Transcription
Good evening folks. This is a video about all the evidence that the sun is a recurring micro Nova Star. We piece together various previous videos, and at the end, you will possess all the terrifying evidence that what's happened before did in fact happen, and is about to happen again.
Let's begin with the idea that the sun is the cause of the impactors. As well, it was not a comet twelve thousand years ago. The impactors that happened on these twelve thousand year cycles are from the Sun. We'll hit this once now and again in the remaining evidence. But first, it is thought that nearly the whole Sun shell is blasted outward, ending up making a solar system that looks like this.
But forget the model, because we now have the best image: recurring Nova. And it's what they think they would see if they could see them all. This, well, this rapidly cycling Nova has produced a debris field of densely compacted blobs spread over an area one light year across. These are the remnants of not only six such recurring Nova at this star, the ones we've seen, but all of the ones that came before. NASA describes it as a shotgun blast debris. They expect there to be pieces the size of mega planets to the size of dust, which is why the fully realized debris field looks like this. According to the evidence, any planets in orbit would have been blasted like a shotgun of heavy material, the heavier elements too, like carbon, iron, lithium, and more.
When you hear the word Nova, most think of supernova, the violent endings of stars. Many don't know that some Supernova leave behind a star, and sometimes more than one. Most don't know that the vast majority of Nova events are not Supernova, but smaller versions called cataclysmic variables. They're classified as either classical Nova, dwarf Nova, or rapidly recurrent Nova, although all three are thought to be repeating on various time scales, from one in Andromeda that were currently Nova's every Earth year, to some classical Nova that are on millions of years for current scales. The scenario where one star feeds off another, accretes an atmospheric layer, and the interior pressure builds to Nova is said to occur for some kinds of supernova, and all classical Nova, and all rapidly recurrent Nova.
But this paradigm has come crashing down so fast, it's not even in the textbooks yet. Stars without a degenerate binary requiring tweaks to mechanisms. The one about sporadic accretion Nova is exceptional because the implications are the short-term events could replace a binary star. The poor little star that wandered into a molecular cloud and exploded all by itself is an exceptional example, one of those short-term events, along with the other so-called dark Nova remnants discovered since that initial discovery. And then there were the single star Nova events. This one observers may recall was a supernova, and to this day, almost no binaries are observed at the smaller Nova events. It's all theoretical. How many of those smaller ones are singles? When we look at Nova remnants, so often there is that star left behind in the middle. The explanation for there only being one is that the other one exploded or was blasted out of the system. But how many were singles to begin with?
In the last few years, we have seen the Nova science get very weird, and that's being polite. At the Supernova level, the dozens of names for small transient events are almost all said to be interaction-driven accretion, exchange of material, and reaction, just like the outburst of an active Galactic nucleus when it shreds and eats a star. With several studies showing how non-accretion events can actually trigger a Nova, specifically in the way the plasma turbulence disrupts and kicks the magnetic system of the star, the mechanisms to trigger a Nova are expanding like milk spilled on the kitchen floor. Just look at these planetary nebula, a spectacularly awful name for a Nova remnant, by the way. Do they look like there is just a tiny window of mechanisms? Every star is different in size, chemistry, magnetism, and more. Those with binaries have different sizes and compositions and orbital distances and accretion rates. The others encounter things like plasma, dust, and gas clouds, or magnetic disruptions of other kinds. It looks like the faces of Nova events are as broad as milk spilled on the kitchen floor.
One in particular that is said to be specifically different in terms of its character is the dwarf Nova. Dwarf Nova are said to not occur on the star, but in the accretion disk around the star. These have lower energy, so they need a way to explain how that could happen, which is why they look to the accretion disk. But they also need to explain a variety of dwarf Nova scenarios, as is done with many other Nova. Dwarf Nova come in various flavors themselves, sometimes masquerading as an imposter. They tend to clump all the low energy events into a nova-like event category with dwarf Nova, type 1 x-ray burst, dust production events, outer layer sheddings, mass loss events, luminous transients, and many other names. Truth is, while they have seen many discs around stars, they've never seen one then produce a dwarf Nova, and at no dwarf Nova ever have they seen the resolution needed to resolve a disc of any kind. It's all theory to try to make up for how small anovas they're seeing in the cosmos.
Now that we've spilled the Nova milk, literally everywhere, let's ask how powerful Nova events really are. Well, you can find the Supernova and hypernova rising to 10 to the 48 ergs or more. But for the surprise of Nova events, we have to explore the lower end of the range. We have long known that some small Nova are only as strong as super flares on our sun. We have seen many that are much lower, with several reaching down to the 10 to the 31 or 30 ERG range, and maybe even lower. They are also finding Supernova that are so small, they challenge the mechanisms of those bigger blasts as well. The big effect described by NASA here is on the models. Right now, the Nova energy range from hypernova down to the smallest recognized Nova events is already quite large. Now, keep that lower end in mind as we come to the Sun for a moment. The 1859 Carrington event super flare was 10 to the 32 ergs, bigger than literally dozens of officially recognized Nova. The Centennial level storms two match the lowest range. Some Nova are no bigger than what the sun does every 11 years in solar flaring x-ray energy. That's a small Nova, and the sun's maximum power range is likely well above that, a hundred to a thousand times. This is the consensus of not only recent Journal literature, but the recent authoritative book from the American Geophysical Union on the subject. And the sun is not even a powerful super flare star. We've seen super flares on other stars up to 10 to the 40 ergs, 10 million times more powerful than the sun's flares, much higher than many Nova events.
This is a fun little graphic that can help show you that flaring events on stars and Nova events have a ton of crossover in the energy range. Across the bottom is the 10 to the number of ergs. While Supernova still reach the highest ranges, it's a lot more of a mix in those lower ranges than most think of when they think of the word Nova. You can see here that the idea of these being superiorly different in terms of power is definitely false.
And as if the low level of energy to small Nova isn't surprising enough, that's just those they officially call Nova. What about those other events, super far away, where they give one of the other random names based on a light curve and no close-end images of the system? If some Supernova eruptions can't even destroy the planets around them, certainly the smaller Nova are going to leave their planets as well. What about the Nova event they saw with no ejection at all? The no Nova Nova. They continued to discover little ones they had missed before as the technology gets better. After a few years, what else are they likely to discover? Using retired satellites, they're already stacking images and finding over half the Nova were missed, just as was in the story from this past week.
And then there are all those stars that darken, that blink out, and then come back on. There are many more than you think. Some blamed on exoplanets, and some surely are exoplanets, but not all. What about Betelgeuse, which dimmed, re-brightened without a Nova event? Another star that blinked. Folks, the Nova scale might have to go all the way down to an event where an accreted or accumulated layer blocks out the starlight, and then the pushing off of that outer shell is slow and gradual, such that it seems that there is no luminosity, no Nova event, just the dust ejection. In fact, those could have solar flare level energies associated, but such observing campaigns are almost never done. And from this perspective, when you think about a small novel with no ejection on one side of a scale, and the small Anova that are just blinkers with no luminosity on the other, the Nova at a pulsar type 1 x-ray burst, which wouldn't even reach Mercury if it happened on the sun, doesn't even seem so weird anymore. The point is that Nova are much broader an actor than most believe, like milk spilled on the kitchen floor, and that's before the cleanup of what astronomy still considers new discovery down to the no ejection Nova and the stars that blink.
So again, there have been several new types of Nova discovered, and that's before you remember they give other names to other ones due to how variable they can be. They obviously look so different from one another that a wide array of progenitor scenarios is probable. But now comes the hard part. Could we take what was truly decades worth of scientific change in only a matter of years, and then outdo that in just one year? I won't be as worthy as last year's video. Are you ready? Just one week after that video, another new type of supernova was discovered. After several more dwarf Nova proved challenging to classify, another new type of Novel was discovered. Two more in less than a year, and more this decade than in the last century. There have been more discoveries like the no ejection Nova and more dimmings in the past, reviewed again in light of the Blinking Star, no luminosity Nova events. It is firmly established that the circumstellar medium is a perfectly good descriptor of the accrediting material, since a binary star is no longer absolutely required. This is already how many dwarf Nova are said to work. Why would it be any different or matter where that extra material comes from? Indeed, it is now firmly supported that many of the known Nova may be singles. And this is the first study and survey of its kind with modern level technology. Any guesses what subsequent studies will find with giant Stars blinking or plainly having their repeated Nova events visible? We now have the range of known recurring Nova on Stars smaller than the sun, larger than the sun, with and without binaries, above, below, left, right, in front, and behind the Sun. And let's just go ahead and add on a third new type of Nova from the last year. That's right, the micro Nova. The word we invented several years ago, the one that's got us called everything from crazy to pseudoscientists and worse, turns out is a thing. The immediate focus is on the binary production, and one can't be too mad at their going with the long-favored explanation for extra material getting dumped onto a star. And as we've said, that surely does work as a mechanism, but again, a binary is not required for other Nova, and it's not required for a micro Nova, just a source of extra material in the stellar atmosphere. Micronova makes another new kind of Nova, and a cherry on top, as they're even discovering new kinds of stars. Yeah, this is what a scientific field and upheaval looks like.
Speaking of extra material at a star, just so happens that we know what dumping material down through our Sun's Corona will do: trigger mass ejections. This is just one of several papers on the topic recently. Coronal rain triggering the ejections, and why would it be any different of a triggering than when it happens across an entire star? An anova occurs. By the way, this entire concept of accumulated material causing eruptions means Sun diving comets can cause solar eruptions too. So folks, that is what it looks like when there is a revolutionary epic of a scientific field, and then an even more impressive version occurs in less than one year, all while arriving at the same conclusion as we do from geophysical evidence and Galactic astrophysics. The sun can Nova too. It has many times at micro Nova level, and will again at the end of the current age of Earth, which well over half of you watching will be alive to see.
I don't know what this is, uh, again here at me Houston, but I'm gonna pick it up because, uh, anything that stares after you, better pick up. It's, it's a blast. But, uh, in this sunlight, it's reflected red, green light like a rainbow down the first prism on the moon. John, or something like that. Uh, 10 rock frags, a couple of which are, one of which is some interesting black glass along the sides of it. The other which is covered with black glass and, uh, maybe a little glass beads all over the place here. John, oh boy, that was a, one of those factors that's all included with the glass. The fracture set, I think the answer on this one will be pretty interesting. There's a rock of glass bladder all over its body. Hey Tony, I just picked up one that, uh, it said back 15. That is, uh, has a black matrix, bluish black matrix with a lamp like, uh, either glass or, uh, Phoenix did it. And, uh, it's right behind the limb here. I don't know where that's what we're looking for or not. Okay, that sounds good, Charlie. This seems to be one of the main reasons, in fact, all these missions talk about this. They talk about this, this glass, uh, debris, samples of picking up on the moon, which makes me believe that they were out there looking for glass bladders. They were looking for evidence of solar effects on the moon. And I think that the Chinese went up there on the far side of the moon and exactly the same thing. Young set up an UltraViolet camera to provide the first astronomical observations from the Moon. He took pictures of the Earth's upper atmosphere and magnetosphere and their interaction with the solar wind. They look like drill holes, is what they look like. You do that West Texas and you get a rattlesnake. Here you get eternally shattered soil. How about rolling that one over? [Applause] In it, stars that naked, but exactly. Yeah, in fact, uh, Tony, uh, the whole area, there's a lot of this rock. There's a lot of this rock here. These are interesting because they had a glazed surface on top. A six four four five five sample. It was this glazed top on it, and then in another part of that sample, there were all these pellet shots in it. So we see that these things have occurred not once, not twice, maybe many times that the glass splatters are happening on these rocks, and then another time you get more of these impacts. And we're seeing this in these samples on the moon. I think it's a very, very strong evidence path that our son as a micro Nova event on a very regular period of time, and that we're seeing these samples on the moon, uh, as evidence of these events. [Applause] Bladder, but yeah, the whole big bubble of it. Yeah.
In the Hubble time lapse of V838, which is the Monoceros Nova that happened back in 2002 or one or two, when they started recording this over a foreign five-year period, you see this huge expanding shell of matter coming off the star. It didn't Supernova and destroy itself. The star is still there, but there's this huge shell that's expanding out into space, an enormous amount of debris. It would be the most dynamic coronal mass ejection in modern history, recreating its spectrum through plasma interaction as it expands and cools. The shockwave has the chance to be the two in a one-two punch.
In the last episode, we discussed how a super flare or micro Nova creates electric wind of cosmic rays, how those could create geomagnetic storms that would take out global power. But in space weather, the biggest concern is the double impact, the consecutive shock scenario. And in the case of a micronova, or even the super flares that mainstream science says are possible on the Sun every few thousand years, there is a concern for the lower level L shell magnetic fields, the smaller arches, instead of the global fields connecting to the polar regions. In most solar blasts, even the worst ones we only see every decade or so, now the magnetosphere of Earth compresses down to those outer L shells, but still connects to the polar region in the most exposed outer zones. But in the extreme scenario, it could be very different. The modeling of the great solar storm of 1859, for example, which lit telegraph wires on fire and shocked operators, came close to hitting the lowest level L shells. And if that were to actually happen on Earth in a super flare or micronova, then you get the potential for a magnetar type discharge where its own processes are thought to surge energy through its L-shell fields, arc down, and literally crack the surface of the star. At that point, the loss of power grids might be one of the lesser concerns.
As for the electric geology, lab results confirmed this action on terrestrial planets. Education is something that has been found in the archaeological record, which is very mysterious in this sense of how do you explain it. What it is, is surface melting and re-congealing. I'll call that way, refreezing of rock surfaces. This is known, um, throughout parts of Europe and getting into Turkey and Syria. This gets back to something that Thomas Gould was talking about and hypothesized in the 60s, that during a major, major solar outburst, you would have in certain areas, sort of like a tornado, not everywhere, but certain areas, huge, we could think of as huge thunderbolts or lightning bolts actually hitting the surface. And I believe we found it. You also find that in parts of the Sahara, for instance. If, because I gave you a nice, but again, remember people in the U.S. government saw the sun flare up and get information back from the, the moon. When we brought the stuff back, they were mostly, the sun does something terrible. They didn't know when they felt they had no power to change it. You see, our tools have have shown us things that they couldn't have possibly seen 50 and 70 years ago. It was cycles upon cycles upon cycles. Anybody knows computers know that synchronizing and re-synchronizing frequencies and computers. So the point is, the less you look at the universe as information, you can never figure any of this stuff out.
To accept the challenge to explain all the evidence of catastrophes on Earth is to come to know that we must look outside the Earth for their cause, to look at Galactic astrophysics and astrophysical plasma. The conclusion delivers one right back to an event that can explain all of that evidence. The only explanation for all the evidence, the inevitable conclusion of the space science, a cyclical long period recurrent solar micronova. It will begin out in space at the galactic level where the Parker plasma instability runs through the galactic disk. Scientists have understood the physics of this Rippling current sheet for some time, its existence at the galactic and Stellar level, and yet the implications for this plasma magnetic geometry within the Galaxy is not well explored. When it interacts with a star, the sheet itself is a bit of a challenging thing to get your head around, but it is indeed an electric double layer. This has been known to run with the Parker instability again for many years, including how they surround equatorial regions of spinning sphere magnets in space, and the magnetic fields run opposite directions above and below the double layer sheet. This lab and theoretical science has already been well studied at the solar system level. The magnetic fields of the sun draped to the current sheet and have opposite directions on the north versus Southern Hemispheres. Now, even while the solar wind emanates in all directions, those magnetic fields in one hemisphere of the sun do always come back, and those hemispheres flip every 11 years. So the best way to imagine this current sheet is to put yourself right in the middle of it. Opposite fields on either side of the sheet, and invisibly populating the entire interior is a magnetically neutral collisionless plasma, which is why astrospheres look like the Earth magnetic field being blown back by the solar wind. It's the same thing in the Galaxy, but it's the galactic ion wind and Galactic magnetic fields interacting. Since there are not CME like structures in the galactic plane, the crossings of the galactic current sheet are pretty much all you get in terms of Galactic space weather. We know from theory, lab work, and from observations of the solar wind plasma that these crossings include a density component. That's the magnetic flip in the solar wind in blue, and look at the spike, straight line jump up in solar wind density below in orange. Now, from 3 to 10 protons per cubic centimeter might not seem like much, but that's more than a tripling of the density. And at the galactic level, there's much more dust as well. This density component will not only be plasmic like in the solar wind, but will contain lots of gas and dust as well, swept up in the electromagnetic waveform.
It is already well known that this is a Nova trigger event. In fact, they believe many known Nova and recurrent Nova events are due to too much material getting into that star's atmosphere, blocking the vent, so to speak, causing a runaway explosive event from the plasma pressure and temperature within. But, but that's not all. Astronomers now largely recognize the plasma instability trigger for Nova events. Any electromagnetic event at the sun could cause major solar wind enhancement or interruption, which could not only trigger an outburst outright, that would be the former situation, but if it interrupts it, the latter situation, material will build in the Solar atmosphere, and we're right back to trigger number one. Both come with the electromagnetic current shade of the Galaxy, which we believe to cross the sun's path every 10 to 15,000 years.
Now, since it's not only possible, plausible, but perhaps downright expected at stars, and during the galactic current sheet, what does the other side of the evidence say about a solar micronova? Well, there are five core pieces of evidence that seem to be present almost every time we have this cycle on Earth. The first two are not difficult to explain with the solar micronova. Extinctions can flow from various types of events, and the shell release on our star could not only push meteors out of their orbits, but also the shell itself could have pieces congeal and coalesce into impactors. Where we begin to knead the Nova and see its ability to explain the cycle is the glaciation paradox. Ice is deposited fast, very fast. And to do this, you need to evaporate tons of water with heat, or with more volatility if you use induced electricity, and then you need cold to freeze it. Well, the heat aspect of the micronova, not really hard to imagine. But then the evaporated water cloud albedo would do a good job cooling the planet. Then also, the primary production in Nova events is dust, and that dust will act like a volcanic winter at the top of the atmosphere, not to mention it will likely be clouding the inner solar system too. Not hard to get a drop in temperature when you consider the leftover elements of the micro Nova.
Either there is no doubt that the magnetic reversal is where the micro Nova begins to separate itself. It's not just the Gothenburg magnetic Excursion 12,000 years ago and the Younger Dryas impactors seeming to line up in time, but that's the case at each of the magnetic Excursion events, every 10 to 15,000 years into the past. The impactors can't flip the Earth's field, but the micronova can do the impactors and the flipping. The application of a strong electric field can flip the polarity of an entire object within that electric field. This is basic physics, and now we're talking about the micro Nova electric field and charged particles, and the Earth is the object within it. In fact, this animation showing a concentric shock wave flipping Earth's fields in red comes from a university government partnership at NCAR.
Finally, the Nova Isotopes, the ones impactors can't explain and would show up in microtectites and bone of the animals that fell during these events. How I put it in the June 29th Morning News was about as good as I can put it. One of the few lines of evidence that leads us right back to a cyclical Nova event at our star is that there are isotopes from these past events. They try to peg on impactors, but there are also isotopes that are too extreme, even for something like what they envision killed the dinosaurs. Those, they say, came from a very nearby Nova event sometime after our solar system formed. Now, they come to that conclusion because these isotopes must have been formed in Nova, but they have short half-lives. They wouldn't have survived from before our sun formed. And if it was from a far away star, it would take too long for the Isotopes and dust its riding to get here. And again, the half-life problem. They have explained this using Interstellar dust expelled by Nova, not unlike the dusty plasma that falls to Earth to this day. Again, that article from yesterday. But this year, that theory ran into a major problem that plasma physics could have informed them of decades ago, if they appreciated it. And it is that those grains of dust are not going to be delivered from anywhere except right here. They cannot escape the shock wave of the Nova, and so delivery by some other star is not possible. It's got to be from within the heart of the event. Now, this would imply that the ancient Nova that proceeded, seeded, and triggered the formation and or ignition of our sun was to blame, since we are in its heart. But again, we run into the half-life problem, and that those Isotopes wouldn't be around today. And so we are left with but one explanation: our star, like billions of others, is an ultra long period recurrent micronova. It's bigger than a dwarf Nova and the Nova element of a type 1 x-ray burst, but still nowhere near a normal nova or supernova.
Whether we start at Galactic astrophysics, the long history of the catastrophe cycle, the geomagnetic evidence, or the Isotopes we looked at today, the story is the same. And so to review, with the astrophysics being what they are, this Galactic sheet we are short across on a regular cycle brings two Nova triggers to a solar wind outputting star. The only way to explain all the evidence of what happens to this planet on a cycle is the solar outburst. And there are three ways to get there from the geophysical evidence.
Folks, this graphic was used for a deeper look episode recently on our website called "Four Paths to the Micronova." It's a very advanced graphic for looking so simple. And veteran observers, test your catastrophism awareness with me here and see if you've got it, or you need to review. Starting top left, the galactic astrophysics is demanding the cyclical electromagnetic insult be there. We believe it's the Taurus jet model extending into the galactic current sheet, but the alternate theory that they are Galactic spiral shocks would work the same way. From our perspective, it's sort of a minutia point on the larger scale Galactic physics, but this is where our scalability from space weather, interplanetary magnetic field studies to the galactic scale comes in. And indeed, we have seen the nearby Stars activating in a line right towards the Sun, and we're next. Bottom left, the cyclical event shows up tremendously in Earth cycle data. The Excursion cycle, the half cycle, Heinrich events, every 6,000 years. Earth is due for the next one. We are seeing it unfold now, and not just here in our magnetic field and climate, but throughout the solar system, all the planets and the Sun. Bottom right, when we investigate that evidence that come with those cycles, the magnetic Excursion, biosphere stress, climate impactors, volcanoes, the cyclical deluge, and the Nova level Isotopes, there's only one way to get all those things all together. And that brings us top right, where we specifically look to the astrophysics. And not only is their knowledge of Nova expanding to include a vastly larger range of events, but they think recent nearby Nova happened here. But the main issue is that the magnetic dusty pinballs carrying the Isotopes don't leave the remnant, they're trapped. And if we're in the remnant of a recent Supernova, Earth would be dead. This instead suggests it's the sun in a smaller recurrent micronova. The half cycle, 6,000 year event was discovered to be tied to the Sun as well. We've seen the solar chemistry begin to change too, and they said that's due to its changing magnetic fields.
Folks, this is four different paths to the solar flash and catastrophism, and we didn't even touch the religious mythology or plasma lab work done by Anthony Peratt. There is no hiding from the science at this point. You've heard how the galactic astrophysics dictates that the character of the current sheet brings multiple Nova triggers from magnetic disruption to material accumulation. And we have also seen this where they actually need Nova events to make the models and math match the observations of the current sheet. So it's not just suggested, it's needed to make it all work. We have only one way to explain all the Earth evidence: impactors, Nova level Isotopes, magnetic reversal, and more. And now we also know they can't call us crazy anymore for saying micro Nova exists, and that the sun's being in the exact center of a giant plasma bubble is probably no coincidence at all. Finally, the nearby stars have had their outbursts, and the solar system is changing quickly now, including the Sun and interplanetary space. We are due in time, right on the cycle, and everything you would expect to see with that cycle, and which is implied by the physics at work, is in fact happening now. That's about a hundred coincidences you would need to ignore on top of perfect math and model coming together to match observations.
What all these changes are leading to is the solar micronova. And while it won't destroy the Earth, it will take out several species and somewhere between 50 to 90 percent of humans. There's no hiding from this reality. And with it due sometime in the next 28 years, it's time to get ready. Because the one thing all survivors of the last event have in common, they seem to be preparing to hide from the sky. I'll see you in the morning for The Daily Show. Be safe, everyone.