Transcription
Okay, greetings cowboys and cowgirls. What's up? How you doing? Are you doing the ether? This is like screaming out Satan in the middle of a church. When you're talking to modern academic scientists, you're not a scientist by definition and denotation; what they are is mathematicians. Ie, Adam is the most evil word; is the word ether.
Now, when it comes to Mother Nature, and of course Mother Nature is not a person, we're talking about natural natural Ran's right. Mother Nature doesn't give a crap if you call it zero-point energy, or the ether, or counter space, or a non-Cartesian inertia—the original definition of inertia, not the current connotation of inertia. The ether is absolutely undeniable.
Interesting a little experiment that you could do. I was trying to think, you know, like, like without having a bunch of equipment and so far as proving ether, what's the most simple way to prove the ether? Like you could have like a little bar bet, okay, but your buddies would actually have to look up the complex—are not that complex—equations for calculating magnetic field strength and its variants at distance; in other words, how far you get away from a magnet. All right, all right.
So now let's just say we were in outer space. A vacuum out of space is not a complete and total vacuum, but we don't even have the air to contend with—no oxygen and nitrogen molecules. So let's just say this experiment is done in outer space. We could do this on Earth, obviously. So all you need is a decently large magnet, like a two-inch by two-inch by one-inch. You can get those for 40 bucks; none neodymium-iron-boron in 50 Gauss is a block magnet. I got a pile of them; they're really dangerous; there's so much fun to experiment with. And like an old tube TV set, you know the type, just turn it to a black channel, or a white channel, or static channel. Okay, you could step the hell back up about 20 feet. But let's first start off by saying something here, speaking of magnetic field intensity, how it varies with distance. We're talking about like the maximum distance on that two-inch by two-inch by one-inch, as measuring in inches. Okay, in other words, how much influence we've got is about yay far, if you actually apply the calculation for magnetic field influence, okay, or strength at distance, we're talking about yay far, right? Okay, so that's the maximum distance which we have the ability to have a variance, like on a Gauss meter, of influence of static field. Now, an active field, of course, is in relationship to Maxwellian field equations, eh-eh-eh-eh, output over a given period of time and a known vector, of course. The output would be joules, watts, volts, so on and so forth. Maxwellian field equations, of course, never defined a field.
The interesting thing about the ether, however, and I'm going to get to the experiment very, very quickly here, is that modern physicists also admit to the ether; however, is the most lethal, evil word to them. They absolutely deny it outright with the Michelson-Morley experiment, and never denied the ether; it's completely absurd. Equation, I mean, see me equation, sees me experiment, absolutely as absurd as the Schrödinger's cat thought experiment—a completely baseless and groundless nonsense. But anyway, supposedly the Michelson-Morley experiment refuted the ether, but of course it did no such thing. But modern scientists actually, who cannot reconcile EPR—look up EPR if you like—or instantaneous action at a distance, they still admit to the ether, except they actually hide it in euphemisms; they call it quantum foam, or quantum fluid, or there's about six different things that modern quantum and the physicists actually refer to the ether without using the word ether, because the ether is literally the, the big evil Satan/devil word. And so you just don't say that stuff; you just don't like speak the word Satan, you know, in the middle of church, right? It's the same thing with the word ether; its connotations are literally that deep. And of course, there's been a thousand different philosophies and metaphysics on the ether dating back to the ancient Greeks and even further. But the ether is, of course, ever-present and undeniable.
Now, to the experiment. All you have to do is have a tube TV set, old tube TV set, and one of those little two-inch magnets, or even when larger than that. Now we know that given magnetic influence with distance, you've only got influence about that far; that's off a static field. All you actually have to do is sit there and wave that magnet, two inches or larger, at 20 feet plus. If you, if you actually have a little spotting scope at like, say, 30 feet plus, or even 40 feet, you can still see the influence; you can actually get back with a spotting scope, since you can't see that the TV set at 40 plus feet—not really fine detail, like I get my eye up against this computer screen—but 40, 50 feet back with a spotting scope, okay? You can wave that magnet just like this, and that you will actually see influence. Now, of course, the TV tube is nothing other than an electrostatic generator, okay, and something a vacuum tube striking an RGB array, depends on which type it is, like we just talked about an old tube Sony, or some old tube TV set, which you probably have one in your basement; most people have thrown them away. Now, if you ever want to like have a bet with somebody, say, let's just go off the known calculations for magnetic influence with distance; it falls off completely as probably measurable about yay far. I said, what if I could actually cause a magnetic influence and prove the ether? And if you're able to go into space and total vacuums, oh, and say, well, this is the influence of the magnets upon the air molecules, the oxygen and nitrogen, and it's transferring; that's not what's happening. But even if you're to go in a total vacuum out in space, oh, the tube TV set and you and your space suit, you would still see the exact same influence; you actually see it more because you'd have no influence of the dielectric permittivity and the magnetic permeability of the nitrogen and oxygen separating between you and the tube TV set. What this does, and you're actually, actually waving the magnet, is you're setting up a field perturbation and a strain in the hysteresis of the ether. Let me repeat that very succinctly, not using like gobbledygook words here: setting up a strain in the hysteresis and the spaces of the ether; no different than a little-bitty person. Well, what sort of influence does like a little child have in the middle of a pool? You know how much influence, because a little child's arms are about yay long, right? Right? How much of an influence could a child have in the middle of a pool flapping his arms? You know, of course, the water would be analogous to the ether. Well, quite a long way, if you actually had the hysteresis of the ether, in this case, the calm waters of a large Olympic-sized swimming pool, you know, a little child could flap his arms and create little waves against the edges of the pool, you know, fifty, hundred feet out, all right, even further. You can actually back up, of course you'd have to step outside of your house or put the TV sets down the end of the street. Okay, you can, as far as I've seen it, has been 80 plus feet. You have to have a little spotting scope or pair of binoculars, right? Sure you got a pair of binoculars? Put it down the street, okay? Take the binoculars up to your eyes, do this with the magnet, right? You will see the influence on that electrostatic and a dielectric electrostatic—same thing—projection on the phosphorous CO2 screen of that old tube TV set, you know, from 50, 60, 80 feet away. If you want to stick the TV set down in the street, your neighbors might look at you like you're a nutjob, but you know this runs contrary to what science says about the, the influence of distance of a given Gaussian flux magnet; it's both its volume and what it's rated at in, in a Gauss meter. That's nice. Okay, this magnet is, you know, point four Tesla, and it has a volume of, you know, 40 square centimeters. Actually, that's not the volume of a two by two by one inch. Point being is the ether does exist. I don't try to think of a really simple experiment and you could use to prove to people with a noun given math of magnetic field influence; this, of course, is not possible. But science doesn't admit to the ether, but the ether is everything; is the ether. Absolutely everything is the ether; is undeniable. Trying to deny the ether is like trying to enjoy in itself negation paradox, because subject perceives the object of negation. Denying the ether is absolutely ridiculous because Science itself has never defined a field. Maxwellian field equations, for example, only to find a field over a vector with a period of time with a given result. Next, well, in field equations never defied a field itself in itself, by itself. What is a field? Ancient Greek word, quarter. Ah, modern science has never defined a field; never. You will find no definition of a field anywhere. Go to Wikipedia, go anywhere, just find a definition of field. The answer for what a field is is very simplex; it's an ether perturbation which takes on four different modalities depending on you look at gravity, electricity, magnetism, dye-electricity. Of course, we're really only two fields; there's dielectric and magnetic, and ultimately that's reducible to one, because magnetism is the extrapolation of the dielectric field with the loss of inertia as manifests force in motion; centrifugal divergence, ie, force in motion. Of course, the dielectric is counter-spatial; magnetism is spatial. Whatever percent of the universe only has volume due to magnetism and magnetism only. The ether is an absolute; the ether is undeniable. Even the idiot scumbags of quantum mechanics believe in the ether, but they don't use the word ether; they call it quantum fluid. The, I can't remember the four other names that they use, but they still admit to the ether because you can't explain the universe with bumping particles; it's absolutely impossible. The only thing that can explain like light slowing down—of course, light doesn't move at all; it's a rate of induction—and speeding back up without breaking the law of conservation of energy after leaving glass or water is ether. Everything is capacitance, resistance, magnetic permeability, and dielectric permittivity. You can't explain these things with damn particles. The universe is not bumping particles; that's why I call quantum the cult of bumping particles. When you deny the ether, okay, and modern physics is only a theory, when you deny the ether then you must replace it with something else, and that's something that has been replaced with—it's not my opinion, this is what they say—is bumping particles; it's the cult of bumping particles. The only problem with that is is it's illogical; it's contradictory; it doesn't explain given phenomena; only the ether explains that; only the ether can explain not breaking the law of conservation of energy of light speeding back up and countless other phenomena; instantaneous action at a distance; electromagnetic retardation; that's what it's actually called, EMR, electromagnetic retardation. The universe is extremely simple, but it's not simplex, but the picture that's painted of cosmic mechanics by modern physics and quantum is illogical, absurd, and you know the brainchild of a bunch of atomistic insane fools. The ether is undeniable. I guess that's the end of this video. There's a lot more I'd like to say, but I've been so damn busy today; I got like ten thousand things to do, and it's already 12:00 midnight. I never have enough time to do everything that I want to do. Thank you and goodbye.