Oh. Oh. Oh. Oh. Oh. Oh. What else will be? For Shalu. For me. Are you Holy Spech? What does Oh, you are Fore! Foreign! Foreign! What does foreign? But to Yes, I can see for no more. Steady. Yes. Fore can be in Foreign speech. Foreign speech. Foreign speech. What the followest Daddy to be? I was just going to stream this for two hours. Wait, hold on one second. Oh. Um, yeah. It's kind of crazy that the um I think the Zohan guy announced that for Christmas on the normally they do like a big show at um Central Park. They said they're only going to be playing shaheds now and everybody has to wear I think burkas. I'm pretty scared. Look at the Christians are losing the war on Christmas. Not good. Did you hear he's putting a nikab on the Statue of Liberty? Wait, can I get a picture of that? Muslim Statue of Liberty. Couldn't I ask like Chad GPT to make me one of these or did you hold Nvidia? You're up big. Why? What happened? Okay. Too lazy to look for this now. The meme has already been made. Hell yeah. Zohan said he would arrest night if he steps foot in New York City. I don't even know if the mayor can direct the police like that. I don't think that would happen.

Is really important that if we're going to ask voters to give us the power to add new government functions, we have to prove that government can function in the first place. Exactly. And reporting out this book with Ezra was really interesting. And I'll be honest, at sometimes almost black pilling, like it did not make me a libertarian. I I'm I'm I'm still a proud liberal. I believe in an aggressive, muscular government. But it was astonishing sometimes to see that these examples of government failure were not exceptions to a rule, but in some cases something tragically close to the rule itself. And I wonder if you've had a similar experience of coming into government, coming closer to government functions and recognizing that some things just don't work the way they should. Can you can you put some meat on those bones of what you've seen that's made you so passionate about not just announcing new public functions, but proving public excellence?

You know, I I very much agree and I think what's what's been frustrating is that even the very language of this conversation, language around bureaucracy, efficiency, waste, even quality of life, we've allowed this language to be seen as if it is of a right-wing concern when in fact this should be the most paramount left-wing concern because it is either the fulfillment or the betrayal of that which motivates so much of our politics. Nice. Damn. Wait, when did I buy these again? Bro, I am Hold on. I'm like a Okay. Like, I'm a I'm a master investor. Wait, I'm going to quit this streaming [ __ ] My crowd string is at 900k. What the [ __ ] Wait, when how long ago did I buy this [ __ ] My Nvidia is at 650. Hold on. Yeah, Crowd Strike was a [ __ ] monster. Show a lot of details. We bought in 529. Oh my god, I could sell. I should just sell this, right? No, wait. That's my Nvidia. Sorry. Wait, where's my Crowd Strike was 723. I can't sell Crowd Strike yet. My Nvidia is up to 670K. That's a 34% gain in a year. That's beating the market, right? One year. That's Oh my god. It's killing the market. What do you think about United Health? Maybe a similar play to Crowd Strike. No, that's some that's if you invest based on [ __ ] vibes. Healthcare and [ __ ] those companies don't make any [ __ ] money. Okay, that [ __ ] is way way way too regulated by the government. [ __ ] that. It's like investing in airlines. Who came with me on this? Who came with me on Crowd Strike and is still holding like a warrior, like a DG warrior to this day. My Crowd Strike is up 80.49% and we're not even a year in. We just have to make it 723. One more month. I never sold meta when you originally bought it. That's got to be a pretty big, right? I think Uh, this is unhinged.

Effective immediately, all individuals applying for an FM, M, or J non-immigrant visa are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all their social media accounts to public to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States under US law. The [ __ ] I don't even know what the what these visa categories are, but seems kind of a weird thing. I don't know. You always had to give them links to your socials for these visas. Oh, that might be the case. I'm not sure. Yeah. Okay. Um, okay. Hypothetical. All right. It's a little [ __ ] up, but I don't remember if I if this was in my Benny Morris convo or if we saw him say this somewhere else, but one of the comments that um Benny Morris made was, as sad as it is, if Israel would have just genocided the Palestinians, nobody would be talking about it today. It would just be over and nobody would care. But the big [ __ ] up on the Israeli part was just I I guess like expelling them or having them all flee instead of killing all of them, which is a little bit unhinged. Um I only decided to like dip into this because um Turkey is so important to the like to the history of the region, right? The head of the Ottoman Empire and everything else. Turkey's a NATO ally. I feel like Turkey basically did that, but with like multiple ethnic groups. I've heard like Armenian genocide brought up as kind of like a meme. Like nobody's ever really I never learned about any of that [ __ ] in school. But I feel like when Turkey um after the Ottoman Empire collapsed, when Turkey wanted to make a country, Turkey basically said, "Let's just kill every single person that isn't part of our group and then we're going to make our own kind of like ethnostate country explicitly." And then they like did that for like millions of people. Um the Armenians and the Greeks being the two largest crowds of people. Holy [ __ ] It's a lot of [ __ ] people. Like a lot of people, like millions of people for the Armenians and then I think over a million I think for the Greek expulsions and then nobody actually really gives a [ __ ] Nobody really cares. I don't know. I don't think Turkey actually acknowledges it as a as any like genocidal war crime or anything. I think it's only like 30 some countries. Um, it's actually wild. I feel like it's I feel like it's especially wild because so many people on the left are like racist towards me because my parents are from Cuba, but the history of Turkey is and by say by history I mean like the around the World War I era when the Ottoman Empire goes away and everything and they have their little war for independence and all that. Jesus. How long ago was that? Like a 100 years ago. The Young Turks are named after a group that committed a genocide, by the way. Maybe. Yeah. The um [ __ ] is it? It's cup. Um cup for I forget what it stands for. Who knows? Where are my Turkish people or or the people surrounding Turkey? Okay, just kidding. Nobody knows. That's good. Um, what was it called? Oh, the Committee of Union and Progress was the big revolutionary group between the late 19th century, early 20th century. Um, who were like the I think the most like hardcore faction of the the Young Turks. It's literally the anime meme of kill the pups so dogs don't come back to bite you. Damn. They also have an occupation of Cypress. Yeah, I mean, I've heard that that they have half the island. I just don't know anything about it. I mean, but I've heard that a lot before. Yeah, begging. I don't have to do anything. The things you're meant begging. I can ask for contributions whenever I want on my own stream and I can conduct myself however I want and you'll like it. Too bad. That's my prerogative. And you have no right to try to boss me around and tell me what to do cuz you're not my dad and you're not my boss. I'm my boss. Get it, chief? Okay. How about wasteful spending? I could spend my money however I want. Right now, I could literally blow thousands of dollars on nothing and you'll like it because it's my money. It's not your business. Deal with it, chief. All right. Uh, diet. I can eat whatever the [ __ ] I want because it's my life, not yours. Therefore, deal with it. I can shove delicious Takis encrusted chicken sandwiches into my mouth on stream and you'll watch it and you'll like it. Get it, chief. You don't get to boss me around because I'm nobody's [ __ ] Turkeykey's of leader, you mean leaders of Turkey? Auto Turk was a massive europile. Wanted to create a European nation. So he been a nation state around the Turkish ethnicity that was secular but given the 19 Oh, the way that they determined ethnicities back then also was really interesting. So I kind of thought that the I thought the panger [ __ ] was kind of cringe that we learn about in the um in the um in the in the rise and fall of the Third Reich book or whatever because Hitler was basically like listen if you speak German you're a German. And I'm like, "Oh, that's kind of stupid." But it's kind of funny because if you like taxonomy, I think like we kind of looked at animals and looked at how they functioned and it was like, "Oh, yeah, these animals are related." And then once genetics came along, we kind of started to shuffle a lot of stuff because it's like, "Well, hold on. Genetically, we can see lineages in a much different way than we used to when we would um taxonomize is a verb um in a particular way based on how they look as opposed to their genetic lineage." Apparently, it was actually decently common to think that language was actually I'm not trying to be woke also. [ __ ] you if you think this language was actually what people used to some extent to determine ethnic groups because that's what the Turks apparently thought as well where for the Turkish people it was if you spoke Turkish also this is another thing as I'm trying to chew through Turkish is just a language also I didn't know this Turkish is not like an ethnic group or whatever as well I just assume that I guess maybe it could be a nationality too but if you spoke Turkish back then people thought that languages were the best way to like approximate your history and that was how they determined like which peoples were who so which is which is strange I Never would have ever imagined that. I guess that's avoiding CK3 so hard. It's crazy. What is CK3? [ __ ] commander 3. I have no idea. I guess actually that kind of makes sense though. I guess cuz when we think about Pan-Arabic or Pan-Aarab nations, they all spoke Arabic and I guess that was the uniting thing even though sometimes they could be of different ethnic groups as well maybe. Yeah, Turk I think is the group of people, but that's I think that's much broader or not necessarily Turkish people. Turk is the um is an ethnic group, but there could be a lot of different I don't know. Like I only dipped into the Armenian genocide [ __ ] because it came up over the Iran stuff. I was reading a lot of my trip. I don't think it seems like basically nothing happened in Persia in World War I like that people found oil there. So I think like Russia and Britain and for a while the German Empire but then they died because they suck kind of like divided it up and were fighting over kind of halves of it. But basically not like [ __ ] all kind of happened I guess other than people kind of chopping up territory and trying to figure [ __ ] out. There's one agreement I think that I want to read about that um is probably important. What was it called? It's not the Russo British Persia. That doesn't make any sense. I'm just saying the three words. There's some agreement that they made. Um, oh, Crusader Kings 3, but it seems kind of relevant. Someday I'll look it up. Don't care. Oh, actually, it's probably in here somewhere. Oh, the Anglo-Russian Convention is what I was thinking of. If you have like five free hours, Kraut did a three-part video series on the history of Turkey. Listen, I love you and I love all the videos and I love Kraut, but I like to just I like to do the reading on my own because it's hard. I don't like to go by other people's interpretations of things. So, I like to read it on my own, get some kind of foundation of knowledge and then from there um from there I'll branch out and listen to other people. Like technically even the wiki is a little bit biased. It's funny because for Israel and the history of Israel, there's a lot of sourcing and there's a lot of fighting back and forth on the history obviously because the history of is of great concern to a lot of people. Um, but for a lot of the Persian stuff, people clearly don't give as much of a [ __ ] Same thing with the Ye uh Yemen history as well. I guess just maybe the Israel history. I'm sure a lot of European history is also hotly contested if I were to do like history of Germany and all that [ __ ] but Jesus, the new congressional library. There's 43 pages of debate on the Holocaust Wiki article. They tried to move it again. Nice. Holy [ __ ] This is a picture of the um classified documents in one of the bathrooms at Mara Lago. Just Brandon was just curious if you responded to a certain subreddit post. Wait, what? Why do people talk cryptically in my chat like I'm not reading it? What do you think of the most unbiased books in the history of Israel? Anything written by Steven Bonell. Bonelli Stein II. I keep hearing the claim of you calling Pisco a communist. Uh, no. I don't think Pisco is a communist. I just feel like there's a lot of weird political partisan stuff that is going on with that group. So, I'm just I just don't want to be involved in it or try to figure it out or waste any brain power on it. Um, the uh apparently the Zohan I should learn his name. I don't I don't actually know. I'm not trying to. Is it Zoran? It's not Zoran. Is it Zoran Mani today? Unbelievable. This is our future now, guys. Now that a Muslim won eight months after launching this campaign, left ear only with the vision of a city that every New Yorker could afford. I still want to know. I still want to know the chain of like custody on these videos. Like everything today records two channel a like what are you recording on where this even happens? I'm so curious. Just kidding. Actually, I know exactly what happened cuz they're recording on a real microphone. This goes to a mixer. It's single channel audio and they just dump the audio very crudely onto some device, not realizing this is just one channel and then they just upload it with a video, I guess. I don't know. We have won. We have won. Wait, sorry, real quick. I'm so sorry. Somebody said the Ottoman Empire banned slavery after Cuba banned slavery. Wouldn't be surprised if his son's family owns slaves. Other Arab countries banned slavery much later. I I don't like to I don't like to talk about slavery. Um because I'm white and that's a very proud part of I'm just kidding. I see you in the Cordox. Um you should be very careful when you talk about slavery because slavery means very different things to very different groups of people. Um just always be aware of that. I don't think it's good to say like American slavery versus, you know, like Ottoman Empire slavery versus Cuban slavery versus whatever slavery. Different people treated slavery in different ways. So just always be aware of that when somebody's saying they ended slavery this year. They ended slavery this way. Well, these people ended slavery. You know, somebody said Arab slavery was much worse. Um different just there were different I don't even know if I would even strictly compare them. There were aspects of American slavery that were uniquely crazy horrible. Um and there were aspects of other types of slavery that were horrible as well. For the if you're talking about like the Arab stuff where they would like castrate the little boys sometimes and keep them as other people like that's pretty [ __ ] Um, I do believe I think that America was the only country to do like wholesale chatt slavery. Like when you're born black, you're a slave. You will grow up, have a family, they will all be slaves, and then you will die a slave and then they will do like that form of slavery, I think, was uniquely American, which is kind of crazy. Um, because nobody else I don't think like people had other forms of like indentured servitude or like being taken as a slave after a war you would lose. Um but the idea of like wholesale racially based cattle slavery I think was a uniquely um American thing. Also this is I know enough history now to always know that statements like this are never true. Okay. At Destiny the Greek expulsions happened after Greece invaded Turkey to annex the Greek majority parts of the country into Greece. There's I have not studied yet a single thing in history where the invasions are like wholly one-sided with no justification or no back and forth or nothing else going on. I feel like there's I feel like history is very messy and there's always some back and forth [ __ ] Not to say that what you're saying is strictly wrong. Like I haven't I'm not into the history of Turkey. So this might be there might be this might be a true statement, but be careful with stuff like that. Okay. Okay. Sorry. We have won from Harlem to Bay Rich. We have won from Jackson Heights to Port Richmond. We have won. From Masp to Chinatown, we have won because New Yorkers have stood up for a city they can afford. A city where they can do more than just struggle. The craziest thing for this is um this is 13 hours ago, so I don't know if this includes this morning he was saying that in New York they were going to legalize rape for Jewish people. What the [ __ ] I was like, "Seriously?" But he said it was only for the ones living in Brooklyn. So I was like, "Okay, I guess." But I'm just kidding. I'm just kidding. One where those who toil in the night. Also, listen. Okay. As tempting as it is sometimes, okay? It's fun to be unhinched by everybody. Uh, we looked up on stream the globalize the inifat thing. I heard this over and over again and until I looked it up, my assumption was that he said, "We need to globalize the inifat." I don't believe he ever said that. I think people were asking him about like would you defend that statement or something or how do you feel about it? And then he did the [ __ ] pro Paly meandering thing, but I don't think it was him saying like we need to globalize the Iniva. That's what I whenever time I read like headlines or when I read people saying this, that's what I was led to believe. And I don't believe um I don't believe that was ever the case. Night can enjoy the fruits of their labor in the day where hard work is repaid with a stable life. Yeah, we watched it. It was on the bull work where Tim Miller asked him about it. Yeah. Eight hours on the factory floor or behind the wheel of a cab is enough to pay the mortgage. It is enough to keep the lights on. It is enough to send your kid to school. Where rent-stabilized apartments are actually stabilized. Where buses are fast and free. I'm probably the most pro-Pali person in the chat, but his statement on October 8th was kind of bad. Listen, okay, October 8th is like old battle net chat logs. Okay, we just don't we don't look at that. We don't think about that, okay? Where child care doesn't cost more than and where public safety keeps us truly safe. So, what's your take on Zoron? Zoron, Zoe, Zo, Zoron, right? He seems to have said a lot of cringe around 2020 and control [ __ ] but some of his more recent comments trying to appeal to Neo [ __ ] libs like us seems good. He supports single-stair housing reform, easier to build housing, smaller lots, expansion buildings. Um I mean like my take on this is basically going to be the same um as any further left candidate. Like Magga has a huge problem with authoritarian rule right now. I don't think we haven't seen that with any left-leaning people. So the idea of him trying to rule like a dictator I don't think can

happen. So if there's like a crazy far-left policy, I would say the same thing about him as I did about Kla Harris. I just don't think it'll come to pass. Like I was never ever for a microcond; I was never ever worried about Kamala or Biden doing like a wealth tax, cuz it would be a disaster, and I know it's never going to happen. Like I'm not even—I know that as soon as they would even float the idea, every adviser they had would be like, "Hey, this is actually [ __ ] retire," like, "Oh, [ __ ] Okay, we're not—we'll just stop talking about that."

Um, so I doubt that like this guy is going to [ __ ] destroy New York with far-left policies, you know, as far as like uh boosted rent control and [ __ ] Like in my opinion, all of those types of um or or like the government grocery stores. Uh, in my opinion, those policies are dog [ __ ] I think they're horrible, and I think it would only make things worse. But there's like—there's two things that can happen. Okay, so one—well, there's three things that can happen. One is he just doesn't get the support in the government to do it; two is that he does it, and then he um, you know, it's a [ __ ] miserable failure, and you're like, "Okay, well, look, at least we know this [ __ ] doesn't work"; or three, he does it, and it actually ends up being somewhat successful, and then that's just more data, right? I used to think that um UBI was kind of like a dog [ __ ] concept, but I feel like most of the data that's come out about UBI and places that have tried it—I think most of the data is actually pretty positive. Like it doesn't fully disincentivize people from ever working, and they don't ever get jobs and they just sit at home all day and smoke weed—that that apparently wasn't the outcome I think in any of the places where they tested UBI.

So, you know, um, personally, I think most of the policy stuff is further to the left—is further to the left of me, but I mean, hey, I mean, it's just more data or information to collect, see what happens. Worst-case scenario, government waste a little bit of money for a while. You try something, you see it doesn't work, and then you move on to the next thing. Uh, rent controls obviously [ __ ] are against the public stores thing. Um, just the government getting involved in setting like strict price controls is always very scary because you can kill a lot of your businesses very quickly or kill entire sectors of the economy very quickly like that. So you have to be careful. But again, it's just New York, so it's where the mayor will use their power to reject Donald Trump's fascism. At what point does authoritarians cross the line of which lethal resistance is justified? Um, in the United States, never. Uh, anything they—they ever said about the Second Amendment being to fight against tyranny was a [ __ ] lie. The reality is—the actual reality is it's going to probably be like if somebody's starving, like you have to get to the point where basic needs aren't being met, which is actually a take I've had for a long time. will use their power to reject Donald Trump's fascism to stop mass ICE agents from deporting our neighbors and to govern our city as a model for the Democratic party.

How much power does the New York mayor actually have compared to the city council? My understanding is the New York mayor is one of the most prestigious positions in the United States. I don't know if it would be unfair for me to say I feel like the New York mayor position is more prestigious than the New York governor position and is more prestigious than most Congress positions. Like even being a senator, New York mayor is a—is a really big—that's a really big office in the United States. Um, yeah, the New York mayor, especially post-9/11, is just—that's a huge office in the US. But maybe that'll—maybe it'll recede post-9/11. We don't care about it as much or something. But u—I mean, it's a huge city. It's a very, very, very international city. Everybody in the world that you know comes to the United States wants to see New York City, the Big Apple. There's a lot of diplomatic stuff that happens there and everything. So it's just a huge—Yeah, it's a big city, huge economy. This—a lot of history. Anyone that self-identifies as socialist—never heard of socialist concerns me. I mean, I should. It's pretty cringe. But I mean, hey, listen. He won his election. I think—I think it's foregone at this point, right? Um, the Dems need to learn how to campaign, I think, better. Running Cuomo was a choice. What was Zohan's—uh, or Zo—I'm sorry, I need to stop saying this. What was Zohran's position on the Luigi killing? I don't know. Don't make me look it up because he's probably going to think it was based, even though that's like an obviously super crazy cringe thing.

You think progressives will be less incentivized to vote for Dems now that they've seen one of their candidates win? Yes. Remember the far-left progressives and the socialist communists—no matter what—are not part of the party. Okay. Um, if Cuomo would have won, all of them would be baby raging right now and would be saying like, "Oh no, like I'm not going to vote or I'm going to protest vote or [ __ ] this." None of it matters. Uh, since their candidate won, they're going to vote in the general's forum. But um, I mean, just don't—just you just have to—you just have to phase them out. Just don't listen to them. Don't listen to them. New York City would be the 12th largest economy in the world if it were a country. That's crazy. I heard that your mom would be the 140th largest country in the world if she were a country because of how fat she is.

Do you think the words socialist and capitalist have different meanings between Gen Z and then—and Gen X? Kind of, but it's gotten really cringe because Gen X and above, socialist and communist were like the Soviets. It was like whatever that meant. And then like Gen X to millennialish, like in that time era, communists and socialists just became people who want to do things with the government. Like Obama was called a communist all the [ __ ] time. Um, and then I guess maybe as a result of that or other factors, Gen Z started to be like, "Oh, socialism is actually cool, you know, because we want socialized healthcare." But then now a lot of the young people—at least online—want to be actually socialist. Not just the government does stuff, but like we abolish capital. So, who knows? We need proportional representation to destroy the two-party system. This constant infighting for how the party should act or is defined really feels ineffective. No, people just need to keep their eye on the prize. People need to keep their eye on the prize, and you just have to—everybody needs to be on the same page for that.

Um, my guess is going to be—I haven't dug a lot into the policies of either because I'm not in New York. My guess is going to be I would have preferred uh Cuomo—I probably—or some like establishment Dem because those are just the type of people I like over the Zohran guy. Uh, but if I lived in New York City, I'm showing up all day to vote for Zohran. I'm never considering ever any MAGA alternative. It's not even remotely close to that. You should be able to brutally—brutal as [ __ ] infight when it comes to primaries because that's what primaries are for. But then once the primary is over, then you say, "Okay, fighting's over. Off to the general." Um, we kind of used to do that, right? I think Hillary campaigned for Obama. That was a very brutal primary. That was Hillary's election. It was literally, for all the coronation memes, that was it. And then Obama was a [ __ ] nobody. A lit—a literal whal. He came out of nowhere. And then all of a sudden, Hillary lost that primary. And it was insane. Um, same thing with Trump. Everybody hated Trump in the Republican primary. He was making fun of people's wives and calling people [ __ ] [ __ ] Not [ __ ] but basically. And then u—and they all came out and then they endorsed and Phone Bank, right? There's the videos of—of Cruz phone banking for Trump afterwards as well.

Adams and Cuomo may both run as independents in the general. Um, I don't know how the New York elections turn out, but if it is the case, I don't actually even know how I feel about that. I was going to say if it is the case that New Yorkers vote like 90% Dem and then they want to run as an independent, that's fine. Maybe if there's any risk that a Republican could win though, then you say absolutely not. Why the [ __ ] would you even risk that? But also, I still—I don't even know if—I don't even know if they should. Even if—I mean, like, you had your primary. The—So, I ran E1. Like, I mean, that's your—this is your primary. This is what the primary is for. Zohran won the primary, and now you back the candidate—is what you should be doing, right? I'm not Jewish, but ever since October 7th happened and seeing anti-Jew behavior online and stuff like the Washington shooting, I feel like Jews have legit reason to be afraid.

Do you think Zohran would enable more extremists on the far left? I want to support him, but I'm a little hesitant. I don't know if he would enable them. I doubt he's going to do much to curb them, though. Um, I think if you're a Jew, I think anti-semitism should be a pretty spooky thing right now for you. Um, the George Floyd thing had a—had the entire country uh, you know, protesting and rioting for months, and like we're having like Jewish people assassinated now in the United States by clearly anti-semitic and now pro-Palestinian driven people, and actually nobody gives a [ __ ] Nobody cares at all. So that's kind of a spooky world to be in, I think. And you have um a lot of anti-semitism now on the left, and the—the right has a good foundation for anti-semitism um in the far right, although the main party doesn't do the anti-semitic stuff as much yet. But Destiny, they have rank-choice voting. Oh yeah, someone on the seat got mad because I mentioned that um I—I knew friends in Canada who did like—who talked about strategic voting for rank-choice voting, and they were like Canada's rank-choice voting. I think Canada—they must have it for something because I had Canadian friends talking about—I think Canada had rank-choice voting just for the—for the—after Trudeau stepped down or something. I think they had it for like one thing. Lol. Destiny trying so hard to stay middle on this one. I don't—how—how long could you have ever watched my stream, but you think I would try to stay in the middle on literally anything? I don't know why you would ever think that. Yes. Sometimes I wake up and I think, "How can I make the broadest?" There's a lot of things that make New York City special. The broadest amount of people happy credit for as far as article 5 look. Oh, my left ear again. When I came here, um, should Blacks be concerned about Black fatigue rhetoric popping up? What does Black fatigue mean again?

Do you think anti-semitism is going to be a threat to secular goypassing Jews or people with partial Jewish blood? I don't know how people identify Jews or not. I'm not sure. Is it just by last name? I don't—I needed to spend more time in my edgy racial phase because I don't—I'm really bad at—Some people have like the—the ethnic radars and [ __ ] Molina was really good at that, but I—not because she was a Nazi, but because she was European. I think Europeans see the different white races way better than I think Americans on average—kind of definitely me. So I came here because it was something I'm supposed to be doing, but I left here a little bit different—differently. I said uh—I—I watched the heads of these countries get up and the Eric Adams vote verse Zohran in the general. If you had to vote in this election, who are you backing? It's this just like not even a—it's just like not even remotely a close consideration. Like I would post-date a ballot in case I got murdered to vote for anybody over Eric Adams. Basically love—and the—the heads of these countries get up and the love and the passion that they showed for their country was unbelievable. I've never seen quite anything like it. The—they want to protect their country, and they need the United States, and without the United States it's not going to be the same, and you can ask uh Mark or you can ask any of the people that were there—it was really moving to see it—they love their country; they were so respectful of me because I'm the head of the United States—and it made—you know, the king of Saudi Arabia when I was in—I was in the Middle East—so I was in Qatar for a different reason—not a reason to get shot at. We're in there for economic development reasons. Qatar, UAE, and Saudi Arabia. All three leaders of those countries. And we took back 5.1 trillion dollars into the United States. All three leaders said, "You know, you're presiding over the hottest country in the world. The United States right now is the hottest. Everybody wants to be there. Everybody." Also, not sure if you saw, but the Bronx really did not support Zohran. Do you think Adams has a shot to beat him in the election or is he cooked? Um, I don't know. Not sure, actually. I don't know what the racial breakdown is of New York for who supports who or whatever, but I'm pretty sure Zohran was carried primarily by like wealthy white college and wealthy white um suburb voters, but I mean—not suburb, I shouldn't say suburb, but that—that's what I saw posted online, unless that was a meme, but that's also not surprising. Remember like the socialist views and all that. As much as people try to say like Malcolm X was a socialist and Black people actually love socialism, it's—it's a very white um college kid flavored thing. Not to say whether it's good or bad. That sounds bad. But everybody wants a piece of it. He said, "A year ago, your country was dead. You had a dead head running it. You had a country that was dead." And it was dead. You had people pouring through the borders. It had inflation. You had everything. He said, "You've made it in five months at that time. You've made it the hottest country. This is the hottest country in the world. United States right now is the hottest country in the world." And when I was around that table, it was a nice uh group of people.

Zohran did better with men and Cuomo with women for some reason. I don't want to—I don't know if we went over this stream or not. I don't want to speak out on the Cuomo stuff cuz I haven't researched it too much, but from what I read of the Cuomo stuff, the—the quote-unquote 12-15 sexual harassment things or whatever, it kind of seemed a little meme. Maybe there was really bad stuff in there that I just didn't see, but it seemed kind of like old-person harassment—like called, you know, like was saying like a girl was hot or commented on her breast or whatever while he was in office. And a lot of these like were over the past like 20 years or something. Um, not to say that it's acceptable or good. Obviously, you shouldn't do that, but it felt like when I first read about all that stuff, my assumption for a long time is that he like [ __ ] was like touching on, you know, like 10 or 15 different women, was like trying to finger [ __ ] them or something. But it kind of seemed a little meme. Maybe some of them in there, like I'm—I'm not—I'm being serious. I haven't looked into these. So maybe some of them were really bad. I'm not sure. Many of whom I knew from previous—when I saw the passion they had for the country. Almost everyone—and you probably have the tapes, it was very public—but almost every one of them said, "Thank God for the United States. Without the United States, we couldn't—they couldn't really have NATO. It wouldn't work. It wouldn't work. It will in the future because now they're paying much more money. But uh—it—it wouldn't work." It was great. Oh [ __ ] Are people figuring out how to appeal to Trump? It's just a matter of how do you play the leader now? Um, having a bunch of people going up to Trump and being like, "We can't do this. We're actually—it's impossible without the—the might and glory of the United States. It's been so important for our past. Like you guys are just so great and amazing. There's no way we can survive without you," like—is the way to appeal to his um—his narcissistic side. Jesus. I wonder if there's a—I wonder if there's a world where Ukraine starts like building like Trump launchers for some of their missiles and they start like labeling [ __ ] that way or something. Um, I wonder if uh Trump would feel differently about Ukraine. And I left here differently. I—I left here saying that these people really love their countries. It's not a ripoff, and we're here to help them protect their country. Okay, we'll do one or two more. Thank you, Mr. President. A question on Spain. Are you satisfied with uh today—Oh, I think Spain's terrible—what they've done. No, I do. They're the only—Yeah. And the NATO summit was in the Netherlands, and the Trump whisperer has shown how to do it. Things like every paragraph needs to contain a reference to Trump. Yeah. Wait, what was the text message from the—calling him daddy or whatever? What was the context of this? Uh, do they—Oh, I think Spain's terrible—what they've done. No, I do. They—They're the only country that won't pay the full. They want to stay at 2%. I think it's terrible. And you know, they're doing very well. The economy is very well. And that economy could be blown right out of the water with something bad happen. You know, Spain is the only country that—Are you from Spain? Good. Congratulations. You're the only country that is not paying. I don't know what the problem is. It's—I think it's too bad. Wait, what? So, we'll make it up. You know what we're going to do? We're negotiating with Spain on a trade deal. We're going to make them pay twice as much. And I'm actually serious about that. We're going to make Spain—I like Spain. I have so many people from Spain that—it's a great place, and they're great people. But Spain is—is uh the only country out of all of the countries that refuses to pay. And you know, oh, they didn't agree to the 5% thing. There has to be a Donald Trump manipulation handbook that's being passed around in global political spaces by now. Probably. Yeah. So they want a little bit of a free ride, but NATO head is the best. Copy of NATO's Mark Rutte's text message to Donald Trump. Mr. President, dear Donald. Is this the guy that we saw speaking to Trump who was supposed to be the Trump whisperer? Mr. President, dear Donald. Yes. Okay. Yeah, that guy was—Oh my god, it's so pathetic, but watching him. Um, in case you forgot. Oh my god. I wonder if it hurts for him to do this. Oh, six hours ago. Oh, so he was at this thing as well. [ __ ] Is there the older video before? I don't know how to do date formats for the before thing. Before 2025 061. There's no way that'll work. I don't know how to—I don't know what the [ __ ] format is. Kill me. Destiny Netherlands. I got to know him very well. We had a great relationship—always. Mark Rutte—now he's secretary general of NATO and doing a fantastic job. Everybody—every report I've gotten is what a great job he did, and I'm not at all surprised uh when I hear it. We had to support him, and we supported him as soon as I heard the name. But he was a fantastic prime minister, and he's doing a fantastic job. An even tougher job—which is tougher—being the prime minister of Netherlands or this job is quite tough. I would think this is—but the politics is also rude. So—but this is pretty tough. You're doing—you're doing good about trade and various other things, and uh—I think we'll have a very, very strong day. We're

Going to have lunch afterwards; that'll go, and then we'll see you all later.

But Mark, would you like to say something?

Yeah. But first of all, thank you so much, Mr. President, again for hosting me and but also for taking time in Florida a couple of weeks after you were reelected.

That's right.

Uh, and of course, our phone call a couple of weeks ago and um, I must say, 45. With all due respect, BB is the Trump whisperer.

Um, I know that this is like literally just because I'm such a contrarian, this is the most unpopular position to have because uh, pro and anti-Israelis hate me for saying it, but um, Israel captivated the West because of their story, and both Israel and anti-Israel people severely overestimate Israel's ability to do propaganda or communicate with anybody.

Um, I don't know if Jews just can't talk to non-Jewish people or whatever, but no, Netanyahu is not the Trump whisperer. Trump just came in loving Israel.

Um, I don't think Netanyahu is very good at finagling American leaders at all. If anything, it should be evidenced by Trump lashing out on him on [ __ ] social media so much. The audio being only in one ear is due to a standard in TV news. Voiceover audio goes on A1 and background noise on A2 usually gets flattened for air.

Wow. You basically, you originated the fact that in Europe we now spending when you take it to aggregate 700 billion more on defense than when you came in office in 2016 and 2017. But that was strength, 45. But then when you look at 47, what happened the last couple of weeks is really staggering. The Europeans committing to a package of 800 billion defense spending. The Germans now potentially up to half a trillion extra in defense spending. And then, of course, you had K star here, the British prime minister and others all committing to much higher defense spending. We're not there. We need to do more. But I really want to work together with you in relative to the DH summit to make sure that we will have a NATO which is really reinvigorated under your leadership.

Uh, and we are getting there. We also discuss uh defense production because we need to produce more weaponry. We're not doing enough and not in the US, not in Europe. Um, and we are lacking behind when you compare to the Russians and the Chinese. And you have a huge defense industrial base. Europeans buy four times more here than the other the other way around, which is good because you have a strong defense industry, but we need to do more there to make sure that we are amp up the the production and kill.

Wow. Do you think Zilinski doesn't know how to handle Trump or just has too many things stacked against him?

Um, Zalinsky probably has an issue because Zilinsky lives like a lot of people live in a delusional reality right now. Even people that do politics live in a delus delusional reality. Like remember if you're in the West um and this applies to a lot of you [ __ ] retards as well. You guys think that your schools are completely and totally unaffordable. That your healthcare is the worst it's ever been in the entire world. That you can't afford anything.

Um, as you continue to take loans out for [ __ ] Uber Eats and [ __ ] Like you guys literally think you live in a hellhole hellscape that politicians have to desperately come out and try to rectify somehow because life is going to [ __ ] So that's what everybody in the west thinks. And then Zalinski is literally watching his country being torn apart like in an actual existential war where they've lost 20% of the territory of the country to a debatably genocidal maniac who is trying to rebuild an old empire. So for Zolinsky to step out of his world and then to come to the west and speak, I imagine it's probably incredibly challenging. um because he's going from about as real as the world gets to the fantastic Westland delusional place that we live right now, and yeah, I imagine it's probably very difficult for him to make the transition, but also um that meeting was poised against him regardless, like I think he went into that meeting with everybody against him already, Trump and Vance for sure, so oh sorry anyway, this guy was funny, but um this guy can can butter Trump's biscuit, this was his text message to Trump: Mr. President, dear Donald, congratulations and thank you for your decisive action in Iran. That was truly extraordinary and something no one else dared to do. It makes us all safer. You are flying into another big success in the H this evening. It was not easy, but we've got them all signed on to 5%. Donald, you have driven us to a really, really important moment for America and Europe and the world. You will achieve something no American president in decades could get done. Europe is going to pay in a big way, as they should, and it will be your win. Safe travels and see you at His Majesty's dinner. Mark Rut Jesus at Destiny.

As someone who is no longer Muslim but comes from a Muslim family, I appreciate the tweet you made defending Zoran from Charlie Kirk. While I dislike the tenus of Islam and it should be criticized, I feel at least on Twitter a lot of hate is directed towards Muslims and not Islam. I don't know if my tweet is necessarily defending Zoran. It's more Charlie Kirk has no [ __ ] place um to ever criticize anybody for some religious [ __ ] And I think that attacking people based on their religion in the United States is one of the most anti-American things um I I think a person can do. So [ __ ] Charlie Kirk and [ __ ] him and [ __ ] the weird theocratic Christianity extremist [ __ ] that a lot of these guys push as well, his majesty.

Well, that was about the dinner Trump was going to, not This is also the glaze message template Mike Cuckabe used. No, Mike is a religious [ __ ] fanatic. Different thing there. I think Hassan was expecting the um all of the profile pieces that he did to launch him into some kind of like to get him more access, I think, to mainstream political people. So, it's been funny. or or mainstream people in general. It's been funny on Twitter. He's like begging to join like everything. You see him with the musicians or the celebrities or everything else. And now he wants to join this. If someone wants to actually serve NY15 and the people in it instead of the apartheid state of Israel, I will be there to help you win. I will knock on doors with you. Let me know at Dem Socialists. He's such a cringe [ __ ] to do this after Zoran wins the primary. Like he's such a [ __ ] scum [ __ ] opportunist. Ugh.

But why is that anti-American? We've been fighting other people about religion since before the Declaration of Independence. Because America is supposed to be a country where you of all creeds and all religions and all backgrounds are allowed to be here and do and worship whatever cringe god they want.

Gurgitated. They're like, "Oh, yes. Uh uh the rent freeze. Uh what it's like, bro, you don't have a house. Like, what do you mean a rent freeze terrifies you? Are you a [ __ ] landlord? No. What are you talking about? Did you know that rent freezes were done in the past by other [ __ ] mayors in New York? No. You don't know anything. You just [ __ ] heard someone on TV say this is terrifying and it will cause a capital flight. And you're just regurgitating that cuz you're a [ __ ] baboon.

Okay. Okay, take it in. Somebody linked ads that this guy did. There's a lot of things that make New York City special. For me, it's the delies and bodegas. Habibi, could I get an egg and cheese on a roll with jalapeno? One's doing special coming up. Small businesses employ nearly half of all New Yorkers in the private sector. They keep the city running. But the last four years have been hard. We've seen the dollar slice go extinct. Storefront after storefront closed and had a mayor in Eric Adams who has ignored the struggles of small businesses. That's why as mayor, I'm going to make it faster, easier, and cheaper for small businesses to get started and stay open. First, we're going to cut fines and fees for small businesses by 50%. Regulations are important, but small businesses have to navigate more than 6,000 of them with far fewer resources than the big chains. That's why as mayor I'll appoint a momand pop zar with the clear goal of making it easier to run a small business. $1,000 isn't a lot to our city government, but it can be make or break for a small business trying to get opinion on him buttoning his top button without a tie. True. Get off the ground. Next, we're going to permit application. The mom and pop star will coordinate with agencies to speed up turnaround times, cut red tape, and let New Yorkers start businesses sooner because you shouldn't have to fill out 24 forms and go through seven agencies to start a barber shop. But most of all, we're putting our money where our mouth is by increasing funding for small business support programs with 500%. We're going to invest $20 million in our business express service teams, which pairs small businesses with a city case manager that helps them navigate permits and regulations, as well as connecting them with programs that provide them with financial and legal assistance. Right now, only 3% of businesses are using these programs. We want that number to skyrocket. The only thing more in New York than an egg and cheese are the small businesses that make them. Together we can not only protect them but encourage new ones to make a home in our city.

You know who he kind of what he reminds me of. Um, I'm probably only saying this because I just watched this movie. No good. Don't touch it, Ty. Look at me. Okay, I ask you a question. You have to think of the answer. And where do you look? No good. You look down, they know you're lying. And up, they know you don't know the truth. Don't use seven words when four will do. Don't shift your weight. Look always at your mark, but don't stare. Be specific, but not memorable. Be funny, but don't make him laugh. He's got to like you, and then forget you the moment you've left his sight. And for God's sake, whatever you do, don't under any circumstances.

Yeah. Can you take a look at this? What was he going to say here? I feel like one thing this guy does well is he seems like an ordinary normal person who's not like trying really hard to be like a fellow kids. Um, some people try, I think, way too hard, and then other people are I feel like right now we're kind of in a moment where people are just like looking to like kind of normal people. This is the vibe I get from him. I'm going to make and part of that one um thing that we watched. I also felt that way. The part of the debate admittedly I haven't consumed a lot of stuff from this guy though. But take it in. A true icon of New York, the Staten Island Ferry. The Staten Island Ferry is a beacon on the waters of New York City. Like I get big um watching these ads, I get big um like high school student council president video from a top of the class kid who's trying hard to make a cute video for. So, it's like it's like it's done with a team that thought about doing it, but like the music and everything is like kind of cute or whatever, you know? I don't know if that makes sense. Take it in. A true icon. It's like parks and wreck a little bit. Yeah, that vibe. The Staten Island Ferry. The Staten Island Ferry is a beacon on the waters of New York City, shuttling about 45,000 people a day. And the best part, it's free. For decades after opening in 1898, the Staten Island Ferry was just a nickel. Then, in the 1970s, the fair rose to a quarter and in 1990, 50 cents. But since 1997, the ferry's been free. And New Yorkers have come to know it as a dependable means of transit. And it's the best way to see the Statue of Liberty. So when people say buses can never be free, don't ask them to take a hike. Ask them to take the ferry. On June 24th, let's get some more free transit. What is this rap video? Make you a countryside six years ago. Curry. My name is Pine. Hello everyone. Pound and a half of chicken. Stir and fry it again. Mom, you're living in our house now. Mom, we're not living in yours. Why do I have to keep telling you this? And then on Wednesday, you forget to pick up Nikl from school. All of your meddling and these questions and the TV series who cause you to lose sight of the fact that you are not a good nanny. I'm the best damn nanny that you ever done. See, [ __ ] top five nannies and [ __ ] top three. I'm the number one ny. Don't [ __ ] with me. [ __ ] any of the 90s as they better than Bravine. Cuz I'm 85 years old. 85 years old. 85 years with my family on my back. So outlast everybody on my [ __ ] haters. Don't know me now then you never know me later. Say in an elevator at the top going find your own way. Drink another water for me. Not just anyone but the [ __ ] mirror at the top where a base got a great man in the sh just in case.

Okay. What was this? This is October 8th post. My statement on the last 36 hours across Israel and Palestine. I warned the hundreds of people killed across your own Palestine in the last 36 hours and inheration of war and the Israeli government's decision to cut electricity Gaza and Knesset members calling for another knock but will undoubtedly lead to more violence and suffering the days and weeks to come. The path towards Ajust and lasting peace can only begin by ending the occupation of dismantling apartheid.

Sure, it was kind of cringe. Could be worse though. Could be a lot worse. It's a little cringe, but it could be a lot worse.

All right. It's not being appreciated just how radical Zoron's expressed views were just a short time ago and how little he's addressed them. He had a full-on committee on ending capitalism, defunding police, ending exam schools, decarceration, and embracing racial conflict. How old is this from 2020? I mean, he seems kind of young. You could change a lot in five years.

No. Um, is he young? He looks like he's like [ __ ] 30. 33. Okay. Yeah.

Uh, one thing that I don't believe is true, I've never seen this work successfully, is people who pretend that candidates can like run on like stealth views and that they'll all come out after they take office. If somebody's running on one set of views and you're accusing them of secretly harboring another set of views, if they were to try to exercise the secret set of views once they're in office, they would lose all their populist support and no one would would support them anymore. So, um this like this is what he said 5 years ago and this is what he's about, you know.

Um I I don't I don't ever buy that. This a thread mostly of tweets mostly of years old. So surely has changed in some ways with the political moment. But I want you to think about the kind of person who says these things. Are they contemplative? Are they collaborative? Are they prone to conflict? What was his role before hitting winning the primary? or what did he what was his job? He was in the New York State Assembly. Okay. Since 2021.

What about Trump? What about Trump? Trump has been super open about all of his views from day zero. I mean, what do you mean? Project 2025. What about it? Trump has openly said all of these things forever. Nothing is I don't think there was anything surprising that happened um for any of that. He spotted the 2020 uprising sharing a post dismissing concerns about property damage from riots. Politicians opponents condemn the uprising Minneapolis from TV studio as well. Those at the center of it, even those who are hurting understand why it's happening and why it has to happen. Black press. Okay, this is I don't care about this. This is cringe. Why does he tilt his head? Does he have a problem though? What do you mean? Does every single girl who posts on Instagram have a problem? Has he though? Wasn't he distancing himself from Project 2025? He Trump distanced himself from it such that he said, "I don't support Project 2025." But like I'm pretty sure every policy in there and everything relating to it are all things that he said since before the election and that he's tried it on after the election. He just says it like, "Oh, I don't support Project 2025 or whatever. in an unearthed rap song. I always like when people say like unearthed, like was this something that was super ultra buried or did they just like find this on an open YouTube channel? There's a reason people thought he was the peace president. He conceals his stuff but in front of your face. No, it's because Republicans specifically message like that because they're a [ __ ] cult.

In an unearthed rap song, New York City mayoral candidate Zoran Mdani praised five convicted terror funders. The five funneled 12 million to Hamas. Mdani sends his love to them. Track released in 2017. Also called to tear down the US border wall. So he would have been 25 when he released this video. Wow. In 2017, Zoran Mdani released a rap track that praised five convicted Hamas funders known as the Holy Land 5. Now he wants to run New York. Mom Donnie says, "Look him up." So we did. These five men were convicted of funneling over $12 million to Hamas. US designated terrorist organization responsible for the murder, rape, and kidnapping of civilians, including Americans. Mom Donnie sent his I like how you have to have that in there to make to make Americans give a [ __ ] for the murder, rape, and kidnapping of civilians. Hold on. Wait, wait, wait, wait. Don't let me lose you yet. Not just any civilians, including Americans. American Dani sent his love to convicted Hamas funders. Let that sink in. No, no wall. Build it up. We'll make it fall. Mamani says no wall, we'll make it fall. That's an open door for criminals and chaos. Zoran Mani stands with convicted terrorist funders and wants open borders. This is New York City, not a sanctuary for terrorists. Zoran Mandani, unfit, unamerican, unthinkable.

Jeez. Campus hate is out of control. We expose those who promote anti-semitism, glorify terror, or feel extremism because the world deserves to know Jesus. Everybody stop what you're doing. If you're watching my stream, stop what you're doing and listen to this. I'm howling. And the president looks over at me, puts the foreign leader on mute, and says, "This is not going very well." And he presses the red button and and I my eyes get really big and I'm like, "Mr. President, you know what? What just happened?" And he's he looks at me and he goes, "Nuclear nuclear And two minutes later, a guy walks in with a Diet Coke and he looks back at me and he says, "It wasn't nuclear. It's just the Diet Coke button." And that's So that's the kind of guy, my fellow Republicans, that we have as the president of the United States. That's [ __ ] epic, dude.

Okay. Wait, which laugh is better? One or two? One. I think one is better because it's shorter. Hold on. I need this. I got to get this. I got to get this activated. I think this hot sauce might be illegal now. Wait, do I cover this yet? Hold on. This will surely garner national support for democratic socialism and in no way detract from addressing material suffering. What is this? Okay, ladies and gentlemen, the new mayor of New York City. And yes, that is a 911 was an inside job t-shirt. Is it? This is not a 911 inside job shirt. It is literally a shirt titled Internet. Welcome to the web of misinformation. That faux browser window is a reference to misinformation spread about 911. Oh, nice. So, the guy literally did the thing the shirt is accusing him of. Internet paradise. Welcome to the worldwide web of disinformation. Did jet fuel melt steel beams? The funny thing is is I wonder if Hassan is wearing it ironically, which is like a double triple metal meta. Oh [ __ ] we got that prison drip. Hey, didn't see you there. Congrats though to Zoran Mdani. It's not over yet, but it's looking like he won the mayoral race in New York City. We were all over every burrow today seeing people super excited to go out and vote. I supported him because he's the only non-Zionist candidate on that stage. I thought he needed to be bought and sold, but people are energetic. People are tired of the Zionism. And I'm excited to see what he's got. I'm not a socialist myself. I don't

Want everyone to be a communist getting free stuff, but I think he has some cool ideas. Hopefully, he can do the best, man. And I wish you the best of luck if you do win. New York is with you, and we want you to do well, man.

Hey, didn't see you there. Based, not really, but Sneaker is kind of [ __ ] but that's okay. This this Okay, I wish to Yo's not very clean on it. Maybe I'll switch out in the future. Okay, I need that though. My What is this? How prolific was this guy's rap career? What the [ __ ] Nine years ago. Too much. His mom is a really big filmmaker. Colbear interview. Is it weird that I spent out people take STD tests regularly? Do you know people who've never willingly taken one? I'm sure there are some who haven't, but if you're if you have multiple partners, if you're sleeping around semi-often, it's probably good to get tested fairly regularly.

Hey everybody, welcome back. Hey ladies and gentlemen, my next guest tonight are two account two candidates who want to be the next mayor of New York. Please welcome New York State Assemblyman Zoran Mandani and New York City comptroller Brad Lander.

Just do what I can. There's another way that Eric Adams wins. Um, how does [ __ ] actually, I don't even know. Was Eric Adams part of the primary or is the current is the sitting guy not usually part of the primary? No, he wasn't. Yes, he was. Independent run. He's running as an independent. Oh. Oh, weird, huh? I have no idea what that'll look like then. I don't know how popular he is with most people in the city right now.

G, thank you so much, uh, for joining me here. Uh, each of you are running to be mayor of New York. And to be clear, I am not endorsing either one of you. Okay? In fact, so much so that you guys are going to switch seats a little bit later in this interview. But you're endorsing each other. How how does that work? Why is this for each of you?

Question: Why is this your number two guy?

Well, we both agreed for starters that corrupt abuse of Andrew Cuomo should not be allowed anywhere near city hall. And we know that by teaming up, a majority of New York New Yorkers won't choose him. At the same time, we have a positive vision. You know, when I first met Sauron, he was leading an effort to help taxi drivers who were under crushing debt. Like several had committed suicide, uh, because medallion holders were crushing them with uh with excess debt. So he led a hunger strike, teamed up with people and designed a $450 million debt relief program and has now built on that with a vision for a city that all New Yorkers can afford whoever they are, and I find it inspiring and so I hope folks will rank me number one on their ballot and ranks around number two.

Mr. Mom and I think you know Brad Brad has been a principled and progressive leader in this city for years. So many of the laws that we celebrate in this city are ones that he actually brought to bear. And I'm talking about someone who founded the progressive caucus in the city council. And it's it's it's exciting to know that while each of us think that we will make the next best mayor of New York City, we also understand that it's time for a politics of the future. And that means a politics of collaboration, a politics of sincerity, a politics of principle.

And well, this race, this race in general, Governor Cuomo being in the race, you guys and the other candidates, this has made national news. You both have been interviewed on on the national news networks. Your opponent Andrew Cuomo has been recently endorsed by Representative Jib Klyber of South Carolina, a guy who, you know, basically clinched it for Biden in 2020. Does that matter?

It's funny. I mean, it does. Like I said, I think New York City mayor is like one of the most prestigious political positions to hold in the United States. But it's just funny that like Clyber's endorsement matters for New York mayor. Why do you think this particular race is has become a countrywide story?

I think in some ways because it's a referendum on where our party goes. What we're talking about is a race that has now seen the most funded super PAC in New York City. The idea of co-endorsing in this rank choice system is weird, but the dynamics of this are interesting. Yeah. I don't know how I feel about it. I don't I just I don't I don't feel like I like the this whole rank choice meme and like the meme voting and the strategic voting and everything. I don't know. Municipal history, a race that is, you know, one that billionaires and corporations want to buy. And this is a tale that we're seeing across this country where it's a battle of organized money versus organized people. And ultimately, it's a question for our own party of how do we move forward? Do we move forward with the same politicians of the past, the same policies of the past that delivered us this present? Or do we move forward with a new generation of leadership? One that is actually looking to serve the despite this being despite this being a New York City race, foreign affairs have become part of it partly because this is such a multicultural city. And so I'll ask the same question to both of you. I'll start with you, Mr. Lander. Does the state of Israel have the right to exist?

Uh, I support the vision of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.

Mr. Mdani, same question. Does the state of Israel have the right to exist?

Yes, like all nations, I believe it has a right to exist and responsibility also to uphold international law.

Okay, let's talk about the elephant in the room is that there are many people in New York, even people who would support your candidacy otherwise who don't want to support you. What's the downside? I just like people that are trying to like game the voting system or whatever. I don't know. It just seems weird. Or like people that I don't know. It might not be a big issue at the end of the day. I mean, every system has its issues, I guess, because of the Jewish community's fear of the true and rising anti-semitism, not only around the world, but in this country and shamefully in New York, which is the largest Jewish population of any city other than Tel Aviv in the whole world. If you really want to um Mr. Money, same question. Does the state of Israel have the right to exist?

Uh, I support the vision of Israel as a Jewish democratic state.

Mr. Mdani, same question. Does the state of Israel have the right to exist?

Yes. Like all nations, I believe it has a right to exist and responsibility also to uphold international law.

Okay. Let's talk about the elephant in the room is that there are many people in New York, even people who would support your candidacy otherwise who don't want to support you because of the Jewish community's fear of the true and rising anti-semitism, not only around the world, but in this country and shamefully in New York, which has the largest Jewish population of any city other than Tel Aviv, in the whole world. And they are worried. They're they're very upset by some of the things that you've said in the past. And they are afraid that your mayorship would actually lead to increased anti-semitism that they believe that that would be more dangerous for them. It's kind of a this question is like a very particular one and the signaling is like very subtle and careful. So like this guy over here would be I don't know if he's a pro-Israel candidate but his answer was a pro-Israel answer. I support when people are asking you if um do you support Israel's right to exist? What they're really asking is is do you support Israel's right to exist as a Jewish protected state? And then this guy's answer was yes. And then Mani's answer was no. But he said it in a in a politically correct way. I mean a way you should. But um I think these two guys were friendly for this election. I feel like I saw a lot of stuff on Reddit and Twitter where people are like, "Oh, make sure you put him second and we'll put him second and all this [ __ ] or whatever."

Yeah. What do you say to those New Yorkers who are afraid that you wouldn't be their mayor, that you wouldn't protect them?

You know, I know where that fear is coming from. It's a fear that is based upon the horrific attacks we've seen in Washington DC in Boulder, Colorado. It's a fear all the way from Jews will not replace us to today. And and it's a fear that I hear also from New Yorkers themselves. You know, just a few days after the horrific war crime of October 7th, a friend of mine told me about how he went to his synagogue for Shabbat services and he heard the door open behind him and a tremor went up his spine as he turned around not knowing who was there and what they meant for him. I spoke to a Jewish man in Williamsburg just months ago who told me that the door he left unlocked for decades is now one that he locks. And ultimately this is because we're seeing a crisis of anti-semitism. And that's why at the heart of my proposal for department of can you explain more on how he said no to that question while literally saying yes because he's asking because the question is should Israel exist as a Jewish majority a Jewish protected state. He said yes every nation has the right to exist as long as they comply with international law. This is like a I don't want to call it a dog whistle, but it's a subtle signal to Israel can exist, but it needs to be one person, one vote with every single person um the people in Gaza and the people in Palestine having the same voting rights, which would mean a Jewish minority state, which is obviously the thing that Israel is trying to avoid. That basically that not basically that's what his answer was signaling of community safety is a commitment to increase funding for anti-hate crime programming by 800%. Because to your That's reading it heavily. Nope. I my read is 100% correct. I know it is for a fact and anybody that has dealt any time with this issue and I'm sure he has like 100% that is that was what he was signaling there. To your to your point, anti-semitism is not simply something that we should talk about. It's something that we have to tackle. We have to make clear there's no room for it in this city, in this country, in this world and and no justifications for violence of any kind. No, there there is there is no room for violence in this city, in this country, in this world. And what I have found also for many New Yorkers is an ability to navigate disagreement. You know, I remember the words of Mayor Cotch who said, "If you agree with me on nine out of 12 issues, vote for me. 12 out of 12, see a psychiatrist." And it's also not very like consequential, though, because it's it's the New York May. He's not making foreign policy decisions for us or anything. So, an older Jewish woman come up to me at Bernay Chesher in a synagogue many months ago after a Democratic club forum and she whispered in my ear, "I disagree with you on one issue." How is that a fair reading of international law? What charter says Israel must become a Jewish minority state? Well, because they would say that the occupation of Palestine and Gaza is illegal and if you live within the b the borders of Israel and if Israel is going to claim to rule this territory, then every single person in that territory should have a vote towards the Israeli leadership. Right. In a synagogue many months ago after a Democratic club forum and she whispered in my ear, I disagree with you on one issue. I'm pretty sure you know which one it is and I agree with you on the others and I'm going to be ranking you on your on my ballot. And I say this because I know there are many New Yorkers with whom I have a disagreement about the Israeli government's policies. And also there are many who understand that that's a disagreement still rooted in shared humanity. Because the conclusions I've come to, they are the conclusions of Israeli historians like Amos Goldberg. They are echoing the words of an Israeli prime minister Ahud Mayor who said just recently what we are doing in Gaza is a war of devastation. It is cruel. It is indiscriminate. It is limitless. It is criminal killing of civilians. These are the conclusions I've come to. I mean, can I sure please? I mean, by the way, before you answer, yeah, before you answer, I want to say if we're not able to fill fit everything in this interview on the broadcast, we will put the whole thing up online unedited. Okay, go ahead.

Um, so look, I'm a proud Jewish New Yorker raising two Jewish kids here is the joy of my life. I'm the highest ranking Jewish elected official in New York City government. I'm nervous about rising anti-semitism and also I believe in the humanity and the human rights of Palestinians. Uh and I know that it is I think that by the international law statement he just means he just meant that Israel shouldn't be committing war crimes and is slightly hinting towards the genocide things. No, it it doesn't have anything to do with the genocide thing. It has to do with the one it's I don't know what else to say is that it is what it is. I don't know what to say. His like this guy gave the clear pro Israel answer. Um he gave the I don't know if I would call it the prop pali answer but kind of that one. Yeah. Possible. Um, I I hate what I I support that vision of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state, but I hate what the Netanyahu government is doing in Gaza. And I've been saying that a long time. And look, you know, that's why this guy keeps saying as a Jewish state, as a Jewish state is going to be responsible for what happens in the Middle East. But there is something quite remarkable about a Jewish New Yorker and a Muslim New Yorker coming together to say, "Here's how we protect all New Yorkers." Jews, people don't understand the actual question. Well, these two guys understood the question. That's why they answered the way that they did. Jewish New Yorkers and Muslim New Yorkers are not going to be divided from each other. We build a city where you have affordable housing and good schools and safe neighborhoods for everyone.

Well, Mr. Mani, how do you I'm just curious, how do you think you'd be the first Muslim mayor of New York. How do you think you could build a a a bridge of understanding between the significant Muslim population here in the city and the significant Jewish population here in the city? How could how do you think you could lower tension?

I think by foregrounding that humanity and and in many ways that's the most New York City thing we can do because for so many of us who've grown up in this city difference is something that we celebrate. It's something that we know is actually a part of the fabric of this place that we call home. And you know many years ago I was the campaign manager of a Jewish candidate for state senate and I took him to a mosque in Bay Ridge and after he gave his speech at Friday prayers an older Palestinian man came over to him and he looked at him and he said cousins. And I think that there is this possibility of building a shared life in our city because ultimately that is the story of New York City. It's a shared life of people from across the world and it's one that we know even in the language of the hostage families themselves. Everyone for everyone. We are tied together as one. We have to take a quick break. We have to take a quick break. We're right back with more Bradlander and Toran Mdani.

Hey everybody, welcome back. We're here with Zoran Mani and Controller Brad Lander who are both running for mayor of New York and have cross endorsed each other on the rank choice voting system. Now guys, as I said, I'm not endorsing either one of you. So, would you please switch seats right now?

Very good. All right. Okay. Thank you. Thank you very much. Welcome to the hot seat, friendo.

Okay. Uh Mr. Lander, uh one of the reasons why why you're here is not just because you're uh doing well in the polls, but last week you were handcuffed by ICE for linking arms. People were calling Clobe racist. Wait, what? What? With an immigrant that they attempted to detain. Um first of all, um why was that important for you to do? And as mayor, what ability we have to resist the federal authorities on immigration policy do you think is abusive?

So, I've been going down to immigration hearings for a few weeks now. About a month ago, Department of Homeland Security changed the rules. It used to be that these folks who are coming, who have done everything, right? They registered at the border. They got a hearing date. They showed up expected to be able to say why they're afraid that if they'll be deported, they'll face violence or persecution back home. About a month ago, started dismissing their cases and saying, "You no longer have status as an asylum seeker." They're like bewildered. They leave the courtroom and a gang of ICE agents not wearing uniforms and wearing masks grab some of them uh and essentially disappear them for deportation. Volunteers have been asked to show up at the court, bear witness, try to give them a little know your rights information to let them know they can object, try to connect them to lawyers. And that's what I was doing here. I met that gentleman, Edgardo, and I just took his arm, tried to walk him out of the building five times before. I've been able to get families walked out of the building so they could go back to their neighborhoods. In this case, you saw they grabbed us, separated us. I was in detention for four hours. Edgardo remains in ice detention today. And and as I said, um uh you're the controller of the city. Um what is that? Fair enough. Everything is under control. What come what? What? What do you do? The chief financial officer in New York City managed the $275 billion pension fund that is retirement security of teachers and cops. So, you're the money guy. Okay. You're the money guy and wait a You're the money guy and he's a Democratic socialist. You're you're a socialist endorsing the money guy and the money guy endorsing the socialist guy. How how do socialism not scare you? Cuz socialism scares a lot of people.

I mean, look, I I am a proud progressive and I think that's in the tradition of New York City. I mean, this is an incredible city. Generate so much creativity and energy and wealth and the job of city government and of the money guy is to invest in the public goods that keep that thriving going and then share opportunity so much better and that's what our schools are and our parks are and our libraries are that's what we're paying for with all those dollars and that's the city we love and I think what what Brad has also shown by being the money guy is holding people accountable one of the main reasons that we know that Elon Musk took $80 million out of the city budget was because that was something that Brad discovered and and I think that and we're going to get it back so and at the core of is about actual accountability because what we have is a federal administration in Washington that is authoritarian in its actions and its vision and we deserve leadership here in New York City that is actually an alternative to it, not something that looks like a mirror image of it.

Well, I want to talk about I want to talk about that and I want I want to get back to what what happened down at at the court is okay. So, it is uh expressing its power in an authoritarian way. This administration Trump has said he's sending troops to New York just like he sent to Los Angeles. What I'll start with you, Mr. Leonard, what can you do as mayor similar to what Karen Bass was faced with in Los Angeles. What can you do if there are troops in the streets of New York to protect New Yorkers?

Yeah, well there's a lot we can do to protect New Yorkers. I'll start with the fact that like I was proud to be there for Edgardo, but you know what would have been better for Edgardo was a lawyer and the city of New York should be paying for legal representation for people who are facing deportation so we could deescalate. And what I was proud of in what happened last week was it's in the nonviolent tradition. We are standing up against authoritarianism and we can do it in a way that is

Nonviolent, that deescalates, that shows the best of New Yorkers and the best of Americans. We are going to need to come up with more tactics for doing that.

Hey Jesse, have you seen or are you planning to watch the Johnny Harris video 1955 versus 2025? It covers and compares housing price and other trends. You might have strong opinions on it. Um, there's like other stuff. I'm in very much like history mode at the moment for my brain. Um, I don't think the Johnny Harris guy does very good research. So, if I watch a video of his, I would have to dive into every claim he makes, and I just don't really feel like doing that right now, especially over that topic.

So, that's peaceful protest. That's bearing witness in the courts. And yes, that's keeping a peaceful city. Even if they send the National Guard here, we will not back down. And we will show what New Yorkers are made of in a peaceful way. We've only got a minute here, and and I got to get a couple of other things here. New York is a big old town, okay? It's old. It's not necessarily machine politics like the Chicago that I used to live in. But it's it's there, a lot of bodies buried. You know, still a lot of machine politics. Okay. And one of the thing, one of the things that people say that, you know, the vote for Cuomo is like, he knows where the bodies are buried. He knows how things are done.

Mich, you're 33 years old. You know, a fresh face is very good. New ideas are very good, but why should the city trust someone with so little governmental, especially executive experience, to run the greatest city on earth? No. I think it's a moment for New Yorkers to ask themselves what kind of experience we want. Because what we see in Andrew Cuomo is the experience of resigning in disgrace, the experience of cutting Medicaid, of cutting hundreds of millions of dollars in funding for the MTA, of offending the more than a dozen women who courageously stepped forward to credibly accuse him of sexual harassment. The experience that I offer is one that I'm very proud of. You know, as Brad was saying earlier, I think of the experience of Richard Chow, a taxi driver who lost his brother to suicide, someone who had been sold a dream by the city as a ticket to the middle class. I organized alongside Richard and thousands of working-class taxi drivers, and we won a half a billion dollars in debt relief that brought so many of these drivers back into the dignity that they've been denied. And alongside that, we won the single largest infusion of money for the MTA's operating service. Better Hodge was saying that Mandami is somewhat abundance pill the other day. I don't know enough about it though. Uh, I don't know if that's really true or not. I'm not fully convinced of that. Um, other than he thinks government should work well, but I think that's a pretty hollow take. Um, but I don't know, subways, better bus service, the first of its kind fair-free bus pilot, a track record of fighting for working-class New Yorkers. And ultimately, in this moment, we can also see a glimpse of how we would run the city and the campaigns that we're running.

Well, for both of you gentlemen, what's your relationship with like unions, with with with police? Those are those are the things that run the city. What's your relationship with police?

Well, look, you know, that's my job as controller. I invest their pension funds, and I'm happy to say last year their pension funds were up 10%. I work closely with representatives. Even as we invest in more affordable housing and uh show how you could run the city well.

All right. How about you? What's your relationship like with the police?

You know, it's a relationship where when I've had conversations with rank-and-file officers who've told me that they joined the police force to tackle serious crimes, I've heard their frustrations that they've instead been asked to play almost every single role that city government can imagine. The same people who thought they were signing up to deal with shootings are instead playing the roles of mental health professionals and social workers. And ultimately, it's part of why we see 200 officers leave the department every single month, with about a quarter considering doing so because we're not letting them do their actual jobs. And that's part of our vision. Let the police do the critical work that they do towards creating public safety. Let's create a department of community safety to have dedicated teams of mental health outreach workers and social workers in our subways responding to homelessness and the mental health crisis.

One of the things, and I know we're going to we're going um, you know, uh people, there's an old saw that says just you know, make sure the potholes are filled. Okay. It's what's going on in everyone's neighborhood. People in New York are distraught because there is the city's dirty. There's rats everywhere. There's moped chaos. It's not the top thing on my list, but also cross. Thanks for the kick, host. You know, what what do you do? A lot of empty storefronts around the city. How do you increase the as mayor? What do you do to restore the city to a sense of uh vitality?

Well, yeah. Well, first you need a well-run city government to deliver the services, to pick up the garbage, to keep the streets clean and safe, to run the schools well. So, first you got to sweep out all the corruption that Eric Adams has brought in because we don't have right now top-flight people running every city agency. Think about what it could be as an answer to Donald Trump. Uh, when the next mayor says, "I want the best and brightest here," running that transportation department, running the sanitation department, and making sure we keep the streets clean, safe, the neighborhoods well-run. I'm glad Eric Adams finally decided it was time to start putting the lids on the trash cans. That's a big step forward. You keep the rats. Uh, we will have a rats. Okay. How do you revitalize the city? How do you keep it clean and safe?

No, I think as someone who cares deeply about public goods and the public sector, we have to care just as much about public excellence. We have to deliver the best quality of life in the city. And as Brad is saying, so much of that concern that many New Yorkers have is tied to a systematic underfunding of city agencies. We're talking about a mayor that we're both seeking to replace, who at one point was proposing removing trash cans from some New York City street corners. And that's part of what makes people feel as if they're living in a city that is dirtier, that is less well-run than the one that they know.

Do we have money for that? We do. We do. Do we have money for that?

Well, look, my number one pledge in this campaign. All right. I'm glad you asked. My number one pledge in this campaign is to end street homelessness for people with serious mental illness. We don't have to be a city that has a couple thousand of our mentally ill neighbors. You know what's expensive? Our hospitals and jails. We will actually save money even as we make our city safer.

Um, if Andrew Cuomo loses the primary, he said he'll run as an independent. If you guys lose, if either of you guys lose, will you run as an independent?

My focus is just on June 24th, and I'm confident that we're going to be able to beat Andrew Cuomo and send him back in the suburbs.

Okay. By we, I know you said we, but it really can only be I because only one person can wrestle.

No, we're arm wrestling. Who's who's winning the primary? I'll ask I'll ask you first. I try to arm wrestle for it right here. I'm in the number one chair now.

Right. So, there it is right there. I do appreciate you're having Idris Ela on today. So, the Zoran's not the best-looking guy on the show. You just cost yourself one vote, and that's why I'm going to win.

Well, if you're a New Yorker and you haven't voted yet, make sure to get out there tomorrow and vote for several candidates of your choices, Assemblyman Zoran Mamani and New York City controller Brad Lander. Everybody, we'll be right back.

Wow. What is the split between Republicans and Democrats in New York City?

Oof. I actually wonder if Cuomo would win if he if he ran as an independent because I imagine there are going to be votes that he can sweep up from the Democratic side, and I know Republicans and [ __ ] Muslim New York City mayor that's like a [ __ ] hellscape nightmare to them. I wonder if Republicans would vote for Cuomo. I have no idea though. I don't know what the electoral landscape looks like though. To support your point, here's a time stamp from the mayor debate. Adams is already running as an independent though. He actually is 100%. Homes or the subway platform because ultimately we need to focus on delivering on their concerns. Yes or no? Do you believe in a Jewish state of Israel? What the [ __ ] I believe Israel has a right to exist as a Jewish state. As a state with equal rights to exist. Oh yeah, we might have already watched this. It is funny how much they obsess over the Israel [ __ ] in um in the New York City mayor debate, but this is how they voted. I think the craziest question was like how quickly until you visit Israel once you're elected New York City mayor. And it's like why the [ __ ] is the mayor going to New H to to Israel? What the [ __ ] though? Adam won the election of 66.9%. Oh yeah. Okay. Damn. That could be a Oh, plus Adams too though, right? Has Adams Adams is running? Of course. Oh, never mind. No way. There's no way that Cuomo would win because him and Adams are going to be splitting against each other, right? One of them would have to make the decision to not run. Adams would either have to withdraw or Cuomo would have to endorse Adams. I don't know. I don't even know if that's like in the cards for either of these people. He wouldn't even run. This is embarrassing enough for him. Oh, I thought people were saying he already declared that he was running as an independent son. Unhinged Vos response to a well-informed anti-Zoron DGG-like voter.

What? You read that Adams was 100% running at Cuomo.

Oh, sorry. Oh, my bad. Yeah. Uh, Victoria. Victoria, nice to meet you. And are you from Queens?

Yes, I am.

How long have you lived here?

Uh, my entire life.

Okay, great. Um, in Jackson Heights?

Uh, in Elmhurst, then Forest Hills and Jackson Heights. So, this area, Western Queens. So, what are your thoughts on the election so far?

Uh, I don't like the way it has shaken out at all. Um, no. I'm worried. Oh, no. Basically, um, I supported Zora Meyer, who was my first choice from the beginning, who I think was absolutely wonderful. And uh, unfortunately, because of the way things are falling, I've had a vote for someone I really, really don't like, but who may save us from someone I really think is wrong for the city.

Okay, we all we all know what she's saying here, right? No supporter of Mandani talks this way. Is this is also a thing I've noticed with I guess you could say like liberals or conservatives or whatever, but anyone who isn't leftists. Nobody on the left ever sounds ashamed of their vote ever. Nobody has ever talked this way voting for Bernie, AOC, Mandani, anything like that, you know.

Yeah. They know they should be ashamed. Comfortable. Yeah. But it's they all they also always vote for people who are losing, but like they're of course they're not ashamed of their vote because they're they're voting literally on social credit and vibes and whatever makes them feel the happiest rather than actually winning elections is what?

Okay. Well, elaborating on that. Yes. My second choice vote was for Andrew Cuomo who I loathe, but I think Zory Mandani is a complete insult to our intelligence and dangerous and horrible.

Okay. In what ways do you think that he's dangerous or what parts do you disagree with?

Ideas are while they sound attractive and I think he is a wonderful wonderful speaker. I honestly do. Um, a lot of them are things that would have to go through the state legislature. A lot of them are things that I didn't want to profile immediately, but she does have evil eyes. So, I feel like that was my thought immediately, but then I thought, come on, chronology isn't real, but it is. Um, she does have evil eyes. So, you could have gone off that like from the beginning. Just don't make any economic sense. $30 minimum wage sounds great, but there are a lot of small businesses you can't go up that quickly that steeply. Freezing rent. I am a renter, but you know, I concede that there are things that the rent guidelines board has to take into consideration. So, I just don't think they're thought through. And I I I kind of I've gotten to think it's like a left-wing version of Trump. It's just break. This is making me think that she's um she's just a bigot because why it's so boring and tired. The Hassan [ __ ] the Taylor Loren [ __ ] I guess Vaj does it too. Still disappointing where like everybody that disagrees with me is a racist, is bigoted, is on the Trump side. I guess it's they're a communist or they have TDS or it's like a race to label your opponent as something and to never ever ever like it's actually crazy too because my guess is going to be this woman is way more politically plugged in uh than an ordinary citizen. I don't know how they're finding this, but like she's giving surprisingly nuanced answers for a person on the street, right? Like, oh, I'm a renter. I don't know about rent control. Some stuff would have to go through the state legislature. The rent control boards have their rationals where they do 30. She's actually giving decently politically informed answers. Way more than I would expect from from a random [ __ ] citizen. But just don't think they're thought through. And I I I kind of I've gotten to I'm sorry. Does she have the Jew archetype? Is this a Jewish person? I can't tell. I'm suck. My Judar is broken. It's like a left-wing version of Trump. It's just break. This is making me think that she's um she's just a bigot because I feel like if her problems were with Mani's policies, she would have spoken more severely about the rent freeze. If she literally brought up two policies and issues relating to them. what she literally brought up the $30 an hour thing and I think that's where she mentioned the state legislature thing would have to be brought in from and then she literally brought up the rent control thing and said that the um rent control boards and she said even as a renter what are you talking about if it's not that then why the [ __ ] are you talking about him so severely that makes me think like there's something else when you say he's not a good fit for New York do you think he'd be a good fit for your neighborhood how many how many things does she have to bring up in 10 seconds in order to not be a bigot what the [ __ ] things for the s for you know just for the sake of breaking things and I really I really find that scary.

So you're kind of mentioning that you feel like you're in a tough situation. You're actually the first voter I've spoken to who had a first choice who was um my uh yeah which is kind of wonderful. I think his housing plan is just you really creative and really what we need. I mean he wants to go in with 100,000 units of housing. I mean I think it's it's just wonderful and you know I think he's been lost in the shuffle. He is young. Uh but you know I think he would have been a great mayor.

You think she lied about the renter thing? Oh, when she was like, "I'm a renter." She in her head, she's like, "Well, I rent stuff out. I rent, you know." I mean, obviously, he's not going to going to go anywhere. But what are your top issues as a New Yorker?

Um, cost of living, healthcare, housing.

Yeah. This this makes me wonder if it's just a raw bigotry thing because again, the the vitriol with which she answered when otherwise it seems like vitriol when she's like, I really don't like this other. Okay. I mean, I guess maybe. Yeah. I don't know. I would say so. In terms of housing, would you like to see like more housing being built? Um, what are some changes that you would like to see?

Uh, I would like I I don't like the city of Yas. I don't think it's sensitive to neighborhoods like this one where historic preservation The city of Yas. Is that what she said? Is that a reference? Uh, I would like I I don't like the city of Yas. I don't think I don't know what that means. It's sensitive to neighborhoods like this one where historic preservation is so important and so much a part of the fabric of the neighborhood. Maybe. Um, I would like I think it was Brad Brad Lander's idea to go to like uh city-owned lots or maybe it was Scott Stringer, I can't remember, but a lot of like vacant city-owned land and she pays a lot of attention too. She knows multiple candidates and multiple positions from those candidates. I like Yeah. And I But I like how you just said that she wasn't giving policy positions. It was just a bigot.

Can you explain pros and cons to rent freeze policies?

Um, rent freeze is um rent freeze is considered bad because it causes people to consume inappropriate levels of housing rather than to sort themselves out in a more financially reasonable way. Um, it encourages overconsumption. If you are in a certain property and you have a rent-frozen property, you're highly incentivized to stay there and not move when moving might be better for a variety of reasons. Otherwise, um, it disincentivizes renovation or units sometimes being created in the city if people know that um or or purchases of of units or whatever. People won't buy stuff or invest in stuff if they know there's not going to be able to um recover any rents on it. Um, and it makes it harder for people outside the city to ever afford or be able to move into the city because the number of unrenrolled units are often times much more strictly controlled or there's a smaller supply I should say. So, the prices on those tend to be even higher because there's more people competing over lesser stuff. Um, the pros on rent the rent control side is that if you have a rent control unit then you are then you obviously there's a huge surplus of value there for you because you are um able to own and consume something uh at a much higher that has a much higher value than what you're paying for it basically and start building there. Um, the idea about building market rates and housing market-rate housing in the um extra areas around housing projects I think is pretty good. Um, so I mean we do need more housing, but I think it has to be done sensitively. I really do. And I really like the plan and this I know is Landers um borrowed from other places where you on on the homeless mentally ill, you get them homes first. You are you are an interesting one. You're an interesting one.

All right. Okay. I like how leftists like literally cannot compute that maybe somebody does want the same end as you, they just don't think your policies are good. Like remember what I said before, leftists, a lot of people do this where they plug in the outcome to their policy and if you're opposed to the policy it must mean you're opposed to the outcome. Like they can't it's like they can't compute it at all. It's it's incomprehensible to them.

The city of Yasu was a legislative proposal in city council to make it so that more commercial lots can be rezoned for residents and vice versa and increased regular capacity for housing/legalized some basement tenants etc. Okay. I I appreciate a little a little mixup. I'm running out of things to check on the list that aren't it's a race thing. Um, you know, I it's it's it's it's very strange. And get them off the street and I think that's great. I really do. Um, and yes, I am I am also concerned about crime. Obvious though, that's would be another one. And and the mentally ill go into that. Um, so would you be ranking Blander also in your Yeah, she mentions crime, but she also said she supports housing-first homelessness policy, which is like that's not a conservative policy at all. That's what What part of her is conservative? Is Isn't everybody what she's talking about part of the Democratic primary? Housing-first homelessness policy, which is like that's not a conservative policy at all. That that's not that's the opposite. Well, originally I was going to originally I was

Going to have Cuomo fifth, and I was going to have Senator in there. I was going to have Jessica Ramos in there. She's a state senator from here. I was going to have Michael Blake there because I worked with him on the Obama campaign, and I think he's great. Worked with Oh [ __ ] Now we know. Now we know why she's so knowledgeable. She's an insider.

Okay, this isn't median voter [ __ ] at all. She No, this might not be Islamophobia. No [ __ ] This isn't a median voter. This woman is like, like I said before, like I would be shocked for somebody to give me like two coherent policies and then like the arguments for and against them for any candidate. This is a obviously above average informed voter. It would it would make sense if she had a job in politics or she just followed it closely as a hobby. Knowledgeable. She's an insider. Okay, this isn't median votership at all. She No, this might not be Islamophobia. This might be an intellectually informed opposition to democratic socialism.

Okay, wait. We're we're we're revealing more layers here. Well, I mean, everything she said so far seemed, whether you agree or disagree, at least she seems to know what she's talking about. But this this might actually be like this is like this is guys, this is like an actual op. This isn't like an unthinking stoge of another of another ideology. This person might actually be like an ideological opponent. That's crazy.

Uh, and then I was going to have fifth, but because of the way because of everything that's happening, I knew they didn't have a shot. So I want I had to push Pomo up. Are you surprised kind of by the momentum that Zoron Mandani has picked up? What's the leading solution right here for low-income workers and need to work in the area? Do lower income people just have to accept a commute? How does the Brito maintenance worker live close to the big business in the area? Um, I don't know. Um, I'm not sure how I don't know. How does Tokyo do it? Maybe you just say [ __ ] it to all of the price controls and then ideally those businesses are forced to pay those workers a little bit more if you work in those places so you can live closer. I'm not sure.

Um, are you because it seems like you know he's really kind of hit the pavement and garnered a lot of Yeah. Okay. I'm very invested in this. I'm very very very invested in this report. I don't know like how accurate you know the I feel I feel like it's like a street interviewer who's going around New York City asking people how they feel about the fact that we bomb Iran and some guy's like, well, I don't think it's good that Trump did it, but like there's some legitimacy to that. And you talk to him for a few minutes more and he's like, well, back when I worked uh in the State Department under Biden, and you're like, hold on [ __ ] wait, I'm I'm set. Please give me all of your state secrets. I would like to inform my ideology and can reflect that.

Um, do you think like maybe a few weeks ago your rank choice voting would have been uh different? Maybe if you're not trying to Well, I might have had fifth. Yeah, definitely. I [ __ ] love this channel, by the way. I got to say I I feel I don't want to convince you, but it's also literally the day of the election. So, no PC I've interacted with in the real world, not looking for attention on the internet, would say, "This woman is racist. Vosch talks like Kevin Spacy from the House of Cards when he's near a black person. He's an idiot." Jesus. Like, uh, I think the DSA and a lot of people criticize them. They are amazing in terms of getting out there. [ __ ] What the [ __ ] Oh my god. It's just curveball after curveball with this woman. I mean, they are amazing in terms of getting out there. Uh, I think the DSA and a lot of people criticize them. They are amazing in terms of getting out there. [ __ ] What the [ __ ] Oh my god. It's just curveball after curveball with this woman. When she says getting out there, I wonder if she means like they're really good at maybe in New York City at like organizing and getting their message out. Is Vos only capable of like seeing people as stereotypes or is she watching the stream right now? Is she like a deep agent? It has to be Israel. But if it was Israel, why wouldn't she have said something by now? It's not It's New York. It's not like saying Israel is why you voted is that taboo here. They really support their candidates. They go door to door; they are on the streets all the time, and I think they really work for it. Just think um I mean anyway, as I was saying, we are primed for anti-semitism um or like anti-semitic like violence to become widespread uh a little on the extreme right uh but in a lot of these like further lefting spaces rip good luck I love AOC but uh I think is a real estate by them I really do what kind of canvasing have you seen um in your neighborhood I'm curious like what kind of advertisements do you feel like have been kinding basically yeah I'm from all different candidates or do you really think Vosch is anti-semitic?

Um, do I think Vosch is anti-semitic? No, but the problem is like the leftist position has become indistinguishable from anti-semitism. Like it it's you can't really distinguish it. You just can't actually. There's you just can't. I don't know what to say. Anyway, sorry. Mostly Mandani, the far left. The the far left like these socialists and commies and the basically anybody obsessed with the Israel Palestine thing. Yeah. Really really been out there. And um you know I I've also gotten direct mail from just about everybody. Um but you know my knowledge is from reading the papers watching the debates and getting a sense of them that way. But again I have to hand it to the DSA because they really really get out there. Yeah. This is the Oh yeah, there you go. Yeah, that's what she was saying is that they're good at getting their message out. Anti-median voter. This is incredible. The median voter has strong uninformed opinions that are incoherent. This woman is clearly smart, has coherent opinions, but we have no idea how they all line up to form a greater ideology. It's it's it's like inconsistency but in another way. This it's very fascinating. It's very interesting. She knows it too. The interviewers the interviewer is like I'll be here all day. I don't give a [ __ ] I I'll do the whole video on this one lady. I don't give a [ __ ] Like V has talked to you a lot. Does he not have a theory of mind for you? It's hard to say. I don't know. It maybe the answer is as simple as like audience capture. Like you just have an audience that want to hear a thing and you just get used to doing that all the time. I'm not sure. So and and I think that and and he is the best speaker of the group. But that's cosmetic. It's not substance. So I I think it would be a very dark day for the city if you won. Is there anything you want to add? Excuse me. Is there anything else you want to add? Uh yes. Mark Lavine is is the only choice for controller in Johnny Williams Republican. You're following the controller is I know I need to know more. I need to know more about this woman. Okay. Love you. Nice to talk to you. Thank you so much. I really appreciate it. Thank you. So what do you think about to any New York City bosites? Okay. If you see this woman, steer the [ __ ] clear. Okay. She's clearly she's got connection. She's capable of [ __ ] you couldn't even imagine. Okay. The mayor's race. Okay. This is the income breakdown for how people voted. I don't know what I'm supposed to just median incomes. This doesn't show any vote stuff. or dude, I'm from Tyrron. I've just got internet back after two week shutdown and catching up on your conflict clips. You're spot on as always. Kudos to you, Destiny. Thanks. I think best photo data map. Okay, the whites came out. The whites and the riches came out. Damn.

Hi. What's up, buddy? Hey, man. Uh, real quick, just wanted to, as always, let everybody know there's a new edition of the Pragmatic Papers out. It's a real good one. Um, there's a little bit shorter than normal, but the articles in them are really great. I know you don't like breaking news. I mentioned it last time, but the Israel Iran thing is has been has been going on and it's been getting a little bit more intense. Um, Deosines Rex does a really good job of going over at length kind of the background that led up to this and kind of the attitude behind all the parties involved. So, you guys should really check that one out. There's a great breakdown by Menu False of the assassination of the Minnesota politicians. And then another really good one was by Reason Rifts about the um new Syrian uh regime that's been taking over and kind of an analysis of who they are, what kind of government they're setting up, and kind of what to expect from them. So, uh, it'd be really great if everybody go check them out and uh you know, support. We also wanted to say thanks to everybody that uh donated to us. Um, it even the little bit that y'all did really helps. We're trying to set up a new website and and do some other really cool stuff. Uh, so we we really appreciate all the support from the community. Um, also big shout out to Jim Zar for my uh super cool profile pick that y'all can see that there. That's me. Nice. Cute. Yeah.

Um, okay. Now that my contractual obligations out of the way, did you see you didn't you didn't see that ninth circuit reversing the TTRO in California regarding the National Guard deployment? Um, I think I read a thing on it, but like like I saw I had land on it, but I don't want any of the details about it. Okay. We don't need to get get into the the super fine details on it. But they essentially kind of did the same thing as um the Supreme Court with the American Enemies Act where they say, "Oh, the the president declared there was a insurrection. We can't review that and so therefore the TTRO is going to get um overturned." Okay. And I and I and I want your opinion on how you feel about the president having these kind of statements that they can make that are just entirely beyond judicial view. Do you think that that's something that should exist in our government or like should exist in a good um structure of a government that we have somewhere the president can just kind of say something exists and it's just beyond judicial when you present it that way. No. But I think with the way that it works here, I would say probably yes. U because it sounds like this was expressly granted to him from an act of Congress and they even I think gave their own limitations to it. But I think the Congress has chosen not to enact their own restrictions on the president's um declarations of emergencies and everything here. So I mean like obviously I don't like Trump's declarations here, but it seems like this was literally a law from Congress. Congress even granted themselves some authority to review the presidential declarations and they've decided to forego that. So, I don't know if it would be appropriate for a judge to step in here to try to do that. So, I think it's easy for me to agree with you on the whenever we're talking about like in the moment, we're talking about he declares it, he's deploying, he's taking care of it, right? If there was a true invasion or insurrection, I think it's hard for to make a case that a judge should be able to step in and make some kind of decision. But let's say we are three months past whenever this conflict is this this apparent emergency's over. Mhm. And California shows up and says, "Hey, that was not an insurrection. Here's problems that happened because of his actions, and we have a cause of action now against the the president for doing those wrong things." Who's the who's to say what an insurrection is or not? Well, I think in the moment it it makes sense that we can't because remember the the courts are saying we can't look at the factual allegations behind this in the claim of the insurrection. So if he says there's an insurrection because there's a million people rising up in LA and we've got to go stop him. Yeah. And then 3 months later we say, "Well, wait, there's only a thousand people." Right. And that should not have constituted the response, right? I think at that point whenever the dust is settled, we can come in and we're not talking about in getting in the way of the president's enactment of power, but saying maybe there's liability afterwards for an improper enactment of power. Do you think that there's space for something like that? Um, intuitively, no. It doesn't sound like it. No, because the idea is you wouldn't want the president being worried that a court is going to second guess his um insurrection declaration, right? Well, sure. To me, I see the balance of am I more worried about a president second guessing himself about an insurrection declaration or am I more worried about a president abusing an unimpeachable declaration of insurrection? Like what what are those two things? Which one? So, this is the big this is the big issue that we have right now that I think people need to be very careful about is um like I say that Trump is like a dictator and all this [ __ ] and I say that over and over again, but the issue that we have right now is that Trump did not seize power in a way that was unpopular. Trump has the support of apparently half of American voters right now, and that's where a lot of our issues are coming from. So if you ask me just looking at the American system, am I worried about the president just arbitrarily declaring insurrections and abusing that power? The easy and instantaneous answer is no. I would never be worried about that because we have a very easy mechanism to instantly hold a president accountable for that which is impeachment at the very least if not Congress um using whatever was built into that act to say, "Well, we reviewed this and actually we don't agree there's an insurrection." Because I think they have that on the Alien Enemies Act. Um and I think they have that on the on the other one that he was using for terrorists. I think they have these built in. But the issue is, well, what do you do if half of America supports it and therefore over half of the Congress supports it and then the president does it? Well, I mean, at this point, are we looking for the judiciary to stop it? Probably not. I don't think so. I think Trump has the popular support for this. Congress is our mechanism to stop it, and Congress isn't doing it. They're failing their job or or maybe they're succeeding their job, I guess, depends on how you view it. And so, I think it is as it is. It sucks, but that's Yeah, that's fair. I just in my mind whenever I'm I'm thinking about it kind of in a bit of a macro sense I it feels a little bit like the Congress is creating a power handing it to the president and then saying well the judiciary can't get involved and then whenever we come to this kind of place where we're saying okay well now we need someone to check this the Congress says oh well we're hands off or we haven't put the right measures in there. It's not so much that we're asking somebody to check it. It's that we're asking to get a procedural thing from the judiciary that probably should have been further clarified by the Congress because we're not asking for a check on can he actually do this. We're asking for like a definitional procedural check on was this actually an insurrection. And it sounds like that's something that maybe Congress should have had a stricter definition for that in in the actual piece of legislation or something. But absent that, I mean, it's not I don't think it's up to the judiciary to to check that. I mean, if Trump has the power granted to him from the Congress and they pass that law and they're not doing anything about it, then even even in a a post a a a retrospective case assessing damages from a potential misuse of power, you don't you think even that is too far of a restraint from the because in that case, right, I'm not saying that doesn't remove any of Trump's powers. It would just make it so that a person would be owed um restitution by the government for a misuse of power, right? It this happens in civil rights cases and things like that. And we have cases in which the government abuses power. People then have a cause of action to come in and sue for damages and get paid because the government misabused the powers they were grant. I think those are generally very exceptional cases though, right? It's pretty rare that the government can be held civily liable as long as it's exercising its power. Like those are generally you're talking about where people are stepping outside of like their civil immunity or stepping outside of something and doing something either illegal or or I think generally illegal. So against the law, not necessarily the government just doing a thing. Yeah, sure. But I mean I think I think that in whenever I look at the second amendment of of the United States Constitution, at least spiritually nowadays, the purpose of it is as a literal check on an abuse of power. It feels like we we as a nation have at least in the past, I don't know anymore, a concept of there's an abuse of power by the government and there needs to be a severe check to it. There needs to be something there. And I feel like I agree with you. I I do actually really agree with you that the Congress impeaching the president is is a true check and and does address this. Um however, um the la the the fact that we have these three branches and it feels like the judiciary is being really cut out of a lot of this is a little unsettling me in the sense of in a perfect world where we a post perfect post Trump world in which we're reforming to make sure this never happens again. To me, I see that that is an area where something could be at least done or changed. So, I just I mean, you could rewrite these laws or amend these laws in ways that add some more qualifiers. But the reality is there's probably not much you can do if half the country is willing to support a guy who's actually a dictator and then half the Congress is willing to support a guy who's actually a dictator, which is where we're at right now. I mean, there's what are you going to do, right? I'm I'm Yeah, I'm very I have no argument against the he's just got a at least facially populist mandate to just kind of do whatever he wants.

Um, okay. Then to I feel like we talk too much about politics and and and doomer stuff. I I believe you style yourself as a pretty good debater, right? I try to be. Okay. Um, are and and you can are you confident in your ability to argue positions that you don't personally hold? Yeah, of course. I mean, if it's a if it's related to a topic where I have a position that I do passionately hold, but not for like random stuff that I don't know anything about. Right. Sure. Sure. Sure. Okay. Um, can you help me? I'm trying to work out I'm trying to kind of build out a uh a debate or an argument against veganism. Do you mind being a prove vegan debate partner with me? Sure, we can do it for a couple minutes. Go for it. Yeah, this isn't going to take long. This isn't going to take long. Okay. So what I've seen in the past, so so my argument stems from the idea that there really isn't any moral reason to not eat people, right? Because I feel like what I see a lot of vegans do is they say it's immoral to eat people, but we think it's moral, or at least it's a morally neutral thing to eat animals, and that's wrong. We should consider it immoral to eat animals. Is that a misstatement of That's starting to get there. I mean, I think most vegans would just say that like they would just say that that argument is fine, but then they would say that you're insane because the vast majority of people would never be okay in a world where you can eat other people, right? Well, but we we No,

No, no. We already live in that world. We live in a world where it's okay to eat people. It just has to be the right circumstance, right? You have to be in a situation in which the necessity exists such that it would overcome your empathy for another person. And this is true for other animals, too. We don't eat dogs generally because Wait, wait, wait, wait. What are the circumstances where it's okay to eat people?

If you and I were in a lifeboat, okay, and we had no food and it was probably 30 days to shore and we would probably die if we didn't eat anything and there was a fresh corpse in the boat. I feel like I wouldn't eat that corpse. Sure. So that might be the case, but I feel like I don't feel like this is an actual test of any moral principles because I think if you wanted to, you could like the qualifiers that you're adding there, like you're going to die otherwise, you could basically make anything morally permissible, right? Like, should we be allowed to kill inconvenient 8-year-olds? I would say, well, no. And I was like, "Okay, well, what if you were in a survival situation where there was only three of you, two adults and an 8-year-old, and you only had enough like food to survive for 30 days if you killed one of you?" Like, in that and you need both people to row the boat or whatever, can you kill the 8-year-old? Okay, I guess in this, but like we wouldn't take that moral rule and then say, "Well, I guess it must be okay to kill 8-year-olds in certain circumstances then because the amount of qualifiers you added are so special. You would never generalize that rule to all of society, right?"

Well, one second, but we Okay. In America, we generally don't eat dogs, right? Sure. Is there any moral reason why we don't eat dogs? We like dogs and they're cute. I don't think that's a moral reason. I think that's like an empathetic reason. Most vegans would agree with that, though. Vegans would actually start their arguments there. Have you ever seen videos of cows? Why would you not eat a dog, but you would eat a cow? Cows are just as cute, right? They would start from there.

Yeah. Well, they might say that, but my argument is that it's easier for us to empathize with dogs and cats. They there's even studies on it showing that they share similarities to human children such that it allows us to empathize with them greater than say, uh, other animals. And yeah, but I mean you can also we empathize with people who are more similar to us than not and that's why slavery was possible. That's not a moral argument for slavery. It's not a moral argument for slavery. But the reason that slavery is wrong though I can talk about things like, uh, people should have the right to freedom, people should have the right to liberty and things like that. A corpse doesn't have any of those rights and I'm not violating a human corpse's rights by eating it.

Sure. And I'm not, by the way, I'm not saying we should kill people and eat them. I'm saying just eating a human body. That's all. Not killing and eating a person. Sure. I don't think vegans would be opposed principally to eating an animal corpse. Right. Sure. But so then so Okay. So then it's then the issue is is like why is it okay for so is it more just that the vegans would be arguing it's wrong that we are raising, killing, and then eating the animals? Eating the animals is just a result of the bad action of raising and killing an animal for eating. Yeah. Part of the ecosystem, right? Okay. Okay. So then I've seen also a kind of a name the trait argument kind of thing that they do and they seem to do they rely on consciousness or is that just where it always ends up or they usually use a different thing? Name the trait is going to be the one because a lot of people try to draw a meaningful distinction between animal sentience and human sentience. And the problem is it's hard to create an all-encompassing category that would include every human because people intuitively feel like the category of human is something that should be protected that would exclude every animal because people seem to feel like animals are a category that can be excluded. So name the trait will run down what's every trait necessary to guarantee human privilege that doesn't also apply to some category of animal that we eat. Right? So like and this is just lawyer brain here. Um, for me if I was asked that question it's just that humans can have intent and animals can't. And and I mean that in a legal definition. Um, in the sense that animals can are are considered to not be able to possess intent to actually do things. They have instinct. Although I'd be careful. The counter here and you know this as well, right? Is the reason why children for instance aren't sentenced to capital offenses because they're said not to possess the mental faculty to even have the mens rea to commit, um, like acts that are so horrible that they would be sentenced to death for it. Like a 12-year-old is said in all states to not be able to possess enough state of mind to have the intent to commit first-degree murder. And that's why they're not charged with those crimes, right? And I think we would roughly agree with that. Like an 8-year-old can't first-degree murder someone because an 8-year-old, no offense to 8-year-olds, they don't even really know what like death and life means. They're [ __ ] of their kids, right? But we wouldn't say it's okay to eat children.

Yeah. But our our our um our attitudes towards intent and people being able to possess intent doesn't isn't a binary of we eat them or don't eat them, right? And also I would say that act I mean I would make the argument of actually those I would say that the children argument doesn't make sense. Children can possess intent. It's just whether or not we ascribe to them um the ability to have the intent such that we could charge them criminally. We still have intent more than what any animal has possibly. I mean when you're at a lower age like I would say like below the age of like one we I don't think we ascribe much intent to like toddlers or whatever you call the age before toddlers like infants or whatever. We don't ascribe much intent to them. Like if they throw something at somebody or they hit you in the face, you're just like, "Oh, the kid's being stupid. It's just a kid or it's a baby." See, in that sense, then I would just kind of default back to kind of the the empathy thing where it's just like since we're able to empathize such with a child. Um, and the necessity to eat is not there such that we would need to eat the child, then that's why we don't eat them. It doesn't have anything to do then at that point, it's really not the intent.

Yeah. But after the necessity argument, all vegans would say it's not a necessity to eat animals. We could live off of plants. No, no, but it's a It's like a it's like a supply and demand graph, right? As your empathy goes down, your necessity also goes down for the the the the amount of necessity to eat goes down for you to eat that animal, right? I don't empathize very much with cows. So, I don't need that high of a necessity to eat a cow. I That's a system that you could generate, but they're going to they would probably start throwing hypotheticals at you and you could bite the bullet on them, but you're it's going to be very morally unintuitive things. Like if you had a group of people who were all starving, um, like and somebody there had a dog and somebody else had a child, uh, and there were other people like you're going to have to get very very very close to the would be willing to eat a child as in order to eat the dog. Like most people are going to view their animals as as children. Some people even view animals as as better than children because animals in a silly way we don't view them as having agency. So we don't view them as moral agency. We never view them as being bad. Like people have a default position for animals as infants where all of them are by default unable to be bad so they're innocent. So a lot of people would have to be pushed basically up to the point to where they'd eat a human to eat their animal.

I think Sure. And I think yeah I think that like that makes sense but also I would say that that doesn't necessarily it's not really a defeater for me in the sense of like well it's a defeater for mass animal agriculture because they would say that we're nowhere near like a vegan might even just concede to A vegan would just say, "Yeah, I guess if people only ate animals and they were pushed up to that like survival threshold, then that would be that would be a much better world than the one we live in now." Sure. Well, I mean, what I'm Yeah, I guess necessity is actually a bad word to use there. It's not It's not nec I'm not really saying it's like a survival necessity threshold. It's just a like the amount of empathy that I have for this thing means I don't give a [ __ ] up to a certain point. Sure. And then I can eat and I'm fine. But yeah. Okay. I see what you're saying. Thanks. I was just I was just kind of thinking along those lines cuz I've been uh watching a little bit of your backlog and you keep running into vegans for some reason in my YouTube feed and I was like man uh this is weird. So yeah, I mean there's ask yourself used to have I think they still have the Discord server if you ever want to debate vegans. There's like a million vegans in there that are always ready to throw down. So Oh, okay. Well, I'll check them out. That sounds good. All right. Well, I appreciate you chatting with me everybody in chat. Love you all. Uh and you have a great day again. Thanks, Gemar, for the the awesome profile pick. You rock. Wait, is it Gemar or Gamsar? Is it Gamsar? He didn't talk to me like voice chat. He just texted and then he just threw this amazing artwork at me. So, um, Mr. Gamsar, thank you so much. All right, have fun. Be careful. Love you. Bye. Fox News signed Brett Cooper. Interesting. Good luck, Brett. I did not do [ __ ] I took a step. I had to pull up my pants. Just about to cut my pizza over here. About to get a knife. No scissors around. And monitor just falls off. I didn't do nothing, bro. Oh my god. I did not do nothing, bro. What'd I do, bro? I'm afraid to step, bro. I didn't do nothing. I'm out of Why is this even posted? shot. Okay, this will always be my favorite [ __ ] Vosch clip. My god. For me to actually politically represent my interest. I'm not My point here ain't about criticizing your vote. It's that only two people were going to be president and there were only two real paths to FBI. No, but those are those are two different Butch, I want to be really clear here. You said there were two for me to actually politically represent my interest. I'm not my point here ain't about criticizing your vote. It's that only two people were going to be president and there were only two. Zoran is not Muslim. He is a 12 Shia like the Iranian regime. Isn't a 12ia is not a Muslim? Is not a sect of Islam. Please, Zoran, don't be the new AOC. We're going to have to accept that he's going to do things we won't like. He's in a position that requires compromise sometimes. If he doesn't defund the NYPD and call for all landlords to be beheaded in the next week. Jesus. I think he's kind of joking here, but This is a biblical moment. You know, when Jesus was on the cross, he said, "God, forgive them for they know not what they do." All these negroes who were asking me to step down, God forgive them. So this is a biblical moment. You know when Jesus was on the cross, he said, "God, forgive them for they know not what they do." Okay. Shia are considered not Muslim by Sunnis. Sunnis are the majority of Muslims anyways. Okay. And some [ __ ] Christian cringers say Catholics aren't Christian. I'm pretty sure Shia are Muslim. What do you mean? Most Shia are not Muslim. They don't believe in the hadiths and none of them. I thought it was like different I think there are some hadiths that everybody basically believes in and there are some that um different sects of Islam believe in. Shia doesn't believe in in any hadiths at all. The Shia school is very rich in terms of reliable hadith collections thanks to the a hadith of the holy prophets and his pure progeny Muhammad peace be upon him. The infallible Imams peace be upon them are the closest people to the holy prophet in terms of position and time. They are inherent and infallible and they are profuse. There are profuse narrations quoted from them in Shia's hadith books. Some of Shia's major hadith collections that are considered to be reliable are the following. Al kafi authored by Islam. Muhammad bin Yakub Koulani Kulani Al Tazib authored by Shiktusi. May Allah bless him. Okay. [ __ ] you. Hadiths aren't part of the Quran, the only holy book. That is the belief in Shia. I believe Sunnis don't think that um hadiths are part of um the Quran either though. Okay, stop. Don't. If you're not, stop being cringe. Wait. [ __ ] I started to save my reels. Sometimes there's good ass reels out there. Never mind. We're not going to watch this. I can even do this. Okay. Quick Vosch clip. [ __ ] it. Says, "Put your hands on the wheel." Simon says, "Reach into your back pocket to retrieve your wallet so you can show me your ID." Quick, now bring me that ID. I didn't say Simon says. Simon says put your hands on the wheel. Thanks. Go ahead. Right in the back. Yeah, you tall one. The tall man. Mr. President, Johannes Petra from Austrian National Television. You once said that you would end the Ukraine war in 24 hours. You later said you said that sarcastically. Of course it was sarcastic. But you've now been in office for five. Of course I was sarcastic. months and five days. Why have you not been able to end the Ukraine war? Because it's more difficult than uh people would have any idea. Uh Vladimir Putin has been more difficult. Frankly, I had some problems with Zillinsky. You may have read about him and it's been more difficult than other wars. I mean, look, we just ended a war in 12 days that was simmering for 30 years, frankly. Uh we ended uh Rwanda and Didn't he already say this? Um, was it a truth or was it a quote from him a few months ago? Didn't he say Ukraine and Russia is more difficult than anyone could have imagined or something? Rwanda and the Congo, it's they're coming to sign the documents. We've already signed basic documents, but they're coming, I think, to the White House on Friday. Uh, we ended uh Serbia was going to go at it, but maybe the most important of all, India and Pakistan. And that wasn't whether or not they may someday have nukes like we're talking about in off topic. I'm going to research the Iranian genocide. Yeah, I was reading on my own. Maybe I'll do it on stream. That shit's crazy, dog. The Middle East like we're talking about with Israel and Iran. This is the half nuclear weapons. I ended that with a series of phone calls on trade. I Yeah. Did you? Six to base. I'm just on lunch break. Here you go, my friend. Fresh bread and falafel. Okay. I've been meaning to try this Arap food. I heard it's pretty good. The best in the West, my friend. How is the food, my friend? Alhamdulillah. My friend mango juice. Alhamdulillah. Now he can go from beating black people to beating women. Just kidding. Video games. Woman throw a speaker off a ship in Greece. Oh [ __ ] Wait, she didn't throw that. She [ __ ] launched that. Wait, what? Oh my god. And they have the Jew flag here. There it goes. That's a Blue Lives Matter flag. Oh [ __ ] my bad. 18-year-old teen jumped off a cruise ship because of a dare and was never seen again. This kid [ __ ] jumped off. Oh my [ __ ] god. Oh, byebye. Oh [ __ ] Hey buoy. Did he die? We don't know. He was never found again. Yo, this kid's [ __ ] gone, bro. There's a really scary video. Did we watch this on stream where like once you're like a like a like a like a hundred yards or something away from a ship, a person is like invisible? Like even in even in daylight, it's very hard to see people. And then at night, you're just like gone forever. You're just completely gone. though. Oh, this was good. The best Trump clip. One of the best Trump clips of all time. Concern out there. People are worried. Even some people who voted for you saying, "I didn't sign up for this." So, how do you answer those concerns? Well, they did sign up for it, actually. And this is what I campaigned on. I said that we've been abused by other countries at levels that nobody's ever seen before. Actually, you did sign up for it. Okay, two more of these. What is this? Um, wait. I assumed Theo had some sort of justification for choking this dude, but it seems like he's just maybe not a good person. Hey, I'm the fan who got choked out by Theo Van. Let me tell you what actually happened. Okay, so I'm not just a random fan. I live in Nashville. I play music full-time, okay? All of this happened on May 2nd. See right there? Yeah. Which also happened to be my birthday. Okay. I had my gig from 6:00 to 10:00. My friends brought me cake. They brought me balloons. The bar brought me sparklers. So, when Theo walked in, he didn't have any security with him, so people were walking up to him, talking to him, taking photos. I finished my show. This was like 10:18. Nobody in my party had talked to him yet, not even me. We thought it would be a funny video idea to get him and me popping my birthday balloons together cuz he's a comedian. I was trying to be courteous cuz he was talking to somebody at the moment. So, in this next video, you can actually hear me say, "I don't want to interrupt their conversation." I was waiting my turn to talk to him. Uh, everybody was all just standing around having fun, having a good time. Uh, nobody was bothering anybody. Uh, I mean, I'll show you the full video. That's the guy I was waiting for who I didn't want to interrupt. What's the guy? Wait, that's the guy Oh, I see. Okay. I was waiting for who I didn't want to interrupt. This is where the video that you've seen starts. I went up and I said, "Will you pop some balloons with me?" He turned away and looked like I said something offensive. I leaned in and said, "Hey man, I'm a fan. I'm just messing with you." He turned back around and then aggressively got in my face right there. I was confused. So, you can see me lean in and say, "What?" And that's when he grabbed my throat and shoved me back. What happened was he turned away. This is where the video that you've seen starts. I went up and I said, "Will you pop some balloons with me?" He turned away and looked like I [ __ ] Is there a video where the audio plays? This is where the video that you've seen starts. I went up and I said, "Will you pop some balloons with me?" He turned away and looked like I said something offensive. I leaned in and said, "Hey man, I'm a fan. I'm just messing with you." He turned back around and then aggressively got in my face right there. I was confused. So, you can see me lean in and say, "What?" And that's when he grabbed my throat and shoved me back. What happened? Grab my throat and shove me back is a little bit. I mean, he kind of does. [ __ ] I don't know how drunk any of the people involved are. I feel like I feel like the I feel like you need to know a lot about this interaction. I feel like Theo jumped off a little bit, but um this is where if he's leaning in and talking to him here and he's asking him something. This is where the video that like hey like can you do something or for me or can we like take a um can we take a picture? Can we do something you've seen starts? I went up and I said we if he says here like no sorry I'm busy or

Whatever or he says something, I don't know. With me, he turns, and then he turns away to leave. Said something offensive or talk Ian, and then he touches his shoulder and he's like, "Hey, come back." And then he, "I'm a fan, I'm just messing with you." Says something else here, I don't know, like that. Re-engagement is a big, he turned back around, and then and then they chat a little bit, but I don't know what's being said here. It's hard because I can't hear anything, but the guy, even after he says any something, he leans back, the guy still kind, I was confused. So you can see, and then he says something, but we can't hear anything being said here. And then he pushes him back.

Grab my throat and shove me back. What happened, but it's really hard without hearing anything here. I feel like Dio is probably not in the right, maybe almost no matter what. Um, but it ranges from being like understandable to really bad. It's just hard to, without hearing any of the audio here, it's hard to say. The video that you've seen starts. I went up and I said, "Will you pop some balloons with me?" He turned away and looked like I said something offensive. I leaned in and said, "Hey, man. I'm a fan. I'm just messing with you." He turned back around and then aggressively got in my face right there. I was confused. So, you can see me lean in and say, "What?" And that's when he grabbed my throat and shoved me back.

What happened was a completely uncalled for reaction. Especially when you consider the facts that nobody in my party had been badgering him for hours. We hadn't even talked to him. This was a 14-second interaction, and that was it. As an entertainer in downtown Nashville, I get being overwhelmed by crowds and people coming up to you all the time. At the end of my shift, at least I get to unplug and go home. And you know, I feel for Theo, where he probably can't get away from that a lot more easily than I can. I'm post-surgery. I was one week back from recovery. This could have ended my career, but luckily there was no damage to my vocal cords or neck. I'm not trying to get any sympathy or anything out of this. I just want people to know that, you know, the celebrities that you see on camera can be completely different people in real life. You know, thank you for listening to the truth.

Different video. Give us an example of what a fan would need to say to react like that. Uh, no. This is a either no, you don't. Um, if somebody is not interested in talking to you and they turn away, and then you put your hand on their shoulder to bring them back to talk to you again, um, I, in my opinion, at that point you're like in ass-whooping territory, or you should be like prepared for that. Um, it's just a big, it's just a big like personal space thing. And especially if the guy has already like rejected like talking to you, that's you should understand that that's what you're signing up for. If you're too autistic to understand that, then you just shouldn't talk to people like this or get a to do it. But that's, I think that's going to be on the table for anybody that's especially like more physical. Like if it's a larger dude or whatever, it's probably going to,

Have you had any interactions like this with me doing the touching? No, cuz I'm not autistic as [ __ ]. But Nathan dropped his [ __ ] phone. What are we doing? Drop the [ __ ] balloon. What is she saying? Drop the [ __ ] balloons. Drop the [ __ ] balloons. Drop the [ __ ] motor. I can't tell what she's saying. Is it drop the [ __ ] balloons? You doing? Drop the [ __ ] phone. She's saying she should get a shot of his face. It just seems like a lot for um, like he like Theo is clearly saying no here or he's not interested or whatever and then he's like he's going away. So like in his mind that's the end of the interaction. But then this guy comes back, touches him, brings him back to talk to him again. Sounds like Theo is saying no again. Now it could be a misunderstanding. The music is loud, and this guy just doesn't didn't hear it or understand it. And then they're talking, and then it sounds like Theo is saying no again. And then the guy like leans in. It sounds like here though the guy saying huh, like he didn't hear him. I think I hear him saying huh. Huh. And maybe Theo's interpreting that aggressively or whatever. I don't know. But and then eventually pushes him back. But yeah, I don't know. Seems autistic. Seems autistic all around.

Popping balloons is a druggy term, too. And the dude used to be an addict for what? Doing poppers or Oh, no. Nice. Theo thought the guy was doing a drug joke and got mad. I don't know. I mean, the guy's holding balloons, although it could be an elaborate joke. I don't know. I think it's autistic to assume you can throw hands anytime there's a confusing moment with a potential personal space infraction in a loud crowded club. This didn't even look remotely close to a loud crowded club at all. There's like four people in the frame here. Looks like a few people around a table. Like maybe loud, sure. But the TMZ story reported that he harassed him. Well, they might, Are they just calling it harassment based on what this is? Do you know what poppers are? Alkalid nitrates or something? I don't know. People do it for getting [ __ ] in the ass. But that's different than the um like whippets or whatever, which I think is um is nitrous oxide usually. I think the is no long throat man holding balloons clearly antagonizing him. Jesus. Your point isn't that it's justified, just that you should expect it. No. Yeah. I mean, you probably shouldn't be that quick to attack somebody unless you like are identifying them as a threat or whatever. I think that's a pretty big escalation for no reason. But like if if you get in somebody's face like that, I would expect that you're you'd probably be ready for them to attack you. And if there's any question about the intentions, one eyewitness tells him he used crushing force. Was he [ __ ] Superman?

However, a source with direct knowledge tells us the guy with the balloons was with a group of people who had repeatedly harassed the comedian. That would change things a little bit. I mean, he still should just call the cops. I don't know why celebrities are ever getting into fights with people. It's not worth it. We're told they continued antagonizing Theo when used threatening language, saying they were trying to screw with him on camera. Is there any video footage of that? The altercation was down at 12:30 Club at Nashville. Activists in wheelchairs. Jesus. You can look in a jewelry box, a jewelry box of this nature, maybe a simple jewelry box, but if you look through it closely, you don't know what your child may be hiding. For instance, a gun, look at picture frames and behind them, cameras, try to determine what's what's taking place. Behind a picture frame, you can find bullets. You should always your child bring in his popular knapsack with many different locations. Look through it to see what exactly is your child carrying in addition to a book. Something simple as a crackpipe, something simple as a as a baby doll. Could be just a baby doll, but also it could be a place where you can secrete or hide drugs. Run your hands over the pillows and see if you feel anything that's unusual. Like a pillow like this with a button is a perfect invitation to hide something. And bumpy. I would reach in, see what it is. Just look and see what's inside your bookcases. It could be more than just books. Perfect place to hide. Little bit of crack. Little bit of cocaine.

Wait, hold on. Hey, I'm the fan got choked up by Theon. Let me tell you what actually happened. So, I'm not just a random fan. I live in Nashville. I play musical time. That's me. All of this happened on May 2nd. You can see right there. Which also happened to be my birthday. I had my gig from 6:00 to 10:00. My friends brought me cake. They brought me balloons. The bar brought me sparklers. So when Theo walked in, he didn't have any security with him. So people were walking up to him, talking to him, taking photos. I finished my show. This was like 10:18. Nobody in my party had talked to him yet, not even me. I thought it would be a funny video. I get to get him and me popping my birthday balloons together cuz he's a comedian. I was trying to be courteous cuz he was talking to somebody at the moment. So in this next video, you can actually hear me say, "I don't want to interrupt the conversation." I was waiting my turn to talk to him. Everybody was all just sitting around having fun, having a good time. Uh, nobody was bothering anybody. I mean, I'll show you the full video. That's the guy I was waiting for. This is where the video that you've seen starts. I went up and I said, "We pop some balloons with me." Turned away and looked like I said something offensive. I leaned in and said, "Hey man, I'm a fan. I'm just messing with you." He turned back around and then aggressively got in my face right there. I was confused. So, you see the lean and say, "What?" And that's when he grabbed my throat and shoved me back. What happened was a completely uncalled for reaction, especially when you consider the fact that nobody in my party had been badgering him for hours. We hadn't even talked to him. This was a 14-second interaction. That was it. As an entertainer in downtown Nashville, I get being overwhelmed by crowds and people coming up to you all the time. At the end of my shift, at least I get m M completely okay well I'm re absorbing this all for reaction especially when you consider the fact that nobody in my party had been badgering him for hours we was that a misspeak or was that an admission that they were going up to him and asking questions earlier that's a weird way to phrase that when you consider the facts that nobody in my party had been badgering him for hours we hadn't even talked to him this was a 14sec Second, those two statements are contradictory. We hadn't even talked to him. Nobody had been badgering him for hours. It could just be like a casual like, oh, like we like we had been badgering him for hours. We just talked to him for 14 seconds. It could mean that. But now I'm also thinking like, how common is it? Is this a thing that people do where you pop balloons for your birthday? Now I'm trying to think of how specific this thing is. I've never in my life heard Well, no. I No, I've never in my life heard that before. But maybe some people do this. You pop balloons for your birthday. This communist fireplace. Shut the [ __ ] up. American thing. Well, I am American. It's an ethnic thing. H I'm confused because he admits he was doing it to mess with him. But what's the joke there? Well, the joke is if this guy had a drug issue related to whatever drugs and then the guy's like using drug slang is that though. But this is another thing I'm also not I don't do these drugs very often. Is pop balloon? Somebody in chat said pop balloons is drug slang. Is it for what? For poppers or for um or for whippets? Is that really? Let's go pop balloons to do whippets. I don't do whippets off. I've only done like two or three of my life. So, I don't know if that's it's very common to have nitrous in balloons. But is that do people say that Destiny? He's a nitrous addict. You can take nitrous in a balloon. Yeah, that's how that's Yeah, that's how I've done it before. You have a little can, you fill the balloon up, and then you and you But the um but I don't know. I've never heard I've never heard that slang before. Let's go pop balloons or let's go do balloons or something. H people do say sometimes let's do some balloons. I don't know. This seems more like I could I'm understanding more how he feels like this guy's [ __ ] with him. Maybe. Maybe. I don't know. I also I don't know the policy at this bar. Um and I won't pretend to know the policy of this bar. I do know that appealing infinitely to my casino experience. Um, when we worked at the casino, if you were, now this is for employees, maybe not for invited like bands or whatever, but if you were an employee and if you ever got caught going up to because sometimes celebrities would visit the bar, um, visit the casino. If you ever got caught going up to a celebrity and asking them for a picture and autograph, you would get fired on the spot. Um, and that did happen to people because if they're going to places like this, they just want to like have fun and chill. And sometimes they'll talk to you. And if they if you're like having a back and forth or whatever and you like ask for a picture or something, then it's it's different. It's okay because it's like part of the maybe the interaction, but you never you would never as an employee you would get immediately fired for that. So it's kind of weird if this guy is literally in a band here, but but also maybe it's not weird if it's just like a casual bar and this isn't like a celebrity club or anything and the guy just wants a picture with the Obama. It might not be that weird actually. I don't know. I don't know. Need more information. Don't care. Dude, my mom found that eighth grade. Oh, no. Sorry. Dude, my mom found that eighth of an ounce, right? You sold me. I got a snitch, bro. She's calling the cops right now. You're [ __ ] dude. I'm stressed, bro. She was literally going to take away my PS4. You're probably going to jail. What the [ __ ] dude? I'm not going down alone, bro. Damn. Destiny, why would the birthday boy say it's just a joke if it wasn't joking with Nas? Why would the GF tell him to drop the balloons? I mean, that literally could go either way without us knowing, right? He could be like, "It's just a joke. Like, I'm just joking about like the drug shit." Or he could mean like, "It's just a joke. I just You don't have to pop balloons on me. Can you just get a picture?" Right? That could literally go either way. We need like I There's no way you can divine the intent of that interaction or these statements when we can't even hear what they're saying. And then we we we need more background information everything. He said, "I'm just messing with you." Which seems like he was kind of messing with him. Yeah. But messing with them how? You might not realize like do you understand how all of these can be read in two different ways? Like imagine you go up to some dude and he's like um like imagine you go up to some guy and you're at a [ __ ] I don't know you're at a bar and the guy's like [ __ ] I don't have my card on me or I left my credit card I can't pay for my drinks or whatever and then a dude's next to you like oh um what's up man did you uh do you need mom and dad here and then the guy looks at you and the guy looks like real pissed off and you're like I'm just [ __ ] with you dude like it's not a big deal but Like imagine this guy's parents died yesterday and he's like a popular guy who's it was Batman and when the guy when you say it was just a joke the guy doesn't know like are you joking with me as like you're just joking cuz my parents died or were you just joking like you said a random thing to joke with me and you're not actually making a reference to my parents dying right that's what cuz if if u ifo had a drug addiction or has drug addiction the guy's like oh I was just messing with you dude the guy might not be aware that that's what he's signaling he might not even be thinking about it maybe he's not a drug person at all and he's like oh I was just messing with about the balloon popping but Theo thinks the guy is saying oh I'm just messing with you about your drug addiction issue, bro. Like, who Yeah, that's what I'm saying. I don't know. Who knows? My girlfriend has been using AI to write love letters to me. How should I feel? based. Absolutely based. That's true love right there. It's basically just like um shortcutting the AI girlfriend process. Oh [ __ ] Is this an emote now? Who's the guy doing emotes? Can stop. Hold on. Can we make it a policy rule to push chat updates at midnight or something and I'm not streaming? It's weird when chat updates are being pushed when I'm live and there are random words flying across the screen and then I realize I need to refresh a browser or something because an emote update was pushed Okay. Why does it bother you though? Because it's annoying when I'm streaming and everybody's like screaming. I have to like refresh like three different chats or whatever because I'm and then I realize, oh, there's an emote update in the middle of the stream. Okay, what do we have? Court docks. Oh boy. Is it just the last two? Plaintiffs reply and support a motion. Plaintiffs reply and support a motion. Okay, give me a sec. One second. or use a restroom. Oo. Oh boy. My boy Gus owns all of Destiny's stupid tax rat arguments and why they don't work in one vid. I just got a new guitar. It's like a keyboard and guitar. I didn't really need this [ __ ] I just really wanted it, but I don't want to pay the tax. The can What happened to this guy? A white woman. it off. This whole damn video is just a ploy for me to go and buy this stupid and expensive toy. If I put this crazy in a skit, then the stupid IRS just can't do [ __ ] I recorded all my income and paid my rent. But believe me when I say this is a work expense. Casey got served today. breakdowns. It says she hasn't got a lawyer and apologizes to Ethan. Notifications we got about that. Um, we'll watch this after, I guess. Plaintiff Jane Doe's reply in support of motion for protective order governing public commentary by trial participants. Oh, they want to do a gag order on me, so I'm not allowed to talk about it, which is [ __ ] [ __ ] given. I will write a man. This will be my final manifesto. I will do a full write up on this entire thing from start to finish cuz nobody will cover this um unless I write it all up cleanly just in terms of like all the unhinged crazy depraved behavior that the other side has done uh in the course of this whole case. code comes now plaintiff Jane Doe by and through undersigned counsel and hereby submits her reply in support of her motion for protective order governing public commentary by trial participants and respectfully states as follows. Defendant's opposition to plaintiff's motion grossly m mischaracterizes the nature uh mischaracterizes the nature of the relief sought the applicable legal standards and the relevant facts. Plaintiff does not seek to muzzle the defendant nor does she seek to prevent him from defending himself in court. Yeah, no [ __ ] Sherlock [ __ ] Holmes. Rather, plaintiff seeks a narrowly tailored protective order that applies equally to all trial participants. Well, because she's already gotten her [ __ ] out there, but okay. and is only intended to curb the ongoing harassment, intimidation, and misrepresentation that threatens the integrity of these proceedings and deter witness participation. C. Proposed protective order, blah blah blah. Okay. The record is clear. Multiple potential witnesses have withdrawn their willingness to testify due to fear of retaliation and doxing by defendant and his followers. There's never been any evidence of this submitted ever, but okay. Defendant has made explicit threats of violence against plaintiffs witnesses. Again, Queen Andistle are not witnesses in this case, so it has nothing to do with that at all. But we can I guess you could just lie over and over and over and over and over and over and over again in every single motion I guess you file. But okay, disparaged plaintiff. True. her witnesses. Um, kind of true, but I mean like all of them are actively and continually chatting in just Discord server. Like what do you like? These are the least secretive people ever. Her witnesses and her attorneys in repugnant terms. Get over yourself. Who the [ __ ] cares? disclosed the sealed identity of plaintiff. Her name was literally posted on her gifts and

Go when she initially, um, published it. But also this was it was I her name was used the same day she filed for a protective order. After that, I haven't done it at all, and I've removed it when they've asked. But I like how she keeps saying this over and over again. And published private communications on platforms with hundreds of thousands of viewers. Yeah, there's not this isn't illegal. There's not a law against this, but defendant claims that plaintiff continues to attack and malign by now online, but provides no evidentiary support, nor can he for this false contention.

Defendant's opposition further asserts the plaintiff's public statements include vitriolic attacks on Banell and his attorneys, but again provides no evidentiary support, nor can he for this false statement. I mean, she tweeted about the denim [ __ ] No. Do they just say that that doesn't count here? But but plaintiff requests that these unsupported and false statements by defendant be stricken from the record pursuant to rule 12F of the federal rules of civil procedure. Plaintiff also requests that the court admonish defendant's council for litigating in bad faith and/or impose sanctions pursuant to rule 11.

I see that they have it looks like they have somebody else writing these now. Um, because this one is formatted quite a bit differently than the other ones. I wonder if they hired somebody else or if one of the other lawyers are writing these now. Are you not allowed to say her username? Pixie. I can say Pixie. I'm just not supposed to use her real name. This is [ __ ] though. Like when people do these cases with protective orders because they don't want to be known or they don't want to be associated publicly with the case. Pixie loves the public association. She wants to be publicly associated. She just doesn't want to be quote-unquote doxed, which is like a child's term that you use online for not wanting people to know your name, but it shouldn't really apply here in a court term.

Retroactively looking back, I wish you would have fought the initial protective order. I don't know if there's a likelihood of success on on winning there, but maybe it would just a waste of money. If I was representing myself, I would have fought the protective order. How are you going to ask for a protective order when you've already publicized all of this online and wrote a Substack and everything else about it? It would it's just it's an exceptional use of a protective order. And if you um if you look at any of the other cases around this, like nothing is ever done like this. Like this is just [ __ ] wild.

Um, instead, even the evidence submitted by defendant shows that plaintiff's limited public updates, in contrast, have been respectful and have not disclosed confidential information, threatened any party, or deterred any participant. Rather, they seek to encourage participants. H how do I even get participants on my side of this? I mean, I don't know what why would a person not being protected help you, Destiny? Um, there's a public interest to court proceedings being public. Um, there's a public interest to people's names and reputation. Like if you're filing stuff in public court, you're making a claim. You're basically saying that I think that I've been injured in such a way that I think the state needs to intervene and grant me relief for this particular thing. And all of us have a public interest in having access to the records on that. Is why all the court filings are public. Um, protective orders and things protecting names should be exceptional and they are exceptional rather than the rule for these types of um for these types of things.

But defendant's opposition ignores the governing standard the substantial likelihood of material prejudice test set forth in *Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada*, which courts in this district routinely apply. The proposed protective order meets the standard and is the least restrictive means of protecting the judicial process. I'm not going to bother reading all the underlying cases. Every time I do, they're horrendously miscited, but I don't know if it is or isn't here. Wait, if they are saying you provide no proof of her speaking and lying, why don't just submit the tweet to the court as evidence or whatever? We probably did in the last motion, but these guys just say whatever. They just lie over and over and over again. And until judges the judge starts ruling on things. I mean, I think we're supposed to get some rulings on these motions hopefully within a week, but the big one will be what the magistrate judge recommends in regards to the um uh the uh preliminary injunction. And then hopefully we get I get approval to uh go over that transcript publicly.

Contrary to defendant's framing, the proposed protective order is not an asymmetric gag order. It explicitly applies to all trial participants, including plaintiff. Um, didn't she imply that your lawyer was a rape defender on Twitter? Wouldn't that be an example of her attacking your lawyers? Yeah, I don't remember if um Andrew included that in a briefing or not, but yeah, I think she did tweet that initially that Destiny got the lawyer who defended, you know, these guys or whatever. Are your council or you uh planning to respond to these motions? Um, no. These are there's a name for it when you have a right of reply. Where are my lawyer people at? What's it called? Like a right to reply like we've already given our response or we've already given our response to their motion and I think this is their response to our response to the motion or something. [ __ ] Let me check. Hold on. We are not entitled to file a sur-reply. Sur-reply I'm guessing is like a required response to a thing. So we don't have a right to respond to the response. Basically, you should explain why they sealed it. For laypeople, it looks like it's the court siding with them because they have reasonable arguments to seal it rather than it being standard operating procedure. Well, they haven't sealed it yet. It's just sealed until the judge makes a ruling on it. I think generally when you request things to be sealed, they'll be sealed until the judge makes a ruling because if it's open and then they make a ruling to seal it, it kind of defeats the purpose, right? But I'm pretty sure that um I I think it I think it would be exceptional if they agreed to seal that after it was already an open court and they really didn't have any good legal arguments for it.

So it explicitly applies to all trial participants including plaintiff and prohibits only that public comments commentary which disparages, threatens or intimidates parties, council or witnesses. Disparages like what I can't say like it's so crazy discloses sealed identities or confidential attorney communications you don't need in order for this it's already not okay to disclose sealed identities or confidential communications that's why the identities are sealed and that's why these communications are if they're confidential so I don't know why um I don't know why you ask for an order about that. Misrepresents legal filings or court orders. How? Like, are you allowed to be [ __ ] If you think I'm incorrect about how I'm representing something, then fine. But I mean, like, I want to protect order against misrepresenting. Like, what does that even mean? Uh, okay. But discloses sensitive personal allegations or private details of the parties or witnesses. Like all of these people are constantly talking about me in Justicle server. Like I can't say anything about any of these people ever now. And also it applies to every single person like potential witness. I don't even know what a potential witness is in this case. Apparently anybody can be a witness ever. Trump could jump onto this case I guess. Such restrictions are well within constitutional bounds. Defendant's reliance on this case and this case for his contention that the proposed order violates his First Amendment rights is misplaced. Both cases are inappropriate or in opposite uh since they involve broad restraints on the press not on trial participants. The Supreme Court and other courts of appeals have recognized a distinction between participants in the litigation and strangers to it pursuant to which gag orders on trial participants are evaluated under a less stringent standard than gag orders on the press.

Oh, cute. Are they actually trying to read through the cases now and cite them in their their motions? Am I inspiring them on stream to do their job? Good job. I'm too lazy to dig through these cases, though. *Nebraska Press* is further distinguishable because the prior restraint was struck down due to the lower court's failure to consider less restrictive means or measures. *CBN* is also distinguishable because one there was no evidence of actual or potential prejudice in the to the proceedings and two it was a white-collar crime case where the courts have found a lessening of endangered prejudice compared to cases involving lurid subject matter which carry a more significant danger of prejudice. In contrast here, one, less restrictive measures would not suffice or sufface, and two, plaintiff has presented evidence of actual and potential prejudice, and three, the lurid subject matter of this case carries a high risk of prejudice. Three, plaintiff has demonstrated substantial likelihood of material prejudice.

Defendant contends the plaintiff has not demonstrated a substantial likelihood of prejudice to the proceedings because one, this case is an early prediscovery posture, and two, plaintiff has only demonstrated speculative harm or generalized discomfort. Both of these arguments fail. First, this case is not in an early prediscovery posture. Discovery has already commenced. Written discovery requests have already been exchanged by the parties and responses are due. However, the parties agreed to wait or await the court's ruling on plaintiff's motion for a protective order governing discovery before exchanging responses and documents. I don't know if there's like a formal distinguishing thing between pre-discovery and discovery and whatever. We haven't turned over any discovery yet because we're waiting for the court to rule in some motions. So, I I I don't know. Moreover, the case law relied on by defendant in support of the argument is in opposite in *Calhoun v. Invention Submission Corp*. The defendant requested that sanctions be imposed on plaintiff and/or council for posting the allegations of the complaint on a website. Discovery had not yet commenced and no trial date is scheduled, let alone on the horizon. Here in contrast, plaintiff has not moved for sanctions but for a protective order. And two, the defendant has not just posted the allegations of the complaint, but instead has harassed and vilified plaintiff, witnesses and her counsel and threatened bodily harm to witnesses. Okay. And discovery has commenced in a trial that has been set. Nor is *Constant v. Cosby* helpful to defendant since there the court entered an order imposing limits on attorney speech.

Second, defendant's argument the plaintiff has shown only speculative harm is clearly belied by the record. As detailed in plaintiff's motion and supporting declaration. Defendant has publicly threatened to kill potential witnesses. I'd kill them if I could. I want someone to kill named witnesses. Again, Justicle and Quean are not witnesses in this case, but as long as Kiwi Farms continues to post it, I guess that's they'll continue to copy-paste it. Um, I don't again I don't know how long you can just lie about something over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. Maybe maybe this will just be the lie that they carry if they get there all the way to trial. Maybe. Who knows? Um, disclosed plaintiff's legal name in violation of the court's anonymity order. Again, this happened before the protective order came out. Since then, not disclose the person's name. Um, and clearly the plaintiff didn't really care because they withheld that like the name was in the video for months so that they could have it in a motion, you know, six months into the case, I guess. But okay. Published confidential meet and confer communications published confidential I don't even know if these communications are supposed to be considered confidential but okay and engaged in a pattern of disparagement and ridicule directed at plaintiff, her witnesses and prospective witnesses and plaintiff's counsel. I mean, plaintiff has done the same to me I mean like you've when you've made a public Substack that is unhinged and contains like a [ __ ] ton of lies in it and then you cry that I think that you're a crazy person or like this. It's just so ridiculous, but whatever.

Um, plaintiff provided specifics regarding Bunnell's vitriolic public commentary and prospective witnesses' reactions to it, where I went through all of the declarations and I think I only saw one person um who said something but it wasn't even um Yeah, I don't know where these filings are. Somebody can lick it if you if it's there somewhere, I guess. See, ECF 44, 841, and 844. I guess we can look 841 and 844. PL provided specifics regarding Bunnell's vitriolic public commentary and prospective witnesses' reaction to it. This is 841 by Jane Doe. Oh, so this is just Pixie. I'm over 18 years of age. I'm guessing a comment on your oath a personalized. This is so [ __ ] [ __ ] dude. You She's just She's still running with the with This is just hearsay. This I'm sorry. This is double hearsay. One of the individuals whose screen name was Link. This is When was this filed? I don't even remember when this was filed. um June 2nd. Oh, right before the hearing. So, her evidence of people feeling threatened by me are one of these individuals whose name was censored told me that the defendant sent the video depicting me to their sister just a few months ago. This individual and their sister as well as other individuals who had initially contacted me completely deleted their accounts after Destiny posted his video on YouTube entitled "Destiny addresses lawsuit." So keep in mind just to be aware of what this this incompetent [ __ ] [ __ ] is doing, right? Is she filed a lawsuit against me and she didn't get statements, declarations, affidavits from any of the accounts that supposedly DM'd her. Like what the [ __ ] is wrong? How [ __ ] stupid do you have to be? What? Like what are you even doing at this point? You have why would you not get a single one of these in writing? Why would you not get any names or any statements or verify that any of this information is even [ __ ] true? But then she keeps throwing it over and over and over again in all of her like hello in this video defendant further violates my privacy by publishing to his almost 1 million followers out of context private messages. The three women that provided declarations under seal in support of plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction expressed fear of being publicly targeted or doxed. This is hearsay. Make them submit an affidavit or declaration saying it. You can't just speak for everybody. That's not how this works, little bro. You can't just say like somebody else said this. You have to they need to sign that. They need to attest to that under oath. They have to sign a thing saying that I promise this is my sworn and truth statement because maybe you're misinterpreting things or maybe they say they wouldn't said that. You I don't know why they keep doing this. I know why. It's cuz they're it's because it's malicious is the actual answer.

The three women that provided declarations under seal in support of plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction expressed fear of being publicly targeted or doxed by defendant and/or his followers and indicated they were unwilling to participate in discovery or testify unless their identities remain confidential. For this reason, the witness declarations were filed under seal. Like that's not in any of the declarations. But besides these three witnesses, there are four additional witnesses I have contact with, but they told me that they are afraid of speaking out or testifying against the defendant because it was likely retaliation and harassment. Attached here too as exhibit A is a true and correct copy of one of these witnesses named H who has communicated to me her fear of defendant. Desi tried to repeatedly dox one of these witnesses whose screen name is blank after he publicly expressed his support for me. That's not a witness. Somebody who expressed support, he's not a witness. The potential witness will not testify to pertinent information regarding the case unless his information be protected. Blank has expressed fear of providing any further information. Active defendant publicly called for his death on the defendant's YouTube channel. Uh, wait, have I? Or were they talking about on Willie Mac's YouTube channel? I'm pretty sure that was the thing that Willie Mack published me. I don't think I ever said any of I don't remember if I did or not. I don't to be honest, but The three other potential witnesses also believe that the defendant has committed crimes against them by disclosing intimate images of them. The three other potential witnesses are your three current witnesses, but they were afraid of pursuing legal action because of how he's publicly harassed and assaulted me and anyone who has supported me, including my council. Three of their of these witnesses have expressed to me their fear uh that their physical well-being could even put at risk if they attempt to pursue justice. Like, how does this even make sense? If you file it under seal, I still get access to the name. You think I'm willing to have these people like physically attacked, but if you file it under seal, I won't do that. Like, what? Why am I Destiny in the court filings and not Stephen or something? They go back and forth because they're mentally [ __ ] Almost every individual I've communicated with expressed not only their disgust for defendant's actions, but also their reluctance to speak out publicly due to their concern and fear of defendant retaliating against them. Wow. Wasn't that statement about Dist before they were mentioned as potential witnesses in this case anyway? Yes. Yeah. It was like months ago when Willie Mack interviewed me for a [ __ ] YouTube video. Yes. And it wasn't on my channel. It was on Willie Max or whatever. Oh, this text message. I I'm sorry. I just remember this one. My bad. They did submit this. Um, I just forgot about it because this is the most obviously faked [ __ ] message I've ever seen in my entire [ __ ] life. Steven Bunnell has abused his position of power and community to gain favor and harass people in the past. I find his actions deplorable and terrifying. I will never feel comfortable being a witness in this case against Steven unless my identity is protected. I fear for my family, friends, and my current and future careers. Without protection, I am almost certain I will receive harassment and doxing from his community. Nice based. And it's the first text message they got from this person. Good one. Okay. So, those are the two things that they submitted for evidence of my of prospective witnesses being afraid. Gotcha. Wait. Surely there is some official affidavit from this person um that they should have filed instead of this weird written text message screenshot. No, because they don't have any witnesses for this case because this entire thing is [ __ ] [ __ ] and they know it's [ __ ] [ __ ] which is why all of this is like either hearsay from Pixie. Um oh it's one through four, not just because this is 81-4 to 814-4. I see. Um, it's just I don't have money for a lawyer or anything. Once he knows my name or something, I'm afraid he's going to harass me or get others to do so. And then like what Jessica doesn't even have any what the like what what is he doesn't even have any information relevant to this case. Are what is the is the claim that I'm sending him video like we're jerk buddies? Like what? It's so [ __ ] crazy. But okay, my jerk mate duo. Yeah.

Contrary to defendant's blithe contention that plaintiff failed to tie her alleged harm to any specific statements or conduct attributed to Bonell, the evidence presented it shows that defendant's actions have caused multiple prospective witnesses to refuse participation and has hindered evidence gathering and thus prejudiced these proceedings. Um, when was my first when was my first YouTube video response published? What was the date on that? Wait, I thought there was a YouTube video linked in here. Am I crazy? Is the link just not in a different color? Oh, wait. That's not my This purpose purpose. "Destiny addresses his lawsuit." This is February 20th. That text message was on January 22nd. Had I said anything publicly about this yet? How is my how are my statements in the future scaring defendants in the past? Because that text message that they cited here, first of all, this is just was not relevant to this case at all. He has no discover. There's nothing relevant. This person said that they were afraid of me on January 22nd. Had I even said anything yet about this when did Pixie drop her thing on January 20th? Like they're already afraid. Like what? Seriously? Okay. Time moves in one direction. Don't forget. Oh, she's the one that linked my YouTube video on February 20th. Okay. Um, the evidence presented has shown the defendant's actions cause multiple prospective witnesses to refuse participation and has hindered evidence gathering and thus prejudiced these proceedings because they have no evidence. So they have to evidence gather after making the public Substack and after filing the lawsuit in the hopes they're like praying that somebody comes forward with some magical piece.

Of evidence. But okay, this is precisely the kind of conduct that the Gentile standard was designed to address.

See also Shepherd v. Maxwell, defendant falsely argues that plaintiff's evidence is vague and unsubstantiated and relied on unnamed and/or yet unidentified witnesses. This is true. In fact, plaintiff's declaration and supporting evidence show that she specifically identified four potential witnesses that have communicated their reluctance to participate due to their fear of defendants' doxing and vicious attacks. ECF 85.

What is even um um I'm just curious. I should have um I should have unredacted versions of these, right? Um, is that your fault if they are afraid of you? Don't they need to show actual proof that something happened? They testified kind of. Yeah, it has to be it can't be generalized. It has to be um it has to be like specific and traceable or some [ __ ] Okay. Wait, what are these? Hold on. Give me a sec. I'm sorry. Wait, not this. They sent me what? They they sent the versions that they sent me were redacted. So, I don't even know personally who these What the [ __ ] Seriously, these are I have the same document. Okay. So, there are people who are afraid of me and I don't even know who. Okay. Based absolutely based. Oh, this image is redacted. So, I don't know that one. This is redacted. I don't know that one. Oh, and that message is red. Cool. All right. Cool. That's good. Based. Okay. So, I don't know. I have no further information. I wouldn't be able to tell you guys publicly. It'd be nice to know for my own case. Um, so I could like defend myself, but that's cool. That's fine. I don't have to know any of it, I guess.

In fact, L declaration putting evidence to show that she specifically identified four potential witnesses. What does that even mean? That have communicated their reluctance to participate due to their fear of defendants' doxing and vicious attacks. The names of these witnesses were redacted in the declaration. They haven't submitted an emotional following. She was submitted. Um, moreover, the three witnesses who have agreed to testify and provided declarations would only do so under seal due to their fear of defendants' retaliation. See, but they leaked basically the names for all these people anyway. So, a good one. Um, also I read all of these declarations. I think only one of them mentioned anything about being afraid um or wanting to remain anonymous. The declaration of Brooke, she doesn't say anything about being afraid or wanting to be anonymous. That was the first one that was submitted. Um, the declaration of AbbyMC, she says it she doesn't want her real name revealed, yet they leaked the and they keep referring to her over and over again as Abby MC, which is [ __ ] stupid.

Um, for documentary 494, um, they don't they're not even a witness to this case. I don't even know what the [ __ ] this person is doing here. Um, like the like none of the witnesses are even relevant to this case. Like here's an anonymous witness. I am over the age or I'm above the age of 18 and competent testimony. I have personal knowledge of matters are in blah blah. Okay. Beginning of May 25th, 2024, I began exchanging messages with the defendant Steven Gabanell on Instagram on Discord where I engaged as a fan. There after beginning May uh late May 2024, our conversations progressed and became more personal. We began exchanging private sexual content with one another and Destiny shared graphic sexual content himself alone as well as graphic content depicting others himself and other individuals engaging in sexual acts. Destiny shared some of these videos with me directly via Discord messages but the majority of them were shared through a Google Drive link which he sent me via Discord for the first time on or about June 2024. The graphic sexual content that he shared with me was mostly digital videos although some were digital photographs as well. I ceased contact with Destiny on or about November 5th, 2024. I subsequently became aware of the allegations that have been online leaks of Destiny engaging in sexual acts with individuals on or about January 21st, 2025. I became aware of Jane Doe's post on Twitter where she alleged in part that Destiny had to share the videos of them engaging in sexual acts without her consent. Shortly thereafter, I reached out to Jane Doe on Twitter and informed her that I was concerned that Destiny had been sharing private sexual content without consent, stating in part that quote, "Back in spring/summer, he had sent me videos with other girls. I assumed that he had consent for these, but I realized he likely didn't." Although I had access to the message between Destiny and myself at this point, sometime afterward, I discovered that I deleted the message between him and him and Discord. Uh, and subsequently discovered that I no longer access the Google Drive containing the graphic sexual content, which we deleted. This is like what is this? this like this person isn't even claiming that they got anything from me of Pixie, number one. And then number two, they don't even have any context on like, oh, well, I think these other videos weren't okay. Like, what even is this? This is it's not even relevant to this case. Um, let's see. That's one. And then this is their other quote-unquote witness.

On about April 2022, I reached out to the defense team with Kon the second via Twitter. Shortly thereafter, we got to arrange together in blank where we began a sexual relationship. Thereafter, Destiny and I remained in contact as being friendly with his wife at the time, Molina at some point as he asked me if I was comfortable with him sharing videos or pictures of sexual content himself as well as himself and his wife. I told him that I did consent to him sharing these videos um with me. Thereafter, we began sharing pictures and videos of sexual content with one another. Mostly him alone, although at least one of these or at least one of these videos included himself and his wife. On or about mid-to-late April 23, uh Destiny invited me to blank where he was staying briefly while at blank. Destiny recorded himself when I engaged in sexual acts; recordings made with my consent and I authorized him to share the recordings with his wife exclusively. I did not authorize Destiny to share the recordings with anyone else or otherwise make them public. Thereafter, I continued to connect with Destiny online. In late November 2024, I was asked by multiple individuals while on Discord to inform me that a video of Destiny and myself was believed online. After confirming this was the case of Destiny um I don't I don't know if I'm allowed to speak to our well I'm not revealing who this is. So who told me that he was sorry that any videos involving myself had leaked because of him. Destiny also told me that he only shared this content with a single individual who went by the screen name Rose. I don't believe that's true. Uh following this conversation, I received a message from multiple women on Discord and Twitter who had been in contact with Destiny who told me that Destiny had shared with them sexual content depicting myself as well as others. Sometime after the November 29th leaks, I discovered that Destiny deleted messages between himself and I related to the foregoing. So the ironic thing is, and I can bring this up right now, but I I won't because I don't want to reveal what it is. They deleted their messages with me, which is funny because we had talked after this and we're still friends after this. And then I looked at my Discord one day and I noticed, oh [ __ ] they've deleted all of their messages with me. But I also found out that they were hanging out in a certain just Discord. But also, regardless of all of that, this has also has nothing to do with this case. What? Like what is what why is this even here? Like this person has nothing related to the actual complaint following Pixie. This person's not making allegations. Like there's literally no point for this even being here. It's they have so much random [ __ ]

So, the fact that they're trying to say that, "Oh my god, these witnesses are intimidated." They're not even witnesses. These aren't witnesses to this case. These are like literally um these are like random statements that you've collected from people to just throw on that literally have nothing to do with any of this. Like I I don't even know what I can respond to for these. Like, it's not even the subject matter here. But defendant's attempts to ignore or downplay the harm he is causing falls flat in the face of the overwhelming evidence presented. Defendant declared the following about two potential witnesses. Potential witnesses. That's why people like Jessica and Queen if I could put their [ __ ] balls in a vice and crush them and then feed it to them and then slice their arm and kill them. See blank at minute 5642. When did I even do this interview? interview. I feel like this interview was done in like January or February. This um does Willie say one, this interview was done a long time ago. Two, this isn't even published on my channel. Three, these people are not parties to this case. These people are not witnesses. They have nothing to do with any of this and none of my commentary about the media has anything to do with this case. So, it's like it's so [ __ ] stupid. This commentary is not merely uncomfortable or critical as defendant absurdly claims, but rather violent and extremely prejudicial. This commentary undeniably deters witness cooperation and undermines the administration of justice. Both of these people, Queenman and Jistle, have talked about me incessantly for months after. Clearly, they're not deterred and clearly they're not afraid. So, like, what are we even talking about here? Like, these people talk about me almost daily.

In another of defendant's incriminating streams, I love how they say that he recently accused the plaintiff and her counsel of fabricating evidence. I love also how we're being honest now. Thank you. We're just taking straight rips from Kiwi Farms. https://uploads.kiwifarms.st/data/video/slash also their links are broken half the time so I don't even know I'm sure the judge will figure it out like actually [ __ ] clown show that they're literally just control+f5ing my Kiwi Farms thread every day for their next legal argument but that's cool to just waste my time and destroy my life and my reputation everything else over this nice thank god my prior circle of friends is respectful enough though to not make any commentary about this at all on the other side of it but only on mine very uh spine spine-possessing people. Defendant tells his hundreds of thousands of followers, I bet this is a fake message and clearly opposing counsel and plaintiff are dumb enough to fake this in the stupidest way possible. Oh, is that about the the declaration that I'd already read? I think it is a fake message. I don't believe it. I don't believe it. And I'll say it again. Put me in your next filing. Defendant has failed to refute the overwhelming evidence consisting of his vitriolic and threatening public commentary, its impact on witness participation and his actual and ongoing harm to these proceedings. To allow defendant to continue with his unfettered public commentary will jeopardize the integrity of these proceedings and impair plaintiff's right to present witnesses. Saying all of this while is saying all of this while while even temporarily sealing the transcript where we spoke in front of a [ __ ] judge is the ultimate in cuckoldry in spineless weaponization of the legal system and in weaponizing the of the white woman status to seal the transcript where we're both under oath and we have to answer honestly in front of a [ __ ] judge. And it's not just the unhinged uh deranged and incoherent ramblings of a of a schizo lunatic that can apply to either plaintiff or her counsel. Like it's actually it's it's subhuman behavior. Like The protective order is the least of means. Uh defendants contends that vi I don't know what that means. Good job. Voardier. Voardier. A preliminary examination of a witness or a juror by a judge or counsel. Wait, wasn't this a public hearing? How can they make it private? It was public. I don't think they can make it private. Hopefully, the judge should rule against that, but we have to wait for the judge to rule on it. Has it voir that's what he said right vadier vadier contends that voadir jury instructions or confidentiality orders are sufficient alternatives; they are not. This case is still in the pre-trial phase and voadir does nothing to address ongoing harm to witnesses, witness intimidation and/or the risk of future disclosures of confidential material. The proposed order is narrowly drawn, addresses only the harmful conduct already documented and preserves all rights to file pleadings and argue the case in court. Moreover, although protective orders governing discovery are standard in cases such as the instant one involving sensitive personal information, not only did defendant refuse to cooperate with plaintiff's efforts towards a stipulated confidentiality agreement, but he has actually opposed plaintiff's motion for a protective order governing discovery. And although that protective order would serve to protect confidential sensitive information of the parties, it would not prevent the defendant from continuing his public doxing and threatening and false commentary.

Defendant contends that a proposed protective order may restrict his right to defend himself. The narrowly tailored order does no such thing unless his right to defense involves attacking and threatening plaintiff, witnesses, and counsel. It does not. The First Amendment does not protect speech that interferes with the fair administration of justice. The fair administration of justice. My god.

Defendants' attempts to construe plaintiff's motion as nothing more than an attempt to restrict public access to this court is nonsensical. The pleadings are available to the public and nothing in the proposed order seeks to alter public access. That's literally what a seal does or unless they're talking about the that's what a protective order if they're if they're filing to protect names and stuff. That's literally what it does is to keep stuff off the public record. Um, but okay. Say the judge sees through this [ __ ] Is it possible for the plaintiff forced to do like a full public retraction or something? Uh, no. They would never. I would have to like counter seal or something like that or counter sue or something. But the applicable precedent supports the entry of the narrowly tailored proposed protective order. Defendant fails to distinguish the controlling precedent relied on by plaintiff in her motion. Indeed, the opposition fails to even address or attempt to distinguish the primary case relied on by plaintiff, Hernandez, in which the district of Florida imposed restrictions on trial participant speech after finding it likely to prejudice and no less restrictive means. Defendants' opposition fails to address the critical vested commentary and targeted speech that threatens the integrity of judicial proceedings. Do you get the vibe that does lawyer hates you personally because she's seen all your negative comments? Um, I think it's I think they do because it's a personal friend. That's what I I'm pretty sure it's a personal family friend. Um particularly through the intimidation or silencing of witnesses, restrictions on extrajudicial statements by trial participants are both lawful and necessary. The evidence submitted showing the defendant has publicly threatened, disparaged, and attempted to dox potential, specifically identifiable witnesses demonstrates precisely the kind of conduct these authorities contemplate. The Southern District of Florida recognized in Hernandez, um, when witness participation is chilled by public attacks, courts may impose narrowly tailored speech restrictions as the least restrictive means of safeguarding the proceedings. This motion does not seek to silence one party or prevent any valid defense. It is about protecting vulnerable witnesses from intimidation and ensuring that testimony may proceed free from fear or retaliation.

Defendant misleadingly claims that this is a low-profile civil dispute, opposing thing page 11. It is not there. I wonder what this was in the context of I mean it's a civil case. It's not like a huge corporate litigation thing and it's not a criminal case, but there have been numerous press releases and articles about it and hundreds of thousands of people tune into defendants' streaming platforms to hear his distorted version of the proceedings and allegations as I just read the court documents. But okay, and to listen to and encourage with financial remuneration his abuse of the plaintiff, her witnesses, and her counsel. They keep bringing this up over and over and over again despite the fact that I've lost money on this. And they know that too because that was also part of our hearing, which is probably another reason why they want to keep it sealed. I think this woman could have had law school paid for but went this route instead. I think she already took the LSAT so she probably took it and got like a [ __ ] 70 on it and was like, "Fuck me. We'll just play lawyer instead." This is not the run-of-the-mill civil dispute, but rather a high-profile dispute with lurid content and a trial participant, the defendant, who has his own streaming platforms with almost 1 million followers. This scenario only exacerbates the high risk of prejudice to these proceedings due to defendants' threatening, harassing, and false commentary. Plaintiff's limited public comments do not warrant denial of the order. Defendant argues that plaintiff's own public statements undermine her request. This is false. Equivalence. Plaintiff's posts consist of announcements of procedural rulings. For example, sealing of witness identities. A fundraising effort. Defendant should certainly not object to plaintiff's GoFundMe page. It's a give and go page. Got him. Since he has been profiting immensely from this case by streaming on a regular basis about it. Uh my lawyer fees are up to about $200,000 so far. I have not made that much money um talking about this case. Uh not to mention uh canceled shows, reputational harm that will likely never go away. Um and everything else involved in this, but that's cute to say this over and over again. They really, really, really like to run with this argument. This profit revenue is evidenced by the number of views on his videos about the case and the number of comments and questions. For example, streamers such as Defendant receive revenue from their YouTube channels based on memberships, AdSense revenue. Streamer gets paid based on the number of users viewing ads and super chats. User pays to have his or her message highlighted in the live chat during a stream. The more money is paid, the more likely the stream will read the message aloud or respond to the question. Um, a fundraising effort in general calls for information relevant to her case or witnesses. Again, I'm sorry, little bro, but if you want to be a big boy or big girl and you want to be an adult and you want to file a court case, then you should file the case with your affidavit and everything in hand. If you're filing a case with nothing on on pure [ __ ] lies and copium, which is what she has done, and she has she knows that she's done that. Um, and then you're praying to God that after attacking my reputation as hard as you can, after going after everything I have as hard as you can, praying that somebody comes forward to substantiate your [ __ ] case. That's that's on you for being a [ __ ] [ __ ] Sorry. CCF 992 to 95. And in stark contrast to defendant, none of plaintiff's posts involve threats, harassment, vilification, saying that I'm lying about her age over and over again, saying that she was 19, saying that I purposefully wanted uh my sexual content to be leaked and spread all over the [ __ ] internet. All of that, none of that was vilification. Seriously, exposure of sealed identities, identity. And again, it wasn't sealed yet. It was the same day but or publication of confidential materials. I don't know what they're even referring to there. Plaintiff has not doxed, intimidated or mocked any party or witness. There is no evidence the plaintiff's limited posts have deterred witness participation or jeopardized trial fairness. While there is ample evidence the defendants' posts have done so. See above for their declarations of people that aren't even relevant to this case, based. Um, defendant distorts the request for relief by arguing that the protective order would allow plaintiff to broadcast her message while silencing him. But it is patently clear that the request for relief would apply equally to both plaintiff and defendant and seeks only to silence threatening, harassing and false commentary. See ECF 845. I forget. Did their thing allow them for her to keep her stupid [ __ ] GoFundMe up, her give seno up? Is it just me or does this feel like it hinges entirely on the premise that you leaked everything to Kiwi Farms intentionally despite you being the one most? Yes, it does. I think that's one of the overarching narratives that kind of got destroyed at the hearing, which I think is one of the reasons why another one of the reasons why they wanted that transcript sealed. And it was funny. This is one of the things that I was like happy about is I could see the um cuz the the judge kept asking questions where he's like, "Wait, so he published that to Kiwi Farms and then she like, "Well, no, someone else." I was like, "Oh, okay." Or when she was talking about when I found out that she'd sent all of our videos to her um ex. And the judge is like, "Wait, he sent all of your guys' videos to your

ex-boyfriend." And then she's like, "No, no, no. I sent our videos to my ex." I was like, "Oh." Like, like he was at like I could see the lights turning on on the judge, and he was like, "Wait, what?" Or like, this is wait, really? Um, but hopefully we can read the transcript soon.

Prohibited content that harasses, threatens, or intimidates parties. Publicize or repeat any sensitive personal allegations or private details underlying the claims. Publicizes or repeats any confidential settlement discussions or communications, which are federal rule superior 408. You're going to have—Wait, is this even a real protective order? And part of it is—misrepresents or mischaracterizes the content of legal filings? What rule for compromise offers and negotiations? Prohibited uses. Evidence of the following is not admissible on behalf of either party, of any party, either to prove or disprove the validity or amount of a disputed claim or to impeach by a prior inconsistent statement or condition. Furnishing, promising, or offering, or accepting, promising off a valuable uh valuable consideration and compromising, attempting to compromise the claim and conduct or a statement made during compromised negotiations about the claim except when offered in a criminal exception. Just me. Wait, what? I'm sorry. Am I not understanding this? This this federal rule of civil procedure, it sounds like it has to do with whether or not like things that you say during negotiations for like a settlement are admissible as evidence towards the validity of the claim or whatever. This doesn't sound like it has anything to do with um protecting uh communications. Is there—am I looking up the correct federal rules of civil procedure 408 compromise offers? Okay, I'll just keep reading. I'm sorry.

As a matter of general agreement, evidence of an offer to compromise a claim is not receivable in evidence as an admission of—as the case may be—the Okay, yeah, this makes sense. So like if I—So for instance, if I'm if like this makes sense. Let's say that I'm like, "Okay, [ __ ] it. Let's [ __ ] let's settle. Let's have a discussion." Right? We've had discussions on settlement. Oh, I'm leaking more information. Let's say that I was to say, "Okay, fine. I'm going to settle. Um, I'll give you X dollars." You know, we make a statement or whatever. And then that's fine, right? And you're like, and then they're like, "M, no." And then let's say that like later on in the case, they file. And by the way, I know that he's guilty of this because when we were having discussions of settlement, he offered me x amount of dollars, right? That's what it sounds like rule 408 is governing. Not like evidence like you can't submit evidence to prove or disprove the validity or amount of a disputed claim based on the settlement discussions, as with evidence of subsequent remedial measures dealt with in rule 407. Inclusion may be based on two grounds. One, the evidence is irrelevant since the offer may be motivated by a desire for peace rather than from any concession of weakness positions. Two, a more consistently impressive ground is promotion of the public policy favoring the compromise and settlement of disputes, whether it was ordinarily phrased in terms of offers or compromise. I'm sorry. Okay, this is why I don't—um—this is why I don't read their reading their citations is painful. I don't I don't know why this was cited here. Sorry.

€20. Mandami has said that he wants the city to run supermarkets. Do you agree that it's idiotic? The profit that capitalism product is already low—thanks to capitalism—will not bring down prices. I mean, yeah, personally, I think it's a dumb thing, but I mean, we'll see what happens. But um, hold on. Just make sure looking at the correct. Yeah, I am. Okay. This is—remember that they described this order as incredibly narrowly tailored. So they're saying this is a narrowly tailored order. And the order is—no person covered by this order shall make or cause to be made any public statement, including on live streams, podcasts, social media platforms, blogs, or to the press that disparages, harasses, threatens, or intimidates the parties, witnesses, potential witnesses, or either party's council. Okay. What is—what does that even mean? What is a potential witness? Like somebody named in the um in the um like pre-trial disclosures? Publicizes or repeats any sensitive personal allegations or private details underlying the claims of this action. What does that even mean? I can't even talk about the subject matter of the court case. Like publicizes or repeats any confidential settlement discussions or communications which are protected. They're not protecting us or any meat income for communication council. What? So I can't bring up the fact that she was—what?—threatening to kill herself if I didn't pay her off, or that they were asking for $15 million from me initially? Publicly identifies the plaintiff or witnesses whose declarations have already have been filed under seal or speculates about the identity of witnesses or potential witnesses, particularly in derogatory, demeaning, or inflammatory terms. So I can't even say if I think somebody's lying. I have to—I can't say that like the allegations against me are false. This is not true. What? Misrepresents or mischaracterizes the content of legal filings, discovery, court orders, or the position of any party or attorney—that what the—is supposed to be narrowly tailored? This is basically—this is basically a 100% gag order. Like, so I just can't say anything at all about the case anymore. Like that's basically what this is looking at. To call this narrowly tailored is insane, but okay.

Ah, okay. Sorry. That was the first meme. Um, and then the second meme is—Oh, I think we filed—I think we filed to have the one—the Abby MC [ __ ] completely tossed because it was just for—I don't—I don't read. It was a ridiculous uh submission. But is that their proposal for a gag order? Basically, yes. They call it a protective order, but that's basically what it was. Plaintiff Jane Doe's reply in support of motion to file redacted evidence in support of the declaration of ABMC and for leave to file under seal. So, first of all, when they filed ABMC's [ __ ] [ __ ] declaration, they should have attached the evidence to it. I don't know why they didn't. They probably didn't even have it at the time because they don't give a [ __ ] if any of the people talking to them are even making real uh allegations against me or not, which is evidenced by the fact that they were relying on DMs from people whose identities they hadn't even ascertained before filing the [ __ ] complaint and then graveling in front of the judge for a temporary restraining order two months after filing the case and then trying to blame their cancer treatments on their late filings. It's so ridiculous. Don't take the—Don't take the [ __ ] case. If you can't balance chemo and motions at the same time, why you—why you—like I don't even know if you're competent to practice at that point, but whatever. Defendants attempt to strike the evidence corroborating the declaration of Abby MC reeks of desperation. The evidence corroborating this is not a corroboration. This is her initial claim that should have been included. It is not corroborating evidence to include a text message. Also, by the way, just to be clear, this is the evidence that she submitted to the—that she gave to the lawy—the attorneys. By the way, Destiny sends me sex tapes all the time and he thinks I don't know the girls in them, but I have videos of him [ __ ] Cherry and Pixie like Lympho. He just sent me another one. Haven't opened it. Let's see who he's [ __ ] this time. He should be more careful. Basically lio—this is the totality of the evidence that this person has that I've ever sent them anything—which I haven't—because another thing they admitted in the hearing um that they said very clearly I think on two different occasions was um this person never gave them any evidence whatsoever that I actually sent her anything—there was no evidence of that ever submitted ever—they admitted that they hadn't seen evidence of it at all—and I also know this is the person who I showed was apparently taking pictures of my [ __ ] computer when they were at my house. So, I don't even know what they've seen or haven't seen—all my computer or what—cuz like this like this video doesn't even exist. This is even a real thing. I've never—This is not even a real thing. Also, they—I like how they also edited part of a redacted [ __ ] filing to—what—you couldn't redact the—the person's message. But what—this is their—this is the totality of evidence that this person has. It's like this, in case you're not aware, this is the one thing right here. This is the entire case is built on this one message. The entire motion for summary judgment that we're filing, right, on whether or not the case will get tossed, whether we have to actually go to trial, all of it will come down to whether or not the judge thinks that this is a factual dispute that would need to be settled um in a jury trial. It will all come down to this one singular message. I don't know how judges ordinarily rule um on evidence stuff like this, but—

Y'all should depose Abby. Abby MC, you mean? Because I don't know who the other person is. Um, yeah, maybe if it gets so far, maybe we'll do a deposition. Hold on one second. Does the judge differentiate between loaded words and their actual meanings? Like when you say corroborating? Oh, I don't know. I'm just saying that like they're acting like they're submitting more and more evidence that's corroborating this person's statements, but it's not corroborating evidence. This is just the text message that u—they referred to in their first declaration. It should have been submitted with her declaration, but I don't know why they didn't. I thought you tried to serve them and they couldn't be found. Yeah, we're trying, but—That text doesn't even prove you sent the um Pixie one before October 2022. You mean after? Yeah. No, it doesn't prove anything. And like I said, I've gone through my messages with this person and I haven't done—it's—it's just not true. The person is lying. Um, it seems like there's just an endless back and forth of film. When is there going to be any rulings? Well, these motions should be ruled on soon, and then hopefully we get something from the magistrate judge soon relating to the preliminary injunction. But like judges are busy. They're not going to be like proofreading every single motion or going through all this [ __ ] Yeah. Um, do they need proof of this part of the trial? Well, I mean, that's—you could argue that their proof is her testimony, right? The proof would be her saying um, he sent me those videos. And so I mean if—if—if it was an—if it was a very conservative judge—again, I don't know what the standards are—like the strict standards are for summary judgment—like an incredibly conservative judge I guess could theoretically rule and say, well, this is a material fact dispute and it's not up for the judge to make a ruling on that. So then the entire trial would basically be putting Abby on the stand and then having her testify. Um, but she must agree to be deposed and answer any questions before uh MSJ. Oh, motion for some. Oh, maybe that's true. Maybe if she refuses to be deposed, then maybe it gets tossed. I guess what reason—um—what would be the reason for you to not show publicly all the DMs with this person? Um, because technically—technically—um—why not? Wait, was there a reason for this? Oh, I don't know if it would count as like revealing the person or whatever. So, I don't even know if I would need to. Also, I'm not dumping my whole DM history. It's [ __ ] gross. Um, but I—but I mean like—like I said—like I went through and I looked at the particular date and I know which two videos I was talking about. Both of them refer to—it's—I know exactly which two videos and it was nothing to do with this complaint or any of the people involved in this complaint. It is nothing related to that. Like I know exactly what they were when I was referring to on that date. Um, and this person probably should know as well. Like you can even tell by reading their responses to me that they know what it was. So, this is just a—it's a total [ __ ] lie. But I think that this person is—I could say much about them, but this—they have their own set of problems. But um, anyway, um defendants attempt to strike the evidence corroborating the declaration of MMC reeks of desperation. See defendants opposition.

For months, the defendant has been gloating on his platforms to his hundreds of thousands of followers that despite his heinous acts, he will not be held accountable because he allegedly shared the video prior to the effective date of Cardi. No, I have not said that I think anything wrong happened or that anything was done, you know, non-consensually, whatever. Uh, that's a—that would be an argument that we could have uh if they had subject matter jurisdiction. But the first argument we're going with is—of course—is you're trying a case that you don't even have the authority to file in federal court. You chose to file in federal court, and you chose to file under the statute, and you chose to deliberately lie in the filings. One, claiming that you had evidence from people that didn't exist or that you hadn't gathered evidence from, and two, by lying and misstating the date of a submitted text message in order to bring it in so you could file this in public court in federal court so that you could have your fun day parading around on the internet like you're—like you meant something. Um, so that's on you. Sorry. Indeed, today defendants entire defense has hung its hat on this alleged lack of subject matter jurisdiction. That's wrong, and that's a lie. But I can't read the court transcript where we talked about this in front of the judge. So I guess you got me there for now. But despite defendants harassing and threatening commentary intended—intended to prevent witnesses from coming forward on plaintiff's behalf, a brave witness did come forward and provided a declaration evidencing that defendant shared the video with her after the effective date of Cardi, thereby defeating defendants's only defense. Okay, that's not my only—without the IBMC testimony and evidence. Ever—there are strong legal grounds for finding subject matter jurisdiction under—under inia—the ongoing distribution doctrine. So there's another Kiwi Farms argument where they're saying—well, if you send a link to a thing—technically you're always continually and forever sending it. But again, my counter argument there is that means that every single thing you ever send ever is always being continually forever sent. That would be true of every single digital platform ever—which is—which is [ __ ] stupid. There's—I've never seen a court case ever that uses this standard to—to determine ongoing distribution, but they're welcome to cite one if they can find it. Although actually, I think also—I think in the hearing—I think they admitted that they had zero case law to back that claim up as well. Um, defendants's opposition relies on false and misleading statements. A mischaracterization of the evidence and inapplicable case law in its futile attempt to strike the corroborating evidence. The very premise of the opposition is false. The evidentiary hearing on plaintiff's motion already occurred. Now, on the eve of the court issuing a ruling on her motion, plaintiff seeks to submit new and untimely evidence in support of her motion, depriving Banell of an opportunity to respond or to challenge the declarant in open court. The actual facts are that one, Adam's decoration was submitted on May 2nd, 2025, in support of plaintiff's reply to opposition. Two, motion for a preliminary uh injunction. Yeah, but not her actual text message. Um, how are you allowed to talk about stuff in the hearing when it is sealed? I mean, it's just the transcript that's sealed. I should be able to talk about the hearing. I—It's—I mean, I was there, and it's—it was public. It was a public hearing. Um, the only thing that's sealed is the transcript. Two, the declaration specifically referenced and quoted a text chat thread in which ABMC told her friend that she had just received a sexually explicit video of plaintiff from Bonell um 49-2. I don't even remember what her original thing looked like. Wait, does it quote anything here? I told my friend that the destiny sent me another video of him and another woman that I recognized as the streamer with the screen name Cherry. That's not even what she said. It doesn't even match the—That doesn't even match what she—the additional set that she filed. She said that I told my friend that I sent me another video of him and another woman that I—that just another person. She—So, she doesn't even accurately summarize. I—I don't even—I'm not gonna say anything or whatever. Maybe the—like her—her aid here doesn't even match the—the text messages that she submitted, but okay. Um, the specifically referenced and quoted a text chat thread. I don't see any quotations here or quote marks unless I'm missing something, but okay. Maybe quoted means something different to them. The evidence is not new, but rather is evidence corroborating ABMC's declaration in the form of a screenshot of the referenced and precisely quoted text chat thread. The evidence was submitted before the June 3rd preliminary injunction. I like how they don't put the date that they submitted this evidence, but they do put the date they submitted her original declaration. The June 3rd preliminary injunction hearing. By the way, the evidence that they submitted of her corroborating text message was on June 2nd, by the way. But okay, good one. Wait, [ __ ] What is the—Wait, was it this? Sorry, it was this. Sorry. It's just—it's annoying because like it seems like I'm being a stickler here, but um—this is—remember this is the only piece of evidence that is keeping this case alive. They know it. This is why they are desperately trying to salvage what they—they—they know this is alive. They're desperately trying to salvage this. And it's just irritating that they're not even summarizing their own evidence correctly. Right. So they say that the declaration specifically referenced and quoted a text chat thread in which ABMC told her friend that she had just received a sexually explicit video of plaintiff um—wait. Did I just misread this? Okay. The declaration specifically referenced a quoted text chat thread in which Aly told her friend that she just received a sex video of plaintiff. Oh, wait. No, even—even this is not correct. Wait, I don't even know what the [ __ ] I'm reading anymore. I'm sorry. Hold on. The declaration specifically referencing quoted a text chat thread in which obviously told her friend that she had just received a sexually explicit video of plaintiff from Banell. So that's not true. She says, "By the way, Destiny sends me sex tapes all the time, and he thinks I don't know the girls in them, but I have videos of him [ __ ] Cherry and Pixie, like Lympho. He just sent me another one. Has—haven't opened it. Let's see who he's [ __ ] this time." So this text that they're summarizing here doesn't even accurately summarize this number one. And then number two, her declaration doesn't even match her own text thread here because she says on or about November 3rd, I messaged a friend of mine and told him that Destiny had sent me the abovementioned sexually explicit video of himself and another woman and that I had recognized the woman as the streamer Pixie. I also told my friend that Destiny had sent me another video of him and another woman that I recognized as the streamer with a screen named Cherry. I was able to recognize Cherry just by her voice and the uh—since the video was a black screen with audio of other social interactions. I retained my—in my possession—to copy them. But that's not even really what she said here. She said that I had sent her tapes uh of Cherry and Pixie and that I sent her something different this time. So her own declaration doesn't really match her—the submitted text message here, the two messages that we see with no other context around it or anything else. I have no idea who these are—to what this is in reference to. And then their summary, their summary doesn't match their newly submitted evidence, nor does it even match her declaration. Okay, sorry. Anyway, this is [ __ ] [ __ ] but whatever. The evidence is not new, but rather evidence corroborating ABMC's declaration. The former screenshot blah blah. The evidence submitted before the June 3rd preliminary injection hearing in two and five. Bon could have subpoenaed Abby to testify at the hearing, but he did not, thereby waving any objective—or—I think we've tried to subpoena her, but we can't get a hold of her. Like the—they're not accepting service on her behalf, and we can't find her anywhere right now. So, okay. The evidence at issue is not new and was timely submitted. Defendant mischaracterizes

The corroborating evidence submitted as a new and untimely. In reality, the text message plaintiff seeks to submit was explicitly referenced in paragraph 7 of the declaration, but it wasn't explicitly referenced. There are no quotes. There is no quotation mark here for anything. This is a, at best, it's a summary of this message. It doesn't even match the content one to one of the message. And again, we're in a court case, so it's kind of important that you're being specific with your words. So whatever, which is filed on May 3rd, 2025, well before the evidentiary hearing held on June 3rd. The evidence is therefore not a belated submission, but rather documentation corroborating a declaration already in the record.

Courts routinely allow such corroborative exhibits, especially where they support previously submitted declarations and relate directly to evidentiary matters under review. Unlike in Butler versus Garland, plaintiff is not attempting to reopen the evidentiary record or offer post-hearing supplemental declarations. Instead, plaintiff merely filed corroborate. They keep calling it corroborating when it but whatever. Uh, material that reinforces previously submitted evidence already before the court. All filed prior to the hearing, the day before the hearing. Defendants' reliance on Butler's misplaced and said has no relevance here's declarations and cribbended prior to the hearing.

Ironically, on May 30th, defendant objected to ABMC's assertion in her declaration that the defendant sent her the video because she provided no support for this baseless contention and failed to attach any exhibits reflecting the alleged transmission of the video. In response, plaintiffs submitted the corroborating evidence of her text message. Why wasn't that included with the original filing? Number one, and number two, there's still nothing that has to do with uh transmitting any videos to her.

Defendant further argues that because plaintiff had notice of a jurisdictional challenge, the evidence had to have been presented at the hearing or else risk, risk waving the right to present such evidence. This, of course, is nonsensical because the court never said it would only consider evidence presented at the hearing. The briefs and supporting evidence submitted prior to the hearing are also part of the preliminary injunction record. Um, also neither of the cases defendants' connection contentions that the evidence is new or at least defendants' evidentiary objections lack merit. Um, defendant argues that the corroding text message is inadmissible hearsay and unauthenticated. However, such evidentiary objections are premature and misapplied in this context. The court may consider hearsay in preliminary injunction proceedings, particularly when it supports testimony already presented via declaration. Preliminary injunctions are customarily granted on the basis of procedures that are less formal in evidence, um, that is less complete than in a trial on the merits.

Well, um, all well-pleaded allegations in the moving party's complaint and uncontroverted affidavit filed in support of the preliminary injunction motion are taken as true. Uncontroverted, meaning we don't contest them. No. Isn't that what uncontroverted means here? Furthermore, in reviewing a preliminary injunction motion, a district court may rely on affidavit here materials which would not be admissible evidence for a permanent injunction if the evidence is appropriate given the character and objectives of the injunctive proceeding. Did the magister judge say anything in the hearing about the fact that Jane Doe submitted these exhibits on the day before the hearing? No, we brought it a couple of times, but they kind of stayed away from the um they they didn't really touch much on the ABMC stuff. The it's um, furthermore, in reviewing a preliminary injunction motion a district court may rely the exhibit is consistent with ABMC's declaration and includes metadata and contextual cues sufficient to support its probative value. The text message in November 3rd, 2023 directly corroborates paragraph 7 of the declaration the defendant transmitted a sexually explicit video of plaintiff to her. How does that cor the date corroborates that I sent them a video? In what world does every okay defendant's claim that this message lacks probative value is contradicted by his own recognition that it supports plaintiff's jurisdictional arguments under the Cardi statute.

Defendant has failed to provide to present any valid reason for the court to disregard or strike the declaration or the corroborating evidence. ABMC's decoration and the correcting text message are properly before the court for purposes of the preliminary injunction determination. ABMC's non-testimony at hearing does not warrant exclusion. Once again, defendant is litigating in bad faith by deliberately distorting facts. Defendant asserts that Abby failed to appear to testify at the hearing and that ABMC refused to appear or testify at the preliminary hearing. But defendant knows that neither he nor plaintiff requested ABMC to testify and there's no evidence to support his spurious assertion that ABMC refused or failed to appear. Defendant also deliberately attempts to mislead the court by stating plaintiff's counsel refused to accept service of a subpoena on her behalf. ABMC has thus far avoided personal service. Defendant did not provide any evidence in support of these spurious assertions, nor can he. This is because the referenced request was on May 15, 2025 for a subpoena to produce documents, not for ABMC to testify at the hearing. Moreover, plaintiff's counsel never refused to accept service. Instead, less than 24 hours later and before counsel could respond, defendant's counsel said he would proceed to serve himself. What? And then they what? Didn't respond to it? Defendant has not provided any evidence of attempts to serve ABMC. And there's certainly no evidence she's avoiding service. How do you have evidence that somebody's avoiding service? What? How do you even do that? Um, I don't think I can't like publish emails or whatever, but okay. Records of dates and times you attempted to serve. Oh, maybe this maybe if they use a service provider. I wish they might have. Maybe that'll show up in another filing. I guess plaintiff doesn't have no obligation to call every declarant as a witness for the hearing. And the record is clear. The defendant did not seek to call ABMC either. Defendant chose not to subpoena or depose ABMC in advance despite having notice of her identity and the substance of her declaration a full month prior to the hearing. The court's order scheduling the hearing did not state that all witnesses needed to testify in person or that the declarations and other evidence submitted would not be considered. That is true. She didn't need to be there. That is true. But you would imagine that you would want your solo witness that is holding your subject matter jurisdiction to be there. You would imagine that. But who knows? Who cares? Courts do not require personal testimony from every declarant where their written declarations putting evidence have been timely submitted. Technically, I don't even think I don't even know if either of us needed to be there. I think technically we both could have skipped it, but I don't know if anybody's required to be at that hearing. I'm just I'm not sure. I'm not 100% strong.

Although affidavits are ordinarily inadmissible at trial, they are fully admissible in preliminary injunction proceedings. Defendant's argument that uh he was denied the opportunity to cross-examine ABMC is baseless. Defendant had over a month's notice of ABMC's declaration and its contents, but failed to issue a subpoena, notice a deposition, or otherwise secure her attendance at the hearing. The corroborating evidence of the text message presented nothing um presented nothing not already in the declaration and thus does not change the fact that if a month's notice plaintiff was under no obligation to call every declarant and defendant's strategic choice not to compel ABMC's testimony constitutes a waiver of any objection to the court's consideration of her declaration or the corroborating text message. Did not object contemporaneously nor did he move to strike the declaration; his silence and inaction constitutes waiver of cannot remain passive and then claim unfairness when the record closes.

As a final matter, plaintiff notes that the defendant had not objected to that portion of the motion requesting that the unredacted version of the exhibit be filed under seal. The exhibit plaintiff seeks to submit is not new evidence, but it's corrective. Okay. Jesus Christ. uh, you kind of skip the last part. What does that mean? What does what mean? What last part? The last part was just a conclusion or summary of [ __ ]. Why is all this [ __ ] so slow to have anything happen? It's court. It takes a while. This is just a summary of everything that was said. Did you reach to subpoena her? Yeah, we've been trying to, but initially they said that they were representing her to sue me and then nothing came of that. And I think we requested um to do something through her lawyer, but then they said that they're no longer they don't represent her, so they can't accept or I don't know. I don't know if they said specifically they don't represent her. They said that they can't accept service on her behalf. And then um apparently we're trying to serve her, but we can't find anywhere to serve her for documents. Um, um, Destiny, chances of it getting unsealed. Uh, it should be unsealed. It should be. Um, we just have to wait for the judge to rule on it. I I my understanding is there's like no basis and no world where that actually happens where they where they would where the judge would allow a public hearing to retroactively be sealed. Like We have to fight for every hearing to be public. Um, I don't know. Who knows? Um, hold on. Oh, okay. If it still doesn't, you can't even talk about it from memory. Yeah, I can talk. I'm pretty sure I can talk about from my memory of what have happened. But I wanted to um it would just be nice to read the actual transcript. Do you have to wait until December for summary judgment? I think you can file summary judgment anytime you want in the discovery phase, but it's best to wait for most of the stuff to be in. So, okay. Um, what are the chances that anyone who talked on the situation takes down their video or at least addresses the new changes later on down the line? Um, it's probably super unlikely. I who knows? I don't even know how it'll because I think there's because some people are trying the narrative has shifted over and over and over again based on how [ __ ] plaintiff looks and now that they look super [ __ ] like every 10 IQ point drops there's like a new narrative and right now the narrative is just that if I win it's on a technicality or some people are even a lot of you guys are doing they're like oh well they both did something really wrong and it's like no or we just had an understanding that plaintiff is misrepresenting because she's basically ass pain that she got outed as [ __ ] streamers but who knows we'll see what is this? Daddy and next will have a beef that we for years a great Idubbbz. Ana, you you care about your influencer boxers. You care about them so much. Give this guy 10 grand. Give this guy 10 grand. That's what I got paid. That's what I got paid. No, I'm serious. I'm serious for training. could help you out. Ethan could help you out. There's a million people that can help you out, right, Dad? But the person that owes you money for all your time and all your troubles is literally Ana and Idubbbz. Give him 10 grand. Give him $10,000. He's been training for a year. He's went viral on Creator Clash one, Creator Clash 2. This guy has taken so much [ __ ] just because of your mistakes because he's the poster boy. He's the guy that goes viral, right? He's the guy that helped build Creator Clash and now he's over here suffering. Well, this is [ __ ]. Give him $10,000. I demand $10,000 for Nathan Barnett aka Dadbot. I demand it. I absolutely demand it. It's ridiculous. I don't want money that it's not I don't want people just give me money. Everyone did the same thing. I trained. I did my fight. I did promotion. I happened to go viral. It's not. I can't control. It's insane. We just need to make this content cop so bad even though it's going to completely [ __ ] you over. And then they're going to preach that they care so much about these influencers. You know what [ __ ] I got when they're telling people I don't care about wings or boogie [ __ ]. I gave them 10 grand. It is kind of crazy that this is like an Elon Musk tier situation where if you have stock in this company and you care about Tesla or SpaceX or whatever and then um and Elon is out here making crazy political statements, I imagine you would feel incredibly ass pain that he's [ __ ] ruining your portfolio. Much the same in New York. If you're a uh if you're like at creator clash and you're one of the fighters here and you've been giving up a lot of training for this whatever and then the organi the lead organizer and face of creator clash goes out and starts making insane political statements. I just don't know how you I would be so ass pained. Like what the [ __ ] is wrong with you? I would stay in New York City. My plans are to address New Yorkers across the five boroughs and focus on that. Mr. Wait, what? I would stay in New York City. My plans are to address New Yorkers across the five boroughs and focus on that. Mr. You got my vote. There it is. It's that simple. I don't agree with the socialist policies. I don't like the fact that he's like not speaking. Yeah, of course he's going to be aligned in this way. Meanwhile, Ana donated $1,000 to Casey Drone. Wait, really? We don't know this 100%, right? It could be somebody is donating under her name. That's a That would be a big troll though if true and then like a and I said earlier they used my dad's disability to trick him, but that was unrelated. It was just today we've been like calling on my dad's disability, you know, cuz I've been like working towards trying to get my dad on disability and we were like responding to some calls and notifications we got about that and then like a few minutes later the next thing I know my dad comes in and he's like [ __ ] crying. You know, it's really [ __ ] traumatic to see your dad cry like that. I started you all off with my own donation so you all know how important it is to me. Thanks in advance. Love you all and I appreciate all the happy work that was Oh, she did donate. What a disgusting [ __ ] loser. Lives with her parents on [ __ ] disability while smoking how much [ __ ] weed and then is crying as she gets served with a lawsuit. You know, like that's what really like has me like so freaked out is seeing like how emotional my dad got about it, you know? Like, and I know people are going to be [ __ ] making fun of me for this and like they're going to be posting like videos of me like crying and laughing at it and whatnot, you know? Like, I don't know. Like I'm sure like what you guys are watching right now, like every [ __ ] insult community that's been attacking me relentlessly for like the past 10 years is going to use it for YouTube clips because they literally make careers out of bullying women like me. And I'm just so [ __ ] tired. I'm just so [ __ ] tired of constantly being harassed by this [ __ ], you know? Like you love it though. She loves it. This is why the people that post on Kiwi Farms and Snark forms are anonymous. Most people aren't stupid enough to throw their name behind the unhinged and subhuman degenerate [ __ ] that you guys are constantly slinging at everybody. You deserve every horrible outcome of this uh court case or whatever. Like like you earned this so much. right here gloating and and happily, you know, goating people on and, you know, bouncing around with glee and talking about people's kids and making unhinged accusations against people online and saying unhinged crazy [ __ ] on your public Twitter all the time constantly. Like Jesus, for the past three or four months, I've really just been like, I just want to focus on myself and I want to focus on my community. I want to focus on being funny. I want to be one of those people who's just a breath of fresh air, you know? somebody who people can watch to escape and get away from it all. I just want to be focused on being funny and being giving and focus on, you know, the gays and the girls and the people who uplift me so much, you know, like we just got done doing like we just got done doing our trans lifeline fundraiser and [ __ ] and it just made me so happy, you know? Like I said, it's just been such a [ __ ] struggle and I'm just so [ __ ] tired of struggling and just the idea of having to like keep on struggling and it just be an ongoing thing for like the next several years of my life. It's just like I don't know if I can [ __ ] do this, you know? I'm just so [ __ ] tired and I'm so [ __ ] tired of just like, you know, like it's like you don't get a lot of support whenever you're attacked by these hateful incel communities. I mean, like, even outside of the [ __ ] that Ethan is doing to me, it's like it just makes every [ __ ] incel community that has hated me for years attack me once again. And it's like I felt like I was finally getting away from that kind of harassment. You know what I mean? And it's just like evoked like all of that all [ __ ] over again. And like I'm being attacked by like [ __ ] incel YouTubers that make content for incel men to make fun and laugh at women. Somebody said, "This is how Caseyron reacted to Asmin's mother's death." Yes, I did like that tweet. It says, "Thankfully XQC's lifestyle hasn't led directly to the death of one of his parents yet, so he has that going for him over Asmin at least." I'll admit I did like that tweet and I I have a lack of respect for Asmin Gold after letting his mom with COPD live in those sort of conditions. I'm sorry. Like you're a millionaire. You have all of the resources in the world. Why is your sick mother living like that? Like I'll say it. I don't care if that makes me a bad person. Still miles above Asmin Gold. Miles above Asmin Gold. I'm I wonder what her dad is on disability for. I wonder if that's impacted at all by the insanely dense bong clouds that are constantly gathering around Casey John's room. Sorry. Like I have literally a fraction of the income and I take better care of my parents than that and I don't have anywhere near close the resources that he going through traumatic things, you know, like I'm being attacked by like [ __ ] the quartering incel channels that I've never even [ __ ] heard of. the [ __ ] rape reviewer Nicholas D to Oreo or what the [ __ ] ever, you know, Asmin Gold's community, Tees community is now claiming that Teeone is going to sue me for defamation, you know? It's like I I have been through I have been through a lot, you know? Like I have been through a lot and I do think I'm a strong person, but somebody can only [ __ ] take so much. You know what I mean? somebody can only [ __ ] take so much. And I don't know, it's just very isolating to see like the people who do have like bigger voices to just like and I get that there's so many other things going on in the world. Uhoh. Oh [ __ ]. Uhoh. It's like they don't even have to [ __ ] talk about me. But god damn, [ __ ] talk about something. [ __ ] fence sitters. You know what I mean? Like talk about something like you know anything. Like pick pick something. Pick something. Like there's so many things to be fighting for right now. There's so many people to be fighting for right now. And there's just like so many big voices that remain silent and it's just frustrating. She's mad because Hassan ditched her and isn't shouting out any of the people. God, dude. Hassan, what is the opposite of the Midas touch? He's the guy who touches things and turns to gold. Well, I guess that's technically bad, too, but it's like he really It's like human shields. I guess it's kind of crazy. Hasan will like throw whole careers in front of him, watch them die on his altar, and then just moonwalk the [ __ ] away without a care in the world. I feel like he basically did it to Ian. And now these three, Denims, Caseyron, and Froggen. Casey Trron wasn't part of the uh content cop, was she? Okay. No, just the other two. And Hasan is just completely hanging these people out to dry. Based. Also though, I can respect it for Hasan. Now that my eyes have been open and I'm deep enough into the community, I understand you should probably just hang all these [ __ ] out to dry because they'll absolutely do the same to you given the opportunity. So, you know what? Player to player now. I respect it. I respect it. Except for Dan. Sorry, not.

Dan. You know, um, it's like, would they care if it happened to Pokemon? You know what I mean? It's just like I've been so [ __ ] isolated and I just feel like my whole Twitch career I've just been completely thrown to the [ __ ] wolves to just fend for myself over and over again. And it's just like, god damn, can I not [ __ ] catch a break? I am so [ __ ] tired of struggling.

Like I don't mean to, like I don't know, like like people are like, stop playing victim. Like this isn't a pity party for yourself. Like I have been through so much [ __ ] [ __ ], you know? And then just to see like the way people are spreading all of these lies about me and the fact that I can't even control my own [ __ ] narrative, you know? Like I—That's a big—She's a snarker. Kiwi poster reader. That's a huge thing. I love to use that. I—you can't control my narrative. M used to say that a lot too. Just to see like the way people are spreading all of these lies about me and the fact that I can't even control my own [ __ ] narrative, you know? Like I can't even control my own [ __ ] narrative. Like my voice isn't big enough to shout over all of the [ __ ] incels shouting lies about me right now.

You know, like all of these [ __ ] people that are like, "Well, Casey Tron should have money. She was famous 10 years ago, whenever she was the titty streamer." Like, yeah, whenever I was [ __ ] famous 10 years ago, whenever I went viral on Twitch, that was literally the worst time in my life because along with that, along with that and being attacked by incels, my mother was literally in an extremely abusive relationship at the time where I should have been able to focus on my streaming career whenever my Twitch was blowing up. I had to focus on the fact that there was an abusive man trying to [ __ ] kill my mother, you know? So, to all of the people that are like, "Well, how did she not have any [ __ ] money from whenever she was famous?" I don't know. It's because of the fact that whenever I was blowing up and going viral on Twitter, I had to hide that—I would literally have to fake disconnect from my my stream. I would have to fake disconnect to my stream to go and drive over to my mother's house because she called me and just [ __ ] left the phone on the table and I could hear a man [ __ ] hitting her.

People keep asking how she can have 4,000 subs without making much money. I think Twitch changed the sub stuff a long time ago such that you have no idea how much an actual sub gives you anymore. Like it used to be if you had 4,000 subs and you were like a premium partner, it would be 4,000 times $5 is 20,000 a month. But I remember at least at the end of like Molina's um when she was streaming, when she was here, then the subs had already changed such that like people from Turkey subbing, I think you would get like less than 90 cents for a sub. Like they changed it to a bunch of regional pricing and then they've reduced the cut. So I think you can get um like majorly [ __ ]—Like you can have like because I want—I want to say Molina was getting less than $1 a sub at the end. It was like insane how crazy the rates had been uh decayed or degraded or whatever.

You know, it's just like so tiresome just not having control of your own narrative and having people [ __ ] spread lies about you and make it sound like, "Oh, she's a piece of [ __ ]. Yeah, she did go viral, but nothing happened with it." You—you know, like just just like the level of just like [ __ ] astroturfing. What is this? An actual good post on Hassan subreet. Don't say we didn't warn you. The year is 2035. Sultan Mamani has outlawed American flags and arrested all but a few true patriots remaining in the city of New Baghdad. Gangs of crack-smoking gay and transcommunist dressed in Hunter Biden 2040 t-shirts roam the streets of Bushwick attacking landlords, enchanting death to America. On the former ground zero stands a mosque. Inside, toddlers are trained in woke ideology and critical race theory. Christianity is outlawed and the police have been replaced with anarchist Democrats armed with dildo bats. Anthony Fouch's secret police clashed with the only remaining resistance, an underground network of brave, former NYPD officers led by me. Who am I? My allies call me Q, but you may know me by my real name, Lindsey Graham. What? Wait, no, that should just be an ironic laugh. I need like an actual—I need an actual laugh for when things are actually funny. Holy [ __ ] This is one of my favorite um um [ __ ] what was the name of the show when he does the [ __ ]? He's not Borat. What—What was the name of his character for this? I bet if I just put Borat on. No, I won't be able to find it. Bro, this is America. Oh, did I put Muslim church? Oh, what's this? No, I don't want to [ __ ] short. No. What? Can you not buy this show anywhere? The—This is America show. Oh, wait. It's—Who is America? Oh, who is America? Who is America? Is—is there like a Showtime channel buy thing on—Oh, wait. Bye. Do I have Paramount Plus? Wait, never mind.

We have an epic Redditor here to save the day. Namaste. I'm a self-hating white male and my name is Naira Kane and Deachello. Two weeks after the election was stolen from President Hillary Clinton, I managed to get out of bed. I've been cycling through our fractured nation to try and heal the divide. Kingman, Arizona, once a bustling mining town and home of civil rights activist Timothy McVey, now a depressed habitat for voters clearly still mourning the tragedy of Hillary's election loss. What could be better to lift their spirits than news of an exciting new urban development that I decided to tell them about at a town hall meeting I called. Who wants to see huge economic growth here? Okay, first of all, I just want to say caution. Okay, things like mayonnaise and ketchup are still trash. Okay, so be careful. All right. I recently, a few months ago, discovered that hummus is actually incredibly awesome. All right. I had somebody make me homemade guacamole. This is so much better than the [ __ ] that they serve you at [ __ ] um—not Subway, at not Quudoba, at Chipotle. This is some good [ __ ]. Oh my god. I don't know what they gave you at Chipotle. I don't know if they just crush flavorless avocado and then just mash it in a bowl and give it to you, but what the [ __ ] Okay, everybody, right? Who wants to see an investment of $385 million? Guess what? You guys are going to get it. I'm here to tell you that Kingman has been chosen as the location of a brand new state-of-the-art mosque. What? I know some of you are thinking, okay, this is just another typical mosque. This guys is going to be the world's largest mosque outside of the Middle East. Just the word alone scares you. To me, when I hear the word mosque, I think of terrorism. Is there—is there a need for this in Kingman? Yes, there is. How? What? Your town will become a hub for tourism from for Muslims around the world. Can I get a whoop whoop? No. No. We don't want that [ __ ] here. You bring Muslim. We might have problem. We probably will have problems. We'll all be moving out of this state. Okay, let—let's before we make up our minds, let's take a closer look at this wonderful mosque. We made up our minds. The Imam Zed Wahhabi mosque of Kingman. You guys will have the choice between two different designs. This is the first design. This is design one and this is design two. So, who here supports design one? Nobody. Okay. So, you're all for design two? Neither. We don't want either one. Okay. So, let me tell you, sir. You don't like this construction? Tell me about your dream mosque. There is no—We don't want a mosque. Mosque. As soon as you said mosque, you ruined it. Where is the money coming from? It's not going to be paid for by you. It's primarily going to be paid for by the Saudi government. Of course, the Clinton Foundation is—That's a big [ __ ] mistake right there. You should have never brought that up. You know, around here, that's even worse than the—Listen, everybody. Can everybody be calm? This is not a big deal. This is just a building. It's a huge deal. It's a building. It's not a building. It's a [ __ ] terrorist mosque. But, okay, let me address terrorism. Rest assured, I share your concerns and we will do everything we can to protect these Muslims from it. The mosque will have fortified walls and there will be barricades to keep the Muslims safe inside. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Why would we want them safe inside when we don't even want them in our town? Well, it—it would be to protect the worshippers from any uh—violent—us that's causing the violence. It's them. Oh, no, no, no. Did you—I didn't imply anybody here is racist. Of course not. I am. I'm racist toward Muslims. Let me continue and then I—That would probably look good in a fire. Well, it will be made out of stone, so it won't be able to burn. So, that's one of the anti-terrorist measures. I really believe by the end of this uh presentation, you guys are going to be completely convinced. You're wrong. Let me show you how your town will change. [ __ ] kidding me, right? You change the name on that and I guarantee you're going to have a fight in your hands. Ain't a goddamn thing about that we like. Can we hear from some of the Muslims in this room? How do you feel about it, sir? Are you a Muslim? No, there's no Muslim. There's no Muslims here. Oh, there are no Muslims here at home. This town's lucky to have black people in it. Yeah, of course you're lucky to have black people. They add a lot to the society. Thank you, sir. Finally, somebody who appreciates multiculturalism. Sir, you are completely right. The benefit of having African-Americans means a more diverse—Thank you, sir. Don't be ashamed. Saying there's black people in Kingman that aren't welcome there either, but we tolerate them. Okay. One thing I do in Bend, Oregon is sometimes when there's an atmosphere of tension, which there is here, I use music to alleviate the tension. There is a wonderful song that I use that relaxes people and it's from the Wasa tribe in South Africa. It goes like this. Ain't nothing calming about that. When I am—pardon me, where are you going? You are triggered and you are feeling some anger. You're pulling the trigger harder now. We don't want to hear that [ __ ]. You really think this is calming us? This will calm if you call. It's not calling us. It's pissing us off. Close your eyes. I understand exactly why there was told no weapons here. Why is that, sir? Because you come down here and open your mouth and say this kind of [ __ ] in front of us Arizona, somebody's going to get hurt. Well, I'm going to write that down. This is scripted, right? My understanding is none of this was scripted because they got actual—they got—didn't they get an actual—is it a congressman who is America gun commercial—they got some dude and they pretended that he was like a mad guy. My name—Wait, no. This guy didn't do the commercials. Hold on. This guy did the commercials. It was this one. Why'd you tell me to click away? [ __ ] you. No, the second video is good, too. This one is also good, though. Yeah. What a blast. [ __ ] you. Stop interrupting me. Sheet say my name Colonel Iran Murad. I am the terrorist terminator. In America there is big problem of shootings in schools. The N want to arm the teachers. This is crazy. They should be arming the children. Yala. Let go. To get deadly weapons into the hands of America's school children, I needed the help of gun rights hero Philip Van Cleave. My next guest is a gun rights advocate who says the Bushmaster semiotic rifle, the type of rifle that Adam Lanza used to kill 20 children and six more adults, is quote, "A blast to shoot with." Guns are fun. Some of them are much more cool than others. Are you proud of what you said? It's just a fact. In America, there have been a lot of shootings in the school and in the university. What do the liberals say is the reason for this and the solution? Well, they blame it on guns. Yeah. It's crazy because they blame it on the guns. Yes. Yes. Why does he sit like that? Yes. We start a program in Israel for kinder guardians. Okay. We train them from the age 16 down to the age three. Yeah. Well, I—I think it would be a—a good idea. We—we've been pushing something along this line for years, but really haven't gotten any traction with it. We were thinking seventh or eighth grade. You're talking much younger than that. My son was in the very first program. May he rest in peace. Uh—he died doing what I love. Yeah. They haven't quite developed u—what we call conscience where you—you—you feel guilty about doing something wrong. That's developing that you're learning right and wrong. If they don't—haven't developed that yet, they could be very effective soldiers. This year in our state government, they had a bill put in that would have made it illegal for someone four years old to 12 years old to have access to a gun. Uh oh. We—we killed—we—we killed the bill. They tried to stop four-year-old children from having access to guns. Yes. Yes. What is the logic that these people come up with? They just think that children uh—can't handle them. We want three-year-olds who are real experts at what they're doing, not three-year-olds who are reckless. Yeah. And we don't teach two-year-olds because they call it the terrible twos for a reason. There's a reason. Yes. So, I would like you to help me do instructional video for three-year-olds. Okay. Shalom, children. My name Iran Morad. I here to show you that guns when used responsibly with training from grown-ups can help keep you safe in your school. Here to help teach you is Philip Van. Also, I'm sorry. I'm trying to do—Do Israelis speak like this where every gro—grown-ups or is he just like—do—is he just like a [ __ ] meme? Do Israelis make that sound around the R noise or is this—Yes sometimes? Yes sometimes. Okay. Oh, maybe I just—maybe I guess most of the ones I listen to have a better English accent. But Cle—not every strange man you meet going to be friendly and non-threatening like me. Today, we're going to teach you how you can stop these naughty men and have them take a long nap. That's right. And that's why you're going to meet a friend of mine. His name is Puppy Pistol. Now, Philip, will you show us how to feed Puppy Pistol? To feed him, take his lunchbox and push it into his tummy like this. Just remember to point Puppy Pistol's mouth right at the middle of the bad man. If he has a big fat tummy, point at that. Great. It's fun. Okay. Puppy Pistol is part of a old group of new friends that your parents can get you called Gunnimals. Wouldn't you love to meet this little gny rabbit? He's ready to put the naughty man on a very long time out. How about a magical uziorn? Well, this is one for the girls. It's a lovely little unicorn that you can play with. Dino Gun can stop an entire crowd of bad men. And tots. You got to learn that Dino Gun eats and spits his candy really, really fast. Rocket Chip RPG will take you to the moon. Or rather, the bad guys are going to the moon if they attack your school with a truck full of big scary fireworks. And introducing—Is your guy serious or is he part of the skit? No, he's serious. This is a guy, a gun rights advocate, I guess, in Virginia. And he and um—the skit obviously on behalf of Sarah Sasha Baron Cohen, he's joking, but it's just like how ridiculous can you get these guys to buy into [ __ ]—It just BFF—a start a gun for infants 24 months and under. BFF is so easy to fire even a baby can use it. BFF wants to help you pull the string on a bad guy. Make bang bang. Aim at the head, shoulders, not the toes, not the toes. Fire. Head, shoulders, not the toes, not the toes. Fire. Eyes, ears, and belly and nose. Head, shoulders, not the toes. Not the tongue. Oh my god, this one. Modern technology is at the forefront of the fight against terror. One time I killed a suicide bomber with an iPad Pro, but luckily I had bought Apple Care. I'm going now to meet a respected politician to showcase the latest Israeli gadget. I'm sitting with Roy Eie Moore. Alabama Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore is facing accusations of sexual misconduct. Four women. A total of nine women have now come forward. One accuser says that Moore initiated a sexual encounter when she was just 14 years old. Get out and vote for Roy Moore. Do it. Do it. It really is an honor. Shalom. Shalom. Very—very uh—nice to meet you. Well, thank you very much. I'm very honored. Why Alabama have this strong connection with Israel? It's just—Alabama has always been a state that valued freedom, valued liberty, of course, and appreciated what people went through to get it. And I think that uh—Alabama has always been a place for equality. It has. And we've—we've uh—celebrated throughout our history things like this in Alabama—people have always been free whatever the religion or race or sexuality. It's part of our heritage—of course—you know—so the difference in Israel and many people ask why are we have so many technological innovation because in the army there is a unit just for technological innovation. The army has always been about technology. We're all very proud of the new anti-tunnel tech system. So I don't know if you are aware we had two wars with Gaza and in the last one Hamas were building tunnels and using them to infiltrate and launch terror attacks. We have developed seismic waves that can detect where the tunnel is. Hamas are very upset about this but it has been very exciting since it has been started. We have detected three tunnels each of which would be used for terrorist attack. They have now used this technology to identify other abnormalities. It turns out the sex offenders and particularly pedophiles secrete an enzyme for DDHT which is actually detectable. It is three times the level of non-perverts. So the phrase sweating like a rapist is actually based on science. So in Israel they have developed a machine that is used in schools and playgrounds to detect anyone coming in. And if uh—they detect the pedophile, the wand alerts the law enforcement and the schools within a 100 mile radius. Uh—it is very—very uh—simple to use. You just switch it on and because uh—neither of us or sex offenders then it make absolutely nothing. You just put it on. You put it nearby. Wait. This is obviously a problem. Hold on. Hold on. It must be faulty. It's malfunctioning. I'm sure it will do the same with the other guy here. Let me just—Uh, sorry. Is this your jacket? Yes. Uh—did you lend the jacket to somebody else? Maybe. No, I've been married for 33. Sure. And never had an accusation of such things. I am not accusing you at all. This is—Well, then if this is an instrument I—that certainly I'm not a pedophile. Okay. No, but the machine is—Well, I don't know. Then maybe Israeli technology hasn't developed properly. This is 99.8%. It is not saying that you are a pedophile. Of course not. I am simply cutting this conversation right now. No. Have you been nice? I support Israel. I don't support this kind of stuff. Thank you. No, I—it is—I'm not saying that you're a sex offender at all.

You know, and then like not only that, but it's like I can't even have my [ __ ] humor, you know? I can't even have my [ __ ] humor. Like one thing about people who have been through a lot of [ __ ], the way you get through it is you have a sense of humor. Lawyer here. There's no way he would legally be able to use something like this. Unpronounced—unpronounced. Um, if I had to guess, and I could be totally wrong. If I had to guess, stuff that's done under like parody or whatever [ __ ] you probably have a

Pretty wide difference. Um, or there's a wide difference given to you when it comes to stuff like that; that would be my guess. Especially when it comes to like political stuff, for like freedom of speech, First Amendment things.

I heard he got sued a lot for his first and second movies, but I mean, actually, hold on. I'm sorry. Never mind. I don't even know why I just argued that. Um, what are you—are you suggesting that Roy Moore agreed to do this skit? I mean, there is no world—there is no world where he willingly agreed and developed to do this, so right you have—oh, wait, sorry, hold on, we got more posts by our good friend Donald Trump.

Breaking news: I was shocked to hear that the state of Israel, which has just won—which is—which has just had one of its greatest moments in history and is strongly led by Bibi Netanyahu, is continuing its ridiculous witch hunt against their great wartime prime minister, Jesus. Bibi and I just went through hell together fighting a very tough and brilliant longtime enemy of Israel, Iran. And Bibi of Israel, Iran, and Bibi could not have been better, sharper, or stronger in his love for the incredible Holy Land. It was like two weeks of some bombing runs, okay? Anybody else would have suffered losses, embarrassment, and chaos. Bibi Netanyahu was a warrior like perhaps no other warrior in the history of Israel. And the result was something that nobody thought was possible: a complete elimination of potentially one of the biggest and most powerful nuclear weapons anywhere in the world. And it was going to happen soon. We were fighting literally for the survival of Israel. I love how he capitalizes random words like he's got schizophrenia. And there is nobody in Israel's history that fought harder or more competently than Bibi Netanyahu.

Despite all of this, I just learned that Bibi has been summoned to court on Monday for the continuation of this long-running—he has been going through this horror show since May of 2020. Unheard of. This is the first time a sitting Israeli prime minister has ever been on trial. Yeah, because MERT, I think, resigned when he got charged. But a politically motivated case concerning cigars, a Bugs Bunny doll, and numerous other unfair charges in order to do him great harm. Such a witch hunt for a man who has given so much is unthinkable to me. He deserves much better than this, and so does the state of Israel. Bibi Netanyahu's trial should be cancelled immediately. Or a pardon given to a great hero who has done so much for the state. Perhaps there is no one that I know who could have worked in better harmony with the president of the United States, me, than Bibi Netanyahu. It was the United States of America that saved Israel, and now it is going to be the United States of America that saved Bibi Netanyahu. This travesty of justice cannot be allowed. Jesus Christ. What's he in trial for? Um, I would have to go back and look it up. I feel like when I read up on the MERT stuff, I feel like it was weak. I feel like when I read up on the Netanyahu stuff, I feel like it was a lot worse.

Did Netanyahu used to be the mayor of Jerusalem, or was that Mer? That was Mer, right? Yes. I asked either or. Who? Which one was it? [ __ ] you guys. Okay, Mer's trial was for—he accepted something—building permits or something that he shouldn't have done, I think, when he was the mayor of Jerusalem, but it seemed kind of like meh. But I feel like when I looked at the Benjamin Netanyahu stuff, it seemed significantly worse. Like it was not good. But I'd have to go back and dig through. I don't remember that specifically.

Mango is like an alcoholic. Mango can drink 30 beers and act the same as he does off no beers. He's a machine of a man. He said he had seven beers already today. If you ask him how many beers he's had lifetime, he—it's probably above 10,000. He's the champ. He's a two-time champion. He's never lost. We got a new PP, guys. Mango just blew a 0.25. Mango just blew. That is my go. Hey everybody, Mango just blew a .32. That's going to be clear. That is dangerous. That's not good. That's not good. That's dangerous. Let's up those numbers. [ __ ] Everybody get your second race ready to go. Wait. Sorry. Sorry. Sorry. I—I thought you were Mango. I got—Oh, [ __ ] me. You just [ __ ] me from behind. Get off me. Oh my god. He's rushed so nicely. What is the actual like alcohol poisoning level? Hold on. What BAC is considered alcohol poisoning? When excessive alcohol consumption raises BAC from point 3% to dangerously high levels when they exceed 3% with fatal cases often reaching point 4% or higher. Damn. And he was blowing a point—was it over .3? We got a new PP, guys. Mango just blew a 0.25. Mango just blew. Now, to be fair, this is like a personal breathalyzer. It might be blowing like right after drinking or something, so maybe it's higher than it actually is. But um, I can't speak to—I don't know if Leffen knows that uh Mango actually has like a problem with alcohol. I don't know if Leffen knows it at this point. I feel like, as much as I—I hate Leffen's brown-nosing on everything, I feel like Leffen is not the type of person to knowingly encourage somebody's self-destructive behavior if he genuinely thinks it's a problem. My guess is he probably didn't know. Literally, everyone knows. Everyone in the Melee scene knows. Leffen has to know. Yeah, but like, oh [ __ ] never mind. I actually totally forgot about that. Leffen comes from Melee, doesn't he? Because people in the Melee scene absolutely know. Um, I know that people in MEC know. So, I know that Leffen knows that people know Leffen. Oh, [ __ ] Never mind. Um, okay, never mind. [ __ ] I was going to try to do a good faith defense of Leffen here. That's pretty shitty. That's pretty irresponsible, I think. Um, they've talked about it on their podcast. It's bad. They've had multiple stories about it. Well, he addressed it in his video. His response was that he personally asked Mango if he's an alcoholic and was told no. Oh, well, if he personally asked him and he said no, then I will be salty as [ __ ] this year. I don't give a [ __ ] Never mind. Actually, I 180 completely change every single thing I just said. I just think it's funny that I need a—I need a clip of the cuntiest woman ever saying that. I just think it's funny that I need that voice clip. Every single word I say to somebody, every DM I have with somebody, everything I cover on stream, every opinion I give, all of it is like manipulative, evil, can be construed or misconstrued in the most insane ways possible. Like, oh, when Destiny said, "I hope you're okay," he was just reaching out to try to get this person to feel a way so they can manipulate them and blah blah blah blah blah. If there was anything even remotely similar to me being next to some dude who was sexually harassing women at a party who subsequently got banned from his pro gaming team and from Twitch and you had a video of me saying, "Let's go 32. Let's go. Keep drinking," and there were multiple videos of me talking about how this guy had a drinking problem and everybody I see knew about it, I would be getting excoriated for this. I would be getting dragged so [ __ ] hard for this, but whatever. Damn. Who are these people? Oh, hold on. I just had a psychic moment. So, the dude is being egged on to drink more and more for hours. They're tracking his BA levels, so they know he's getting more and more intoxicated. Then, he humps a pillow or something and his career is over. Am I missing something? Did—Let me guess. Let me just take a guess. Shot in the dark. I could be totally off because I don't know how big the Melee community is on Reddit, but shot in the dark, did Asmongold come out and defend Mango? Oh, we're getting nose. Where are the people defending Mango coming from then? Yeah, I saw apparently he got banned from Twitch. Who knows for how long? That might be a big perma. No, it's the MizKids. They're still mad about the initial drama video Leffen made years back. The Melee community commits the wrong kind of grooming. So, it's an understandable mixup. Well, don't they do the—they do the kids spluns, too, right?

So, if you guys don't know, there's a bunch of clips yesterday of Mango going around humping people. And I know this cuz I—I saw them all this morning and I also—I think was getting humped a lot myself. Now, I'm going to say I don't mind when Mango humps me cuz I know Mango. It was super weird. If you watch any of the clips when he was humping people he doesn't know very well. And yeah, I feel like "menace" is like a cutesy term that we use with Mango and it's like uh—it's like nah, that's just harassment, bro. Can't you—can't be cutesy about it. And so like, look, man, I—if you guys ever listen to me after an event, I'm pretty consistent. I always say my main goal at any event is that the people who are participating have a good time. Like that is like number one, the most important factor which in terms of good events: People who show up have a good time. That's why Mango is one of the goats in Melee. He's got enough fans to defend the f out of him online. Now I don't have a ton of direct interaction with the Melee community. However, my understanding is that while Mango is seen as one of the goats in the community for sure. Okay. Now he plays Fox. So how hard is that really? Okay. But the issue is everybody knows that he's a little bit autistic and I think he's got like a history of kind of weirdo sometimes like doing stuff like—I think everybody—Oh, he plays Falcon now. Sorry. [ __ ] I don't know anything about actual gameplay. [ __ ] you. Um, I think like he has that reputation of being like mega autistic and kind of like doing weird [ __ ] or whatever in the past, right? I think doesn't everybody know that he—same character? Oh, Fox and Falco. Oh, cuz Falco is a fox. Care, is he? Wait, Falco. That ain't Falco. See what I did there? That's not even the right one. But—and uh—and I dropped the ball yesterday. I mean, to be real, I dropped the ball cuz not only did people not have a good time, some people had like an explicit—Oh, he's Falcon. It's in the name. Who's Fox then? Who's Falco? Oh, Fox is Star Fox. Who's Falco? Wait, Falco Melee. He is a clone of Fox. Was he in one of the Star Fox games? Falco is this wingman. I thought the wingman was like a bunny and then a brown thing. Wait. First mission. Star Fox 64. Holy [ __ ] It's been like almost—to the point where I say it's almost been 30 years since I've played this game. A few years. Oh yeah. Peppy. That guy. And then the frog guy. Slippy. And isn't there a girl pilot or am I making that up? Oh, is Slippy the girl—the frog? What mission does Falco show? Did I ever beat this game? I must have beaten this game. This might have been in my Blockbuster era, so I only rented it. Maybe I must have beaten this game, right? Star Fox. This one—the one you could get a rumble pack, right? And your controller would vibrate. Okay. Sorry. Bad time. Like they're uncomfortable, wanted to leave early, needed to leave early, uh, cuz they're just feeling uncomfortable, you know? And that's like ultimately my—my uh—my fault, right? That's on me. That's my event. That's my job to do that. So—so I feel really bad about that. And wait, Connor, I think is—Connor—I think is trying to—let's be real, right? I mean, I wonder how he would respond if Asmongold or some other streamer he dislikes was doing the same thing. He'd be tweeting about it, talking about how bad they are, etc. True. You have to remember the Smash community is full of [ __ ] vile people, abusers, pedophiles, groomers, etc. Like, it's arguably one of the worst communities, and we saw them get exposed massively a few years back, but the fans have to have a hard-on for Smash Stars. They will ride or die. They're players. It's disgusting. Okay, two things. One, it's the Smash community, okay? It's not like they have a—it's not like they have a reservoir of new players to draw from, okay? Okay. So, they got to work with what they have. And two, let's be real now, I don't want to be the one to say it, but PC gamers have told you guys for decades that you guys—console players—are degenerates. And that was kind of known. So, you know, just saying. Just saying. Okay. Just saying. Just saying. Mitch McConnell was originally willing to work with Barack Obama, and then he got sick. He broke his ankle, spent two months in bed in an Xbox COD lobby. And after that experience, he came out. He said he was going to make Obama a one-term president. Now, I'm not saying it's because of what goes on in those games. I'm just saying we've all known that console players are a bit degenerate. All right. Uh, the—the entire like—that entire like friend group of people, I think, is extremely fake and uh, they have no problem sweeping bad accusations or bad behavior from people that are part of their group or part of, you know, like the right group of people—um, you know, like sweeping those under the rug, but the moment that somebody who they dislike does something, somehow now it's time to pull out all the pitchforks—he's justifying the behavior. I feel bad—move. I think that he kind of is. Yeah. Uh, and—and I think that also he is trying to play both sides where like he looks like he is, but he's not at the same time. Connor, I think, is trying to—there's dumb here. Of course they're boys. They'd laugh it off if—if you're doing this, but if they're not his friends, they'd be women. Yeah. Yeah. Definitely. Partly justifying it, mostly—but if they're not as friends, they'd be women. Wait, what? Woman. Yeah. Yeah. Definitely. I laugh it off if—if you're doing this, but if they're not as friends, they'd be women. Yeah. Yeah. Definitely partly justifying it, mostly trying to brush it over to the rug. It's not a big deal. Yeah, it's just—it's just weird, especially from somebody who—like, I mean, again, Connor is like one of the biggest virtue signalers on Twitter, right? Always trying to have the right opinion. So—uh, true. Apparently, I guess he misjudged uh what people—I stand with the cockroach today. True. The worm I slithered alongside the cockroaches want him to say and uh, sad to see, but not a surprise. Absolutely true. And uh, you know, I reached out to anyone who I felt might have felt uncomfortable and talked to them. But also, and I already told Mango this, I'm no longer inviting Mango to MoistCr1TiKaL's event cuz like, you know, it's a privilege to go to an event. Holy [ __ ] I don't want to give the MizKids any ideas cuz I don't think anybody deserves this—as a potential current victim myself. But uh, it would be funny to see them run with that. Remember what Mizk got tanked for? You sent somebody ahead to talk to potential victims. Also, and I already told Mango this, I'm no longer inviting Mango to Moist and he's like, I reached out and I talked to all the potential kid. So, I feel really bad about that and uh, you know, I reached out to anyone who I felt might have felt uncomfortable and talked to them, but also and I already told Mango this and no longer inviting Mango to Moist's event cuz like you know, it's a privilege to go to an event, man. Like the whole point of an event is like it's a fun thing to do, have a good ass time, and if somebody appearing jeopardizes somebody else having a good time, that just can't be a thing. Now, I see a lot of dialogue on like broader implications. I have like—I'm only worried about my team, my vet. I'm restarting my—Oh, I'm going to restart the kickstream. Uh, cuz I got to start anything else soon. Jesus. [ __ ] Clarify. He's still good with—not Sarite. Yeah, we're fine. Why did it clarify that? I don't think I've ever said otherwise. Um, the [ __ ] was that noise? Oh no. Okay. All right. Stopping my text stream. Let me restart that in a sec. You know what I'm saying? Like I don't speak the Melee community. I'm not like—like championing any other action. I'm—I'm just taking the action I can't take. You know what I'm saying? Any action I can take is the events I control. So for my events, that's—that's the game plan. I talked to Mango and for what it's worth, he was very uh—like accountable. He was like, "I get it. You know, whatever you got to do, I—I, you know, deserve it really." So—so he gets it. Uh, which is good cuz it's definitely not a fun conversation to have. Especially hungover—is [ __ ] thrown up. But—but it's also important to do it and important to do it quickly today cuz like I don't want this to impact Master Baker. Like I don't want to be at Master Baker and it'd be awkward or weird. Uh, now, you know, luckily I talked to everyone. Everyone seems good. Uh [ __ ] Okay, last name and then I go downstairs. What was this? Did we watch this already? Man, get out of here. You're ridiculous. You just don't get it. No. Well, hey, I mean, at least we can agree that The Last Jedi is the best Star Wars. Okay, sure. That's just like how Jared Leto's Joker was actually peak. Super good. Yeah. No, I could see that cuz for me, LeBron, he's just not even top 10. Fair point. Cuz also like Japan, it's just not that cool. No, man. I think Japan's cool. I mean, yeah. No, it's not actually. Whole place is fake and overrated. Right. Right. Just like Halo 3. No, man. Okay. Leave the Chief out of this. I mean, yeah, that whole story arc was pretty derivative and stupid. So happy you're not offended. That's the thing with ribeyes, too. They should only be served well-done. Yes. And the best part of ketchup is that first watery sploop. Sure. Sure. But let's get real, though, cuz Anya Taylor-Joy is a soft five. That's valid. She's mid. And Radiohead isn't really that good. And busting up is like eating artichokes. It's a lot of prep, but for a little pleasure. Agreed. Just like how $5 is a very reasonable and fair price for a McChicken. Yeah. And like how Golden Retrievers are actually kind of mischievous and Hellcats aren't that fast. They're just—laugh. Season 8 of Game of Thrones aged really well. Every country should get a few nukes. That way everyone's scared to use them. Okay, that's just a fair take. Yeah, that one checks out. Same time next week? Sure. Little kissy kiss at the end? Always. Okay. All right. I love you guys. We're going upstairs. See you in a minute or two. Be careful. Heat. Heat. See you come but you never know my life. Yes. Can't give it up and I get it always. But I bet it won't change no more. That's a boring life. Is it? You can't get enough. Can't get enough. Heat. Heat. Heat. Heat. Get enough time with you. Thank you for joining us. We're live fresh every Wednesday night 7:00 p.m. EST on the dot bringing you the latest and freshest news. I see what you did there. They don't know what you're doing right there. I know what you're doing. That's fine. Honestly, I don't—you know, you can just uh—it's a very indirect passive-aggressive way. It was passive-aggressive. No, it's fine. It's fine. I uh—I was just doing a formal introduction. I got a new haircut, so I thought I would—Okay. You know, bring us in to a formal show. Am I not allowed to do that? No, you are. It is. It is true that we do this show on Wednesdays once a week. Oh, you think I was responding to the floating—Oh, no. That was not a response to that. Okay. Oh, I can't do anything without being accused. Sorry. That's all good. There's a Discord server you'd love to hang out in. Actually, they accuse me of doing crazy unh[ __ ] I'm in all those ones—all—I participate in a lot of those conversations that way. Wait, what? What am I waiting for? Nothing. Well, you said wait. Very like something was going to happen very quickly. Where am I? Is my stream still live upstairs? Um, should I go to youtube.com/Destiny? Hang out. And actually, they accuse me of doing—

Oh, we're on YouTube as well.

Does this computer? Did we go live to YouTube?

Oh my god, look how good I look on YouTube.

Get Our Mobile App

ZORDON WINNER OF NYC PRIMARIES | Covering wacky court transcripts | Anything Else tonight

Transcription