أخيــــراً..كشف سبب تأخير الضربة الأمريكية على ايران و اعلان موعد الحرب الحاسمة

السلام عليكم، ازيكم؟ في أسئلة كثيرة فيما يخص حرب أمريكا وإيران، والحقيقة الأسئلة دي يعني ما حدش عارف يجاوب عليها. وخلي بالك، إحنا بنقرأ الكتاب ما بنقرأش مسؤولين، والمسؤولين بطبيعة الحال صعب يقولوا لك معلومات عسكرية. بس الأسئلة دي زي إيه مثلاً؟ زي مثلاً ليه الضربة الأمريكية اتأخرت ضد إيران؟ وليه قعدنا الوقت ده كله؟ وفي نفس الوقت إحنا عمالين نسمع إن والله أمريكا عمالة طول عندها مشاكل في الصواريخ بتاعتها، عندها مشاكل في الدفاعات الجوية والكلام ده كله زي ما قال موقع. وتلاقي برضه ناس تقول لك خلي بالك ده إيران ممكن ترد وتفتح حرب مفتوحة. كلام كتير جداً الحقيقة.

أكثر حد ممكن يجاوبك على الأسئلة دي كلها حد واحد بس. حد كان قائد القيادة المركزية الأمريكية سابقاً ورئيس المخابرات الأمريكية سابقاً اسمه ديفيد بتريوس. ديفيد بتريوس ده رجل خطير جداً في أمريكا بالمناسبة يعني، لأن الراجل ده ببساطة هو اللي قام بعملية غزو العراق، وده كان قائد القيادة المركزية الأمريكية. فيعرف حاجات كتيرة جداً عن إيران، وكان في موقع مسؤولية وفي نفس الوقت كان بيقود المخابرات الأمريكية. فأنت قدام شخص ذو خبرة كبير جداً. وخلي بالك، الراجل ده هيجاوبك بصراحة لأنه خارج السلطة، فهيقول لك تقديراته هو. لو كان في الوقت ده موجود كان إيه اللي هيعمله. الحقيقة فجئت إن موقع فورين بوليسي عن طريق رئيس تحرير الموقع عامل إنترفيو أو لقاء مع ديفيد بتريوس، واكتشفت إجابات خطيرة جداً. ليه أمريكا متأخرة الضربة؟ أمريكا بتدور على إيه في إيران؟ لو أمريكا عايزة تضرب إيران هتضربها إزاي؟ كلام كتير جداً جداً. بس الحقيقة الإجابات كانت أكتر من رائعة، لأن إحنا بنتكلم على شخص في المسؤولية. فالإنترفيو ده أو اللقاء ده هيفرق معاك بشدة، لأنك هتلاقي إجابات صعب أي مقالة تجاوب لك عليها. بس أنا عشان هقول لك الكلام ده كله وأكفيك، لازم أقول لك القصة من الأول. قبل ما أخش في الموضوع، قبل ما أكشف لك التفاصيل، خليني أقول لك إن إحنا معانا راعي قوي جداً ومحترم جداً وهو >> كلنا بنسمع إن دبي والسعودية هم أرض الفرص، الأماكن اللي أنت ممكن تفتح فيها شركتك وأنت بتحلم إن البزنس بتاعك هيتطور بسرعة ويجيلك كم من المبيعات غير طبيعي. بس للأسف أي حد بيروح يفتح شركة في الإمارات والسعودية بيفاجأ إن في ورق كتير لازم يخلص، وإن في ضرائب وإقامات وحاجات كتيرة ما بتبقاش عارف تخلصها إزاي وإمتى. وهنا أنا عندي لك الحل، أبشر بزنس. لأن ببساطة أبشر بزنس قررت إنها تفتح لك كل الأبواب المغلقة. وما تنساش إن أبشر بزنس عملت عروض مخصوصة لمشاهدي قناة سامري اللي عاوزين يفتحوا شركات واللي عندهم شركات عاوزين يفتحوا لها في دبي والسعودية. لو عينك على السوق الإماراتي، الإمارات، أبشر بزنس هتساعدك تدخل السوق الإماراتي عن طريق تأسيس شركتك. ده شامل الإقامة وفتح حساب بنكي والتسجيل الضريبي، والأهم إن الرخصة هتكون في إيدك في خلال خمس أيام فقط. كل ده هم كمان مش هيسيبوك، هيفضلوا معاك ويكملوا المتابعة معاك ويكونوا جنبك في أي إجراءات أنت محتاج تخلصها. أما بقى لو عينك على الوحش السعودي والقوة الشرائية المرعبة اللي هناك، فالموضوع بقى أسهل بكتير، أسهل مما ممكن تتخيل. دلوقتي تقدر تفتح وتدخل السوق اللي يعتبر من أكبر أسواق المنطقة، المنطقة حالياً، وبشكل قانوني واحترافي بنسبة 100%. أبشر بزنس مش موجودين في الإمارات والسعودية فقط، موجودين في أكتر من 14 دولة. يعني من الآخر كده أبشر بزنس هو حلقة الوصل الكبيرة. أبشر عاملة عرض ضخم خصم لحد 15% لكل متابعي قناة سامري. لو دخلت على اللينك اللي أسفل الفيديو ومليت بياناتك كلها، وما تنساش أول ما يكلموك تقول لهم سامري بزنس. فان ده الكود اللي هتحصل بيه على الخصم الضخم جداً ده. هسيب لحضرتك اللينك بتاع أبشر بزنس أسفل الفيديو لو حابب تتواصل معاهم فوراً وتحصل على الخصم الضخم جداً اللي مش هتلاقيه غير في سامري تشانل. >>

نخش في الموضوع على طول. نخش في الموضوع على طول. الجديد اللي معايا النهارده ممكن يكون مختلف بالنسبة لحضرتك وأول ما راح تسمعه فيما يخص الضربة الأولى. إيه اللي حصل بالظبط؟ اللي حصل إن ديفيد بتريوس عمل إنترفيو مع فورين بوليسي، والحقيقة الإنترفيو ده كان أكتر من رائع، لأنه جاوب على حاجات كتيرة جداً. طيب نمشي مع الأسئلة اللي تم طرحها من قبل رئيس تحرير فورين بوليسي، رافي أكروال، على ديفيد بتريوس. رافي أكروال بيسأل يعني بيقول له إحنا عمالين نسمع دلوقتي إن والله دان كين اللي هو رئيس أركان الجيش الأمريكي كان قعد مع دونالد ترامب وأبدى مخاوفه يعني إن الحرب دي لو طالت هيكون في خطر على الجيش الأمريكي، وإن بنسمع برضه إن أمريكا ما عندهاش صواريخ كافية للتصدي للهجمات الإيرانية، وإن والله ممكن إيران تسبب خسائر كبيرة جداً. الإجابة هنا كانت أكتر من رائعة. ليه؟ الحقيقة ديفيد بتريوس بيرد على رئيس تحرير فورين بوليسي بيقول له خد بالك اللي بيتسرب ده معلومات حساسة جداً، بس أنت لازم تبص على إن الإدارة الأمريكية ساكتة. يعني الإدارة الأمريكية ما بتعلقش على المعلومات الحساسة جداً دي. يعني أنا لسه الفيديو اللي فات قلت لك خلي بالك ده الجيش الأمريكي عشان يشن حملة جوية هتستمر فقط من سبعة لـ 10 أيام وفقاً لنيويورك تايمز. القصة هنا ديفيد بتريوس بيقول لك سكوت الإدارة الأمريكية ده أمر يعني غريب، بس المعلومات اللي بتتسرّب دي معلومات قوية. ولازم تعرف إن القادة بتوع الجيش الأمريكي مش في إيديهم سلطة إن هم يقولوا للرئيس اضرب ولا ما تضربش. مش في إيديهم إن هم يعملوا كده. كل القصة إن الرئيس بيقول أهدافه، عاوز يعمل إيه، والجيش ينفذ الأهداف دي. إنما مش في سلطة الجيش يقول والله إحنا هنضرب ولا ما نضربش، ولا ده يتعمل بعملية عسكرية ولا بعملية تفاوضية. ما فيش الكلام ده.

طيب المعلومات اللي بتطلع دي بتطلع ليه؟ قال لك خلي بالك الجيش الأمريكي حالياً بيعمل حاجة اسمها "مثل ما" أو حسابات الصواريخ. يعني إيه؟ يعني خلي بالك الجيش الأمريكي عمال يحسب الدفاعات الجوية اللي عنده، صواريخ الدفاعات الجوية والكلام ده كله. وفي نفس الوقت عمال يحسب منصات إطلاق الصواريخ اللي عند إيران والمسيرات وحرب الـ 12 يوم حصل فيها إيه والكلام ده كله.

The fact that David Petraeus says the operation is extremely delicate, but there are some ambiguous points. Like what, for example? Like, will Hezbollah get involved or not? Because you're talking about other calculations here. We're not talking about the number of missiles Iran has, we've also added a new missile force to the fight. Second, what missiles do the Houthis have, and will they join the war or not? Third question, how will Iran respond? Will it be with a drowning operation first, or can Iran absorb the strike significantly? The truth is, what the US military is doing and the information being leaked is healthy information. Of course, he criticizes that it is leaked information, but he tells you that this is healthy. The US military is currently calculating, with pen and paper, what it has and what it owes. Okay, because they seem to be heading towards war. He also mentioned a very dangerous point. He said, "Be careful, you must know that the US military, under the current administration, has carried out dangerous operations without casualties." For example, you don't have a "Black Hawk Down" incident, the American plane, or the problem in Somalia. You're not entering a war in Afghanistan with casualties in Afghanistan. On the contrary, you are under the current American administration, which is Donald Trump. So you must know that you have captured a president. So you are a military that should be at its peak. Okay. So what the military is doing is that it wants to carry out a clean operation, okay, without any casualties. So what the man wants to say is, "Be careful, what you have done before, okay, you cannot lose it in Iran." This is the purpose that David Petraeus wants to convey. So all of this is good.

The editor-in-chief of Foreign Policy asked David Petraeus, "So, how do you think the US military might strike Iran? What could be done against Iran?" The truth is, David Petraeus also responded with an excellent answer. He said, "Be careful, the US military can cause great damage to Iran, very great. It can do many things. It can do something called a 'demonstration strike'." What is a demonstration strike? These are dummy strikes. These dummy strikes are either strikes to distract the enemy, so you might suggest to the enemy that you will attack a certain target, while you are attacking the main target elsewhere. So you distract the enemy. Or strikes that convey messages. He said the US military can carry out dummy strikes. It might try to capture the Supreme Leader, for example, and carry out an operation that makes the Iranian regime believe that it wants to kill the Supreme Leader. This could send a deadly message to the Iranian regime, which is that it must negotiate because the Americans are very serious. In addition, the US military can strike missile depots, strike missile launchers, and strike Iran's air capabilities and all of that. So here you are talking about a huge military capability in the Middle East, and this military capability gives the US military huge options against Iran, and strikes that will be deadly to the Iranian regime. If the US military wants to cause damage, it will be able to cause damage. And this is because, be careful, Donald Trump wants a better deal than the one Barack Obama made with the Iranian regime. And naturally, what Barack Obama got, which is the nuclear deal, with the Iranian regime in 2015, is the best thing Iran can offer America. Beyond that, you need to carry out a military operation to force the Iranian regime to concede. So if Donald Trump wants an excellent deal, he must carry out a military operation. The truth is, Ravi Agrawal, the editor-in-chief of Foreign Policy, was saying, "I feel like you are afraid that the US military might fail in the military operation against Iran." Is that correct? He asked if America could fail in Iran. The truth is, David Petraeus replied, "I am not afraid of anything like that, but I want to say that everything must go as best as possible. And the fact that the American strikes have been delayed until now means that the US military is making precise calculations to carry out a deadly operation that will be a surprise to the whole world and will be very powerful, especially since we are talking about a regime that has not shown any weakness. Despite the large demonstrations within the Iranian regime and the popular uprising and all of that, you do not see any weakness in the Iranian regime or any disintegration. On the contrary, the Iranian regime is still intact. So here you are talking about a regime that is not like the Egyptian army. Look at this dangerous talk. He said, "We are talking about elements of the ZIG, which is the Iranian internal security. These are armed people, and they have no problem opening fire on their own people, unlike, for example, the Egyptian army in Tahrir in 2011, when it came out peacefully to deal with protesters." He said you are talking about a version of the army that was keen to deal with its people peacefully. But here you are facing a regime that sees its life as more important than the Iranian people. So this is a statement that I liked very much, and this is an important matter.

Ravi Agrawal was asking David Petraeus, "What is America looking for inside Iran, or what is it playing at?" That is, "What is the most important question America must answer before going to war with Iran?" He said, "Well, the most important point is the missile launchers. This is what America must look for, strike, and destroy significantly. Why?" He said, "Because you don't know now how many missile launchers Iran has. By the way, the weak point of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard is not the number of missiles it has, but the missile launchers. Iran has a problem acquiring missile launchers. Missile launchers are the vehicles on which missiles are placed." He said, "The most important thing is that we are talking about a military operation that Israel will not carry out. Air forces might be limited. We are talking about weakening the air forces that launched the 12-day war. So the first thing these forces must do is suppress air defenses. And suppressing air defenses, in his opinion, is easy. Why?" He said, "Well, in the 12-day war, Israel destroyed a large part of Iran's air defenses. And his opinion is that Iran did not manage to develop or obtain other air defense systems from Russia, like the S-300 that was hit in the 12-day war. Why?" Because he sees that the Russians are bogged down in the war in Ukraine and will not be able to reinforce Iran's air defenses significantly. They might have sent one or two systems, but the man is talking about the quantity. Russia will not be able to support the Iranian regime with the quantity it wants to secure its sky.

So David Petraeus believes that the point here is suppressing air defenses, which is easy. But finding missile launchers, striking them, and targeting them is a very complex matter. Because you don't know where Iran wants to launch these missiles from, and what type of missiles it will launch. Especially since you have lost the advantage of range. What do I mean? Before, in the 12-day war, Iran was striking Israel. You are now talking about a distance of 1500 kilometers. But when Iran strikes the Gulf, you don't have the same distance. So you have lost an important advantage. The missile that will be launched will hit. And the truth is, David Petraeus returns to the first point, which is that the US military has a track record under the current US administration and does not want to lose this track record against Iran. He said, "Be careful, you have a big problem. What is it? You have many assets threatened by Iran. And these assets, for example, you are talking about the 12-day war, Iran launched strong operations with the drowning system against Israel. And despite the huge numbers of the US military and the Israeli military to confront Iranian drones and missiles, Iranian missiles hit Israel. So here you are facing a point where it is clear that you cannot confront Iranian missiles 100%. So if one Iranian missile hits an important American target or asset in the Middle East, you are facing a bad day. And this is what he meant by threatening your track record since Donald Trump entered the White House. Here you are talking about damage, and here is an American asset versus your most important allies, which are the Gulf states. So this is an important matter.

Something else. He said, "Be careful, Iran, as soon as it does, and the most likely option is that it will mine the Strait of Hormuz. If one mine hits an American ship, you are facing a harsh day, not a bad day, a very harsh and difficult day for the US administration." You are facing something that could happen. And at the same time, when Iran mines the Strait of Hormuz, you don't know how long it will take to remove these mines, and how long the process of removing these mines will take. So by the time you remove these mines, it will take time, which will affect oil prices and all of that. So this is an important matter. The second thing. He said, "Be careful, we are talking about missiles and drones, and you are also talking about ground forces on the Iranian side, which is an integrated system. The story here is about the official or accurate number, you don't know how much. And you don't know how the number of drones will be exploited. You don't know what the Strait of Hormuz will be like. There are ambiguous points." So the truth is, the editor-in-chief of Foreign Policy asked David Petraeus a very important question. He said, "So, when the US intelligence comes to work now in Iran, what might it know and how will it work, and what might it not know?" This question is very appealing to me. Why? Be careful, David Petraeus is not a military commander. He led the US intelligence. What are its recommendations? He said, "Be careful, when US intelligence comes to work on Iran now, it will work by all means. First, it will work on classified information or open-source information, and open-source and non-open-source information. Cyber warfare, so that they hack computers. They will try to operate artificial intelligence. They will try to intercept communications." But he said, "The important information." He said, "They will also look at videos of individuals or ordinary Iranians who are posting videos from the street." He said, "Because everyone with a mobile phone is a journalist. And be careful, open-source information is sometimes more important than secret information." This is the first time I've learned this. He said, "If someone is walking with a mobile phone and posts a video on the internet, there might be information that America itself doesn't know." So he said, "Open-source information is very important. So America, inside Iran, will not work with one system, like spies or cyber warfare. No, they will work with everything. They will gather, or they are currently gathering, as much information as possible about Iran by all means."

Okay, but David Petraeus, and this is the point that was very dangerous for me, said, "Be careful of an important point. Israel will work with the CIA. And you are talking about the 8200 unit, which already played a big role in the 12-day war, and they have experience inside Iran, and they have their spies inside Iran. So you have the two biggest spies, or the two biggest intelligence organizations, working in Iran now. But they are not alone." Why? You must know that now, almost all intelligence agencies in the Middle East are working inside Iran. They might be exchanging information with US intelligence. That is, what he means is, for example, you have Bahraini intelligence. Okay, if it has information about Iran, will it withhold it from America? Will it withhold it from America? So, Kuwaiti intelligence, for example, has information about the situation inside Iran, or sensitive information about the movement of the Iranian army or the Iranian Revolutionary Guard to strike an American destroyer. Will it withhold it from America? And apply this example to all the countries in the region. That is, we are talking here that it is not Israel that is going to war against Iran. You are talking about the Americans, okay, who are allies in the whole region. So if an intelligence agency knows information, it might share it with the American side, especially in the context of war. We are in a war situation. So it might give you a piece of information that could be very useful to you. So this is an important matter. So here you are talking about Iran currently, most intelligence agencies, and anyone who knows information in the region, America will know it. So here you are talking about a point of extreme danger that I never imagined.

Ravi Agrawal asked David Petraeus, "If you were the commander of the US Central Command now, what are the most important weapons you would rely on?" He said, "The most important weapon I would want to enhance significantly is refueling aircraft. Why?" He said, "Because be careful, you now have Gulf countries that have closed their airspace, and you will not be allowed to use their bases. So, in order for you to have a kind of flexibility or maneuverability to deal with Iran, refueling aircraft are the primary weapon that will give you this flexibility. You can bring fighters from Europe, you can fly fighters from aircraft carriers, wherever these aircraft carriers are. You want to strike Iran from Jordan, you can fly planes to strike from Jordan. You want to fly planes from anywhere. These refueling aircraft are the primary weapon that the current commander of the Central Command would demand to increase their numbers significantly." Second, what? He said, "Well, air defenses. If I were the commander of the Central Command now, I would request the largest possible number of air defenses to be deployed in the Middle East region."

Ravi Agrawal was asking David Petraeus, "What is your opinion on the position of Russia and China?" The truth is, David Petraeus responded to this question and said, "Be careful of an important point. You must know that the Russians will not intervene in this war, no matter what. They want to support Iran in any way. The Russians are bogged down in the war in Ukraine more than you can imagine. And this limits their ability to help any ally, even Iran. So, for example, he wants to help Iran, but he won't be able to. The military withdrawal of the Russian army towards Ukraine is very difficult. And today, for example, you are talking about France, Germany, and Britain wanting to carry out a landing operation in Ukraine, a military landing of their forces. I just read news that France sent Hammer bombs, sent them in record numbers to Ukraine. So you are talking about military pressures in Ukraine that prevent Russia from intervening in Iran. And it will not be able to help it in the way Iran wants. What about China? He said, "Well, China, in his opinion, is that China will sit and monitor the situation. And it will see its outcomes. And according to those outcomes, it will deal." I'm sorry, I'll add this answer from myself. I think this answer is a bit late, or maybe a bit advanced. Why? First, you are talking about China's behavior not being the same as before the 12th day. And China is not monitoring. China has become active in the Iran war, evidenced by its release of images of F-22 Raptor fighter jets in Israel. Evidence that it sent a spy ship to monitor American movements. Evidence that there is news coming out that air defense systems have been sent from China to Iran, and you don't know if this is accurate or if it has arrived. But I don't think China is just sitting and monitoring. China might be active. Am I correcting David Petraeus? I am not correcting, but I am telling you that the article might be a bit old. So the information that has recently come out says that China is active in the Iran war, not just sitting and monitoring and seeing the outcomes. The part about seeing the outcomes or the results of the war, I might agree with that. One way or another, China will sit and watch how this war ends.

Ravi Agrawal asked David Petraeus, "So, which militia do you think is more likely to move to support Iran? Is it Hezbollah, the Houthis, or the Shiite militias in Iraq?" He said, "When you look, you will find the latest news coming out." This is David Petraeus answering. He said, "Look, you will find the latest news coming out that America has withdrawn non-essential personnel from Lebanon. This means that US intelligence has prior knowledge that Hezbollah might move. And this means that America might target the Supreme Leader because Hezbollah said, 'We will not move unless the Iranian regime is overthrown.' So America is securing itself and withdrawing its non-essential employees from Lebanon. This is an indication that America might feel there is a danger from Hezbollah. And be careful, news came out a few hours ago that Israel is heavily striking Hezbollah and its depots. This means that the party remains the most dangerous player that America and Israel fear."

Ravi Agrawal said, "What about the Shiite militias in Iraq?" He said, "No, be careful. The Shiite militias in Iraq. We have special forces in Iraq." He thinks so. There are American special forces that can deal with these militias, and these militias are no longer as strong as before, and America can confront them or deal with them in one way or another, or this is what I inferred from David Petraeus's words.

The last question Ravi Agrawal, the editor-in-chief of Foreign Policy, asked David Petraeus was, "The American President Donald Trump was criticizing the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, in which you played a role. He was saying that many Americans were killed in these wars and all of that. Do you think the US military is currently better prepared than for the invasion of Afghanistan and the invasion of Iraq?" David Petraeus said, "By the way, the invasion of Iraq was not a failure. It was not bad. On the contrary, the US military had estimated that we would need 250,000 soldiers, while we could accomplish the operation with 170,000 or 130,000 soldiers. This is what we actually needed, and the operation was going well. As for whether the US military is currently prepared or not, you are making an incorrect comparison because we are talking about a land invasion here. But in Iran, you will not need a land invasion, and he does not believe that the American president will send troops on the ground. And by the way, David Petraeus says that the US military can do many things in Iran. The only thing it cannot do in Iran is overthrow the regime with air strikes. The US military will not be able to overthrow the regime in Iran. Look how much. He said this part, the US military will not be able to do it. But in comparison to the war in Afghanistan and the war in Iraq, he sees it as an inappropriate comparison regarding the readiness of the US military. He does not know the situation on the ground now regarding the US military, but apparently, he sees that this operation could be a powerful operation, not a limited operation.

Finally, not least, the whole story is currently in luck. This is David Petraeus's opinion, or this is the sentence he wanted to end with. He said, "Luck will be a very important player. Why? Iran is not Venezuela. Iran, you are talking about a country that has missiles and many American targets in front of it. If luck is on its side, a missile manages to hit an American compound, America explodes, an American plane that needed maintenance crashes, an American pilot is captured. Luck will be on Iran's side, and it will be a black day for America. But if Iran has no luck, and luck is still on the side of the US military under Donald Trump's administration, this is about a quick and decisive war, and the Iranian regime will suffer great losses. But overthrowing the regime will not happen. David Petraeus only had one important point. He said, "Why will foreign countries not cooperate in the war with Iran? Because as long as the war with Iran is ongoing, it is not in the interest of foreign countries, and even after it ends, it is not in the interest of Gulf countries. Why? You don't know the outcomes of this war. If you weaken the Iranian regime, you don't know if terrorism might spread in Iran and then affect the Gulf countries. You don't know what the behavior of the Iranian regime will be after this war. Will it be obedient, gentle, and friendly, or will it want to draw its sword and prove itself and regain its prestige? So it will be a fierce regime. So you don't know the outcomes. So the Gulf, until the last moment, will not enter this war unless American bases in the Gulf countries are hit. Here Iran is calling on the Gulf countries, but the Gulf countries will remain keen to appear as if they are completely out of the picture. There is only one problem, and that is that Iran must target foreign countries. That is, it is written on it. First, the number of missiles it has will not be abundant enough to keep striking Israel. Second, if it wants to strike America, America is as close as possible. It will be located in foreign bases because the American bases in the Gulf will be very suitable for medium-range and short-range missiles that Iran has. In the end, I hope I have explained the matter to you in a simple way. And I hope Egypt, the Lord of the Arabs, and I hope Palestine, O Lord, long live Egypt. Peace. >>

You don't know who we are. We are the ones people come to from everywhere to see our country. We are the ones everyone looks at. We are a civilization that has been around for years, and the world doesn't know its secret. We are lightheartedness that makes the heart laugh. >> And generosity that is a benchmark. >> Bravery and chivalry that are not found elsewhere. And mercy that comes from our eyes before our hearts. >> We are a smile that opens a thousand doors. >> A delicious meal that gives our country flavor. We are the trust and the sweet memory that is never forgotten. We are a story, a story that amazes. Let our actions speak for us. God has given us a blessing that we must preserve and show to the world. Show our guests who we are. We are Egypt.