Transcription
Very excited now to be joined by our great friend of the show, Professor Robert Paper of the University of Chicago. It's good to see you, sir. Thanks for coming back.
>> Thank you so much for having me.
>> Absolutely. Let's go ahead and start with B1. This really uh caught our interest. Professor, curious for your reaction. The commander of the IRGCS force issued a very interesting statement yesterday. He said that they would establish a new security belt of resistance that from the straight of Hormuz to the Baba Mendub straight off of Yemen and then to the Gulf of to the Red Sea. According to these new comments by state media, they are now using the term resistance or axis of resistance to refer to Iranian allies in the region from Hezbollah to Yemen's Houthis. What do you make of this new term of the axis of resistance, this security belt comment in the context of everything that's been happening here in this war?
>> Uh, this is more evidence for the new stage of the war that we've entered into. We just passed day 100 of the Iran war. There is no end in sight. We are not at the end. We are in the middle game. And in the middle game, the most distinctive feature which has happened for weeks and this what you just showed is strong evidence of it is that Iran has moved from survival to ambition. Let me say that again. Iran is no longer just considering how does it survive. Iran is moving from survival to ambition. You see that in its behavior. You see that uh a week ago it responds to relatively minor strikes here by the US by upping the ante to put pressure on Kuwait and Baharrain. Uh they are not just doing tit fortat. They are using a version of their own escalation dominance to put pressure on those Gulf states to withdraw American forces from their territory. Almost at the same time they threaten Israel. You attack Hezbollah's strongholds in Beirut. That's Iran's key ally and Iran is going to punish, going to retaliate. This is part of that new red line that you just showed. They are extending an umbrella. They are not just worrying about survival in Thrron. They're extending an umbrella, a new architecture. That is a new ambition. And then last week, right at the end of last week, the senior adviser to the supreme leader made a statement almost identical to what you just showed except did not define the umbrella area so clearly use the same uh geographic space by the way, but not that clear set of red lines. So what you are seeing is that Iran is gaining has gained power in the opening stage. That's like the opening in chess. It has gained power. And in the middle game, it's not just happy going for a draw. It's going to extend that power in a more ambitious way. And that middle game with this new security architecture, and I'm glad to say a bit more about that, but this this middle game, this is going to go on folks through the summer. We are almost surely now going to have the new crisis in the world economy based on Iran's behavior and rhetoric. This is this is almost locked in. The the world may not fully expect it, but this is what you would expect. This is this is what the the direction of the modeling for the 20 years would would expect. And then I'm sorry to also say this is not just going to end on Labor Day. Donald Trump extended the naval blockade to Labor Day as if this is going to be over by Labor Day, which of course very convenient for him with the midterms. However, that's not where Iran's thinking is. If Iran can hurt its opponents through the midterms as the United States and also Israel Netanyahu has elections coming, it's going to take advantage of that. So we need to expect that this this middle game is going to go on through the summer through the U the new economic crisis into the fall and midterms and probably into January. That's the true middle game we are facing.
>> Wow. So if that's where Iran is, they've moved from survival to ambition. What is Trump's perspective? What are his thoughts? because we've been tracking on the show how you had the situation where uh Israel was struck by Iran. Trump tells a bunch of reporters, "I don't want Israel to retaliate." Then Israel retaliates anyway. Um he's now saying, "Oh, well, I understand that they had to do that limited strike." But now they're done. But of course, this morning we see headlines that they continue to strike inside of Lebanon. So in any case, what do you think is going on in terms of Trump's calculus and how all of that unfolded?
>> Yeah. So what Trump is uh doing first let's just explain as Iran has gained power America has lost strategic position. These are a direct tradeoff of each other. Trump's rhetoric and phone calls and and statements um are as if he was still the dominant power. He is acting as if he is still in control. In fact he has been saying I am in control. Well, the fact is Trump is losing control as his strategic position has declined. And control is not defined by what the actor President Trump says, I have control. It's defined by how others are reacting. So, point number one, um the Iranians have said, and this is what the uh adviser to the Supreme Leader said late last week, that they're just going to ignore what Trump says about negotiations. It it's not they're going to respond to it tit for tat. They're just ignoring him. They don't think it has any reality and they've laid out their their demands in public. Uh which means they're digging their heels in and they don't really care what President Trump says anymore. At least that's what that's what they've said and their behavior would reflect that. Israel also uh they're still taking Netanyahu is still taking President Trump's calls. Okay? So, I'm not saying that they've gone that far in not taking the call. They're taking the call. But Netanyahu did not follow Trump's uh orders. Trump tried to order Netanyahu not to retaliate. And what happened? Netanyahu launched air strikes on Iran in western and central Iran against some key targets. So this is the opposite of listening to President Trump. President Trump is losing control because his behavior and rhetoric has been as if he uh had not lost that strategic position.
>> Right. Well, in war, the realities dictate everything. You can try to have your happy talk and that's what President Trump is doing. Uh but this is being ignored because the happy talk is irrelevant. We all see the realities and that's true in much of the American public. That's true in uh the leadership and that is what why President Trump's words seem to have no reality to them. It's because there is no reality to his words. And we we we know this. What how long has it been? Let me just ask you how and the listeners should ask, how long has it been that they have heard President Trump say that the negotiations with Iran are just about to be settled? Well, I went back before we came on. I just thought I would just check for myself and this could be, you know, a game that listeners could do on Google. I found it goes back to March 29th. Okay. So that's 72 days of this. Now, if your listeners can, it's like beat the professor. Maybe I missed one before March 29th. So just let me know if they found one going back earlier than March 29th. But that's 72 days of almost every day or every other day hearing. We're only days away from the deal with Iran. So you could see as Iran's ambitions grow, as it extends its umbrella, it's spreading its wings, why he would be losing control.
>> Professor, you had a a prediction here or just a statement on our show many months ago. You said Iran has become a new regional world power. I I put that clip out. It got quite a lot of criticism mostly from the Israeli lobby. Uh and what I found fascinating actually is watching some of this proof out. And so yesterday when we saw Iran enforce its red line of strikes on Lebanon for the first time in its modern history to actually use that as a pretext explicitly to enforce regional action. How did that prove out that original statement that you made to watch such a change in their own strategic behavior?
>> Yeah. So to be clear, I made that public statement in a New York Times piece on April 4th, uh where I said Iran would is emerging as the fourth center of world power. And also to be clear, I didn't say that that would happen in a day. I said it would take about 18 months. They were on a trajectory to do that. Um and I didn't say they would become stronger than the United States. So some people, you know, when you get in these debates, they kind of straw man it a little bit to say over, you know, but Iran would be the fourth center of world power. Now, what did I mean by that? The United States is the strongest state in the world and it's a hegeimon in its region of the world, the western hemisphere. China is the second strongest and it wants to be and almost is a re a hegeimon in Asia. Uh Russia is the third strongest and it uh is um vying to become the hegeimon in Eastern Europe. That's what's happening with the battle with uh Ukraine. And who else is a hegeimon? There's no other regional hegeimons. Iran would be the fourth regional hegeimon in the Gulf. That is the dominant state in the Gulf. And what does that look like? that looks like a state which has a sphere of influence not just worrying about its own narrow protection and that's what's true of those all those other three states uh and also I uh I believe this will also mean that it will protect its allies and that's exactly what you are seeing here. So this is uh we're used to thinking of Hezbollah as like the puppet or the pawn that is expendable to support Iran. This is the other way around. This is Iran establishing a sphere of influence and it's also extending to the Houthi. So if you you there's a whole sphere here that is being defined. Um and that's a sphere of influence. uh and it is acting to do and by the way it's gaining success because its threats its stronger power compelled President Trump to make those phone calls to put pressure on Israel to pull back. And the fact is without Iran gaining power, Donald Trump would never have made those phone calls uh on the behavior just because uh Iran was making a threat. So you are seeing reality to that prediction I made two months ago and this will go on over time. I think I believe Iran's position as the fourth center of world power will emerge drip by drip by drip over the summer. This will get even stronger because as the crisis hits the world's economy, you know, basically end of June to July, we don't know the exact date, but we know that it's coming. Uh this will strengthen Iran's position in the region and also in the world. So you are seeing the emergence of a fourth center of world power right in front of our eyes. We've never I I don't I'm not surprised people uh were skeptical of this argument because we haven't seen that in our lifetime. When was the last time you saw the emergence of a fourth of a center of world power? Not in our lifetime that China happened very very slowly and was already a pretty powerful state. You have to go to back history. This is like Prussia in the 19th century to really kind of put this in in some historical perspective. So it's not truly unique and it's a function of not just the economy of Iran. That's how we often measure power just raw economy. It's it's the geography. It is the geography plus the technology that's what helped Prussia. So this is a little bit different calculus. We have seen uh bits of this before. Uh but I am not surprised there was some push back and I believe this is going to be one of the gigantic outcomes. It's going to reshape the world coming out of this war. This war is not like the Greenland issue. It's not like Venezuela. This is a different uh animal was always going to be a different animal. And I really appreciate the fact that I've been able to talk about this on your on your show. I also appreciate the New York Times taking the risk because they got enorous got hammered for it. Everybody said, "WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? THAT'S NO STUPID." But now you're seeing the reality. And by the way, that's just another prediction that's coming out of all this modeling, thinking about the bombing of Iran. This would not be happening had President Trump not bombed Iran.
>> Mhm. >> Well, it's fascinating because it's really attributable to this combination of modern military tech with the drones, etc., and also sort of old school just geographic position in the world. So, it really is this very unique um you know,
>> if I could just make a suggestion for your listeners because a lot of your listeners love they should go and look at a piece by Halford Mckender called the geographic pivot of history 1904. British geographer and they will see that yes it's not always been true we've measured great power simply by raw GDP
>> because that's how explained what was happening to Britain as Prussia was consolidating and why that geography mattered so much.
>> Well, one thing I wanted to ask you about is how this changed the game for Israel? you know, they have obviously they have our support. They've bombed something like seven countries over the past several years. Have de facto annexed parts of Syria. Um have de facto annexed, you know, most of Gaza, taken complete control over the West Bank, um have now invaded and taken control over parts of Lebanon and have been able to do all of this basically with impunity. You'd have to think that this new reality would, you know, constrain them quite significantly in ways that they aren't used to in recent years.
>> Uh that that's it's going to and it's going to constrain them more over time and I will be writing pieces about this on on the Substack by the way. Um because it is it's part of the new emerging reality. But don't think that it's going to stop all at once, but you're seeing the beginning of this change now. So what you can expect over time is as that new security architecture becomes solidified and it's only in its early stages. As it becomes solidified, Israel's position is going to get weaker and weaker and weaker. Now that's going to happen for two reasons, not just one reason. Reason number one is Israel's strategic position uh is a function uh very heavily of America's strategic position. So as America's strategic position weakens in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf and it is weakening at now this inherently weakens Israel's position. But number two, what's going to happen very uh as time goes on is you will see evolutions with uh the drone and missile capability of Iran's proxy. So the uh it's we already know that Hezblah and the Houthis have missile and drone capability. That's that's not the change. The change, and you're starting to see it just in the last 24 hours, is much more sophisticated, concerted effort with those missiles and drones to think in a calibrated way how to weaken Israel. And so what you see is that we had the issue of course with Israel, Lebanon, everybody's focused on that. But I have been watching the Red Sea and the Houthies and what and I haven't been surprised by what I found what we saw in the last 24 hours which is that the Houthies have stepped into this part this this issue and what they have done is they are threatening any Israeli related traffic uh around the Red Sea that choke point well that is now an expansion to that new theater. Think of it as a new uh uh part of the of the theater here. A new area that is now uh expanding in a coherent way just as your opening quote suggested. And that is going to weaken Israel over time because those drones, those missiles can be used in a much more concerted way. And this is just the beginning for Israel. And notice that if America and Israel together couldn't root out all the drones and missiles here, as America gets weaker and its position gets weaker in the Middle East, Israel on its own is not going to be able to do that either. So, so this is a this is a a picture of a grand strategic um uh uh not not quite collapse but re uh kind of reduction here a decline for Israel over time and but you're just seeing the early stages of this and this trajectory is likely to go on as far as the eye can see.
>> as always thoughtprovoking and uh usually correct uh on a long timeline. So, thank you very much sir. We appreciate your time.
>> Thank you so much for having me.
>> Hey, if you like that video, hit the like button or leave a comment below. It really helps get the show to more people.
>> And if you'd like to get the full show ad free and in your inbox every morning, you can sign up at breakingpoints.com.
>> That's right. Get the full show. Help support the future of independent media at breakingpoints.com.