Transcription
There is a short squeeze coming in this name, guys. It will come. So, the things you're seeing in silver will happen in Bitcoin. And I think it's going to happen this year or next year. And so, I don't care whether it goes down to 75 first. What I care about is I don't want to be chasing it when it's 300. Because I'm telling you, for people who didn't listen to me on Micron, they're all telling asking me when it's going to pull back far enough cuz they missed it. Once something goes up fast in these banana zones, you don't get a chance to get in.
All right, we are here at the Real Vision 2026 event. Uh Jordan and I, this is the first live podcast that we've ever uh done together. Um I think that the big story this week is everyone is really interested in precious metals. Uh there are two components to this that I think are interesting. One is uh maybe the explosive moves in a lot of these metals, but also maybe the breadth of how many metals are involved. I saw somebody call it metals mania, so that's what I'm going to go with. What are your thoughts on metals mania?
Let's see. Last year we were here and we all had bananas around our neck and so now we've got massive banana zones happening in high bandwidth memory related stocks in silver, not as much gold, but you've got a lot of equities that are doing it. Um, I want to break something apart because I've heard silver here mentioned more than any macro conference I've been at in my lifetime. Um, silver is not a precious metal, guys. So, I hate to break everyone's kind of um, association with it. It might be in there. It is a critical mineral for technology. So, if you guys haven't spent the time on it, I am writing a paper because it's beyond me that people don't understand yet that drones are the new tanks. Drones take an enormous amount of silver and they are disposable. They get blown up and then you build another one. So the percentage of silver that is necessary for drones compared to tanks off the charts. Every single part of technology, everything semiconductors, uh solar, massive for solar. So the energy that powers, you're going to start to hear more and more uh over the course of this year people talk about this. So Venezuela, Greenland, I'm giving you some inside information. Something will go on with Cuba very, very soon for the exact same reason. Part of it is strategic from a military basis, but part of it is also making sure that the hemisphere does not have Russia, China, Iran, and also that the critical minerals that are in all of these places are also something that the US has access to. So all of this stuff is happening and I think when you're looking at things like silver, it again gets brought back into artificial intelligence.
So, uh, I've seen people break down the market into utility-based metals, which I think is what you're highlighting here, that these are being used. Um, my friend Will Clemente had a really interesting, uh, approach. He's thinking about this from an investment standpoint. He said, well, from the lessons I've learned in crypto, people normally rotate from Bitcoin to ETH to altcoins. That's kind of the capital rotation. And when Bitcoin runs, then you kind of move through that cycle. So he, you know, really big brained it and he was like, well, gold and silver, copper, platinum, and there's kind of this rotation. It does look like platinum and some others are starting to run here. I recently saw Stanley Ducken Miller uh talk about how the copper market is the tightest he's ever seen in his career. What about things outside of gold and silver? And is that just a utility story or are there other things going on there?
>> Well, two things about it. And Chris Perkins and I were talking about this at breakfast this morning. Um, same same exact argument and it's one of the reasons why on on the Sunday YouTube when I get into the charts of Bitcoin, I've been showing lately utility over Bitcoin. So, think of Ethereum over Bitcoin as very similar to silver over gold. Gold was leading, silver was lagging, um, and then the utility function kicked in and everything kicked in really during the summertime. If you do an overlay of Micron Technology stock relative to silver, you'll see a very similar pattern. Now, here's the way I want to kind of break it down for you guys because Jensen Yuang says this, but so you get this whole like process of going from energy. So, think of it as anything you want, gas, oil, but the physical fossil fuel side, it needs eventually to be converted into intelligence. With inside that conversion are two tracks. One shortage is in high bandwidth memory. That is the chips that are necessary. So the reason Micron, SanDisk, Western Digital, SK, Heinix, uh Samsung have all gone bananzone is because there's a scarcity right now relative to the demand. There's a race to buy this in massive size. On the other side, you have the conversion in the efficiency side for energy. And that's where transformers fit in, gas turbines fit in, silver fits in. Um, silver fits in on on on both components. You're just at a point where all of the utility side, those charts are going higher. And so eventually you will get to the point, and this is why Ethereum to me will be the one to watch for the breakout. And then Bitcoin will go with it because we're now at a point where people are talking about silver. They're not talking about gold as much. And the reason is because silver is going up at two times the pace of gold. And I think you'll start to see that in crypto the same way.
>> All right, we got to talk about the big event of the week, which was uh Donald Trump, Scott Bessant, JD Vance, these guys. This was like their Super Bowl. They went to Davos and I got the sense at the beginning of the week that he sent all of uh you know, his squad and his squad went they were kind of really hitting the Davos Elitus crowd with uh some pointed critiques. And my view was going to be that uh Trump was doing that so the administration could soften up the Davos crowd and then he would come in. He'd look like a good guy. He'd be really nice and welcoming and you know maybe the warm temperature of collectivism might uh take hold. He savaged the he was Mark Carney. He was just exactly what you would have expected uh two or three weeks before Greenland. All of a sudden, it looks like there's some sort of agreement there. It feels like the administration's commentary and the stock market are so interconnected at this point that you almost have to be a political pundit to be an investor. How do you look at Davos and its impact on asset prices?
>> It's a story this week and it'll be forgotten next week. Um, every week there's something new. So, we went in, we got Maduro. There's an event every week.
>> Who forgot about that guy?
>> Gone um the following week. So, earnings are growing at 15% this year and the economy is growing at four or 5%. None of this matters in terms of what's going to happen to the stock market over the course of the year. Will there'll be movements for a day like we saw this week? Yeah. But by the end of the week, we'll start to focus again on what's happening with earnings and what's happening with commodities and the story that's going in. I want to bring up one more thing and just make sure because this is an important point when when we're talking about commodities. Um there's an overupp of fossil fuels. So this is very 1970ish. And from an investor standpoint, that's where you should go back and do your homework. small caps, value, commodity related names. So far this year, energy and materials are the two best performing sectors in the stock market. Tech is the second worst. I think that's what this year will be about. I think everyone that's been sitting in software names and everything related to abundance is going to be in trouble and commodities are going to be a theme. But the only thing that traditionally takes down that theme is when energy prices spike too high and you get actually a demand shock and you start that's not going to happen this time because we have an over supply. Silver does not matter to the cost of a data center. It does not matter to almost anything it does to your iPhone. So your iPhone costs are going to go up. But whether the iPhone is $800 or 900 is not going to change the demand side. So you're going to see this play out in a very different way. This is this is a reflationary boom. This is not the 1970s where the stock market went sideways for this. You're going to see everything continue to move higher. So, if you get caught in the geopolitical stuff, I I wouldn't I unless there's literally a war that happens on on on the grounds of the United States, it's not going to matter, man. There's some crazy stuff happened all year. Who knows?
All right. Um, true inflation, lowest reading that we've had in a long time, 1.2%. Um, the government still up in the mid to high twos. Are you worried about inflation or deflation?
>> Deflation will be the next fear that will be real. I think we'll have an inflation I don't know what you call it. It won't be a scare, but inflation will will will go higher this year, I'm sure, from where it is now. But nothing that matters. Uh, and the only reason I say that is because eventually high bandwidth memory less important, you know, on the silver side, high bandwidth memory prices, DRAM prices, I mean, they're up 500% since September. So, that's going to filter through the technology side, but that's not a big part of inflation. As long as oil doesn't go higher, you're not going to see the transfer side. So, I don't expect inflation to go meaningfully higher. And that's the part that I say a reflationary boom is where you have inflation happening but the stock market is going higher at the same time. Precious metals are going higher. You're going to have Fed rate cuts this year. I mean this is a situation where if you're not involved in the market, I think you're really dealing with with trouble the deflationary aspect. I don't agree with with what was discussed and I think you said it so I'll disagree with you.
>> Yes, finally we can disagree.
>> Um, I think deflation is massively positive for Bitcoin.
>> So, >> wait, explain that.
>> I disagree. Perfect.
>> Yeah. I I don't subscribe to the fact that this has been a uh a move to avoiding inflation. So, that's a nice story that fits in. Uh, this is about jobs. So, if you go back and you say, well, this is to hedge against inflation. This is about voting in New York City for socialism. This is about having the consumer confidence level sitting at 50-year lows. Um, we're having a societal break. That's what Bitcoin is about for me. Deflation makes that societal break happen now. And that's going to be heading in that path, which means the disruption from AI is just starting. Uh, everyone in here has heard about humanoids. Humanoids will be a fear at some point very soon. There is no way for anyone to look at what's coming down the road. And I was having this discussion uh with an older investor who you've all heard of this week and I literally said, "How are you going to feel at your age when there's a humanoid walking down the street in 6 years? How is that going to feel? What are you going to think about? Have you put that in your mind of how to invest now until then?" Bitcoin will benefit all the way through. So I don't view it as an inflation thing. I view it as a deflation thing and I always have believed that and I think the reason is and someone mentioned it on the stage. I lived in Brazil. I talked to people who had money confiscated from their account. This is not about stealing money a little bit a day while you have a job. This is about stealing money a little bit every day where you either don't have a job or where you're worried how you're going to be able to be able to afford a house. So, I think Bitcoin is a different story.
>> Why do you think Bitcoin's price is not higher right now?
>> Well, it's higher than it was two and a half years ago. So, it's a moment in time. Um, here's some simple math for people to kind of get through. And let's just because I wrote a paper on this about a silent IPO, a redistribution. So, Glass Node has kind of estimated that over the course of the last two years, and I picked two years because of the ETF, we've had about 2 million Bitcoin sold and about a million a million and change of Bitcoin bought by ETFs. You're kind of offsetting things and this transfer is happening. I don't see wealth management and Larry Fink changing that at any point. That has continued to grow. Stable coin market cap has continued to grow. So on the one side I've got the network effects. On the other side I have the redistribution getting OG whales to sell of which for everyone out there who's wondering why they're selling. If you owned a billion dollars of Bitcoin and you weren't selling it, you guys should all leave here. Like there's no reason to have all of that money tied up into one asset, especially at a time where you should be worried about quantum. You should be worried about it. Not that it is a real risk, but you have to diversify your portfolio. And if you have that much money in one asset, it should be redistributed. There's other opportunities. So I think the redistribution story has kept us unchanged for the last year. But again, part of it was what happened last year coming into this event when we all had bananas around our neck. You ended up with a situation where retail got burned immediately. We had a memecoin come out that frustrated people. Then as the year went on, we had liberation day. So all of a sudden the president who was supposed to be pro crypto had events that were going on that didn't seemingly care. And then we had the event on October 10th. So, I think really what's happened is right now the energy of this market is you guys. It's retail and everyone here wants to buy it when it's going higher. Nobody wants to buy it when it's been sitting down here. So, I fully expect that we'll get a breakout. I think Ethereum will lead it for the utility reason. So, I think we're in the utility phase. And when it does happen, the next time we get above 100,000 in Bitcoin, I don't think it's going to turn around and go back. I also thought and I again have bought more Bitcoin over the course of the last two months than at any time in my lifetime. That's how much I feel that this year is going to be a big year because I do think that the conversation which we had talked about before there is a short squeeze coming in this name guys. It will come. So the things you're seeing in silver will happen in Bitcoin and I think it's going to happen this year or next year. And so I don't care whether it goes down to 75 first. What I care about is I don't want to be chasing it when it's 300 because I'm telling you for people who didn't listen to me on Micron, they're all telling asking me when it's going to pull back far enough because they missed it. Once something goes up fast in these banana zones, you don't get a chance to get in.
Today's episode is brought to you by Fountain Life. Are you ready to seize the day that will change your life? Guaranteed. You invest in wealth creation every single day, but what's the point of it without an optimal health span? Award-winning Fountain Life is the world's most advanced longevity destination. And in just one day, they can map an exact and complete picture of your health profile. No guesswork and no blind spots. From there, they create a personalized plan that prevents disease and may even reverse aging using precision medicine and restorative therapeutics. It's available nowhere else. In other words, your energy supercharged, your memory sharper, your life extended, and so you can live without limits. It's the best investment you'll ever make. Receive $1,000 off the cost of a life-changing membership with FountainLife when you schedule a call at fountainlife.com/pom. That's fountainlife.com/pom.
Today's episode is brought to you by Bitcoin IRA. Are you a crypto investor with a retirement account but don't have any crypto in that retirement account? Then listen up. This message is for you. Bitcoin IRA is revolutionizing the way Americans save for retirement. They're helping smart investors diversify their savings with access to over 80 cryptocurrencies. With world-class customer service, militarygrade encryption, and a vertically integrated licensed trust company, it's no wonder more than 200,000 Americans trust Bitcoin IRA to secure their financial future. Getting started is quick and easy. It takes just 3 minutes to open an account. Once you're set up, their team of IRA specialists will reach out to guide you through every step of the process. Whether you're transferring an IRA from a legacy bank, rolling over an old 401k, or starting fresh with new contribution, the Bitcoin IRA team is here to help you access real crypto in your retirement account. And here's the best part. As a Pomp podcast listener, you can earn up to $1,000 in rewards. All you have to do is add funds to your account. Search for Bitcoin IRA in the app store or visit bitcoinirra.com/pump and you can join 200,000 Americans on their journey to upgrade their retirement. That's bitcoinirra.com/pump to upgrade your retirement today.
>> You mentioned the qword. You're not supposed to do that. Word quantum the qword. Um are you worried about that? I saw uh this uh this past week. I think it was Jeff put out a piece that they um are very worried about quantum. I think they may even be uh recommending now people don't buy Bitcoin uh if I understood it correctly because of the quantum risk.
>> I think Raul said it exactly the way I would say it and I have said it on the show. Why people care about Bitcoin when quantum comes in is some marketing thing that has stuck with people. If a nation state gets quantum, why do they care about getting the Bitcoin that isn't stored somewhere? I I just don't see the relevance. When you could go into bank accounts and get 20 times the number in the US, you could go set off nukes. You could go do whatever you want. So I don't see how a nation state would care about an asset which is so tiny relative to all the assets in the world. I mean we're talking about $2 trillion asset in a world that is 500 to 800 trillion. It's an odd lot. It does not matter. It wouldn't change anything. Uh and trust me in the traditional finance world when Bitcoin falls everyone then extrapolates to go well Micro Strategy is going to go over. This is going to be a domino effect. The economy is going to go into recession. The assets too small. So I don't I don't worry about quantum at all. And that gets aside from the fact that it's technology. So as quantum gets further ahead, the defense mechanisms get further ahead as well.
You're talking about Bitcoin from an enterprise versus consumer standpoint, the retail investor and this transition to an institutional investor. AI is going through a similar thing. You have OpenAI which is very consumerheavy for a lot of their revenue but you also have uh Anthropic which is much more enterpriseheavy. Um Daario from Anthropic was uh sharpshooting a little bit in Davos and he was uh amplifying the concerns around OpenAI's ability to drive revenue and how hard consumer is etc. Um I know that you've got some thoughts around OpenAI talking about adding ads and this kind of pursuit of revenue. Are you worried about open AI at all?
>> Before I answer this, I just got to I got to take a little redirect here. I'm dressed like I'm in Miami. You're dressed like you're in New York. I'm wiping sand off my face from yoga this morning. You look like you've been sleeping all day.
>> Well, as the people who were at dinner with me last night, I did get a good night of sleep.
>> I was with you, so I thought
>> All right. Um, yoga.
>> Yeah, morning yoga.
>> Nice. There was a spot right next to me for you.
>> I woke up this morning. I did a lot of push-ups.
>> Same thing.
>> There you go.
>> Different name.
>> Uh, all right. I'm going back to New York, by the way, into a snowstorm. You're going to probably hang out and enjoy the weather.
>> Yeah.
>> The the OpenAI thing is probably um going to be the most important story for the stock market this year in terms of how this plays out. Uh if you ask me and you put together a timeline of all the events over the course of the last year, there's a lot of desperation showing up for them to get revenues. Um they've made a consumer bet. I use Chat GBT more than the other ones. Nowhere near as much as it used to be, but let's say 30% of my time is on Chat GBT. Uh
>> that's low. That's low.
>> Yeah. Well, it's gone down significantly. It was probably 70 a year ago. Um I didn't use Gemini almost at all a year ago and now Gemini is third. Anthropic and Claude is number two, but that's mainly because of the the recent coding advancements. Regardless of of the numbers, um this is going to become a problem for them because I think the majority of their users are using it for Google search reasons. When I talk to consumers, they use it as literally an answer system. um they don't use it for anything tech-wise and that's the problem if you ask me they're getting the the lowest adoption users and they're kind of depending on ads and I think that's why they said they're coming out with ads all of the other ones perplexity finance Gemini used for all deep research all consulting things for sure. It's my number one tool for it. Claude has gone completely with enthropic down the enterprise that is dominating that that part. They've all kind of taken their niche. Grock will be the best model, I'm sure, once the rollout comes out of Grock 5 just because of the leaprogging. And Grock is an interesting one because it'll be integrated in it's already integrated into a Tesla. It's already integrated in a lot of different ways. I think ChachiBT is got some problems. It's a valuable asset. It's a valuable brand, but they just don't have the users to actually make money off of it. And so in the case of Anthropic, their revenues are up to 9 billion. I think they said
>> it's like half of Open AAI.
>> Half of Open AI. And the losses for OpenAI are now supposed to be 14 billion. The problem you're going to run into with this is their valuation is significantly above anthropics. And it's wrong. And what you've seen in Oracle stock price, which is back down to new lows, is representative of the fears on OpenAI. So I do think this is going to be a fear. It's not systemic. Uh but I do think it's another problem for the tech stocks. You want to be in scarcity. And the problem with OpenAI at the end of the day is unlimited competition. So they had a huge lead. Normally when you get that kind of a lead and you've won the brand recognition, you usually win or at least it gives you a long time to lose it. They lost it in less than a year. It's impossible that things move this fast. But that's what we're in is the constant leaprogging every single month, the exponential change. Human beings brains can't deal with this and that's what's happening and this is going to continue. So I think there's going to be risk with them this year. I don't trust Sam Waltman and he was the only one. Well, perplexity is kind of a lower tier. But of the four big boys, he was the only one not at Davos and he was rumored to be in the Middle East trying to raise $50 billion. So that's another desperate act.
>> You don't trust Sam? How can how can you trust a guy who had a mutiny the board try like go through the stuff with Microsoft not that long ago and then go to the BG2 podcast with Brad Gersonner when he basically walked off and couldn't answer the question directly said I'll find people to buy your shares like there's a lot of warning signs there with them that that stand out more than just uh what's showing up on the the desperation by the way Gemini said they wouldn't do ads and demos on stage page two days ago in Davos said I was very surprised that OpenAI said they were going to try to monetize ads now. So again, it's all lining up that they're desperate to raise cash and Soft Bank's connected to him and I think that's always historically been a bad sign for the the winners.
Le >> let's talk about uh the big dog Elon Musk. Uh he's got self-driving cars. I think people now recognize, right, they've got the taxis on the road. Um, I saw people now are reporting, you know, hey, I got to wait seven minutes. The robo taxi will pick me up. Uber was 20 bucks. This is like a $1.50. That's a big gap. So, we know that that is at least in production and people are starting to adopt it. Uh, we know full self-driving for people who own the Teslas. He now is changing the business model to become subscription. He recently in the last 24 hours said that he's going to raise the price in the future as full self-driving becomes more and more valuable. So he is giving himself the option of price elasticity. And then the humanoid robots he's now saying that it sounds like 2027 he thinks that these will be out in production in the world. People will be interacting with them etc. So you've got kind of what I'll call Tesla AI related and uh robotics. At the same time, XAI, I mean, this guy is like got his hair on fire. They are building multiple facilities and I think these are the largest data centers in the world. They also are uh starting to show um kind of the power in all of these rankings or benchmarking tests that Grock is very very good compared to these other models. and he is maybe the only person who has figured out how to vertically integrate their model into a consumer product because now the X algorithm is being run by AI. And so when I look at this, it seems like he has the most pervasive or expansive AI portfolio or empire. Does that give him an advantage or a disadvantage as we move forward compared to some of these other companies where you know anthropic is enterprise AI etc. Like how do you look at Elon playing into this because he's playing it in a very different way.
>> It's a long time since a year ago when he was awkwardly dancing on stage at the uh post post inauguration and getting memes thrown all over the place and then being hated around the world.
>> I prefer two years ago when he sat on stage with Andrew Ross Sorcin and he told the advertisers to go f himself and then said, "Let me make sure you were clear."
>> So I I own Tesla. I think it will be the best performing of uh the Mag 7 and the reason is because I believe this is the beginning of the physical world and integrating AI into it and the fact that we have a problem with silver is an in indication of the problem. In fact, I tweet I posted this week Elon effectively speaking about silver. So, if you don't trust my judgment on how silver is not a precious metal, just look at the thing that I posted this week, which was reposting something Elon posted, I think 3 months ago, highlighting the danger of silver in the industrial process. He didn't mention it as a precious metal. He mentioned it as an industrial metal. So here's the person who out of all of the leaders at Davos of which he spoke as well, he's not a coder. He's an engineer. He's a vertical scale builder. He understands the importance of vertical integration. He understands the importance of being able to produce enough robots and cars to not have it take 5 years. And he's built this out. The Gigafactory is a massive structure, one of the largest structures in the world. He built that a long time ago and his expectations of it. So if you take that he's going to bring an IPO this year with SpaceX for 1.5 trillion and XAI will be after that and he will probably bring XAI into Tesla. Tesla, XAI and SpaceX as a combined group. You have to really put your brain like to the test and think about what his endgame is and then go back and look what his plan is. Then try to think of any human being you've ever read about in any book to scale of this proportion and to be this prepared with a 10-year plan and to be doubted by everyone on Wall Street to not be trusted. So what he's doing right now is beyond comprehension and the stock trades at a very high quote unquote fundamental value meaning there is no valuation for it. But I think this year the things you mentioned are all real happening now. You left out one thing with the full self-driving we should have the roll out according to him in Europe and China this year as well. This is a big deal and I think more people need to spend time on it. I think it changes the way people think again about the shortages and the scarcity. He has thought about everything vertical integration which again gets into scarcity.
Ladies and gentlemen, as you know, I scour the world trying to find ways to help you make money, make better decisions financially, or try to figure out what to do in your portfolio. My latest find is something that is going to help you in a way that you probably didn't even know you needed help. The Gemini credit card is doing something that no one else in the market is doing. Money in America is changing and Bitcoin, it went from being dismissed and it's now being discussed at the highest levels of finance and government. That shift is already happening and people are trying to figure out the easiest ways to participate. That's why the Gemini credit card can be used on daily purchases, but it's the only one that has instant Bitcoin rewards. The instant Bitcoin rewards credit card. That's Gemini. Here's how it works. You buy groceries, you buy gas, you buy or book flights, anything you buy in your daily life. Instead of earning points that you forget about or that are often fairy tale land, you simply earn Bitcoin instantly. So, you just spend like you would on a normal credit card, but you see your Bitcoin rewards accumulate. The card's loaded up with everything you need. There's no annual fee. There's no foreign transaction fees. and you get a $200 welcome bonus when you spend $3,000 or more in your first 90 days. Now, you can see if you're eligible with no impact to your credit score as well. So, this is a free look to see, can I get the Gemini credit card? Go click the link in the description or go to gemini.com/pump to apply and you can start earning instantly. gemini.com/pump. There's rates and fees in the description for more information or visit gemini.com/pump.
So, one of the things I don't hear people talking about as much anymore is Tesla's impact on the other car manufacturers. We know that the Ford CEO went to China. He basically he he scared the hell out of people. He came back and said, "This BYD guys, they're going to put us out of business. There will be no Ford." Tesla obviously with these robo taxis like do consumers not want to own their own car anymore? Is there regulation where if it is, you know, whatever 10 times safer for self-driving, do we ban human drivers? Like, how do you think about, you know, this market developing? Because you're not just talking about consumer preference at this point. You now are talking about cost and safety. And so, insurance costs are 50% lower. If you can prove that you can save lives, I mean, I don't know, there's got to be a politician somewhere who says, "Screw it. Let's ban human drivers."
So, let's start on this question with what uh the Ford CEO said when he came back from China. If you guys haven't read this, just type in um I forget the Ford CEO's name, but just type in Ford CEO Dark Factories China, and you'll get the story. And this is after Jim something, right? Jim something.
>> It's not Jim Ford, but it's Jim something. Um, basically his horror and this was a year after he had said that he he purchased a Xiaomi and drove it around for a while and could not believe how much better the car was than Ford cars and said they were screwed. Then he went to China and visited to go see the quote unquote dark factories. Now a dark factory is called the dark factory because there's no humans in it. It's all run by robotics and humanoids. China's already there. Elon Musk will be there. no US car manufacturer will be there. So effectively, this is the only way that you'll be able to have cars cheap enough for human beings to buy. So when people ask me questions and they try to come up with ways that um there won't be deflationary and all you have to do is look about what he says it'll cost for a humanoid and what it'll cost for a car. The only way to reduce the cost dramatically is that the number one cost that's associated with a car is not the parts. It's not the steel. It is the labor that's involved. That's the most expensive cost of anything. And so if he has humanoids building everything and it's 247, the cost drops dramatically. I said this last week when we when we did the podcast, I said it on mine. average hourly the weekly hours in the payroll numbers that come out are 34 about 34. So in the US it's about 34 hours per week is what a worker puts in. When you extrapolate the cigarette breaks, the lunch breaks, the pantry talk, the flirting, and everything else that goes associated with people in an office, you're probably down to 20 hours. A robot will work 168 hours a week. That means they're eight times more productive right off the bat. You can see where the cost of making anything will be down dramatically. There's no injuries involved. There's nothing that happens. You don't have people quitting. There's no strikes. It changes the entire game on the industrial side. And that's what's coming. And in the case of 5 years, that the six-year talk is walking down the street with inside the plants. If you listen to Moonshots, you heard MIT grads Dave Blondon and Peter Deiamandis talk about what they saw in there. And they were astonished at what he had built, including an aluminum facelter inside the Gigafactory that was spitting out car parts from aluminum cans. This is how much the guy has thought about everything. And this is where he is on like on top of the uh the planet from thinking about things.
>> Jim Farley.
>> Jim Farley. There you go.
>> He's uh in trouble for sure. Um, when you think about uh these dark factories, you're talking about cars. Are there going to be dark corporations, right? Like people keep talking about like one person companies. I now one of the things I think I see online that's pretty cool is people are buying these like Mac minis and they're like, "Well, screw it. I'm not going to use the computer for myself." They're setting up like its own Gmail account, its own GitHub, its own credit card, its own, you know, phone number, email, like all that kind of stuff. And they're basically just like turning this thing loose. Well, if you can do it for one, why don't you just do it for like a thousand?
>> So, Raul said something interesting yesterday. Um, I've never mentioned NFTs. We've never talked about NFTTS, but I had a uh I had a conversation with someone this week about NFTTS and just related to what Raul said and it gets into your question about dark companies. I wrote a Substack about context this week and uh all of you have heard prompt engineering. If you really want to get good answers, you need to have better prompts. The problem is everything in our life is human to human. So you can have robots making everything. You can have digital employees and AI agents executing, but they're executing and they're building for people. They're not building for other robots. They're building at the end for some consumption by humans. And the humanto human contact, in my opinion, will never stop. People will not watch the humanoid Olympics. Nobody here is going to sit there and want to hear the story of how this robot was made from a poor upbringing and everything. You you want to hear the Olympic story about how they overcame everything. There's a reason why Rocky was a big movie and Rudy is a big movie and the underdog wins is something that resonates with people. They all have this human experience that they want. There's a reason why baseball cards are still collected and Babe Ruth cards and all of these things have lasted and it's a reflection of human beings being attached to memories. So, I don't think until we get through the contextual part, which I don't know how long that's going to take. And just so you know, when a waiter comes to the table and you say you want a steak, the context is how do you want it cooked? We're at that point where the contextual side of what you need for everything in a prompt, what you actually need from the prompt. You have to give it more context. When you go to the doctor, the doctor needs context to figure out what's wrong. Well, my knee hurts. Give me the context. Tell me why it hurts, when it started, what when you notice it. The context has become important. And until we get to the point where our feelings and the things that are inside of us can actually be identified by this, we're not going to have dark companies. It's not coming soon.
>> Second thing we disagree on [ __ ] good day, Jordy. Two things to disagree on. All right.
>> A lot more than that.
>> Yeah, that's true. Uh the Let's do three questions real quick. Who's got questions? Go. Just yell. I'll repeat it.
>> Uh,
>> damn. I don't need to repeat anything. Go ahead.
>> I appreciate you sharing your journey with AI and how you use it. You talk a lot for big companies. I'm curious what what kinds you might have for small service- based companies. Context. I'm a I'm a coach. My wife and I are business partners, small business, small team, executive coaching.
>> Mhm.
>> Um, when I asked AI, how could we use it? It gives some boring answers from my perspective. Create a clone of yourself do the palatar whatever else. So two two parts of the question. One is what do you what would you suggest might be something interesting to look at from a service a small company and secondly what would you suggest how we use LMS to figure that out?
>> The question just real quick is uh how does smaller businesses use AI compared to the large companies and how do you think about actually making it productive? Number one, it can absolutely help any small business and any person here here's my suggestion for you to do with your wife immediately. Um, first of all, as someone who writes, when you if you sat down with a blank piece of paper and I had to write I mean I write three to four papers a week. I need to come up with an idea that I think will resonate with the people reading them and I need to organize my thoughts in a way that creates an outline. And I've gotten very good as like a mini movie writer where if I asked you what's the secret behind writing, when you go see a movie, you think it's an hour and a half. It's not. It's like divide that by 90 seconds. It's 90 second scenes. And that's the way I break down a paper as I go through it. The way to get off the blank paper fear to where you sit down, you're like, what am I going to write about? I can't write a paper if I have write a paper if I have a blank piece of paper. what I need to do is talk because when you go from writing something thinking to writing that actually makes it hard. So what I would highly recommend is you click the little you and your wife sit down and you click the little button on your laptop in chat GPT and you just start talking about what you want from it. What do you want it to do for you? And what I would do at the end is if you think there's anything we forgot that will help you I call it it's socratic mode. So Socrates the difference between Socrates and Plato and Aristotle. Socrates was a question thing. Let's let's go into Socrates mode. Ask me the questions. And you can do that from the beginning. We have this business. We're looking for ways that we can get from here to here. You just have to define what you're trying to accomplish to help you know what you guys are doing. You can say to it, go into Socratic mode. Ask me the things that you think you need to hear from us that it can go. But I would first just hit that button and speak for as long as you want. It could be 3 minutes. And when you hit done, you'll it'll take what's there. Then you hit the enter button. You will be shocked that by conversing with it as opposed to text. And we've all been trained to use our keyboards. It's it's stupid. I speak to it all day long. And that means my my questions or my prompts are I mean they're they're 3 minutes long. So as I'm speaking there, you guys could have hit it and said, "What did he just say?" And it's going to give an answer. That's what I would do is just explain it to it. See what comes and if you don't like the answer, say, "Hey, we wanted to get to this point. What questions do you do you need us to answer to help you give us a better answer?" If you start doing that, you'll you'll get it. Every person, every business can use it that way. So you use the AI as an executive coach for the executive coach.
>> Yeah,
>> it's pretty smart, right? All right. Well,
>> Jordy, last year you spoke a lot about Micro Strategy within a month. How have your views changed on it or way?
>> How has Jord's thoughts on micro strategy or strategy evolved? Well, when I looked at the P&L for my trading account last year, my investment account, if Micro Strategy wasn't included, it was phenomenal. Um, so I I still have it. I've actually bought more in the last 48 hours. Nothing has changed in terms of the MoAT story. Um, I think they own 4% now. No, what what do they own of the of the total 21 million?
>> 700,000 Bitcoin. you're the mathematician,
>> so it's close to four. Um, we're nothing has changed. So, my moat story on it is all dependent on where Bitcoin goes higher. This last year had two major problems and this is the way my impression of Bitcoin's uh importance goes in the world and the premium the premium is a representation obviously of the sentiment of retail. It's a representation of the volatility in the underlying security. They're both at historic lows. So until we actually get it moving the other direction, the premium should stay at very tight levels, particularly after all the DATs and everything that went on last year. Nothing has changed in terms of the moat story, which is when we get into the collateral side of the importance of Bitcoin, which I do believe is going to be a major story. As tokenization happens, it's going to matter who actually owns the Bitcoin, who can post it as collateral, who can use it for expanding their business. I've always believed in micro strategy as the capital structure of the future. Stable coins are changing the capital structure of the future by impacting the way transactions have tokenization both real world assets but also onchain assets new things that are happening those collide this year. So Micro Strategy just needs Bitcoin to trade higher. It needs Ethereum to trade higher. It needs volatility to pick back up. It needs the banana zone and once that comes it'll be viewed differently as a business. But unfortunately for right now, it's just caught again in what is effectively a bare market where Bitcoin is unchanged from a year ago, which is kind of astonishing that we could be at the same price we were in December of last year. But the feeling at this place and everyone I talked to is one of like horror. Uh micro strategy has been bad. So that's my take.
>> Last question.
>> So you talk all the AIS are based on LLM. Now you you had talked about uh BLMs and role models coming into play. How long do you think it'll take before that happens and improves AI performance?
>> The question is uh all of the AIS are mainly based on LLM, but Jord has previously talked about VLMs. How long will it take for those to have an impact?
>> So they've already had an impact. Um they have been rolling out, but so let me let me do the first part. Anything multimodal at this point takes visual language. So, if you've seen the advancements in Nano Banana, if you've ever used Nano Banana, if you haven't, and I'm not kidding you, when I went outside and he was yelling at me and I came back in
>> nicely. I was nicely.
>> Yes. I I literally put a prompt in for a visual that I'll use in my weekly video on Nano Banana, which just ran now. So, I'll have surprise when I get in to do anything multimodal. It's the advancements have been there. So, the VLMs are already happening. The Blackwell situation is really important for you for you guys to to understand. And I've talked about it a lot, but Blackwell's efficiency in chips is significantly over the hoppers which are now we're selling to China. This is a dramatic increase in efficiency. Reuben behind it will be another dramatic thing. So you'll go from needing, you know, 10 gawatts to 1 gawatt to power. That's how efficient the gains will be over these two. So you need that kind of efficiency and power to be able to do video. And one of the places that we've made advances is obviously Colossus. And that's one of the reasons why full self-driving is so important because that is the ultimate of the VLMs. That is absolutely what's happening. VLMs are the stage before VLAS which are vision language action that gets into humanoids. for that we actually need it to be so strong that it can be inside locally and that gets into the on premise side but full self-driving already has that. So think about it at the training level. They've already been doing this. So it's happening now. It's being rolled out, but Blackwell's rollout starts really in big form this year. And really when Grock 5 comes out, that'll be when we truly get to experience how much better this training model is based on Blackwell.
>> All right, we're going to do something. Georgey's going to be really mad, but it's okay. It's worth it. Um, a lot of you have come up to me in the last 24 hours and you've told me how much you enjoy listening to him on Saturday and Sundays. What you don't know is Jordy puts in an incredible amount of work to uh do both of those things. And so I figured that maybe when we say goodbye right now, you guys could all stand up and give him a standing ovation to say thank you for all the knowledge over the last year or so. So, thank you very much, Jordy. Thank all of you. All right, everyone.