Transcription
Okay, good morning. So, welcome to the first class of the second semester. This semester, we are going to build on what we've learned the first semester, um, to better understand human history and to better understand what's happening in the world today, and also to be able to predict the future.
Okay, so if you have been following current events, and I hope you have, there are now three major conflicts in the world. The first and most devastating is the war in the Ukraine, where Russia and Ukraine have been in conflict, uh, for about three years now, and a lot of people have died. Um, there's controversy over the exact number, but, um, it's possible that over a million soldiers have died in this war so far. And even though President Donald Trump, the United States, has shown signs that he wants to end the war, we don't really know when the war will end.
Okay, so this war in in Ukraine, it is still happening, and it's affecting everything and everyone because, um, obviously, it brings a lot of instability and uncertainty in the world. It's also driving up prices and it's making things inconvenient. So when you fly the United States, you'll discover that it takes you longer to fly the United States because you can't fly through Russia. You have to fly around Russia.
Okay, so that's the first major conflict. The second conflict, um, which is not as deadly, but but which will probably prove to be even more dangerous, is the war in the Middle East. The conflict in the Middle East, um, as you know, um, for the past couple years, Israel has been in conflict with basically most of its neighbors. It's launched an expedition into the Gaza Strip against Hamas for what Hamas did on October 7th. Um, it's launched war, a war against Lebanon, it's involved in Syria, and the signs tell us that this conflict will spread. Trump has come in and promised, um, a resolution to the conflict, but as I will show you this semester, there are historical structural forces that make this conflict possibly the beginning of World War II. This conflict will only increase. The great fear right now is Israel attacks Iran and drives the United States into war with Iran, and this will mark the beginning of World War II. And this could possibly lead to the end of the world as we know it today. If the United States attacks Iran, both Russia and China must intervene in some capacity. Does that make sense to you guys?
Iran right now, it's the linchpin of the global economy. The first reason is there's a lot of oil in Iran, in the Middle East, and China, South Korea, and Japan get most of its oil from the Middle East. Right? So if you, if the oil supply is cut off, then the Chinese economy, the South Korean economy, the Japanese economy, basically all of East Asia faces economic collapse and catastrophe. Okay? But second is, if you look at a map, Iran is really the center of the world, meaning most of the world's trade goes through that area, especially something called the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has the capacity, uh, to cut off all trade in the Strait of Hormuz, and that would be catastrophe for the global economy. And if that would have happened, then the Western powers would need to get involved in order to free up the Strait of Hormuz, and then Russia, India, China, who knows? Okay, but a lot of people would have have to get involved in order to protect their economic interests.
All right, so, um, I will go the semester, I will go into the semester. We'll talk a lot about what's driving conflict in the Middle East. There are these geopolitical factors, as I, as I discussed, but there are also these religious factors that we looked into a bit, um, last semester, but I will explain more this semester.
Okay, and then the third and final conflict, um, is basically the United States against the world. What I mean by that is that, um, ever since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1991, we have been living in something called a unipolar moment, meaning there's only one superpower. And as such, the United States has been able to dictate policy, especially economic policy, around the world. United States controls all trade. We have to use the US dollar in order to trade. The United States also uses its military to protect shipping lanes, and this is called the Pax Americana, the American peace, and this, of course, has brought tremendous prosperity to the world. Okay? China would not have grown as fast as China did without the Pax Americana. It is American ships, American warships that allow Chinese ships to sail safely around the world, to deliver goods around the world.
But this unipolar movement has also created a lot of conflict. The main conflict being the United States can invade any country for no reason. 2003, it invaded Iraq for no reason. It destroyed Libya for no reason. It almost destroyed Syria for no reason. Okay? So the number of countries the United States has gone and destroyed are just staggering. So, and that's why Russia, under Putin, because it felt being, it felt bullied, it felt disrespected, that's why Russia is now in conflict with the United States. And strangely enough, this conflict has caused the United States to go into conflict with the rest of the world.
Okay, so as you may know, the United States right now, under Trump, has declared or is about to launch trade wars against a lot of countries: Canada, Mexico, quite possibly very quickly, the European Union. And the United States is already at economic war with Russia and China.
Okay, so we will go in this. We will also discuss this this semester. Why this is happening? Again, my argument to you is that if you know enough history, if you study the historical structural forces that drive, um, global conflict, then you'll understand what's going on, and you'll also be able to predict what will happen. Okay? Does that make sense?
Okay, so, um, what I want to talk today is about a new model of of historical analysis. How can we understand the movement of history? Why do people do what they do? Why do nations go to war? Why do nations have peace? Okay? So I'm looking at grand history. I'm looking at the, uh, large structural movement of history. And in the past, there have been two main models for understanding historical development.
Okay, so the first is the idea of a cycle or a circle. And this makes sense, right? Because this mirrors what we experience in life. When we, we are born, but then we die, and then other people are born, and then they die. Okay? So it's a cycle. You look at the seasons. There's, um, winter, but it gives rise to spring, which then gives rise to summer, then the fall, then winter again. It's a cycle. Okay? So for most of human history, most people have understood the movement of the world as a cycle. This is certainly true in Chinese history, right? Um, dynasties rise because because they have the Mandate of Heaven. Heaven favors some, and they do justice when they first arise. But over time, for for a variety of reasons, because of corruption, because it's a, there's a bad emperor, they lose the Mandate of Heaven, which allows a rebellion, which then creates a new dynasty. So, so Chinese history is almost a continuous cycle of dynastic rise and decline.
Now, in the, in the Western context, there's also a cycle. There are many different cycles, but let me explain one cycle that we've noticed in the Greek and Roman world. The cycle is this: there are three major factions in a society. There is the people, there is nobility, and then there is the king or a great person. Okay? And each of these factions have a particular strength. The people, their strength comes from their numbers, right? They have mass. The nobility, it's only a minority of people, but they have authority. They are respected because they know, uh, more, they have, they are better at war than ordinary people, but they have authority. People respect them. And the king has the army. Okay? So these are the three major forces or factions in a society, and these three factions are always in conflict. And what happens is a changing alliance where two of the three get together to beat one. And then this forces a new alliance, right? So what happens is this: you first have something called anarchy, where the nobility is in charge, and everyone has to do what they do, what they command. Okay? But over time, this anarchy becomes corrupt. And the way, and the way they become corrupt is by exploiting the people through debt. All right? So in a nobility, the nobles own the land. You have to work the land, but you get a share, and that's fine. But sometimes the weather is bad, so you can't work the land, you can't pay me the rent, so I give you a loan. And over time, this loan becomes a debt. And at at a certain point, you can't pay off the debt. So what happens? You become my slave, and your children become my slave as well. Okay? So this creates a lot of conflict in society. How is this conflict resolved? Because one of the nobility wants to be king, and he, and he sees an opportunity in the civil conflict between the people and the nobility. Okay? So he tells the people, if you make me king, I will clear your debts. And this creates a monarchy. And the first king is usually a good king because he had to work hard to obtain his position, and, um, people love him for the fact that he cleared away their debts. This, this is what we call a Jubilee, by the way. The word is Jubilee, and this happens a lot in human history. But the problem is, the king has a son who's not so good, and then the son has a son who's awful. Okay? And so the nobility get angry, the people get angry, and they rebel and they create a democracy. Okay? But then in the democracy, because what happens in the democracy is it's the best people, or the best speakers, the wealthiest people who control the votes, and so they get together, and what do they do? They, and what do they do? They create anarchy. You see how the cycle works? And the cycle goes on and on and on. These, um, three factions always in conflict with each other, and their, and their way they form their alliances creates a certain form of government. Okay? When the nobility is in charge, it's anarchy. When but then a king and the people work together to overthrow and create a monarchy. And then they, uh, and the king becomes corrupt, and so the nobility and the people work together to create a democracy. Okay? And you can see the cycle happening today in the United States as well, right? Because who is Trump? Trump is a king. Does that make sense, you guys? What is, what is Trump saying? Trump is saying to the people, the elite are corrupt. The elite are stealing from you. The elite are lying to you. Vote for me, and I will destroy the elite, and I will give you more economic opportunities. Okay? Do you understand? So this is a really important idea. Trump is not going to be president for four years. His ambition is to be king. And we see the cycle throughout human history. So that's the idea of a cycle, right?
We also have another model of human history development, of human historical development, which is a line. A line, and the idea of progress towards truth. Okay? So that's the other competing model. Okay? There are two main models. There's a cycle, and then there's a line, and the idea of the line is human society does not go on and on in a useless cycle. It is moving towards a truth. It is moving towards a good end. Okay? So then this idea has been around for a very long time. Remember in the Bible, when, um, King David first sponsored the Bible, the Bible was a line where Yahweh, the God, he was looking for a friend. He was looking for someone who he could trust to rule his kingdom of heaven. And he first tried Adam and Eve, and they disobeyed him. Then he tried Noah. Then he tried Abraham. And then he tried Moses. And then he found his true friend, who is David. Okay? So the, the truth is David in the Hebrew Bible. Then you have the Romans. Okay? Remember the Romans. Virgil wrote something called the Aeneid. And in the Aeneid, Troy was destroyed so that Rome could be founded. And when Rome was founded, Rome will have to fight a series of wars that will eventually lead to the rise of Augustus Caesar, and this will create something called the Pax Romana. And this is the end of history. This is where all movement ends, because once you achieve the Pax Romana, there'll be no more war. Okay? So it's the idea of a line. Obviously, this is not true. But back then, when they came up with this history, they thought it was true. And, um, if you know a little bit about current history, then you'll know about a man named Francis Fukuyama, who is an American who works for the government, and he wrote something called The End of History, which is an essay arguing, um, that when the Soviet Union fell, it showed the end of history. Before history was a battle of ideas: communism, capitalism. And now, with the fall of the Soviet Union, we now know that Western liberal consumer democracy is the best system in the world. We no longer have to argue about this. Everyone should try to be a liberal consumer democracy, including China. And if everyone became a consumer liberal democracy, there would be no more war. We would want to fight because we're too busy spending money, and the best way they make money is through trade, not war. Okay? We all, we now also know this is not true. All right?
But the main, um, proponents of the line, the theory of history, progress of history, are actually Christians. Okay? Christians. Why? Because they believe that Jesus marks a turning point in history, and at the, and when Jesus came, it marked a progress towards truth. What is truth? Truth is the second coming of Jesus, which will mark the end of the world. When Jesus returns, he will, he will usher in a millennium, a thousand years of peace, when he will be king. We will all have to obey him. Okay? What I will show you in the future, when we discuss the Crusades, um, is that this idea, okay, it sounds like a simple idea, but this idea is what's driving a lot of the conflict in the Middle East, believe it or not. But there are millions of Christians, they're called Christian Zionists, by the way, who want war in the Middle East because if there's war in the Middle East and the world is about to end, Jesus has to return from heaven to save us. Okay? You think this is silly, you think this is crazy, but I'm telling you right now, this idea, which millions of people around the world believe in, it's one of the main causes of the war in the Middle East. And guys, crazy ideas make crazy events. All right? So there are people who literally believe that we can save the world by ending it. It's only the threat of nuclear Holocaust, it's, it's only the threat of the end of Israel that will force Jesus to return, ushering the second coming.
All right, now, what's important for us to understand is that these are the two basic frameworks of history, but there are variations to these two basic models. Okay? So, for example, Hegel. Okay, we'll discuss Friedrich Hegel later on in the semester. He's, he's really important, but he has this idea called the dialectic. The dialectic, dialectic just means a conflict, a conversation. So what he believes is that history is driven by ideas that are in conflict with each other. Okay? Wherever there's an idea, for example, let's say you have capitalism, then what will happen is a new idea will arise to challenge the existing idea. We'll call it communism. Okay? And then what will happen is these two ideas will merge together, and they will draw on the best parts of each other, and we can call this socialism. All right? So it's a line, okay, but it's, it's like this, almost, right? There's an idea, there's there's an idea, something comes in conflict, and it, and this leads to a new idea, which then leads to a new idea. But he still believes that we are progressing towards the truth through this conflict. All right? So we'll discuss Hegel and his theory of the dialectic, um, later on the semester, and this will lead, and this, the idea of the dialectic will lead to, of course, Marxism. Okay? So Marx is drawing a lot on Hegel and another philosopher named, um, Immanuel Kant for his theory of Communism, but we'll do that later on in the semester.
All right, so these are the two main models of historical development. You have the cycle, the history, circle, or the line. You either believe that things move in continuous motion, or they're moving towards an end. Okay? Does that make sense? Any questions about these two models so far?
Okay, so what you will learn this semester is a new model of historical development. Okay? It's a much more complicated model than these two models, but I think it is much more useful in helping us predict the causes of, um, historical development.
Um, I want to argue why these two models don't really work, and it has to do with the fact that history as an economic discipline is just not very good. It's not, what I mean by that is, you look at the world today, there's this Trump presidency, there's this conflict in the Ukraine, there's the Middle East conflict, and you would expect historians to come out and say, "Oh, this has happened before, and we can then predict what will happen, and so this is what's going to happen." Okay? But guess what, guys? They're not doing that. Also, they're not very good at predicting things. They're just not. History has, is notorious for not being able for not being able to tell us much about the future. And they say, well, it's because we look at the past. And for me, this is frustrating because if history is any good, if history is accurate, then it should help us predict the future, or, or at least better understand the present. Okay? So the idea of truth, what is truth? Well, truth does two things. First, explains why did this happen? Why did World War II start? And the answer we have today is like, Hitler was a bad guy, he was evil. Okay? That doesn't explain much for us. And then it also has to predict. It predicts. If it's truthful, then it predicts. And history doesn't do that. So I want to fix this problem by introducing a new model of history, which is a lot more complicated. I'll be honest with you, it's a lot more complicated, but I think for our purposes, it's more useful at explaining why things happen the way they do, and it helps us also predict what will happen.
And this model is what I call the oceanic curve of history. Imagine the world as a huge ocean, and within each ocean, there's an ecosystem which has currents, and then these currents come into conflict with each other, which leads to a new development. Okay? So think about hurricanes. And the thing that's really important about this model that I'm proposing is there's no moral judgment in it. Okay? I mean, obviously, in the line, the end where we're going is good, and where we're at now is bad. But what I'm saying is this moral judgment, saying this is good, this is bad, it's not helpful. It doesn't really tell us anything. All right? Okay. I'm much more interested in explaining why this happened, how this happened, and where this is going.
Okay, so let's look at the world to understand this theory. What I want, what I want to show you is the world is divided into cultural ecosystems. Okay? Cultural ecosystems. This is a really important idea. You, you need to know for the rest of the semester. What I will argue is that culture is the meta-reality. Meta-reality. So what's meta-reality? Meta-reality is the understanding, the world from which all other understandings derive. So what I'm saying is that culture is the most important part of who you are, much more important than your gender, much more important than your race, your ethnicity, much more important than your economic demographic. Okay? You're rich, you're poor. Okay? So to understand this idea, why culture is so important, I will do a thought experiment. Okay? A thought experiment. The thought experiment is this: Let's take a random guy from China 2,000 years ago. Okay? Just a random guy. We take him off the streets and we'll put him into China today. All right? Now, in 2,000 years, China has changed a lot, right? We now have the internet, we have computers, we have cell phones, we have skyscrapers, we have cars, we have roads. Okay? So China has changed a lot in these 2,000 years. How long would it take him for him to adapt to the new China? And might, and I would say, I would say most, five to 10 years, because even though on the surface, China has changed a lot, deep down inside, China's culture has stayed consistent for the past three to 4,000 years. So he, he would understand how to make friends. He would understand, if you were to get a job, how to, uh, associate with his boss and his colleagues. If he would get to get to, if we would get married, he would know how to raise his children to have them succeed in China. Okay? Does that make sense to you guys? It would take him time to learn how to use a cell phone and how to use a computer and how to drive a car, but he can do so. Does that make sense?
Now, let's do another experiment. Let's take a random guy from China today and put him in Germany today. Germany. Okay? What I will argue is this: he will never ever be able to adapt to the, the culture. He may get a job as a pizza delivery man, who knows? Okay? But he will never ever make friends who are German. He won't find a German wife. Whatever job he does, he won't know how to succeed. He won't know what to say to his boss. He won't know how to associate with his boss. Okay? Does that make sense? This is a guy who knows the internet, who knows how to drive a car, who can, who can speak English, but because of the culture, he's always a stranger. Does that make sense?
This thought experiment, I hope, shows you the persistence of culture. It's the most important part of who you are. It drives everything else. It drives how you see the world. It drives how you interact with others. Okay? So what matters is culture, and nothing else. And what I'm, what, what I want to show you this semester is the world can be divided into cultural ecosystems because of the history, because of the geography, because of the demographics. Okay? Does that make sense?
So look, Europe is a cultural ecosystem. All right? Meaning someone from Germany can go to Italy and still feel at home. They still, they don't speak the same language, the geography is different, but they share the same cultural orientation, the same cultural values. All right? Someone who who lives in the Middle East, okay, well, some, some call, um, the Levant, Israel, and other places, okay, but basically the Middle East, that's also another cultural ecosystem. Then you have, um, uh, the steppes. So remember the steppes are this grassland, this ocean of grassland that basically extends from Hungary to Mongolia. Okay? And then you have, um, China, India. Okay? So there are different, these, there these different ecosystems, cultural ecosystems that are determined by their geography, their history, and their demographics. And cultures respond to geography, history, and demographics. Okay? Does that make sense?
All right, now, what I will show you is that within each ecosystem, they're always interacting with each other. Okay? They're always interacting with each other, and when they change, they change their interaction with each other.
All right, so let's ask a really important question, which is why do empires, why do they fall? Why do they climb? Why do they fail? And this is a really important question. How was it possible for the Roman Empire to collapse? How were the Greeks able to defeat the Persian Empire? How were the Mongolians, the Mongols, able to conquer the Chinese Empire? All right? And what I will show you this semester is when this happens, when empires are conquered, the pattern is the same. There's a consistent pattern in this. All right? So let me explain the pattern, and then for the semester, we'll go into specific instances of this pattern to explore the, um, specifics. Does that make sense?
All right, so what happens is this: why empires fall is there's usually an empire. Let's just say Rome. And as they expand, they encounter something called the borderlands. Okay? Borderlands. Borderlands are just places that are, um, the intersections of empires. Okay? So Mongolia is the borderland of the Chinese Empire, right? Arabia is the borderland of the Byzantine and Sasanian Persian Empires. And the borderlands and the empire become at first symbiotic. Okay? Meaning they depend on each other. They, they work with each other. In three ways: the first, and the first most simple way that they interact is through trade. Okay? They trade with each other. Second way they interact is through, um, military cooperation. So what often happens is the empire needs mercenaries, and it turns out that people who live in the borderlands make very good soldiers. Okay? Because they live in a time of war and chaos in the borderlands, there's no central authority, so they're always fighting each other, so they make very good soldiers. And then the third way they interact is some people in the borderlands will raid and pillage the empire, the outskirts of the empire, for resources. Okay? So they are interacting with each other.
So the pattern is this: the borderlands first start off as as may an isolated region of the world. So Arabia, the steppes, and the dramatic north, what we call Scandinavia today, the northmen. So these are all isolated parts. But as the empire expands, they start to interact with these isolated ecosystems. And when they interact, we, and when they interact, what happens is these borderlands become energized. Okay? It's like the empire is adding fuel to the borderlands by giving them more wealth, by giving them more knowledge, by giving them more access to information. Okay? Does that make sense? And over time, what happens is because of this new energy, the borderlands become much more populated, much more wealthy, much more knowledgeable, and then it creates internal conflicts within their borderlands. And the only way for them to to resolve this conflict is to expand. Okay? They have to expand. Now, and in the process of expansion, what happens is now and then they will conquer the empire. All right? That's a pattern. The borderlands are first these isolated regions that no one knows much about. They're like the stuff of legend and myth. When the empire expands, it energizes these borderlands. The energy makes these borderlands more wealthy, more populated, and more militaristically sophisticated. That creates conflicts within the borderlands. Too many people. So what are they forced to do? They're forced to expand. And during the course of this expansion, they come in conflict with the empire, and now and then they will conquer the empire, become the new empire. That's a pattern, and it happens all over human history. Okay? This, this is how the Mongolians conquered China. This is how the Mamluks conquered China before the Mongolians. And the Mamluks conquered China. There was trade. Chinese, the Chinese Empire was using them as mercenaries. Okay? There was also a lot of small conflict. Does that make sense?
All right, so now that I've explained the pattern, the question then is, why would this happen? Why would this happen? How is it possible for the borderlands, which again is only a fraction of the wealth, the population, and the resources of the empire, how are they able to conquer the empire? And this is a really important lesson you will learn in this class, which is empires are destined to collapse. Empires must collapse. All right? So why is that the case?
In this class, you will learn there are three boundary conditions of all societies. Eventually, all societies must collapse for three reasons. All right? The first reason is elite overproduction. Second reason is rat utopia. And the third is, um, uh, financialization.
The first, when a society first starts, it's important for people to contribute to its growth. Right? I can do that by starting a farm. When, when I build a farm, I make goods, I'm creating wealth for the society, right? You can also do that by building a factory. But over time, what happens is you eventually realize that it's more profitable for you to lend money than to build things. Does that make sense? It's much more profitable, much easier for you to, um, be a capitalist than it is to be an entrepreneur. Over time, so there's this very famous French economist, his name is Thomas Piketty, and he wrote a book called, um, Capital in the 21st Century. It's a very good book. It's very easy to read, and it's one of the most discussed books right now. And he makes the argument, he makes the argument why inequality happens. Inequality in society happens because of the nature of capital. Okay? The nature of money. What money does is it seeks to grow for the sake of growing. And what's the best way for capital to grow? By consolidating and charging rents. Okay? Does that make sense? So the example is, okay, there are five restaurants in Beijing. They're obviously trying to compete against each other for customers, right? So, so they lower prices and try to get better food. But eventually, at some point, they figure out, hey, we're five restaurants, man. We can just get together and negotiate a cartel, a deal where we charge all the, all high prices, right? Then we make more money that way. That's something we call rent-seeking behavior. Rent-seeking. The idea of rent-seeking is to create a monopoly, which forces people to buy at whatever prices you charge them. That's the ultimate goal of, of industry or society or business, to engage in rent-seeking behavior. And over time, because capital consolidates, it's much more profitable to engage in capitalism than it is to engage in entrepreneurship. Meaning you're better off actually investing in the stock market than you are in getting a job. In fact, what he shows is the return on financial capitalism is 5% a year, on average. If you put $100 in the stock market, you make $5. All right? But the return on the real economy is only 2%. Meaning if you start a factory and you hire people, or you start a restaurant, which can, which makes, which contributes real growth, real wealth to the economy, you only make 2%. All right? And that's why if you go to America, and you will go to America eventually, you'll find that young people, your age, they're not working. What are they doing? They're investing in Bitcoin, they're playing the stock, the real estate market, they're investing in stocks. Do you understand? Because it's, you make more money doing that than you do by doing real work, by creating a company. You understand? In other words, your society isn't producing any value, and as a result, your economy can't move on. Right? Does that make sense? And when you're in this situation, what are you forced to do? Now, if you're, if you're society and you want to continue, what are you forced to do? Excuse me. Open. What do you do? Historically, what what have societies done in order to get out of this situation where financialization has taken over your society? Make war, guys. You understand? Because you make war, you destroy things. You destroy things, you are forced to rebuild things. It doesn't make sense. That's why we have war, because war means a game reset. It allows society to rebuild itself. Okay? So that's the first idea I want you guys to understand. Over time, the economy matures to a point where even becomes a renter. Okay? Or sorry, a rentier. You're trying to be a landlord and you're trying to charge people to use your land. You don't want to work. This is true throughout the world, right? In China, it's the same thing, throughout Chinese history. Now, in the West, it's the same thing as well. And at that point, you have no choice but to start a war to reset your society, or your society will continue to decline. Okay? So that's the first boundary condition. Why societies must die.
Second boundary condition is the idea of rat utopia. Okay? We discussed this a bit last semester. I want to refresh your memory. Rat utopia is an experiment that's been done many times, but the idea is this: what happens to rats in a perfect world? Normally, rats have an extremely ritualized society. So, for example, if you want to mate, okay, what male rats do is they go on top of a mound where all the female rats can see them, right? And the rats, the male rats start to dance. They do dance really, like, in a very strange way, but that attracts the attention of the female. The male rat sees attention to the female rat, and the male rat starts to chase the female rat. The female rat runs back into her burrow, her home, and hides. The male rat has to stand outside and wait for the female rat to come out. When she comes out, she will start running again, and he will start chasing her, and then she'll run back into her burrow again. They do this multiple times until eventually the female rat lets him catch her, and then they will have sex, and they'll be married and have children. Okay? So that's rat society, and it's no different from human society, right? You like a girl, or you a, or a boy, you guys go out for a coffee date, then a lunch date, and a dinner date, then eventually, after a couple of years, you might have sex and get married and have children. Okay? No different. It's a very heavily ritualized society.
What experimenters did was they asked themselves, what would happen if we made a perfect world where no one had to fight for food every day? Food would come down from the heavens, and all the rats could do whatever they want. They would have complete freedom. This is what we call rat utopia. It turned out all society collapsed. It was a complete disaster. The male rats started to rape female rats. There's no more like playing around, there's no more ritual. It was all just rape and murder. It was a complete breakdown of society. Why did this happen? Okay, there are many different theories, but one thing that you need to understand about rats and humans is we all like status. Status. Okay? The idea is this: we humans, we're all standing in line to go on to a mountain top. The mountain top, everyone respects you, you make a lot of money, you feel good about yourself. And we're all standing in line, and this line takes a long time, but eventually you will get to the mountain top. This is how this game works. Is people on the mountain top have to fall off and die in order for other people to climb up. Does that make sense? But what happens when the people on the mountain top don't die? Well, you're just stuck in line. When you're stuck in line, I'm not sure if you've been stuck in line for like hours and hours, but you get angry, right? You get frustrated. So what do you do? Well, you hit someone behind you, and then that person gets angry and hits back, hits you back. Okay? Eventually, this line, everyone's fighting each other, and people at the mountain on top are enjoying each other, are enjoying the view, they have status, and then they're never going to die. They're never going to fall off. And this is our society today, guys. Okay? The people in power in, in China, in the United States, around the world, have been there for a long, long time, and they're not dying. So what are young people doing? Tossing, ping, by line, right? Quiet quitting, lying flat, because you don't see any opportunities. What you want is not money, what you want is status, and that requires you to achieve a certain level in society. But those positions are being occupied by people who refuse to die. And as a result, society collapses. Young people refuse to work, they refuse to get married and have children. So your society dies, you understand? So rat utopia is the second boundary condition. Does that make sense, guys? You're seeing this around the world today. All right? Ask yourselves, why is it that you yourself are not motivated? The answer is, you really don't see an opportunity to climb to the top and enjoy status. You just don't, because people aren't dying. They just not. And why? Because we've achieved a certain level of abundance and wealth that allows people to keep on living. Okay? Does that make sense? Any questions before I continue? Are you guys clear about this?
And the third boundary condition is the idea of elite overproduction. What is elite overproduction? Well, it's the same as rat utopia, but rat utopia is a conflict between the haves and have-nots. Elite overproduction is a conflict among the haves, the very wealthy. Because even though there's a certain number, a limited number of status positions, too many elite people are being produced. Okay? So it's not only that the, um, children of poor people are being screwed over in the system, it's the children of the elite are being screwed over in the system. And this creates conflict in the system because the poor can't do anything, they can just fight each other in line. But the elite can do something. They can go to war against each other. They can monopolize. They can start, uh, killing each other. Okay? This creates civil war. In fact, if you are to look at America today, you can say there's a civil war going on between two different factions of the elite. Does that make sense? And this is what drives a lot of history, where a lot of revolutions happen, not because the poor are trying to overthrow the rich, it's because the lower nobility is fighting for opportunities against the upper nobility. Does that make sense, guys? Okay, we're seeing this again today in China and also in the United States.
All right, so these are the three main boundary conditions. So now let's apply to these three boundary conditions and ask ourselves, why do empires collapse? Well, the first reason is because most people in the empire don't want to live there. They're just stuck living there. Why do most people not want to live there? Because they are in debt. Okay? Debt and landlessness. Throughout most of human history, empires that have persisted for the longest have this huge problem where the majority of the population suffers from too much debt and suffers from too much landlessness, no opportunities. Then what happens is the elite starts fighting amongst themselves. There's corruption. Why is there corruption? Because the elite are struggling to engage in rent-seeking behavior amongst themselves. Okay? They're trying to steal more. They're stealing more and more. So there's corruption, there's civil conflict, and there's corruption. So it's only a matter of time before the empire collapses. But during this time, what does the empire do? Okay? It's really strange and funny, but what they do is this: they import people from the borderlands in order to try to resolve their civil conflicts. Does that make sense? You can't trust the army anymore because the army is made up of people who have too much debt and who are landless. So what do you do? You hire foreign mercenaries. Right? That's what China does, or, or that's what China did in its history. You can't trust your own army, so you hire foreign mercenaries, and eventually what happens is you replace your army with foreign mercenaries, and then eventually what happens? The foreign mercenaries take over your empire. That's what happened in Rome. That's what happened, uh, throughout human history.
Okay, so now that we've discussed the empire, I want to look at the borderlands. Why is it true that the borderlands are able to conquer the empire? And my argument to you is cultural. It's sorry, culture. It's cultural. All right? So we have this prejudice or misunderstanding about civilization. Civilization is about cities, it's about writing, it's about technology, it's about wealth. And if you look at it that way, then you don't really understand why is it these borderlands, the Mongolians, among Jews, the Vikings, the Arabians, the Greeks, why are they able to conquer these empires? That makes no sense to you. So what, what I'm trying to say, what I'm trying to tell you is this is a wrong way of looking at it. A better way of looking at it is culture. In the borderlands, there's a certain culture that develops because it's a borderland. It's a, it's a culture that focuses on freedom, egalitarianism, and self-reliance, independence. This is true throughout the borderlands. Okay? If you, if we were to go back to Mongolia during the time of Genghis Khan, if we were, if we were to go back to the European north of the time of Vikings, these are cultures that emphasize freedom, egalitarianism, and self-reliance. And as such, these were amazing warriors. Okay? So let's, let's look at an example. Let's look at the, um, Vikings. The Vikings didn't know how to read or write. They didn't have any mathematics. They didn't have cities. But from age two or three, their kids were learning how to swim, how to row boats, how to cook, how to hunt, how to fight, how to ride horses. Does that make sense? And what, what are civilized kids doing? They're learning how to do test questions, right? In a war, who's going to win? Well, obviously these guys. Okay? Does that make sense?
So these are the, this is the idea of the oceanic currents. Okay? You have these isolated areas that are ecosystems amongst themselves. As the empire expands, just think of it as a current, the imperial current, it's expanding, expanding, that's what empires do. It energizes these areas, and these areas actually have much more energetic potential than the empire, which is dying. Okay? And this energy forces so much energy in these borderlands that they have now become like a hurricane, and they have to ride through history. Some, they're defeated, but sometimes, like the Greeks, like the Vikings, like the Mongolians, like the Arabians, they win. And when they win, they create a lot of destruction. Okay? And that's the idea I want implanted in your head. These are currents. These are natural forces that are unstoppable once they start. You cannot stop them. This war in Ukraine, it is a hurricane that will engulf all of Europe. This war in the Middle East is a hurricane that will engulf the entire world. Once this starts, you can't have a conference and decide to end it. These things cannot end until they reach their natural course. The hurricane stops when it runs out of energy. Does that make sense? The hurricane does not negotiate with you and say, "Oh, well, you make a very good case for why I shouldn't destroy you, so I'll just stop." Hurricanes don't do that. These are natural forces, right? And this is what I will show you this semester. And I, I will also show you how this connects to current events. And then once we do that, we should be able to predict current events. And just let you know, spoiler alert, things will not end well. Okay? We are looking at the complete destruction of the world we live in today. Nothing will be the same because these are oceanic currents. They destroy everything in their path. Once you unleash them, they must destroy. It's only a question of how much, right? All right. Was this clear to you guys? Any questions? Anything you want, anything you want me to clarify or elaborate again? I know this is a big theory, but we will be doing a lot of examples throughout the course of the semester. All right? And this will give you a unified theory of history, and you'll see how everything, everything connects together, right?
Any questions? Oh, that's a good question. What starts these hurricanes, or what starts this process? All right, so if you look at an ocean, you will discover that these currents are happening all the time. You understand? There's no start. They're always in motion. All right? So once you start an empire, you're starting already to unleash a hurricane in the borderlands. Once the hurricane matures in the borderlands, it will engulf an empire, which will then start to energize a new borderland. Does that make sense? So that's a, that's a really good question. And unfortunately, the, the answer is, there will always be hurricanes. Hurricanes are always forming. You just have to figure out where they're forming in order to predict where, where they're coming from. Okay? But obviously, the two big hurricanes right now.
Are what's happening, um, in Ukraine and what's happening in Israel in the Middle East, okay? But, um, other hurricanes are coming, okay? Uh, for example, there will eventually be a conflict in East Asia, all right? Now, a lot of people are saying the conflict will be between, um, China and the United States. I do not think that's the case. I do not think, um, the conflict will be between the United States and China. I think it will involve Japan and South Korea, all right? It will not be over the Taiwan Strait. It will be between, it will involve South Korea and Japan. How so? I don't really know, okay?
Another conflict is what's happening in America. America, um, is itself a hurricane. Eventually, America will have to fight a civil war, and when you go to America, you will see how divided the country is, all right? And people are already predicting a civil war. It's the only question of when. I think things will speed up in 2028. The reason why is, um, the election in 2028 will be heavily contested. People are going to argue over who won, and it'll be very clear who won in 2028. And there's a very good chance Trump will run again in 2028, okay? But I, but I think these are two big hurricanes that are coming along the way, not now, but they're coming along the way. Um, the, the big scary hurricane, of course, is Iran, okay? Eventually, the United States and Iran will come in conflict with each other, okay? And this will drag in the entire world, right? Does, does that make sense to you, Eva? Okay, thanks for the question. Okay, any more questions?
[Music] Until it overwhelms the empire. That, that's a great question, okay? All right, so we have to figure out what is driving the hurricane, and the answer is the internal conflicts within the borderlands. Does that make sense? So there's just too many people, and there's just not enough status positions, so they go on and they conquer their own territory, right? So you look at the Vikings, okay? The Vikings, the Vikings are interesting. The Vikings, which we'll discuss a lot, they're in northern Europe, and for most of human history, we had actually no idea they were there, okay? They were in the north, in Denmark, in Norway, in Sweden, and they basically kept themselves. They still traded with the world, but we didn't really know much about them, okay? And then they started to come out of nowhere, and they did three things. They went over to colonize Greenland and Iceland, all right? And they also went to actually North America. So they were actually the first Europeans to reach North America. So one strategy that they had was to expand and explore and colonize, okay?
But then you also had a group of Vikings, Northmen, who went to attack France, and they were such a huge problem that the French decided to give them their own land called Normandy, okay? Normandy, the land of the North people, Normandy, all right? And then they went over here to Ukraine, uh, along the, uh, river because they were trading with the Islamic empire, and they found colonies or new, new settlements, and this was a peaceful process, okay? Because they were trying to establish trading posts, and this became the basis of which country you guys know, Russia, okay? You see, people will call the Rus. I actually don't know what Rus means, but it just means Rose, and that's where Russia comes from. So this is the beginning of a new country called Russia, all right? And Normandy is interesting because they eventually went off to conquer a new country. You guys know who they conquered? Who, who do the Normans conquer? 1066, guys, England, Britain, all right?
He, so the hurricane stops when the people just run out of energy because they've reached the point where they can't go on, okay? The hurricane is created because they have wealth, power, but they don't have enough status positions, so they have to expand to fill the status positions, okay? This is, this is actually what drives empire building. Does that make sense? It's not because you lack resources, it's because you have too many people who want status, and you can't fill them. You can't let them stay in your society because then they will overthrow you, so you send them somewhere else, okay? All right, good. Is that clear, Eko? Great. Any more questions? Great.
Okay, so, uh, I, I hope this was clear. We will continue discussing this throughout the, throughout the semester because this becomes the framework for which we understand all of European history for the past 2,000 years, okay? So next class, we will do the Roman Empire, the fall and decline of the Roman Empire, which will lead us into the rise of a system called the Holy Roman Empire, which is not the Roman Empire, okay? It's basically the French Empire, okay? Or the, um, Frankish Empire, and the Frankish Empire will lead to the rise of the Vikings, all right? All right, so those are the next three classes, all right? Great.