Transcription
This film you will follow is a completely self-supported endeavor.
The film's budget reached 4,000 British Pounds.
Under the patronage of the British Imperial Foundation.
Financial support and account follow-up were completed
by the patronage of the City of London.
It was prepared by the Spiderwebs,
relying on external communications around the world.
Which seized heritage from abroad
and established it in London.
The British soldier,
around the world you find him,
from Gibraltar to Hong Kong,
everywhere he stands against annual threats,
a symbol that explains the strength of common will.
Like a fire!
The Spiderweb:
It is considered the second empire of Britain.
The British Empire,
is the largest empire the world has known.
For nearly 300 years, Britain was the ruler,
armies carried out occupations,
banks dated their currencies to it.
One day it began to collapse,
one after another, countries began to declare their independence
from British occupation.
No military size could change the direction.
As all British elites and fortunes witnessed
their failure and losses.
They began searching for new laws
under the proposal of a desire to change the world.
Where the most important aspect was found,
which is the material situation.
This film presents how the direction of British occupation power was changed.
Until it transformed to represent financial power.
And how this transformation shaped the world
we live in,
in the days of British occupation.
The City of London was one of the most economically powerful cities.
The City of London was the heart of the economic power
of the British Empire.
Hopkins considered it the historical engine
of governance.
As the currency used by the occupied countries
by the Empire was the Pound Sterling.
The City of London was the facade that managed financial powers.
Not only within the Sterling circle,
but even outside the Sterling currency circle.
When the empire weakened,
the City of London was also weakened.
A British truck was bombed, resulting in the injury of 12 soldiers.
Riots increased and spread, especially in
the Cypriot colony.
Where violence prevailed, especially among young people,
university students.
Here, groups of girls dispersed.
After attacks and conflicts began
with the British military police.
With the deterioration and weakening of British control,
British commercial interests became under direct threat,
as the Egyptian Suez Canal was nationalized in 1956.
A new crisis emerged in the Middle East region.
When Egyptian President Nasser announced
to the masses in his speech in Alexandria,
in which he announced its nationalization
and that it was indeed nationalized and became Egypt's private property.
Britain and France declared a state of alert.
Its validity ended within hours.
British warplanes began to fly in the Egyptian sky.
And bombing began on the five most important cities,
including Cairo.
The United Nations opposed
this direct invasion.
Pressure began on France and Britain to withdraw their forces.
The United States of America had no direct involvement
in participating in these aggressions.
The hope and objective was that
this issue would be a point of interest
for discussion by the General Assembly
of the United Nations.
Where world opinion could be expressed and heard,
in order to seek an end to these aggressions.
Britain was neglected
and completely humiliated.
The Suez Canal issue was
the direct cause of the cancellation
of British occupation in Egypt,
and its position as a world superpower ended.
What increased the crisis was the weakness of the Pound Sterling,
which Britain relied on.
Some doubts arose at the time regarding the stance
of the United States government.
That it was the cause of the decline of the Pound Sterling.
Many financiers withdrew their money
from Britain.
Which led to a decline in the Pound Sterling.
In order for the British government to maintain the value of the Pound,
it reduced most debts in banks around the world.
Which made it difficult for them to continue
investment operations abroad.
Certainly, the government was not happy with this situation.
We did not fully comprehend the credibility of the situation
and the proposals,
but it was clear that they were made
by the banks and their representatives
who submitted them to the Bank of England,
which was under the dominant management
of banking sector representatives.
Apparently, they reached an agreement
among themselves that was not prepared or written.
They presented this agreement as if it were
a prior agreement between individuals,
as it was recorded according to the foreign exchange rate,
i.e., in dollars.
Only for this transaction and this type of negotiation.
Which appeared to be under the patronage of the British Bank
and not under the jurisdiction of the law.
Accordingly, the Bank in London began
to create a dollar market.
It was called the London Market
for European Currency.
This provided the possibility of isolating the central bank
from the activities of the European currency market,
as the money changers kept
some of the accounts.
London became a bank and the accredited and central bank of the United Kingdom.
In this way, they proved that
the European currency account
is not held in London,
but in another location.
And thus, London's responsibility
for regulating this market was absolved.
The objective was to provide a legal arena,
through which currency regulation operations
would be conducted secretly and unannounced.
And the importance of this operation
is to pretend that they are not directly involved in economic policy
at the time of regulation.
Thus, profits are reaped and taxes are recorded without
indicating the location of their regulation,
and claiming that all these operations take place elsewhere,
and it is not important now what the situation was or what it was.
Until the American Central Bank noticed
that London had demonstrated its ability to
evade the financial path of the United States of America.
As all global operations were transferred to the city.
At the same time that America began to transfer its bank,
and all global financial operations
to London,
another type of financial transaction began to emerge
in the financial market,
far from London in other jurisdictions
outside Britain.
The last remnants of the British Empire.
In 1960, the Isle of Man was hit by recession.
As mosquitoes were a major problem there,
enough to kill even cattle.
This was one of the legends or myths of the Isle of Man.
We do not know how much these stories
told facts and the truth.
It might be a narrative that did not happen there.
Accountants and lawyers from London,
arrived at the Isle of Man and to
some other occupied territories
and began drafting secret laws and regulations.
As secret sales operations began,
which were called secret judicial committees.
Illegal activities and operations began to appear on the Isle of Man.
Large sums from the marketing of goods began to arrive.
Tax evasion became an obvious process
that no one could escape.
As the Bank of London monitored all developments from London.
The report on secret operations became famous
on April 11, 1969.
We need to be more confident in these companies that are multiplying,
like banks, etc.
They are nothing more than
names and brass plates hanging,
manipulating the external assets of the islands
to keep them under control.
Of course, no objections were raised to what
these companies provide to non-residents,
and we must ensure that they do not provide and create
many opportunities
for transferring non-Sterling currencies
out of areas not governed by British laws.
These small territories, which are
the last possessions of the British Empire,
and which are still considered overseas territories to this day,
and are still under British control to this day.
The number of these colonies is about 14,
seven of them pay taxes called friendly taxes.
Including the Isle of Man, Bermuda,
the British Virgin Islands.
Britain is considered the country that
imposes the largest taxes in the world.
The use of the Euro expanded due to the supply of large quantities of money from abroad.
These amounts reached 500 billion dollars in 1980.
In 1988, it reached 8.05 trillion dollars.
In 1997, it reached approximately 90%
of international loan imports.
This was the reason for the establishment of this financial market.
The sinking of the British Empire had a great impact,
but the City of London undertook the rescue operation.
The City of London became the accredited financial market,
and it became characterized by strangeness,
as it was called a city within a city
and a province within a province.
And it became managed by companies called the City of London Corporation,
and private companies became the ones managing municipal affairs
with a police force and special courts.
Some of those who are not British,
and few who are locals,
perhaps did not notice or experience the strangeness
of the matter and the attention to the small details in the City of London
due to the vast size of London.
The City of London is an independent entity from the rest of the wider London,
as it has its own Lord Mayor,
and his powers differ from the Mayor of London.
As the Lord Mayor became a theatrical performance to evaluate the city,
where the oldest celebration in the world is held.
The City of London has historically carried strict legal strangeness.
The reason was when the conqueror William occupied the rule in 1066, as history mentions.
The city was one of the poorest and most failed British cities before the conquest.
A deal was struck in 1067
with the city,
allowing them to continue their influence.
To this day in the City of London,
which is the broadest legal example that
governs all of Britain.
It is the political system that has managed
everything since the Middle Ages.
Its voters are the ones who control
the city, not its residents,
through business owners,
i.e., the capital that manages the city,
as its Lord Mayor is elected by
representatives from the Middle Ages.
These Lord Mayors are the ones
who represent the residents in Parliament
and are called representatives or deputies,
regardless of their clerks
and scribes in Parliament.
He is the only person who has not been elected before.
All influential people in Parliament are present
in the meeting hall.
The City of London has its own hall for representation
in Parliament,
whose role is to report everything that happens
to the London Institution
via "Perland" to "Lopament"
in the name of the city.
It is clear that the London Institution
is trained and shows interest,
and this attracts the attention of politicians, scholars,
economists, and economic strategists.
But I do not know any of them
who actually studied system programming
in the London Institution,
so as to influence politics and economic policy.
Therefore, we can only summarize the mention,
as some assume or exaggerate in their mention,
that this institution possesses great power
and is capable, in one way or another, of shaping the British system,
especially concerning financial systems.
"Clement Attlee," the Prime Minister who
came after World War II,
had a saying regarding
the London Institution:
"We repeat and repeat many times that we are looked upon
in this country,
as another power contrary to what was drawn in the power of East London.
The City of London has become a convincing case
for directing economic interests.
It is capable of confronting
the country.
The wealthy have gained the ability to
create systems inside and outside the country,
contrary to what the public decides."
The Bank of England is located in the heart
of the City of London.
The Bank of England is not just a central bank,
it is also considered the financial regulator
in all parts of the empire.
The Bank of England usually uses its power to govern in financial matters,
and this is what attracts other banks in the world to it.
Especially since 1972,
when the bank presented its own certificate.
The bank assesses and monitors loans and debts
around the world.
As all operations take place at the head office in London.
The British financial institution grew within ten years,
becoming the seventh largest banking power in the world.
After ten years, this institution went completely bankrupt.
News: Earlier today, Mr. Richard Kerr,
Deputy Director of the American Central Intelligence Agency, stated
that American intelligence supported the activities of the British financial institution
around the world.
But the British banking institution
did not only cooperate with secret intelligence,
but was involved in fraud and financial forgery,
money laundering, and supporting terrorism,
supporting major crimes throughout the universe permanently,
on a mind-boggling level.
News: The Bank of England
supports terrorism.
As it did not directly supervise these terrorist operations
to protect the bank's collapse.
I am speaking and telling you with complete directness,
as there was a lot of information
that the Bank of England
was the reason for the closure of the British financial institution
15 months prior.
Millions of depositors and owners
of funds suffered deterioration.
Many informants from the British intelligence agency
reported what was happening.
Despite this, the Bank of England did not play any role,
even though the bank had plenty of time to intervene and did not,
but it did not do so due to the traditions
that were in effect at the time.
And everything seemed like mere conversation
at lunch.
Everything seemed to be going well with some.
As the situation began to look good.
Mr. Robert Light Pemberton,
Governor of the Bank of England,
commented at the time of the British institution's collapse
that the current supervisory system
has served society.
If the bank were to close every time,
it would be an opportunity to discover fraud.
This means we would have fewer banks than the current situation.
London was the city where business deals
that were not allowed to take place anywhere else were conducted.
Where bankers are not burdened with worrying
about the consequences of their actions.
And perhaps this is the reason for the proliferation of banks
today in London,
more than any other financial center
in Britain. No one goes to prison.
It is difficult for a bank owner to go to prison.
Generally, it does not happen.
These are very protected locations.
And this is a model of Britain's overseas operations,
where it is emphasized that money is safer.
Put your money with us, and we will protect it for you.
This is the common saying.
You will not be arrested or imprisoned.
You can do whatever you want.
Transactions called "transparent touch" were what
attracted money owners to London.
Some of them were done in complete secrecy,
almost from the early sixties
and continued.
The City of London began to establish branches abroad,
especially in former British settlements.
The goal of these branches was to create another base for secret procedures
and legislation.
The goal was to entice capitals from other countries
around the world.
The secrecy of Swiss banks was the most famous.
You know the purpose of putting your money in a Swiss account.
And therefore, it will not be reported by its locations.
This was one type of secrecy,
and another type of using secrecy,
which is the type of trust that Britain practices.
A mechanism that draws a slippery path
and a complex and deceptive trust.
Trust has been a legend since
Greek times,
when a knight would set off
to fight in foreign lands,
leaving their possessions in the care of
guards they trusted.
The concept of ownership ultimately flowed into
what trust means.
Ownership is not trivial.
And thus, the knight grants the resident the authority
of care to another person.
And whoever understands the necessity of recalling such
days must be a lawyer.
Legally, the individual is distanced from this type of support.
As barriers are available, they are not for you.
As it is difficult to determine taxes on them,
as it is difficult to find what contradicts you
with assets of such connections,
especially in British jurisdictions,
where there are no trusted jurisdictions.
Anyone can establish a guardianship and recommendation,
where there are no registrations for these guardianships,
where no one acknowledges
such established trust.
The only person who knows the types of these agreements
is the notaries and those responsible for notarization,
as there is no need to adhere to notarization.
There are no documented financial documents.
They are not required to submit annual financial reports.
As the art of notarization depends on
intentions in arranging the invisible.
Economist John Christensen
was an economic advisor who said,
he worked in the secretariat of Jersey law for about ten years.
We are not talking about a few million,
but trillions.
Trillions of dollars,
which belonged to no one.
They were not subject to tax or any other need.
As their ownership was not registered to anyone.
Everything: works of art, millions of gold, cars,
properties, bets.
Not just financial reliance,
but amounts of money that have no financial location.
All belonged to these organizations,
residing there and not registered in anyone's name.
Now that things have become clear,
the amount we are talking about
is worth $50 trillion.
It sits outside under the management of these mechanisms.
The Isle of Man was and remains under British occupation,
and it was signed within the exchange treaty
between Britain and other European countries
to control taxes.
Everyone now needs to provide automatic details
to prove ownership of bank accounts
and how they were used.
The Isle of Man was the first to sign the agreement
last week.
It is important to identify the Isle of Man
as the first occupied protectorate to agree to such an agreement
with the United Kingdom.
I believe this may directly reflect on the contract offered,
as the Isle of Man took the stance of participating in eradicating
tax evasion operations.
As the essence of the matter now depends on the credibility
of the British secretariat,
as they did not use the secrecy of opening accounts
as Swiss banks did.
As the British expressed a desire to abolish banking secrecy,
because they then controlled the largest share of the market.
For this reason, the British are doing so.
Anglo-Saxon funds
are a building block of such a structure,
as they create the foundation by building complex financial structures,
where each jurisdiction offers a set of secret services,
from financial companies offering trust to shell companies,
companies established on bank accounts,
and accredited and secret managers.
The formation of these services is a complex structure,
rotating through many jurisdictions,
which helps create a secret construction quality,
making it impossible to penetrate.
And certainly, this structure makes it difficult
for financial institutions to rise above it
or circumvent it.
Financial companies manage and support types of supportive policies
under the guise of shell companies.
Each company violates the other in the accredited jurisdiction.
One jurisdiction belongs to a company,
and accredited individuals are in other regions.
The beneficiaries are elsewhere,
as they own accredited companies
in other regions.
Each of these companies owns credit rights and assets,
as they enjoy financial immunity,
and owners of yachts, racehorses, and bank accounts,
paintings, shares in other companies.
There are many such trust-granting companies
and they operate on a purely secret basis outside the country.
Certainly, there are many lawyers who work for these companies in an accredited capacity,
contributing to the creation of a complex, difficult-to-penetrate structure.
And certainly, the goal is to hide the identity of the true owner
of these companies abroad,
and to allow capital owners to flourish
and re-establish their presence in the global financial market.
Looking at the real amounts,
they are managed from tax revenues.
As you see, this is the slope on which all conversations
between me and some wonderful people are conducted.
People fighting against imposed taxes.
It has not changed the situation.
It is a world where you speak and repeat and reiterate,
where the response is "You amaze me with what you say."
But I continue to do what is required.
We know everything today,
because we obtained the Panama documents.
We saw them, but it is difficult to assess the dispute.
We are unable to change.
Because this system is supported and protected.
Few people have benefited from it,
and this constitutes a small percentage of beneficiaries.
But they have power.
And this is what I see in the Panama Committee, of which I am a member.
There is little we can change.
We need public participation
by identifying the registered ownership of beneficiaries,
in financial companies and all other types of companies.
It is easy.
The Panamanian papers were leaked
by the law firm "Mossack Fonseca."
"Mossack Fonseca" is the fourth largest law firm.
The other nine companies are
among the largest law and law firms,
registered in Britain legally abroad.
When other companies submit their claims to Britain.
As for the activities, they were carried out and lost
security and evasion.
Britain claimed that these regions are independent
and there is nothing that can be done or done there.
I have heard repeatedly from some officials
that Germany, Paris, and Washington,
in addition to other countries,
have been informed by the British government.
Yes, they are fully aware of everything happening in Jersey.
They also think what is happening is unfortunate,
but they do not have the authority to intervene.
But this is a blatant and direct lie.
They have the power and authority to intervene,
but they chose not to.
Britain usually plays such tricks,
as they pretend when they see the need.
The reason for their testimony is that these territories are independent.
Ultimately, Britain nominated the government,
as it nominated names and nominated them to assume some positions
in these regions.
They became responsible for foreign relations
and defense.
And they can also use the veto right
and legislation.
And thus, it seemed that Britain had
great control.
In essence, it controlled these regions.
This allows them to provide a political status.
During this period, when the economic advisor in Jersey
Mr. John Christensen was often traveling to London,
and that was to speak with many British government offices on various topics.
He said, as an economic advisor, this means
I have many connections with various government offices.
Traditionally, the British government tried not to interfere
in the internal affairs of Jersey.
And thus, through cunning, it was possible to go to someone in the Ministry of the Interior
or the Treasury,
and they could say
in reality, we are not keen on such legislation.
It would be a good idea if you did not go down this path.
While sipping a cup of tea.
This is a sign that does not indicate strength of position.
This was an indication to return to the island
and advice that they do not prefer to take such action.
They add that the British government does not wish to interfere
in general.
Instead, continue meetings and clarify desires outside the scope of official meetings.
As there is no written plan or even an official letter.
Discussions usually take place behind closed doors.
This is the nature of the relationship these places have
with London.
This is what the British government's policy states.
The interlocutors understand each other.
Any Briton or
anyone who knows they are British,
they all know well that any conversation between them
usually carries cunning.
You can almost understand the symbols they use in conversation
when some of them mention things.
They master the language. What happens in many paradoxes.
People are beginning to understand what is happening.
And most likely, this is the main issue.
The relationship with Britain to evade the fever of taxation.
I also believe there is a lot of understanding of what we can assess and present,
without any of us needing to state it explicitly.
Instead of keeping the powers hidden,
Britain has the ability to claim
that these legally occupied small states
are politically independent.
The independence of the Isle of Man was not included in the government's agenda.
This is the message that was sent to
the committee responsible for approving independence
at the United Nations.
Lawyer Steve Macfield
represents the government at the UN meeting.
The committee was formed
to help end occupation
around the world and declare independence.
But Mr. Macfield said
he would clarify matters.
The Isle of Man is not ready for such a transformation.
This message indicates that
the Prime Minister, the Member of Parliament, and the party
do not have a mandate from the Isle of Man to declare independence.
He said this is the message I carry.
When the Bahamas declared its independence from
British occupation in 1967,
offshore banks relocated to the Isle of Man
and continued their operations from there.
The connections were, of course, British.
This reassured bankers and financiers that their money was safe.
This is the British edifice and foundation.
This is what provided trust in such locations,
by financial service conglomerates
outside the country and everyone involved.
In reality, a portion of the wealth
was managed by Britain outside the country,
controlled and managed by the City of London.
The City of London, with its large size,
was involved in dirty work
outside London
for fear that the business organizer
might take the work seriously
and start prosecuting them legally.
Then London would be accused of fraud.
Therefore, it was more appropriate to commit fraud
outside the country, especially in Gibraltar and Jersey,
where the risk is lower
and they might not be subjected to legal prosecution.
Deals are usually discussed and concluded
in the City of London.
But their registration is done outside the country
so as not to be subject to taxes
and regulatory oversight.
What was allowed was that the city would be involved
in dirty work,
but when the scandal surfaced,
some accredited individuals would state that
there was nothing more that could be done
and claim that it was not their fault but
the tax fever, and we live in the active city environment.
We cannot be involved in this type of work.
Therefore, this relationship seems very comfortable and amazing.
The City of London has almost contained these methods
of currency in Jersey and other locations abroad,
and created a raging tax world.
I see these areas now look like
Frankenstein's monster,
created by the City of London.
The United Kingdom today is considered
the largest global economic client.
The United Kingdom has become a unique global economic financier.
If you look at this data,
a type of data that was secretly built,
where you can monitor the percentage of shares in each country,
in the professional supply of global economic services.
These are financial economic services that do not belong to the country's residents.
Now there are two largest centers,
compared to other smaller centers.
The two centers are in the center of the United Kingdom,
equivalent to 19% of other global markets.
And the United Kingdom and all its colonies,
which own approximately 25%
of the global financial market.
Added to all jurisdictions,
former colonies and colonies that have gained semi-independence,
namely: Singapore, Hong Kong,
Bahrain, Cyprus, and perhaps even Dubai.
Equivalent to 40% of the total value.
And I believe this percentage constitutes
a strong position for London.
The economic situation in London in
the global financial market.
The army remained, and all the occupied administration.
The army and all administrations in all colonies left,
but they retained influence and a hand in all financial liquidity in the colonies.
From the former parts of some colonies around the world.
And thus, it can be described as
the second empire.
Britain's second empire,
in an attempt to hide and manage the financial empire in many parts of the world.
According to the time and programming of the British Empire,
where the City of London was the largest financial market in the world.
Not only among British colonies
but even independent ones.
All their banking operations were conducted in London,
and they relied on using the British currency
in all their commercial contracts.
With the weakening of the empire,
the position of the City of London also weakened.
Which led London to establish the Euro Financial Market.
Which helped the continued expansion of the London Bank and its value.
The process of exploiting all services and networks
during the empire period,
and building judicial secrecy,
which gave the bank the authority to possess large amounts of cheap money.
Many international banks opened branches in the City of London,
to benefit from British colonies
and their laws.
This type of system
occupied a position through occupation.
Until 1962 regarding France.
As for Britain, it is unknown.
Perhaps the same time, no more.
Britain was actually present
in India and some other colonies.
This is evident when looking
at tax flows,
as they increased when collected from the colonies.
Colonialism's power overflows and continues to develop methods of plunder.
The rich organize crimes through their companies,
transferring all their money abroad in complete secrecy
so as not to be subject to taxes.
Similarly, countries around the world
began to liberalize and open
their economies.
It became very easy to carry out such operations.
Today, we can say that about half the world
lives in some wealth.
Perhaps it was hidden within the legal secrecy
in Britain.
One of the losers in Africa,
often joins the capital linked to the network
of the modern British Empire.
And therefore, I believe this did not happen by chance from the British Empire abroad.
It varies in appearance between scarcity
and increase at the same time,
as a result of the fall of the previous empire.
We try to pretend that Africa
appears as the largest debtor network in the world.
But this was the size of its debts.
At the end of 2008, its debts amounted to $177 billion.
As for the debts of Sub-Saharan Africa,
its debts amounted to $177 billion in 2008.
As the wealth of these countries was transferred abroad,
estimated between 1970-2000
to be equivalent to $944 billion.
Five times larger than the value of their foreign debts.
9.44 billion pounds, if calculated mathematically,
would be far from being a debtor network.
Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa
are net creditors to the rest of the world.
As capital was transferred outside the borders.
African countries borrowed loans
globally at very high interest rates.
Over time, these debts became very large,
to the point where they seem difficult to repay.
Secret judicial processes were
one of the factors that led
to the growth of famine among peoples,
at the expense of their wealth through tax management.
As many other countries grew,
including modern cadres.
As the UN body tax was organized,
and its rate increased.
As is commonly known today, these are UN tax committees.
As they are always present whenever this happens.
During the development of the Addis Ababa process,
which occurred last year.
I believe that the United States of America
and the United Kingdom are the ones who prepared the prohibition operations.
So that these tax committees are formed.
Do you see why they do not want to make any democratic decision?
A global decision on how to
count and impose taxes outside borders.
I do not comprehend such a situation.
As long as we conduct activities outside borders,
this means involvement in crimes
and illegal activities.
As long as we are unable
to separate the two,
this situation will continue to create problems.
Western countries try to close any attempt
to remain transparent and flexible
for global financial liquidity,
and to implement international standards
for collecting taxes outside borders.
At a time when elites are developing offshore centers
to hide their wealth abroad.
Oil in Gabon did not benefit the Gabonese people.
This applies to copper wealth in Zambia,
gold in Mozambique and Mali.
Rather, it benefits the companies that extract them.
But it served the corrupt elite in the country,
in developing the tax system in countries
outside borders.
How easy it is for these elites to plunder and steal.
It helped them steal a lot of money,
and keep it safe elsewhere.
Under illicit financial flows.
Due to the use of pseudonyms.
These were incentives that helped
the growth of corruption.
This was the reason for its availability in a number of countries,
where the progress of such corruption is activated without difficulty.
It is the ability of some individuals and their goals
to achieve follow-up
according to the mechanics of hidden corruption liquidity.
As some mechanisms have excelled in achieving power,
where the possibility exists to start transferring development
by any representative of any country
on a global level. Some have developed
leading to the loss of trillions of dollars
each year,
especially in the centralization of central taxation.
Most of this wealth was for
Western countries,
like America and the United Kingdom.
Which kept their currency strong,
while the development of other currencies remained very weak.
And corruption overflowed in the Western world,
as it achieved unexpected effects.
While the American and British economies began to centralize financially.
The assets of these financial systems
eliminated the power of manufacturing.
If we go back to the sixties,
there were widespread demonstrations against the war in Vietnam
by the United States of America.
Widespread demonstrations and gatherings.
At a time when President Johnson allowed them to be announced,
while American intelligence was monitoring all anti-war activities.
In 1960, American economist
Michael Hudson,
was working to pursue Manhattan Bank
in the stock market.
As he was pursuing economic payments.
During the sixties,
the balance of payments for the United States of America was reserved,
which was the reason for military payments abroad.
As dollars were flying out of the United States of America.
This was a result of the costs of the Vietnam War.
The United States of America tried to prevent
dollars from flying to Vietnam,
to be deposited in foreign banks.
The government asked the follower to open
a branch in Saigon.
During the Vietnam War.
As you can see and imagine, it was difficult
to get access.
As it meant losing its stronghold.
Which led it to seek the help of its follower,
who said,
"If it is difficult to get the money that was being thrown to the army in Vietnam,
then you can travel to the French bank
and it will become General de Gaulle's share.
And it is known what he can do every month.
He will convert the currency into gold."
And this is exactly what the United States was trying to stop.
The United States did not succeed in preventing
the transfer of dollars abroad.
Therefore, it began to prepare for other plans.
In 1967, Mr. Michael Hudson
submitted his memorandum.
By a former employee of the department,
and he mentioned in 1967 that he submitted it through a former employee
of the staff department,
in the elevator in the follow-up department in Manhattan.
A memorandum from a conservation institution,
discussing the necessity of pursuing
Manhattan's presidency and the need to control it.
Which helps the United States of America
to be the Switzerland of the world.
Meaning to be the financial capital.
The Federal Department asked me to provide an assessment and testimony.
"How much money does the United States need
to be the Switzerland of the world and how to do it?"
The plan was to organize
offshore banking centers.
In the Caribbean and other regions.
And how much money might not enter directly
from the pursued funds,
because this would not be legally nice.
But what happened to Latin American criminals,
and other criminals, like drug traffickers
and all types of organized gangs,
they were the ones who deposited their money
in Caribbean banks abroad.
And these foreign banks abroad,
deposit liquid funds in the main center
of the United States.
By transferring dollars from foreign banks
to within the United States,
the United States was able to
prevent such dollar transfers.
Which helps it support the currency and its value.
Every country monitors the price of foreign currencies
and their exchange.
The foreign exchange rate was not only important for exports.
It is the accredited and central capital.
And if you look at the IMF's imports,
and annual financial statistics and studies,
you will have a kind of trade balance stability.
Independent migrants and financial transfers,
were in a state of rise and fall.
And they were called debts and interest.
What the International Monetary Fund and the United Nations called omitted debt residuals.
The reason for their deletion
was that they did not want anyone to notice them.
In 1930, Mr. Roy Ovid Hall,
an economist working at the Chamber of Commerce,
wished to point out criminal operations
as part of the statistical balance payments.
Congress was very angry.
I was informed of the disputes that occurred
in Washington.
"We are Christian countries, we have no desire to
announce and publicize crime in reports."
As any financial transaction coming from crimes was prevented from being mentioned as payments in the financial budget.
I believe it is now called omitted debt residuals.
It is difficult to call it remaining criminal money flow.
In the sixties and seventies,
Britain faced a dilemma similar to what happened in the United States of America.
Money was flowing abroad, and this was the reason
for the weakness of the Pound Sterling.
As Britain realized that it was able to
support its currency.
By opening the domestic market to trillions of dollars.
Through its offshore financial haven.
As happened in the United States of America.
This step had an unexpected side effect.
The Bank of England today, as in the 19th century,
does not invest its money in British products.
Rather, they invest their money in
real estate speculation,
in financial speculation and the foreign exchange market.
And thus, the financial movement in London
helped to de-industrialize the country.
Because it secured and supported the Sterling currency.
By this huge liquidity of funds.
This flow of drug trade money,
crimes, and tax evasion,
which happens around the world, is now coming to London,
instead of going to Switzerland, the Caribbean,
and Liechtenstein.
With the silent support of the United States of America.
As the growth of the British currency abroad expanded.
And even before that.
A long time from the systems of countries outside their borders, and it became dominant in the global financial market. Few knew how this market worked. In 1986, economist John Christensen went abroad to investigate, where he applied for a job at the Jersey office, which is considered one of the largest accounting firms in the world. At Deloitte & Touche, where I was working at the time in the credit management company, which is concerned with managing what happens abroad, I specifically went abroad to work in this location, because here you can deal with foreign companies, oil companies, insurance companies, all under the management of this institution. In this way, I was able to see the largest accounting firm globally, exactly as their clients do. I completed all entries into client files, and during my time with Deloitte & Touche, I investigated over 100 cases for the company's clients, and this is what I found. There were some traders who worked in the forgery market. Some of them avoided mentioning illegal arms dealers, donation contracts for some politicians with fake election campaigns, some bribery checks, and financial receipts for illegal commercial pricing and tax evasion receipts. This is what the company's clients were doing. Based on some examples I studied for a group of clients, not a single client was involved in what could be considered a legal act. Everyone was involved in a lot of evasion, tax evasion, and worse.
I met Mr. Carl Levin, who was a former US senator, where he presented many investigations into foreign banks. He asked the bankers at the bank, "What do you think of the percentage between depositors and bank clients?" where these companies were used for illicit purposes, and the answer was, "I believe that 99.9% of clients were using these companies for prohibited purposes." This is the reality. These American banks tell what they do, and this is the same way British bankers dealt in Panama, Bermuda, and the Cayman Islands, so that they could have accounts in Panama, Bermuda, and the Cayman Islands, where secret authorities were heavily used to conduct black and fraudulent financial activities, areas managed secretly and not just desired, where illegal businesses were imposed, until the possibility of building secret harbors was available, not out of a desire to pay high costs. Today, nearly half the world is a secret jurisdiction, according to British reliability. In general, it is indicated that all these transactions are explicit and clear, and their financial services are guaranteed and reliable. All are legitimately participating in economic and financial activities. Our economy was not built on secrecy, but on guarantee and trust. It was built on the basis of customary good nature. It was built on the basis of honest governments and good rulers, within the British legal system. This is what our financial institutions are based on. In any case, tonight we received from the head of the financial institution in the Cayman Islands, after what a group of tax collectors in the United States of America did, the evaders announced their new plans. They decided to go to the Cayman Islands to draw attention to what they feel, which is tax evasion. The head of finance, Mr. Richard Cole, said that he is encouraging a group to visit, and he also said that the financial department has nothing to hide. And I would say that anyone who wishes to come to the Cayman Islands to know what we do here, come here to see. We have many secrets. When I went to the Cayman Islands in 2008, I contacted the government spokesperson and he said, "We have an order from higher centers stating that no one is allowed to speak to you, even for a short time." In 2011, journalist Nicholas Saxon published the island's budget, a pioneering book detailing the system of offshore countries. The writer of global media reports said he welcomes dialogue with the financial representative in the Cayman Islands, Mr. Tony Travers. Mr. Travers contacted journalist Nicholas Saxon, and some fools remained with the same idea for about 11 years. There will always be political envy. Today, the size of small minds and political envies has worsened, those who did not understand the reality of the matter and how the Cayman Islands live. I have no knowledge now of what he is talking about, and he has no knowledge of what he is saying. The Cayman Islands are considered the fifth largest financial center in the world, hosting about 80,000 registered companies, about three-quarters of the world's reserve funds, and $1.9 trillion in deposits. Its population is about 60,000, equivalent to the homeless population in New York City. A strange mix of foreign nationalities from around the world, former British boys' schools represent the largest ground for intelligence members in the world, a public site for crimes, lords and ladies from high society and with them the most important bankers, a large financial segment and the power of the wealthy. Do not be surprised when it is described as the British paradise abroad, where its own strange mechanisms were developed to prevent any information from leaking out. For many individuals who work abroad, and do not like what they are doing, it is very difficult to assess the dispute, because they will face individual grudges, which makes it unnatural, "which makes it difficult to get a promotion and what may not please your family." Generally, they may "call for them to be thrown in prison." This may be very harsh. We are talking extensively about the basic structure, in this case the British institution, and its mechanism is very, very shrewd and clever, in using a kind of denial without trial. This eccentric mechanism works simply because someone tries to announce or point to a new approach or system. Not only are they fired, but they may be assigned a lot of work, so that they are managed in a completely different direction. Someone has complete knowledge of the type of repression abroad, he is Mr. Stewart Seaford, who was a former deputy for Jersey in the Ministry of Public Health. He leaked a report about a nurse who was working part-time in 2009, which included suspicion of killing a patient in Jersey Hospital. Jersey News: All this was mentioned during the state's presidential debate. On Tuesday, March 10. Deputy Stewart Seaford was the cause of a complete stalemate, claiming that Deputy Jamie Brecard had insulted and cursed him, and told him to go bury himself. Deputy Mr. Brecard denied such an accusation. Less than a week later, he was forced to admit that he had lied. Now Mr. Brecard has proven that he was informed of this later. Deputy Stewart Seaford was forced to provide services to others, which tightened his wrists. I was arrested at home in the morning, by six plainclothes police officers (wearing civilian clothes), accompanied by two data audit police officers, and also accompanied by two armed company officers. The attack was carried out using handcuffs used to arrest drug networks. Ten police officers pounced on him without a search warrant. The residence was turned upside down. All computers were searched and seized. All private memory and programs were stolen by the police. Moments before we started filming, a police officer left the police station, passing by in a hurry and smiling at the camera. The officer was on his way to check the bicycle bell. This is what he did several times throughout the interview. When it came to pursuing me, Mr. Stewart Seaford was prosecuted under the Data Protection Act. When the authorities were prosecuting me, I claimed that this was a defense of public interest, and with the help of some witnesses, I was able to submit some reports, which canceled all judicial charges and closed them. In response, the court ruled that the defense of Mr. Stewart Seaford's case, that he leaked a report claiming it was in the public interest, became difficult to believe. He was prosecuted in the same way without a defense case. For seven years, Mr. Stewart Seaford was brought to trial and imprisoned three times. He did not know when or where this trial would end, nor did he know when or where he would be behind bars. Looking at Jersey from the outside, it appears as if it was designated for a prosecution system. It seemed to have a law and judiciary, but it was not realistic. It was like a Potemkin village. The system in Jersey could not tolerate any kind of opposition... or even focus naturally. The experience Mr. Stewart Seaford went through may have seemed extremely harsh. He was simply suppressed and oppressed, as he was tried based on false evidence. The continuation of the interviews was also boring... These are some examples of the type of pressure exerted in Jersey. All the things that cause annoyance and harassment to people were done. They usually did not go to the extreme that was used with me, according to the way I was arrested and imprisoned. The authorities used all kinds of small surveillance methods to interfere in people's affairs, a kind of generalization of secrecy, such as obstructing people and making life more difficult. If you annoy the Jersey authorities, it may be difficult for you to get a job, and your children may not get good jobs. These are the methods used. I went to Jersey in March 2009 with Mr. Nicholas Saxon. About 24 hours after arriving in Jersey, after we had been there for a few days, Nick said to me, "Have you noticed that we are being followed?" From the moment we arrived at the airport until now, we have been followed. Don't look now because we are being followed at this moment, and he seemed to be right, as we were indeed being followed. I found it to be a truly annoying and confusing situation. They have a saying in Jersey, "If you don't like the situation here, there's always a boat available every morning." "Jersey's financial situation" promotional literature states, "Jersey represents the other part of London." It is no different from the activities that London engages in, which are difficult to carry out in London. We are talking here about one company called Appleby. I will just read what is circulated through their network. Anyone in Appleby company was present not only in political offices, but in many centers in Bermuda and Jersey, the Isle of Man, the Cayman Islands, as an employee in judicial offices, and they are proud of this fact, that their employees and clients are rotated between people who hold power in offshore economic centers. The same lawyers and accountants who founded the offshore administrative body, and also held small political seats in all British territories outside the flag, and most politicians are businessmen. They form the pressure point for the continuation of work and the assessment of business interests and their concerns. They are the focal point for how all legislation is passed. And to organize corporate policy and its boards and members as expected. There is no place for dirty money in Britain. Certainly, and the desire for no dirty money anywhere. The challenge I am trying to explain here is that in every country, it is an attempt to eradicate corruption, to ensure that those private companies operate with complete transparency. The need for transparency in the operation of foreign companies within the country is also needed, and to spread transparent dealings around the world. What British politicians say is that they have suppressed the secret judiciary from practicing corruption, but they have actually assessed the dispute. I was talking to some politicians in Brussels, and they told me that they have more destructive organizations than in London. Among them are politicians who come to them to protect the situation in London, more than the protection provided to other companies in the European Union. This gives you an idea of the extent of extremism that British politicians who see themselves as lobbying groups or organizations for London tend towards.
Where our big story begins, the Cayman Islands offer transparent dealings as it has been recognized in the financial services sector by all global communities. At the beginning of the week, Mr. Cameron, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, told Parliament that the general tax rate set in all territories belonging to the Kingdom is unfair. Some private businesses of several British political figures dealing with London and the secret judiciary were restricted. "Ian Cameron," the father of former Prime Minister "David Cameron," specialized in offshore financial accounts. He was involved in shaping offshore trust policy in the 1980s. In St. Helier Court, behind me now, the following was found. Documents called "Profits from Trusts," which were attached to the English will. "Ian Cameron," the father of David Cameron, was certainly a very wealthy man. In 2009, his wealth was estimated at £10 million by researchers at The Sunday Times newspaper. When Mr. Ian Cameron died in 2010, his wealth was assessed at less than expected, it was only £2.07 million. In any case, this is the situation of politicians and all their close associates, their helpers, their families, and so on... and businessmen who supported political parties who used offshore services for themselves. Therefore, they were not concerned about closing such services. If they wanted to close them, they would do so tomorrow. The truth is, they did not want to close them, because they were complicit in doing such things. If you belong to the same lineage and know the right people, then all the temptations of legal courtesies fall away. It becomes easy to evade and escape any act you desire, making it easy for the big ones to escape easily, and when you know you need them, you knock on their door, it becomes easy for you to set up any offshore company. Perhaps they will tell you to stay away, but to be a member of their network, from here you can set up any of these businesses. This is a very important part of the entire system's structure. These are the institutional schools for the entire British upper class. This has been the case for centuries. The distinguished elites of the old British institutions have carved out a permanent profit network for themselves around the world. After the fall of the empire, they transformed their positions from managing the empire to financial managers around the world and global companies. The more the financial leakage from abroad increased, the more the direct impact on societies abroad began to appear. The truth is not as it seems and as you believe. The Prime Minister is the one with the power to make decisions regarding your country. Rather, the power was hidden here. It became easy to own one country after another around the world, where the credibility of imposing taxes was eliminated. According to corrupt ownership, it undermined governments' ability to offer a sound budget to citizens. Tax evasion cases overflowed, especially by finance ministers in Greece and France, which led to the generalization and direction of such a system in general. The volume of private companies, and a flood of landowners in all of London, and nearly half of Scottish land. Do we really realize the situation we have reached in terms of government or private sector, and which is better, regarding the advantage of assets in income distribution, at a time when we practice concealment? Who wants to know who they are dealing with? Those who wish to work in government departments or deal with individuals who manage operations secretly, who have huge and unknown offshore financial dealings? This is a bad trend for the whole world. We need citizens to be aware of what is happening, and to understand that they bear the burden of what is happening by some individuals who represent positions of power who absolve themselves of the failure to pay taxes. Ordinary citizens pay taxes, not the rich. This approach leads to populism and discrimination between individuals, because it clearly shows who rules the world today, and they are not qualified to care for citizens. In the sixties and seventies, tax evasion or refusal to pay was seen as a kind of opposition to the institutional system. You know how the stone rolls. Mr. Phil Collins and others like him who flee abroad. It seems like a kind of general rebellion, and if you are quick-witted to understand what is happening today, this is the institutional system followed in offshore countries. Today, the elite and wealthy classes abroad, multinational foreign companies manage their affairs. Tax is what assesses business transparency. This type of distinguished fraud requires a vast infrastructure. I would like to talk about the numbering of the infrastructure for the highly educated who believe they have the right to support those who cheat society. We now have a new mafia in town. It does not shoot people, it does not stuff bullets in their knees, but it trades lethally. It deprives opportunities that provide healthcare, education, judiciary, secrecy, and loyalty to life. Accountants constitute a high percentage of those working in offshore state systems. Their management and institutions allow private sector companies to transfer their money abroad and avoid taxes. There are about 2.05 billion certified accountants on this earth. Their number is about 330,000 in the United Kingdom. Well-known figures, their elegance is clear, they eat well and their salaries are high. They opened offices in the city center. They are paid to achieve the dream of tax evasion, whether individuals or companies. We elect the government that says "Elect us." We will provide you with better healthcare, better education, and better security and secrecy. But the country's children tell them the next day, "We apologize, owners, you elected this government, but we have a tax evasion system like Amazon, Google, and Microsoft. Those who are not covered by the tax payment system in your jurisdiction. You voted badly for it, but you must find other ways." It is a mad world. It is part of the business world for accounting firm models that help you increase taxes, which do not serve the public interest. These companies are rewarded by awarding contracts to them. They are the same companies that advise the local and central government. They are the same companies that prepare company accounts and inform us that everything is going well. When I discussed the price with a partner from Waterhouse, I argued with him face to face, and he told me: "Professor Sika, you have not given us any trust in anything. We supply millions of dollars in revenue and have many, many clients who trust us. What is your problem?" My answer at the time was very simple, "This is the language of drug dealers and pimps." In Britain, a type of servant class began to emerge. One of the service workers was Dave Hartnett, whose reputation grew, and he was one of the officials at HM Revenue and Customs. "Dave Hartnett" found another way to collect taxes, where agreements were made individually and behind closed doors. In case the client was a major client, "Dave Hartnett" always led his meetings to discuss contracts himself. British Telecommunications was the first company to try the new system and received revenues of approximately 1 billion. "Ben Frowen," CEO of BT Telecommunications, wrote: The good thing was the collections for each share were approximately 14%. Our harvest was a balance of 1 billion pounds from the taxman. "Dave Hartnett" reported that this approach is more professional and correct. The court litigation process is very expensive throughout history and to this day around the world, and I believe the goal is to overcome what is possible. The art in this work is the process of convincing people to pay through persuasion and acceptance. Pay your tax! Pay your tax! After the demonstrations in 2011, Treasury deputies questioned Mr. Dave Hartnett. "David Hartnett" claimed that it was not possible to provide any information to protect the privacy of taxpayers. What could stand in your way of delivering such information to Parliament? This is Mr. Barkley's advice to me to refrain, and my colleagues were also prevented from appearing by order of the Commission. "David Hartnett" refused to refer to the advice given to him, indicating that it might reveal some information that could warn HM Revenue and Customs. The Revenue and Customs office was under "David Hartnett" himself. Exactly as the mafia infiltrates the state. Accounting firms have also infiltrated the state. The head of the tax evasion department in the United Kingdom was one of the employees of these companies. The new candidate for the head of the Revenue and Customs department, who represents the tax judiciary, was a partner at KPMG. Most of their partners have infiltrated the state. They manage the Treasury. Financial services and their follow-up in Britain have all infiltrated the state. And the law began to be designed in a way that benefits them. The degree of political capture of London was carried out by the largest banks and judicial institutions on a large scale, to the extent that most politicians became their spokesmen. This led to the government's lack of desire to provide public interest, on one of the Oxford evenings, a group of protesters confronted "Dave Hartnett." I am sorry to interrupt you, we will not take more than a few minutes of your time. We are here tonight to present an award to Mr. Dave, an award for what he has done throughout his life in shaping the statement of tax services. Dave has been a true friend to all institutions, a good friend for many years. In fact, it is difficult to thank you enough for all that you have given. For Vodafone, which provided billions in tax bills, nearly 25 million for our friends at Goldman Sachs, each one, and every one of these intruders. This is a crime of breach of trust. Sir, you will go and be deported directly, before we unleash the dogs on you. Because you proved to be a very good person, because you proved to be a very good person. Goldman Sachs also said. Goldman Sachs also said. Leave, you have defiled sacred things, leave. After "Dave Hartnett" was retired, he moved to work in the private sector. One of his positions was at the accounting firm Deloitte, where he advised foreign companies on tax planning. "Dave Hartnett" is considered a companion when you realize that he has paved the way, a honor bestowed upon him by the British monarch. You are considered one of the former ministers who provided advice through accounting firms. Accounting firms usually provide jobs and experts to serve ministries. For me, this is evidence of the corruption of the foundations of the structure. People are now selling and buying influence. When a former minister works for an accounting firm, he does not provide any accounting information, but rather provides opportunities for politicians inside and outside, and this is exactly what they do. I hope now you can share my view that I do not trust all bankers, nor do I trust most lawyers, nor do I trust most accounting firms. In fact, I believe they are involved in a conspiracy against the public interest. In Britain, all political, financial, and governmental complexities are based on ensuring corruption, especially in public offices. The financial structure is usually complex, even when it is announced to the public, it is not widely recognized. An example of this is private financial initiatives. "PFI" stands for Private Financial Initiatives. It is a way to support public infrastructure, such as hospitals, schools, roads, and bridges, by following them financially by the private sector instead of taking the path of central government. Historically, over a period of 30 to 40 years, the payment amounts have generally been three to four times higher than if borrowed from the central government as expected. In reality, it is nothing but a financial fraud. As soon as the private financial initiatives prepare their plan, you will find that the four largest accounting firms actually pay some of the employees in the Treasury, who are actually the ones who commit fraud in sales and provide advice on organizing contracts for all private sector financial initiatives by public authorities. They invite influential influence to deal with them, and we will show you how you can market all assistance through them. In other words, we explain how to commit legal fraud. Authority has become owned in tax offices even outside the country. HM Revenue and Customs, which is responsible for collecting taxes in the United Kingdom, its offices are owned by some in Bermuda through a company called "Meyble Steps." Something hard to believe. It is the same company that owns public revenue contracts to manage the central tax books. Borrowing interest reached 15% from foreign investors. Because their interest was high, the company began to lose a lot of money, and therefore did not pay taxes. In 2011, HM Revenue and Customs could not prove anything about private financial imports that they were paying any taxes in the United Kingdom. I think we need to have a serious dialogue about the government's role in this entire defeat and the extent of penetration or infiltration into the government by large banks and accounting firms. In the end, the benefit remains for those who work. The African Purchasing Power Conference held in London in 2016. The reason for the demonstration outside the African Conference hall was the desire to ensure that African peoples know that some politicians have suffered a severe failure here in the United Kingdom. We are aware that such products were not marketed to Africa according to their information. The main goal is to spread the possibility of financial services reaching new markets. All of them are almost exclusively focused on meeting the needs of the London market. What you see is essentially a type of occupation. In the beginning, you had control over production and all natural and human resources through occupation. And through this control by some countries like Britain, which was the largest empire in the world and which formed the largest network, and now this network is used to develop and spread financial services. London was the heart of the British Empire. The British Empire fell, and the city transformed itself from a tactical hub to a financial mechanic of the empire to a global financial center. The former insignificant settlements became the base for spider networks to organize offshore judiciary secrecy. This led to the growth of wealth around the world and its concentration in London. Today, about 25% of the global financial system is concentrated in British colonies. This is equivalent to about half of the world's secret judiciary under British protection. About half of offshore wealth is hidden in British overseas territories. The way in which the wealth of British elites or the elite increases, as well as former ministers and senior civil servants, retired secret intelligence MI5 and MI6 who hold general advisory positions after their service. All together, they have turned liberated states and Britain into the largest tax evasion spot in the world, causing a deficit in development around the world, and turning Britain itself into a country that serves the interests of the elite and the elite, making it very difficult to end tax evaders. These are five steps by which we can put an end to them. 1- Prevent local municipalities from awarding contracts to companies that organize evasion. 2- Build public registers for company owners and some trust-based institutions. 3- Establish an institution that relies on complete transparency in its dealings between companies and the government. 4- Identify the general country that reports on multinational companies. 5- Provide ways for automatic information exchange between all countries.