Transcription
Hey everybody, Dr. G here. I'm a clinical and forensic psychologist as well as a body language expert. And today we're going to be analyzing the behavior and body language of Hillary Clinton. Before we get started with this, couple of quick things. One, I wanted to make sure you know this is not a psychological evaluation of any kind. These are just my opinions. In addition to that, I do want to remind you to like and subscribe if you want to see more content just like this. All right, let's go.
What we're going to be analyzing today is Hillary Clinton's deposition to the House Oversight Committee. I recently analyzed the press briefing that took place after this deposition. I also analyzed Bill Clinton's deposition where I determined that I thought he was lying through most of it. Now, we're going to look at her behavior and body language to see how she approached this deposition. All right, let's just jump right in.
>> Committee's investigation into the actions and investigations of Mr. Jeffrey Epste and Miss Galen Maxwell. I will enter the original subpoena and corresponding cover letter from August 5, 2025.
>> Now, this has only just begun, but you can already see tension in her face. So, I think we can expect that she's going to be quite irritable throughout this.
>> Six letter from David E. Kendall to Chairman Comr and Ranking Member Garcia. January 8, 2026. Letter from Chairman Comr to David E. Kendall.
>> Now, this right here is a look to show people that you're bored. She wants people to know how much she doesn't like having to do this. She wants people to know that she thinks it's frivolous. So, that very much is what she's trying to express with this body language right here.
>> January 12, 2026. Letter from Ashley Kalen and David E. Kendall to Chairman Comr. January 13, 2026. Letter from
>> What we're gonna do is we're gonna skip around. This is four and a half hours long. I'm just going to hit the highlights.
>> Mallerie, chief clerk and director of operations.
>> She's continuing to show body language to show what a waste of time she thinks this is. One of the differences in body language between her and Bill Clinton is that he looked very defensive from the outset. His chin was tucked in. He was doing all sorts of things to close his body off. and her body's a little bit closed off, but nowhere near as much as his.
>> Either communicated with Miss Maxwell, even if not directly yourself, but been around Miss Maxwell.
>> The best of my recollection is at the wedding in uh 2010.
>> Would you consider Miss Maxwell a friend?
>> No. Now, one thing you're going to notice with Hillary Clinton is that she exaggerates certain types of body language. So, if she's saying yes or no, she tends to exaggerate how long she shakes her or nods her head for. I've seen this previously when she's listening to somebody, she will constantly nod her head. When she says no, she will constantly shake her head. So, she is very aware of her body language.
>> A friend?
>> No.
>> Would you cons?
>> You see how she's continuing to do it?
>> Consider her a friend of President Clinton. He'll have to answer that.
>> This was interesting though. After she said he'll have to answer that, she's nodding her head. Now, we do accidentally sometimes leak out how we feel about something. So, I do think that the way that she sees Bill Clinton and Gla Maxwell as she sees them as friends. Just watch her head not after this.
>> He'll have to answer that
>> room. Can you please advise me as to whether or not that's permissible and consistent with the rules, particularly given that we have asked for a public hearing if there are photos that are being
>> Now, one thing I want you to pay attention to is her body language right now. You see she's smiling, but you're going to see in a second she's very angry. So, she covers she masks her feelings with this facial expression right here
>> of the secretary as she is testifying. Can you please explain how that
>> I'm done with this? If you guys are
>> So, you hear that level of anger that's coming out as she says this. You see her body opening up. So, she does use her body this way when she wants to be emphatic. She pulls her hands out. She opens up. You hear the anger, but you don't see it. She's very, very good at masking the anger on her face other than showing no emotion. She's obviously been doing that the whole time, which appears angry, but you're not seeing it in the brow. You're not seeing overt signs of anger. It's more subtle signs.
>> Least of the secretary as she is testifying. Can you please explain how that
>> I'm done with this? If you guys are doing that, I am done. You can hold me. See, now you're starting to see a sneer as she's talking, but she's trying to keep on a mask. I don't think she wants to show that. It seems like she's trying very hard to not appear angry, even though she sounds quite angry. But watch her mouth right here.
>> That are being released of the secretary as she is testifying. Can you please explain how that
>> I'm done with this? If you guys are doing that, I am.
>> So, you can see the beginning of a sneer right here.
>> I am.
>> And right here, this shows real anger right there. She's bearing her teeth. She's sneering. She's clearly very angry, but she's trying her best to rein that look in.
>> You can hold me in contempt from now until the cows come home. This is just typical behavior.
>> Oh, for heaven.
>> So, I would like to understand how that's permissible.
>> See, and she slapped the desk. When she's really feeling strongly about something, she can be emphatic, but she's been trying to give as little as possible throughout this, which lends credence to the possibility that at times she's being deceptive.
>> Last one. Oh, for heaven.
>> So, I would like to understand how that's permissible
>> before the hearing was.
>> It doesn't matter. We all are abiding by the same rules.
>> I I will take that down.
>> Yeah. Well,
>> I would like to take a break at this moment. I'd like to have
>> for now.
>> Go off the record. Go off the record.
>> See, she even picked up the chair and dropped it.
>> Furiosity is what we're seeing, but you're not seeing much of it on the face. She really is good at at hiding the look of anger. Have you ever Googled your own name or email address? Before I had Aura, I did. And wow, it was my full name, my old address, phone number, all sorts of information I did not want people to have. That's why I started using Aura, today's sponsor. If you've ever wondered how scammers get your number or why your inbox is drowning in spam, this is why. They're companies called data brokers that collect and sell your personal information to marketers, scammers, and yes, even stalkers. They do it without your permission. The good news is they're legally required to remove it if you ask. The only issue is that it's timeconuming and they make it as confusing as humanly possible. This is where Ara comes in. They take care of the hard part for you. Automatically requesting removals from these data broker sites and keeping your info off of them over time. In the first two weeks, you'll see exactly where your personal data is exposed and start watching it disappear without you lifting a finger. It's an all-in-one digital security tool that gives you alerts if your personal info appears on the dark web, real-time fraud alerts for crediting and banking, 247 identity monitoring, a secure VPN, antivirus, password manager, and more. Plus, a $5 million identity theft insurance policy, and US-based fraud experts available around the clock. You can try Aura free for 14 days at aura.com/dg. That's enough time for Aura to start scrubbing your info off all of these data broker sites automatically. I'm not leaving myself vulnerable, and you shouldn't either. Go to aura.com/drg and get started with your 14-day trial today. All right, back to the analysis.
>> How often would
>> One thing you may be noticing is that she's not moving around a lot outside of her head. Her arms are locked in place. She's sitting very still. And we typically do that when we're not trying to emphasize something. If we're really feeling strongly about something, we tend to emphasize it. But we use our hands. She's somebody that speaks with her hands sometimes, but right now she's trying to get through these questions. And the reason that starts to look like deception is that why is it that these questions feel so grave? Why is it that just answering yes or no feels so intense? And so it's interesting to see how still her body language is? Because if you think about it in a very primal sense, if there's danger around, we sit still initially to hide. And so people can sometimes get stuck in that freeze response. Did
>> your daughter have seen Miss Maxwell?
>> I have no idea. Have you ever met Jeffrey Epstein?
>> I do not recall ever meeting Jeffrey Epstein in preparation for this uh hearing. I was told that he attended an event at the White House uh that was put on by the White House.
>> Now, this is something I pointed out during her press briefing. The ums and are starting to come out now. She's not somebody that needs that type of hesitation when she speaks. She doesn't typically do it. So this once again l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l lends itself to some likely deception here as she's responding to this these ums and a's for her in particular because she's a public speaker and she's very practiced at this it's very noticeable she's also less engaged you see she's looking away there's a lot about this that suggests that there is that this is not entirely true
>> Jeffrey Epstein in preparation for this uh hearing I was told that he attended an event at the white house uh that was put on by the white house historical assoc association. Um, but I have no recollection of that.
>> And then the look down afterwards that typically signifies a loss of confidence. Responding to this question was followed by a loss of confidence, which once again lends itself to likely deception,
>> but I have no recollection of that. You see the discomfort? Rather than responding and continuing to look at the person that's asking the questions, she's continuing to look down at her hands. Her head continues to drop. Continues to be a loss of confidence here.
>> Before her crimes became public, did you have any knowledge of the sexual that Galain Maxwell was committing and facilitating against girls and young women?
>> No.
>> Now, you'll notice she said no when she's nodding her head. Now, when she's listening to people, she nods. But typically when we say no, our head automatically shakes. So it is interesting that after she said no, she continues to nod her head.
>> Facilitating against girls and young women.
>> No.
>> Our colleagues have suggested that they need to speak with you because
>> you'll also notice that she's breathing very heavily right now as she's getting through these questions. I've talked before about that that freeze response. As you can see, when she's feeling strongly about something, she gets emphatic. right now as she's responding to this, she's calm to the point of it looking like she's wanting to avoid responding to this question.
>> Our colleagues have suggested that they
>> but you can see her breathing fast means her heart rate is picking up which once again suggests that she's feeling a lot of discomfort responding to these questions
>> and young women. No,
>> our colleagues have suggested that they need to speak with you because Galain Maxwell's nephew,
>> Secretary Clinton, why is it important for you to testify before this committee in a public setting?
>> Well, first of all, I believe in public testimony. I believe that the public has a right to know uh what its elected uh members of Congress are investigating and legislating. Having served for eight years, I think it is useful as a member.
>> What I want you to focus on right here is how different her body language is right here when she's talking about something she feels passionately about as opposed to when she's responding to these questions. When she's denying that she has any knowledge of Jeffrey Epste, when she's denying that she knows much of anything about Gla Maxwell. All of those look very, very different than something like this right here. You're going to learn things by the coverage of it, by the response that you get from people. You know, this hearing, if it were in public, maybe somebody your question about intelligence, maybe somebody watching it would have said, "Oh my gosh, I just remembered having a conversation with
>> it's like night and day watching her when she's feeling passionate and wants people to hear what she's saying versus when she's responding to the questions she's been asked so far." This so remarkably different. foreign minister X or Prime Minister Y and that person mentioned Jeffrey Epstein. Most people are not going to look at the video. They're not going to read the transcript, but they will follow a live public hearing.
>> How do you know Howard Lutnik? I know Howard Lutnik because when I was senator on 911, the firm he headed, Caner Fitzgerald, suffered the greatest loss of life. As I recall, something like 650 of his employees were murdered by terrorists that day. Howard Lutnik missed being a victim because he was delayed dropping his child off to kindergarten. If you ask the question, I'm going to answer your question. This was what I spent my time doing. I am a survivor trying to look out for other survivors trying
>> and I was taking care of the people who lost thousand lives and now you're being trade center today.
>> You asked me about
>> So, as she's talking about 911, there clearly are a lot of feelings here and that's what's eliciting strong reactions from her. She doesn't seem to have as many strong reactions about Jeffrey Epstein's victims, which is interesting. But this seems to get her feeling very defensive, and it also has her when she's talking about 9/11, it has her very passionate.
>> When did you first learn of Mr. Epstein's arrest in 2019?
>> Probably when it happened because it was headline news. I'm sure I like everybody else saw it in the press.
>> And in seeing that in the press, did you
>> Now, oddly enough, right here, it doesn't seem to be that she's answering this directly. Watch this body language right here. I want you to look at her left shoulder.
>> 19
>> probably when it happened cuz it was headline news. I'm sure I like everybody else.
>> So, you saw one small shoulder shrug. Now, typically when we're really feeling like we don't know something, we lift both shoulders. But this was only a one shoulder shrug, which tends to mean that we're holding back. Very interesting. Not something I would have expected right here.
>> 2019.
>> Probably when it happened because it was headline news. I'm sure I like everybody else. President Clinton took trips on Mr. Epstein's jet. Is that correct?
>> Yes.
>> Would you consider offering a private jet as a donation in kind to the foundation?
>> Well, I don't know what the the rules are under the 501c3 regulations, but it was certainly uh a gift and he was, you know, one of a number of people who provided transportation uh so that Bill could do the work he was doing. Now, right after she responds to this question, she she bites her lip, licks her lips. There's both anger and anxiety below this do the working. People who provided transportation uh so that Bill could do the work he was doing. When you saw photos of your husband in a hot tub laying on a beach and getting massaged by other women, and you knew that Jeffrey Epste was involved in some of these trips and these things, did it concern you at all?
>> Now, if you watch the corners of her mouth, you can see that she's trying to hold back a smile because when she is feeling defensive, she tends to smile to cover how she's actually feeling. And she's resisting doing that right now. But I want you to watch the corners of her mouth. Um, when you saw photos of your husband in a hot tub laying on a beach and getting massaged by other women and you knew that Jeffrey Epstein was involved in some of these trips and these things, did it concern you at all?
>> I'm here not to offer my opinions. I'm here to answer specific questions to the best of my ability
>> when you saw your husband in these photos with the young woman being massaged.
>> Now, you can tell because of the way that she said that, that was a prepared statement. So, she had already thought about these questions getting asked, obviously, and this is how she had decided she was going to respond to them. You can tell by the robotic nature of how she's saying it that this is a very much very precisely phrased statement.
>> Trips and these things. Did it concern you at all?
>> I'm here not to offer my opinions. I'm here to answer specific questions to the best of my ability.
>> When you saw your husband in these photos with young women being massaged, what went through your mind?
>> I am not going to speculate.
>> You didn't have any feelings about young women massaging your husband. I am not going to offer opinions or speculation about anything that I have no context for and was not there.
>> It's very interesting that she's responding that she will not speculate because she's not being asked to speculate. She's asking how she felt. But you can see with the with the body language she's shutting down. She's not moving. She's trying to give as little as humanly possible right now. But her her argument is very unusual because she's saying, "I don't want to speculate on anything that I wasn't a part of." But she's just asking how she feels about these things or how she felt about these things.
>> Did you ever vet the wedding guests of your daughter's wedding? Did you know Glen Maxwell was coming?
>> She came as Ted Wait's guest.
>> But did you You're a former first lady, former senator, former secretary of state. You didn't vet individuals.
>> So when she was asked this, you'll watch. She cleared her throat and then she backed up. That's a way to disengage. She doesn't like having to answer this question directly and she's not answering it directly, actually.
>> The wedding guests of your daughter's wedding. Did you know Glen Maxwell was coming? She came as Ted Weight's guest.
>> But did you You're a former first lady, former senator, former secretary of state. You didn't bet individuals at events for your daughter.
>> This was filed when?
>> So, would it have been 2024?
>> Yeah. Well, the wedding was 2010.
>> I moved on to another question about um the wedding, but I know that the chairman
>> All right, let's go and wrap things up here. Hopefully, this is helping you better understand some of the behavior and body language we saw from Hillary Clinton today. Bill Clinton's body language was quite different. He was clearly very defensive throughout. He also was very stressed and anxious throughout, something she didn't show as much of. There were also times where I believe he was being very deceptive. Now, her body language was focused more on giving nothing. She got angry at times, but for the most part, she was trying to give as little as possible. So, her strategically was very different. That being said, I think there were also times where she was being deceptive. There were times where she was being less than forthcoming or times where she would sidestep the question and really not answer it. The degree is very different though for her. I think she's trying to clean up her husband's mess. So, I think there's times where she knows more, but nowhere near as much as Bill Clinton knows. But it doesn't change the fact there were times where I think she was withholding information or holding back things that she knew more about. Like whether or not Glain Maxwell was coming to her daughter's wedding. She sidestepped that question entirely and rather than answering it, found a way out of it. Now, there's plenty more I could analyze. I really just tried to cover some of the highlights, but if you have any other thoughts or if there's anything else you want me to analyze, please let me know in the comments below. Last thing before we get finished up is I do want to remind you to like and subscribe if you want to see more content just like this. All right, thanks for watching.