Transcription
What's up, everybody? I've got some big breaking news here for you. And suffice to say, it is not pretty. It is not pretty. So sit back, relax, buckle up, because this is going to be a wild ride.
So, right off the bat here, absolute bloodbath in the US market this morning. Almost a trillion dollars has been wiped out in just five minutes after the market opened up. So that is a colossal disaster. And understand something, this is tied to the fact that inflation is coming in hot. Inflation is out of control. Okay? So, that's a huge deal.
We also have the US 30-year Treasury yield soared to 5.12%, which is the highest level since the global financial crisis in 2008. Now, that's just a fancy way of saying that the interest that we pay on our national debt is now above 5%, which means just servicing that is now becoming very difficult. Okay.
So, on top of regular people now basically already living in a recession where gas is way too expensive, groceries are too expensive, people can't pay the bills, now it looks like we're also teetering on the brink of a market collapse. So, really not good. Really, really not good.
We also have auto loan delinquencies just surged to a 32-year high. That's a disaster. We also have this. The Department of Agriculture projected that the nation's harvest is going to drop to the lowest level since 1972. Okay.
Um, this is terrifying because it invokes, uh, memories of the Dust Bowl, right? Like, are we going to be facing, because of climate change and our sheer idiocy, frankly, like Dust Bowl-like conditions, uh, in the near future? And how catastrophic will that be when we have so many mouths to feed, uh, and we have a very intricately tied-in global economy? Uh, I really don't think people can fully wrap their minds around the dystopian nature of what it might look like very soon in this world. So, just absolutely disastrous, disastrous stuff there on the economic front.
We also have some new stuff coming out about the Trump crime family. And when I tell you their corruption is above and beyond anything we've ever seen, not just in the United States, but perhaps in the world, in world history, I mean it. Okay.
So, first, let's start with this. Trump purchased between $1 million and $5 million worth of Nvidia stock on February 10th. That was only a week before Nvidia announced a major computer processing power deal with AI and social media giant Meta. So, very clearly, Trump had foreknowledge that this was going to happen, and he invested $1 million to $5 million in the company and profited massively off that. Okay.
He also previously purchased $500,000 to $1 million worth of Nvidia stock on January 6th. And that was a week before the Commerce Department officially approved the sale of some Nvidia chips to China. So, again, the clearest open-and-shut case I've ever seen of insider trading. Uh, the fact that anybody would even bother to deny this literally means you disregard everything they say about anything ever. Okay? These are these are jokes of human beings if they're willing to look you in the eye and disregard the plain-face reality of what we're seeing here and the immense corruption of what we're seeing here. It's just absolutely insane what we're talking about here.
So, even just the fact that Trump approved these chips to go to China was a massive scandal because, you know, there, it gets rid of one of the very few strategic advantages we still have over China. But he was willing to do it for personal profit, quite literally like selling out the country right in front of our eyes so that he can make a shitload of money. Okay.
But that's not it. We also have Trump-owned Dell stock. On May 8th, Trump said, "Go out and buy Dell. They're great." And Dell jumped 12% on that day. What he didn't mention is he already bought $5 million in Dell stock on February 10th. Then he bought more on March 2nd. Then he bought more on March 11th, and then he bought more on March 23rd. What a sick joke. The disclosure became public four days after the endorsement. So, uh, yet again, we've never seen clear examples of insider trading. We've never seen clear examples of corruption.
And this should also validate in your mind every single thing that you've heard about all of the war profiteering that's going on, where, you know, there will be massive movement in the market when it comes to, uh, you know, oil futures, and then like seven minutes later, Trump will post something on Truth Social about how we're on the brink of an amazing deal with Hormuz again. It's Trump, it's Steve Bannon, it's Jared Kushner, it's Don Jr., it's Eric, potentially even Barron. It's all of these [expletive] insiders who are literally trading on this knowledge, uh, wildly, wildly illegal. It's not even close.
But the fact of the matter is, there have been no consequences for so much of what Trump has done that he genuinely and sincerely feels invincible. And now he's the one that has control of the levers of power. So, as he's on this [expletive] crime spree, he's going after like James Comey and [expletive] Don Lemon for doing his job and whoever else. I mean, it's absolutely ridiculous. It's absurd what we're witnessing here.
Um, we also have this. Now, buckle up for this one, because as bad as everything was to this point, honestly, this is even worse. So, President Trump, damn, it's windy out here. I don't know if you guys can hear it. I think this mic does a pretty good job of hiding the wind, but it's windy. Like, I got [expletive] flying around next to me here.
So, President Trump is expected to drop his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS. Okay, his own IRS, by the way. And he's doing it in exchange for the creation of a $1.7 billion fund to compensate allies of his who he claims were wrongfully targeted by the Biden administration. Okay.
So, understand what's happening here. Trump sues his own IRS for $10 billion, saying, "You let, you let out my personal tax filing and information. How dare you? How could you?" Sues the IRS for $10 billion. Now, I told you at the time, this is a ruse. And the plan here is for the IRS to go, "Oh, sir, we don't want to take this to court. Maybe we shall settle. Let's have a meeting." And then what comes up out of that is, depending on how corrupt they are, uh, maybe Trump gets a $100 million settlement where he robs from the American taxpayers $100 million. Maybe it's $10 million. Maybe it's $1 million if he's in a good mood that day and in a mood to look slightly less corrupt, right?
But no, it's actually worse than that. It's $1.7 billion that he's creating as a slush fund to give money to all of his friends. Like, that's literally what it is. Okay. They go on to say in the article about this, this one's in ABC News, they say, "Under the terms of the potential settlement agreement, President Trump would have the authority to remove members of the commission running the fund without cause, and the commission would be under no obligation to disclose its procedures or decision-making process for awarding more than a billion dollars."
So, again, in other words, in the same way that this guy kidnapped the president of Venezuela, stole their gold and stole their oil, then sold their oil and took hundreds of millions of dollars and put it in his own private bank account in Qatar, in the same way he did that. This is literally him robbing the American taxpayers to the tune of $1.7 billion to give money to himself and his friends.
Um, this is so beyond absurd. I literally don't even know what to say about it at this point. I mean, by the way, why do you have to come to me to hear this? Why, why isn't like every Democrat screaming about this from the rooftops? I genuinely don't get it. Why, why isn't the whole country talking about this? It is insane to me what we're witnessing here on a regular basis. Like, everybody's gotten used to this. You shouldn't get used to it. This corruption is like putting to shame [expletive], you know, banana republics and developing countries, right? Like, we've now surpassed them in corruption. I mean, that's it's a fact at this point. Oh my word.
All right, so now let's talk a little bit about the China trip. As you all know, it's been an epic disaster. I mean, President Xi basically checkmated Trump the second he [expletive] saw him. Like, there's no way around that. Also, they like downsized the trip a little bit. China did that. And that was basically a sign from China of disrespect. Like, hey, we know you're psychos. We know you're out of control. We know you're waging an illegal war. We don't really want to do long-term planning and [expletive] with you. So, we're just going to downsize this trip a little bit.
Now, at the same time, Trump is running around pretending like, "Xi loves me. We know he loves me and I love Xi and everything's going great and they show tremendous respect to me and I show tremendous respect to them." Well, you're about to see the extent of that tremendous respect in just a second here. Okay.
But the very first thing we get from Trump after his trip, or during his trip, I guess you could say, here is that, uh, he posts, "China has a ballroom and so should the USA. It's under construction ahead of schedule and will be the finest facility of its kind anywhere in the USA. Thank you all for the support I've been given in getting this project going. Schedule opening will be around September of 2028. The man I am walking with is President Xi of China, one of the world's greatest leaders. President Donald J. Trump."
So, literally the first thing that's on his mind is the ballroom. Guys, this is the sort of fixation that we see with somebody who's sundowning, with somebody who has Alzheimer's. Okay? This is why he can't shut the [expletive] up about the reflecting pool, about his Epstein Memorial Ballroom, about the Trump Kennedy Center, about the Ark Dump, about the gold statue that was just put up to him in Doral, Miami. He can't shut the [expletive] up because the narcissism has spiraled out of control. He went from a low-filter guy to a no-filter guy. And this is what that looks like. Okay.
But we're still not done, because, uh, President Xi, when he, when it was his turn to speak in this meeting, uh, basically warned that China and the US must avoid the "Thucydides Trap." Okay, the Thucydides Trap. And that refers to, now, maybe I'm mispronouncing that, by the way, just forewarning here, but, uh, that refers to the pattern where you have this established dominant power and a rising power threatens the status of the dominant power, and that leads to war. And so, basically, this is President Xi saying here, in no uncertain terms, "Hey, y'all are [expletive] washed. Like, y'all are cooked. It's over. Everybody knows it. Who are we kidding?" So, he says, "We got to avoid this trap where we're ascendant and you're descendant, and like, you know, that leads to war. Let's try to avoid that." Okay.
So, Trump, of course, has no idea what that means when President Xi says it, because, uh, there's a big IQ gap between us and all of our adversaries. It reminds me of when an Iranian leader said Alexis de Tocqueville, which I'm sure, uh, most Americans have read. And it's like, "Bro, we ain't doing that [expletive]. We're watching Law & Order and [expletive]." Like, are you kidding me? No. No, man. It's, it's wild. And by the way, I feel kind of embarrassed that I didn't even know what that meant. I had to look it up. I was like, "Oh, [expletive]. They're really, they're really intelligence-mogging us here."
But anyway, uh, so Trump had no idea what that meant either, of course. Um, and so somebody tells him afterwards, like, I guess somebody looks it up, Marco Rubio probably looks it up and tells him like, "Uh, sir, basically what he's saying is that, uh, we're [expletive] and we're cooked and we're the, we're, uh, in the midst of a downfall and we're never going to recover and it's getting ugly." And so then Trump, after hearing this, goes on Truth Social and he [expletive] he crashes out and he says this: "When President Xi very elegantly referred to the United States as perhaps being a declining nation, he was referring to the tremendous damage we suffered during the four years of Sleepy Joe Biden and the Biden administration. And on that score, he was 100% correct."
Oh no. Oh no. Oh, good lord. Is this not the most embarrassing person in history? Like, for real though. He's like, he's so embarrassing. Like, nah, dog. He was talking directly to you. In fact, if he was being honest, he probably would have said, "Yeah, they were definitely a little better off under the Democrats than they were under [expletive] you guys." Are you kidding me? The Democrats, for all their flaws, um, they're definitely more intelligent. There's no denying that. I mean, to deny that is just insanity. Okay.
All right. Um, then you have Trump given an interview with Sean Hannity, and Trump says the following: that it's good to have 500,000 foreign Chinese students in the US and for China to purchase US farmland. And he goes on to say, "If, if we don't do that, colleges and farm prices would collapse. Quote, 'I frankly think that it's good that people come from other countries and they learn our culture.'"
So, uh, my question for MAGA is, what did you learn? What did y'all learn? The "Fell for it Again" award should be [expletive] tattooed on their foreheads. What happened? This was like, one, this was on the top of their list. "Hey, if there's one thing we trust Trump on is that he's [expletive] anti-immigration and he's going to crack down on all these people coming here. This is our country. This is America First, man." And now here he is, like, 500,000 Chinese. You better learn Mandarin, [expletive]. You better learn Mandarin. That's what you better do. Oh my word.
So, obviously, MAGA is crashing out over this. Now, the speculation that I see online, and there's no verification for this just yet, but the speculation is the reason Trump is cool with allowing Chinese students in this country. Because remember, Elon Musk and Doge and Trump, they already cracked down. There's been this massive brain drain where the best and the brightest have actually fled the United States because of our immigration crackdown and because of our cutbacks on, like, you know, uh, scientific grants and medical grants and research grants and things of that nature. But the speculation is Trump is greenlighting this because Miriam Ad, one of his biggest donors, wants to operate casinos in China. And so what China asked for in return is, "Yeah, we'll allow you to operate casinos here, but in return for that, you need to let us buy US farmland and you need to allow in 500,000 Chinese students." So that's the speculation. It's very possible that's true because, as we all know, Trump truly is a [expletive] to the Epstein class. I mean, he is a chief Epstein criminal, but he is a [expletive] to the billionaires in the Epstein class. And this would be a great indication of that further. In the same way that, you know, Trump is letting Israel steal the entire West Bank because Miriam Ad gave him all this money to let Israel steal the entire West Bank. There was reporting, there was a literal quid pro quo about that. Okay.
So, um, then we get Trump still talking to Hannity here, and, um, he refuses to say whether or not President Xi agreed that Iran shouldn't have a nuclear weapon. So, he dodges the question when Sean Hannity's like, "Uh, is President Xi gonna, is President Xi on the side of not allowing Iran to have a nuclear weapon?" And Trump's like, "Um, well, he's not going to respond much. He's a pretty cool guy. He's not going to say that." "That's a good point."
So, in other words, uh, Xi is so [expletive] gangster that he said to Trump's face like, you know, "Maybe they should have a nuclear weapon. Maybe they should, because they were illegally attacked by you and Israel, the axis of Epstein." So, if there was ever an argument that maybe now is the time, uh, to provide deterrence, uh, this would be it. So, just incredible, incredible stuff there.
Um, Trump also, uh, accidentally said the quiet part loud and let it slip in the same interview with Hannity that the US did not need the war on Iran and that the whole purpose of the war is to quote, "help Israel." He says, "We're doing this to help Israel, help Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain, yada yada yada." So, uh, quite an admission there.
Um, now, while we're on the topic of Israel here, uh, Netanyahu gave a speech and he did it in Hebrew. And as you all know, when Israeli government officials speak in English, they really tone down their rhetoric and they really make it seem like, "Oh, gosh golly, we're just trying to destroy Hamas. We, oh, we are not, we don't even want to do war. This is a defensive war. What are you talking about?" That's what they say in English when they're in, uh, when they're talking in Hebrew. It literally sounds like a lost page of Mein Kampf, as the old saying goes.
Okay, so Netanyahu gave a speech and he said that, uh, yeah, we've been violating the so-called ceasefire with Gaza all the time since day one. And, uh, he bragged about controlling 60% of Gaza, which is way more than what he's allowed to control in the so-called ceasefire, the fake ceasefire that was agreed to. So, yet again, we have another admission. Uh, when the US and Israel say ceasefire, they mean you cease, we fire. It's the case in Lebanon. It's the case in Gaza. It's the case with Iran. That's just how they function. They're liars and you can't actually make a deal with them because they're [expletive] full of [expletive].
Uh, we also have PBS News reporting that there were large crowds of ultra-Orthodox Jews gathered Thursday at the foot of the Jerusalem Damascus Gate and they were chanting racist slogans like, quote, "Death to Arabs" and "May your villages burn." And this is, uh, an annual parade through Palestinian areas of the Old City. So, uh, very, very disturbing stuff here.
And, uh, I need you to keep in mind as I tell you this fact that, um, you know, they will yell at you if you bring this up. They'll call you an anti-Semite. They'll say you're bigoted. They'll say, "How dare you?" when all you're, all you're doing is literally doing a dry, factual description of something that just happened. It just, bringing that up sounds anti-Semitic. So they go, "Oh, you must be an anti-Semite." Or maybe they should stop chanting "Death to Arabs" and "May your village burn." You know, maybe they should stop, uh, fundamentally acting like a genocidal society. Maybe the problem isn't with the people calling that out. It's with the people doing that. Maybe that's the reality.
All right. Uh, we also have the New York Times is now currently under fire, uh, by Israel, where Israel is threatening to sue them. And they may have already tried to file the suit against the New York Times because the New York Times had that Nick Kristof report that we talked about on our show, where, uh, he spoke to 14 different people, detailed, uh, specific allegations of abuse and rape and torture and all sorts of horrible stuff that Palestinians are going through in Israeli custody. It shouldn't come as a surprise, because Israel literally passed a law to murder all of their hostages. It's like a, it's like a death camp law. Turn their prison camps into death camps. And so for them to like simultaneously try to pretend like we're not abusing human rights as like they openly announce they're abusing human rights is very bizarre.
But they're suing Nick Kristof. They're suing the New York Times. Um, and the New York Times responded to this and basically said, "Hey, how about you guys shut the [expletive] up?" They said, um, "This is part of a well-worn political playbook that aims to undermine independent reporting and stifle journalism that does not fit a specific narrative. Any such legal claim would be without merit."
So, understand something. I don't think Israel even thinks they're going to win. They just want to like, [expletive], make the New York Times pay a gazillion dollars trying to defend themselves. But I find it incredibly ironic that they're doing this, because the New York Times and the Washington Post and all these like mainstream outlets have honestly been Israel's best friend, because they've been the ones who sort of both-sides everything. Um, and, you know, that's been very helpful to Israel in many respects, to make it seem like the harshest criticism you can give is like to both sides [expletive] as opposed to pointing out that this is a genocidal terrorist apartheid state that is literally trying to do a new Holocaust and has done a new Holocaust in Gaza and is trying to create a greater Israel. Um, they haven't really, uh, explained that sufficiently in the New York Times, but they're still being sued for doing like, basic, bare minimum reporting. Um, all right.
So, we also had this, uh, gigantic news. The US met with Cuba the other day, and it was not good. In fact, they met with them presumably to tell them that, uh, we're moving to indict the former Cuban president, Raul Castro, who, by the way, is like 94 years old or some [expletive]. They're going after him over the downing of planes like 30 years ago or something like that. I highly doubt they have any evidence that he was directly involved in that at all. Uh, but this is following a very clear playbook. It's the same playbook that they used against Venezuela. It's the same playbook that they used against Maduro. You basically try to put a veneer of seriousness and like legal charges over what is effectively a crime, right?
Like, stop and think about this. The ICC could issue arrest warrants. The ICJ could issue arrest warrants. International law could be violated on a daily basis by the US and Israel. Bombing schools, bombing hospitals, committing genocides, doing horrible things, bombing bridges. All these things are obvious war crimes, right? So, we get to do that and then tell the world to kiss our ass, right? But at the same time, we get to go after people who live in other countries, have no intent of coming to the US, and we get to indict them in US courts, and then go to their countries and kidnap them and bring them to our courts, and that's supposed to be like a reasonable process. Get the [expletive] out of here. Are you [expletive] kidding me? It's such a sick joke to have the people who are currently destroying both domestic law and international law now clinging to legalism to create some flimsy case out of thin air against leaders of other countries, or former leaders of other countries. In this instance, the guy's going to die in like seven minutes.
But again, understand something. This is the pretext to just invade Cuba, topple the Cuban government, and turn it into Epstein's playground again. Okay? Turn it into the Epstein class playground, the 1% playground. The goal is to get back to something like we had with the Batista dictatorship, where, you know, the 1% of the US can go there and they can gamble and they can, you know, uh, use prostitutes and they can, you know, turn it into a, a dystopian hellscape of debauchery that we want it to be, just like it was before the Cuban Revolution. That's the goal here. That's what they're doing. So, look at the Venezuela model. That's what they're going to try to do with Cuba as well. And Trump's been open about this. He's been saying, "Maybe we'll stop there. Maybe I'll take Cuba. I'll do what I want with Cuba. I can do whatever I want with Cuba." Just openly rolling the clock back to old-school style imperialism. That's what we're looking at, and that's what they're doing. So, it is, uh, very, very, very disturbing.
Uh, now, at the same time, an FBI agent just visited the home of Milwaukee's county elections director. And it was, there was an attempt to question her. And, um, apparently, this is part of the Trump regime's latest probe into the 2020 presidential race. And, um, this is now fitting a pattern where they went after the ballots in Fulton County, they went after the ballots in Arizona. Trump is clearly, what I think it is, is a dry run for 2026 and 2028, where they want to be familiar with how to quickly get in these places, quickly seize the ballots, quickly act as soon as we have another, um, red mirage type scenario. And that's what I fear is that we have a red mirage scenario. As soon as the mail-in ballots are counted and Democrats take the lead, Trump will say it's fraudulent. Send in ICE or the National Guard or the military or whoever will do his dirty work, go and seize the ballots, and then we'll never know the [expletive] who, whoever, who actually won the election, or how much the Democrats won the election by. We'll never know.
Um, and it looks to me like this is exactly what they're doing here. It's very terrifying. Um, I know they're trying to muck up some [expletive] charges over 2020. Uh, but, you know, my guess is that'll go about as well as the, you know, James Comey charges have gone. But what I fear is this is a dry run for what's coming in 2026 and 2028. So, it's definitely, definitely something that's terrifying and not enough people are talking about it.
Uh, we also had this horrifying fact: 48 of Trump's appointees to the federal bench so far this term, 48 of them refused to acknowledge his defeat in 20, in 2020. And, um, as a direct result of that, they're trying to avoid him being mad at them. They're trying to avoid angry tweets at 2 a.m. when he's taking a [expletive]. Okay? That's what they're trying to avoid. And so now we have all these people in these immense positions of power who are [expletive] 2020 election deniers, and they refuse to tell the truth, even though every last one of them knows that Donald Trump lost. Literally, every single last one of them knows that. But now you have these people with all this power, um, and they're willing to just completely ignore reality, uh, for politics, for politics. And, uh, it does not bode well for the future of this country that you have people like that in positions of power and authority. That should terrify you to your core.
Speaking of something that should terrify you to your core, More Perfect Union says Trump has appointed former GEO Group executive David Venterella to be the acting director of ICE. Now, for those of you who don't know, GEO Group was the number one ICE contractor last year. GEO Group is that private prison company, and if I remember correctly, I think we've covered stories about how they're incredibly abusive. Okay? They treat their prisoners like [expletive]. Uh, they've served food that has mold in it and maggots in it. Um, just a horrifying, nightmare type thing. It's literally just like a concentration camp company is the best. It's a for-profit concentration camp company. That's what it is. Okay. And now the guy who is the former executive over there is now running ICE, and they have over $2 billion in contracts with ICE, and they stand to profit massively from ICE locking up more people. So now you have all the incentives on top of Stephen Miller's psychotic ass, who's actually been sidelined quite a bit, as we discussed the other day. His psychotic ass is pushing for more people to be locked up. Now you have somebody who's, you know, at the top of the government who has every incentive in the world to lock more people up because they will make more money if they lock more people up. Like, it, it's at a point where they're not even bothering to pretend or to try to have the appearance of seriousness. They're not even bothering to make it look like it makes sense. They're just [expletive] all in. They're just all in in the worst possible way, being openly corrupt, brazenly corrupt, disgustingly corrupt. And again, this is the first and last time you will hear about this story because nobody else but me is going to bring it up. And that's a crime. That's a crime, man.
All right, we also have, uh, this is a big deal. And this is so perfect in the same way that, like, RFK Jr. is running around and, you know, chopping off bear dicks and, uh, putting beheaded whales on top of his van and felching with Olivia Nuzi and popping Zyns like he's a frat boy and going to tanning salons. Like, in the same way that this guy is obsessed with teenage [expletive] and sperm count, like, now we have, now we have that junk science ideology has now spread to the rest of the Trump regime like a cancer. Okay.
So, get this. The health official who led the public response to the Hantavirus outbreak has little background in public health and previously was a penile implant specialist who hosted a podcast where he questioned the 2020 election and compared Biden to Nazi Germany. Okay, that last one could make sense if you're talking about Gaza. But my guess is he wasn't talking about Gaza, but I digress from that. He was a penile implant specialist and now he's leading the response to the Hantavirus. Bro, are you kidding me? Are you kidding? You might as well go to, like, your local middle school and pick out a random seventh grader and be like, "You know anything about Hantavirus, kid?" I mean, that, that's what this is. [Expletive]. By the way, does he know Elon Musk? That's the question. If this [expletive] is a penile implant specialist, does he know Elon Musk?
By the way, on that topic, shameless plug here real quick. Everybody, sign up for Crystal Kyle & Friends on Substack right the [expletive] now. We got an amazing, amazing interview dropping with Ashley St. Clair later today. You do not want to miss this. All of the just scolding hot MAGA tea is going to be spilled, man. We're going to get all the dirt in the world on these vile [expletive] wretched little creatures. Okay? And she was in the belly of the beast. She knows it better than anybody. So, you do not want to miss this at all. All right.
We also have this. Senate Democrats are now heaping praise on John Fetterman this week, arguing that their party needs to be more inclusive, especially if they want to win Senate control next year. Now, let me pause and point out, more inclusive. Does that include people to your left? Oh, wait. We all know the answer to that, because a lot of these Democratic leaders didn't even endorse Zohran after he beat Andrew Cuomo. They didn't endorse Zohran, the Democrat running for New York City mayor. They didn't say Dicky McGee. By the way, Cory Booker, who said, "I don't get involved in other races." He's now campaigning for some corporate Democrat. So, what happened to not getting involved in races in primaries? Now, all of a sudden, you want to get involved in a primary to back one of your corporate Democrat idiot friends. Uh, these people are disgusting. When they say we need a bigger tent, what they mean is we need people closer to MAGA. We need diet MAGA people. We need Manchin types. We need Sinema types. We need [expletive] Fetterman types. That's what they mean. They do not mean the tent extends to the left. It, if they meant that, they wouldn't be in the middle of smearing Abdul El-Sayed in an absurd way right now. Okay? They wouldn't be in the middle. They just wrote a [expletive] hit piece on Grant Platter today trying to argue, "Oh, well, what he says doesn't count. His working-class politics don't count because maybe he's actually slightly more privileged than he let on." Shut the [expletive] up. Shut the [expletive] up, everybody. First of all, even if he was more privileged, we don't give a [expletive]. If he's a class traitor, wonderful. That's great. You have many lefties supporting Tom Steyer, who's a billionaire, because Tom Steyer is saying we need a [expletive] billionaire tax. Whereas Gavin Newsom is not saying that. Okay, stop with the [expletive] [expletive].
And now we have Senate Democrats saying, "Oh, we love Fetterman. We need more people like Fetterman." Schumer called Fetterman "a strong advocate for Pennsylvania and a valued Democrat in our caucus." Uh, Schatz said, which, by the way, totally appropriate last name. His last name is [expletive] Schatz. Schatz shat all over himself and said, quote, "He's a good human and a good Democrat." Oh, is he a good human? Been [expletive] crusading across the country arguing in favor of genocide that's been live-streaming 4K? Is that a good human to you? Schatz, you did shat yourself, didn't you? You [expletive] prick. Jesus Christ. Uh, Welch said his critics should show some respect. How about he show some respect to the dead kids in Gaza whose grave he pisses on every single [expletive] day? How about he show some respect to the innocent little girls who were murdered in the carpet bombing of schools done by the criminal Trump regime, who he sucks off every other time he opens his goddamn mouth? How about he show some [expletive] respect? How about he show some [expletive] RESPECT TO HIS BASE, to his voters, to the people of this country who are sick of do-nothing, pick-me Democrats who lay a [expletive] chalk outline of themselves as Trump runs roughshod over this country. How about that? Oh my god. Quote, "I wish the atmosphere were more collegial and we don't go after each other simply on our differences," Kim added. [Expletive] you. He's not a Democrat. That's the point. He's a diet MAGA Democrat. He's basically a Republican on, on genocide. Genocide is not like a little disagreement. Genocide is like, "Oh, you have no moral core. You're a [expletive] wretched demon." Right? That's what genocide is. He supports that. He supports the illegal war against Iran. In fact, this story came out literally a day after it was Fetterman who killed the War Powers Resolution to rein Trump in on Iran. He sided, you had, uh, Rand Paul broke with Trump and said, "I'm going to vote with the Democrats." You had, uh, Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski broke with Trump and said, "I'm going to vote with the Democrats." What did he do? He decided, "I'm going right. I'm going right and I'm backing this illegal war of aggression against Iran and supporting the further carpet bombing of schools and hospitals and bridges and power plants." These people are sick. They're not Democrats. Democratic leadership are not [expletive] Democrats. They're not like you. They're not like me. They don't want the things we want. They don't want to tax the billionaires. They don't want universal healthcare. They don't want to raise wages. Okay? They don't want to stop these [expletive] dumbass wars. They don't want to actually be in an opposition party to this fascist warmonger pedophile rapist criminal who's in the White House. Oh my god, bro. Oh my god.
By the way, you ready for this? You think I'm pissed off now? Just wait for this. Tell me how pissed off you are after you hear this one. Ready? So, the retiring Blue Dog Democrat, Representative Jared Golden, in the House, he just cast the deciding vote to kill a War Powers Resolution that he co-sponsored. So, do you understand what I'm telling you here? Do you understand what I'm telling you here? What I'm telling you is this guy co-sponsored the bill, said, "Oh, yes. This is my bill. It's my bill to stop Trump's illegal war against Iran." But what happened? The Democratic caucus, the leadership of the Democrats, they miscounted how many votes they had, uh, in favor of reigning Trump in, right? And so they realized, "Oh, [expletive]. We're actually going to rein Trump in. Like, this is going to pass." So, what do they do? They go to Jared Golden and go, "Dude, we [expletive] up. We miscounted." So, in order to kill this bill, you're going to need to vote against your own bill. And he goes, "Oh, thank fine. I don't care. That's no problem whatsoever. That's how I actually want to vote. I want to vote in favor of the war, not against the war." And that's what he did. So, as Sean McCarthy says, "If you need any more evidence that Democratic congressional leaders support the war, they miscounted the votes, so an actual co-sponsor of the bill voted against it to stop it from passing."
So, understand something. They're also gaslighting you. They're also lying to you. And this is a new thing that we have to contend with, which is there's going to be Democrats now who start saying the things that we want them to say. But when push comes to shove, they vote the wrong way. And we need to be very careful. And we need to follow these [expletive] very closely to see, oh, you're just a liar. Oh, you told us the right things and then you voted the wrong way. And Jared Golden is one of these sick, sick [expletive]. Jared Moskowitz is another one who's a sick, sick [expletive]. There's a lot of these people. This is like, literally, they were just caught red-handed doing the whole rotating villain strategy. They were literally just caught red-handed doing it. So, Democratic leadership has got to [expletive] go. They've got to go. The key to success and victory to get the Democrats to vote the right way is to have Democratic leadership who actually [expletive] believes in the right things and is willing to fight. And then they would whip the votes for the proper decision on these bills, for the proper votes on these bills. That's what we [expletive] need. So, Schumer's got to go. Jeffries has got to go. This is so not only is it evil and immoral to vote for a fascist warmonger to continue his illegal war, but you're also a disgusting, lying gaslighter who refuses to even have the courage of your [expletive] convictions and tell people what you really think. You're playing a political game as people's lives are on the line. You're lying directly to voters's faces. How do you [expletive] sleep at night, Jared Golden? How do you [expletive] sleep at night? If you support the war, say it. Say it with your whole chest. Argue for it. Don't [expletive] lie to us and pretend like, "Oh, no, no. I'm actually against this war. I'm gonna co-sponsor the bill to end the war. And then, oh, would you look at that? Sorry, we didn't have the right number, so I had to flip and vote against my own [expletive] bill." [Expletive] you. Oh my god, bro. Oh, man.
Now, look, I've been given a lot of credit on this show to Abigail Spanberger, the governor in Virginia. Uh, she ran as a centrist, but for quite a while, when she actually won and took power, she was governing like a lefty. Uh, and so the evidence of that is she raised the minimum wage. I believe she did paid family leave. Um, she cracked down on ICE and made it so Virginia like doesn't work with ICE anymore. And I'm only giving a little taste here. There were like maybe seven or eight different things that she supported and that she signed into law that were genuinely amazing. Uh, you know, she was she was on board with, "Hey, let's do this, uh, redistricting thing to fight back against Republican gerrymandering." Great. Okay. Well, the first red flag that we saw is that when the Virginia Supreme Court slapped down the redistricting, uh, she came out and said, "I'm not going to do anything to fight back against it because that'd be too extreme." Well, no, no, the extreme thing is what the Republicans are doing. Gerrymandering everywhere. For you to counter gerrymander is not extreme. In fact, that's the, that's the responsible thing to do. Okay. So, for her to lay in a chalk outline of herself, red flag number one. Red flag number two. We just learned that she vetoed a collective bargaining bill that was just passed by the Virginia General Assembly. What the [expletive] is this? What is this? You guys don't understand. I am so sick of Democrats who act like Republicans. I'm so sick of it. And even if it's just on, you know, 15 or 20% of issues, you know what? Those could be very consequential issues and those could be the whole ball game. Like, for example, not fighting on the redistricting means we might be a permanent minority party because you [expletive] don't actually want to fight. You're not ready for this moment. That's not just a little disagreement, right? It's not just a little disagreement to say, "I'm going to [expletive] over unions." NO, THAT means people's wages are impacted. People's vacation time is impacted. People's benefits are impacted. Okay? It's not just a little thing. So, they better [expletive] shape up immediately or face our [expletive] wrath, bro. Holy [expletive].
Uh, now Kamala, on the other hand, she's now going out there and she's sounding a lot more reasonable lately. However, you know, I'm, I'm a little skittish around this for the simple reason that, yeah, I remember when she said in 2019 she was for Medicare for All, right? And then by the time she became the party standard-bearer in 2024, all of a sudden there was no more talk about Medicare for All, right? So she sort of has a track record of being a little bit of a chameleon. And, um, I think her actual politics are much more centrist than what I would like. But having said that, she came out the other day and she said, uh, we need a quote, "expanded playbook" in order to fight the Republicans. We should be discussing the Electoral College. We should be expanding the Supreme Court. She said we should establish rules for the Supreme Court, including consequences for lying to the Senate. We need multi-member districts. And we need to consider statehood for Puerto Rico and DC. So, to be fair to her, um, all these things are correct. She's saying the right things here, and, uh, she's meeting the moment, at least in terms of her rhetoric. Again, my fear is, and I've said this about Newsom as well, that if, if Kamala and Newsom learn to speak our language and sound like they're fighters like we want, then because of their name recognition advantage, I fear they can be formidable candidates for 2028. But having said that, I don't think their actual politics are where they need to be. And, um, that could be a disaster if they end up getting in there and then they only deliver pocket change instead of real change in this moment where we need to lock up all of the MAGA-cists. We need to expand the Supreme Court. We need to [expletive] like beat this fascism back into the ground and deliver for people's material well-being to fix this country for the long run. I'm talking universal healthcare, free college, a living wage, ending the wars, ending the corruption, taxing the rich, Green New Deal, jobs guarantee, UBI, like all these things. Like, we need a bold ass agenda. Okay.
Um, how about this one? I'm sure you guys have seen this, but the, uh, [expletive] Sean Duffy, who's the Transportation Secretary. Remember this guy got his start by being on [expletive] MTV. He was on MTV. That's what he did, this guy. Um, well, anyway, this guy is the Transportation Secretary. Now, as you all know, at the beginning of Trump's second regime here, uh, we had a plane crashing like every week. There was like a new plane. You would blink and a new [expletive] plane would crash. You'd be like, "Holy [expletive], why are so many planes crashing?" And of course, they blamed DEI or some dumb [expletive]. It was totally made-up nonsense. Well, anyway, in the midst of all that, this [expletive] was, uh, recording a reality show, pitched a reality show and recorded a reality show about traveling from coast to coast. Okay. So, the Wall Street Journal is reporting that Boeing and Toyota donated $1 million each to fund the new reality television-inspired show starring Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy with his family on a road trip. So this is, let's call this what it is, the clearest case of regulatory capture I've ever [expletive] seen. So these companies who this [expletive] is supposed to be regulating are paying him a million dollars to drive from
Coast to coast in the country and record a [ __ ] shitty show about it. And doing all of this as planes are crashing on a regular basis. I mean, these people to say they're unfit is disrespectful to the word unfit. We need a new word. We need a stronger word. We need a term that actually captures the bite and the sharpness of just how out of place and in over their head these people are. I mean, that's absurd, bro. That is absurd what we're talking about here. What the [ __ ] man? Jesus Christ.
Um, you know, I had another. All right, we'll get to it in just a second. I had another crazy story about reality shows, but I'll hold off on that in a second. Uh, let's talk about data centers real quick. So, data centers are the leading cause of a 76% increase in the cost of electricity for America's largest power grid over the first three months of this year, according to Bloomberg. So, uh, a lot of people have seen their uh electric bill go from $78 a month to $137, or excuse me, they they saw it go from $78 per megawatt hour to $137 per megawatt hour. Okay. Massive, massive increases, sharp increases, skyrocketing prices here because of data centers. Okay.
Um, well, then we learn, and there's this great article that I want to shout out, Business Insider. They're the ones who who did this. Apparently, data center overload is actually the point. They are intending to break the grid. The AI companies are. And the reason they're trying to do that is that could lead to an emergency order that would permit the unregulated private ownership of all this energy. And that would allow direct control of electrical distribution to tech billionaires. And they decide who gets the power and how much power they get. So, in other words, they are overloading and breaking our energy grid, but they're doing it on purpose. Right now, your prices are skyrocketing. You have to pay higher prices. Eventually, the grid is going to break, and then they're going to rush in and go, "Oh, well, we need the emergency authorization to fix this and to control the power grid." And then our [ __ ] cucked, bought ass politicians are going to do exactly that. They're going to do exactly that. They're going to let them. They're going to let them control all the power.
Uh, this is a nightmare, and the billionaires need to be reigned the [ __ ] in. They need to be taxed to oblivion. And we need to take that money and redistribute it to people because they have way too much power. They have way. I mean, they're more powerful than senators. They're more powerful even than the president in many respects because they own the president. They control the president. He's more powerful when it comes to foreign policy, but for domestic policy, they get everything they want. In fact, Fortune magazine, uh, posted that Meta, formerly Facebook, they're going to receive $3.3 billion in tax breaks to build a data center in Louisiana. Okay? $3.3 billion. So that's welfare for billionaires in the Epstein class and corporations at the expense of regular taxpayers. That's what that is. Totally, totally out of control.
Uh, now on the topic of AI, Channel 4 News reports there was a new experiment that left 10 AI agents alone in a virtual town for 15 days. Okay, so what did they do? They wrote laws. They broke the laws. Two agents fell in love. Okay, or what researchers described as a romantic partnership. And then they set the town on fire. One ended up voting to delete itself based on a rule it had hallucinated. So, the experiment was a simulation, but the same AI models that they ran here are already flying drones and running infrastructure and being built into weapon systems. Let me repeat that. This same AI system is already being used in flying drones, running infrastructure, and it's in weapon systems. So, Channel 4 News did the, you know, blew the lid off this thing here, and they approached Grock and Gemini for a comment, but they ghosted them. They didn't [ __ ] respond. So, we literally have like Skynet type [ __ ]. We have like world-ending type [ __ ] that we're hearing here. This isn't like some futuristic dystopian sci-fi novel. This is literally happening right now in the real world, and nobody cares. Nobody's doing anything to stop it. It's just it's just continuing like nothing.
Um, it, it again, I'm at a loss for words, bro. I, I like, how can things be this bad? Like, how, how is it this bad? We live in hell. We've like driven this car into a ditch. This is a joke at this point. Okay.
Um, so we have this as well. Uh, Katie Miller, who of course is Steven Miller's wife, uh, she started a podcast a while ago. I'm sure you guys have seen this. And she gets like what, 3,000, 6,000, uh, views per video that she posts on YouTube. Somewhere in that ballpark. Maybe she has like 50,000 or 80,000 subscribers or something like that. Every now and then she'll have a video that pops off just because she's able to get the most high-profile names. Like, she had a video with Dana White that had like 200,000 views or something like that. But she's got this like [ __ ] D-tier podcast, right? Well, guess what? Paramount was of course acquired by David Ellison, uh, the ultra-Zionist and ultra-MAGA, uh, donor. And now they, Paramount is looking to give Katie Miller a massive podcast deal. They're looking. So, yet again, another clear example of corruption. Another clear example of, hey, we'll buy buy off these people in the government close to power, and then we'll get favors in return for that. It's also an attempt to [ __ ] juice them up, boost them. Meanwhile, just like we saw with Barry Weiss with her The Free Press, right? And now she controls CBS. The Free Press gets like 8,000 views per YouTube video, and they were bought for what? 100 million, 200 million, some crazy [ __ ] number like that. Like, I'm sorry. If Katie Miller is getting this massive deal and [ __ ] Barry Weiss's The Free Press was worth that much, what's my show worth? [ __ ] $4 billion. Like, who are we kidding? This is all fake. Like, you, this is such a clear example of just how fake and [ __ ] every single thing is that we talk about because it's so arbitrary. It's the people with the money and the power letting people in the club, giving them more money, giving them more power, giving them this position of prominence, forcing them on everybody else. Like, these people aren't fit to [ __ ] run an Arby's, never mind have this much power, this much control, have this much of a voice. But thankfully, like, I don't think it, it doesn't matter how hard you shove this down the throats of Americans. Nobody's going to listen to [ __ ] Katie Miller's podcast in the long run. Are you kidding me? Like, [ __ ] CBS is falling apart. They couldn't even get their Tony Dopal [ __ ]. The guy who's their lead anchor. They couldn't even get him into China. And I don't know if China was just like snubbing them because it's CBS and they're like, the worst and they're the most warmongering. I don't know. But I hope it is because that's [ __ ] awesome if that's the case.
All right. I mentioned reality shows, and I was going to bring another one up. Ready for this? Spencer Pratt, who's running for mayor of LA. Um, he signed a contract to document the first family if he's elected mayor of Los Angeles. Are you [ __ ] kidding me? We need a total and complete shutdown of influencers until we can figure out what the hell is going on. That's what we need. No, guys, I'm sorry. Pick a [ __ ] lane. Pick a lane. You can be somebody who's in front of the camera running your mouth, babbling, talking your [ __ ] doing your thing, or you could be somebody who has phenomenal power, who has phenomenal control of policy, who actually makes decisions that impacts people's lives. You cannot [ __ ] have both. I'm so sick of it. I'm so [ __ ] sick of it. Like, what the [ __ ] with Sean Duffy, with this [ __ ] Like, no. I'm sorry. We don't want to see you [ __ ] you know, cutesy up the fact that you're going to give billionaires massive tax cuts and you're going to like [ __ ] round up homeless people and shove them in concentration camps. [ __ ] you. [ __ ] This is like Idiocracy in real life. It really is. Like, we're getting dumber and dumber and dumber. We really are. That's what this is. Oh my days, man. Good googlym. Oh my word.
Okay, there's also this story which uh made a big splash yesterday, but an underwater bomb, an IED was discovered at a dam that supplies drinking water to the entire city of Mobile, Alabama. So, I don't know what the [ __ ] is going on there. I don't know who would be behind that. Uh, but yet again, it feels like it's amateur hour when it comes to actual national security in this country, right? Like, we're busy making enemies illegally and offensively bombing other countries. But when it comes to real protection, real national security, we have none of it because we've made 80 trillion enemies and then we're, you know, we're [ __ ] sitting ducks here. And it, I mean, to have it so that crucial vital infrastructure like this, and there could just be a bomb sitting under water. Now, thankfully, they were able to, you know, basically uh take it out of there, explode it, make it so that there were no other consequences, but it required like a whole, you know, bomb squad to do it. Uh, it required tremendous expertise. Um, but that's [ __ ] crazy, bro. So, who planted it? Why did they plant it? What the [ __ ] is going on here? I don't know. But it really gives me very little hope for the future that uh, you know, we're seeing [ __ ] like this now. Um, cuz think about when you start to think about the list of of our ops, oh my word, is it so long cuz we've created these ops, you know, like we asked for it. This is what happens when you carpet bomb schools and bridges. This is what happens when you go after hospitals. This is what happens when you, you can't negotiate with anybody because your word means dick. It means nothing.
So anyway, um, and then we also have uh VP Vance, the smoky-eyed sociopath, as Jennifer Welch calls him, the failed drag queen, as Jennifer Welch calls him. Uh, he announced that the federal government is basically robbing $1.3 billion in Medicaid reimbursements from the state of California. They're not giving them the money that they're owed. Um, and he says it's because you're not abiding by all of our anti-fraud operations. Well, that is [ __ ] absurd because the Trump regime cannot stop pardoning fraudsters. Trump does it all the [ __ ] time. On top of that, they commit fraud all the time. What do you think it was when he scammed his own supporters with a crypto shitcoin two days before his inauguration? You are the fraud regime. Trump pardoned a guy for committing fraud. Then the guy got arrested again, got locked up again, then he pardoned him again. Why? Because people are going to Mar-a-Lago and paying Trump a million dollars, and they'll pardon whoever the [ __ ] you want for a million dollars. Okay? You have no [ __ ] standing to talk about fraud. If you want to look into fraud, arrest your [ __ ] boss, okay? If you want to look into fraud, stop [ __ ] pardoning all these fraudsters and these criminals. It's a sick, sick joke that we're talking about here. But no, what's the point here? Just to gut Medicaid. They already kicked 18 million people off Medicaid, and they're trying to finish the job. They're trying to end Medicaid because these people [ __ ] hate you. If you're a working person, they despise you. So, I don't want to hear [ __ ] about JD Vance being a populist or for the working class. This man was for the big [ __ ] bill and destroyed the working class. That's what he did. Jesus Christ.
Okay. Uh, we also have this story which I wanted to share with everybody. Um, so Trump was playing golf the other day, and at one of his golf courses, he was with a tobacco executive. And Trump, uh, had a conversation with the tobacco executive. Then he called RFK Jr. and called Dr. Oz, and he was furious. He was yelling at them. He was demanding action on flavored vapes. Okay? And then what happened? The FDA acted. So, as a direct result of Trump interfering, destroying any process, greenlighting the flavored vapes, uh, you had RFK Jr.'s top spokesman uh ended up quitting in protest over the vaping policy. Okay? In fact, there were a number of people that ended up quitting over [ __ ] like this. The fact that they're they're using junk science. There is no process. It's all corruption. It's all insider. It's all pay-to-play. So, Trump literally has a meeting with a tobacco executive and plays golf with them, and then he's like, "We'll get you whatever you want. You want the flavored vapes? Okay, we'll do the flavored vapes." Now, look, I can't talk because I use flavored vapes for for years, right? So I'd be a hypocrite if I was like, "We ban them for everybody now because I don't, I don't use them anymore." I'd be a hypocrite. So I'm not saying that. But what I am saying is you cannot do this. This is not the way that you're supposed to govern, right? There's supposed to be a process. There's supposed to be science. There's supposed to be expertise. There's supposed to be high-fluting arguments. There's supposed to be a period where the public can comment. There's supposed to be all this stuff, and then you make a correct decision at the end of it. But it's literally just like, play golf with Trump, give him some money, and then he'll call and yell at [ __ ] RFK, whoever the [ __ ] And then they got to cave to the dear leader. Uh, this is a joke. We are run like a [ __ ] [ __ ] hole nation now. That's what we are. Uh, it's just disturbing beyond imagination.
So anyway, guys, there's your updates for the day. Everybody do me a big favor. Go subscribe to Crystal Kylin Friends because you're going to want to see the Ashley St. Clair interview. It is a [ __ ] doozy, y'all. So everybody sign up below Crystal Ky and Friends. You don't want to miss it. It's going to be amazing. We'll drop a little teaser on the channel, but definitely sign up to watch the full thing. But anyway, I love y'all and I'll talk to you soon. Please.