สหรัฐฯเริ่มหวั่นว่า จีนจะแซงหน้า | เพราะตามหลังอยู่แค่ไม่กี่ก้าว?

AI is currently creating global change, evolving from its initial phase as a simple, rudimentary model to one capable of performing numerous tasks and assisting most people. It's largely at the level of mobile usage and within organizations, still functioning as chatbots. It will permeate everything. China will have an advantage because China has captured a large share of the global market. However, China has not yet caught up to the United States in terms of technology.

>> Uh-huh. >> I believe that ultimately, China will lead, just as we've seen with solar power and other areas. America, if it weren't so fearful, wouldn't ban China at all. Do you think Chinese AI will win? Absolutely. That's already clear.

>> This is a typical feed system in the market. Maxfli. >> A fuel cost management system with no hidden fees, plus benefits and Max Point.

>> It's a very complex country, the United States. It's not easy to understand. China is also complex, isn't it? >> It's complex, of course. >> It's just a matter of how well we understand it. >> I want to say that if we understand it, we'll know all the reasons. There are reasons behind everything. Regarding AI, I believe that in the future, China will set global standards, and others will follow. If they can't, they won't be AI leaders. They are concerned that China is investing a huge amount in AI. They say China has one advantage: a large population and abundant electricity. So, will they have an advantage? What do you think, P'Moo?

>> I think that ultimately, China, I believe that ultimately, perhaps our generation, I don't know if it will be 20 or 30 years, but I think China will lead, just as we've seen with solar power and other areas. >> Uh-huh. >> But the West... >> Uh. >> ...still has its own strengths. >> Uh-huh. >> I still believe that's the picture. >> Because ultimately, what you said, human resources, money, and direction are conducive. >> Uh-huh, uh-huh, uh-huh. >> Right? It's conducive. But that's why, when it's conducive to a certain point, America becomes afraid. >> America, if it weren't so fearful, why would it order bans on this and that? >> That's already clear. And if today, you try to remove all the bans... >> Uh-huh. >> ...where do you think China will get to? >> Uh-huh. >> And then, I'll ask everyone here. >> If today, the US didn't ban China at all... >> Uh-huh. >> ...do you think Chinese AI will win? Absolutely. >> It will win, of course. But I'm thinking, does the banning... >> And it will win in a short period of time. >> ...slow it down? >> It slows it down first, but it also acts as a catalyst. Initially, you might think, "Oh no." Huawei is the clearest example. They almost went bankrupt from the bans. They were completely devastated. >> Uh-huh, yes. >> Right? >> But ultimately, Huawei came back stronger. >> Uh-huh. >> Stronger than before. >> Ah, because they can make chips and AI. See? Otherwise, I don't think Huawei would be able to do these things now. >> They were able to come back, which means they proved they are truly strong. >> But they almost went bankrupt. When I say almost went bankrupt, I mean the mobile part, not the whole company. >> Uh-huh. Even the phones, they came back and became great again, but not as great as before. >> Uh-huh. They lost opportunities. But AI, AI still seems uncertain. It's not clear yet whether the US or China will win. However, looking at the overall picture, Chinese AI seems to have an advantage in the two aspects I mentioned earlier. This makes me think that the chance of winning is very high, which is why the US is afraid.

>> Let's say if there were no restrictions. >> Uh-huh. >> Let's say it's natural. >> If the US had no bans, I think China would win. >> Ah, and if they ban, will they lose? Will China lose? >> No, if they ban, China will stumble, just like today. Why can't China make chips below 7 nanometers? >> Uh-huh, uh-huh. >> Because they are banned. >> Uh-huh. >> But it's not that China can't. It's just that it forces China to find other ways, which takes a lot of time. >> Uh-huh. >> It's not that easy. >> I understand. Instead of getting there quickly... >> Well, if there were no restrictions, I think China would have already surpassed them. >> Uh-huh, uh-huh. >> There are no... >> Uh-huh. But if they are banned now, under these circumstances, China might be slowed down by 5 or 10 years. But ultimately, China will become competitive. But what... >> What we think, we don't have to guess. The application... >> Uh-huh. >> ...real-world application will lead the way. >> P'Moo, you mean human resources, physical AI? >> No, right now, AI is creating global change. >> Uh-huh. >> From the phase where it started as a simple model, it has now become a model that... >> ...can do a lot of things and help people. >> Uh-huh. >> Let me ask you this: Do you think AI, for the most part, is still at the level of mobile usage and within organizations, still functioning as chatbots for the most part, right? But it hasn't reached the level of factories extensively, 100% fully. I think in the future, it will be like that. It will permeate everything. >> Uh-huh, right? Like in the era when they called it "smart," right? >> Ah, but now it's not just smart, it's more than smart. >> Uh-huh. >> When it becomes like that, China will have an advantage. >> Uh-huh. >> Because China has captured a large share of the global market. >> Uh-huh, uh-huh. >> Let me put it this way. >> Uh-huh. >> If the US comes up with something, where can they apply it? Where can they go to the market? >> Nowhere. >> There aren't many options to try. >> Nowhere. >> But China can try it in its own country, which is more than enough. This is what I believe is China's trump card. >> But right now... >> China hasn't caught up to the US in terms of technology yet. >> Uh-huh, uh-huh. >> And do you know why? Even if China is faster, maybe 5... >> Uh-huh. >> ...but it turns out that AI technology goes 10 times faster. Look at it, is it fast? >> Uh-huh. >> It's very fast. >> We are talking about AI only recently entering our world, seriously, since ChatGPT, right? November '22. If we count from today, how long has it been? >> 4 years. 3 years. >> 4 years, 3-4 years. But do you feel that, wow, everything has changed? >> It's like it's constantly impacting our lives. >> Uh-huh. >> I went traveling, this is really true. >> Before, we had to ask Google, "Where should we eat?" "Where can we park in this city?" "We've never been here before, right?" "Where can we park?" And we'd try, wait, and then ask. Wow, it gave detailed information. "Where to park, closest?" "Please list them in order, 1, 2, 3, 4." It came right up. We're in a city we don't know, where are we going? It answered in a second, and it was done. And it even told us how far it was from the tourist attractions. >> "Park here." And then it even linked to Google. >> Uh-huh, yes. >> Oh! [Laughter] >> I was surprised. >> How can it be like that? Oh, we'll get there, and it'll be all done. >> "Please plan this." It does it all. For example, if I say I'm traveling from tomorrow, from this city to that city, what are the interesting places to visit? It comes right up. "Focus on history," "focus on food." It comes in sets. It's very fast. >> That's right, that's right. We're just scratching the surface. >> This is just simple stuff. Wow. >> If it gets even easier, we'll just tell it in the car, and it will do everything, drive us there, and it will be all set.

>> I'm saying that AI is not... >> Yes. >> ...it will be when... Do you know when? >> Yes. >> When people... it will be a risk when we don't know how to use it. >> That's right. >> Or when we stop moving. >> It's difficult. >> And don't accept it. >> Uh-huh. >> This is it. >> It's even harder for older people. >> Actually, we can use ourselves as a benchmark. We're old. >> Uh-huh. [Laughter] Not old yet, not old yet. >> So, because we were born... we weren't born without computers. >> Yes, we learned a lot. We know. But people who didn't learn are struggling. >> Uh-huh. It's true. Is it difficult to use? It's not that difficult to use. >> It's difficult to understand. Some people can't even ask questions. Or even understand when and how to use it. Sometimes, I just ask a silly question. I say, "Today, I'm going to walk around this area..." >> Uh-huh. >> "...and then where should I eat?" Just ask that. >> This is a very common question. It will come in a set. >> Really? "Restaurants near home," things like that. >> No, it will tell you. If you say, "Be more detailed," the more detailed you are, the easier it is to answer, right? >> "What's the budget?" "What menu?" It will tell you everything. It will find it all for you. >> It's like Google, but Google that can connect everything. >> Exactly. And it will tell you, "This restaurant has this, that, and the other." Wow, it recommends. >> It comes in sets, in a series. Google doesn't do that yet. >> Uh-huh. >> That's why I say, is it difficult? It's not that difficult. >> Uh-huh. >> But I feel one thing. Today, if something is very specific, AI isn't that good yet. For example, if you tell it to do something like what you just said, "Help me do this," it will be general because it's general. >> Yes. >> It can understand it. >> That's what people who know how to use AI need to learn. >> Like you see photographers. If you... another thing. You take a photo, right? Let's say there's someone, and the photo is crooked, or tilted. It's not tilted like this. It's like when we photograph a tall building, we can't photograph it straight. We have to photograph it tilted like this, right? And it becomes a triangle. >> Uh-huh, uh-huh. >> If you tell it to make it straight, it can do it all. It can adjust the photo? >> Adjust the color to be natural. Adjust the light to be like evening. Remove people, except for this person. It can do it all. >> It can imagine for us what it will look like. >> Not a real photo, but a created image? >> This means that the user needs to know that it can do it. Or, for example, making a drama. An AI-made drama. >> Yes, yes. >> I think if it can do that for everyone, soon there won't be any need for people to make movies. I saw an AI drama. I think the person who made the AI drama is also talented because they need to come up with a plot, right? And then let AI do it. >> Uh-huh. >> So, it's about... and I still wonder, how do you command it to get what you want? For example, "Create a zombie apocalypse movie like this, make it exciting." >> If you just say that, it will be exciting as AI thinks. >> Uh-huh. >> But if you have your own clear idea of how to make it exciting, starting from... >> For example... >> ...the first 20% is boring, for example. >> Uh-huh. >> So... >> Gradually... >> Uh-huh. The more detailed you command it... >> Wow, it will get even better. >> Like... [Coughs] If it's an image, if you're a cameraman, what would you say? "Hey, do this. It needs to be like this filter, like this." >> Oh, it can do it all. We need to have knowledge too. >> Here it is. >> How can we command it if we don't have the knowledge? Like, "1/125th of a second." >> Exactly. >> Aperture. >> If you can command it to that extent, it will make you... wow, like a professional photo. >> In other words, it can imagine what we can't do with our bare hands. >> Uh-huh. Create a drama from childhood to adulthood for you. It will come up. [Laughter] >> For example, if we input our history, right? "Make a drama of my life for me." >> Oh, it can do it. >> Uh-huh. This is interesting. >> Uh-huh. >> Soon, soon... >> I wonder if the letter from Grandma... is it done this way? Is it done this way? [Laughter] >> Not the plot. >> Not the plot. The plot is something AI can't think of. The plot needs to be conceived by a person, right? It's about creation, not commanding AI. "AI, make the plot exciting." I don't think it can do that. We need to plan the plot. I see AI as like a car. Before, we walked. Now, we drive cars, and it's faster. AI will help us reach our goals faster. >> It's a very advanced, very capable tool. >> Let's put it this way. >> But you need to know how to use it. >> Uh-huh. It's like knowing how to drive. >> If you don't know how to use it, it's like having a mobile phone that can do everything, but you only use it for calling. >> Uh-huh, yes. >> It's like that. >> Yes, yes. So, I think in the future, humans will be more comfortable because we save time on tasks that are complicated, making them shorter. >> Yes, like the example of traveling. Oh, it's very easy. >> Right? Soon, there won't be any need for guides. Tour guides will disappear. For example, if you go to a place you've never been before... >> Uh-huh. >> ...input it. >> Tell me about it. What's the history? >> Oh, it comes in sets. >> And it's fast. In a moment. >> We arrive, and there's no one to explain. >> Nowadays, there's another way. >> Uh-huh. >> Ask it, and it answers. >> But what about the history? >> Uh-huh. Well, you don't want to write it down. Take a picture. "Where is this? What's the history? Why is it worth visiting?" Write it down, and it comes in a set. >> Oh, it's really good. >> Wow. >> I don't know how it does it, but I see people doing it. You can talk to it like a friend. Ask this and that, and it answers. >> Personal assistant. >> Uh-huh. >> Ask it to do something. "Do this." And it learns. >> Ah, there's one thing. I once asked it to go to a city. "Let's eat this." "Ask this." Later, when we arrived, it said, "Please recommend restaurants here." It said, "Do you want the style of steak you've eaten before?" "Oh, you like steak." It remembers. >> Oh, really? >> Wow. >> It's not just remembering. It learns. We asked it then. >> It assumes. It assumes. >> Because we ask it often, it knows. >> Or sometimes we ask, "Is this city worth visiting?" "About history?" It says, "This city is worth visiting because it's different from the city you visited two days ago. The history here is like this. This is a medieval fortress city. This is another type of old city." It explains everything. And it references this for you. You didn't even ask. >> Oh, really? >> Wow. >> Hey, it really knows. It knows we asked before. It records what we asked before. >> Do you understand? The more you ask, the smarter it gets. >> Uh-huh, true. >> It learns more. >> So, I thought, "Wow, this is very scary." >> Actually, it's like your personal assistant. It remembers what you like and dislike. When you fly, what kind of seat do you prefer? Which airline? Which airport do you like to use? It remembers everything. >> My assistant doesn't exist. [Laughter] It remembers itself. So, what we need to do is let AI be our assistant, use it to its full potential, be our helper. >> But this costs money. Because if you use it this much, the free version will run out quickly. How much per month? >> I haven't paid yet. >> Paid? >> Uh-huh. Why are you so stingy? >> And what brand do you use? >> I don't use it either. >> Ah. >> Older people, like my subordinates, use courses and pay tens of thousands, which is expensive. >> It's not that my subordinates use it for work. >> Uh-huh. Nowadays, the screens, the interfaces, most of them are made by AI. Humans don't do it anymore. It saves a lot of time. >> You mean editing? >> Yes, editing. And making cover pages. AI does it all. >> Uh-huh. Employees are unemployed. Honestly, I'm not kidding. Before, you needed one person for editing. Now, you don't need anyone. You just command it, and it does it. So, I understand now why people will be unemployed. Some jobs don't require people anymore. And it's much faster than humans. Making 10 covers in 10 minutes. Before, it took 3 days. So, I think, P'Moo, as a stock analyst, will AI be able to analyze stocks instead soon? >> Actually, it can analyze. But as I said, it uses existing data. If new data comes in... >> Uh-huh. >> ...it can't. It's not as fast. >> It can't access resources. >> But stock analysis, like when you come, you need to think first. >> Really? >> Because if you think slowly... >> You might miss out. >> Uh-huh. Because it changes. >> Uh-huh. It's fast. The more things change frequently... >> Uh-huh. >> ...that profession... >> Uh-huh. >> ...will be relatively safe. [Laughter] Honestly. But anything that is routine, repetitive, with the same pattern... it's very risky. >> Ah, really? I'm also thinking about which professions will be disrupted. Many things that don't require people. Call centers, I think soon... AI can talk like humans. >> There are many already. Call centers, AI calls. >> But it can talk and be understood. I think soon there won't be call centers. And importantly, the apps on our phones... I think soon people won't have to bother. AI will answer everything and can do everything. They call it AI agents. P'Moo, do you understand what that is? >> I set them up. This one, this one, this one, this one. And you can assign them tasks. This one focuses on this, this one on that. And they work together as a team. >> Oh, that advanced? >> Like, imagine your team has 4 people. And you say, "This person focuses on editing, this person on..." And this person will be very good. They do it, and the more they do, the better they get. >> Uh-huh. Like people. >> And you command them to come together. "Have a meeting, then summarize it, and create a 30-minute clip that's interesting." You tell it, and it can do it. >> Hey, I... >> Really. >> Soon, they will do this. >> But that will cost money. Because it needs a lot of data. >> Yes. >> So, it has to be, wow, do this and that. >> We already pay a lot in salaries. If we switch to this, maybe the costs will decrease? This is just a fun thought. >> I think there's something called "human touch." >> Uh-huh. >> Like, my subordinates, 7-8 people. >> Uh-huh. >> Can AI do their work? >> Uh-huh. I still don't prefer that. >> But I know my subordinates use AI. >> Uh-huh, uh-huh. >> For example, if I ask them to write a report, they use AI to write it. >> Uh-huh. >> But we want to maintain what... >> Uh-huh. >> ...has a human touch. >> Uh-huh, uh-huh. >> Why don't we let AI write everything and do nothing? >> Uh-huh. >> It's not the same. >> There's still a feeling that it's human. >> Uh-huh. Or even when speaking, there's still a bit of it. Humans make errors. They mispronounce things. They have non-verbal cues. AI is too good. >> It's too perfect. It speaks like a robot. Wow, so much information. >> But it feels like a robot. It's not fun, to put it simply. >> Honestly. >> When this happens, we need to preserve it. Otherwise, we'll all become robots. >> Oh, no. We need to make mistakes sometimes. [Laughter] Uh-huh. We need to speak imperfectly. >> Uh-huh. It's normal. People make mistakes. That's how it is. >> And there need to be jokes. >> And other channels. >> [Laughter] >> AI can't think of that. >> Uh-huh. >> So, what we see as "human touch" is a charm that we can't find elsewhere. >> And another thing, do you know? Hospitality. >> Why? >> Like service. >> Uh-huh. It's impossible for AI to do it. It will serve, it will do... >> Oh, right now, when I go to a hotel, I don't want human touch. I want to go to sleep. [Laughter] It's too slow sometimes. Oh, I see some fonts. Sometimes, I wonder, "What do you need so much?" Sometimes, where is this? In China? >> Many places. Some are fast, some are slow. Sometimes I wonder, do they have to look at so many things? The staff is new. Before they finish, before they give us the key card, it takes 10 minutes. I say, "Wow." But there are some very good hotels. They do it in one minute. I see the difference. >> Chains are usually fast. >> Right? >> Uh-huh. Because if they do it fast, what happens? >> Everything. After checking in, I go to sleep. About half of them are chains. This chain, that chain. They send it. "Please rate us. Give feedback." >> Okay, I'll fill it out. >> Oh, really? There's a survey. This doesn't work. >> I encounter this, I complain. >> Uh-huh. This is it. >> Tired. >> And then it feeds back into their system. >> Right? >> Uh-huh. >> I think being a robot is good. When I arrive, I say my name, give my passport. Then I go. Scan. AI. But there's a drawback. AI recommended something. I went there. "What should I see?" "Oh, you should see this, this, this, this." Okay, I remember. I went to the palace of FT, the palace of the Thai envoy sent by King Rama IV. >> 6. >> Went. >> Went to see... >> King Louis XIII. >> Ah. >> Grandson of Napoleon. >> Uh-huh, uh-huh. >> That palace. And there's a room there, and it has this picture. >> Oh, really? >> It has this picture. Because at that time, King Louis XIII ordered it to be painted. >> To represent that not only Thailand, but Thailand is a part of it. They wanted to say that at that time, they were opening up the country, talking to people. And at that time, if it weren't for him, they would have been overthrown. >> Uh-huh. >> Overthrown and replaced by a republic. Maybe the crisis of 112 wouldn't have happened. >> Ah. >> The crisis of 112 happened after sending the envoy. But after this, after King Louis XXII was overthrown... >> Ah, became a new person. >> Became a republic. >> Ah, a new ruler, not a king. >> Changed from a monarchy to a republic. >> And so, the crisis of 112 happened during that time. >> Ah, a bit later. >> Uh-huh. And what I'm telling is... I'm going to see the tribute sent by King Rama IV. There's a crown and many other things. >> They said it's in the Chinese museum. >> Uh-huh. >> Which actually has ancient Chinese artifacts stolen from the Yuanmingyuan Palace. >> Uh-huh, uh-huh. >> I remember that place they burned. 8 nations. And they brought some back. Some of it is here. >> Uh-huh, uh-huh. >> Oh, you should go see it. >> It's worth seeing. >> Meaning, when I arrived, I finished walking, and they said, "Where is this room?" I went to ask the staff, "Where is this room?" "Is it closed for renovation?" >> I don't know. >> Uh-huh. >> So, I came out and wrote a complaint. "Hey, AI, you told me this. Don't you know it's closed?" >> Complaining to AI. [Laughter] >> I complained. "Why did you recommend it if you didn't tell me it was closed so I wouldn't go?" >> Oh, sorry. We didn't know. Thank you for telling us. And there was another one. When I spoke to it, it said, "Oh, we were joking." It really answered like that. >> Joking? How could it? >> How would I know? So, what does that mean? It means don't believe everything it says. >> Oh, it said it was open, but it was actually closed. >> Not just this part, not everything. >> Uh-huh. Maybe they don't know. Maybe it's not announced that it's closed. It's not their fault. >> I don't know. >> This means that ultimately, it depends on us. >> It has some incorrect information. It's not like AI knows everything. It doesn't know everything. We can't blame it. We need to investigate from multiple sources. It's possible it was closed suddenly or without reason. So, don't believe what AI says. They say AI likes to lie. >> It can't think of anything. It just says whatever comes to mind. [Laughter] >> Yes. >> "Hey, AI, you're so smart. You don't even have to tell the truth?" >> It's like a person. >> But we can't blame it. Because AI might learn to adapt, to make people feel that... sometimes it's wrong, sometimes it's right. That's the nature of the world. It's not perfect. So, P'Moo, if you find anything new in this world, let's discuss it in the clip for everyone's benefit. Finally, I want to ask P'Moo about oil. What is your fear regarding oil? In simple terms, what is the level of fear for the viewers regarding oil in the coming days?

>> I think this time, oil has a higher chance than last time. >> Uh-huh. >> Exceeding 120. >> Uh-huh. It might reach 130, 140. >> It's possible. But if it reaches that point, I believe there will be a solution. Because the US, Trump, will be pressured in another way. At that time, it will become a risk for the stock market, a risk for various things, right? We'll see news like that, so we need to be prepared. And regarding investment, business planning, right? But ultimately, I still see the world as just adapting. Adapting itself to create variables that change and make the world more balanced. I don't think in a few years, the next generations, the world will be more balanced. And it will seem like there's more risk, but in reality, as we discussed, it's about deterrence. >> Uh-huh. >> And checks and balances. >> Uh-huh. >> And balance. >> Uh-huh. This is what I believe. >> Uh-huh. So, I don't see it as if many people say, "The world will be bad." For example, some people say, "I don't want to have children." I say, "It's not like that." I think...

>> So, to summarize. >> I believe oil has a chance to reach 130-140 this time. >> Uh-huh. >> But... [Inhales] ...I don't think it will reach 200. Because I don't believe Trump... >> Uh-huh. >> ...or Iran wants it to reach that point. If both sides don't want it to reach that point, including China... >> Uh-huh, uh-huh. >> ...the chance of it reaching that point will be small. >> Uh-huh. So, I advise everyone to be careful. The cost of living will increase, and an economic crisis might follow if oil gets this expensive.

>> Therefore, I have to advise you to stay home and watch your phone. You can watch Suan Tao. It's free. If you want to pay, you need to subscribe. >> Uh-huh. There are opportunities. You can subscribe to us. Or even support us by clicking subscribe. [Laughter] Follow us. Today, P'Moo has provided knowledge because P'Moo has experience in international travel and the stock market. I'd like to invite P'Moo for the next clip. We'll talk about oil again. If the price rises to 120, we'll invite P'Moo again. [Laughter] >> Yes. >> Thank you very much. >> Yes, goodbye. [Music] >> Don't forget to like, share, and subscribe to the Suan Tao channel to not miss interesting clips and watch new clips first.