, if you'd be kind enough to confirm that you can see and hear it by populating an alpha one into the chat once the video gets going. Here we go.
This warehouse in the Moscow region was hit by a Ukrainian drone. One of scores launched at Russia Monday, targeting logistic facilities and oil depots more than 400 km deep into the country. Ukraine also struck seven Russian vessels overnight in the Black Sea and Sea of Azov. Kiev's drone forces come. I really want you guys to take note of the linguistics that are used to describe these actions. Uh, there's no doubt that we are victims of a media that is very far from unbiased and has no idea what objectivity is. You'll notice in some cases when one of the parties that is favored by the media is doing wrong, like war crimes for example, targeting civilian infrastructure, civilian vessels. Uh instead of naming the type of vessel that was struck, they'll say some general term so that you don't think of it as, you know, a commercial vessel. You you assume maybe they were doing the right thing, maybe they were striking military targets, but in many cases it's just not not true. Uh, we have war crimes going on throughout the theaters of war that you observe in the West.
>> Commander published this footage and said that the targets included three tankers and four dry cargo ships.
Okay, now that's interesting. Tankers. Does that mean oil tankers, which is to say commercial non-military combatants? And then it says cargo ships. Again, that would be commercial non-military combatants. Got it. Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky said it was a just response to Russian strikes, adding that the only way to end the war was by increasing the pressure on Russia.
The ever >> Now, this is the kind of thinking of a madman. Russia is in fact a superpower and has been since the creation of the Soviet Union. They were an empire before that, right? They had the Tsar but they were a proper power based on the Soviet Union and once they accumulated their arms in the Cold War, there's pretty much no going back from that. Russia has enormous land mass. They have gas. They have oil. They have population. They also have influence. There are still Soviet former Soviet Union countries that speak Russian. Even if you go to Latvia where popular sentiment is not necessarily with the Russians. You still have a significant number of Russians in the country and everyone speaks Russian still. The young people may prefer English, but they're also fluent in Russian. I know a young lady, she speaks Lalian, which is like kind of her tribal language, if you will, from her village. Uh, she speaks Latvian. So, she's from L Gal, speaks Lgalian. She's uh speaks Latvian, is fluent in Russian and fluent in English. She speaks English the most, but prefers Russian. And this is not an uncommon story when you're looking at Uzbekistan and all of these other former Soviet countries. And some of them missed the Soviet era namely Uzbekistan. They really brought education to Uzbekistan that didn't return to being a backwater following the collapse of the Soviet Union. Then of course you have Georgia which is where Joseph Stalin is from. And these places have significant numbers of Russian speakers and Russians in some cases and a meaningful history and connection to the country. So there's no doubt that at some level we have to know that there's there has to be an intelligence network there. But anyways, um here we are, the Ukrainians bombing inside of Russia, even within the territory of Moscow, which we know is filled with civilians. It's a city and also this is clearly a meaningful incursion because it has crossed the red line but it's also striking a premier city not only a premier city in Russia but a premier city in the world a place you've heard of, you know, so it's really a loud way for the Ukrainians to show hey we have resolve but what they're really doing is showing that they're driven by the same kind of lunacy that a Bibi Netanyahu, a Donald Trump are driven by. It's true madness. And the reason I say it's madness is because the stated claim of Zelensky publicly is that if they can escalate the war, then the Russians will capitulate. Well, that doesn't make any sense. If you escalate, then the Russians are going to escalate because you're a non-nuclear power, right? And you're not a NATO country. So, you're a non-nuclear, non-NATO country suggesting escalation when you have a limited store of weapons, you have limited personnel, you have limited finances behind you. Why wouldn't Russia escalate? Theoretically, they have more people, more weapons, and more finances. Theoretically, and what they're banking on is the will of the American taxpayer and the British, French, and German taxpayer to say, "Hey, no mas." But even beyond that, why would the Russians capitulate based on conventional warfare? Because if you exhaust their means of defending themselves effectively with conventional weapons, then you've kind of forced them to engage the nuclear option. And frankly, the nuclear option is attractive because they're not going to nuke a country that has any nuclear response ability. And that's another reason that Putin should be moving faster. Over, you know, about four years ago, I stated that Putin should have started with a a limited nuke. Um, just just a limited nuke just to say, "Hey, we out here. This is what we can do. We're willing to do it. You're not a part of NATO, so NATO does not have to get involved. They can choose to, but if they do, then we're all going to die. You guys ready to die?" No. Well, then just accept what I did. Timing is important. Timing is actually a critical part of what makes a decision right or wrong. Sometimes it's not about the decision you make. It's about when you make the decision. And Putin consistently has been woefully slow, not aggressive enough.
>> Escalating air war is taking an increasing civilian toll on both sides. Moscow, for its part, accused Kiev of killing at least five civilians in a drone attack in Russia's Belgorod region and injuring 10 near the capital. Came a day after Russia launched one of its largest ever ballistic missile barges on Ukraine. The attacks continued on Monday like here in Zaporizhzhia, killing several, taking advantage of Kiev's critical shortage of air defenses.
So they said killing several but they didn't say several civilians. So, we can presume it was several military men because the reporting on this war is very unfavorable toward Russia. And Russia is not as good as Iran with propaganda. They're not as good at producing propaganda, using humor, being able to degrade the image of the enemy. They're actually quite terrible at that, which is funny because you would think that they would have taken some of that Soviet era propaganda. Uh, but no. And strangely, Russia does not seem very ideological. You know, Putin has very much so ran a Russia that's not deeply ideological. And I understand like the fear behind that because communism was something that the Americans were very staunchly trying to snuff out wherever they found it. So that I totally understand. But there's no doubt that religion and ideology and those things are powerful. on, you know, you really have to give your country somewhere to focus their energy, their hope, faith, belief.
>> Zelensky has repeatedly called for Ukraine's foreign partners to accelerate the supply of the US designed defenses, calling protection against ballistic missiles their top priority.
That's not going to happen. The United States doesn't even have enough defenses for its partners in the Middle East, namely the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait. Uh, I think Saudi is doing just fine. But those other partners who do not have a defense pack with Pakistan, then they're going to need something. We've seen the United States take defensive weaponry out of South Korea and relocate it very far away, which shows a level of desperation because there's just an enormous amount of territory to cover and it shows a shortage. And those are the kind of things that for me, you know, if I were Putin, I, you know, Putin and Iran, I'd be trying to seize on that. And frankly, we know that Iran and Russia are at some level fairly moral actors because I think they have every incentive to coordinate strategy to initiate their attacks or standardize their attacks to try to exhaust American personnel and ability to provide advisory strategy to Ukraine or Israel, you know, by attacking at the same time.
Poll in a government building in Mykolaiv, Ukraine. Rewind this real quick.
>> Uh, >> On March 29th, a Russian cruise missile punched a hole in a government building in Mykolaiv, Ukraine, killing at least 35 people. The sea-launched Kalibr cruise missile used in the attack also can carry a nuclear warhead. Many of the weapons Russia >>
And I just want to give you an example of the delivery systems for these nuclear weapons. And again, think of it in terms of a first wave and a second wave. So we're just looking at a delivery system. So what I'm saying is a missile might, you know, be sent at a particular target, but it doesn't have a nuclear warhead on it. But just the the ability of that particular projectile to get through defenses or the distance that that war that missile can travel is critical because it lets us know who is vulnerable. Um, and distance matters.
Used in Ukraine are nuclear capable, including the Iskander short-range ballistic missile that hit the Ukrainian town of Chaplyne in August and the KH22 cruise missile that devastated a mall in Kremenchuk in June. But experts say they don't know how big the warheads are that these missiles can carry. The bomb dropped on Hiroshima delivered a blast equivalent to 15,000 tons of TNT or 15 kilotons. The weapons that might be used in Ukraine could range from less than a kiloton to several hundred kilotons. According to the Nukemap website created by nuclear.
Now I want you guys to really take that part in. There's a a gap in knowledge meaning these are secret weapons. But in addition to a gap in knowledge, there's also a gap in ability to estimate the opponent. Right? You know, Donald Trump is completely unpredictable. Putin, I think, is quite predictable, but due to the West having their own delusions and them starting to believe their own propaganda, they claim he's a monster. He's nothing of the sort, but them believing their own propaganda and having war hawks and also the military-industrial complex that drives a particular view of the Russians, which frankly has not proven to be accurate at all. You look historically in the last half century, every opportunity the Russians had to be cruel and like really be aggressive, it's like they never took it. Whereas if you look at declassified files from the CIA, you'll see that they they even put together plans and presented to various presidents including Kennedy that involved killing American citizens. Yes, that's right. Killing innocent American citizens and then blaming it on, you know, the Soviet Union or Cuba, what have you, to achieve their ends. So, we find that very consistently the Russians have been fairly upright people and very consistently the United States government, namely through the CIA, has expressed the most immoral, degenerate behavior that you would ever want to see in a government. Go figure. But I think this what he said is really interesting that you know this could be smaller than the scale of Hiroshima and or Nagasaki or it could be a hundred times bigger and it is in that unknown where fear lies.
Now, given the nature of the Russians, I truly believe if they did utilize a nuclear weapon, it would be for warning purposes, and it would not be utilized for the purpose of creating devastating casualties from military or civilian targets. There are two possible ways to detonate such a weapon to show that, hey, we have it, we can use it, we can deliver it on target. You could detonate it over the sea, you know, so like not, you know, over the sea. That's one way you could detonate it over land, but just far up enough that the electromagnetic causes like shutdown of all of the electrical systems on the ground. Um, and also these kinds of detonations would remove the likelihood of radioactive material blowing into Russia. So this one, any of these attacks have to consider weather, right? Wind can blow dangerous material into Russia. Russia is in fact bordering Ukraine, which is why this all started because Russia did not want a NATO militarized country on their flank. So yes, you can hit Ukraine with a nuke. There are levels to it. There's levels to where you can destroy Ukraine, wipe it from the map, but in doing so, using a a truly awesome nuclear weapon, you you are essentially hurting yourself. There's an African proverb that says, if you're swatting a mosquito, that's all fine, but if the mosquito's on your testicles, you're probably going to swat it softly. So you don't want to hurt yourself in the process, right?
Historian Alex Wellerstein. If the Kalibr cruise missile had hit the Mykolaiv government building had carried a 1 kiloton nuclear warhead, it would have killed more than 18,000 people. Within 700 meters of the blast, nearly all but the sturdiest concrete buildings would have been destroyed. Everyone within 500 m would suffer third-degree burns. Fatal doses of radiation would extend. And I want you guys to note that this description that's being given right now of this detonation is presuming that they do what everyday people expect when you think nuclear bomb, which is to send that sucker out and have it land on a target. And they're describing what would happen in that case. But I truly believe that the Russians are both at some level moral, maybe not even as moral as the Iranians because the Iranians are only defensive, but they're the Russians are moral and they're slow. They're not aggressive. So, they're more prone to send out warnings and also to try to bluff the Americans. But bluffing never works with Trump because he's just an aggressive personality. And you cannot feign aggressiveness when you're dealing with a personality that's actually aggressive, like the real deal. Like that's their nature. That's their go-to. Whereas Russia will shift through different strategies to kind of see what different reactions they can get out of the beast. But this is a particular beast. This one just bites your head off. That's all it knows. Uh, Trump is a bit of a one-trick pony in that regard. And and that trick can work in the proper context. I think the Iranian context is not the proper context.
Send out 780 m. Most people in this area would die within a month. Another 15% would die later of cancer. That's assuming the warhead detonates above ground, which does the most damage in the widest area. On the other hand, a ground-level explosion hits harder in a smaller area. The blast would destroy residential buildings up to 460 m away compared to 700 m in an air burst. But within 220 m, everything would be demolished. The ground burst leads to much more radioactive fallout as incinerated debris gets blown by the wind. The extent of the effects depends on winds and weather. So that's what happens with a relatively small 1 kiloton warhead. If the Kalibr carried a 10 kiloton warhead, the death toll from an air detonation would rise to more than 53,000 people. Fatal radiation doses would extend a kilometer from the blast. Collapsed buildings and third-degree burns would reach a kilometer and a half away. Windows would shatter up to 4 and a quarter km away. Experts say the KH22 cruise missile that hit the mall in Kremenchuk can carry a 350 kiloton warhead. Had that been the case in June, it would have killed roughly 100,000 people. Buildings would have been destroyed up to 5 km from the blast. It would have caused third-degree burns to people nearly 7 km away. Depending on the winds, a surface detonation could have sent radioactive fallout all the way back to Russia. And this is considering a target that is in the West, right? This this is west of the border with Russia and Ukraine. So this is stuff that you have to be reasonably careful with. Um, and I trust Russia, Russia has made all of the calculations and knowing that Zelensky is determined. Um, I would for sure exercise that nuclear option, particularly before this goes on too long because what Russia has to know is that the longer Ukraine can go on, it's merely an expression of the quality of their relationship with NATO and the West because NATO and the West, you know, France, Germany, UK and United States, they are the ones that are supplying Ukraine. So the longer that relationship goes on, the the better it is in terms of, you know, being connected and more importantly, not being able to deal with sunk costs, right? It's like, well, we invested all these billions of dollars, it's creeping up on a trillion. We got to win. And then, you know, as time goes on, it begs the question of, are we going to fast-track these guys into being a part of NATO? Why not? Like, what are we waiting on? So, time is against Russia in this situation. Whereas conversely in the Ukraine's Iran war, time is on the side of Iran. So I'd say time is not on the side of Putin. Time is on the side of Iran. But yes, ladies and saints, I'd say we are coming close to nuclear catastrophe. Not as close perhaps as what we saw with the Russian missile crisis in Cuba, but we are in those kind of times. These are exciting times to be alive, truth be told. Perilous times, but exciting. No doubt.
Now, you want to talk exciting? Let's talk exciting. I guess we should look at the the alleged body count first because this is this is news that for sure is propaganda, but but let's hear a little bit of it. We are at four and a half years since the full-scale invasion began of Russia into Ukraine. And what we're seeing now is quite startling. We've got new CSIS data which shows 1.4 million Russian casualties that is killed, wounded, and missing between >>
H are they redefining casualties? Let's see, you know, because I always historically thought of casualty as like a death. So, but let's see. Casualty because a lot of words do get re they get changed. So casualty, a member of the armed forces lost to service through death, wound, sickness, capture or because of their whereabouts. Okay, very good. So we'll take it like that one. Someone has who is injured or killed. Now, not separating that out, I think, is problematic. Uh, because a soldier who is dead is no longer in the game. They're not a threat. They're neutralized. A soldier who is injured can return to the army and continue fighting. So, that's an important distinction for us to be aware of. We want those numbers pulled apart.
February 2022 and then June 2026. So, I want you guys to notice the disparity in the number, which it is fine. These kinds of things do happen, but with Russia being a superpower and Ukraine being a third-rate state that is propped up by another superpower, um, you expect this to be reasonably equal, but it's extremely disproportionate according to what is being reported, which is why I don't trust what's being reported. It's too disproportionate. 6. Among that, we see 450,000 Russian fatalities, which is more than four times more than all US fatalities in all wars since.
>> Now, I want you guys to notice the propaganda. So, now he's referencing back to World War II. But check this out. Russia had heavy casualties in World War II. So, you'll notice he didn't say, "Oh, these are Russia's heaviest casualties since World War II, or Russia's already had situations like this where they lost huge numbers of people." Low-key contextually in recent history, this is not a ton for Russia. But instead, they compare it to the plight of the US in terms of lost soldiers, which is not quite an honest thing to do because you could compare apples to apples, Russia now versus Russia then. Uh, but instead they're comparing it to the United States. But we forget that World War is usually a European conflict. The United States kind of just hopped in there. And when you hop in there, but you're on the other side of the Atlantic, it's very easy to not sustain casualties or losses. Um, because all the other sides, the Germans, the Russians, the French and the Brits, they are incurring death not only from their military personnel but also civilians, you know. Adolf was engaging in total war. So in as much as that is the case, the Americans were only engaging having casualties that were military assets. So why you would even compare the numbers I don't think is very genuine. Um, so be aware of that ladies and saints.
Since World War II. And then we also see just stunningly slow rates of advance and territory. In fact, Russians have lost territory in the last couple of months. So, they have lost the initiative. The Russians are really struggling right now.
>> And that, my friends, was for sure propaganda because the best thing to do when you're talking about Russia struggling would be to pop up a map before the invasion or the special operation, then pop up a map after the special operation and then say, "Okay, well, did Russia gain land? Did Ukraine lose land?" Okay, that's a telltale sign. And in addition to that, we also have to ask ourselves, yeah, you're giving us the casualty rate and casualties like impact our our feelings, but when you're looking at the war from a more detached position and a Machiavellian honest position, you realize that win or lose, the number of persons who met their demise under your leadership or that's not the ultimate goal. The ultimate goal may be gaining land, stealing certain assets or commodities from a country or taking over a port. You know, those are the goals of wars. Preserving human life is never a goal. So to even give this as a meaningful metric or to suggest that this is going to bring about the fall of Putin and the crushing of Russia is ludicrous because it's always an expectation you're going to lose life. And in fact, I do want to make note for everyone that you'll hear a lot of commentators say that Trump, you know, miscalculated how long it would take to defeat Iran. I don't think he miscalculated. I think he misreported, but I think he did that on purpose. I think he wanted to tell everyone, "Hey, I'm going to take out Iran and it's just going to be really quick." He wanted to tell the public that because he knew if the public heard that, they'd say, "Oh, it's not a forever war. We're going to go in there. Be efficient like we did with Venezuela and the next thing you know we're running Iran, we control their oil, we control their ports and then everything goes back to business as normal except it's not normal. America is now dominating in the Middle East in a more overt way." Um, so I think that the Donald knew it wouldn't be easy. And to fool the public, listen to me, to fool the public, he went and pulled that operation in Venezuela against Maduro to show, hey, this is how easily we can do it. This is how good our teams are, our SEALs and our Rangers and all of these different F groups that we have within the military. I just showed you what they can do. We can do this again in Iran. And you can really sell this kind of a narrative to the American public because most of them couldn't point out Venezuela or Iran on a map. That's number one. Number two, they don't understand the topography of Iran. Nor again do they acknowledge the true military advancement, scientific advancement of Iran. So that's what the Donald was trying to do. He showed an easy cakewalk with Venezuela and he says hey I can do this again in Iran but he never had the intention of doing it quickly. And he's not the only person who does that. The same thing is true with Vladimir Putin. You know, he said it was a special military operation. Hell no, Brody. We're four years into the war. We're damn near creeping up on half a decade. That's not a special military operation. Operations don't last that long. You're in a full-blown war that you're not losing, but you're not winning. And I think that's true of both sides. And that's why someone is going to have to do something decisive unless we have a 20-year war. And frankly, at some level, that becomes bad for business. Uh, because you're going to bleed the coffers dry of the United States. You you got to take a break at some point so that they can, you know, that credit society can, you know, kind of, you know, refresh things and then make a whole new purchase from Boeing and Raytheon and Palantir. Um, so that's that. But anyways, I just want to correct the the popular misconception that politicians underestimate how long it'll take to subdue a given country. I don't think that's the case. I think they know it's going to take work. They have analysts for this. They have computerized simulations. They know it won't be easy. So, let us not be fooled by the lies.
The Russian-Ukraine casualty ratio for much of this war has been about three Russian casualties to every one Ukrainian. The new ratio of Russian to Ukrainian casualties in 2026 is roughly 8:1. So eight Russian casualties to every one Ukrainian. And that's because Russia continues to push its forces into deadly front lines. And also >>
Now do I believe that Russia is pushing new front lines? Yeah, absolutely. That's how they're gaining territory. There's no doubt about it. Do I believe that there is a strain on the Russian military to provide bodies for slaughter? Yes. In fact, they're kind of tricking a number of Africans, some of which they're paying a small amount as mercenaries. Others are just flat-out tricking and throwing them on the front lines. And even before that, we knew that I think the name was Prigozhin. Uh, he was a guy who basically organized a private military paramilitary operation. So, we know that they've had struggles um getting the ranks filled, but what is never talked about in the West is if Russia has a bigger population than Ukraine and was more militarized than Ukraine before this, why is it that we're not hearing anything about the Ukrainians struggling to have soldiers and hiring mercenaries and all of that? Why is that all suppressed? Clearly, it's an issue. And furthermore, I know a lot of Ukrainians personally, and mind you, I used to hire people in Ukraine. They've always had fine engineers, but just a bit of a backward country in many regards. Um, however, the women fled and the males who are not allowed to flee face conscription. And there are many videos you can see on YouTube where basically, you know, small gangs of government and military workers show up and converge and then basically kidnap young men. And so the next generation of Ukraine's young men are being sacrificed while the women live in Poland or Bali and they party and have not a care in the world. It's a true story. That's really how it's happening. is quite quite despicable.
>> That Ukraine is involved in a very active and aggressive campaign of drones that are short, medium, and long range.
For the past several years, Russian forces have failed to advance at much faster than a slow, sluggish crawl. We're seeing in the first half of >>
Now, what I want you guys to observe is the propaganda aspect. What you need to observe is the fact that they would like to claim that Russia is losing but Russia is gaining territory, which is a critical thing in war. Uh, the casualties really matter most to the citizens because the citizens are providing their father, excuse me, their sons and their daughters as sacrificial lambs. So they care about the body count, but governments don't. Government only cares about the body count in as much as when it's too high, they won't be able to resupply their soldiers or excuse me, resupply the military with soldiers. So that's where the government's level of concern kind of ends.
2026 that the main concentration of Russian efforts have been focused in the eastern front line of Ukraine along what is typically called Ukraine's fortress belt. That's a grouping of four cities that make up the backbone of Ukraine's eastern defense. Near Ukraine's fortress belt, Russia has been advancing as slowly as about 50 to 90 meters per day. To put that in perspective, that's about the pace of the Battle of the Somme in World War I, which is one of the deadliest battles in human history and is remembered for brutal trench warfare where Allied forces advanced at r. One thing you have to notice when digesting information is not only what is there but what is not there and there this is a logical fallacy in their attempt, their really cheap and unclothed attempt to make Russia look bad or make Russia look like it's losing or engaging this war ineffectively. Uh, well, they're talking about how slowly Russia moves forward. Oh, Russia. Yeah, they're moving forward, but it's so slow. But notice they're not talking about the fact that that means oppositely. If Russia's moving forward, that means Ukraine is moving backward, also known as retreat or defeat, right? They're losing the skirmish, they're losing the battle. The war is still going on, but these skirmishes and battles have been lost on the Ukrainian side, and they're not knowing that. So, we see that they are clearly biased.
Roughly 80 meters a day. Russia's pace in 2026 has fallen dramatically from earlier in the war. In the first weeks during the 2022 invasion, Russian forces drove toward Kyiv at between roughly 3,000 and nearly 7,000 meters per day. Russia was able to advance so quickly because it was moving through territory Ukraine hadn't yet fortified. But today, the battlefield looks very different. The challenge for Russia right now is that it is trying to take Ukrainian territory. And the way it's doing it is by p.
>> It's not trying. Actually, it's been quite successful at taking Ukrainian territory, not only now, but also Crimea, you know, in years past. So, this is there's no trying going on.
Pushing in dismounted infantry into what we call the kill zone. It's a area of between 20 and 40 kilometers between where both sides forces are mostly deployed to.
It's saturated by drones and artillery shelling and it makes it really difficult for any people or vehicles to move along the front line in Ukraine. With neither Ukraine nor Russia able to generate large breakthroughs along the front line in the battlefield, both sides have increasingly relied on a long-range strike campaign to hit.
So what I do want to do at this time is I want to acknowledge some of the folks supporting the work. We appreciate you. And then shortly we're going to move a little bit more into the nuclear talk if you guys don't mind. And the nuclear talk is of course scary, but I believe that you know good knowledge will kind of remove a little bit of fear from all things that you do. Shout out to Clay comes in supporting the work via PayPal. I appreciate you. May I also acknowledge via Venmo. Shout out to the first bowler alert. Emanuel comes in bowling. He writes tuition. Peace to the saints. I appreciate you. Peace to the saints. Also acknowledge Jinx. He writes tuition. Shout out to JinC. And shout out to Luigi comes in via PayPal. He writes peace of saints. Support for the latest works. Really eye-opening and needed. I appreciate. I'm happy to hear it. Shout out to Gwinsley came in supporting as well by PayPal. Iram writes, "Salamu alayikum. Just got up for Fajr and saw this live. I appreciate everything you do." You know, mashallah. It's a beautiful thing to know that you're getting up for Fajr. Thank you for sharing that with us. Walaya salam. Yes indeed. And there is nothing like wudu for Fajr. It just kind of wakes you up. May I acknowledge Wayne? He writes peace to the saints tuition. Shout out to Kirsten writing peace and saints. You are looking extra strong and healthy today, commander. I appreciate that. Thank you very much for that. And that means a lot after being quite low on sleep and you know taking long flights from Latin America. So I appreciate that. That does mean quite a bit. All right. Fantastic. We're caught up for now. Let's work.
Targets well beyond the front line. What's happening right now on the front lines and in around the kill zones is largely the Ukrainians playing defense. But where the Ukrainians have decided that it makes the most sense to conduct offensive action is by targeting the ability of Russia to wage war. And that is long and medium range strike. Now I don't like the way he said that because it almost sounded like a metaphor or a strategy that is referenced by the master Sun Tzu. He says, "The highest form of warfare is to fight without fighting." Huh? Yes. To be able to defeat the enemy without shooting a gun or firing off a missile. Against their logistics, against their defense industrial base. Anything the Russians use to wage war and to support efforts to wage war the Ukrainians are going after right now. And in many ways, actually quite effectively. What we see with CSIS data and analysis on Ukraine's short, medium, and long range strikes against Russia is a big cluster of Ukrainian strike.
>> Now, mind you, all this analysis is quite comical because this guy's an insider. Uh, don't let him fool you. It looks like this is a third party making a video and he's like unrelated to the government, unrelated to mainstream media. If you start looking at CNN, Fox News, you'll find they invite this same guy on and he gives these very desperate numbers on number of persons or number of casualties on the Ukrainian and Russian side. The Russian side is always super high. Uh, so this is their favorite guy. This is the company man right here. Uh, even though it seems like he's independent. Um, so that's important to know. Furthermore, the idea as though he's acting like he's guessing on what Ukraine is doing in the war, well, we when Ukraine is being offensive, we get great reports. Um, whether it's great from a sense of they're they're describing what's happening instead of ignoring it or great in the sense of it can be detailed because America is the one calling the shot. So why wouldn't America know what's going on, right?
Yikes. Just over the border and also in Russian-controlled areas of Ukraine like Crimea. What we also see is a big increase in medium and long range strikes. So we can see cities like Moscow and St. Petersburg have been hit and we also see long >>
Now again, he's not conceding that those are war crimes. Those are civilian populations. Those are places that surely if there was a red line, those would be the ones to protect. Um, so he's not acknowledging any of that.
Long range strike thousands of kilometers away like during Ukraine's operation Spider's Web using large numbers of drones to strike Russian air bases that have strategic bombers. So what we've seen is Ukrainians really build up their capacity in missiles and drones in the absence of an air force indigenously by importing components for those, putting them together rapidly, and then conducting.
Did he say what I thought he said? Did he say that Ukraine did not have an adequate air force? Oh Marquette, that's interesting. You said that earlier and that makes sense. And somehow they're still able to conduct in certain theaters of war where theoretically they should be novice and they should certainly be losing against a superpower. So, this lets you know quite a bit. Lets you know quite a bit. Ladies and saints, may I acknowledge via uh uh actually shout out to Mario just got Boss University and Boss University is a great place to start. Someone that recently asked me about that. I really appreciate what Boss University does to your mindset and also to the way you conduct yourself as a man. You know, there's one thing to know the strategy on being successful. There's yet another thing to know the strategy on making sure that you as a man or as a woman are prepared to be successful at whatever you're going to do. Now that's a different thing. Preparing to be successful like knowing how to position yourself to be successful is a different separate thing than being successful which is or or engaging in the processes of pursuing success. I hope that's clear to you. Which is to say before you do anything, ladies and saints, anything you want to achieve, you have to have the right mindset. You have to have the right emotions. You have to have the right preparation and background. All of that matters just as much as what you're actually doing to be successful. I hope you understand what I what I was saying.
Strikes against Russian targets. One of the most stunning acknowledgements by Russian President Vladimir Putin that Ukraine's medium and long range strikes are having an effect is during Russia's May 2026 military parade where he typically brings out a whole range of soldiers and equipment. They had to scale it back in a significant way out of fear, understandable fear by the Russian government that the Ukrainians were going to strike that parade and it would be a national embarrassment and what >>
Now listen and these people are devils but you know they're they're shameless devils. There are so many different things that the Americans have struck in Iran, school girls, for example, that the Israelis have struck in places that I'm not going to name because we don't want to get the stream shut down. There's so many different targets that are for sure violating war, the rules of war, Geneva Convention, and it's just like, listen, the Neanderthals won't quit. They just will not quit. So, I say all that to say this. Um, Russia, Ukraine, and Iran, they should know anything is on the table. And I always tell you guys that you cannot defeat an enemy that is more ruthless than you. So, I always pride myself on ruthlessness, as does Bibi Netanyahu and apparently Donald Trump, who is really just Bibi.
Netanyahu's like son. But anyways, he was just saying that there was a military parade by the Russians and they were scared to really show their too much of their hardware because the Ukrainians might just hit it and blow up their hardware, which I think would be extraordinarily ruthless and it would be really a bad PR move. But at the end of the day, who cares about PR? Winning wars is what matters. It's it's not about how you look while you're doing it, you know? And at the end of the day, in the final calculation, it just matters who won. Not how they won but who won.
Huh? >> symbolizes too is that war is come home now to Russian citizens in Moscow in St. Petersburg. Their inflation is high. The economy is stagnant right now. But there's also this level of fear that has now impacted many Russian cities because of Ukrainian medium and long range strikes. The fundamental shift in the war. What has Russia gained versus >> Wait, is it a shift in the war? No, I don't think so. I mean, Ukraine is still fighting on the back foot. They still have their own territory to recover. I do think it's smart that they don't try to recover land because that's going to take a lot of resources to make it available and then you have to occupy it, right? And you would think on their own territory that would be easier. But what people are not remembering in some cases is that oh again there are significant numbers of Russian people there. There are Russian speakers there. And so at a level this is a a repeat on history. The same thing that Adolf did um you know and kind of unifying Austria and Germany. You guys might be aware that Hitler was actually not German. He was Austrian. and he's from a little town called Lintz. His uh father was a government bureaucrat and he still joined the German army, fought World War I bravely, but he did come back and say, "Hey, we want to unify for the greater Reich." And there were other places um where there were claims that there were Germans and they were being minoritized and oppressed. and he went ahead and annexed those territories and the people of the territory were at some level were happy. The story sounded right because these people are in fact Germans linguistically and culturally. So the story sounded good. Uh and that's an important piece to consider and Russia kind of has the same story. So in Ukraine there are parts of Ukraine that were already separatist areas. There's two in particular. Um, and when you have those separatist movements that have been going on for a long time and they're Russian speaking, when Russia moves in, they're going to welcome them with uh open arms. And also, when Ukraine's there, they're going to be undermining the influence of Ukraine, the ability of the Ukrainian government to project power. And they're of course going to give intelligence and support and aid to the Russians. So there you have it. Nothing new under the sun.
>> Is what has it lost on the battlefield? In recent years, Russia has gained marginal amounts of territory in exchange for over a million casualties and potentially soon about half a million fatalities. If the goal, and I think the goal should be some type of a settlement or ceasefire, what is going to bring the Russians to the table is pain, which means that the goal of the >> and again these are certain types of people, certain types that they are wicked. And so their calculus is always what can I steal? Uh what can I take? Um what kind of violence and evil can I do? Um, and when you're taking from others, whether you're taking gold, cold tan, uranium, cobalt, uh, ground nuts, oil, whatever you want to take, when you're taking from other people, this is going to cause them to fight. And this fighting at the national level is called war. and being that you're intent on taking these people, then of course they're going to say, "Yeah, well, what we have to escalate. We have to escalate." Because to them, escalation means not only winning the war, but also being able to take what you want. So, you have to get the other side to capitulate so that you can take. It can't be mutually agreed upon kind of situation. You have to dominate the other side so that they'll pay you something. The United States and Europe should be to continue providing assistance as well as ramping up on sanctions. More impact on the Russian economy would have an effect on likely bringing Putin to the table. Uh for those who are too dimwitted to understand the concept again uh send your dollar into Vinmo or uh PayPal or Cash App and we'll we'll bring you on, let you express yourself. I know, you know, from the the bleachers it it all seems so easy. Um, but you know, we'll let you go ahead and uh hop out of the bleachers and see what you can do. Absolutely. It'd be my my pleasure to host you. Um I think the fellow was not understanding uh what I was saying in terms of taking but that's okay. Not everyone will understand.
>> Russia has demonstrated that it cannot convert its enormous sacrifice into meaningful battlefield gains and it's ultimately a losing equation for Russia.
>> You just cannot trust these devils. I mean literally Russia is winning the war as they've gained more territory. No country has ever like or no leaders, world leaders have ever said we lost more people or we lost a lot of people. So based on the loss of human life, we did not win the war. If that was the case, the Russians didn't win World War II even though they basically were the first ones to really get after Germany. Uh and they made the greatest sacrifice in World War II. Extraordinary numbers of losses. So if that's the metric on did you win, did you lose, then for sure the Russians lost World War II, but that's never been the metric because there's the presumption that you're going to that human life is going to be sacrificed. It's just the feigned like uh pain that the world leaders have when none of them have their sons in the war. So like how much do they really care? They're fighting wars that are unnecessary. And that would be eight out of nine wars. Now, let's get into the meaty stuff right here. Here we go.
>> The world's deadliest nuclear weapon does not sit in an underground silo or inside the bay of a strategic bomber. Instead, it hides thousands of meters beneath the ocean in the dark alley of a nuclear submarine. That is what Russia is currently doing. Vladimir Putin has deployed his Navy strategic forces. All nuclear armed submarines are now in full combat mode. Basically, nearly 900 nuclear weapons have just gone live and they're lurking underwater, hidden from sight. What's even more concerning, these submarines can sail indefinitely. They don't even need to dock for refueling. Our next report tells you more. There's a popular >> I've actually talked about this technology before. It It's awesome technology in the sense that it causes awe. It's really remarkable. It It's sad and disturbing and you know when you really think about it there's obviously limitations. Yes, we know that they have dry packed powdered foods and foods that essentially don't expire and low-key are barely foods are really vitamin packs to keep the human being running. But obviously for water and food, the submarine probably is going to want to emerge at various points and also so that everyone doesn't go stir crazy aboard the vessel. It'll want to re reemerge, but theoretically it could just go on and on and on using the onboard nuclear power. Um, and that's really neat, but it's also quite sad when you consider the fact that the West, the whites, shall we say, have invested so much of their intelligence and financial resources in finding uh high-tech ways to take each other's lives. And it's to find such a dehumanizing experience that we want to put human beings into a metal tube and then sink the metal tube deep into the depths of the ocean and then like have it hang out there until we decide that we need to eliminate each other from Earth. I find it strange. But hey, that's not my nature.
>> Saying about Russia that Moscow has only two allies. The first is its battleh hardened army. The second is its silent and deadly navy. The Russian Navy ensures what is called a second strike.
>> This is what I was talking to you guys about earlier in terms of that second wave. And to me, this is really diabolical. The idea that you could have been wiped out in a nuclear attack and then still wanted to make sure that the enemy was dead. Even though your society and civilization is over, you're like, "Yeah, but I want theirs to be over, too." In in a world of perfect logic, it's irrelevant whether theirs ends as well. You're not around to see it, to benefit from it, hell, to even take credit from it. But just the idea that you're setting that up in advance, that's less something that has utility within the war uh that is being engaged in like when the war is being engaged in the fact that you have the second response which is usually only going to be activated after your civilization is eradicated. I mean, that's a crazy concept. Um, that is really a piece of leverage that's for the bluffing stage. That's a piece of leverage that you use to prevent war truly. Um, but once you're in war, that's not something that's really going to deter anyone's actions, frankly. That means if nuclear weapons are used against Russia, where every air base or missile silo is destroyed, there will always be a Russian submarine that'll be able to retaliate with a nuclear weapon. These submarines are part of the strategic fleet. Their purpose is to guarantee mutual nuclear destruction. And today, Russia has put it in >> That's what I said and that's actually what it is. It's the guaranteed mutual destruction which is the basically in other words uh in the language of the uh devils it is an insurance plan. Um yeah shout to Mr. Logan supporting the work using the stripe link now knowledge Mr. Lee writes given tribute for your intellect and perspective. Thank you. I appreciate you shout to the real ones acknowledge Jordan came in supporting the work using the stripe link. Looks like he emailed his question. He writes, "Peace of the Saints. Would it be off code for hitting and quitting black women who wear fake hair? Should these women be avoided altogether?" No. No. Uh, do what you do, but don't speak of it. Don't promote it. Um, but do what you do. This is something that is um a part of one of the lessons in the black hole, which talks about the necessity to multiply. You know, ideally, you don't multiply with these women. So, you know, maybe if you avoid them, but get like that, right? I one thing I can tell you is that I'm aware that my biology now is different than my biology at age 16. Um, so sometimes you need it in your life and if you're just out there catching bodies, it's better to catch their body than to do that to a nice young lady who's actually seeking a meaningful future with a man. Entire naval strategic fleet in combat mode. So what is this fleet that President Vladimir Putin has activated? Russia maintains the world's third largest navy. It has a total of 700 warships. These include corvettes.
>> Very impressive. And I would really appreciate if they would have maybe given a breakdown of the different nature of how uh the Russian Navy is organized or what they decided to invest more of their money into. And the reason that I say that is because like Iran for example has speedboats that they use which are clearly effective enough uh in addition you know in some instances where you think they would be using their navy uh they're actually using drones or using service their missiles and um frankly a lot of that is more costefficient and it preserves life. So knowing how uh Russia allocated its money uh to its navy is really important. We know that the third biggest spender which really they should be the second biggest spender. It should not be China. The only reason it's China is because China actually has the money. Uh but it really should be Russia because Russia has been um in a position of weakness to be overcome by the United States and that's always like top of their agenda. United States will speak about China but still continue to do business and like really not bat an eye. It's just all rhetoric.
>> Frigots, destroyers, and an aircraft carrier.
>> Well, these are all surface vessels. Russia.
>> So, they said an aircraft carrier as in one. That doesn't even come within shouting distance of what the United States is doing. And that's okay because uh different entities are organizing their strategy and thereby their personnel and their material in ways that are going to be effective for their specific strategy. So you can't say that this is wrong.
>> True power is in its submarines. In fact, most of its nuclearpowered warships operate underwater. And these submarines have just one task to launch a nuclear weapon if Russia is ever under nuclear attack.
>> The Russian Navy has around 60 nuclear capable submarines. The most dangerous are the Boret class. There are 15 in service. These are armed with submarine launched ballistic missiles and can deploy a nuclear weapon anywhere in the world. Each submarine carries 16 nuclear missiles that carry six re-entry vehicles. Basically, each submarine can deploy 96 nuclear warheads. Ain't >> that a be?
>> Then we have the newly inducted Yasenclass submarines. These do not carry ballistic missiles. Instead, they can launch hypersonic missiles like the Zirkon. Armed with a nuclear warhead, a single Yasenclass submarine can deploy a total of 32 hypersonic missiles. And then the third most lethal Russian submarines are the Oscar class. These can deploy 24 nuclear armed cruise missiles. But the Oscar class is designed for a special purpose to launch a weapon called the Poseidon.
>> Uhoh.
>> This is a nuclearpowered nuclear armed torpedo. It has an unlimited range which means the >> an unlimited range. This stuff is getting scary. Like truly awesome weapons. The Oscar submarine can launch the weapon while hiding in the Indian Ocean and have the Poseidon torpedo travel all the way till Greenland while remaining underwater throughout.
>> And each Oscar submarine carries six Poseidon torpedoes to protect the Boret Yasan and Oscarass submarines. Russia has three different types of submarines that act as aggressors. These are the nuclearpowered Aula.
>> So we don't want to get too deep into that right now. Um, I did have a document that I didn't finish fleshing out, but it it went through the details of how if Russia was to use a nuclear weapon, where would they use it? Like, so where would they target exactly? What type of uh weapon would it be? What would be the nature of the delivery system? How big would the warhead be? Um, and then when they choose where they deploy it, how does Russia make sure that they are safe so that they're not getting a blowback just merely from the wind of nuclear material? Um, so those are all things that I do want to address. Probably do it in a separate video. Uh, ladies and saints, it's been a pleasure to be here with you. Shout out to Eddie supporting the work. I appreciate you. Until next time, peace to the saints.