Transcription
When you get up into that level, even above intelligence and CIA, when you get up into that level of like steering committees and the CFR, the trilaterals, like it's not accidental that Epstein was literally David Rockefeller's legate on the trilateral commission. He was a commissioner for it.
Is there evidence that intelligence agencies of any country have used or criminal organizations in any country have ever successfully carried out assassinations using crazy or suggestible people who don't know they're participating in it? Despite what you've been led to believe by the corporate media and the establishment political class, the CIA not only meddles in domestic politics, but their influence in domestic politics is palpable. And here Tucker Carlson and his guest Jay Dyer talk about that very fact. How the CIA influences political systems and in fact elections domestically to bring about the policies that it wants, not Americans. And how does Epstein figure into all this? They discussed that too. Let's check it out and break it down. Please like the video. Subscribe to the channel and hype it if you can.
Which is to say, lone gunman shoots public figure. Lone gunman is actually a tool of some other organization. Doesn't know he's a tool of the organization. He committed the murder, but he did so maybe unbeknownst to him at the urging of some other group. Sirhan Sirhan, for example. Is there any evidence? Do we know that's actually happened ever?
I think it's very obvious that it has happened. I don't know what the standard of evidence would be to say with absolute certainty in a specific case. You know, people talk about Marinus van der Lubbe, that he was used, you know, for the Reichstag. We people talk about, as you said, Sirhan. I mean, you could say Oswald perhaps was, uh, there is such a thing as false flag recruitment, which is where people are recruited into thinking that they're working for this group, but they're actually working for this other group, right?
That's correct. So that does occur. And I think that, if you study assassinations and how they're conducted, they don't happen often, but they do tend to use, you know, uh, crazy people or or people that are very suggestible. So I think that's definitely probably 100% goes on. I mean, we had what was Shinzo Abe? Was one of the most recent, uh, other than Charlie Kirk, obviously, you know, assassinations that there was some weird, weird things with that in terms of usually political ideologues or religious ideologues are very useful for these types of of operations.
Um, yeah, I think I think especially with JFK, even, you've got significant evidence. If you look at the person of Angleton and if you look at what came out in the JFK files, like he was literally just passing all kinds of information to the Mossad. It was, it's in the JFK files. There's like four, four pages that were about his secret relationship with the Mossad. Yeah. And that is considerable. Well, that's something that was swept under the rug by the corporate media narrative, but the relationship between Angleton in specific and the CIA cultivating that relationship with the Mossad, passing information, information about domestic United States surveillance is far more interesting of a story than what was ever purported in the corporate media, which tried to bury that under the rug.
And look, the FBI has done entrapment schemes. The CIA has carried out psychological operations on the American people. Whether it be MK Ultra, Operation Mockingbird, trying to influence the thought patterns of regular Americans, propagandize them. These are things that came to light. I think both of those under the Church Committee, which blew the cover off them. So, how much more of that exists that we don't know? And it's not necessarily rubber-stamped by the CIA when it comes to JFK's assassination. Maybe other assassinations. Marinus van der Lubbe, for instance, was the Dutch communist that set fire to the Reichstag. But many historians have asked the questions, well, was that a false flag of sorts to get Hitler more political power? Because that set the stage for the enabling acts, the Reichstag fire decree, and allowed him to suspend the Weimar constitution and solidify the Nazi state. We know that the CIA dabbles in these sorts of situations. So, of course, you probably have these orchestrated killings. Was Thomas Matthew Kroll involved in something like that? The American people will never know because everything about the CIA, just about, is transparent. We can't even know their budget. So, that's what goes on.
Uh, I think there was a confluence of interest, as you said, with organized crime, CIA, and Israeli interests, all sort of had the motive, uh, in regard to JFK. But I think that's a recurring pattern is to absolutely contract it out to either organized crime. I mean, Murder Inc. began as a Jewish assassination squad that was used by not just Sicilian Mafia, but also at times the US would contract out and use these people for operations. If you want to get rid of somebody, just use the gangsters. You're not going to do it yourself. So, yeah, that's that's well known. And I think if you look at Operation Underworld, where the CIA was using organized crime for many years.
How much evidence is there that the CIA, do you think, has an active role in American politics now?
Uh, my research has mostly been past decades of that relationship. So, I'm not the most up-to-date on present.
How certain are we that the United States, US politics has been influenced by intellect?
I mean, I think when people talk about the deep state, we're talking about a sort of breakaway national security apparatus that has a tremendous amount of influence and control on domestic and foreign policy. Absolutely, 100%. I think that superstructure that is international, that is, uh, you know, people talk about the Five Eyes and all that kind of stuff. I think that they do coordinate. I think it's very clearly when you get up into that level, even above intelligence and CIA, when you get up into that level of like steering committees and the CFR, the trilaterals, like it's not accidental that Epstein was literally David Rockefeller's legate on the trilateral commission. He was a commissioner for it.
Yeah, that's something that wasn't covered very much compared to some of the more salacious aspects of the Epstein scandal. But indeed, Epstein was the understudy of David Rockefeller, the man that most built the globalist infrastructure that we see today. This transnational elite around the trilateral commission also was involved in the CFR, the Council for Foreign Relations. And we're supposed to think nothing of this.
Now, I'll give two examples that show very recent dabbling by the CIA and the intelligence apparatus in general on American politics. One was revealed through the reporting of the Twitter files, where it shows that executives from Twitter, prior to Musk's acquisition, were in lockstep with federal overseers, feds, trying to get them to ban certain users and censor certain speech, especially related to the COVID regime, especially related to the wave of totalitarianism that swept through the United States when the feds, an abstraction in the air, was licensed to write guidelines, lines to pass down to the governors to shut down societies. You had curfews, religious worship restrictions, old people died alone, you couldn't see them, shut down schools, shut down businesses. No semblance of reality in terms of what damage was done. And meanwhile, they wanted to ban people that were critical of it, critical of the biggest wave of totalitarianism we've seen domestically in our entire lives. Even more so than after 9/11. You had these feds operating with Twitter, secret channels, telling them who they should or should not ban or who they should censor or not. You also had them collaborating with the social media giants on censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story, which was true, but they said was a Russian disinformation campaign. The CIA said that those 51 former intelligence employees signed their letter to a farcical declaration that that had all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation when it actually was true. That had a major effect on the 2020 election. No matter whether you supported Trump or not, they do collude with corporate entities to affect domestic politics. The case for this is ironclad. There's no poking holes through it. It's just a reality. So what, what things did they do like this that we don't know? Again, they're not transparent, but it certainly happens.
I mean, that's, they created that for Brzezinski, right? It was Kissinger who went to David Rockefeller and said, "We do this guy, Brzezinski, will be great for Trilateral." They created it for him. And so for Epstein to essentially be at that level, which is, no, I don't think we knew that until that, you know, Bannon interview came out and Jeff said, "Yeah, I was on the commission. I was up there with David Rockefeller." Yeah.
That's one of those details that's, I mean, do you ever suspect that the sex, the sexual components of the Epstein story, which I don't want to minimize because they're awful, but do you ever suspect that maybe they're also a distraction from bigger?
It's much bigger than that. Yeah. I mean, in a lot of those emails and text messages and things that came out, you've got like, there's so many crazy examples. Like you've got, I mean, you've got high-level finance, money laundering is part of that. You've got weapons trafficking is a huge part of that. Um, because if you read Whitney Webb's book, right? Like it's the Adnan Khashoggi operation, which also included like filming people on that yacht. Uh, that becomes kind of a pattern for also the way that Epstein would do, uh, his stuff. So you've got weapons trafficking, you've got the high-level blackmail, you've got human trafficking, you've got, um, money and finance, and you've also got, uh, planned chaos in certain areas that you move money to prior to the chaos to benefit from the destruction, which is something that Ian Fleming had SPECTRE doing all the time. So, yeah, Epstein talked about doing this in Syria. He talked about doing this in Greece. He was part of this transnational elite that in some ways seemed to operate above the intelligence services where it was like the intelligence services in some way are working for him, but he's certainly colluding with them.
Ryan Grim has done some really interesting reporting on this on Drop Site, where it's not exactly an easy question of was Epstein working for Mossad. In some ways, he seemed to be. Some ways he certainly seemed to be working for Israeli intelligence. We see that from the Drop Site series on this wire transferring money to known Israeli spies like Yoni Koren, trying to procure cyber weapons for Israel, brokering state-level agreements between Israel and foreign countries, having Ehud Barak stay at his house for prolonged periods. All sorts of other things seem to confirm that relationship, but Ryan thinks that Epstein was kind of even operating above them in some respects. Certainly so. Something that the United States, again, corporate media did not want you to know. And they're still concealing 2 million documents that probably provide a lot more context in this area. And we're supposed to look the other way and say, "Hey, this is all conspiratorial. There's nothing to this Epstein thing." Even though Trump tried to move worlds to get it to be concealed, cover it up. But without the indignified faction of Thomas Massie, Ro Khanna, and Marjorie Taylor Greene and some other inspiring Republicans to vote for that and shut the door on the scan, the scandal in some ways, didn't shut the door, I guess, but try to force the disclosure. We wouldn't even know what we do know.
I, I suspect Ian Fleming was talking about the sort of, uh, Epstein level, Rothschild level, uh, gaming of different markets because that's a huge part of what they were doing, where he's basically emailing Ariane Djall and he's saying, "There's going to be a huge conflict over here. Move in early, buy up resources, etc., because the conflict's, the chaos is coming." They did it about Kenya, uh, or excuse me, Somalia. There was emails about, uh, how to do this with the Greek debt crisis when that happened to buy up after it collapsed. Right? So that's a huge component. And we know that that's nothing new because the Rothschild's biography that I was just finishing reading by Morton Brags about how they did the same thing at Waterloo. They, they crashed the London stock market on the basis of false information and then bought it up when it crashed when they figured out that the information was false. So that's exactly what the same thing that Jeffrey Epstein was doing in the emails with, uh, Ariane Djall.
It's funny that they called the, you know, the thousand years after the fall of Rome the Dark Ages as compared to this. It's also crazy too that we think that there's no religious component to the world today when we seem to have all kinds of very demonic activities going on, which suggest, you know, secret societies, cults, you name it. So I think that the world really operates in this way versus the sort of secular mythology that we were taught. Yeah, certainly.
So there's a transnational security elite full of globalists that generally support the banks, generally support the military-industrial complex, the Israel lobby, etc., because they provide lucrative money streams and then benefits for both parties acting in collusion against the interests of average Americans. And Epstein was certainly part of it. Outside of all the sex crimes, which are a major part of the story, the connections with intelligence services and the connections with these elite globalists trying in many ways to put the damper on American prosperity and American sensibility is a major part of the story too. Epstein operating against the interests of the United States and then people within the United States uni-party covering for it are a major part of that scandal. I did something like 500 videos on Epstein and talking about some of these angles, many of them in depth. So, check out the channel on that.
But it's just very clear that the intelligence service, despite saying, "Hey, we don't dabble in domestic politics," does exactly that. And they do that for a reason. And their dabbling doesn't know a particular political party. They care about particular policies, many of which both parties generally align on, like the wars. And you might say, "Hey, the Democrats support this war, like Ukraine, more than the Republicans support this war, like Iran." But the point is to get war, to get those money streams and contracts out to the parasites attached to Lockheed Martin and Boeing and their political collusion machine within Washington that foment this mass murder wave. Probably the most destructive American political platform. The most destructive political program is the war machine. And it's often when you get in Washington, the question is never, well, let's have a non-interventionist foreign policy versus let's actually bomb a lot of countries. It's just which country we're going to bomb is the question. The political machine has made that. So that's why people like Pat Buchanan and Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul and Thomas Massie and Justin Amash were made into pariahs because they actually behaved principally. They wanted to represent their constituents that didn't want anything to do with those wars and didn't see them as beneficial in any way because of how many civil liberty curtailments spilled forth from them, how much debt accumulated because of them, how much inflation exploded due to those nefarious acts. That's what you have in Washington.
And it's not just that. The CIA tried to recruit two of the 9/11 hijackers, Nawaf Alhazmi and Khalid Al-Midhar. That has come to light in documentation, trying to have inside men in Al-Qaeda before the Al-Qaeda attacks. This was the subject of some reporting, again, covered up completely by the corporate media, but included in Tucker Carlson's 9/11 series and otherwise. But that backfired immensely. They tried to dabble in domestic politics despite the letter of the law saying that they can't do that. Why? Because the intelligence services operate above the law. Again, Americans can't even know what their budget is at the CIA. Most of the CIA budget is completely concealed from the public, who they are stealing from in a giant extortion apparatus known as the IRS to fund. And then you're still supposed to say, "Hey, we have representative government. The government just reflects our interests." Well, not this criminal, murderous, propagandizing deep state that controls the CIA and the intelligence community. Not the NSA that embarks on the biggest Fourth Amendment paper shredder that we've ever seen in terms of mass bulk data collection. And now the collusion between the government and Palantir building aggregated databases on information pertaining to Americans in all of the government agencies such that insights can be made. That's what we're dealing with now. A sinister machine drawn up and run by the uni-party. It knows no party name. It's not left versus right. If you're still thinking in those types of contexts, I don't think you see the full picture.
But that is true. And I'm glad they had this discussion. But what do you think? Is Tucker and Jay right about this? How much does the CIA dabble in domestic politics? What are some other examples that I didn't think of in this video? Let me know down below. Please like the video, subscribe to the channel, and if you like this video breakdown, please consider joining as a YouTube member. You can do that by clicking the join button down below. That gets you immediate access to all my videos before they go live to the general public. And I really appreciate your support if you do that. And also, if you want a free copy of my first book, Compact of the Republic, click the link in the description down below. That'll send you to a website. Plug in your email right there and I'll send you a full free copy of that work. No obligations to you whatsoever.
And look, I have a few demands for this sinister and corrupt, bloodthirsty regime, and I won't apologize for them. No more war, no more debt, no more inflation, and no more empire. Peace out, guys. Catch you in the next one.