Transcription
Play the whole clip. >> Okay. Well, we've already played the context of the clip to prove you wrong. So, you owe me $500. >> Dude, dude, dude, you cannot do this. You actually have to play the clip. Play the entire clip. >> Yeah, for sure. I'll play the rest of the clip. >> You're such a He never actually [laughter] >> 4 days ago, an exjudge of Donald Trump's beauty pageant, uh, beauty pageantss, MissUSA and Miss Teen USA, came out on TikTok, posted a short video, said, "Don't contact me about this. I'm not going to share too much, but the smoking gun to do with the Epstein files and Donald Trump's misconduct is in the pageantss and that we all need to be paying closer attention to the pageantss. And I specifically want your response to what this guest uh not this guest, what this exjudge uh of these pageants shared with us uh in the context of things that we already know about these pageantss such as the fact that at these pageantss Donald Trump would exploit the contestants per his admission of guilt in 2005 when speaking to Howard Stern. >> Howard Stern? >> Yeah. >> Are we talking about the same Howard Stern, the podcaster? >> Yeah. So he sat down on his at that point in time they're called the radio show. He sat down on his radio show and told and told Howard Stern uh that he would unconsensually barge into the dress into their dressing rooms and look at them while they're naked. And these were the same dressing rooms of the same pageantss that now this exjudge from those pageantss came out 4 days ago and was like, "Hey, we all need to be paying more attention to those pageantss. The pageantss are the smoking gun. The pageantss are what matters." He also said to be paying more attention to somebody else who ran those pageantss with him, Billy Bush, uh who's the man that Donald Trump told he'd like to grab women by their uh female member uh without asking first uh and he'd get away with it. So uh what we know about these pageantss is that he exploit the beauty pageant contestants or the other person that he we do know that cuz he admitted to it. The person that he ran the page show on a podcast. >> Yeah. Yeah. Yes. >> You told a girl to shut the up on Jubilee. So, why should I believe you're a feminist? We can go back and board, Dean. >> Okay. So, first and foremost, I absolutely did tell Savannah, I think that's her name, to shut the up after the perpetuate interruptions uh to uh villainize undocumented immigrants for around 20 minutes. That doesn't mean that I didn't feel bad, though. In fact, I apologized to her a handful of times and she accepted the apology. >> So, like didn't didn't mean that I didn't feel bad. She she I apologized and she accepted the apology. So, uh, do I need to apologize to you, too? >> No, I just thought it was funny. >> No, I will. I won't answer. >> You know, it's funny that you're over here like, "Okay, so when Dean tells Savannah to shut the up, big issue, never support Dean." But then when Donald Trump exploits women or girls, right, you could care less. When Donald Trump looks at a woman and says, "Shut up, piggy." You could care less. When Donald Trump is held civily liable for a court uh by by a court for the essay of Eugene Carol, you could care less. It's just very selective outrage. Now, I I do want you to respond to, you know, what this ex Donald Trump's uh of Donald Trump's beauty pageantss brought up about, you know, how we all need to be paying more attentions uh more attention to what happened at those beauty pageantss and of course Donald Trump's emission of guilt uh in 2005 of exploiting the beauty pageant contestants. So, let's hear your response, my friend. Also, Santana, I appreciate you. >> Santana, how long do you have? >> Uh take your time. >> Santana, are you a familiar with the Howard Stern show at all? >> Santana? Yes. I'm 38 years old. I I actually got to experience it live. Anyway, go ahead. Uh your response to the pageant judge. >> I I'll respond to the the pageant judge. Well, Dean saying that his admission of guilt came out on the Howard Stern show where, you know, they they religiously uh bully and abuse the mentally ill. They've done that multiple times. So, I don't really take that as >> I hear you, but would would you like to respond about the the actual like I don't I don't care about the Howard Stern show. I mean, like that whole thing was gross. But the actual judge, that's super that's super interesting. The the pageant the judge is saying that the actual smoking gun is with the pageantss. >> What do you think about that? >> I think she's delusional because there's no proof whatsoever that he ever exploited a child. >> Oh, yeah. The proof is that he admitted to it, dude. >> On the Howard Stern show? >> Yes. Yes. On the Howard Stern show. Why do you not accept that as evidence? What he admitted to was unconsensually barging into their dressing rooms and looking at them while they're naked. That is what he >> He said he could do that. He said he could do that. Not that he does. He >> No, you're you're you're confusing. Can you play the >> So, I just want to clarify. If he said that he did do that, would it be exploitation? Would it be evidence? >> It wouldn't be evidence. It would be an admission on a on a podcast. >> Wait. It would be an admission. >> It's not evidence. >> No. >> Wait. Admitting guilt's not evidence? >> No. [laughter] >> Is admitting guilt? Oh, wait, wait. So, if admitting if admitting guilt's not evidence, I just want to ask you a quick question. Let's say that you have a roommate. He's your best friend. Last night, you know that he was at a party where a bunch of drunk women were. Then he comes home the next day and he tells you, "Seriously, I did it at this party last night. I graed a drunk woman." Uh, you you you argue that you have no evidence to believe that he graded a woman last night, even though he told you because your position is an emission of guilt's not evidence. >> Well, that's not what Trump said on the podcast. >> Oh, well, now you're changing. Now you're changing the topic of debate. We could debate what Trump said after I get your response to my hypothetical to demonstrate how absurd your argued uh that an admission of guilt's not evidence. >> Sure. That admission of guilt would be evidence. >> Okay. So admission of guilt is evidence. >> Now can you play me Trump's admission of guilt, please? >> After we make a bet. So you said in that clip he didn't say that he does do this. He said that he could do this. Do you still stand? >> Yes. He said that he could do that. Yeah. >> How much money do you want to bet? >> $100,000. >> Let's make it more realistic. >> I want in. I want in. I want in. I want on the bet. >> Wait. Well, so you'll go 500 for me and 500 with Santana. >> Yeah. >> Okay. Well, I mean, you owe me $500 and you owe Santana. Can >> you bring me the clip, please? >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Here you go. >> So, so you have done that. Tell me. >> Well, I'll tell you the funniest is that I'll go backstage before a show and everyone's getting dressed and ready and everything else and >> Yeah. There you go. I'll go backstage before you saw that he'll do >> because the bet was over if he said he could do this or if he did do it. >> Play the whole clip. >> Okay. Well, we've already played the context of the clip to prove you wrong. So, you owe me $500. >> Dude, dude, dude, you cannot do this. You actually have to play the clip. Play the entire clip. >> Yeah, for sure. I'll play the rest of the clip. That one sentence, those five seconds, that was that was what you need to know in order to uh you know uh lose. >> Are you serious? >> Yes. >> You're not going to play the entire clip. You're just going to play that 5 seconds? >> No, I'm going to play the rest of it. >> 5 seconds is where it said. >> Yeah, I'm going to I'm going to play the rest of it, Santa. >> I'm going to play the rest of it to make you happy. But yeah, the 5 seconds that I just played you is what proves you wrong. You just bet me $500 that inside of this clip, Donald Trump did not say that he did do these things, but rather that he could do these things. And >> play the entire clip, man. >> Are you even listening to me? >> I'm listening. You didn't play the entire clip. You're not getting your 500 until you play the whole clip. >> Okay. Yeah, that's fine. So, here's Donald Trump saying that he does do these things, that he did do these things with like the whole clip. >> You have done. >> Well, I'll tell you the funniest is that I'll go backstage before a show and everyone's getting dressed and ready and everything else and you know, no men are anywhere >> and I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant and therefore I'm inspecting it. You know, I'm inspecting. I want to make sure he never said he went in the standing there with no is everybody okay? And you see these incredible looking women and so I sort of get away with things like that. >> $500. >> He never said he did. HE SAID HE WAS ALLOWED TO. DEAN, >> he said he owe >> me 500 bucks. >> Grizz. He said that he did do this because he was allowed to do it. >> Said he was allowed to do it. Not Oh my I can't I can't even do like you're so freaking deranged. Hang on. You're so nois that when you actually Santa hang on actually listen when you actually listen to the >> sorry that was me allowed to do it you still think it's an admission of guilt it's not >> he lit Howard Stern actually set the stage >> by saying you do these things and >> like he literally set the stage anyway this guy's not going to send our money >> Howard Stern show I'm going to get out of here >> I appreciate you for coming up Santana when we get him to pay up, I'll make sure that he sends you the $500 as well. >> Absolutely. I appreciate you, bro. >> He said he was allowed to do it. Not that he did do it. >> Are we listening to the same clip? >> Is it okay if I speak without interruption? >> Uh, sure. Go ahead. >> Okay. So, we're just going to go and replay that. Uh, and I'm just going to repeat what he says to demonstrate how absurd what you're saying is. >> The question is, how can it not be construed? >> No, I mean I mean some of these foreign girls, you know, Mr. Trump in my country, we say hello with vagina. And >> well, you could also say as the owner of the pageant, it's your obligation to do that. >> So, so you have done that. >> Point number one, Howard Stern clarifies that he has done this. >> Well, I'll tell you the funniest is that I'll go backstage before a show. >> Donald Trump says that he does do this by saying, and I quote, >> "No, he said he went backstage, not into the locker room." >> Hey, hey, Grizz. I I asked >> He said he went backstage. >> I asked you agree that he went backstage. >> I asked you if I could speak without you interrupting me. And you're interrupting me right now. >> You definitely went backstage. I'll let you make whatever argument you want after after I'm done. Is that okay? >> Thanks. So, anyways, so the first data point is Howard Stern clarifying with Donald Trump that this is something that he's done. The second data point is Donald Trump saying, >> "You could speak once I'm done. I'm going to put you on mute because you can't control your impulses." The second data point is Donald Trump saying, "I'll tell you, and I quote, I'll tell you the funniest thing is that I will go backstage before a show." >> Yes. and everyone's getting dressed and ready and everything else and you know no men are anywhere and I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant and therefore I'm inspecting it >> and then he says I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner therefore I'm inspecting it. So after playing you this clip the first time your argument hinged on him saying that last line that he's allowed to do this. Your argument was he didn't say he did do this. He said he was allowed to do this. But in all reality, the truth is he said he did this because he was allowed to do it. Uh, and then there's one more data point. Actually, there's two more data points in the rest of the clip that also prove that it's something he's done. >> You know, I'm inspecting. I want to make sure that you're there. >> Yeah, the dress. Is everyone okay? You know, standing there with no clothes. >> He says, and I quote, "Is everyone okay?" You know, they're standing there with no clothes. The only way that, you know, he'd be able to ask them if they're okay and see that they have no clothes on if he was in the dressing room with them. >> Is everybody okay? And you see these incredible >> and you see these incredible women. He saw them. >> In order to see them, you'd have to be in the same space as them >> women. And so I sort of get away with things like that. >> And then of course the most damning point would be and I sort of get away with things like that. So, when we consider all these points and we are attempting to arbitrate who's right and who's wrong, Dean is saying that Donald Trump said he did this because he was allowed to do it. And you're saying he didn't say that he did it. He only said he was allowed to do it. But then we consider those data points. Howard Stern clarifies with Trump that this is something that he's done. Donald Trump affirms that Howard Stern was right because he said the funniest thing, I will do. And then the explanation for the clip of him saying he's allowed to do this. Uh wasn't an opposition to the claim that he did do it, but rather an explanation of why he did it. And then of course the two data points of him saying that he'll talk to them. He'll ask them if everyone's okay and he'll see that they have no clothes on. He'd have to be in the same space as them, meaning that he had to have actually done this, walked into their dressing rooms. And then the most damning and final talking uh the the most dam damning and final point of something that he said to Howard Stern was of course the last five words when he said that he'd get away with doing this. So uh because of all these facts, it is obvious to yourself. I know it is. I I know that if you want to debate against this, you're just rage baiting. It's obvious to yourself that you owe me $500. My my Vinmo and my PayPal could be found in the link tree. My bio on Tik Tok top of the phone screen, too. There's no counterargument. Uh we we all know that I thought you said you were going to let me respond. >> Yeah. Yeah. We all know that you're a fraud. We all know that you know I'm right. >> Not going to let me respond. You're going to run away. >> I'm going to I'm going to let you respond. We all know that you're a fraud. We all know that you know that I'm right in your response. I know. Just make sure not to pivot, deflect, shift the goalpost. We're still on the topic of litigating what we made our bet on, which is inside of this clip. Did Donald Trump say he would do it or did Donald Trump say he could do it? Obviously, he said he would do it. It's obvious to anyone with a brain, but you know what is your terrible terrible response to attempt to move around this fact? >> So, you're you were talking about data points and you said the first data point is Howard Stern asking asking him if he did this, right? Or no, asking if he did do this, right? >> Yeah. Clarifying that he did do it. Yes. Uhhuh. And then he said, "Well, the funniest thing is I would go backstage, right?" He said the word backstage, right? >> Yeah. That was the first part of his statement. Yes. >> So, you're aware that that backstage isn't a locker room, right? >> Are you aware that the locker room is in the backstage area? >> Yeah. That's not what he said. He went back Do you know? Have you ever been on the set with Pageant? >> No. >> Well, you don't go backstage and dress. You go to a locker room and dress. You'll >> Okay. So, so therefore, we know if you're right. >> You concede that though? >> Yeah. I absolutely could see that uh for the debate because therefore we know from what Donald Trump said that he'd walk through the backstage area to get to the private dressing room because he follows up by saying that he'd go backstage by saying that he'd then like see them naked with no clothes on while they were changing asking them if they're okay um the fact that there's no men around. >> He said he'd be allowed to do it. >> Oh no, now you're actually confusing yourself. No, he said the reason why he was allowed into the space is because uh he was the owner and that that was like his justification for going there. So $500. >> That's not his justification. He said he was allowed to do it, not that he ever did it. >> No, he said he said I did it because I was allowed to do it and then this is what happened when I did it and this is what I got away with it. No, just listen. Just listen. The reduction of this clip is Donald Trump literally saying, "I did it because I was allowed to do it. And when I did it, they had no clothes on. They were naked and that's something I got away with." Right? Like, explain him explain him saying that he would ask them if they were okay. Explain him saying that the funniest thing he'll do is this. Explain him saying that he saw them with no clothes on. and explain him saying that this is something that he'd get away with if he never actually did it. Because if he never actually did it, then when would he have an opportunity to see them with no clothes on? If he never actually did it, then what was he referring to at the end of the clip when he said he got away with it? If he never actually did it, then when we when would he have an opportunity to ask them if they're okay when they were changing? Answer those four questions. Do you need me to write them down? >> Am I allowed to speak without being muted now? if you respond like specifically to the four questions I just asked. Yes. >> Okay. What was your first question? >> So I I'll just repeat them all. So my first question was if he never actually did it, then when would he have an opportunity to see them naked in their dressing rooms while they were getting undressed? If he never actually did it, then what specifically was he referring to at the end of the clip when he said he'd get away with it? And if he never actually did it, okay, right? Then why did he tell Howard Stern he did? I want you to respond to the first two question. >> He didn't tell him he did. >> I We'll litigate the third question after you answer to the first two. >> You're you're jumping around like like like like a rabbit. You're like, "Oh, okay. Whatever." So he never actually confessed that he would go into locker rooms. He only said that he was allowed to go. >> You're not answering my question. >> I just answered your first question, D. >> No, no, no, no. So my first question was if he didn't actually do it, then when would he have the opportunity to see them with no clothes on in a space where there is no men around while they were getting undressed? Because he said that he did see them, right? That's what he attested to. >> No, he didn't. He never said that. >> Yeah, I I'll play specifically the part where you attested to that. >> Make sure everything is good. He had the dress. Is everyone okay? You know, they're standing there with no is everybody okay? And you see these incredible looking women. And so I sort of get away with things like that. >> Yeah. So he said that, you know, he'll ask him if they're okay. They have no clothes on and you'll see these incredible looking women. So if he never actually did it in the >> context of him being allowed to do that, >> listen. Listen. So if he never actually did it, okay, then what is the opportunity that he would have had to see them when they had no clothes on in a space with no men around while they were getting undressed and changing? Okay, this statement alone proves you wrong because the only opportunity that he would have had to see this is if he did it. Third grader could understand this. Am I allowed to speak now? >> If you respond specifically to the question, I'll repeat it because you have a small brain. If he never actually did it, then what opportunity would he have had to see them with no clothes on in a space where they're getting undressed to change where there's no men around? >> The only >> What's that? >> He wouldn't have an opportunity. >> Exactly. If he never actually did it, then he would have never had the opportunity to see them with no clothes on in a space with no men around while they were getting undressed. Okay. But in that clip, Donald Trump attested that he did see them when they had no clothes on. He said that they looked beautiful. He was even saying that he was asking them questions. So therefore, this necessarily implies that he did it. You're such a [ __ ] He never ACTUALLY SAID [laughter] YEAH. Crash out. 500 bucks, Grizz. $500. And he left. He left. He ran. HE OWE ME $500. YOU OWE ME $500. YO, Trump supporters, they come up here, they get deep fried. But oh my god. And honestly, and honestly, I just want to share this one little thing with you guys before we move on to the next guest. You seriously owe me $500. My Vinmo and my Cash App, uh, sorry, my my my PayPal are in the link in my bio. Send me my [ __ ] $500 right [ __ ] now, Grizz. But anyways, all right, I just want to make this one clear. All right, I don't like that wasn't even like a, oh, hyper intelligent Dean cooks MAGA moment. That was literally Dean describing common sense.