📱

Get Our Mobile App

Take your business learning on the go!

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

THE REAL REASON THE DEMS CAVED

Darren Monroe Politics20:59

Transcription

The real reasons the Dems caved. Listen to the end. You, you, it's going to be almost unbelievable, but this is what I'm hearing out of DC. Okay, so listen very carefully. I'm going to build this in.

First of all, we know Schumer has something to do with this. All of the people who are doing this, ironically, did we're not up for election next year, right? On top of that, the Dirty Eight. The 38 were not up for election next year. On top of that, some of which, two of which, one of which was my senator, Dick Durban, is retiring. There are two retiring out of the eight, and the other six aren't even up for reelection. So since we know that in in 2026, so we know that.

But why would they do that? Why would they do this specific deal the way that they did this specific deal? Well, something very clearly is going on because I've been screaming. If you look at my videos, I've been screaming for Schumer to go away for some time now. But on top of that, what doesn't make sense is that all of these people, not all of them, but some of them are the same people who were voting in the previous shutdown. There's something going on where they're breaking away. Either Schumer's lost control or Schumer is the architect behind this. And a lot of people believe he's the architect behind this.

But why did the Dems really care? Why would they do that? What's the advantage when we had the advantage? Why would they do that? Why would they go that way? You ready for this? This is what I'm hearing. Basically, the reason they caved comes down to their approach for the 2026 election. And that's why they think Schumer's behind this architect-wise. Follow with me here. So what happens with the Dems caving, with with them caving? First of all, uh, Trump don't want still want to give those SNAP benefits away. Okay, so there's still a fight to get SNAP benefits, even though it was an agreement in the Senate to do the SNAP benefits. But the question becomes, if is it going to go down in the House? I tell you what's not going down in the House. They, and he's already said it. Mike Johnson's already said he's not going to agree to have a vote on those subsidies in December. They gave it up for nothing. But did they?

Here's where I'm going with this. The reason these eight Dems caved, according to what I'm hearing out of DC, is because they wanted this to happen. Meaning, here's the thing. If Schumer's the architect, if Schumer's the architect, if Schumer's the architect, it makes sense because he gets millions of dollars from billionaires in New York. They had documentaries for the last 20 years on that. So, I, I, that's, that's unbelievable. That's unbelievable.

But what's really disturbing is that I'm hearing that several of these Dems, decay, maybe even my my senator, Dick Durban, they think that it will put more push than we already have for 2026. If millions of Americans end up without healthcare, it will be a guaranteed win in the electoral vote in 2026. We already had a pretty good shot. I mean, there's a tsunami coming already. And as long as Trump keeps opening his mouth every day and getting on social media, it gets better and better. But what these people are thinking, let's really tip the scales. Yes, I kid you not. Let me know your thoughts in the comments. They're thinking if we tip the scale, if we tip the scale by making sure we make this deal, 'cause we know the Republicans are going to lie, then 20 million Americans will have their subsidies go up that more than double. And out of those 20 million, 4 million of them, I know this sounds cruel, seriously, this is what I'm hearing on the inside, 4 million of them could decide not to have the healthcare. And that every year they don't have that healthcare, 50,000 of them will die slowly or quickly. Let that sink in because I got something to say about this that you should hear if you've listened this far. Thank you. I want you to burn to etch in your head. Write it somewhere. Whether it be on your phone, your refrigerator, somewhere, remember these eight people and the other 10 people, some of which are part of that eight from the first shutdown.

I have said throughout my channel, if you're new to me, that this is now we're dealing with, we're dealing with a um, a civil war going on with the Democratic party in roughly three to four ways. And the first one is the progressives versus traditionalists. All of the people, they're not moderate Democrats. These, this is some traditionalist thinking. You know, the people who are standard. They're not thinking about the people. They're thinking about numbers. And in this case, they're looking at numbers. Either money they're getting paid money or the numbers to push the scale in 2026. I'm telling you, that's what they thought.

Hey. Hey. And I was like, "Wait a minute. That's cruel as fuck." Because you mean to tell me that 4 million people go without health insurance in 2026 'cause the Republicans ain't holding that [ __ ] up. And you mean to tell me 50,000 people got to die? 50,000? And I didn't believe it at first. I was like, "No, no, no." And they broke it down to me. I listen and other people are hearing this, too. It's coming through, but it's almost unbelievable, isn't it, that people would be willing to let 50,000 people per year die? Now Bernie Sanders talks about this 50,000 per year who don't have healthcare who would die slowly or quickly. And these numbers would push Democrats all the way over to control House and Senate and they can start doing all sorts of things, even impeaching Trump if they want to, or they can, you know, really change a lot of things down before you even get to 2028. But 50,000 people got to die because of that every year.

They're pushing it all the way over instead of think about what I'm saying here. Instead of having 40 days, 60 days, 90 days, 100 plus days to hold out with the Republicans, they capitulated in hopes that the Republicans screw them over so that they can screw them back over the next 10 years because basically in 2026 it would be a big change and in 2028 would just add on to 2026, a blue wave for '26 and '28 would mean that they would be or Democrats would have power and be able to do this for a very, very, very long time. And it's not by coincidence that these decisions were made by Democrats who have nothing, nothing to lose because they're not on the chopping block. There's some strange [ __ ] going on.

And I got to tell you right now, my thoughts on this come down to this. And I want y'all to listen very carefully to me. When 2026 and 2028 roll around, y'all remember these names. Y'all remember these people. Have them etched into your head. Come time to vote if any of these are your people.

But here's another thing because this was a powerful word that Ezra talked about, one of the co-founders, Eli and Ezra of um of indivisible.org, or but Ezra talked about this one core thing. He said, you don't, you don't begin to to win with democracy in elections, you win in primaries. Now everybody's talking about 2026, okay? But what about these primaries? What about these primaries come up? Because several of these people need to be primary, like a [ __ ] they do. But it becomes another hard thing that's up and most people don't talk about. A lot of people say, "Well, we need another party." You're up against two billion dollar institutions, the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. And one thing they have in common, one thing they'll fight together is that you don't have another party. Just like there's only one NFL. You know, Ice Cube started his own form of football league and they fought him. They did everything they could to hate on him to keep him away. There have been people in the past who started their own baseball leagues and done what they could. Basketball leagues, same thing. Okay. In fact, forgive me, Ice Cube's was a basketball league and the NBA's been fighting them. I think it was. I, I'm getting it confused whether it's football, basketball, but all three of those major sports are fighting to make sure there's nobody else in the game. There's room over there for that game, too, because a lot of those guys are are trying to do pay-per-view for every damn thing to watch every sport, which is crazy.

But I, I want to share with you the importance here, the primary of these people. We got to kick out the traditionalists. We got to kick them out. We got to banish these [ __ ]. They got to be done. They got to be done. Enough is enough of this [ __ ], don't you think? I mean, it's not just, and I've been saying this, if you're new here, you definitely want to subscribe. Here's the deal. I've been saying this for the last 11 months that the problem we have is not necessarily right. It's left. We got a big left problem. These people are turning against us because they're for their own interest. I mean, we always talk about Congress for their own interest, but in this case, they are for their own [ __ ] interest. And each one of those, here's another thing they all have in common. All eight of these people are millionaires. Some mega-millionaires, but all eight millionaires. They'll be all right. But these people dying won't be.

And I'm sure, you know, because somebody's already gone to their people to ask them about it. and then they go to him and they're trying to make sure this doesn't get out to what I'm saying because you know we're going to let Americans die. Oh no, we didn't mean that. That's not why we voted. But if you notice in all the interviews that happened in the last 24 hours, everybody is not giving a clear answer on what the f happened. Nobody.

What I want you to understand is that the thing you can do is if any of these eight are in your area, there's two things to remember. One, are they running again? Who's running against them? So you can look and see if they're more progressive. There's got to be some progressive people and we got to start helping them right now. Especially if it's 2020 and what all of these people are 2028 who's running again. Um, I think um, there's two retiring, including Senator Durban, but I forget what if Durban is '26 or '28. I think it's '28. Um, but here's the thing I'm going to say about this. Let's say they're retiring. Who's trying to come in? Are they progressive? Let me give you an example. JB Pritzker, our governor, has endorsed a, I think a lady for uh Dick Durban's seat. But my concern is, is she progressive? I love, I love my governor. He's a good man. But [ __ ] what he's saying. What is going on progressively with this person? Are we replacing a Durban with a Durban? Or are we getting somebody new in there? We need some Montami type [ __ ] Mami type mother. We need somebody up in there who's ready to stand up and stay on business and go further left instead of being this centrist moderate [ __ ] because that's where the traditionalists are. Centrist moderate. Okay. I think Kla's a lot more left than people think growing up like she did. She grew up with straight up, you know, hippies, you know, educators, hippies, intellectuals who who met at a movement. You know what I mean? I think she's more open to that. But she tried to fe she had seven days, y'all. She had 107 days.

But I tell you this, I tell you this, y'all better get y'all better get ready because we getting ready to have not just a tsunami on the red. We need to have a tsunami in the left. We need to watch out, clear out all of these traditionalist [ __ ] who are out for self, who cave in like this. None of them need to be senators nor any traditionalists who are on in the House. Though, I got to give you one, I got to give Jeff one thing. I got to give Jeff one thing. I don't like Jeff. I think he, he, he should be replaced just as much as Schumer. I've done videos on my channel about it. But I got to give the man one thing. In both shutdowns, he he stood tall and held all his people together. And he had a lot more people. So, what does that say about Schumer's leadership? It's time to retire. They need to fire Chuck Schumer. They need to fire Chuck Schumer. He needs to go. He needs. Bye-bye. He needs to go. No more Chuck Schumer. He go bye-bye. Enough is enough.

You know, we've come to this world now where the Senate, and that's the problem I have right now. you know, whether it be Cy Booker or Elizabeth Warren or whoever, they, they take a lot of [ __ ] man. Seriously. And what I, I'm not talking about from us. I'm talking about they watched their leader, their minority leader, vote against them in that first shutdown. And that should have been a challenge of Schumer's position right there. But nobody had the heart to do it. Nobody had the heart. And what I'm saying is we need leadership obviously in Congress now in the governors. Leadership is there. They are holding strong together. No doubt they have fought and saved us billions of dollars. They have stood up on business for for last 40. We're going into 42nd week. Okay. They have. I've watched them. I got the proof. I share a lot of proof in there in my clarity group, which is in the description and in the homepage. Uh, look at it whenever. Here's the thing. It's on sale right now, too.

I don't want you to understand this group, this this excuse me, this group of people, the Senate, they, man, let me tell you, they are not, nor the House really, at a point of leadership. Individually, they do well as a leader. As a unit of leadership and unity, they cave. But the governors have not. The governors have been on point, y'all. The governors have been standing strong from go. They've been ready for this fight for two, two years ago. They were prepping the governors and attorney generals. They've been fighting 20 plus governors and attorney general. And the good news is we now have uh two more governors in there, which is, you know, Virginia and North uh New Jersey. And what I'm trying to tell people is this is a fight. We're in a major battle. And what I'm trying to tell people is that our biggest challenge right now that we're up against is ourselves. We cannot let these people, we cannot forget this. And we got to fight within instead of just saying, "Oh, I don't trust the Dems." No, no. Don't trust the traditionalist Dems. Let me be very specific. It's the traditionalist Dems that are the problem. AOC ain't the problem. Jasmine Crockett ain't the problem. Several you, several other Dems, I mean, you know, on the Senate side aren't the problem. It's this specific type of Dem that we need to primary out or make sure that whoever comes in and replaces him because Dick Durban is coming in, are they traditionalists or are they progressives? That's what we need to do.

Get with indivisible.org. Sign up to indivisible.org, y'all. They're a great organization. When I was working Kamala Harris's campaign last year, um after after we lost 'cause the, you know, what was stolen, that's all I'll say 'cause YouTube capitulates. They don't want to say nothing. Last year they recommended them to me. So I went over there and just get on the email list and listen to them. They're on point and they got the grassroots organization. They need to be better at marketing, but you know, online, but they got the grassroots organization and their heart's in a good place. And they have been pointing out a lot of great things like this. Also, they're going to help you clarify who to be going for, you know, who should be who should be on your side. They're independent, but who should, who should, you know, who's on your side as a progressive? We got to get progressive. We got to go more left. Everybody, you know, whether it be Montani type left or Bernie type left, I don't know. But the idea, we got to go more left. We got to get away from this. And the only way we're going to do this is start cleaning you cleaning out the primaries just as much as we do in the in the in in the main election. That's what it comes down to.

Because these Dems, they caved in hopes that our that our people, our 20 million, millions of which would lose their healthcare and go under. Nobody wants to believe that. I don't want to believe that. But it makes sense. It does. And given the sources I'm hearing it from, it makes sense. And Schumer's behind this. It's a cold, calculated move. While we calling them punk asses, they're doing some cold, calculated [ __ ]. But it would have been better for them to have the shutdown and held the line because it was really rallying our base and we were in a position to win. But when you have traditionalists, they go on their own plan. They ain't with the team. They on their own agenda. That's a problem. That's a big problem. We're going to get through this. I said months ago, it's going to get worse before it gets better. All right. Have I earned your subscription? Let me know. Otherwise, check out the next video. We'll make it through this.