Transcription
Like how much power does the president have? You can't even tell BB to go away.
Some guy runs a tiny little weird ethnostate in the Middle East. You can get out of here. No, you can't come in the White House. I mean, I think it's way deeper than that. And I don't think it's just about Israel. It's evil disguised as good. It's it really is a binary. Are you in the side of killing and hurting? Are you in the side of uniting and healing? That's it.
Tucker Carlson recently went on the Hodgej Twins podcast and exposed Israel's endgame, not only in the Middle East, but also among the American public, a public whose sentiments are shifting directly away from Israel at a time in which our government is more attached to Israel than ever. As the United States launches wars for Israel's benefit, their territorial advantage, it might come back to bite them in the butt, so to speak. And Tucker Carlson breaks this down. What are the repercussions of this? How does Israel intend to mitigate these circumstances? Well, he gets into it here. Let's check it out. Please like the video, subscribe to the channel, and hype it if you can.
What do you think the endgame is? I mean, okay, they started this this bombing campaign against Iran. I mean, but what's the goal? I mean, are they actually do Israel and the Zionists and the military industry? Do they actually think Israel is going to one day control Iran? Well, the the goal is destruction and dominance, of course, and it's dominance by destruction. So, the goal is to destroy Russia and to break it up into a bunch of different republics.
The goal is to destroy Iran and do the same thing. The goal is to keep the rest of the Levant, you know, the the area surrounding Israel in chaos and bloodshed, disorganization. They can dominate it. And the goal is to do that to Europe and to the United States, as far as I can tell, but certainly to Europe. They hate Europe. And they've always hated Europe. They say they hate Europe. Everyone in Europe seems unaware of this. It's like, no, they hate you actually, which is one of the reasons that they convinced the Biden administration to blow up Europe's main energy source, Nordstream 2. And it's a massive upside from the Iran war from their perspective, the NEOCon perspective, is that it starves Europe of energy and it's destroying. I mean, Europe is collapsing right now. Germany lost 10% of its industrial capacity last month. So this is like moving toward great depression stuff going on in Europe in addition to the migrant stuff which has transformed Europe into something less than it was. That of course was also pushed by the neocon. So like people are not seeing this clearly. Destruction and then domination are clearly the goals. This is not a group that's ever built anything like at all. Like zero zero. I mean tr I mean and and ask some uh I mean take a look at the people who pushed this stuff.
John Bolton who's the former national security adviser for Trump in the first term. Does John Bolton have a vision of building? No. Does Mark Tissson have a vision of building? No. These people are wholly about destruction, blowing stuff up, taking out the tyrant. Okay. And then what what do you build in its place? Something beautiful? No. They're incapable of.
Yeah. That's so well put. There's never any rebuilding effort. And if there is, it's to try to suit a puppet regime as what happened in Iraq under Chalib and under forces that you know were Iranian assets. That's what advantage the United States gained out of this. So I'm with Tucker that for Israel's ambitions in the Middle East, it depends on two things, destruction and domination. They didn't exactly care what kind of regime emerged to fill the void left by the Assad regime at the end of 2024 when that regime finally fell after a shadow war by the CIA, a wave of escalations under both Obama and Trump, etc. Even if it meant the al-Qaeda guy, they prefer the al-Qaeda Sunni head chopper who fought US forces in Iraq and founded al-Qaeda's affiliate in Syria to Assad. And just as in Iran, they don't care what kind of regime would fill the void left by the Ayatollas in the Iranian Republic if it was to fall, which it's not, by the way. The whole war was backward and idiotic. They just care about destabilizing the Middle East so that they can reign supreme as the superpower. And not only that, but let's just be a parasite on the United States and use their treasury to do it. Let's use their soldiers to do it. Let's use their weaponry and their intelligence to do it, not the IDF. That is the grand strategy. But they're going to run into roadblocks here in the future where even the powerful Israel lobby might not be able to be a counterweight against the masses of American people that want nothing to do with these policies anymore. This war is more unpopular than ever. Trump and the Republican party are going to feel that in not only the midterms but likely the 2028 election, leaving you with a total losing hand. If this was a poker hand, you'd have a deuce seven offshoot and there'd be no pair on the board. That's the kind of hand that's being dealt by the neocons and Zionists and embraced by all the worst super villains and bloodthirsty maniacs imaginable. Building something beautiful. They're incapable of wanting to build something beautiful because they're the enemies of beauty and of truth. This is like evil in a way that these are not foreign policy disagreements. These are this is a clash of worldviews. Is your job on earth to tell the truth and create beauty and to love other people including your enemies. That's the Christian view. This is a non-Christian view. It's a pagan view and it's an evil view.
It's vanism, right? I don't know that it's Zionism. I mean, I think it's way deeper than that. And I don't think it's just about Israel. I mean, I [clears throat] intentionally gave an example of two famous neocons who were not Jewish because I want to be clear that this is not about all Jewish people, right? I mean, I have I have a number of Jewish friends who I think are 100% on board with my view of this. They agree with me.
I talked to Glenn Greenwald this morning from Brazil who I think I doubt he disagrees with the word I'm saying. So, it's not it's not about whether they're Jewish or not or Zionist or not. I think it's way deeper. I actually think that's I mean, yeah, of course I'm totally opposed to Zionism. It's insane. What? Some Eastern Europeans have a right to some plot of land thousands of miles away cuz why? It doesn't make any sense. So, yeah, I'm opposed. But I don't really think that's Zionism is just one manifestation of something deeper. This is evil. Whenever you see a movement dedicated to destroying, we can say that's Satan's team. Okay? So, you want to be on the side that does what God did when he made the world, which is creating, building, unifying, loving. Like, it's it really is a binary. Are you on the side of killing and hurting? Are you on the side of uniting and healing? That's it. Building, destroying, killing, healing. And I would I see it in those terms. And you know, people pretend that they have motives that they don't actually have. But if you look at the fruits, I they've never had a neoonservative foreign policy adventure that did anything creative positive. All of them were dedicated to killing people. Absolutely correct. My entire lifetime has been consumed with these neocon foreign policy projects from Iraq to Afghanistan to Libya to Syria to Yemen to Somalia continuing to bombing bomb Somalia right now to Nigeria to the intervention in Ukraine. None of them have borne fruit for the American public whatsoever. Those wars are designed to feed the territorial ambitions of Israel, entangling alliances that are disastrous but happen to provide lucrative money flows to JP Morgan and Bank of America and Loheed Martin and Boeing. That's what they exist for. Tucker's also right about some of the advocates for these preposterous Zionist schemes, many of which come from, I hate to say, the evangelical Christians. And I put Christians loosely because Christianity doesn't call for mass murder to suit the needs of a foreign genocidal state and their ambitions for that region whatsoever. But it is the Lindsey Grahams and the John McCain's and the George W. Bushes and Dick Cheneys in my lifetime just as much as it has been the Richard Pearls and the Paul Wolawitz's and the Norman Pod Horitzes that have urged the these kind of conflicts. never bears fruit for the public. In fact, completely to the detriment of the public. And if there's one thing that the whole political zeitgeist is united on, it's against foreign wars. It's what led so many people to support Trump in the first place, at least his rhetoric on those issues in 2016. Of course, he's completely turned away from that. I would argue even in the first term escalating wars in Syria and uh and Yemen and also ramping up the bombing in Afghanistan before to his credit trying to wind down that conflict in his first term. So no matter who you elect in Washington, you get John McCain. But finally the American people are seeing through the wool that's been pulled over their eyes when it comes to Israel. And I hope that it does bear fruit eventually. Right now it's not. We're not feeling any political manifestation in it but hopefully eventually.
And then not rebuilding. So that tells you a lot. We were in Afghanistan for 20 years. What do we leave behind? Shipping containers and concertino wire. We never built anything. So you know just just on the basis of that fact alone it's evil. That's evil because evil destroys.
Right creates. Like I don't like to mix uh religion with opin because it gets all you know it gets confusing. There is warnings in our Bible that you're referring to and it referred to it as uh the synagogue of Satan.
Mhm. And it it rings from. That's that's a term that's in um the book of Revelation written by John in the alopatmos. And you know I'm not really sure what that means but I mean I think you could I'm not I'm hardly a theologian never going to be one.
Right? But I think you could you could understand it even in like human terms. Which is you will often see people come to you in the guise of liberators. I'm here to make your life better. And in fact, they're actually doing just the opposite. So, I think maybe the way to think about it is you have a a synagogue, a religious institution designed to worship God and do good that is actually doing bad. And I see that all around me. You know, whatever it is they're trying to get you to do that will kill you. They tell you it's liberating you. I don't know. Hate your husband and you'll be liberated by feminism. Kill your baby and you'll be liberated by abortion. Bomb Iran and you'll be liberated from the threat of the Iranian nuclear program. Blow up southern Lebanon and we'll be safe. Everyone is exactly the same lie. It's evil disguised as good.
Right? And so that's kind of how I understand it. Again, I mean, I understand the stuff as a child understands it. Not in a very sophisticated way, but.
Right. I see that all around me.
Yeah. It's hard impossible to miss that all around us. This Zionist cult based on death and destruction and really the illegitimate creation of Israel from the get-go, a centrally planned country supported mostly by a globalist land redistribution scheme, you know, with Britain and the United States spearheading it. That's what Israel's always been. It's led to the mass displacement of people and thievery. Zionism's downstream from the worst atrocities in mankind just perpetuating it under a different ideology. And Tucker Carlson mentioned the synagogue of Satan. They talked about that a little bit. I can add some context here. Um I think that term is used twice in Revelation. Indeed, John wrote that book and it described Jewish leaders in the cities of Smyrna and Philadelphia. The Jewish congregants that rose up against the Christians denounced them trying to get them to turn away from Christ and to follow the allowed law that Christ actually fulfilled through his life and his death and his resurrection. That's what it pertains to by my understanding. Of course, there's lots of interpretations of lots of things in regard to that text, especially the book of Revelation, but that's how I see it is Jewish congregants that were trying to turn Christians away from Christ even after Christ proved to be the martyr called for and prophesized by the old law.
I think a majority of the problems that the United States have right now is affiliation with Israel and their hatred. And you pointed this out at Amfest that especially with the Republican conservative, I found that they have a real hatred for Muslim people.
Yeah. Well, I'm not participating in that and I'm not a Muslim.
Right. And there's just been this effort. Yeah. I mean, as a political matter, it's super obvious. If you convince conservatives the main threat to their lives is Muslims, then it puts you automatically in the side of Israel. I guess that's their thinking. Y.
But I don't want any foreign power engendering hate in my country. Get out of here. Okay. If I was having a dinner party and someone spent the entire meal trying to make everyone at the table hate each other, I say get the hell out of my house. I don't want that here.
Right. Right. So I just object on that level. And moreover.
There are a lot of bad Muslims. There are a lot of really nice Muslims and decent, humane Muslims. And in general.
I like people who prostrate themselves before God, who show reverence before God. I'm not God. So if you're getting on your knees five times a day and bowing before God, even if it's not my God, I don't hate you for that. You know, I don't believe in your religion. I'm not a Muslim. I believe in Jesus.
But you are not my natural enemy. Anyone who has reverence before higher power is likely to be on my side because that person doesn't think he's God. And he's not like some [snorts] crazy hubris adult nutcase like BB or Trump who thinks that he can like open the streets of Horse on True Social. Like [laughter] no, you can't. Yeah, that's exactly right. the entire Zionist regime, the foreign policy apparatus built upon these foreign wars, these neverending wars, these proxy wars and military strikes mostly for Israel's benefit, they rely on a propaganda apparatus that's communicated that it's Muslims that are the enemy to the United States. It's Muslims that hate you for your freedom. It's Muslims that wish to take away your freedom and have the capacity to do that when actually the enemy is within our own gates. It's our own criminal government that built the largest surveillance state in the world currently working on that. Putting Palunteer in control of that, aggregating our data, creating insights on it. They seize in many of our cases half of our wealth through a giant extortion apparatus. Can Muslims over in Iran do that? I don't think so. They plunge us into foreign wars to exacerbate our public debt, putting our posterity in shackles and leading toward a 40 trillion federal debt. Can the Muslims in Iran do that? No. They pose no threat to us. Whereas our criminal regime with the reigns of power in government, and this goes beyond Trump, it was Obama and George W. Bush and Biden and so on and so forth before that. They are the true criminals that threaten our safety, our security, and our liberty. So, this is designed to be a propaganda scheme to turn people toward Israel on the basis that there's this nebulous enemy out there that hates you for your freedom. The ultimate absurdity of the aftermath of the war on terror, that bin Laden suddenly stumbled in the dunes on a copy of the Bill of Rights. He read it. Amendment 1, two, three. I hate these people. It's utterly preposterous. It's because of murderous US and Israeli foreign policy that many of the people over there hate us and they're not natural enemies. Actually, this is a more modern phenomenon because of the United States attachment to Israel and all the bloodshed that's flow that's flowed forth from it. Stop.
Right. I I really uh when I saw you in Anfest, when you brought that up, I said, "Man, it took a lot of courage for you to to say those things." Because I.
By the way, the lesson for me, having watched really carefully and been in the White House with Trump many times, is that the US president in our current system doesn't really control the country. Obviously.
Like how much power does the president have? You can't even tell BB to go away.
Some guy runs a tiny little weird ethnostate in the Middle East, you get out of here. No, you can't come in the White House. This isn't yours. Leave. You can't even do that.
So if you can't tell Netanyahu, who everybody dislikes, including his wife, to leave, how much power do you have? Not too much. Like I wouldn't let BB in my house. So I think I may have more power than the president of the United States.
If Netanyahu called me and said, "I want to come over for dinner with your kids." I'd be like, "No, you're absolutely not allowed in my house. I don't want you in here. You give me the creeps." Trump can't do that. If Netanyahu calls and says, "I want to come have dinner." Trump has to say yes. So, who's again, who's got more sovereignty, me or the president of the United States?
Wow. You hit the nail right on the head.
So, who'd want that job?
Right. Right. Right. A politician.
Yeah. Right. Desperate for the approval of strangers, which I'm not at all.
Yeah. I do think it takes a particular kind of narcissist, a particular kind of masochist to want to be president. But maybe I have a difference of opinion compared to Tucker in a little regard here. The president is both the most powerful person in the entire world and the least powerful depending on not the least but much less powerful depending on the circumstances. And why do I say that? Well, the lobbyed interests control Washington. It's the banks, big tech, big pharma, big food, big telecom, big energy, the Israel lobby, etc. All those baked into the federal apparatus. So when the president decides to do the bidding of these major lobbies, and many of them are ultimately in lock step, many of the wars are supported not only by the bankers, but also the military industrial complex, by you know, Chevron and Exxon, etc. At the same time, when he swims with the fishes of the Washington swamp regime, he is the most powerful person ever. We can wake up and learn that he's launched a war for their benefit, even if Congress never knew of the potential of such a thing. Never voted for it as the Constitution calls for in article 1, section 8. But we're in a postconstitutional world in so many ways, especially when it comes to war powers. But if the president hypothetically stands against those lobbied interests, including the Israel lobby, he becomes persona non gratada to the regime. He might get JFK. We had a president that stood up in some ways to the Israel lobby on two major things. Trying to get APEC to register under Farra when it was known as the American Zionist Council and to try to deprive David Bengurian of America's nuclear secrets, which they literally stole in the Deona project and built warheads. uh on the basis of and maybe not coincidentally because of that he was off. So just in dem demonstrating these two scenarios the president is either ridiculously powerful or not as powerful as he would otherwise be. It all depends on what he does what his posture is and Trump has chosen to swim with the fishes of the swamp in Washington to launch this war for Israel's benefit. Not only that, but try to cover up the Epstein files for everyone involved in the uni party, both in private and personal life that was implicated deeper than they ever, you know, admitted to. Howard Lutnik being the the craziest example, I think, just openly lying about his association with Epstein, meeting with him so many times, including on his island with his family after he swore that he didn't. Steve Bannon acting as a PR agent for Epstein. And on the Democratic side too, you had, you know, Nam Chsky, well, not even Democratic side, he's an anarcho syndicist, but you had Nam Chosky on the left. You had Bill Gates in the liberal establishment side, Reed Hothman with deep associations with Epstein, and then in the intelligence ties that Trump was trying to hide. Trump has decided to bankroll the genocide in Gaza. Create a ceasefire with his own board of peace that's set up for profiteering rather than peace, not addressing any of the issues at the underbelly of that conflict that's been raging on forever because of Israel's illegitimate occupation of Gaza and the West Bank. More land thievery. As if 1948 wasn't enough, that's what you have there. So that is what Washington or Trump has chosen within Washington is to side with the Israel first or to side with the neocons even up to and beyond sabotaging his own peace arrangement with Iran that he threw out JD Vance to try to sell for a while. JD Vance was on major shows trying to sell that. Well, he's shown a propensity to cave in even on his own foreign policy aims if it conflicts with the ambitions of Benjamin Netanyahu. And that's what you have. So, in some sense, I think the president is powerful when he chooses to do the bidding of the lobbies of the Israel lobby of Netanyahu, etc. And that other times, if he does act against those things, he will be targeted and maybe even killed. That is what kind of political system we have. It's being more transparently presented to Americans than ever, but that's what we're dealing with. So, yeah, this is why Tucker Carlson calls Trump a slave. I'm not sure that I necessarily agree with that all the time. It seems like more or less Trump is friends with Netanyahu much of the time. He bears culpability for it. And by saying you're just a slave that's, you know, being completely controlled, it takes away from some of the responsibility that I think needs to be placed squarely upon Trump's orange head. That's what I think. But what do you guys think? Overall, I totally agree with Tucker, of course. Let me know in the comments below what your reactions are. Is Tucker correct? What is Israel's endgame? What is the endgame of Zionism in the Middle East and the United States when Americans are turning away from it? Let me know down below. Like the video, subscribe to the channel, subscribe to the Hodge Twins also. Great episode, great interview with him. I really like their interviews in general and they had a great conversation. So check that out, too. And if you like this video and breakdown, please consider joining as a member of Liberty Vault. You can do that by clicking the join button below. And doing that gets you immediate access to all of my videos before they go live to the general public on YouTube. Members get to see many videos right now. There's several for you to watch before anyone else. And I really appreciate your membership if you do that. And if you want a free copy of my first book, Compact of the Republic, click the link in the description down below. That'll send you out to a website. Just plug in your email right there and I'll send you a full free copy of that book. No obligations whatsoever. And look, I have a few demands from this sinister, Israelobsessed, vile, corrupt regime, and I won't apologize for them. No more war, no more debt, no more inflation, and no more empire. Peace out, guys. Catch you in the next one.