It's Not the Guns You Should Ban

Oh, one guy. Good. We'll come back to that. Should have shot him. Yep. Unless that unless that shotgun I think it was is empty. Should have shot. Look at that. No concern.

Look at the lack of any urgency in these videos. That's what bothers that's what's evil to me is a complete total lack of concern that anyone's going to stop you. Total confidence. We're gonna um go through this uh obviously what happened at Brown. There's not a whole lot of information. Here's what I would uh caution everybody. There's a lot of fake news circulating because a lot of information uh has been incorrect or it's incomplete. But we want to go through what's happened at Brown and compare the dialogue on firearms here in the United States to what happened, of course, in Australia over the weekend, which is horrible. And it's a very similar dialogue both um both actively and and what is omitted and I'm pretty sure you can spot what that is.

But Saturday uh a gunman opened fire at Brown University. This was in Rhode Island. Uh at the time of this broadcast, two people were killed and nine people injured. At Brown University, terrified students were seen running from gunfire as others barricaded themselves inside classrooms. Two students were killed and nine others injured. Police released footage of who they believe may be a person of interest. Authorities detaining a man in his 20s hours later, and we want to warn you that some images may be disturbing. Now, here here's what we do know. That one of the victims was Ella Cook, who's uh who was the vice president of the College Republicans there at the school. Um we do know that the shooter targeted a classroom. Uh the Brown president, Christina Paxton, said that she had no idea what was going on. President, with all due respect, 6 hours after this shooting and you said you don't know what what was going on in that classroom, how does that happen? Were they taking an exam? Were they meeting for a club? I don't know. I don't know. 6 hours later and you're the president and you don't know. I do not know. Well, that's kind of concerning. Yeah. That one person of interest, by the way, too, you're seeing this online, people acting as though they know uh was released. Yeah. That's pretty much all we know at this point.

And what we also know is that the left of course is moving for gun control, blaming the guns for this naturally. And it's important to note that uh Rhode Island is a pretty strict gun control state. So from I believe it's Mom Moms Demand Action in every town, those nonprofits, they actually give Rhode Island an A minus. It's ranked 13th in the nation. So if people want to attribute this to lacks gun laws, they're picking the wrong place. And like I've told you in the past, 94% that's the low end. 94% of mass shootings take place in gun-free zones. Uh obviously schools uh are are included in that category. And a place like Australia, the entire country is pretty much a gun-free zone. So you do need to look for the through line. You do need to look for the constant. And the constant is not uh lacks gun laws. The constant isn't even by the way guns themselves. We've had plenty of mass maulings with cars. Uh we've had plenty of mass stabbings in the UK. So I don't want to lead you uh astray here. We don't have a lot of information and I I do hope that u obviously the families are still able to find some some peace and are supported by those around them as they go into Christmas. It's just awful. Yeah, it's a terrible situation and that's that's the real tragedy. But the the fact that we don't have a lot of information right now is also kind of part of the the weirdness of this. Like all the cameras, they talked about that before. People have said that 6 hours later they don't know what just like why were they in the classroom on this date at this time. Just kind of basic information that they don't have that they're not releasing. I'm not saying that means anything. It just is kind of weird, right? You know, and so a lot of people right now, that's that's what we see. The the internet will go in and just fill in the gaps and usually not the right way. Like this guy getting, you know, pinged by the FBI and his face picture being plastered everywhere as a suspect and then being released. I'm like, okay, well, now he's got a lawsuit.

Australia. Um, let's be really clear about uh what has taken place here. I want to make sure you can check all the references and what is being proposed from the left in response. Here's what we do know that a lot of people obviously were killed. There was a mass shooting and Australia has banned guns by and large and has imported Muslims to a degree that is unseen before, certainly in modern history. They have done that. They've just had another mass shooting. They will propose more gun restrictions. That's what they're proposing right now. and uh clamping down on hate speech, right-wing extremism. This is how you know that your governments aren't looking out for you. This is how you know that there is political theater at play. Saying that right-wing extremism or hate speech has any bearing on this is dishonest. And as a matter of fact, it it doesn't stand it can't pass the reason test at all. Same thing with gun bans saying we need more strict gun control. You really can't get all that much more strict. So uh everyone knows this is what I would point to. Islam in the west has one goal and this shooting has been very much in line with that goal. It's a complete takeover. That's the goal.

Islam did not come to coexist. Islam what Islam and Islam is raised high and nothing is we can't think of Islam that came to live with these other religions in the sense that Islam is a religion amongst those religions and they have a share with the truth and they have a share of justice and they have a share of you know this worship of Allah the correct worship of Allahhana Islam came to correct all of that Islam came to remove the oppression of all those religions and it is the only truth and it is the only way to justice.

Everything that guy just said is Yep. Just to be clear, uh it's not the only truth. I would argue it's a lie. It's not the only way to justice. It has a two-tier justice system for Muslims and for everyone else. Um and I think that the idea that Muhammad is the holiest of prophets, peace be upon him, I think is straight from the pit of hell according to the Bible that I read. And I'm not going to shy away from that. I never have. Certainly not going back to 2009 publicly. You cannot claim to be a Christian and believe that there is any more overwhelmingly evil force in the world today than Islam. It subverts everything that we believe and seeks to delegitimize it. And if you disagree, you are at risk of being killed by those who disagree with you. So hopefully that helps set some context. If you have any questions as to where I stand, you can ask below. you can comment, but I believe I've been crystal clear.

Two gunmen, father and son, attacked specifically a Hanukkah celebration. Uh I think it was Hanukkah by the beach in Sydney, Australia. Police were called to Bondi Beach around 6:45 p.m. last night after multiple reports of active shooters. Two men were firing into crowds of people celebrating the start of Hanukkah at a park in North Bondi. What you really hopefully notice is the lack of concern.

One guy. Good. We'll come back to that. Should have shot him. Yep. Unless that unless that shotgun I think it was is empty. Should have shot. Look at that. No concern. That's pretty quick, too, by the way. Yeah. Yeah, not his first time. Nope. Semi-automatic could not be less relevant when no one else can defend themselves. Oh my god. Unchallenged. They know it. Until that one guy. Till one guy. yeah. Yeah, they got him.

So, here's what we do know. that uh 15 people were killed, 26 people were hospitalized. Uh again, as of the time of this broadcast, these numbers can change. The shooters were uh father and son uh Sajjid and Navidiv Aram. Sajjid arrived in Australia in 1998 in a student visa. Naveiv was born uh in Australia in 2001. Navidid Aram was already known to some uh security personnel in Australia since 2019 over an Islamic State plot. Later was deemed to not be a threat. We don't have the answers as to why. Some of the some in some cases people have said that these suspects have been linked to an Islamic State terror group. They found ISIS flags in the car. The guns used bolt-action rifle, shotgun. Um, apparently they were obtained through some kind of hunting or gun club license. Here's how they were stopped. This is 100% of the time. Bad guys with a gun are stopped by a good guy with a gun. Yeah. takes himself out with a gun, in which case there's sort of a a temporary, you know, transformation of the gun to a good guy gun because he's taking himself out. So, that's one thing you need to keep in mind, right? There are millions of guns in the United States. There are hundreds of thousands to millions of defensive uses of firearms every single year. They save far more lives than they take. 94% of shootings take place in gun-free zones. And invariably, bad guys with a gun are stuffed by good guys with guns. Uh, father's dead, son was shot, but lived. From what we understand thus far, some reports say that the father-son duo misunderstood the meaning of a Hanukkah father-son shootout. I love you, Dad. Yes, I know you're saying we shouldn't do that, but uh here's the thing. It's a It's a depressing day otherwise. Also, that's what I wanted to see. Yeah, I should tell you one bystander did share what they saw and it's harrowing. And as soon as they saw me, they came bounding over. It's a penal colony. They're a different Yeah, that's they're just weird people.

So that's all the information. Check the references. So what is the response from the government in Australia? Well, of course it's we need to crack down on guns more. Jeez. The Australian prime minister said the government is prepared to take whatever action is necessary, including indeed is the need for tougher gun laws. Tougher gun laws. What? It's not a gun law. This is a gun law. This is a gun law. Y'all said the evil scourge of anti-semitism must be eradicated. Great. Why do you keep importing Muslims? Well, that's those aren't they're not anti-semitic or anything. No, no, no. They're not known. It's not like they say like we respect the people of the book except the Jews. They lie about everything. Yes. And we must kill them. Going back to the beginning. Yeah. They're kosher, you know.

So, they have to deal with guns, with anti-semitism. And of course, uh not the least of these issues is those pesky anti-semitic guns. Well, see, that one is a given to me. Like I'm I'm as sec a as you get. But if if it is designed to be an anti-semitic gun, that does seem like it's a different category. You have to get rid of those. Yeah. Yeah. I think get rid of those. It says Jew. Yeah. It's under a blue flag law. Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. And then to top it all off because he's looking out for the people, right? Father son Islamic duo who wanted an Islamic state had ISIS flags taking out a Hanukkah party. Well, we also have to look at dealing with some right-wing extremism that's really at play here. We take Asia's advice uh very seriously. We work closely with them. We receive regular updates as well. Uh the uh director general of Asia has warned about a range of uh threats uh be it uh any anti-semitism uh the rise of right-wing extremist groups as well. and we continue to work closely with our security agencies. So, are you referring to Islam as a right-wing extremist group, right? The the left is incapable of being logical. I think the answer is yes to your question. Yeah. They see anything religious, right, as rightwing. Yeah. I say anything that they don't like as rightwing. Oh, somebody was violent that was rightwing. Well, their initial statement didn't really even broach the subject of Islam. And let me tell you this, you will never eradicate crime. You will never eradicate gun violence as seen here. The great act of evil is barring people from protecting themselves. Yes. Barring people from being able to protect their family. This shooting absolutely would have been stopped by some good guys with guns very quickly. And I and and I'll prove it to you. I I will prove to you how ineffective this has been because you need to keep in mind pointed to the buyback mandatory buyback in Australia. They were a talking point for a long time. Canada was at one point. Then they saw some gun crime. Australia, now they're going to go, "Oh, well, you know what? It wasn't strict enough." Just like socialism, they keep moving the goalposts until they have to move them again. So, let's go through some claims here from the left so that you're you're actually equipped to deal with it. Their first claim is that uh more gun laws somehow would have prevented the tragedy. This uh this is really just one of those uh terrible, terrible, horrific uh types of of shootings that um I folks in Australia think that that there's not much chance of these kinds of things happening because the country has uh such strict gun laws. Yeah. And people saying if they had more though, so here's the truth. Um the gun laws did not help and they're not going to. Like I said, 94% of mass shootings occur in gun-free zone. Okay. They are targets. To be clear, pretty much all of Australia is a gun-free zone. Yep. Strictest gun laws arguably of anywhere. So, let me give you a few examples. You need a license. Each gun needs its own permit. You have to show quote genuine need to obtain a firearm. And by the way, that does not include personal protection, which is the primary purpose of a firearm. That's why the Second Amendment is not for hunting. You have to have unbelievably strict storage requirements that render it useless for personal protection with regular audits. There's a firearm registry both for ownership and for sales and uh where Bondi Beach is located. Of course, there is no carrying whatsoever as a civilian and semi-automatic firearms are pretty much banned, right? So, this is what you always see with the assault weapons ban. It's, oh, it's a magazine capacity. Oh, it needs a bullet button. Then it's, oh, we don't want semi-automatic rifles, which means one trigger pull, one round. So, you know what? will allow bolt actions and things like lever actions, you know, nonself reloading guns for sporting or hunting purposes because that'll that that'll make everyone safe. No one can just go out and carry carry out a mass shooting. Here's the thing. I understand that you wouldn't want a lever action or a pump uh gun in most cases if you are going into war where other people have semi-automatic rifles. It's no longer relevant when you know that there's nobody else with any type of gun whatsoever. Bolt action is plenty fast. The guns that are allowed for sporting purposes are plenty fast. And people who are going to carry out mass shootings can use whatever they want. Look at the lack of any urgency in these videos. That's what bother that's what's evil to me is a complete total lack of concern that anyone's going to stop you. Total confidence. You wouldn't get that in the United States. Maybe in places like New York or Chicago. Yeah. Place like Texas, Florida. Someone's going to have their head in a swivel. So, let me show you. Let's break this down. Here is the shooter firing the, you know, more safe, non-mass shooting friendly uh boltaction rifle, which should just be used for sporting purposes. See that? He's acquiring target fast, too. Yeah. Not his first time, right? So, this is this is predicated on the idea that, oh, a semi-automatic rifle is what makes a mass shooting possible. Um, okay, look guys, I'll show you. That's a boltaction. You know, I've talked about this, a lever action rifle. These same thing would not be self- reloading. You could absolutely carry out a mass shooting. As a matter of fact, it's certainly easier to carry out a mass shooting with a bolt action or with a lever action if no one else has a gun than if you have a semi-automatic and people even just have pistols. You have any idea, by the way, it's not loaded, how fast It's that that fast. As fast as you can work that action, you can get that in Australia for sporting purposes. Mhm. You want to see how fast these things can be used if you think you're safe by banning. And that's what they do. The Assault Weapons Ban Act was banning things like semi-automatics and magazines because gosh, that'll slow them down. Here's how fast someone can use these guns. Safe is in your mother's arms if a criminal grabs one. And then people will often say, "Oh, wait a second. You think that a good guy with a gun is going to stop stop them?" Yes. You think your little handgun is going to stop someone with a high-powered rifle? Absolutely. Let me show you how. This one man was stopped. Unfortunately, he wasn't murdered. Headlock. Great work, too, by the way. Mhm. I I think he might have been out cuz it looked like he was trying to shoot or something. He was making some weird motions. I'm I'm hoping that he was he was out and he wasn't hesitating because he was concerned about the fact that uh he could be arrested. I'm I'm hoping that's what the case is. So people say, "Hey, you think you're going to stop them?" Yeah. Hey, if you can put a shooter in a headlock, you can shoot them with a handgun. Okay, let me give you an example right here. This is the least amount of gun. A little Keltech 32. Just so people can see. It's obviously unloaded. Okay, this is the least. This is my when I don't have a gun gun. That's what that is. Headlock. You do that from 20 ft away. You can do it from 30t away. If you can get to him with a headlock, you don't think you can put bang bang 1, two, three. Is anyone saying it's ideal? No. If you can put a shooter in a headlock and disarm him, better case scenario would be shoot him, blow him away.

10 minutes earlier. 10 minutes earlier. Yep. I mean, or or even more, I forget how long they said this went on, but uh it it was a while. And here's the thing, we don't know if this is completely true. We know how long it took. I think it was 10 minutes or so. Um, sometimes police response time, I don't know if you know this. Does everyone here agree that, uh, a shooting can take place in a split second? Yeah. Uh, yeah, absolutely. Right. They usually do. Yes. I mean, mass shootings are a little different, but most shootings are over in a couple seconds, right? And if someone has a gun, right, a bullet, you're talking about a split second leaving that rifle and hitting you. Yeah. I don't know if you know this, police response time is often more. It's often longer than a split second. And it's particularly relevant here because relying on the cops may be what resulted in uh these people being able to go completely confident, unfettered for minutes at a time. There was a witness who said there were police officers there. We can't confirm this, but that they were scared and didn't do a whole lot. Simple as that. 20 minutes was four policemen there. Nobody give fire back. Nothing. like they are froze like for it look like 20 minutes like and they shoot the guy change magazine. I look at him all the time. I was two of my babies under me and I look at that and he's just rifle and and a pistol and just shoot and the other one was under that start to come close to the audience. One of I think one of the the people come took his rifle and shoot him. That's one of them. That's what I saw. I didn't know how much I saw, but who were they targeting? Oh, all the crowd. Anyone. It's insane. And by the way, two people with a handgun or three people with a handgun, one, you know, each having a handgun is still a huge advantage in many ways over one guy with a rifle. Yeah. Well, think the right guy, the right one guy with a pistol, even if you miss, even if you miss and you just distract one of these guys. Now, I mean, you know, we talked about seconds. Like I hate to say this, but seconds do count in situations like this. Getting to cover and understanding where the threat is coming from and making sure that you're not the next person on the list. All you have to do is somebody shoots at them and now their head is on a swivel. Now they're wondering, okay, who's going to come up behind me. I can't just sit here and pick people off one by one because they might get shot from behind. And this poor guy, you know, he's he's being a good dad. Yeah. Or or grandfather, whatever. I think you said his children. Um he looked pretty old though, maybe his grand, but he he was on top of kids. Yeah. Protecting kids. You can do that. Yeah. You know what would be better? Not having to just be on top of your kids, but being able to return fire. That's what I'm saying. Yeah. Yeah. Think about that. If any of those people holding the cameras were holding guns instead, they had perfect angles. That's exactly right. Yeah. The guy that was like, "Oh, they got him." Yeah. Oh, they got him. Oh, they got him. Great. Finally, somebody has some balls. Oh, and look, the commercial's over. Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. They got him. Thank god we didn't have any guns. Yeah. Think about and their solution is to make this worse. Ah, we don't want guns in we don't want guns here in Australia. Let's wait for the for the guards with guns. Wait for the cops with guns. You hope. Who, by the way, I don't know what it's like in Australia, but in the United States, they fire on average 50 rounds a year. Year. Yeah. A year. And they weren't around. Pretty much everyone in this office does more than that. Uh, probably a week if you were to average it out. Every time we go to the range, it's a few hundred if not a thousand rounds. So this idea that the police, it's like the film where they're able to to shoot the balls off a nat at 50 yards. No, no. What you need is to give them something to deal with. Give them something to guess. And you know what it it's like this. Hey, two people boxing, two people punching, right? Fighting. Okay, maybe it's a tossup, assuming everything else being equal. One person has his hands tied behind his back. You think the other person's concerned about wailing on his face? He has nothing to defend against. That's what a gun-free zone or gun-free country is. And it's evil. It's a fundamental violation of human rights. And unfortunately, a lot of people don't think it about that. They don't think about it that way until they get to the point where they go, "Oh god. Oh god. There's nothing I can do. I am completely powerless and I hope he doesn't kill me or my children next." start thinking about it before you get to that point because a lot of people are led by the nose to a false premise which brings us to the next claim that and by the way granted a heroic man who as I understand it happens to be Muslim stopped that shooter would have been better if he'd have shot him. Uh but they're saying so so clearly obviously if one of the good guys was Islamic none of this has anything you can't blame Islam. It was a Muslim man who heroically tackled and disarmed one of the Bondi Beach shooters. Ahmed Al Ahmed's name needs to be heard and repeated for everyone to hear. The man literally ran up behind a terrorist, put him in a chokeold, wrestled the gun away from him, and saved innumerable lives. But we need to acknowledge this because with the rising levels of anti-Islamic sentiment, people want to blame Muslims. Mhm. Yeah. Here's here's the truth. Of course, we can blame the ideology of Islam. And here's the other thing. When that guy, if it was empty, fine. But he didn't shoot the shooter, right? He disarmed him. As I understand it, the shooter walked off and potentially rearmed or got back into the fray. He certainly wasn't apprehended right there. He still was unconcerned. Think about that for a second. Now, let's go through Islam. Um, in Australia, uh, the Islamic population in ' 85 was less than 100,000. Today, it's 813,000. Jeez. Oh, yeah. 813,000. Now, keep in mind, uh, if you say it's not Islam, let's ask this, why might people think it is Islam? Why might this man have an ISIS flag in his vehicle? Why might these people have been on the radar as potentially violent for a long time or a threat? Well, you may not remember this, but 198 million Muslims worldwide support the use of violence against civilian targets to defend Islam. If you were to apply that uh to the 27 million people who live in Australia, that would mean 89,000 Muslims. Jeez, in Australia alone support violence against civilians at least sometimes. That's larger than their the country's standing army. not Islam anywhere else would you say it's not the fault of the army that that carried out the mission I mean they're unrelated 198 million Muslims worldwide support violence against civilians against civilians so you're past the point of well do they mean a holy war which mean no no defend Islam against civilians meaning heretics meaning apostates what you just saw it means what you just saw means what you just saw would be supported by let's round down 80,000 Muslims in Australia to some degree or another. Now take those people and give them the confidence of knowing that the entire population is defend uh defenseless. Give them even more confidence to know that those people will willingly be subjugated and sent to quarantine camps for example during a time like CO. Australia needs to go a different direction or they have no hope. They will cease to be as a nation. Yeah. And so one of the solutions they said obviously was uh tighter gun control. And one of the reasons that he said was that oh you know people change over time. Situations change. I'm like yeah like this guy you had him under surveillance in 2019 to see if he was a threat. I believe there are reports that maybe and I and unconfirmed so we'll have to figure this out. If he did some international travel, you know, some connections to different groups. It's like so I'm supposed to believe that your tightening of the screws because situations change is going to solve the problem and you couldn't solve that one. I'm not talking about somebody just becoming mentally unstable in a way you can't really see. I'm talking about somebody being aligned ideologically to this in the first place, being under investigation and surveillance in 2019, and then potentially making some international travel. And you can't figure that one out. If only if only the left was as unforgiving of Islamists as they are of somebody who posted a racist tweet when they were a teenager. It's true. That follows you for life. Yep. Being part of the mujaheden, you people change. That's right. They're never going to fix it. It never works. It's an island. It's the perfect experiment. The absolute perfect experiment. Unless you melt down every single gun and make sure none ever, ever ever ever ever come in. This will not work. And even then, it wouldn't solve the problems that you're dealing with with violence between people. Nope. No. You'd still have weapons. I mean, you could still make bombs. You still have knives. You still have cars, buses, trains to steal. They'll figure it out. It's Australia. You could train crocodiles for crying out loud. Everything there is dangerous. Crocky, you could. Yes, you could. And by the way, best way to stay in touch because this is one of those things you can see the throttling taking place on places like uh YouTube. Uh a lot of social media. Download the Rumble app. Follow me there. You don't have to live in those social media ghettos where the algorithm tells you what they want you to see. Uh next claim that you will see regarding Australia is that well actually mo most Muslims in Australia are good. So, it's just Islamophobic. Uh, Pierce Morgan, oh, Pierce, posted this response to Tommy Robinson, uh, about he said, "You would have wanted Ahmed deported when he came back to Australia from Syria." Yeah. Sorry, that's a little bit Australian because I'm in the mood. Um, here's the thing. Yes. But also the shooters. Yeah. More importantly, Yeah. the guys who are under investigation. Yeah. Yeah. Here's the truth. Um, sure there are some Muslims who can be good Samaritans. I get that. And sure, there can be plenty of Muslims who do good things. And sure, there can be plenty of Muslims who um act in a way that is the equivalent of anathema to the Islamic ideology. I know I'm mixing terms there. If they are more secular and they don't, for example, want to kill all infidels. Uh, it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter. Muslims don't belong in Western civilization as they seek to subvert it. They don't. I'm getting pretty close to the point where they have to actively denounce it to be in our borders. They have to actively denounce it to be in our borders. Yeah. Religious freedom. We don't allow all religions. We don't allow cults. We don't allow cults that are death cults. We don't allow cults that sacrifice people. We don't allow cults in this country or gangs that expressly outline the murder of an entire group of people. That's illegal. I think Islam gets really close. I think I I think it's really close. My source, the Quran. Another source exactly what they are preaching in mosques in Australia. You can't take away from the fact first and foremost that jihad is definitely part of our dein. And as Muslims, we should never ever shy away from this. But Allah has preferred the mujah over those who remain with a great reward. And allahel prefers those who go out and fight in his path. And he prefers them over those who sit idle. No solution other than jihad. Continues until judgement day. Jihad is the only solution when it comes to infidels. These are just, by the way, just examples in Australia. What do you think would happen in the States if you had a church praising McVey? What do you think would happen if you had a church basically surrounding the the Bundy ranch which was a dispute over uh I believe it was largely mineral rights or land rights? I mean we saw what happened in Waco and they actually weren't even hurting anybody. You could argue that it was argue it was a cult. You could argue that what they were doing there was immoral. Absolutely. But they also weren't out there encouraging the defense of something that's not under attack. Right. Right. You have to What do you mean the the only solution to what? Well, here's the thing. Who's doing anything to you? That's what jihad is. Jihad is a spiritual war, right? Jihad, they will say, "Well, it means spiritual war." Okay. Well, is that outlined? Yes, it is. Anywhere that Islam does not dominate, anywhere that is not an Islamic society requires subjugation. Jihad means it's a constant struggle. That's what it is. Imagine any Christian church in this country saying killing all, waging war against anyone who is Christian. Just imagine take take a preacher a southern preacher and ANYONE WHO DOESN'T ACCEPT CHRIST THEY ARE YOUR ENEMY. YOU WILL GIVE THEM A CHANCE TO ACCEPT CHRIST AND IF THEY DON'T YOU WILL KILL THEM. YOU WILL FOLLOW THEM FROM SEA TO SEA ATLANTIC TO PACIFIC. GEE, THE MURDER IS TERRIFIC. YOU WILL MURDER EVERY SINGLE LAST PERSON WHO REJECTS CHRIST. IT'S THE ONLY WAY TO DEAL WITH NON-CHRISTIANS IN THIS COUNTRY. AND WE WILL DO IT UNTIL THE DAY OF JUDGMENT WHEN THE HORSEMEN COME BACK. UNTIL THEN, KILL EVERY SINGLE LAST NON-CHRISTIAN IF THEY DO NOT CONVERT. PRAISE BE TO JESUS GOD. IF YOU heard that in this country, now do it at thousands of churches. You think that'd be allowed? Now go down to your local mosque. Go ahead, clip it out of context, people. I dare you. Think it would be tolerated for a second? No. I just swept I just swapped Muhammad Allah for Jesus and God. That's the kind of sermon they get. We don't need anyone who subscribes to that ideology, that religion in the West. We don't. We just had two other Islamic terrorists kill uh National Guardsmen in DC. I mean, this happens all the time. Yeah. All the time. And we try and act like, well, most of them, well, sure, most of them are good. If you had a church that preached that, most members still wouldn't go out and kill people because they would be afraid. It doesn't mean that they are unsupportive of the idea. 198 million Muslims worldwide what I just presented to you as a sermon. If you had 30 million Americans who subscribed to that, for crying out loud, we had people on IRS targeting lists, auditing lists for parent teacher conferences, for going to Tea Party protests, and we act like this is remotely acceptable because we are the world. Well, as you say, we are the world and coexist. They specifically preach do not coexist. Yeah, that's it. We have to make a decision now. I I think it needs to be renounced. I think absolutely. I mean, we've just for some reason after 9/11, for some reason, we just got to the point where we're like, "Oh, I guess it's not uh I guess it's not politically correct to call this out anymore." Like, we can't have the conversation. Again, one of those moments where the left tells us what we can and can't say and talk about. We can't say that this is even radical Islam, which a lot of us took offense to. It's like, well, you don't have to really be that radical. This is Islam. You can just say that. But even radical Islam, like their goal is not to come in and be a part. Their goal is to come in and overthrow. We've never allowed that either. No. No. Matter what it comes in under the veil of, religion or otherwise. You can't come in and plot to destroy our culture and fundamentally change what this nation is. Why are we not allowed to have that conversation anymore? Why are we not seeing politicians and leaders call it out for what it is? Not against all Muslim people. Like you said, most of the people that heard that sermon would not be going out in the streets, but we wouldn't be saying that after the fifth or sixth attack. Well, but most of them are nice. Yeah, but some of them aren't. Okay. And it's an ideology problem. Can we deal with the root cause of this issue, please? Here's what you do. Here's a test. Okay. Let's just say so you don't want to ban all Muslims. All right. Let's start with this. Yes. Sakim, do you reject jihad? Do you reject the concept of jihad? Do you reject the spiritual principle of jihad? Anyone who doesn't answer yes emphatically to all gets their deportation papers. That's where I line up 100%. Let's go on. Here's really before we do, there was some late kind of breaking stuff about the son. Apparently, they're now reporting that he was associated with a Sydneybased Islamic cell, uh, Islamic State cell. It's like, oh, okay, I get it. So, the government's going to be able to far all this stuff out. You don't need guns because we're going to go in and make sure that these things don't happen. Except it did. Yeah. And it was somebody born in your country. So all of your safeguards mentally and a guy that was there for almost 30 years or maybe just a little over 30 years, just 27 years, that that's the guy. Yeah. Good luck. Good luck stopping it without a gun to protect yourself. Good luck. You know what? And yes, it's relevant, but I almost don't want to spend time on it because I don't want people to think, well, that should be the threshold. Get the montage ready again. Here's my threshold just as a starting point. And anyone who disagrees with this to me uh is not a friend of western civilization of Christian society. Let's play that montage of the imams just in Australia. We can't take away from the fact first and foremost that jihad is definitely part of our dein. And as Muslims, we should never ever shy away from this. But Allah has preferred the mujah over those who remain with a great reward. And allahel prefers those who go out and fight in his path. And he prefers them over those who sit idle. No solution other than jihad for the sake of Allah. Jihad continues until judgment day. Jihad for the sake of Allah is the only solution when it comes to the Okay. So, anyone in attendance there, I would be out with an entire unit and a clipboard. Hey, you attend this place regularly? Yeah. What did you think of the uh of the message? And anyone who responds with any words other than I was uh absolutely shocked. I think it's aborant and I will never be back again and I am converting to Christianity. Any response outside of that is okay. Thank you. Right this way. And they're out of the country. Oh, you're still here and you're still watching this on YouTube. You've probably noticed something is missing by now. I'm not here. That's because the Live Daily Show is now streaming exclusively on Rumble weekdays at 11:00 a.m. Eastern. Tune in there where nothing is censored.