King Charles III is the FOURTH Horseman, but is Donald J. Trump the FIRST? SUBSCRIBE & SHARE

And I think that my volume. Let me, let me hear your volume real quick, just to make sure we're >> testing one, two, three. >> Testing one, two, three. >> One, two, three. >> Okay, perfect. It's right on target with mine. So, we will go ahead. We're, we are recording. So, what I usually do is I will do an intro for this video after the fact, just kind of that way I can throw together something like a hook that gets people hooked on what we're going to say. And then I'll ask you, uh, what you know, just to kind of give your story about why you wrote the book and all these different things, and then we'll get into the subject. So, here we go. >> Sounds great. >> So, excuse me. Tim Cohen, welcome to the broadcast. It's exciting to talk to you. It's been a while since we've talked, and I think last time there was another person that we were talking with. So, I'm glad to be able to just me and you have a sit down, have a talk about this. You wrote a book called Antichrist and a Cup of Tea, which it was an amazing book. Uh, when we interviewed before and after I read the book, I was really intrigued by what you were saying, and I'm curious to hear more about it and to be able to expand this to my audience as well. So, welcome to the broadcast, Tim. >> Thank you. Really glad to be with you, John. It's been too long, so really looking forward to this. >> Right on. So, you're, you have written a book that talks about King Charles being the Antichrist. And so get us started on that. What, why did you write the book, and do you still think that that's a possibility? >> So, I was a cadet at the Air Force Academy, class of 1988. Had been a believer for just under a year, uh, in 1987, when I asked the Lord to show me who and what was being spoken of in Revelation chapter 13, specifically, the strange imagery of that first beast. Beast with feet like a bear, body like a leopard, mouth like a lion, to whom the dragon gives it power, throne of great authority. And, you know, I knew there was no such thing in nature, presumably. And I thought, okay, could that be a chimeric hybrid? Is this some symbolism nobody's ever seen? You know, what's it talking about? So I asked God, actually, to show me. And within a month of that, I had the actual imagery in my hands, and I also had the name calculation that's at the end of that chapter in my hands. And so, uh, at that point, I concluded that the person was already alive at that point, already a very popular man throughout the world. And, um, so I figured, well, we probably don't have that long. And I set out to begin to research it and then ultimately to write the book that became The Antichrist. And originally, that was an appendix to a much larger tome that is still coming, hopefully later this year, titled Messiah, History, and the Tribulation Period, a multi-series. So that appendix became a significant book in its own right. And, uh, we can see that here shortly. But there was a 1998 edition, the first edition, published 11 years after I began writing it. And then two years ago, a little over two years ago, uh, roughly, the 2024 second edition went to press, uh, which is a massive update, you know, almost twice the content of the first edition. A lot of new evidence came along in the intervening years, and some things have happened since then as well. Uh, in terms of, do I think he is the Antichrist? 100%. God showed me originally. And as time progresses, this, uh, case only gets stronger. Even now, that is the situation. While people are looking at other individuals like Trump or Kushner, you know, whomever, uh, because they're not well-grounded in scripture, they think they know a lot more than they do about scripture, and, uh, and about history and people, and they just don't know what they're talking about. So I'll make that very clear for the audience as we proceed tonight. And, you know, some of this already, you've read the first edition, I believe, and perhaps the second edition. >> I, I will have to check it out. I So, my question is, I guess, you know, there's a lot of people that say, this qualification, this qualification, this qualification has to be for, uh, someone to be the Antichrist. What are the actual qualifications for someone to be the Antichrist? And why do you think, I know, I know this is a long question, and you could go on about this for a while, but I guess first off, what are the qualifications of somebody being the Antichrist? >> So, let's, uh, look at Revelation 13. If you don't mind, I'll show the chapter and I'll show the qualifications. It's much simpler, actually, than people realize to identify the individual. There's much more to him than the identification, but just to identify him is actually not so complicated as it turns out, uh, when God points you in the right direction. So, um, yeah, I'm trying to share a window. Are you seeing the scripture? Revelation 13. >> I see it plain and clear. Yep. >> So, what we need to know as Christians to actually identify the Antichrist with biblical hard evidence, meaning unassailably, unambiguously, no ifs, ands, or buts, is right here in this chapter. And then we can go to Daniel chapter 7, and I'll show something briefly there, briefly there as well. So, in verse two, you've got two beasts in this chapter. One rises out of the sea. That's the first beast that we're going to address. Another that arises out of the earth, the second beast that we're not really going to touch on tonight in any detail. The second one is typically understood as the false prophet. The first one is typically understood as the Antichrist. And just to be clear, folks, there are many antichrists historically, biblically. There are many antichrists today. And there is the spirit of antichrist that has been operative for at least two and a half millennium, uh, millennia, since like the midpoint of the week of history, about three and a half thousand years after Adam and Eve, in other words. So, there's not just one Antichrist, one counterfeit Messiah type figure, one counterfeit savior type figure, but there is one individual who is the top dog Antichrist of all history and prophecy, whom the devil himself will possess for three and a half years throughout the period of what's called the Great Tribulation, immediately preceding Armageddon. And that individual will be over a global government, as well, as we're going to see in this chapter. That person is called the Antichrist simply because not because he's the only one, but because he's the top one. He's over all the others, and he sums up within himself what every other Antichrist of history has been and represents. So, here verse two starts with the recognition of the imagery. So, it says, "Now the beast which I saw was like a leopard. His feet were like the feet of a bear, and his mouth like the mouth of a lion." So, the first thing I'll say on that, John, is it says "like, like." It doesn't say that it is the body of a leopard. It does not say that it is the feet of a bear. It does not say that it is the mouth of a lion. In other words, we're talking about similes. When we see the chimeric imagery, it reminds us of those things. And we'll, we'll see that when I show the actual imagery here shortly. Then it says, "The dragon gave him his power, throne, and great authority." Well, according to the prior chapter, Revelation 12, that is a fiery red dragon, the serpent who deceived Eve in the Garden of Eden, called the devil, etc. Revelation 12 explicitly states that. And that's significant because if we go back to that word translated as serpent in the book of Genesis when Eve and then Adam were deceived, that particular Hebrew word can literally be translated as fiery red dragon. Very few people know that, but it's talking about a coppery serpent that can be dragonlike. In other words, and John in Revelation 12 made it explicit, fiery red dragon. Now, that's the imagery, right? That's what I asked God to show me. You know, who and what is this talking about? Because it's bizarre. You know, is this going to be some chimeric hybrid or whatever? And then when we get to the end of this chapter, and I'm going to skip over the stuff on the global government here for a moment, it gives us a criterion by which to concretely identify this individual. It says, and this is verse 18 of Revelation 13, the final verse of the chapter. It says, quote, "Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666." Most people who read that, John, think, well, let me see if so and so, who seems evil to me, has a name that calculates to 666. What kind of mathematical system can I contrive or look up or come up with to work this out to 666? Could he be the Antichrist? Right? That's the approach that people have typically taken, and it's, uh, completely ignorant biblically to do that. It's the approach that most prophecy, quote unquote, scholars and teachers and pundits take today, who are, and I'll just say this, they're novices. So, here's what it says there. There are four points to be made from this one verse. The first is that we're talking about the number of the beast. In other words, if that imagery that I referenced at the beginning of the chapter doesn't exist for the man in question, it doesn't matter what calculation you come up with. It's out of context and it has no meaning biblically other than perhaps at most suggesting the individual is associated with the Antichrist system. That's it. >> So, what about people? There's going to be people that come on here in the comments. They're going to say, "Well, >> the Antichrist doesn't like women or the Antichrist is supposed to be beloved by all." What do you say to those things? Because I know that that's like the knee-jerk reaction that people are going to say about King Charles because I knew I read the comments, I guess, after we talked, and so that was one of the couple of the main arguments against this. >> Okay, I'll wrap up these points and then we'll go directly to that, and then we'll come back to this. >> Yeah. Okay. Yeah, please do, just because I want to go ahead and get that out of the >> out of people's, you know, the that whole question because I, you know, how people are, they'll turn things off, uh, very quickly if they don't get the answer they're looking for. So, >> Well, let me just start by saying people who think that those are criteria have not read scripture carefully and don't know biblical history. The first criterion you asked about comes from Daniel 11, having to do with the king of the north. We'll go look at the verse itself, but it's a prophecy that was fulfilled historically. And you can argue that that king of the north was a type of this Antichrist biblically. But the title, "The Desire of Women," is a title. It's not a thing biblically. It was actually a title of the Messiah in the Zodiac, the Hebrew Mazeroth. And what it was saying is that that individual did not regard the Messiah. It wasn't saying he was a homosexual. And in the same verse, it goes on to say that he regards the god of fortresses or forces or munitions. The Hebrew can be translated all of those ways. So, it's someone who regards warfare, in other words, and weapons, and does not care about the Messiah. And the same passage says, "Neither does he regard any god," when it goes on to say, "but he regards the god of fortresses or munitions." I'm paraphrasing. We'll go read the exact text here shortly, but what we're talking about is someone who has a military mindset, who is a pagan, ostensibly, certainly not a servant of the God of Israel, and who rejects both the Messiah and the God of heaven, the real God, and treats weaponry and warfare as his God, in a manner of speaking. That's the real meaning of the passage. It's not saying anything about homosexuality. Now, with that being said, the individual we're going to talk about is a known bisexual. Was caught in the act engaging in sodomy multiple times, including by his wife in the past, who's now deceased. Now deceased, pardon me. Obviously, then Prince Charles, now King Charles III, who is still the 21st Prince of Wales, by the way, forever. That doesn't change when he's king. He's just got more titles, additional heraldic achievements, but he still has all the original stuff before he became king as well. So, that's your first question. The second one about being very popular, there's nothing in scripture about that. What it does tell us in this particular chapter, as well as Daniel chapter 7, and we'll go look at that, is that all the world will wander after him after he recovers from what is ostensibly a fatal wound. The scripture here in Revelation 13, literally in the Greek text, indicates that it's a wound to the death. And it says, "by a sword," so by a weapon. In other words, maybe a literal sword, but certainly by a weapon. And, uh, it'll be a wound from which the world would expect this beast, this first beast, to die. But somehow he recovers from it in a way that the world views it as miraculous or whatever. Time will tell, but the world will begin to follow after him at large and worship him and the devil also simultaneously. And then he gains control over a global government. So, these are things that transpire in the middle of Daniel's 70th period of seven years. Uh, the wound does, and the recovery does, and then he gets possessed by the devil. So, he literally becomes merged with the devil at that point and begins his control of global government. Uh, so those are future things. There's nothing in scripture that says he has to be popular to achieve all that. And we'll come back to this. But I, I will point out that around the time that Charles, and we're talking about King Charles III now, married Diana, who is the one who caught him, by the way, in homosexual acts in the past, uh, and others have talked about that. You can find all sorts of stuff online about that if you research it. But, uh, at any rate, uh, about that time, he was hailed, you know, by magazines like People magazine or, you know, whatever magazine, all over the world, multiple magazines, multiple news sources, as the most eligible bachelor in the world. Yeah, Nixon, or former President Nixon, had hoped that one of his relatives would end up marrying the Prince of Wales, Charles, way back when. So, he was, he was viewed as studly, a man's man, you know, and he was practically trained almost as a commando. You know, there's a lot of people that, a lot of things people don't know about Charles, and we can come back to that, but, uh, he certainly fits the bill biblically. There's nothing in scripture about his age. There's nothing in the scripture about him being handsome. And if we want to talk about somebody who represents the devil, you know, ugliness and evil, why not have somebody who's old and ugly, old and ugly, you know, at this point, instead of young and virile like Christ? Why not? There's no reason it can't be true biblically. But we'll come back to the scriptures. I'll go, and we'll, we'll read them directly after I make my points here from verse 18 of Revelation 13. >> All right. So, the first point I was making is that, uh, the imagery of this first beast has to be associated with the individual in question before we can legitimately attempt to do the name calculation. The second point is that it says it's the number of the man. So, we know that that chimeric hybrid is not, you know, per se, a bio-engineered creature or something like that. It's symbolism associated with a human being. Tells us it's the number of it. Tells us it's the number of man. The third point is it says his number is 666. Right? Well, very few people bother to look at the Greek text from which this number is translated as 666. And in the original Greek text, and I will just, uh, show that right after this, the number is specified with three Greek letters. It's not written in the form of words. It's one of only a couple numbers that I know of in the New Testament, both in the book of Revelation. In this case, they're not written in the form of Greek words. Ordinarily, the numbers are written with words. In this case, because of the manner in which it's specified with three Greek letters, one for 600, one for 60, a third for six, it actually identifies the system for the calculation. And we know scholars know historically that that system was transferred sequentially from Hebrew, the ancient Hebrew numbering system, to the Greek language. So, it was not transferred, uh, phonetically, but rather sequentially. And then, because Hebrew only has 22 hieroglyphs, characters in the language, it can only cover 1 through 90. So, it goes 1, 2, 3 up through nine. Then 10, 20, 30, 40 up through 90. And then 100, 200, 300, 400. At that point, the Hebrew system cuts off because there are only 22 characters in Hebrew. Greek has more characters than that, and even more than English. And so they expanded it in Greek to include 500, 600 up through 900. And it's the Greek version of the system used to specify the numbers. So, I go into that in detail in the book. And let me just show some of those things now, and then I'll come back to the final point on this verse. So, let me stop sharing this window, and I'll share the actual calculation itself for a moment, and the symbolism. Sorry, let me, uh, get something. >> Take your time. >> Okay. Thank you. Okay. All right. Are you seeing a page from the first edition of The Antichrist, the name calculation? >> Yep, I see it. >> All right. So, let me show the Greek for a moment. Uh, that's this. Do you see the Greek? I see it. >> Okay. So, this one, this letter that I'm circling is 600. The middle one is six. Uh, 60, pardon me. The third one is six. That's what's actually written in the Textus Receptus, the received text of the New Testament for the book of Revelation, Revelation 13:18. It's not written in the form of Greek words. So, it identifies the system for us. Now, here, pardon me, let me see if I can get back to it here. Here is the system itself, showing the Greek right here. Right? It's a sequential system. So, in the middle is the original Hebrew system. And what you're looking at when you see two Hebrew letters side by side is the, the normal form of the character, the hieroglyph, and then the final form, which is the same letter in Hebrew, just shaped a bit differently. It's pronounced the same way. It's, uh, written a little differently. And what you see in the second half, or the second column, I guess, of that middle row, or I'm not speaking clearly, but anyway, in that middle row, when you see two characters side by side, the one that's to the right is the final character, but it is not a different sequence. It's not uppercase or lowercase. It's just the final form of the character. That's not the case with Greek, and that's why I'm pointing this out. And it's not the case with English either. So, if we do capital A or lowercase A, capital B or lowercase B, the sequence of the letters does not change in English. And likewise in Hebrew, the sequence doesn't change, but it does cut off at 400 in Hebrew. And so, if we stick with just the Hebrew numbers, we get zero null values, you know, beyond 400. If we go with the Greek, which was used to specify the 666 in the New Testament, then we get these other characters here at the end in Greek. But again, sequentially, the problem that we run into with Greek, and we literally cannot use Greek as a language to do name calculations, even though it's used to specify the number in the system, and I think God did that intentionally because he wanted us to look at other languages for this, uh, but with a system applied sequentially. The reason we can't use Greek is if you go with an upper or lowercase character in Greek, the sequence of the numbers is not the same. The letters is not the same. So, if I simply change the capitalization, like mixed case within Greek, like Prince Charles of Wales, if I go all lowercase, or I go all uppercase, or I go just the first characters of each, uh, word in that title as uppercase, the values are different each time in the calculation. For that reason, that's not the situation with other Latin languages, nor is it the situation with Hebrew. And as it turns out, the exact title in English, Charles, Prince of Wales, calculates to exactly 666 on this system, which I'm showing right here. I'm circling it with a mouse, if you can see it. >> And I'll show another chart that's a little easier to see. And then the exact same title. It's also Charles, Prince of Wales, but it's pronounced Nasik Charles Mavoyes in Hebrew. Nasik is for a royal ruler, a prince or a king. Normally a prince, but can be a king, but a royal individual who's in line to be on a throne or is on a throne. Nasik Charles transliterated in modern Hebrew for Charles. Me ma for of in Hebrew, and Wales transliterated for Wales. This is the normal Israeli spelling of Charles, Prince of Wales. It's the most compact, most formal form. And it, title, this title, same title, calculates exactly 666 in Hebrew as well, on the original system. That alone is mathematically impossible. It's a very strong indicator that Charles is the Antichrist. But again, it has to be in the context of that imagery, which I haven't shown yet, right? Okay, >> which I'll come to. So, here's the same two titles, Prince Charles of Wales. Charles, Prince of Wales, doesn't matter how you order it in terms of the words. And Nasik Charles of Wales. Both 666 with a Hebrew over here, cutting off at 400 and showing W through Z as null if we go with the original system only. So, again, mathematically impossible. Now, let's look at the imagery itself. And then I'll come to Daniel chapter 7 when I show a couple things here on the imagery, because I'm sure people are very much wanting to see this already. Are you seeing the heraldic achievement on the cover of The Antichrist and a Cup of Tea? Okay, >> folks, just you're aware, the second edition is subtitled Charles, Prince of Wales. >> The first edition, and this is a low-resolution version of the cover of the first edition right here, lacks that subtitle. It's the exact same coat of arms for Charles as Prince of Wales, given to him in 1969, first presented to the world at that time when he was, uh, coronated, invested Prince of Wales. He was created Prince of Wales in 1958 by his mother, and in July 1969, he had a formal investiture at Caernarfon Castle in Wales. So, I'll point out a few things about this. The first is, you have the beast with feet like a bear, body like a leopard, mouth like a lion on this heraldic achievement. That's unique in all history to Charles. Normally, it's a regular lion for England here in a royal heraldic achievement for England, uh, like for a queen or a king or Prince of Wales for that matter. But it's normally just a lion, or a lion with a slender body, lion leopard, but not with these exaggerated feet like the feet of a bear. And again, it's "like, like, like." Folks, I will point out, and I'll show it, uh, if we get to it, but, and I do show it inside the second edition of the book, which I'm sorry, I go backwards with these, uh, arrows at times. This is the second edition. Um, I do show in this edition the graven versions that look like cast iron, but they were made of plaster and painted to look like cast iron, that were hung over the entrances, uh, some of the entrances to Caernarfon Castle for the July 1969 investiture on those. This beast actually had the claws of a bear, the actual feet of a bear. This beast did, even to the point of hair that were, you know, on the, uh, the legs here that resembled that of a bear, like you'd see on a bear, as opposed to a lion or a leopard. Very obvious, uh, as I show in the second edition of the book. Now, the reason I wanted to show this here before going to Daniel chapter 7, and do note that the red dragon is here, right? So, it says that this dragon gives him his power, throne, and great authority. And in Revelation 12, this represents the devil himself. This was adopted in 1953 as a national symbol of Wales, but it's been used, you know, in Wales and then Britannia for thousands of years, going back actually to the Roman courts that occupied ancient Britannia a long time ago, and before that, to those Roman cohorts that cohorts that occupied ancient Judea. It was on their, their flags, whistling banners is what they really were, but it became this red dragon historically. And in 1953, this was adopted as the national symbol of Wales. 1958, Charles' mother said that she would create Charles, Prince of Wales, or Prince of the Red Dragon. 1969, he was facing this red dragon and it surrounded him when he was crowned, coronated Prince of Wales, and invested Prince of Wales. Now, the motto here, I want to point out something here. This is the badge of the Black Prince beneath this lion, leopard, bear beast. This is worn on the gold signet ring that Charles has had on a pinky finger on one of his hands since before he met Princess Diana and before her death. And he also wore it when he was crowned king in 2023. Worn it the entire time. You never see him without it. >> What does that mean, Black Prince? Well, originally it was a symbol associated with the founding Prince of Wales of the Order of the Garter, which is what you see here surrounding the royal shield and the shield of oil in the center of this heraldic achievement. This, this is a belt or guarder for the Order of the Garter, which is the oldest continually existing order of knighthood in the world, chivalry in the world to this day. Founded in 1348 by the Prince of Wales of the day and the king of England of the day. And there's a lot to be said about this. Uh, we may get to some of that, but they are over all the occult stuff throughout the world on the basis of the Order of the Garter and some of the order, other orders of knighthood. But this is the most prominent one. And Edward the Black Prince, that's what he was known as, the founding Prince of Wales of the Order of the Garter in 1348. He was known as the Black Prince because he dressed in black and was ostensibly, allegedly, a feared military commander throughout Europe at that time. And this was his symbol with these ostrich feathers shaped like vavs. And in Hebrew, I showed that gamatria for the Hebrew language there. >> Mhm. >> Vav is number six. And it's shaped exactly like these ostrich feathers here. So, this is 666 >> is what it's representing. But this is the badge of the Black Prince, or the Prince of Darkness, because he was not a negro. >> What about this right here? The M on that dragon? Is that an M or is that what is that on the neck of the dragon? >> It's not. It's not. So, I'll explain exactly what that is in a moment. >> Okay. >> But this motto here is "Ich dien." You know, it can be Welsh for "your man" or German for "I serve." In between these two words is the shield of the Black Prince, the same founding Prince of Wales, the Order of the Garter. And it's got 15 gold bees and coins. That's what these are meant to represent for the crusader knights that captured ancient Jerusalem from the Muslims. One of whom was Godfrey of Bouillon, who took the crusader title King of Jerusalem for himself when they captured Jerusalem from the Muslims. So, what it says is, "I, the Black Prince, serve," or "I, the Black Prince, serve Satan, the Red Dragon." You literally read this from left to right, and that's how it's meant to be read formally in heraldry. It's literally telling us that this Charles, Prince of Wales, serves Satan. And he's worn this "I serve" badge of the Black Prince on his pinky finger forever, practically, for a long, long time, most of his adult life. And, um, now, this right here, this unicorn, this chain that you see around the neck of the unicorn right here, and bound to what's called this compartment right here. You'll notice the red dragon is not touching the compartment here. And this is meant to represent like a little island with the dragon ascending out of the sea. That's the symbolism here, you know, where the dragon is standing on a grassy mountain in Wales. But it's representing the dragon meant to represent the dragon coming out of the sea, in a manner of speaking. And Caernarfon Castle, where Charles is invested, literally sits, uh, in a port, you know, on a port, so right next to the sea, literally. And, uh, I mention all this because it's very significant. We're going to come back to this imagery in a moment. But this chain in heraldry is officially called a restrainer. The very language of 2 Thessalonians chapter 2. In other words, on that son of perdition who is restrained until it's time for him to be exposed globally when he's possessed by the devil. And we'll come to that passage, but this is called a restrainer. You'll notice this unicorn does not look deathly and not particularly evil either for its demeanor. And you'll notice that its hoof is touching this compartment, right? Whereas the red dragon is not. And in heraldry, because this chain is bound right here to the compartment, it's literally called restrained or bound. That's formal language for the heraldist. So, why do I point all that out? Judas Iscariot was the son of perdition originally in scripture, right? And when you look in the New Testament, there's a passage where it says that of Judas, it's quoting a psalm in the Old Testament where it says, "He has lifted his heel against the Lord." Does that sound familiar to you? Yeah. >> Speaking of Judas as the son of perdition, lifted his heel against the Lord. Well, if you look at the Hebrew text that the New Testament is quoting of Judas, the son of perdition, it doesn't say heel in the Hebrew. It says hoof. "He's lifted his hoof against the Lord." Here's why I point all that out. There is an unofficial version of this heraldic achievement inside the book that I show that is actually semi-official. It's the most formal version apart from this one that you're looking at. And there are some specific changes to it. One is that the dragon is touching this compartment. Another is that this hoof is lifted off of the compartment. Another is that the unicorn is rearing back and looks like it's dying. It's deathly, evil, and deathly. Another is that the chain is unbound. It's loosed from the compartment. In both cases, the unicorn has human eyes. These are not the normal round eyes without a visible eye sclera that you would see on a horse, for example. These are human eyes on this unicorn, which is not historically completely unique, but it is unusual in heraldry. This beast over here is completely unique historically in heraldry. His own sons don't have it. They'll never have it. They don't have the red dragon. They never will. This is unique under international law, combination of symbols to Charles as the 21st Prince of Wales. Why I mention all of this is that the four horsemen of the Apocalypse, that word for horse in Revelation chapter 6 can be translated as an ordinary horse. It can be translated as a unicorn, which is a horselike body for for a creature, and as a Pegasus. All three of those qualify under that Greek word that's translated as horse in Revelation 6. This unicorn looks kind of pale gray right here, doesn't it? >> The reason it does is because it's printed in CMYK color, cyan, magenta, yellow, and key. What you'd see on the normal cover of a book cover, like a paperback book. I juxtaposed it with, uh, this one intentionally for the audience. This is the exact same image, the same file, but what I've done is I've shown it as RGB color spectrum instead of CMYK right here, because RGB represents more of the colors in the original image. And you'll note here that this unicorn looks like it's pale gray green. You see the greenish hue? >> Mhm. >> In other words, it's the color of rotting human flesh. The reason that's so significant is the fourth horseman of the Apocalypse, and that's who we're actually talking about, the one who's going to be over global government, the one whose name will be Death when he's possessed by the devil. You know, 1 Corinthians, uh, 1 Corinthians 15, I want to say it's chapter 15, but whichever chapter it is in 1 Corinthians refers to the devil as the last enemy who will be defeated and swallowed up and calls the devil Death with a capital D, you know, in 1 Corinthians. And then in Revelation chapter 6, it goes on to tell us that the fourth horseman of the Apocalypse is also named Death. In other words, will be possessed by the devil. So, we'll come to all these passages, but I went to pains to point all this out because the unicorn in heraldry is called "a little horn of the eyes of man." That's the imagery of Daniel chapter 7. So, in Revelation 13, this first beast, this beast with feet like a bear, body like a leopard, mouth like a lion, gains control for three and a half years, a time, times, and a half a time, over mankind, authority over all tribes, tongues, and nations, meaning the whole world. But in Daniel chapter 7, the exact same individual is represented with completely different imagery. The same one who's going to rule over a global government for three and a half years. And there, in that chapter, he's called the "little horn of the eyes of a man." Why is that? Because in reality, he has the whole combination of imagery when the time comes for all this to be fulfilled. And in ancient Babylonia, as well as ancient Assyria, they would have religious seals that were used. And on those seals, they would have the lion representing the sun, the unicorn representing, and it was originally the bull, the oryx bull, you know, from a side profile. So, it came to look like a unicorn. They'd have them facing each other often on a round seal. And then sometimes they add the serpent, the dragon, to the same seals. In other words, the same combination of imagery. Very similar, but it would be a normal lion on those. And anyway, British Royal Coats of Arms got the same pattern from the ancient Assyrian and Babylonian religious seals. And that's what I've documented also in this book. So, now let's take a look at scripture itself on these passages that I've been citing, and that you asked me about originally, uh, that I mentioned in Daniel chapter 11. So, let me, um, pull up scripture itself here and share that. Okay. So, we're here in Revelation 13, right? Mhm. >> The last point I want to make on this, and then we'll go to Daniel chapter 7, etc., on verse 18, uh, it tells us, "Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate." So, that word "let" means permit, allow. In other words, don't, don't impede it. Don't interfere with it. Don't gain it, right? Don't contradict it, you know, when the time comes for the real name calculation. But what this means as well is the person who does this for the real Antichrist has wisdom, knowledge, and understanding biblically, per scripture itself. And it also is telling us somebody will do this before all of this is fulfilled, you know, before Armageddon, before the Great Tribulation, etc. Someone will do this. So, those who are out there claiming that we can't know who the Antichrist is ahead of time, or the church won't be here, or those kinds of things, are not well-grounded in scripture and prophecy. Scripture is explicitly telling us, based on commanding that this calculation be done when the time comes in history for it, that that somebody will know, and that furthermore, they'll make it known. It's implied that they'll make it known to the church, you know, to the saints of God around the world, uh, ostensibly. Okay. So, with that said, if people want to go and look here, they'll find, uh, for example, that this individual gains authority over all the world, you know, after he recovers from a wound. So, Yeah. So, for example, verse 8, "And all who dwell on the earth will worship him," right? And before that, it talks about the mortal wound and his recovery from it, and then the nations beginning to follow after him. Now, that's in Revelation chapter 13. So, let's look at Daniel chapter 7 for a moment. There are two little horns. This is another point I want to make to you, uh, John, and your audience. When you asked me about that passage on "not regarding the desire of women," that's Daniel chapter 11. And another passage that goes with Daniel chapter 11 is Daniel chapter 8. In that book, Daniel chapter 8 is also talking about a little horn, but that little horn does not have the eyes of a man. It's a different little horn, in other words. And that same little horn is also being addressed as the king of the north in Daniel chapter 11, who was a type of this Antichrist to come. You know, as I mentioned earlier, we'll come to the passage here shortly, but people get confused and they think, well, that's the Antichrist. It's the same little horn. It isn't. It's someone who lived historically, who had a major role in Israel historically, against Israel, already fulfilled historically in the time of the Maccabees. But there is another little horn to come who has the eyes of a man, and that is here in Daniel chapter 7. So, if we just, uh, search for the word "eyes" for example, here. Well, sorry for that noise there. Um, you'll see here, "In this horn were eyes like the eyes of a man, and a mouth speaking pompous words." Right? >> Mhm. >> But it also tells us in this same chapter that he comes up among ten horns, plucks up three by the roots, right? >> Mhm. >> And people look at that and they think, well, okay, he's going to conquer three, or he's going to kill three. That's what they presume. But actually, that's not what actually occurs. So, for example, it is talking about the 10 kings that are going to be under the Antichrist that are referenced in Revelation 17, Revelation 18, Revelation 13, other passages of scripture, the 10 toes on the statue of Nebuchadnezzar's vision. But the first point is, at the very end of the tribulation week, when Mystery Babylon, that city that rules over the kings of the earth under the Antichrist, is destroyed, burned with fire, there are still 10 kings. So, I point that out to say that those three that are plucked up by the roots, they don't go away. They're still present all the way to the end. So, in what fashion are they plucked up by the roots? So, let me just digress here for a moment, John, and I'm going to come back to the imagery on the heraldic achievement, uh, because, um, you had asked me about that symbol around the neck of the dragon. I noticed they all had the symbol of the lion and the unicorn, and all of them had this, that symbol. >> Yes. >> Yeah. >> So, let me share that imagery again and explain it, because I was just talking about the 10 horns, right, that are plucked up by the roots, >> right? >> So, you asked me if this was an upside down M or W. I forget exactly how you put it, but, uh, but I can enlarge this here. So, what it looks like is three horns plucked up by the roots, doesn't it? Inverted. >> Mhm. >> You know, on a band around the neck of the red dragon, but it is also around the neck of the lion, leopard, bear beast right here. It is around the neck of the unicorn. Right here. It is around the neck of the lion, leopard, bear beast. Here also, these are the same beasts, just two copies in a manner of speaking on the heraldic achievement, where the feet are more obvious on this one over here. And then it's in one other place, which is around the neck of the overall heraldic achievement, beneath this gold helm, which is known as the sovereign helm in heraldry. So, Charles, from July 1969, was given the same helm as his mother, who was queen. I'm not sure that's ever happened before, but that's highly unusual. It's an aberration in heraldry, but this was formally done by the College of Heralds and the, the top herald, the Garter Herald King, who controlled the creation of this heraldic achievement. And they were the most powerful body of heralds in the world, and they still are to this day. But, so, I'll make a couple of points. The word in Hebrew, as well as in the Greek, the two different words for horn, both refer to horns that can be conical, like you see here on the top of the head of the unicorn, or shaped like an elephant's tusk, like you see here across the sovereign helm. And in heraldry, the sovereign helm has seven bars. Okay? The number of bars tells you what kind of helm it is in heraldry. These three horns, and I'll call them horns plucked up by the roots, are actually the label of the eldest son in heraldry. That's what they represent. So, in other words, every beast that specifically has this label around its neck represents Charles himself. Literally, it's meant to say that this is Charles. So, the little horn of the eyes of man, this unicorn of human eyes, is Charles. This beast with feet like a bear, body like a leopard, mouth like a lion, is Charles. The devil himself is to become Charles. It's telling us that the devil is going to possess Charles. And I pointed out that in the other version inside the book that I show, where the chain is loosed and the unicorn rears back and the hoof is lifted, so that he becomes the second son of perdition of scripture, the dragon is touching this compartment. It's signifying the devil reaching out to then possess Charles as the little horn of the eyes of man. That's what it's symbolically actually representing literally on that heraldic achievement. But then here's the big deal right here. If you look at the center of this, there are 10 horns. By the way, this is shaped like a chemistry flask or vial. If you flip it upside down, these three that I call plucked up by the roots, right? >> That's the third form of a horn for the Greek and the Hebrew. So, this elephant tusk shape is a horn for both Greek and Hebrew. This conical shape is a horn for both Greek and Hebrew. This, this vial or chemistry flask, chemistry vial, all shaped, say, shaped, uh, set of three of them, you know, that are inverted, also are horns biblically, you know, for the same Greek and Hebrew words. So, what we're looking at, because this is the overall head of the heraldic achievement, so this overall thing is viewed as a corporate beast in heraldry, metaphysically, you know, as if it were alive and looking at you. The heraldists are Satanists, and they are occultists, and to them, this is a form of occult artwork that takes on a life of its own spiritually. It represents spiritual reality to them when they put this kind of thing together. It's not just symbolism, in other words, from their perspective. And so, what this is in the overall heraldic achievement, the corporate head of the overall achievement, where this gold helm is the sovereign helm, saying that Charles was the sovereign, not only his mother, or perhaps not even his mother, from July 1969, even though he was just Prince of Wales at that time. But this is 10 horns, three of which are plucked up by the roots. That's what it's symbolizing. Seven here, three plucked up by the roots, and then a little horn of the eyes of a man that comes up among them in Daniel chapter 7. >> Wow. >> That's what it's representing. Now, who are these 10 kings? So, I pointed out in both editions of The Antichrist Napeti that for a long time, even back to the 1980s and earlier, they've been talking about expanding the United Nations Security Council to 10 permanent members or more. But they usually come back to

This idea of 10 permanent members. Currently, there are five who have veto rights who are always on the count council. And then there are 10 more that rotate on and off the council for a total of 15 currently.

Well, they decided uh a few years ago, I think it was actually in it was either 2022 or 2023, I forget, formally all the nations of the world agreed that they are going to reform the United Nations, that they are going to expand the security council to have additional permanent members. They have not announced who those additional members are yet, but they always every few years come back to this idea of expanding it to 10 permanent members.

You find official releases from the United Nations itself on that as news pieces. In other words, news news snippets from the UN. And they've stated over the years, you know, who two of the new permanent members will be. And those will be Germany and Japan. The other three are being debated primarily between Brazil, India, Mexico, India, excuse me, Brazil, India, Mexico, Italy, and Egypt. Those are the five other candidates to make up the additional three of the new five when the time comes.

If they go to 10 permanent members, three of the 10, if they do that, would be from the European Union. Those would be Germany, France, and England. Charles is on record of saying that he wants to be king of the European Union, not King of England or King of the Commonwealth or King of the United Kingdom only. Since shortly after his investature in July 1969, he explicitly stated publicly he wanted to be king of Europe. He also stated that he wanted a global commonwealth when he visited the United States, not just a British Commonwealth under himself.

And uh when we talk about all that, if they expand this to 10 permanent members and for example the European Union adopts a monarchy, well that would be the British monarchy because the British monarchy is the monarchy historically of Germany, France and England and also by the way today of Russia, Spain, other nations over the monarchy of Spain. in fact over the monarchy of Japan where they worship their monarch as if he were a god. You know those other monarchs are knights in the order of the guard under Charles for example.

>> They're his knights.

>> Did you happen to see this statue? I'm going to I don't know if you can see this or not on my camera here, but um it was given to Brazil and it's on the COP 30 the UN um I say habitat but it's not that the um has something to do with the UN but they gave him the statue and the statue if you look at it it's called the guardian spirit dragon. So it's like a mixture of a dragon, a leopard, a lion and it has horns. has horns on its head. It has two horns. On in each horn, it has five horns. So, there's 10 total horns on this picture. And I'll put this picture when I edit this video, but this was given to Brazil just the other day.

>> Was that outside the conference for COP 30?

>> Yeah, outside. Yep. It's like a half body there. It only is like from the waist up, but it's like a leopard, dragon, lion, tenhorned creature. I don't remember the 10 horns on it, but I I believe I saw it. If it's the same one.

>> Yeah, this is probably the same one. Count the horns. It's I was like, I got to count the horns on this because there's horns and then there's horns coming off the horns on each one. Each horn has five horns total. So,

>> it's like

>> Yeah, it was it was meant as a partial representation of the baffiment also.

>> Wow.

>> And uh and we can come back to that. That's directly associated with Charles as well at this point. But uh yeah, the whole climate agenda has been under Charles uh for several decades including going back to the rare earth summit where he was globally credited for the success of the rare earth summit. Charles personally was including by Al Gore who credited Charles personally for the success of that summit and that is the reason that uh the state of Token in central Brazil uh commissioned a statue to Charles portraying him as Zeus or Jupiter with the inscription savior of the world on it calling him the environmental savior of the world and all the cop agreements that have come go back to the Kyoto uh protocol and that agreement in Kyoto Japan which itself goes back to the real earth summit So every COP thing that has ever happened in relation to the climate has been directly under Charles whether he attends or not.

And COP 16 out of which Trump just pulled the United States again for the second time had the largest international gathering of global leadership in the history of the world at one time in one place ever even to this day. It had 150 plus heads of state, 190 plus world leaders at that event and it was hosted in Paris, France and you would have thought for that reason that it would have been uh French the French president who would have opened it or who would have you know given the first speech right and hosted it or maybe Barack Obama who was there because he was the the president of the most powerful nation on earth at that time or maybe Al Gore as people tend to think of him as the public face of the climate scam you know the global warming scam. You would have thought it might have been one of those folks, but actually, and this wasn't the first time this has happened, by the way. It happened before it, it happened after it, but it was actually Charles himself who personally opened it and personally delivered the first speech. And Charles himself who was at the center of the group group photo of all the world leaders in the position of honor. Why would that be on any of those things? And it's because the world leaders know behind the scenes that he's actually over the climate agenda completely.

And today people look at the World Economic Forum, right? You know, and Klaus Schwab was heading it. He's still over it, but behind the scenes. There's a new CEO in a matter of speaking, the chairman of Black Rock for the World Economic Forum, but Klaus Schwab was the founder of the WF. and he founded it right after Charles Investiture in July 1969 as Prince of Wales when this heraldic achievement that's on the screen was first seen by the world and by the way folks that was the most widely viewed event in the history of the world at the time rivaled only by the uh by the US moon landing the Apollo moon landing the same month for the first landing on the moon of a man so 500 million plus for the estimated television audience for Charles investiture in July 1969 at any Right.

Clash Schwab was is I shouldn't say was he's not dead. He is one of Charles Knights. A lot of people don't know that Charles himself has always been over Clash Schwab. Schwab reports to Charles. The agendas of the World Economic Forum in which much of world leadership participates even now are under Charles. Always have been. And that's still true.

Black Rock, State Street, and Vanguard. I'm sure you know those names. Those are three of the most powerful economic entities on earth. Apart from the Bank of England and the Bank of International Settlements, the modern banking establishment goes back to the BIS and then from there the Bank of England which is the first formal bank in our modern western uh format in the world. Those are all under the British monarch and the crown. They always have been. So for example uh Vanguard which is the crown has the controlling interest in Vanguard. A lot of people don't know that Vanguard has the controlling interest in Black Rock and State Street both you know and in terms of wealth the British Commonwealth all those nations that recognize Charles as their king formerly. So not just associate members of the Commonwealth, right? There are more than a dozen nations that formerly represent Charles as their king. You know, they have a monarchy form of government like England does, like the United Kingdom does. Those nations, all their land, their territory, their assets, everything literally belongs to the crown formally, technically. In other words, the crown technically has more wealth than all the trillionaires and all the billionaires of the world combined by a wide margin. And a lot of people don't know that whether the crown could ever avail itself of that or not. And of course, Charles now is the crown. Right? So that's just the beginning of the evidence. There's much much much more in the book, you know, that shows how Charles has been running the world literally even before having a global government. He's been the puppet master behind the scenes like the Oz in the Wizard of Oz. The wizard I should say in the Wizard of Oz, you know, pulling the strings.

So, for example, Bill Gates of Microsoft, fame or infamy, take your take your pick. Fame or infamy is one of Charles Knights. Shimon Peres of Israel, who's now deceased, who got the Oslo process going under Charles, is one of Charles Knights. The entire Middle East peace process traces directly to Charles. So for example, going back all the way to 1987, the London agreement of 1987, which Charles personally brought to pass through a lawyer who worked for both him and Princess Diane at the time, a Lord Victor Mishkan. Charles arranged those meetings through Victor Mishkon between then Jordan's King Hussein the the current king's father who's deceased who was a personal London educated friend of Charles and uh Israel's Shimon Perez who became a knight of Charles after that that led to the Madrid peace conference in Spain which led to the Oslo process afterwards under Yeetsakin and Shimon Perez which led to the uh road map under Quartet. The fourth member of the quartet being the United Nations. So basically all the nations of the world which Tony Blair headed for 10 years a decade after he was prime minister of the UK under Charles and which now has other heads who are also under Charles. They've all always been under Charles. The entire false peace process from start to finish has been under Charles.

Now people will say listening to me right now, well what about the Abraham Accords right with Jared Kushner? What about the 20 point plan under Trump in September of last year with Netanyahu? Right. Well, as a matter of fact, both of those things came via Tony Blair from Charles through Kushner initially, the Abraham Accords, and then Trump. So, when we talk about Kushner, he was meeting publicly uh in the Middle East such as in the UAE or Saudi Arabia, I don't remember which is first. People can go look it up with Tony Blair talking about what became the first Abraham Accord, you know, the the initiative for the Abraham Accords and what led to the first Abraham Accord publicly right there with Tony Blair in the thick of it. So the Abraham Accords actually traced to Tony Blair, not just Jared Kushner under Charles in terms of the 20point plan. So Trump unveiled that on September 18th from the White House of Netanyahu last year, right? Well, what people don't know is that Tony Blair Tony Blair basically gave it to Trump in August of last year at the White House as one of Charles Knights. It's actually under Charles. So you know he has literally been the puppet master on the whole climate scam on the whole East false peace process on many other things.

So for example the United Nations is under Charles under the British monarchy always has been. The League of Nations was under the British monarchy always had been. So the League of Nations came out of Chattam House otherwise known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs after World War I. It was their brainchild, Cadam House's brainchild, otherwise known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London, headed by the British Monarchy. Always was. Now, Cadam House was created for one purpose only originally. Do you know what that is?

>> No,

>> John.

>> No, I have no idea.

>> The only reason it was created was to create a global government under the British monarchy. That was its reason for existence from the start.

Out of World War II and out of the League of Nations came the United Nations. Right.

>> So again, that traces directly to Chattam House and then the British monarchy. Out of World War II, which is upcoming, that's the second seal of the apocalypse, roughly the second year of the seven years. Following that will come global government under the Antichrist, beginning in the middle of the fourth year of the seven years of Daniel 9:27. So in other words, World War II leads to the global government that Chadam House was created from the beginning to bring to pass and it will be under the British monarch or the Prince of Wales of the day or whatever Charles is titling himself at that point. I presume still King Charles III, but he doesn't have to be king. And I want to be clear on that, folks, for any of this to be fulfilled. He could go back to being Prince of Wales if he wanted to seed the throne. He's he is forever the 21st Prince of Wales. And nothing about what I'm saying changes except that he doesn't have the wealth of the crown anymore directly under his authority. That's the only thing that would change. And actually, it doesn't matter whether you would have that or not. It just doesn't matter for purposes of any of this.

So,

>> all right, proceeding now back to scripture. I want to get to the passage that you initially asked me about.

>> All right. Before you go back to that, I got a question for you. I just I'm curious about what what

>> have you received any kind of um I guess letters or resistance from the throne or from England or anything like that because of this research at all.

They will not so much as mentioned my name publicly to date. They've known from the beginning almost since 1998. you know that uh I'm fingering him and he has never once come out to deny a single thing that I have said because the moment he would do anything like that first of all every single thing I say is documented with source material all the references are there in the book you saw the first edition that's true in the second edition as well there's nothing I say that isn't documented with sources that can be verified so none of it is hearsay none of it is speculation it's all hard evidence so he can't actually contradict any of it and get away with it the other problem for him is the moment he would do that, the whole world would know about this book and this evidence. And that's the last thing that he wants and that the devil wants until he's actually already in power, which is still years away. And then it'll be too late to stop him. So, but we do know he'll receive a fatal wound presumably. Yeah. And I say presumably because this is another interesting thing about the passage in Revelation 13. When people write when people read it, it says that one of the heads plural of this beast receives a wound to the death. Isn't that strange language? So that beast has multiple heads and that was another mystery until we could see the ceraldic achievement. How does it have multiple heads and yet it represents a man, right? A human being. So what we see here is multiple heads. It's got the corporate head in the center, for example, the head of the unicorn, the head of the lion leopard bear beast, the head of the red dragon, multiple heads, but they all represent Charles. So when it says one of his heads receives receives a wound of the death, well in the center on the royal shield in the center of this heraldic achievement and I'll just enlarge it for the audience here. Let me let me show it again. So, the center of this there are actually 10 lion leopard bear beasts. Are you still seeing the heraldic achievement?

>> I can see it. Yep.

>> Okay. There are 10 lion leopard bear beasts in the center of this. And I'll just make a square around them. And what you have is six which would normally be for the shield of England. And then this thing here in the center. A lot of people like to say, "Well, William has got that on his coat of arms as Prince of Wales, so he's got the red dragon on his coat of arms." That's what they'll say. But these are clueless people who've done no research, don't know what they're talking about. They're complete noviceses on all of this because what this thing actually is is the red lion of Scotland. It is not a dragon at all. And then these are six lion leopards. normally lions or lion leopards. They represent the offspring of the United Kingdom historically. So you could say loosely New Zealand, Canada, Australia, the United States loosely those nations that came out of the United Kingdom in a manner of speaking historically. Then these other four are the shield of Wales uniquely added for Charles as Prince of Wales and he was invested as Prince of Wales. That's not going to happen it seems for William. So William has only created quote unquote Prince of Wales. He's not going to have a formal investor like Charles. And even if he did, he would never have imagery like this. And then you've got the harp of David, which is the national symbol of Ireland. So in other words, you've got Wales here, England here, Scotland here, and Ireland here, the coronations of the United Kingdom and their offspring. But you have actually 10 lion leopard bears. And so I actually show that each of these has feet like the feet of the bear. Like the feet of a bear. I show that enlarged inside the book. Yeah. Something that's more detailed than this image right here in alternate versions of it that are also formal versions. So all that is to say um we have the 10 kings. So 10 more heads in a manner of speaking represented here besides the red line of Scotland. Right? So you got all these heads here, but corporately it all represents Charles and his offspring. So I am presuming that the head that will receive the mortal wound and recover you and it does say a wound to the death. So it's not some grazing of an ear, you know, like people have tried to point to to President Trump, for example. It's not a wound that wouldn't actually kill somebody. It's a wound that people would expect to actually kill somebody, you know, when it comes, when it happens. So that the world is shocked, surprised, whatever, you know, beside themselves, whatever. So that they literally start to follow after Charles as the antichrist and worship him and the devil possessing him at the time subsequently. It's a much more serious kind of wound, in other words, than what President Trump received. Right?

>> So all right, now to the scripture. So let me stop sharing that and Let's look at um Daniel. Okay, let me let me me share again here. Let's go on to Daniel chapter 11. The specific thing you asked me about. So I want to point out folks, this little horn of the eyes of man is addressed in Daniel chapter 7 and Daniel chapter 9 and not the entire chapters, just portions of them. Whereas the other little horn in Daniel who was a type of this little horn in the eyes of man but not actually this little horn in the eyes of man is addressed in Daniel's chapter 8 and 11 the king of the north. So we're going to look at the king of the north in this case in Daniel 11 and the specific verse about which uh you asked me John for the sake of the audience. Okay. Which is somewhere in here. Okay. Verse 37. Daniel 11:37.

Now, I want to say something else for the sake of the audience. uh verses 35 and arguably you could even go back to verse 30 right here all the way through verse 39 which have been fulfilled historically under uh the king of the north that I'm going to address can be fulfilled again uh under another king of the north potentially even Charles is the antichrist so he actually descends from the solucid rulers. These kings of the north genealologically Charles does. So this king of the north I'm talking about this elucid ruler was known as Antiochus IV who gave himself the title Epiphanies the great you know as if he were a god. He is the one who desecrated the temple in 2nd century BC in Israel. Sacrificed a pig on the altar and set up an idol to to uh Zeus which the Roman equivalent was Jupiter. the head god of their pantheon of gods, their false god on Mount Olympus, right?

>> And typically those idols were either completely naked, yeah, for for Zeus or Jupiter, or dressed only in a loin cloth. And then they would have a bird of prey like a vulture or an eagle next to them. The Romans would often use the eagle, and the idol for Zeus or Jupiter would have their hand resting on that bird or touching it. At other times, Zeus or Jupiter would instead of having that bird of prey next to them, actually be portrayed with outspread wings and completely naked or dressed only in a loin cloth. Historically, it was an idol like that that Antiochus placed on the the uh inside the Holy of Holies, you know, after sacrificing a pig on the altar or simultaneous to it, desecrating the temple, you know, in the time of the Mcabes. And that is part of what is being addressed right here.

So speaking of that king of the north in Taius IV where this was fulfilled historically says he shall regard neither the god and in Hebrew this is Elohim which is the plural form of the word. So in Hebrew you have L for God singular and really it's the word for judge. In Hebrew it's literally translated as judge. And depending on if you're talking about God, the ultimate judge, the creator of the universe, you cap you might translate it with a capital J, you know, is like the judge or you might translate it with a capital G singular for the God, right? The only God, the only the only judge of the universe. And when it's in its plural form, you could translate it as judge as plural with a lowercase J, like human judges, you know, under God carrying out his divine will ostensibly what they're supposed to be doing,

>> right? uh or as the judge, but he's a plurality. And I'll explain that in a moment. You know, Elohim, still translated in English as judge singular or God singular with a capital J or capital G, even though the Hebrew word is plural. And when it's plural, it's actually referring to father, word, and holy spirit. Because God is father, word, and holy spirit. He's one God, but he's a plurality in that sense. Just like you and I are body, soul, and spirit merged as one being. There aren't three of us, but we are body, soul, and spirit in a similar way. You know, as close as you can make the analogy. God is father, word, and holy spirit. One God, not three. But that's the reason Elohim might be used. And I go into all that because this can be translated gods. It doesn't have to be God right here. Okay?

>> And I think a better translation here would actually be gods. the gods of his fathers, the false gods of his fathers. But even if you want to say it's the god like the god of Israel, the god of the universe, which a pagan, you know, salucid king would not have been worshiping, right? And neither would his fathers. None of Antiochus IV's forefathers worshiped the god of Israel. They were all pagans, every one of them. And um then it goes on to say, "Nor the desire of women." So in other words, the context for saying nor the desire of women here is the rejection of the gods his father his fathers worshiped. Right?

>> So it makes more sense then to say this is referring to the Messiah, the promised seed. Why was the Messiah called the desire of women? Genesis 3:15, the promise to Eve that her seed would crush the seed of the serpent, the devil's seed in the future. That's Genesis 3:15, known as the proto evangelium or the first preaching of the gospel, the proto evangel in scripture. I have an entire book, an entire volume on that one verse and how it sets forth all biblical history and prophecy that followed from the Garden of Eden in just that one verse. A whole book on that. There's a whole lot wrapped up in that biblically. But this is referring to the promised seed because since that promise was given to Eve or her posterity and women don't have the seed, the man does. So it's implying in other words intimating a virgin birth also in that prophecy when it says the seed of the woman, the woman's seed. So women knew that somehow that seed would come through a woman in the future, a descendant of Eve. And they desired to be the woman who would give birth to that child. And so the title came the title, the desire of women ended up being part of the zodiac representing the Messiah, that promised seed. So it's saying he doesn't regard the gods of his fathers. Obviously, he doesn't regard the real god, the god of Israel either. And he also does not regard the Messiah. It doesn't have anything to do with homosexuality here whatsoever. But the Greeks were famous for engaging in sodomy, including in their their baths where they would go nude. The men would and their games where they would often participate in their games in the nude. And and Antiochus tried to get Israel's men to further apostatize and also participate in those games nude. and to do all kinds of wickedness that the Greeks did. He tried to force the Greek religion on Israel, ancient Israel, which is part of what the Mcabes rebelled against. And then it goes on to say, "Nor regard any god." So again, it's pointing out that this thing about not regarding the desire of women is tied to not regarding any god except that, you know, for he shall exalt himself above them all. In other words, he'll make himself like a god in his own eyes just like 2 Thessalonians chapter 2, but this was fulfilled historically already. Okay. But in their place he shall honor a god of fortresses. Now that word fortresses can be forces or munitions or forces, not just fortresses. In other words, it's all the stuff you would connect to the military. weapons. In other words, fortresses, military tents, forces, like soldiers. It's all of that wrapped up in the one Hebrew word. Yeah. So, he's going to honor, in other words, a violent god in a matter of speaking. You could put it another way. He's going to honor the devil who comes to steal, murder, and destroy. Right? That's what the devil does. That's the God that he honors. A god which his fathers did not know. He will honor with gold and silver, with precious stones and pleasant things. So it doesn't mention the statue of the idol right there. But in the parallel passages, you know, it talks about a desolating abomination. And even in this, it talks about I believe in Daniel 11, if I'm not mistaken, about the abomination desolation. Yes, it does. Right there.

>> Right.

>> Yeah. that was actually fulfilled in the 2nd century BC in connection with the Bakabes historically at the midpoint of the week of history roughly in the fourth millennium or fourth day of the week of history and likewise in the fourth year the middle year of Daniel's year of Daniel's week of seven years onto the fourth seal of the apocalypse there'll be another desolating abomination another idol established in a holy place that doesn't yet exist And another abomination that causes desolation, 2 Thessalonians chapter 2. So let's go to that briefly here. So Paul here in this passage, I'll start with uh let's start with let's just read from verse two verse one through uh verse four. Now, brethren, concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering together to him, we ask you not to be soon shaken in mind or troubled either by spirit or by word or by letter, as if from us, as though the day of Christ had come. Now, that day is referred to as the day of Jesus Christ or Christ Jesus, the day of the Lord, the day of Lord's wrath, the day of the Lord's vengeance, the great and terrible day of the Lord. It's called all those things in scripture. And it's the same day. Biblically, that day is the Sabbath millennium, the seventh day, the seventh 10,00ear period of the week of history. Hebrews chapter 4. That's the day that he is talking about the beginning of the millennial kingdom. In other words, the seventh day of the week of history. And that's why in at least three places between the old New Testaments, it says a day with the Lord. This is a thousand years to man and a thousand years to man as a day with the Lord. The day of the Lord that it's talking about here is actually the millennial kingdom itself. So let's proceed with this and I'll put that in context. Let no one deceive you by any means for that uh day will not come. But that day will not come is not in the Greek text. It's just for unless the falling away comes first and the man of sin is revealed. The son of predition who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped so that he sits as God in the temple of God showing himself that he is God. Well, that sounds fairly similar, doesn't it, to what we read there in Daniel 11, except it isn't talking about that solucid king at all. But it is very similar. So we can clearly draw the parallel and the conclusion that that solucid king who was a little horn of Daniel chapter 8 is a type of this little horn of the eyes of a man of Daniel chapter 7, this antichrist. Okay? Mhm.

>> But the first point here is folks that the revelation per what's written here happens before the Lord returns not after. So all the people who are looking at this and saying well hey you know the Lord has to come back before he's revealed are reading this passage inverted exactly wrong. Exactly the opposite of what it literally states. It literally states that the man of sin will be revealed the son of predition. And in this case, I'm going to show that that is Charles, the antichrist, the main one, the top dog antichrist of history, the second son of predition of scripture. That this individual is going to be revealed before the day of Christ has come, before the day of the Lord, before the millennial kingdom comes. And then Paul goes on in verse 5 and says, "Do you not remember that when I was still with you, I told you these things? And now you know what is restraining. Okay, that chain that I mentioned on the heraldic achievement which is called a restrainer literally in heraldry that he may be revealed in his own time. For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work only who he who now restrains. And by the way, this word he in the Greek can also be translated as it. Both translations are correct. Neither is more accurate than the other. So it is both a thing and a person doing the restraining. In other words, the thing is the chain, the restrainer, the symbolism that I showed. He who now restrains will do so until he's taken out of the way. Well, when the time comes for this to be fulfilled and the devil to possess Charles, the uh the chain is loosed on that other version in the heraldic achievement. And that's intentional symbolism by the heraldists to foretell the future. That's what they're trying to do with that imagery without even understanding what they're doing. It's a satanic and occult form of artwork that was satanically motivated when they created it, you know. And then it goes on, "And then the lawless one will re will be revealed whom the Lord will consume with the breath of his mouth and destroy with the brightness of his coming." Now, let me just point out one other thing about this. You've seen the statue to Charles that portrays him as Zeus or Jupiter before. I've shown it to you.

>> I'll show it to the audience here in a moment.

>> That was created years after the first edition of the Antichrist and Cupee was published.

>> It's an example, in other words, of the evidence strengthening after Charles had already been publicly identified with the biblical evidence of Revelation 13, for example, as the top dog Antichrist of history who one day will be over a global government. In other words, the actual idol that is going to go into a newly constructed holy place in the future to fulfill this passage that we've just been reading already exists. It's existed since the early 2000s. And I'm going to show it in just a minute. But what I want to point out here from scripture and mention in connection with that idol is that it has Charles face, right? Mhm.

>> It's portraying Charles himself as Zeus or Jupiter without spread wings dressed only in a loin cloth hovering over a massive human bodies crushing the skulls. In other words, an inversion and perversion of Genesis 3:15.

>> Are you meaning to show the picture right now? Because I don't see all I see is the scripture right now.

>> Yeah, I'm going to show it, but I wanted to make a point here from scripture. So here it says that he sits as God in the temple of God showing himself that he is God. Right? The son of predition. Now just imagine for a moment and it's talking about the devil possessing Charles. That's how he becomes history's second son of predition. The devil possessed Judas at the midpoint of the crucifixion week before he went and betrayed Christ for his crucifixion. He entered Judas and that's when Judas became the son of predition. In the fourth day of the crucifixion week, that's when that happened. Likewise, in the fourth year of the tribulation week, the devil enters Charles and possesses him to become the son of predition. Imagine Charles possessed by the devil and the devil looking out through Charles eyes literally at that idol having Charles face on the temple mount portraying him as Zeus or Jupiter as the devil the head false god of the false pantheon of gods of Mount Olympus right that is how he sits in the temple of God as that idol you know one literal way and shows himself self that he is God. He sees he's showing himself that he is God with that idol in placed wearing his face, Charles face. So let's look at the idol itself now. So here is the idol.

>> Do you see it? Yep.

>> Yep.

>> So, I have not gone to Daniel 9:27, but I addressed the Hebrew text of that verse, which is the same verse, folks, that uh indicates this 7-year period in context preceding Christ's return. And by the way, that can also be the seven seals of the apocalypse in context. And I show in my Messiah history and the tribulation period multi volume series that's coming, which I hope will be published this year, that it's roughly a seal per year from Revelation 6 onward in scripture. Each of those seals summarizes roughly one year of those seven years in sequence. And so it's under the fourth year that this desolating idol to Charles gets put in the holy place. Now, this what you're looking at on your screen is the miniature version that was actually handed to Charles as a gift and photographed by the BBC in the early 2000s and reported on by the British Broadcasting Corporation hailing Charles as quote unquote savior of the world. It actually has the inscription savior of the world on the base of this statue. This is the miniature version. It's a it's u very roughly a foot and a half in height. There's a full-size version of this in a crate from the same artist, Mauricio Bentes, who's now deceased. That's biblically arguably 10 cubits in height. The same height as the angelic statues that went on either s either side of the ark of the covenant in the Holy of Holies in ancient Israel's second temple before it was destroyed.

>> Wow.

>> Readymade. Nobody's ever seen it. Sitting in a crate somewhere from the same artist. reported on in the same articles that reported on this miniature version that you're looking at in the early 2000s just waiting to go into a newly constructed holy place on the Temple Mount. They could put that they could put Charles Heraldic achievement there, plaster it somewhere in the Holy of Holies. They could put a hologram to Charles speaking in the Holy of Holies, right? They could even portray him like this speaking in the Holy of Holies if they wanted, you know, and I'll call it the unholy of holies. A new desecration of the temple that takes what Antiochus IV did in Daniel 11 to a whole new level. In other words, right?

>> So, what you're looking at, folks, is the literal desolating abomination. This is the actual thing. It already exists. It's existed for decades to Charles. It has his face dressed only in a loin cloth without spread wings hovering over a mass of human bodies as if he's the one crushing the heads. Why is that so significant? Because it's portraying him as if he were the promised seed of Genesis 3:15. In other words, it's putting the devil's seed in place of Christ. It doesn't become more Antichrist than that symbolically. It's a complete inversion and perversion of Genesis 3:15. Satanic perversion and inversion. The opposite of the truth. In other words, okay. So, this particular statue and that's let's go to Daniel 9:27 for just a moment is described in the root words of the Hebrew text of Daniel 9:27. Literally, nobody knows that except for me until my book came out. where I go into those Hebrew root words, the 2024 second edition of the Antichrist and Capia. I was not aware of that when the first edition was published. And actually, I couldn't have been anyway because this statue didn't exist in 1998 when the first edition was published.

So, let me now show the scriptures again and let's go to Daniel 9:27. So it's beyond the discussion today, but I will point out that all the weeks of scripture are patterned after the crucifixion week. And the evidence for that is in my coming Messiah history and the tribulation period multi volume series. Do you see these volumes described on your screen, John?

>> Yeah, I see them.

>> Okay. So, for example, this third volume is the book on the proto evangelium, Genesis 3:15 that I mentioned. When we get to the final volume, I showed that all the weeks of scripture are literally patterned after the crucifixion week of Christ with him having died in the middle of the week, the fourth day, not not Thursday or Friday, and having resurrected, risen from the grave, at the very end of the week, at the end of the Sabbath, the end of the seventh day, not Sunday morning, not the first day of the week. He only appeared to the women several hours after his resurrection early on the first day of the week, but he had already risen prior to that and he rose at the end of the crucifixion week. So when you know that I'm able in this harmony of weeks volume, the final volume of this series, which I hope will be published this year, to demonstrate that all the weeks of scripture are patterned after the crucifixion week. Now the reason that is very germanine to the discussion on Daniel 9:27 is that this verse describes the seven years of the tribulation week tribulation week. But many historicists and preacherists have looked at this verse and said, "Well, boy, it sure sounds a lot like the week in which Christ was crucified." Because hey, he was crucified in that week, within that week, maybe in the middle of week, he uh put a stop to sacrifice and offering. He ended the abomination that was his crucifixion. You know, he did all that stuff in that week. So, we think this verse is already fulfilled. It's about the crucifixion week. There's not a future tribulation period or tribulation week or great tribulation. That's a claim that they'll make. not knowing scripture, not actually believing God's written word despite all their protest protestations to the contrary, not realizing that this is literally a seven-year period preceding Armageddon. But there is a correct reason for their confusion and that is that this tribulation week is actually patterned after the crucifixion week beforehand by God. Which is the reason they're able to get away with and indeed have their conflation, their conflation between the weeks, the crucifixion week and this week of seven years. Why they're able to get away with that and and conflate those things to begin with is because all the weeks of scripture are patterned after the crucifixion week. And that includes the seven seals of the apocalypse. That week of seals is patterned after the crucifixion week. So with that being said, when it describes this desolating abomination here in the text in this verse, it's actually in the Hebrew root words uh literally describing that statue to Charles. It's describing a statue, an idol that is dressed only in a loin cloth without spread wings. And then up here at the beginning of the verse where it says, "He shall confirm." That word for confirm is translated as confirm. It's the Hebrew word gabbor, which means to make strong or strengthen. That's the literal translation of it. So by inference or implication to in to enforce to impose to guarantee to force upon. Okay? And by the way folks there's nothing here about this uh concerning peace. It doesn't say that in this verse. It also says nothing about who will sign it.

Now I mentioned um the 20point plan right

>> from Trump and how that actually isn't from Trump. It's really under Charles via Tony Blair, one of Charles Knights. And Trump is playing the the useful idiot in a manner of speaking for Charles in that perhaps not even knowing though. I sent my book, by the way, to President Trump in March of last year. Got an acknowledgement that he received an auto penigned letter. Don't know if he ever opened it or read it or the letter that accompanied it, but I asked him to cancel his upcoming then upcoming second meeting with Charles saying that if he meets with Charles, he's effectively meeting with the devil himself uh with the top dog Antichrist of scripture and history and indeed with the individual who was over all the efforts to prevent Trump from being in office both in 2016 and then 2020 where he succeeded in 2020. That that election was in fact stolen and then again in uh 20 uh 24. So all the bad stuff that Trump has suffered traces directly or indirectly to Charles and I pointed that out in the letter to President Trump, which I don't know that he ever read, but unfortunately.

>> Yeah.

>> At any rate, I mention all that because the name Charles, do you know what the meaning of the name Charles is?

>> I do remember from when you told me last time is it means man, right?

>> No.

>> No. Okay. Maybe I don't remember. It it means strong man,

>> okay?

>> Or warrior by implication. But the word strong is the key portion of its meaning. Okay? So you could say in other words that there's an implication from the use of the word gabbor which means to make strong or strengthen here of the name Charles in this verse as well. But whether one accepts that argument or not and I have documented that the meaning of Charles is strong man or warrior or that kind of thing uh in my book from multiple languages including English the root words historically uh whether you accept that part or not the fact is and I show this in the book from the Hebrew that it's the actual idol to Charles that's being described here an idol without spread wings dressed only in a loin cloth. Interesting.

>> Okay. So, there's a whole bunch of stuff that's happened. There's an awful lot of evidence, folks, in the book that I haven't even touched on in this interview, but after the book came out, other things happened. So, we got um for example, and this I'll backtrack. You know, his crowning is king. I did document that thoroughly in the book. That was just before the book was published and um that was in in May of 2023 and he was actually crowned king of Israel. Most people don't know that but he descends and this is an official claim by the way of the British monarchy. They've made it for more than a century. They claim to sit upon the throne of Israel on King David's throne to be the monarchy of the house of Israel, the royal monarchy. False or not? Now, I believe that's a false claim. They have a lineage that goes back thousands of years to try to show that. And that lineage chart, you know, on which they officially make that claim as well. It's the official lineage chart of Queen Elizabeth II published in London.

That chart is available through Prophecy House with the book The Antichrist for those who want to get it. So people can you can see that you can see it with your own eyes and the chart is also documented in the book.

But Charles descends allegedly from King David. He actually descends from the tribe of Dan historically. He's a Danite. He actually descends. So he is an Israelite through tri through the tribe of Dan. He descends from Muhammad being of that Hashemite lineage, the same lineage as the false prophet of Muhammad, the founder of Islam, who was an Edomite, by the way, which means Charles is also an Edomite ascendant of Esau, Jacob's brother. He descends from ancient pharaohs, from ancient Roman emperors, from ancient Assyrian and Babylonian kings, from ancient Seucid rulers, ancient Ptoomeic rulers, etc. the king of the south, the king of the north. Uh, every royal house of Europe he descends from. He descends from almost any lineage of any consequence in the history of the world that's known including the Maravvenian lineage which is that crusader lineage that goes back to Godfrey Douan that has that king of Jerusalem title that the crusaders took for themselves. Godfrey Duan did when they conquered Jerusalem from the Muslims. So Charles actually has the strongest claim to that title were he to make it entirely apart from everything else I've just said.

So the last thing I'll point out here and then I'll let you ask questions. You can come up for air there John and ask questions. But the last thing I'll point out on this right now is that um through this Maravvenian lineage, Charles and other royal houses of Europe, some others claimed to be a descendant of Jesus. They actually believe that they descend from Jesus, this Frankish king named Maravey, alleging that he was descended either from Mary or Marta, her sister, one of the two, or from his mother being raped by a sea serpent, a red dragon. Those are the mythologies surrounding this Frankish king Maravey and the Maravevenian lineage. None of which are true. But uh on the basis of that lineage and the thought that it could be Christ, the royal houses of Europe have down through the centuries claimed a divine right to rule because they actually think that they're sitting potentially on Christ's throne. And in the case of the British monarchy, it's a formal claim to claim to sit on David's throne even though scripture is clear that it's Christ himself who sits on David's throne. So, it's another example of perverting those two seeds of the proto evangelium, inverting them, right? Claiming that the promised comes from the British monarchy, right? >> Yeah. >> All very satanic at its core. All right. So there's a whole lot more that we can cover including things that happened after his coronation like this the portrait to him his first portrait portraying him as if he were the ruler of hell.

>> And and I'll just show that. Yeah. Let me just show the portrait actually for folks. That came out after the book was published. Right after the book was published actually even before his coronation as king. and uh or no, pardon me, after his coronation is king. I'm getting that backwards, but let me uh go ahead and show that um for everyone to see. Okay. Are you seeing this portrait? >> See it. >> So, this was officially commissioned. Charles was involved with the artist. For example, Charles personally requested the addition of this monarch butterfly over his shoulder. None of this came as a surprise to him and he personally unveiled the portrait with the artist. I believe it was at Buckingham Palace if memory serves. I'll make a few points about this. Uh, first of all, you notice his coloration. His flesh is if it's is it's as if he were rotting like pale green gray, right? >> Yeah. I was >> like death warmed over. >> Yeah. But did you notice the the uh the placement here of his hands? >> That precisely mimics the shroud of Turret. It's intentional and it's meant to suggest death and resurrection just as this butterfly is. Though this also because of things like that monarch TV series which ties in with some of the comics, you know, of ancient kaiju or titans, you know, chimeic hybrids, monsters, dinosaurs, this kind of thing. It's come to have that more modern association, but also it has the historical association of butterflies of death and resurrection. And so there are at least two intimations on this apart from Charles fleshly color of death. He warmed over, you know, of being dead but yet alive, death and resurrection in a matter of speaking where his name is death in the future, right? >> Yeah. Well, something else happened here, which is people realize that if you flip this, are you seeing this? >> Yeah, I see it >> right here. Let me see if I can make it bigger. If you invert the portrait and mirror it, the baffomet shows up in the very center. Here's the baffomet over here seated. >> Yeah. >> Notice the pattern here of the wings, right? So that's right here. It's right here. The pattern of the horns, that's right here. The face right here. The breast because it's a chimeic male female mixture in the satanic portrait right here. And on either side you have Charles looking like he's descending to hell, right? Surrounding this chimeic hybrid of the devil representing the devil. Do you ever wonder why Mel Gibson chose a a female persona for the devil in the last temptation of Christ? >> Yeah, I never really thought about it. >> This is why sexual Satanism. That's what I call this. And it goes back to this Baffomet statute. you know, the whole LGBTQIA plus whatever lunacy movement, particularly so-called transgenders, like the apex predators of sexual satanist where they're trying to mutilate their bodies and actually have a mixture of male and female organs. That goes back to nasticism to a degree. And the, you know, the gnostics, some of them had this notion that Adam was actually before Eve was created was actually a male female mix. And when God made Eve from one of Adam's ribs, he actually separated them into two distinct sexes. >> That prior to that, the first man Adam was a chimeic hybrid like this, a Kimra, you know, male female mix, which is completely false biblically and totally satanic. But in worshiping their father, the devil, these apex predators among sexual satanists are trying to mimic this in their bodies by mutilating themselves whether they realize it or not to appear to be a mixture of male female. They still have their genes of whatever sex they were born with. They can't ever change that. And then they try to make their bodies look like something else. >> It is a form of Satanism. >> Yeah. And here we have that at the center of this official portrait of Charles, a bisexual, a sexual sodomite and whatever else he may be who is close with Jimmy Seville, you know, and another sexual Satanist in the UK. Seville maybe being the most famous sexual predator in the whole history of the United Kingdom, if not the world, is publicly known. One of the worst ever and and not known till after his death publicly. Charles was a close friend of Seville while he was alive. And Seville was one of his knights. A lot of people don't know that. >> He was involved in raping children and pedophilia and all kinds of horrific things. Seville was. >> Yeah. >> And I won't even mention Charles. Lots of people say similar things about him based on alleged evidence, ostensible evidence in Canada and elsewhere and other members of the royal family, too. So people looked at this when it first came out before it was even mirrored, you know, saying, "What is this? Is Charles the ruler of hell?" And others saying, "Was this painted in blood?" And it looks like he's surrounded by fiery red flames, doesn't it? And smoke. >> Yeah. >> You know, and sulfur and ash and whatever. And this was Charles own official first portrait as Monarch unveiled by him. He didn't complain about it. He laughed about it and was pleased with it and is pleased with it. and it's hanging, you know, in the palace. So, you know, what do you say when you see something like that? >> Yeah. I'd say, you know, even opinion of me, I'd say, please send that back. I don't like that. >> Oh, yeah. >> Of course, >> you know, but even the pentagram is hidden here. Even the twisted serpents in a higher resolution, you know, are represented here that you see right here in the center of the baff. All the details are actually present, you know, hidden in this um sorry, even this thing above the center of the head, this torch, this fake light, you know, Lucifer is up here as well. So, all hidden in the shadows and the details of this thing looking like it was painted in blood, looking like death warmed over.

So now let's go back to the scriptures briefly and I'll let you ask questions. Um because there's one other thing I'd like to point out in scripture having shared all that right now and that is the fourth seal of the apocalypse and maybe I'll mention something about the first seal as well and President Trump. So right here, the fourth seal summarizing the fourth year. It says, "When he opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth living creature saying, "Come and see." So I looked and behold a pale horse. That word is chloros in the Greek. And that word for horse can also be a unicorn, as I pointed out earlier, like the little horn of the eyes of a man. And by the way, John, did you know that Charles when he visits the United States, do you know what his u code name is with our secret service? >> No. >> Unicorn. >> That's what they actually call him. >> Wow. >> Okay. So, this word pale should be pale green gray. That's the literal meaning of chloros in the Greek or the color of rotting human flesh, which is the actual color of that unicorn. But it is also his color here on the portrait. Right? And it goes on to say the name of him who sat on it. This, you know, rotting flesh horse, deathly looking unicorn, his name is death. Well, the only other place you find someone named death in scripture is of the devil. And like I said earlier, I think that's 1 Corinthians 15, but go look it up, folks. Don't quote me on it. It's in 1 or 2 Corinthians. I'm tired so I don't have perfect recall on that at the moment. And then it goes on to say, "And Hades followed with him, and power was given to them over a quarter of the earth to kill with a sword, with hunger, with death, and by the beasts of the earth." Right? There are many parallel passages to this in the Old Testament in connection with what happens to Israel in the fourth year of the tribulation week and to the church when we are led as lambs to the slaughter, you know, under persecution of the devil under the antichrist. when the time comes for all this to be fulfilled. But I also pointed out that this week of which the seal represents the fourth year is patterned after the crucifixion week, right? And I said that's beyond the scope of what we can talk about today really. But I I tried to point it out to a degree. I will just make one quick point on that. You know, a cross looks like a sword stuck upside down in the ground, right? >> Mhm. when Christ in Psalm 22 or 21 depending if you're looking in an English translation or the Hebrew text uh in that psalm he described those who were crucifying him as beasts and he specifically referenced the lion the unicorn and the dragon and apart from a corrected translation of that psalm that passage nobody knows it it's been in my book since 1998 it's the correct translation of the Hebrew text and in fact, you'll usually find if you find a like a reference Bible, a study Bible, they'll footnote that passage in Psalm 22 or 21 and say something along the lines of meaning of original Hebrew uncertain because they don't know what to do with it. They don't know how to correctly translate it. But I do and I've given the correct translation uh in both editions of the antichrist and cup for that verse. But basically that verse is representing and referencing that specific imagery that's on Charles Heraldic achievement both in Daniel 7 and in Revelation 13 combined in the one verse in Psalm 22. So the reason I go into all this is the sword is like a cross stuck upside down in the ground. Someone who is crucified, did you know that their belly medically distends like a victim of starvation in hours? from the physical trauma to the body. The belly distends as if they had been starving to death for a long time. Then it says with death. So obviously Christ died on the cross. And then by the beasts of the earth which is the reason I mentioned for example Psalm 21 or 22. And those beasts that Christ represent as Prince of Wales. I know this. I've known it since before the first edition of the Antichrist Kept was published and it's in the book. So now this suggests that Charles is going to be possessed by the devil just like in just like 2 Thessalonians 2, just like Revelation 13, right? >> Mhm. >> And hence we know why he had his portrait painted looking like he is dead, like he's rotting human flesh, you know, but still breathing somehow, right? Yeah, >> everybody looked at this, the whole world in there thinking, "What is up with King Charles III? Is he the ruler of hell? This is demonic and satanic." But nobody, you know, unless they've read my book or heard of it, could quite put their finger on it and explain this. Why would he approve of this? Why would he unveil this? Why would he be involved in requesting the monarch butterfly, for example, over the shoulder? >> Yeah. Why would it be painted as if it looks like it's in blood and bloody flames? Okay. So now, uh, and sorry, I probably forgot to, uh, show this again while I'm talking about it. Yeah, I did. I left the scripture up. So, sorry, folks. Here's the image one last time on the portrait showing all those things with an implication of death and resurrection with the butterfly in the hands and his coloration still alive. Now let's go to uh the scripture again and verses one to two the start of revelation 6 and John if you wanted to this is a good place to divide it into a second program if you needed to do that because what I'm about to share would be a good short segment. >> Okay. >> Uh frankly that would get everyone in the world who hears it wanting to hear the rest of this. >> All right. >> So I'm gonna come back to this uh right now. Okay. So, >> pull up. >> Do you want me to ask a question in between that and >> Yeah, go right ahead. >> So, I guess my my biggest question would be why do you think that uh King Charles has allowed London and most of England to kind of be overrun by Muslim population and kind of and really at the expense of the English people.

>> Okay. So your premise was allowed. He didn't allow it. He caused it. The entire thing, not just there, but in the United States and all over the world, has been done under him and those nations that are allegedly allegedly Judeo-Christian. So I'll explain how he did it. So I told you the United Nations was under him, right? >> Mhm. public p public private partnerships were largely popularized under Charles through the United Nations going back to the 1990s and even to the 1980s and this is documented in my book all kinds of major international public private partnerships that he has headed including partnering with the United Nations on a number of them. So for example, even the global security lecture series which happens annually, a global security lecture with the United Nations at the UN. Charles personally requested that that series occur that it be created and he personally wrote and delivered the first global security lecture at the United Nations himself. A lot of people don't know that. He asked it, he got it, he delivered it exactly what he wanted. The United Nations has always been under him. So people can look at who has been funding the flooding of the west by these Muslims, right? People can look at the Muslim Brotherhood, the terrorist Muslim branches from it like PI, Palestine, Palestine or Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Kamas, the Hoodis, Hezbollah in Lebanon. What happened with the Arab Spring in Egypt for example? What's happened against Israel with these other three that I mentioned? What happened in Libya when Libya was brought down? in the government and Mamar Kad Mahar Gaddafi was murdered because he wanted to create a gold standard for the Muslim world actually. So he was stopped under actually the cabal under Charles you know the whole banking establishment going back to the bank of England has been under the British monarchy and still is. When Libya was brought down they allowed the flooding of Syria. Syriad civil war they allowed the flooding of Europe. Turkey has been trying to flood Europe with Muslims as well for decades. All the barriers came down almost all at once following the Arab Spring in Egypt and what happened in Libya and Syria, right? How was it orchestrated? How was it funded? Well, one example, people look at George Soros, right? And they see him funding all kinds of bad things in the United States and the United Kingdom and so forth. what they don't know and and this is true I presume of Alex Soros's son who's now taken over things uh for Soros apart from all the public private partnership stuff that's the Soroses have been involved with Soros had an individual running his his business stuff handling much of that in terms of the finances for him that individual reports to Charles >> a lot of people don't know that Sarus himself was in the United Kingdom and was basically raised by a Nazi. He is an Edomite. You know, people look at Saros and they say, "You're a Jew. How can you be doing these things and be for the destruction of Israel or all the wickedness that you're fanning both in Israel and against the West? How can you do that?" Sarah has no problem doing that. And that's because he's not actually an Israelite Jew. He is a descendant of Edomite, converts to Judaism, a descendant of Esau. A lot of people don't know that about Soros. And um that's true of a lot of other so-called self-hating quote unquote Jews, the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, etc. Um at any rate, the banksters, you know, who are quote unquote Jews. It's true of a lot of them, that they're actually not Israelites, descendants of Edomite converts. Now, some of the intermarried with Israel going back even to the first century and earlier, like Herod was an Edomite, right? A convert to Judaism. Herod in ancient Egypt or or ancient Israel, pardon me, right? And his sons, they were >> converts to Judaism and undoubtedly some intermarried with Israelites historically. So there are some people out there who are both Israelites and and other ethnicities, you know, who are Israelites that happens. So coming back to this thing in the 1990s and the speech by the way to answer your question John is quoted in both editions of the antichrist in a cup of tea. Charles was publicly calling for borderless nations in the early 1990s. He was publicly praising Islam. He converted to Islam. He is a Muslim by the way. He converted to Islam in the 1990s. That's documented in both editions of my book under one of the the guardians of Islam, one of the head clerics of Sunni Islam. He has an honorary doctorate in Islamic studies from the university in Cairo, Egypt. Charles does. He has participated in Muslim worship. He has promoted Islam throughout the United Kingdom and the West, including borderless nations and bringing Muslims into the West. This is his baby and his brainchild in manner speaking. And it has been orchestrated with Soros, you know, helping to fund it through all kinds of schemes. And also the United Nations and the Roman Catholic cult, you know, helping to orchestrate it in partnership with Charles uh and the United Nations both to bring this to pass. And what they have attempted to do is flood all the most quote unquote Christian nations with Muslims so that they could ultimately destabilize those nations. You know, bring down their governments in maiden-like coups, you know, in a manner of speaking and election thefts and uh you know, Muslims ultimately taking over through violence on the streets, etc. and fmenting and inspiring that groups like Antifa, BLM, BLM being communist, Antifa being actually fascist and socialist while claiming to be the opposite, you know, through all these kinds of radical wicked groups who are Satanists, you know, by any other name to use them to destabilize the West so that they could bring these nations that would otherwise oppose global governance into the future global government. That has been the whole point all along. and to bring to power this satanic rule under Charles ultimately. >> That has always been the point from the start. And so Charles was calling for this from the 1990s. And the quotes for everything I just said in the documentation to support it is in, you know, a lot of it in the first edition, but the rest of it in the second edition also. >> Interesting. Yeah. I wondered about that because it just seems like it's all falling apart underneath his rule and so it makes sense. >> Yeah, that's the whole point. That's why they're trying to fment civil war here. They've tried to do it in u Israel and other nations as well. They're trying to bring down the conservative quote unquote governments into people who would be pliable like at the World World Economic Forum types who would be pliable, you know, in terms of joining actual global governance through an expanded security council or reformed United Nations in the future. >> Yeah, that makes sense. >> Okay. And now let's go to the first seal of Revelation 6. So folks, I'm going to talk a bit about Donald Trump because a lot of people have looked at him and said, "Gee, uh, he looks like the Antichrist to me." And I've pointed out very clearly, if you've heard what I've said in this interview so far or the prior interview, depending on whether John makes it the prior interview, I pointed out very clearly that in fact only King Charles III, aka the 21st Prince of Wales, still in forever, is biblically qualified in all history, past, present, today, future ever, to be the antichrist, the top dog Antichrist of history and scripture based on the imagery of Revelation the calculation in Revelation 13 and the imagery in Daniel 7, let alone the statue that I showed the idol, you know, that causes desolation that already exists to him that'll in the future go on the temple mount. So, based on those things, it can only be Charles, it cannot be anybody else, period. And if you think it can, you haven't paid attention or you haven't come in at the beginning of this, you've jumped in in the middle. So, go back and watch all the evidence that was presented. Now, is that to say that Donald Trump is insignificant or does not have a role to play? Well, I've talked about him in multiple interviews over the last several months, John, over the past year, and in fact, early on in this current term of his as the 47th president last year, I pointed out when JD Vance was speaking to European nations that we were witnessing, and I pointed this out in radio interviews publicly, we were witnessing the breakup of NATO. And in my 2018 book, North Korea, Iran and the Coming World War: Behold Red Horse, which we could talk about another time, I talked about the future breakup of NATO in that book, published in 2018. I started writing that one in 2007. That book is how World War II comes to be, and it's actually about the second seal of the apocalypse. So, between the two seals we're addressing right now, it pertains the second year of the tribulation week. But did you know, John, that in that book, I talked about Russia's invasion of Ukraine? and Russia's invasion of the European Union. The first part has happened already, but that was years after that book was published.

>> The rest of what comes, the gestation of World War II, which gets triggered actually by North Korea and in which Russia, China, Iran, etc. are involved, NATO and so on, several other nations. All of that is addressed in detail in that 2018 book, North Korea Ran and the Coming World War, including the identity of the fiery red horse of the Second Seal and Its Rider. I actually know I know who all the horsemen are. I've known for quite a while, but I was questioning this one. And it was in the last few months that this has been completed. So, I'm going to describe this. And that is to say, folks, that there's a very, very strong possibility that as I'm speaking right now, we're already in the first year of the last seven years leading to Armageddon, that the tribulation week has already started. So, let me explain just briefly, and I can cover this in a lot more detail in the future if desired, but Trump's presidency, the current term, his inauguration began with thunders. There were multiple thunders, lightning strikes on in various places in the United States to include the White House and the Washington Monument. They happened the same night. It was so strange that they were caught on film and that they happened at the same time in multiple places. They had made global news. So people can go and look President Trump inauguration thunders, you know, White House, Washington Monument, etc. And you'll see three or four places that lightning and thunder struck caught on film at the same time at his inauguration.

>> So this seal is introduced with a voice like thunder saying come and see. And then it says and I looked and behold a white horse. Now that is not white house and there have been many occupants of the white house right none of them were this individual previously. It's not talking about the White House, so don't conflate it. But let me ask you, John, are you familiar with any kind of white horse symbolism in connection with President Trump? >> I can't really think of it other than on his on his golf, I think, on his golf symbolism, but I could be wrong. So his family fortune, the Trump family fortune, began with a white horse in or hotel >> in a mining town. It later became a house of illreute allegedly and that's where the Trump family fortune actually started a place called White Horse. So he does at least loosely have that symbolism associated with him. And there was a sign with a white horse also on that building. People can go pull up photos and details on it historically online right now. Okay. And then it goes on Hugh sat on it had a bow. Now you think of a weapon of war right when you read that. >> A bow. And arrows are not mentioned. So, people have speculated that this is somebody who either doesn't have arrows or isn't shooting them. And it seems strange for that reason, you know, or maybe he's coming in peaceibly in a in a manner of speaking. And it seems strange though, right? Well, the Greek text, this word that's translated as bow actually has as its primary meaning um distension, curvature, like a pregnant woman's belly. You know what it when it distends from pregnancy. It has as another primary meaning the rainbow like the arch of a rainbow that you would see on the earth. The the meaning of bow as in a weapon is actually a secondary meaning. And if you don't look at the Greek text you have no idea. In reality all three meaning all three meanings here pertain pertain pardon me. And the imagery of pregnancy here actually has to do with carrying Gaza and the 20point plan. That's actually what it's about. The evil seed in a matter of speaking at the beginning of the week in parallel to that prophecy in Genesis 3:15. And it's too much to go into here today. We could cover it in detail in another interview, but I have pointed out in other interviews and I'll be sharing some on my YouTube channel. And let me just point that out for you folks. If you're impatient, you can go to the to my YouTube channel, which I'm showing right here. It's just YouTube.com author Tim Cohen, to the videos tab, and I will be uploading uh some interviews here soon where I go into detail on that first seal, first seal. But if you go back to um oh I forget if it's the third or fourth interview I did with this fellow Sean Atwood. I also talk about the bow imagery in connection with uh Trump and Gaza and those but at that time a key thing was missing which I point out in those interviews that would not permit me for that reason to identify Trump as the rider of this white horse. that changed months ago. So, I'm going to explain. But anyway, the word bow here actually has all three meanings and I've and they're all true of Trump and his administration without belaboring the point right now. I'm just going to skip over the rest of that because it's a lengthy discussion in its own right. And then the word crown here. People looked at this during the corona virus pandemic and said corona corona beer could this be uh a royal crown you know corona crown that kind of thing without looking at the Greek text and not understanding that what is being spoken of here is not a royal crown at all in the Greek text. It is a stephanos. That's the Greek word that's used. And a stephanos can be a like the leafy wreath that someone would be crowned with at the end of a Roman or Greek game as the victor of the game like in a coliseum.

>> It can also be a gold medallion that they might receive as a victor for example of a game or some context a gold medal for example like in an Olympic game. All those things are stephanos and it usually has elements of nature as well like leaves for example associated with the design. So it could be leaves, wood, bone, elements of nature as as part of the design. So here was President Trump and I documented this in my 2018 book that I mentioned North Korea ran in the coming world war. Even back then for years he had been saying because he was meeting with Kim Jong-un of North Korea that he should receive the Nobel Peace Prize. Look at me. give me the Nobel Peace Prize cuz I'm going to North Korea. I'm risking my own life to meet with this guy and try to bring peace and denuclearization on the Korean Peninsula. Well, the Nobel Committee did not go for that, but he thought he should get it. And so, I documented that in the book. More recently, in his current term, he's been saying the same sort of thing, only magnified, you know, several times over. And simultaneous to that, you've had him, you know, ostensibly actually stopping a number of conflicts around the world. He claims eight plus. You know, he claims to have saved millions of lives already. And uh whether anyone agrees with that or not, he's certainly stopped some so far. He's certainly saved lives to this point. And the whole world just about is already publicly acknowledging that. World leaders who don't even like Trump in some cases are saying to the Nobel committee, you should have given him the peace prize in 2025. And we're saying to him, you should give him the peace prize for what he's already done, which is far more than other world leaders have accomplished in our lifetimes, if not ever, you know, since the prize has existed, you know, for global peace. Meanwhile, uh, several other things have occurred while Trump is saying, "Look, I should receive the prize." And that he didn't get it. Right? So, the lady in Venezuela received that prize, right? Well, there's a secondary meaning to this word given right here in the Greek text that most people have never looked into. They've never noted it. I don't know of anyone else who's noticed it actually, but probably somebody has. The secondary meaning is dedicated or dedicated. So it can say a Stephanos was dedicated to him and that would be a legitimate translation. Well, what did she do? She received the Nobel Prize which includes a gold medal and immediately upon receiving it she dedicated it to President Trump because even she thought he should have been the one who received it. Mhm. >> Never before done in the history of the Nobel Prize by anybody. And the committee was not very happy about that. The Nobel Committee. They're still not. What happened last month? She then met with Trump in the White House and she gave him the medal from the Nobel Prize. She gave it to him physically at the White House. It's now his even though the Nobel committee isn't acknowled, you know, they're not recognizing it, you know, in any formal way. They don't like it. But what can they do, right? >> Right. >> But the medal itself is the actual Stephanos of the prize. She gave him the Stephanos. So, first she dedicated it to him, then she gave it to him. Right. >> So, he literally has the crown. That's the thing that was missing, the Stephanos. back when I was doing those interviews months ago with uh Sean Atwood in the UK. Well, in between those two things, there's something else even more significant and shocking that occurred while I was overseas. So, President Trump visited Japan on his way to South Korea. In Japan, their leader and their government gave President Trump a gold egg or ball for his peace efforts. another form of Stephanos, right? This is before the Venezuelan uh recipient gave President Trump her gold medallion last month. This was prior to that. So, this was in 2025. Then, President Trump traveled immediately from Japan to South Korea. Do you know what they gave him in South Korea? >> Yeah, like a a crown of sorts. >> A Stephanos. And do you know the history of that crown? >> I did. I did know it. I can't remember now, but I did remember when he got that looking into it. What is it? The history of it. >> So, it's almost a thousand years old. It goes back to when the peoples on the Korean peninsula were first unified under a leader. And the crown was created for that leader. So, for all the peoples, in other words, of the Korean Peninsula, the Korean people, so to speak, almost a thousand years ago. And it was never a royal crown. It became the highest honor of the Korean peoples on the peninsula, a civilian honor. It was their their highest honor ever to this day. And until President Trump, it was never in history given to a non Korean. And so they created it, this instance, for President Trump. And they dedicate they not just dedicated to him. They gave it to him very publicly along with a necklace that he could have put around his neck making it another form of Stephanos in a matter of speaking if you wanted to view it that way. But this is an actual literal Stephanos and it actually does in its design have elements of nature and it is not a royal crown. It's an actual crown that's a Stephanos a victor's crown in a manner of speaking. And here's the huge huge irony. So here you have South Korea giving President Trump the ultimate form of a Stephanos for peace efforts in unifying peoples. A crown that he could wear that he actually said he wanted to put on right then and there. He asked if he could wear it right then and there when they gave it to him publicly though I'm not aware of him actually doing that. He he ingest I suppose but he asked if he could wear it. So you have that and then what happens one seal later if he is the rider of the white horse the fiery red horse goes forward right representing the second year roughly of the tribulation week let me just show that briefly here in the second seal you've got this rider on a fiery red horse which I'll just say here without going into detail is actually a fiery red pegasus It comes out of Asian mythology. I show it in my book, North Korea Ran in the Coming World War. It's our national symbol. But anyway, this rider goes forth on a fiery red horse. It's granted to him to take peace from the earth. So that's obviously World War II if you take peace from the planet, right? >> You know that people should kill one another. So it's warfare in other words, presumably globally. And there was given to him a great sword. So I won't go into the details of all that but what I will point out is that that's North Korea's national symbol the fiery red horse and um so here you and the leader of North Korea is you know ostensibly the rider of that horse right >> so currently Kim Jong-un >> so you have South Korea acknowledging Trump's peace efforts and giving him the Stephanos for that as a kind of victory and then what happens you turn around in the blink of an eye and you know but about a year later and North Korea, the same Korean peoples, right? Actually takes peace from the earth, takes peace from the planet. You see the irony of that? I just find that incredible. >> Yeah. >> And so then here at the end of this first passage for the first seal, verse two of Revelation 6, it says that he goes out conquering and to conquer. And some translations have overcoming and to overcome, right? That's not actually a good translation. It's kind of poor. The Greek word that's used uh is more literally translated victory. So victorious and to be victorious. And it isn't necessarily a military victory. It can be any kind of contest that one would win. It can be the presidency. It can be a peace prize. It can be a battle. It can be a war. It can be a whole number of things, right? that someone would say, you know, in a meaningful way, I had victory over this. I had victory over that. And President Trump has, in fact, been an overcomer, right? He's overcome all kinds of things that, you know, by human odds he shouldn't have. Yeah. He's overcome lawfare where they intended to put him in jail, overcome law where they intended to steal his family wealth, you know, overcome at least a couple of attempts on his life, one of which struck his ear. overcome every effort to pre to keep him out of office, come back from the election actually being stolen in 2020 and re-entering in 2024. had victory there and now he seems to be going forth around the world you know saying I want to do this I want to do that reshaping you on the global stage and being victorious in one instance after another while everybody is thinking he can't do that but then he does it right >> so all this is to say the piece that was missing in all of this for me months ago was that Stephanos but now he's got it in spades So there is nothing remaining that needs to be fulfilled for this first horseman to all to already be riding. And until just a few months ago, that was never true in history. Wow. Well, I appreciate it, Tim. I know that we're going to talk again here soon and uh I appreciate you coming on. Um tell people once again your website. I'm going to put your YouTube Oh, yes. link and your website in the description. Yeah, thank you folks. And I want to be clear folks. Uh the website is prophecyhouse.com. P O P H Ecy. Charlie Y. So prophecy househ.com. And then my social media is just author Tim Cohen run together as a single word on YouTube. Uh on Facebook, same thing. You can easily find me if you want to write to me. You can do that on on Facebook. But Prophecy House is the only place to get a lot of my books and materials. And in the not too distant future, meaning in the next few years, uh hopefully soon some this year, I'll have three multi-olume series out, including one on non-aterrestrial life. And uh and multiple individual additional books. So about 40 different books. Right now, there are two out. There are going to be many more coming in quick succession covering a whole host of things including uh non-aterrestrial life and more things on what's happening in the Middle East and the false peace process etc. And so the last thing I'll say here is the second edition of the antichrist. You can only get that from prophecy. There is no electronic version of that. So, if you find a stolen ebook out there, you're actually looking at the 1998 first edition, which has about half the content and is very much outdated. And there's a whole lot of new evidence in the first edition, second edition, pardon me. The second one is the one you ought to read if you're going to put in the time. and everyone should read it and you should be sharing it with your pastor and every Christian you know because this is proof not only that we know the identity of the antichrist but for that reason that Christ's turn cannot be that far away. >> Thanks so much Tim. I appreciate it guys if you enjoyed this program go and hit the subscribe button hit the like button and hit the notification bell and share this out Tim. Thank you for coming on and you guys I'll see you guys next week. >> Thank you John. God bless. Shalom. Shalom.