Palestine Update 68 - 15062025

15th of June 2025 Palestine updates 68. Go for it, professor. Yeah. Yeah. I think everyone, everyone is aware what was has happened, um, in the recent couple of days—almost three days now. First Friday, Saturday, Sunday—not even, not even full three days; two and a half days. Um, just quick recap what has happened itself.

Obviously, um, the, the plot for, for this action from Israel and America—that's clearly arranged with America, correctly and exactly—fully, fully arranged, fully agreed details, work together. And someone told me that he has information from inside channels—he, he has deep channels there, business channels and so on—is that the supreme commander of the Israeli army is a four-star general, the American four-star general; that's the one who's there in command. And I guess it's Kola, the, the syn comm commander, he's there, the, the one in command, ultimate command; all the other, the one and so on is just, just front, but individual of that. We know that it's, it's really and part of the American army stock with, with Israel and so on. Um, they knew that, and the whole process of it seems to be then they—that was decided even few days after Trump took office—maybe even before that—was really before, after it could be before, because already was elected and nothing would prevent him from getting there except being assassinated. That's so it was arranged before that.

And the reason we made the ceasefire—so putting a nice face and with the understanding with the ceasefire—I, I appear to be fulfilling my promises and election and so give a nice face and then in your course you break it as agreed upon—is agreed upon, always agreed upon. Don't believe all this focus, focuses, and then you continue hammering. I will come and suggest the Riviera issue and all these things and see if we can get the Palestinians kicked out to Egypt. And, uh, most likely that will work because CC is just a shoe in our, in our foot. But the problem was with agent to take into consideration that the, the regime in Egypt is, is a few, is a military feudal regime. So there are few feudal laws. It's only one—not one king—is not a king. This is not a king. He is an one of the warlords; the bigger one maybe, but not the only one. There are at least 20, 30 major generals and left generals, and they control certain parts of the economy and the army. These 20, 30 guys control about 60% of the Egyptian economy, which is massive; it's not—we understand Egypt is a big country now, over 100 million people with an island and blessing and all this—is massive; it's massive considerability. And they seem to be—they regard the accepting the Palestinians in Egypt as, as a matter of life-threatening for the regime at least, or for Egypt. Maybe some of them are nationalistic, maybe or patriotic in whatever confused senses, maybe, maybe one or two having Islamic inclination. If you have 30 people, you can't expect that one or two somehow anyway to be—they say there's no way we are going to allow the Palestinians to be kicked out. That's the reason CC suggested quite early the best thing for—is that was not publicly said—"Listen, kick them to the negative desert, finish, and then get them back to"—that's the best solution. Getting them in Egypt is not possible. I cannot enforce it on the guys here.

But the Israelis are usually arrogant, and someone—they think they will be able to get the, the problems resolved once for all, and they continued with what they're doing, and then was back and forth, forth and back as we have seen, and then started then the issue with the, with the, with the nuclear, uh, with, with the nuclear enrichment etcetera, back and forth and so on, quite recently, maybe in the last two months and so on. This all—well designed. Why is, is, is done this way? Because the Americans and the Israelis recognized that the heavy weights in the—let's say when we say Iran or the Islamic Republic, or, or whatever we say—the regime in Iran, or the ruling elite—let's say the ruling elite—is not a homogeneous value; there are various wings; there are two major wings—the remainder or the remnants of the revolution, which is well structured as, as the revolutionary guard IRG, and the remnants of the Baha'i regime, which had various faction, factions, and these contains various types. Luckily they are not one block; otherwise they would have been able—they could have been able to unseat the regime and turn it into secular Arian Majist republic or something like that. They could not because they are split. Some of them are—sorry, my sister—who believe in the Persian Empire of time past. They live in the past. They live 2,000 years ago, and they think they can retain that past. It will not return. Let me assure you that it will never return. It's gone and never going to come back. The same like some people in Italy now—they think it can retain the Roman Empire. It has gone. It will never come back. It has been substituted by the European power, by America. That's your Roman Empire. Roman Empire in Rome and in Italy is not possible. It's gone and forgotten. Forget about Israel—is that is the historic function and is gone, destroyed. Will never to come back the same there. But some people live in a dream world because the, the vision of the reality is not the correct vision. The correct vision will discuss, interfere. There's only one divine sovereign, and you have to enslave yourself for him. That's the correct vision. Any other vision will get you scattered and confused—is not knowing where you belong, belong anywhere or there's any direction to go. But that's—we're not going too much in philosophy—so that's this, this wing or this block of the—is called the remnants of the Baha'i, and then we have some Baha'i who are enemies of Muslims anyway. They believe that they are the correct religion—that's acceptable for Persian and Arian nationalist because they regard that as a Persian religion, homegrown—is not from, not from the Arabs. And then we have some extreme Shia who believe that the Mullah regime is wrong because they have to wait for the one in this, in, in the tunnel when he comes. Nobody should do anything until he comes. And we have various factions—is a mishmash—and that weaken them a little bit luckily.

But the Americans, who is, are watching that and through the events, through history, they notice that the, the regime in general, especially the Bahai wing, the revolutionary wing—what's remaining is essentially the revolutionary guard, and maybe who is wavering is not having the courage or revolutionary spirit and understanding there should be—but they're trying to compromise between the—This one is a military organization, not a political organization. So they don't think in political terms. They are used to receive commands and execute commands, unless they become revolutionary and make a cod. Before that, most likely they will not do very much. So the policy was usually done by the other wing, cautiously, obviously not to excite any attention. And this full—they have full, full membership of Kafir and Zaidian and Baha'i and so on, and misguided Shia, all there—so al liberal Shia and so non-pring—all of this is there, and they could agree with some general things. What they agree generally is that we have to protect Iran from any attack, especially after the complex, after the attack of Saddam—they succeeded in—or the attack of Saddam succeeded to make the Iranian fear their neighbors and they will be attacked at home. So they will got obsessed with the idea—we should protect ourselves by having strategic alliance outside; we should have protection in Iraq, in Syria, so that if anyone attacks us they have to attack these first. So this is the wrong way understanding how you protect yourself. That's the first error. Show you that the vision of the reality is the wrong one. That's not the way reality has to be perceived. So, and that led them to commit blunder after blunder. They may be sincerely wanting to save Iran and get it developed and so on, but they are willing to be pushed back, pushed back, pushed back. They are not willing to fight yet. They think maybe we need a century to be able to fight and convert somebody. Maybe some of it—somebody say—"No need to convert anybody. Why convert anybody? We can be peaceful of everybody else. We are Arian. We're the cousins of the Germans and the North European. And if we get rid of the Maladi system of the Moolas and so on, then we can be secular. We be like the European. And if you have a fair share of Baha'i and other monafric and Kafir, then we are like America and Britain. So be integrated with them." That's the mindset—is not necessarily articulated like that in details, but that's what generally goes around in the atmosphere because nobody is structuring that clearly. The only one who's structuring things in detail are really the revolutionary wing and the like the secular part—they don't structure like that. Yes, there is the son of Muhammad, but this is just a puppet of the west who issue communicates and so on, and but clearly the communication—"We have to get rid of Islam. We have to go back to our roots 2,500 years ago. We have to have nothing to do with Islam. We are a nation. We are Arian," and things like that essentially. But what he's articulating is only four, five lines which, which the others also are believe in. But do you not give a program for real estate and society, and what he wants really is to come and have a throne, and that's all, and enjoy the throne. That's all what he wants. There's really no, no deep conviction about that. Now that's the only way he can come and become a king, and he is promised by the Americans—"We will put you as a king if we can"—to reg. That is working that direction. It's just a bubble—is a sellout anyway—but the all their action is based on that—"We have to have strategic advantage here and there; we have to hedge ourselves here and there"—and along that way with this misunderstanding they committed blunder after blunder; some of them reach the level of criminal activity like in Syria, in Iraq, for example. And they discussed that with the hierarchy at that time. I told him—"We would be weaving blood instead of, of tears when the American invaded Bimar, established the government there, and they acknowledged the government and exchange"—mil said—"There's absolutely—this an absolute error; it should not have been done. A government run by the Americans is a fundamental enemy here." They have all kind of excuse—"The people who need to visit the, the, the Imams"—that's—this is all not an excuse. If, if Iraqi Muslim, Mashia, Muslim want to visit the Imams in Iran, no problem. They come to the border. You give them a stamp in their passport at the border. If your citizens want to go there, they go to the border. If the Iraqi government deny them the stamp, then they are the guilty one. Just issue of Fatwa. We are not guilty. The Iraqi government is the guilty one. They are enemy of Shism. That's it. No relation, no official relation, no acknowledgement—that government exchange of goods and services, no problem. A truck is having some vegetables—go and no problem—you can have vegetable exchange with, with the enemy at war as long as you are in, in a truce—no problem—what's the problem with that? But don't acknowledge the regime, because if you acknowledge the regime it will dig itself deep and America will be dug deep there, and you will not be able to dislodge them at any—and it's a major strategic mistake to have a, a dangerous lion—or better said—a dangerous next door to. But they don't listen.

Nation in certain injury the wing which controls obviously the intelligence service and so on in Iraq to penetrate the sections which are anyway and so on and to move them against the Iraqi Shia because do not like Iran—so that he commits atrocity against them and then the official Iran tell them—"The, the Jihadi and the Sunni want to kill you. The only position we have is you have to ally with us." Because they were rejecting Iran. They didn't want to be, and they were not accepting the leadership of Iran, not regarding them as, as, as quite different than—they don't recognize them. Nobody gave for them as, and they think nobody of significance like that. So this led to enormous mischief and led also to cooperation with the Syrian intelligence which was participating in the penetration but also helping also their, their masters—the Syrian intelligence. We know their masters—I think know now—but so many times recommended—they belong to the ORIG and specifically later they join even the Habadich oligarchy of Russia. So these meditate through the Syrian intelligence deep in, in, in Iran. So Iran become very exposed and weak. That was one—that's a blunder. You can say it's not really a criminal action in that sense. But it's a blunder. It's a bad blunder. Yes. That the intelligence services worked, worked to move the Jihadi against the Shia. So the Shia will have to run to the, to the embrace of Iran. That's a criminal act. No problem. But it's not a public policy. And this was done secretly without even the Mullahs knowing that—that's almost certain. Okay. So that's one, and then they developed the Islamic State of Iraq and later Islamic State of Iraq and, and at that time were Julian joined—most likely an implant of the Syrian intelligence at that time. So that was one blunder. Later on the situation moved in the Arab world including Syria.

And then the second blunder, which, which developed into a criminal activity, is that they decided to—the decision was split. The security council of Iran which advises about these fundamental things met—one person was absent—and they ended six to six. Six saying—"We cannot step in, in, in Syria supporting Bashar because he's a tyrant, and we as a revolution and the constitution says clearly Iran will be with the oppressed, never with the oppressor"—that would be deadly mistake—other six—"There we will have strategic advantage"—again the same, the same satanic trap—"strategic advantage and we have easy access to his gong ago in the 80s and so on and has friendly relation with Iran which is, is far away—is a minority—is a party—is not a state—and Iran supporting with wealth and money and training—no problem with that—and then we can have an easy access and we can support them this way"—no decision can be made—six to six—the one who was absent from the discussion came and balanced the other evil side—now could have overridden that actually once he has valid in the decision of the, of the, of the this national security council of Iran—once when they suggested to attack Taliban after the affair in time of the affair of the consulate staff who made the mischief in battle and they were killed and things like that—and he said—"No, no, that's, that's a trauma; we don't go there"—something like that—he could have over it—but Allah blinded him from doing the right—so he approved that, and then Iran was sucked into, into a swamp. And not only Iran was sucked, Iran needed the support of Hezbollah, and they sucked with them, which led to the spirit of two factions. The majority were who said—"We have to—we give bay to Iran. We have to obey and we have to support, but in a cautious way at the beginning. But if you are in the battlefield and people are being attacked by explosive bars you will never be able to save yourself the right thing. You would be ultimately going sinking in the swamp and become have the stinky of a swamp"—and that will happen to—it was saved and plenty of it. It's good features which she has in the past in 2006 and before, and the good reputation was gone down the drain—also Iran went down the drain—and all the propaganda—that's for strategic reason for the co-resistance front—all of it did not work, and it's clearly propaganda—it's proven—you have seen, seen—and Bashar was not—Bashar, Bashar is not just a fraud, man—strong man—the, the ruling elite, the, the leadership of the party—and mostly society—but not alloc—some—so al they are Catholic and Christian and so on—maybe the majority are like that—and some—they say—"This a high day—let's milk Iran"—they milk Iran—Iran spend there in, in, in, in the military support and from their own pocket about 30 millions in the 10 years or something like that—more than 10, almost 12 years—which Iran needed very badly. Secondly, they gave loans to the government there which are now nobody will pay them back—almost the same amount. So it's a catastrophic loss financially at least. And then when Assad become sour with Iran and his started—like in 2015, 16 roughly in that time frame—there was something getting sour. He called his friend and lover Putin for help, who came in claiming that he helped Iran strategically, and he came to support Bashar and to support the Israeli Zionist agenda. That's what he came for. So moral of this point of the story—don't trust Putin ever. Be careful. Whatever he does, Israel and the West is closer to his heart than us Muslims. Whatever he does, don't even trust. And clearly, it's clear for that what he's doing that he is not sincere and he will never give you preference over the other. But now in the recent couple of years, he's forced because he received so many drones and so many military support and guns and, and ammunition from Iran. He has to put a smile. But otherwise, he's against Iran having nuclear weapons. He's against Iran having a nuclear program. He is continuously against Iran and never gave any excellent technology. Nothing—whatever extent technology in Iran has is a century of self-development or probably from China. Yeah. Barely anything from, from, from Russia. Even the air defense system S300—it was clear from the recent development that they needed S400 and something better—nothing delivered—only very late something which is not operated yet very much as far—but they developed their own, and it seems to me they were able to shoot some F35, so they have their own good developments here. So that's what happened—so Syria became a nightmare—at least are seeing in front of ourselves—and what worse than the catastrophe of being defeated in Syria—what she say is a good punishment for their misdeeds there and their criminal misdeeds—is that their relation with the, with the Sunni world, with the rest of the Muslims became really sour—is really today. And then 7 of October happened, showing the real deep vision of—there's a speech of them in Arabic saying—"I see how this will change the area—not only the area and the region will change—the whole world—you don't see it here, but I see it in front of my eyes"—the same said—he said of 1 September 11—"This will drag America and the Muslim world, and we are going to slaughter them here like we slaughtered the Soviet Union"—and this is now being partly materialized, and the rest inshallah is coming. You have to have people of vision like that—going from fundamental principles—not from tactics or strategic advantage—limited advantage here and there. You don't neglect those—you take them into consideration. You give yourself—this is the time for that—but don't make that a foundation you build your action. So yes—started that—some people criticize saying—"Oh, that was not consulted"—why even the leadership outside was not consulted—"No, the leadership knew something—they knew—they were there for 10 years before that. They know what's going on generally. They don't know the name and it will be launched now or in this year or next year, but they know the general idea. That's number one. Secondly, the people there in Raza and the—there are the one who may see you because they are who will fight and one who will die. The one who are far away enjoying the air conditioning and should not be overriding that anyway. But independent of that—they don't have the vision—that they were not informed. I think this was a right decision by—he has to keep the secrecy of the day to the utmost level because he has seen already that Iran is not really tied in of intelligence. So many people have been assassinated. He was clearly—I think he was clear in his mind that Syria, the Bashar and the regime are traitors. I think clearly in his mind, and he was doubting that is dense enough and impermeable for, for penetration which are proven to be also correct. Well that has to be correct. So he did not inform anybody. Only the leadership there were informed—which is a wise decision. That's a correct decision. Now at the beginning Iran was not informed and they didn't have—there's no problem with that—but there were many opportunities along the way they could catch the opportunity and do something—first opportunity—the ruling of

The ICG, they didn't do anything. Most likely because the American bluff—you remember I commented on the American saying, "We're coming, don't widen the wall, don't do that"—but then say, "Don't." The black guy was Austin, Steve Austin, not Steve, the minister, Department of Defense, Secretary of Defense—don't, everyone say don't, don't. If you remember, if you check my data, that I'm told this is bluff, but unfortunately, they swallowed the bluff. They were bluffed. Most likely they are conditioned to accept that because they have decided, without confronting America—America is the master of the universe. Nobody can confront and escape. That's what they think. If you condition your mind this way, you will never be able to confront the body. So they missed that opportunity.

Then, when he starts his full-scale operation, they also missed the opportunity to join. And then, after the pag being, they missed the opportunity to support his. They keep missing, missing, missing, thinking they can't get away. And then, obviously, the other side—these people are chicken. They can't be bullied. All what we need is to do like break by fatigue. You know, if you take a steel bar and then twist it, straight twist, straight. If you do it sufficiently many times, 10, 20, 100,000 times, it will break. You know that, but you break it. Aha. They are afraid. They are wetting their pants. Now, how can we do that properly?

They started the coming of Trump doing the job as I described. We have to negotiate a new deal. No enrichment. No. No. Enrichment must be done. Wood Coke says enrichment. Yes. Up to 5%. No. No. Next time. No. No. 5% is too much. 3.75. If you need 20% for medical rate, you buy from that. Okay, maybe that. Then, next meeting, say no, no, no, no, there is the Congress is objecting to that, the Congress is insisting, and that's they issued a resolution that anything more than zero is not acceptable, the whole program must be scrubbed, like Libya, the Libyan solution, and adopted that and hammered everywhere around that and come say, "No, no enrichment," and then still Iran attended that, and then uh, people mediated, and then uh, Iran accepted to meet another time, and they kept playing the game, getting the resources in place, completing the job of preparation, similar they did in Russia, with with the with the penetration with the with the trucks and so on, exact, almost the same, it seems to be the design. In Russia, they adopted it—was not done in Russia, not executed yet, but it was advanced and ready to be executed in the proper time in Russia. So it adopted it, and Russia seems to be going to a reasonable success. So it should succeed in Iran. Russia is more definitely tighter than Iran intelligence. It has a vicious intelligence, about since the time of Soviet Union and so on, but is a very wide country. So there are more penetration points, but it's doable there. It will be doable there. Yeah.

And they kept last ditch for this Sunday to today. There was supposed to be a meeting, started drum, starting to, they start drumming, "No, it will be no arrangement, arrangement, no arrangement," okay, we'll see what we discuss on Sunday, giving everyone the impression, everyone in the world was having the impression that there will be no action until—even myself I was fooled by that—there would be no action until until Sunday. It was really very skillful, so you can't blame Iran really to to uh to uh to be taken by surprise, and that so the court will punch down. So the first attack was quite devastating, mostly put down from inside, but nevertheless, this Iran was not that badly prepared in the sense that many of rocket launcher turned out to be to be just just dummies made out of wood and painted nicely. So most of the the rocket launchers claimed have destroyed, they they destroy these things made out of wood shapes, nothing else, almost nothing of in relevance. That's number one. Second, the air the air defense forces were in a protected shelters and so on, inactivated, so they could not see them because they don't have radar, so some precaution this did work, and later that is the case. So the first attack, the first night, was was quite devastating, assassinations, attacking nothing, and some other crucial places, and they seem to be roaming around in the Iranian airspace.

I know someone who has given up and said, "It's over, Iran's consciousness." I said, "Don't be in a hurry. These things are not decided in one day like that. That's that's not how things work." But he was insisting. Then, barely next morning, the first Iranian counterattack came, and his spirit was lifted. The was like that, one action brings your spirit deep down, another one up. I told him, "Don't be jubilant yet, it's step by step, slow, one by one," and then was the back and forth until the recent one, I think it was this morning or yesterday, was the refinery and high facility we have rebuilt, and most were very important, also the ammonium factory. People say, "What's ammonium factory?" Ammonium am factory is very substantial for exclusive and the rocket rocket fuel manufacturer, very fundamental, very fundamental. So if these two are hit and destroyed, that's a massive strategic cross for his side. The first night, Trump was jubilant, Lindsey Graham was jubilant, everyone jubilant, glo and so on. Now Trump is getting a new tune, "The war must stop." He communicated with—within only our—knows what they have discussed. Now Putin is way too intelligent to express to to Trump what he believes and his feelings. But he agreed with Trump. He agreed long ago. That's we know that he is against a nuclear program of of Iran. But certainly against nuclear weapons for Iran. He would never allow that if he can. But he can't. So he said, "Let me work on that. Maybe I can persuade him to something." He will not tell Trump, "I'm working with Is," and so on. He will not say that, but some know that it's not a secret. It's only secret for the Iranian, poor Iranian being fooled by uh Putin. They call him in Iran and also Lebanon, say, "If you, unbelievable, how can you call yourself to that level?"

I remember I have a tweet, maybe get out 2018 or 19. It was very primitive. There was like a fortification that was actually the original picture was the walls of Troy, but it was written on it, "Islamic Republic of Iran" on the front, the the Trojan horse made out of wood, and the time they didn't have artificial intelligence and nice things. So I just took two pictures. One picture of Putin, one of Bashar, and put them on the—I couldn't do it more sophisticated than that. That was clear warning of Iran, "Don't trust that Trojan horse. Bashar and Putin are enemies. They are a Trojan horse." For me, that was clear, the 2018, 2019. I hope it's clear for them. Does not mean you don't smile in his face if you meet and remind him of the strategic cooperation. You will continue continue getting what you can get, but always be certain that he will stab you with his knife in the back. That's the way to go. Don't be politically mentally like who thinks that American business is great. He loves peace and so on. That's a sign of mental retardation in political terms, not in as a as a surgeon. He's an excellent surgeon, allegedly. Yeah. He can open your belly and do an extent surgery. But does not mean he can he can deal with with Trump and Putin, or what? That's another skill. This is a skill. It's a skill skill. The man in that those areas is is really—but not in such a way that you would put him in a state jacket and put him in the middle. Unfortunately, if it would be like that, he would not be in the sitting in the presidential seat until now. But that expression, his statement and sayings, shows complete ination. He said, "Even if they destroy the whole nuclear program, we can rebuild it again." What kind of statement is that? See, we have all the applications that they will not be able to destroy, but if they destroy—Allah forbid—they destroy it, will be destroyed before something like that that you can build it—not build it—you don't need to assure the people that they have built it first time, they can build the second time. Such a statement shows that you somehow you have a tradition in your mind, you don't know how to address the public, and so there's the world saw you rebuild it again. What kind of a statement is that? And many other his name. He says, "The doors to negotiations could not completely close. Maybe in the future, if the war is over, we go back to negotiation." This should not be said. It's understandable. People negotiate afterwards. What's the problem with that? You don't need to say it. If you say it, the people say, "Ah, he's again peeing in his pants. We can push for." That's the only meaning they will understand, that they will not understand anything else, but I think I think he's—I don't think he's mentally that—I think he's a traitor, or he's an—he surrendered to America. There's no way we can confront America in our lifetime or in the next generation. We have just to submit, or straight—either one of two, but not mentally foundation like this. This is a poor guy. I think he's a he's just is a—So that's that's what's happening until now.

Iranian counterattacks are quite good. Headquarter of the military, because they attack the military staff and so on, leadership. That's good. Ministry of Defense is good. To attack the refinery and the ammonium factory. They attacked also the air airfields. Most the airfield are not used. It seems to be almost certain that the fire planes are starting from—all the British ambassador to United Nation rejected that sharply and accused Russia of lying. But the Russian ambassador say, "We know that the planes are finding protection in in the in the British base," and she was outraged. "That's absolutely not true, and saying something that is completely irresponsible," and things like that. But she was clearly in a state of rage that is being exposed here. Rage indicates clearly there's not a way that is there some truth to this fact, and the Russian would not have said that without having evidences, etc., photos. So attacking the airfields is good for making them unusable for the future. But the focus should be now on on um, if any, if it's going on—I don't know what's going on at the moment—and on the electricity generation. They have four outdated, old-fashioned generation plants. They can be all leveled, and there's another refinery that one should be also leveled. All in all, they they they caught themselves after the first night shock, which like almost 12 hours they were wavering, and there was no fear if they're still alive or dead and so on. They seem to have stabilized themselves, and the stabilization is increasing, and this seems to be the initial jubilation of Trump and is has evaporated, and the fact that if Trump is said the war has stopped, discussed with Putin, that indicates that he's not confident about a near victory as in the first day, and he thinks that may backfire. So he's trying to over some kind of a ceasefire at the moment. Not normally, it will be to give as an opportunity and himself and his his gang to bring supplies, which need maybe two to three weeks, such massive supplies, because there are such considerable gear which need ships to to to be to deliver for weapons, and also seem to be also the iron dome and and David Sling and so on seem to be exhausted. It seems to be the dissection in the last in the last salvo was minimal. So they're getting exhausted now, and these may be delivered by aeroplanes, but where do the aeroplanes land? That's a problem. So so they need some breather and so on. So so this is a trick, should not be accepted, and the statement from Iran say that we if if stops the attacks, we then decide to we may decide to stop. So they have to stop first. Such a statement may be okayish. I would I would not have even addressed that. I would have kept kept them in suspense. They are aggressive. They started, they violate international law. They started the war without war declaration. This is a war. So we are in a state of war with now. We have all the right to use all means of war. That should be the statement. But unfortunately, the guys in Tan, they are their mental state and their way of formulating is just hopeless. It's just utterly hopeless. Even when he formulates things in a strong way, his formulation is not satisfactory. He doesn't have to formulate him. Unfortunately, someone says, "Who are you to teach formulation?" Yeah, we teach him formulation. His formulations are miserable. Teach him, teach others how to formulate, and we are ready to offer him what how to formulate if he contacts and asks. We can't contact him; we have no access to him. If you want to listen with others and they can suggest, but he clearly he's not able, but he's much better in some having some tough statements, but he doesn't for them such such reactive way which reflects what Quran has advised and what direction to go. So he did not study the Quran, which he promised before Ramadan to do. He did not. He should have done the day he became. He should be all the time studying the Quran. See how to get and get guidance from that. Read read read information and so on until he gets some idea in his mind. But unfortunately, seems to be the man is living beh—I I honestly don't know. I I'm not very optimistic that they will be having enough mindset and internal energy of of confrontation.

Let me tell you what I give you an example of confrontation. When America said, "Milan is behind December 11," right or wrong, it doesn't matter. Said, "Yes, that's fine. You have evidence. If you have evidence, bring them. We have a court here." Bush was outraged. This whole arrogant world is collapsing. An insignificant guy, high school teacher, is asking to come to Afghanistan. He says, "Destroy you and you destroy your country." What did he say? "You promise to destroy us and our country. Allah promised us victory. We will see which promise will materialize." And he went to the mountain. Simple. No swearing, no bad words, but no wishy-washy say diplomacy and words. Simple. No swearing. No, he don't say, "You are son of a—" No, no, no need for that. Clean, proper, respectful language. "You promise that, Allah promised that, we'll see which promise will materialize," and go to the mountain. He died along the way, but he has the will to go to the mountain. He's not he's not climbing to the chair. And you know it's a matter of confrontation between Islam and matter of life and death, worth dying for. That's all what you need to know. And then it took 20 years for Taliban. Yes. Because the next country which supporting them, Pakistan and the are traitors, they betrayed them. They sold them out. Nobody supported except a little bit from Iran revolutionary guard. By the way, maybe you don't know that. I know that I have connection with persons who know that and have information and detail, and they give her they harbor some Taliban and Harvard also, and they will for some time. I know that that's all the only and faction of it, only that's it, nobody else. Later on, when the Chinese recognized it's going downhill with the American, they started communicating with Taliban and having supply from the high mountains because they have a small border in joint with with with with China there. So they were getting weapons and so on and and gear and so on and establish good relations with the result. Now look at Afghanistan. Now they have considerable lithium lithium mining and not only mining but also production. They have electric car production. They have industrialization. They have established steel industry. They have established various industries. See the difference between these and other countries who who have tons of money, trillions, and they wasted them in on prostitutes and and homosexual prostitutes, Saudi Arabia and so on. So you can see that difference. It's a matter of mindset, not how much weapons you have. In Afghanistan, he knows that the country is a mountainous, and he can't find their in the mountains in the caves and fight there for years. He benefits the same with Yemen, and they take themselves better than the Iranian. All the American attacks did not get any anything really out of any relevance. Not even single banker was in penetrated. Maybe some entrance for bankers have been demolished, and that can be cleaned in a couple of days. The difference of the mindset, it is the mindset. So the mindset of the Iranian leadership is unfortunately not promising.

We go to the mythical side. I have a strong feeling that what's happening to Iran now is really a punishment for the misdeeds and the blunder, especially that what they did in Syria, and they forsaken for the forsaken of forsaken, especially of—because—belong to you is the same mad they gave you, if you—meaning he's responsible for you, and you're responsible to him—they did their part of the responsibility without any doubt, but you did not do the part of your responsibility, just the opposite, that you let them down, you have forsaken them. You give them the wrong advice and let them be hammered. It's not m just sending some weapons and money. That's not the issue. They sometimes the support, standing firm in certain situation is that would make history. That's it. And they failed that. So it's a divine punishment, my feeling—that's not nobody should dare saying this is a punishment that we saying about Allah without knowledge—but my feeling it seems to be a divine punishment. All what I hope, I'm praying for, is that the punishment—and there will be more sufferers still to come, there will be much more—that the punishment will not go to the level that the regime collapses completely, or even if it collapses before that, it should have deal a mortal blow to Islam at least, hopefully, if it's deal a mortal blow to—is it can go—I don't care about—but I don't think is added to the great any great for benefit with these blunders and with these with these arrogance and these uh behavior of of—"We know everything, you don't know anything. I received some kind of a revelation from some hidden im, and you are just like a minor." That's the meaning of a faky—the is worry the same thing like a father worry on the minor children. No, it's not. It's not. Sorry. Sorry, guys. That's not—We are not accepting that. And this will lead nowhere. Will lead downhill. But I hope still there will be enough capacity there to deal and eliminate it. I think—but nobody will listen to advice. If they accept the ceasefire in the that stops only the condition. If the stops, we may stop. Okay, so then it should be with the focus to watch the other side what they are doing, at the same time take over in Iraq, because Iraq is the only place where the American could amass such forces that they could harass and invade the Iranian main country. They have now like 30,000 there, 20 to 30,000, and they can easily within few months, like they did in the Gulf War, get to get get it up to 100, 150. Will Trump do that? I think this Trump may become desperate, and he may even postpone the issue with China and do that first. So the best thing is then just to contact the Hashid and the other groups who shall pro resistance and so on, verify the matter with them, apologize for the past wrong wrong wrong behavior you have you have to apologize—the other side will never believe you and work with you until you tell, "We made a mistake." Mistake is like now is like that now. First target the green zone, Sudani and and Malik and all these bunch of traitors out. We don't need to hang them from the feet like Mussolini, just stay home for God's sake, we don't need you, and get the control of the army and tell the Americans, "You have said welcome, you leave now, and I will fight you," and then you control Iraq, then there's no food place they can put their food there, nowhere there's no place they can put their foot there, and any attempt to invade in the depth of Iran and they demolish it or divide it will fail. They should not be allowed to have a base anywhere, solid place where they can accommodate 150,000 of soldiers should not be allowed. If—but watch carefully what's happening and don't trust that Trump really wants ceasefire. He is a liar, and he's a traitor, and he's a deceiver. That's proven; you don't need any federal proof, the proof is there. I think that's the first—if you accept the ceasefire, then have that as a target number one. In addition, obviously strengthening the internal front, getting more supplies from China, rearranging things, and also obviously tomorrow the the parliament is meeting, it is mandatory to kick out the inspectors of the international energy energy commission, because these guys are spies. It's proven; you have the documents, and you have publicized it's already so finished. We we are not accommodating for—

Spies, you are out. Secondly, there's there's already a draft on the parliament saying that we have to exit the NPT. I think this afternoon it should be passed, and the exec must be started immediately. That's that's it. That's it. That's the way it to go.

And then cooperate with Pakistan to complete if if a nuclear device is nuclear done. I think it's already done. People exaggerate a matter of having an having the mechanism for for putting uranium together in in a uranium testing. Does not take testing, even the first one ever in history, which was used I think was not tested for the first one, which is the first one before the one was tested in the plutonium one, because the mechanism is quite complex and you cannot trust the calculation 100%. I doubt that now we need can because so so many tests have been made and so many leaks about the structure, and Pakistan can help delivering that, or why did you do with them a treaty or something like that should be attended to with the speediest possible way because Pakistan is this direction, although I know they're ruling Samafia in the shame of a state, but they know very well from the history and from the attempt of India and is time past to destroy a nuclear program that is a deadly enemy. If they can defeat and destroy Iran or put it under nuclear threat, next would be Iran, Pakistan. So for them, it's is an existential threat. For them, it's an existential threat. So they can help, and there's enough for uranium at least for 15 20 nuclear devices is already there. You just need to to to accept if it's already done. Maybe it has been done somewhere in a hidden place. It takes only few days from 60 to 95 1995; it's easy and the mechanism is easy. I think the mechanism is already in place. I don't think we need even to ask Pakistan for that. The mechanism is very simple. It's not that people exaggerate and make it bigger than it is. So this is they would close out tomorrow if they are serious, if they want to really survive, if they have awakened up to the reality of the enemy there.

Don't worry about the diplomatic language in this. You can use diplomatic language as long as you know what you are doing. Inspectors and cameras turn off; inspectors out. Thank you very much. Go to the airport. Bye-bye. See you later.

Number one. Two. Authorization of the government to start a process of getting authority immediately. The process takes I don't know how long it takes. Someone must read the treaty. It may take six months. You give the United Nation a certain statement you think like that. Do the next step on and then you out, if that's it. No more negotiation. That's fine. Fine. That's over. Don't take that. If you want to do something else, come with your weapons and show us what you have. For that you need has to have the stamina and the conviction in yourself and the belief in Allah. That will be the test.

Third, leaders with Pakistan about the nuclear issue, even possibly making a treaty as a bridging arrangement and then extend agreement to anyway China is already sending cargo planes with with suppliers and mostly anti-air missiles and things like that. Essentially, the air force always is quite backward, relatively backward, relying mostly on F4 Phantoms. These are ancient planes, but these are doing a good job with the with the drones and so on because they are although they are ancient they are perfect for the drones. They clean the space from drones considerably, and the air defense system seems to be able to get the at least one F-35 still to be down, and one I think is a female pilot is already apprehended. So it's not that extremely bad, but further supply is needed. If it is done properly, it is very well feasible, and also look at the issue of Iraq in a serious way, in a really serious way, and that's the reason Trump is barking any touching of all forces in Iraq with the government in Baghdad will will be responsible; he he's bluffing again. What are you going to do? Come on. Send your forces to fight there. Come. Come. Let's see how we can fight. This is all bluff. Don't be fooled by the bluff again. You were fooled in the seventh October after with with the with the ships coming and and the poor almost barefoot and were not fed, and they hammered America and chased away several aircraft carriers and chased the whole the whole American fleet in the area away. Simple as that. Just by recognizing this is a bluff, we're going to deal with it, but dealing with it is not is not a walk in the park. You may get killed. Aha, that's the point. Are you ready for that? Are you ready for my freedom or not? Make your decision. Is it worth dying for? That's the point. You make that decision, that conviction.

Clarify with your own people. The people are clear; demonstration in in even people or women who is not having a hijab, which is against the law in Iran. I don't know which kind of law, stupid law is that anyway, but anyway that's that's their anyway. She said we have plenty of things against is where is where is the attack against why we don't have nuclear weapons and stop them in their time. That's a problem for everyone with you. Just go for it and do do real strong things. Don't let things stretch infinitely. And don't think ever that sanction will be lifted. Never. Ever. Look at the sanction of Russia with all the discussion between Putin and so on. He's even thinking to add more sanctions. These people are useless. They are hopeless. The only way to deal with them is to break their head and kick their sanctions in the butt. That's it. The only way to do and it's very feasible. Don't bother about their assumptions. They will ultimately collapse. So that's the the the reasonable marching approach for the coming few days. If you follow this way or similarly or the same level with certain modification is that then then this is a sign. If they start wavering and stepping back without really associated action to show that they are benefiting from the time with the stepping back the stepping back, you can step back but to put your back to a wall and start another movement, not to go back just for going back and back and back and back until you fall in the abyss like they have until now. If that's the way, okay, but we'll see what they do. First test tomorrow and we watch and if they succeed in these two points, getting the inspectors out, bye-bye. Thank you very much for your for your being a guest for this a long time, but this time now to leave you all said you're welcome. And secondly, start a process for getting out of the NPT. Start with it immediately. Then we know they are serious and they are worthy of survival and they can recover from all the mistakes and the crimes they committed in their past. Otherwise, it looks very bleak. If they allow things to continue the same way in the past, it will end with invading Iran Iran. They will inflame sectarian separatist movements, ethnic movements, etc. And they will split the country like they did in Iraq, split in the three parts essentially. They keeping it nominal as a federation but really split. The center government has no authority in Kistan. Anyway, Kistan is an Israeli occupied area; American occupied area that is American occupied area. The south is only knows who is occupied, most likely American and British. That's it; that's what can happen to to to Iran despite of all it's the area despite of all population if the leadership faults us and make the mistakes continue making the mistakes time pass. Okay, I think that's that's I think that's it in everything is as usual; people go to to pick food and they were fighting the 10 kil in 2030 and so on. That's ongoing as in terms of the defense by the Stumbag Arab rulers, Jordan, um UAE, nothing can be done. Let's get Iraq first and then from there you can't think about getting Jordan. Don't tell people; don't waste any on the moment they come publicly, hammer them. That's it. I'm talking about the awam. So, for example, all this all this stuff that's happening. So, the CC's goons now attacking people on the in on the border, people going over Iran has to manage Israel and America now and manage Iraq. That's it. Focus there. Otherwise, you'll get diverted in issues which are none of your business for the moment. But I'm talking about in terms of rest of the um in terms of you see we're talking 30 years to the um repeating it every day. Are you familiar with um are you familiar with the recent um so so with with the convoy that's that have been going over to to um Egypt being stopped? Yeah, I bet. Yeah, I bet. I know it's being stopped. Yeah. In terms of is that a good initiative? Should people is it is it something to support? Is it something that we any initiative to trouble the regime and embarrass them? Is a good initiative. Question on the issue of sectarianism right now. So for example, suspiciously people have chosen this opportunity now to who who don't necessarily talk about Palestine or or or about the evils of the Arab regimes, but now they start to talk about it's an opportunity to gloat at what's happening in Iran. Any word on that? No need for we have discussed that many times. We know that these 16 the dumb heads would heads who have no brain guided by some of and so on by regimes who are that's it. So the solution for that is is well known. We have mentioned that all the time. Cut the head of the snake. Then the snake is gone. But at the moment how to cut the head of the snake. And now the snake thinks it can get away. They were gloating the first day. Now if you check today, you see that the gloating is a little little bit less. Even America and Europe is a little bit less. And if tomorrow Iran does the right thing, it will be a little less be screaming and yawning and but it will not help them. You have to do it step by step, one by one. And the and the the traders like Saudi Arabia, like Emirat, they are very cautious. They're extremely cautious. They yesterday or day two days ago they have the airplanes around Yemen. Allah knows why and so on because they thought maybe Iran will collapse. They live in a dream world and then they can start their invasion again. They're living even even if Iran collapses. Yemen will defeat them. They will end with if they do anything it will be learned with their destruction definitely because the learned the lesson and we have addressed that even through private channel public channels don't make the mistake of the 2000 2019 when they listen to the miserable Iranian advice about Saudi Arabia they could have demolished Saudi Arabia that time the whole area would have changed radically but unfortunately it didn't happen anyway past is gone and we learn from the lesson and they gave us the clear instructions. Some people were getting hyper and saying uh we will attack the refiners. No, no, no refiners, nothing. Palaces of the king and his associates, maybe the minister of defense, minister of interior apparatus and the pumping station in Rastan. That's more than enough. When we see swimming in a motor car, that's it. If they escape, that's it. That's not a matter of emotion; matter of cold calculated thinking the regime will collapse will go; no more heads rational heads are needed now as I told him in 2019 but most likely they took the advice of the Iran no no this will destabilize the Americans will come here and eat everyone no they will not come they will eat nobody tell us they will not come they will not eat nobody but Naomi have no experience that the American came we ate the American they didn't eat us so they passed that stage now so if so they didn't make any mistakes or not makes the mistake they are gone but definitely gone and they will be soon moderating their blah blah blah 6 blah blah because they feel the life at their neck but most important condition that Iran does the right thing that will accelerate the process. If it doesn't the thing Iran will be hammed, maybe disintegrating will take several months and then again and Yemen will be alone and alone and they're more than enough but it will take longer. More pain, more suffering. That's it. I repeat that. Keep that on record. They are more than enough. We don't need Iran. We need just to things and reduce the pain on our side and reduce their pain. They thought they will avoid the pain. It's not not avoidable. The only way to avoid the pain of Iran is to give up the nuclear program and prostrate to America. Are they willing to do that? Make your decision. Life is about making fundamental decisions. If the nuclear program is not a fundamental issue for life and death for you, give it up. Forget about it. You cannot sneak. It doesn't work this way. Go to the fundamental doctrinal base. Are you an Islamic regime for the oppressed also with the with the with the oppressed or are you another regime like the the the dog in the in the Arab and most of the Muslim world and then why done all these efforts on this headache? Just lift the enjoy yourself and have money coming in and dancing clubs and so on. Enjoy yourself. You have to make a fundamental decision what you want. You can't postpone that decision. That decision is a decision. It sounds trivial, but that's that's it. Decision A or B. You're not going to get there by by sneaking and playing games. This had never worked in history. Never ever and will never work in the future until you walk down. And if you doubt, read what read, read what happened in read what happened in Han and then you see what's how the way looks like especially in Han they were all impressed about their number. We are no way we can be defeated because of numbers. Yeah, you can be defeated because of numbers. The same with Iran will not be defeated. We have so many rockets and so no you can easily be defeated with so many multitudes boasting about your own multitude. No no no no victory is from Allah ultimately the willing to stand until you die if you say if it's worth have to make the decision simple decision but fundamental one go to basics and start from there not that if I control Syria and throw some some bombs on some rebellious people I can't support his is not the way to go why I am there in the first place what is the purpose of the whole Why I'm doing it? Why I'm defending Iran? Is that because I'm a nationalist or an Islamist or what is it? What's going on there? If you don't have the simple answer for the fundamental question, you will not proceed. You will be wavering and that's what's handicapping Iran. The key position in ministry of foreign affairs and in presidency and so on are usually populated by traitors or sellouts or or surrender defeatist people who are defeated completely who have absolutely no hope that they will be ever able to to be victorious will be ever able to convert America or be ever able to stand in their own feet. They are conquered internally already. America does not need to fight them. Are conquered. That's it. Get the people always to the fundamental basics. What is the fundamental basics? How to make sense of what's going on? Okay, that's it. But let's see the coming few days. I think recently see what develops. What happened?