Transcription
I want wormholes everywhere. Like in the back of your refrigerator connected to your ger. Okay, now you're going Homer Simpson on me. Wouldn't it be fun if we were just the nth intelligent civilization to rise up on planet Earth? I think we would see a record of this somewhere somewhere in the fossils, right? There'd be a Statue of Liberty sticking out of the ground. Damn you. Damn you, old [Music] Star talk cosmic queries. Oh yeah. Chuck, hey, you going to help me out here? Of course. Yeah. You know, I never see these questions in advance. They come from our Patreon supporters, people who are entry level. Yes. That's all it takes is $5 a month and we uh you know, it's been $5 a month for years. And you know why? Because we don't believe in inflation unlike some other people. So, is there a theme today? Nope. This is a grab bag. Just random whatever they want. Ask me anything. Let the people speak and ask. Okay, let's get right into it. Inquiring minds want to know. Here we go. Let's get right into it. Okay. Eric 44 says, "Hey, legends." Eric here, exercise physiologist and spaceflight physiology researcher from New York City. Love it. Look at that. Love it. He says, "My question is, all motion requires time, but does all time include motion?"
I would say the measurement of time requires not only motion but something that repeats. Okay, think about it. Right? Have you ever measured time with something that did not repeat periodically? The answer is no. No, you can't. A day repeats every day, seconds repeat, everything repeats, months repeat, years repeat. So where there is no repeated motion, there can be no coherent measure of time. All you'd be able to do in your own reference frame is sequence events. Mhm. This came before that. Before that, right? I remember in the before four times. No, the the before 444 times. Right. I'm older than you. Before four four. So now the sequence of events can be different depending on your reference frame relativistically. You could be moving in a different direction and you'll experience those events in a different sequence than I will. But in my reference frame, like I said, if nothing repeats, time cannot be measured, right, with any meaning or or or repeatability. So that's a great it's a fun interesting philosophical question. Yeah. And but space can exist without a time. I would think space don't need time. No, it doesn't. I mean, it's space is like I'm here, you know, I'm not going anywhere. Yeah. You want to measure something? That's your business. That's what you I don't care what you measure. I'm right here. So, there you go. That's very cool. Well, there you go. Eric 4. Oh, I answered that quickly. That was a great one. Wow. Well, we're in. We're off. We're off like a rocket. Uh, this is Maurice Backer says, "Dear Lord Nice, dear Dr. Tyson, I am Ilatta from the Netherlands and I am 12. My question is, what is the one book that every 12-year-old should read? And my name is pronounced El Elida. Okay, thanks for the phonetic there, Elida. He knew in advance. Yeah, I called you IA and uh yada yada yada. Anyway, uh no, no. Okay, Elida. And I didn't get it right. She asked, I should read these beforehand. Uh anyway, universal respect and greetings. Delightful. What a mature 12-year-old. What a very mature 12-year-old. That's clearly not written by an American kid. Without a doubt, you know. Yeah. So, I'm very biased here because I only write books that I think people should read to get them enlightened about the universe. Okay? And I find gaps in the publishing landscape. All right. Scientific landscape I say I'm gonna I'm gonna bridge that gap put something there I'm gonna put something there right so I can say at age 12 writing like that and plus the Dutch they they're fluent in English yeah well I mean yeah without a doubt okay so even though they're No you're mixing that up with the sweets with the sweets I know but it's funnier when you know I like Dutch is actually That's actually Dutch. But it doesn't make for a funnier, you know, makes for a funny joke. But anyway, you're right. My book, Astrophysics for People in a Hurry. Okay. Okay. Has a young people's version of it. Oh. Called Astrophysics for young people in a hurry. Now, I keep thinking young people should never be in a hurry. Yeah. Well, they got to get back to them video games. You know what I mean? I got to read this real quick cuz Valerin is waiting. Halo ain't gonna play itself. Gotta get back to the video game. Let me see what Neil says before I get back to Roblox. So So that book was conceived for ages 8 to 12. Oh wow. Which collectively is called The Twins. Right. Right. And its value is it's not just that it's is it dumbed down? No, it's it folds in a lot of my own background when I was that age cuz I was a geek kid. And so you get to sort of live with me through your own years that you're reading the book. That's cool. Okay. So it might have still have value to a precocious 12-year-old, right? But if not, then just go right to astrophysics for people in a hurry. It's not astrophysics. It's it's real astrophysics. Astrophysics. It's astrophysics, but I have cherry picked it for the coolest stuff in the whole universe, right? And that's what's there from Big Bang. I call it the book you should read when you don't really want to know the granular details, but you want to be able to have a cool conversation as a cocktail party. That'll totally equip you to do so. Exactly. So, there's that. But then if he just wants to have fun, definitely the Merlin book. Oh, okay. Merlin's Tour of the Universe. There's a Q&A. He's asking a Q question answer right now. Uh it's illustrated by my brother. It's just a fun I think it's a fun book. So forgive me for recommending my own for shamelessly promoting myself. No, you're supposed to. That's great. Yeah, it's not shameless. I'm doing it with No, you're doing it with Right. I know. Like I know what I'm doing. Ain't no shame attached here. So, I think he will enjoy those. I'm certain of it. Okay. Cuz they're written with that in mind. That's all. Now, is it Elida a boy's name or a girl's name? I don't know. I don't know. He or she. Elida. Elida. Yeah. Okay. Let's neutral. Let's degenderize it. Yeah. We'll call them they. They. So, Elida, sorry to misgender you if in fact that's what I did. But those I think any of those three books will as Chuck said uh you can get some good reading in between video game playing ain't going to play itself. There you go. Hi, here is Andrew Bowen. I'm riding at the edge of our universe since the big bang and moving with the expansion. What does it look like when I'm facing back at us? And what does it look like when I'm facing outward ahead?
It looks just like it does here and now. Ooh, we are at the horizon of anybody who's at our horizon. Exactly. And anybody at our horizon sees the universe all around them like anybody else does. There you go. Yeah. Yep. That's right. So what'll h what would happen is if you in this imagine this instant go to our horizon in this instant light from us emitted 13.8 billion years ago is only now just reaching you. Right? You will see all of us as galaxies being born, right? So this would be your horizon. That's what that's what it is how that works. So yeah, that's that's so cool. We are all equally as far away from the origin of the universe as each other. It's like being in the middle of the ocean. Yes. Yes. Yeah. You go to your horizon. You're still in the ocean. You're still in the ocean. Right. That's so cool. Wow. Great question, Andrew. I love it. Oh, by the way, we don't know how far the universe extends beyond our horizon, right? Just way you don't there might be a point where land shows up, right? No matter how big the ocean is. So, there might be a point where you run out of galaxies in the univer stuff, right? Right. But we don't know that because because every direction we look, we see galaxies being born. So, we are deep within a space-time continuum that's much larger than our own bubble. That's so But you know what happened? If if if if one day Yeah. the cosmic microwave background disappears. Uh-oh. And that would mean that our horizon which is expanding at what rate? Well, it's got to be Well, suppose isn't it faster than the speed of light? No, no, no, no. Just a visual horizon is is is expanding at one lighty year per year. Right. So, in a billion years, we'll be 14.8 billion years to our visual horizon. All right. So the point is if the cosmic microwave background disappears, right? And then you just see galaxies up to that edge that means our horizon is washing over a part of the universe where there is no matter. There are no galaxies. Oh. And we would have reached the edge of any material substance in the universe. Right. Cuz we're now wait is that because we're traveling? No. No. Well, I'm No, no. Our horizon is continuing to move out. Because it's moving out. It's moving out. It's moving out. So, it will always find a galaxy being born. Right. Okay. That's until it doesn't. I I got you. And so, Right. Once we get past that, that means nothing's there. Nothing's there. Oh. Correct. Snap. That's like That's finally getting beyond the ocean and land, right? Yeah. All right. Wow, that was cool. In a show like Star Talk, we jump from black holes to biotech to brain chemistry because science is both complex and interconnected. But we don't just throw ideas at you. We organize them, frame them, and make sense of how they fit together. That's exactly what ground news does for the news. Instead of just feeding you headlines, it zooms out, showing you how stories are being reported, who's reporting them, and what's being left out. Like a telescope for the media landscape, it helps you see not just the brightest signals, but the whole constellation of perspectives. Think of it like a peer review for the news. Instead of just trusting one headline, Ground News lets you track the evidence and form your own conclusion based on the full picture. And right now, Star Talk listeners can try the top tier Vantage plan for just $5 a month, which is a 40% discount. So, if you're into science, but lean a little skeptical and want to see the whole story, head to ground.news/staruk news/star talk or scan the QR code to subscribe. Stay curious and stay grounded. Now, back to the show. So, let's go to Young Han. Young Han. Spell Young. Uh, Y O N G. Okay. Young Han, who says, "Mr. Tyson, I love your work and your show. Can you talk about the Curan hypothesis and how it impacts how we should view our own species, civilizations, and specialness or lack thereof here on Earth? If advanced civilization is so fleeting and difficult to detect in our own fossil record, is it going to be easier or harder to detect in space? Wouldn't it be fun if we were just the nth intelligent civilization to rise up on planet Earth or even the nth civilization of humans that had rose up and destroyed the rose up again multiple times. Right? So you'd think I think we would see a record of this somewhere somewhere in the fossils, right? You'd think, right? There'd be a Statue of Liberty sticking out of the ground. Damn you. Damn you all. You apes. You there be I mean that that's an example of a of a civilization that predated the the planet of the apes because that was Earth, right? Okay. It seems to me we would find a record of it. If we find bones, we find other fossilized artifacts of dinosaurs from 65 million years ago. Right. Then, and by the way, the biggest mammals of the day were these tiny little rodents running underfoot trying to not get eaten by T-Rex as orves. Yeah. Okay. So you can't presume that would have that there were big brain mammals before that because that was the origin of the mammals on earth right around that time around that time right is there a possibility that the civilization before us were not mamlian okay so I I haven't seen any like dinosaur casinos or I mean just you would see things and we we're not that we're not ignorant of the history of what happened in Earth's crust. Here's where you'd have a problem. Go ahead. You can ask the question, what is the time scale for all of Earth's crust to get subducted back down and come out in a volcano? Oh, cuz that would destroy all, right? All the all the evidence would be gone because it become molten and then it would spew out again and cover the earth completely gone, right? Okay. So different parts of the earth are younger than other parts. The middle of Iceland is brand new, right? Like made yesterday. All of the big island of Hawaii. Iceland is on the mid-Atlantic ridge that is spewing out. I visited there recently. It's this this is a whole new land between where I was standing and another ledge on the other side. And I did the math because continents drift about the rate your fingernails grow. Oh wow. So I did a fast and I calculated how many millions of years that would have taken but still it's new land compared to other places. You go to places where it's not regenerated that rapidly and you don't find other evidence. Okay. So so yeah. Yeah. It's very unlikely is which is Yeah. Unless the dinosaurs were like the ABC TV show that used to be what show called dinosaurs where you never saw that? No. I just remember it was a little dinosaur and when I just remember the cartoon Land Before Time. I remember that one. Oh, yeah. A Land Before Time. I don't Do I know that one? It was a cartoon movie. Yeah. I don't think I know that one. But yeah, dinosaurs there was like Oh, they were they were just living. They were just living like regular human beings. They had jobs. They had And every everybody worked for one corporation called the We Say So Corporation. And uh How did I miss this? Yeah. And then there was one little baby dinosaur. And every time his father would come in the room, he would jump on his head and hit him with a pot and go, "Not the mama. Not the mama." In other words, like, "I don't want you. Get me, mom." So this is So this is like the Flintstones except they're dinosaurs. Yeah, that's it. There's a whole world that they a whole world just like the Flintstones, but all run by dinosaurs. Okay. It was a pretty pretty wild little show back in the day. Okay. There's a thing about like the size of their brains, you know? There's an issue there. Oh, okay. Just the higher levels of high levels of thought might not be re happening in a dinosaur whose brain. It's an intriguing idea and I don't but I don't I think we would see evidence of it and we don't. Gotcha. And so in that case, the absence of evidence is evidence of absence. Oo, I love it. Which is not always the case. Not always the case. Yes. All right. This is James H. English who says, "Hello, Dr. Tyson Lord Nice." It's James from Denmark. Uh by the way, James, uh we apologize. Uh we're so sorry and you know all this talk uh of Greenland, we have nothing to do with it. Okay, we're just letting you know. All right. It's it's like, you know, it's like our uncle got into the liquor cabinet while he was on his meds and now he's just sitting in a chair going, I know we should buy Greenland. That's what I think. So, I'm sorry. So, here's what James says. I heard on a previous episode that what we think of as singularities at the heart of a black hole may not actually exist, but I'm not sure I understood. We know black holes exist, but what does it mean to say the singularities may just be mathematical artifacts?
Yeah, good question. Love these. Pretty wild. So if you just follow general relativity math, right, the the the object collapses under its own weight. Mhm. As it collapses, the gravity on its surface continues to rise. It reaches a point where the gravity on the surface has an escape velocity greater than the speed of light. At that point, light does not escape, but it continues to collapse. When we talk about the size of a black hole, functionally we're talking about the size of the event horizon. Mhm. But inside the event horizon, all bets are off. So the matter keeps shrinking. According to the general theory of relativity, the gravity is so severe that nothing can stop it and it shrinks to zero volume. Yeah. Right. And wow, that and that's just crazy. What does that even mean? Yeah. What does it mean? We all presume that there's some other law of physics that's going to prevent that. But that calculation is at the limits of the applicability of the general theory of relativity. Got you. So that's why we know in advance that the general theory of relativity has limits. Right? Limits to its applicability. There you go. Right. And whereas quantum physics have yet to find a limit. And we got smart people on that frontier, string theorists, who are trying to send the math into that singularity to try to resolve that problem. And it's because if you do, then you reconcile you reconcile general relativity with quantum physics. Yes, you will. Yeah. That's pretty wild. Yeah. And more playfully, this fact that it goes to zero, right? Some people say that's where God divides by zero. Okay. Cuz you know remember you're not supposed to you can't do that or you're not supposed to do it. I still don't know why. I'm just like you know. Have you tried it cuz 0 divided by 0 is I got nothing. No that's undefined. Right. That's my point. But I can't define it. I started with nothing. I divided nothing. I got nothing from nothing. There you go. That's a good song. Billy is nothing. When I first heard that song I said really is that the best math you can give me in this disco era? I was I was in high school when that came Everybody was high on cocaine. They weren't trying to do math. It's like, who you trying to impress with this math here? Certainly. I could hook you up with some good formulas. Oh, that's so funny. Okay. Okay. Here we go. Uh, this is Michael Trilling. He says, I'm an artist and I have been working in stained glass recently. It had me thinking, how can light travel through some materials but not others? What makes something transparent at an atomic level?
Yeah, so I don't I don't have a good answer for that. I have an answer but I know in advance it's it's not good. Correct. What I So I'm I'm giving like a just so answer to that. Okay. So transparent media Mhm. there's nothing to change the pathway of the light through the medium and so it maintains a straight direction. Okay. Okay. And so it comes out the other side. you see whatever was on the previous side of that material. If the structure of the lattice or the molecules or the atoms is such that the light is either absorbed or dispersed because it can still be transparent to light, but you can't see through it, right? What's the word for? Translucent. Translucent. Okay. Light still gets through. Frosted glass. Frosted glass. But the path the light took was varied. And so there's no coherent image that comes through to the other side. Gotcha. Here's a little known fact. As this person surely knows, light travels slower in a medium than it travels in a vacuum, right? It travels slowest in a diamond, which helps it internally reflect so that when light comes in from one direction, it pops out a different direction. Right. When when it's cut when the facets are just right. Right. Right. Right. So that's why diamonds have a certain radiance of their own when they're just really messing with the light that came in. So, Bri uh Rihanna was wrong. It's not shine bright like a diamond. It's just reflect refract light like a diamond. What was that from? Oceans 8. No, she she has a song shine bright like a diamond. Oh, sorry. I didn't know that shining. It's not shining. Yeah, it's not shining at all. Right. Yeah. Is that where they put her in Oceans 8? Probably. And that and she's Rihanna. Okay. Okay. Couple more. Go. All right. Here we go. Alex Romeilian says this. Greetings, Dr. Tyson, and your rag tag team of lifelong learners. I'm Alex from Northeast England. My question, there's a lot of talk about mining the moon. Wouldn't that be a bad idea considering if we're transferring mass from the moon to Earth, we won't make the moon lighter because of the gravitational effects it has on Earth, uh, i.e. the tides to weaken over time and eventually stop. What other effects could it have? Regards from a lifelong learner.
I love it and I love lifelong learners. Yes. Thank you for checking in. Yes. Okay. Couple of things. Couple things. First, two things. Uh so it is likely that whatever we mine on the moon will stay on the moon or go to other places in the solar system where we're doing work. Right? It's not likely that the moon has something so valuable that we need to bring back to Earth, especially since the moon was carved out of our crust in a collision between a Mars-Sized protolanet and Earth, right? It sideswipes up our crust goes into orbit, coaleses to form the moon, right? And so the moon is it's our crust. That's probably not too valuable. No, it's not too valuable. Not too valuable to go there and then bring it back. So now the but suppose we did suppose we mined 100% of the moon. All right. Brought the whole damn moon back piece by piece. I love it. Okay. All right. We still have tides. Right. From the sun. The sun. All right. Cuz sun tides are about a third as strong as the moon tides. Right. All right. So you still have tides. Not as big, not as bodacious, but you still have tides. How much heavier does Earth weigh? The moon is a little more than 1% the mass of the Earth. Oh, that's nothing. That's nothing. That ain't doing nothing. That ain't That ain't doing That's a mosquito. Like if if So if you weigh 100 mosquito on an elephant. So if you weigh so 100 pounds on Earth Mhm. you'd weigh [Music] one pound and a little and change. No, that's that's barely You fluctuate that not worth the between meals and between poop. Okay. You you fluctuate. That happens to me every morning. You know what I mean? Get up on the scale like, damn. Go to the bathroom. All right. So, yeah, it's not. Don't worry about it. Yeah, it's it's it's a big moon, but Earth is even bigger. There you go. We good. All right. This is Bass Sterved. And Bass says, "Greetings, Dr. Tyson, Sir Chuck, Bass from the Netherlands. Here, something that's bothered me for a while is the term time. Ooh. Why do we still call it that? Time isn't absolute. It's relative and experienced differently depending on our motion through spaceime. A photon doesn't experience time at all. Wouldn't it perhaps be better to rename time in a scientific context? Would something like observer related perception of reality not be a better representative of what we should call time? I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. Have a beautiful day.
I don't have more time for this, Mr. Sterald. Okay. I have one answer. So, it's a cool cool little thing that he's positing. Time has one syllable. Exactly. And what he read there, count the syllables. Count the syllables. uh observer relative perception of reality. It's 14 syllables. 14 syllables. Time has one syllable, right? Exactly. So, we So take that word and make it mean what we want it to mean. And by the way, and that's the meaning of the word. And you can't even say what time is it with his. You would have to say what is your observer related perception of reality right now. And there's certain things that we do just because it's simple. For example, our words that describe the sun and the horizon are pre-Capernac. I don't say to you, Chuck, at what time does Earth rotate such that our sight line to the horizon reveals the sun sitting out there in space. I instead I say, when sunrise and when's sunset and when sunset, right? And I think we're we're okay with that. Yeah, cuz the sun didn't really rise at all. Well, from your point of view, right? But still, it's a simple two two syllable word. So, so I don't mind precision, but not at the expense of economy. All right. Very cool. All right. Here we go. This is Zachu. And Zach says, "Hello, Dr. Tyson Lord." Nice. Zack here from Moonsville, New York or Munsville, New York. You've talked about knowing mathematically how to create a wormhole in previous cosmic queries and other explainers. I was wondering what is keeping us from taking the mathematics from paper and applying them to the physical world going from script to screen so to speak.
Oh, I like that. Thanks in advance. I like that. So, the problem is we're missing an ingredient. Oh, really? Yes. We need matter. Mhm. Or some substance that has negative gravity. Uhoh. Okay. So, matter has gravity, right? So, matter can make black holes where you're compressing things down into one place, right? And a wormhole requires you pry open the fabric of spaceime. Gotcha. So, you'd be parking this negative matter, this negative gravity substance in a way that you pried open a tunnel through the fabric of spaceime. The fabric of spaceime itself. Wow. So, we would know how to configure it, how much of it we need, but we don't have it. Gotcha. Now, there are people who say, "Well, what about dark energy?" That's a negative gravity in the back in the back of space of space. Right. Since we don't know what it is, I'm not saying let's set up a factory to make wormholes out of it. I'm not ready to do that. Okay. Right. And if one day we know what it is and then we can harness it and then package it and sell it. Yeah. Yeah. And I'm all in for for wormholes. Oh my gosh, that'd be very cool. I want wormholes everywhere. Yeah, like in the back of your refrigerator connected to your ger. Okay, now you're going Homer Simpson on me. No, I'm running low on milk to check on you. I just reach into the refrigerator. I'm at the grocery store. Grab some milk. Oh, no. No. The grocery does that for you? Oh. Oh, he'll have your package. Oh, he stocks your fridge from the wormhole because they just open it up. All right, I'll take it back. That's dope. That's totally dope. Oh, I love it. Yeah. You're never low on any supply and they'll know the rate and you don't have to go travel. Yeah. And Oh my gosh. Wow. That is fresh direct direct. That's the wormhole edition of Fresh. So, and there's so many things that we just take for granted require transportation systems that would just be rendered obsolete with wormholes such as on Star Trek the transporter. Right. Right. You don't need to deconstruct your entire body molecularly, put it into a pattern buffer and then beam it somewhere and recreate it hoping you get the hoping that you get the same pattern in the exact same sequence. Neurosynetic memories and everything. Yeah. You just walk through a portal and you're there. Now you're there. Yeah. That's it would render that solution to travel obsolete. Yeah. But it would just ruin like the most awesome effect that Star Trek came up with, which is it's very cool. All right, Chuck, we got time for two more. All right, we got a lot done. We got a lot done today. Wow. All right, here we go. Am I getting better at giving short answers? Maybe. I think the questions might be helping. No, I'm joking. Yes. Here we go. This is James uh Liot. Hi y'all. This is James from Midland, Texas. Midland, Texas. I know Midland, Texas. The place where baby Jessica fell down the well. James, let me explain something to you. James, let me just let me just help you out for a second. Stop. That is not a claim to fame. That y'all let a little baby fall down a hole and that you couldn't get her out and that the whole country had to find about it. The whole country learned about the whole country learned about it before you were able to get this child out of that hole. Okay. I know Midland. It's a the twin cities there. Midland and Odessa. Midland and Odessa. Okay. Yeah. Midland. The rich folk live in Midland. Oh, okay. Well, back when I was there, that was that was it. It was a very clear clearly understood divide. I got you. In in the in the landscape. All right. All right. Well, James says this. Since photons have no mass, how do they carry the image of their source to say a telescope or an eyeball? So, what does it mean to say uh we see something because we process photons? There seems to be nothing there in a photon to process. Where in the mass in the massless energy of a photon is this information that we receive? This keeps bugging me, man. So, please help. Let me hook up my my boy from from Midland. From Midland. All right. Now, Mid Midland, Texas. Midland, Texas. Midland. So, here you go. Here we go. If you took all the photons and just crammed them through the one little opening and didn't have a lens, right? Then you would not have an image, you would just have light. That's what we do when we take a spectrum of an object. We take all the light, funnel it down into what's called a slit, goes through the prism or equivalent device, and you see how much energy, how many photons of different wavelengths is coming from that source. It's not an image at all. It's not an image. You don't know what the hell the thing looks like, but you have this many that are red, this many blue photons. This has extra photons in a particular place cuz an atom is sending you energy extra in that zone. And you just look at the spectrum and that is a no image measurement of the object. If you take the photons and have a lens, then there's a photon that came from your nose, a photon that came from your toe, a photon that came from the top of your head. It's a different color because your hair is black, your skin is brown, your shoes are red. And so this will be a red photon. This will be a black photon. And the lens reconstructs where they came from onto your detector. You focus it up. The photon lands exactly according to what the image was. So you're right. A photon alone contains no image information. You need the ensemble of photons to do so. Wow. Dude, that was a really good question. Yeah, I I hope he feels good about that. Yeah, that you should be. That's I I learned something just then. That That's really damn cool. All right, last question as you said. All right, this is Alan Short. You went from the Netherlands to Midland Odessa to Denmark. Yep. To northeast England. Well, you're gonna love this one. This is Alan Short from Thailand. Thailand? No, I'm joking. I'm lying. This is Alan Short from Italy. Italy. Italy. Bonjour. Allan. He says, "With a profound admiration and the utmost awe of Professor Tyson and HRH Chuck Nice." I don't know what HR means. His Royal Highness. I'll take it. [Music] Uh, and when I was a kid, when you know we have juvenile sensing, we say his worldy. Yeah. I was about to say and that's cuz that's exactly I was going to say Royal Heine parts but don't Yeah. Royal Heiny. Okay. According to one theory, our universe is located inside of a black hole. If this is the case, where is our universe's singularity? Likewise, seeing as we have proof that our universe is expanding, why are we not seeing other black holes presumably themselves being self-contained universes expanding and taking over our universe with much love? Thank you, Allan.
I I Brian Green would be better to answer that, so I'll give what I can. Okay. All right. So, a couple of things. All right. Some equations related to a black hole apply to our entire universe. Okay. Such as we have an event horizon. We we have a horizon, right? We do. It's analogous to event horizon of a black hole. Correct. We if you look at the density of matter in the universe out to that event horizon, it is the density of matter you would need to make a black hole the size of our universe. So there's c but is it a black hole? Okay. And so if it is then there ought to be a singularity somewhere that we haven't seen. We don't know where it is, right? Okay. And so unless we're just the information of the black hole. Oh. And so what we're seeing is the holographic information of the black hole. The black hole is inside our black. More than information. I want to be I want to be a boy. And it's And that's Italian. That's a Pinocchio reference. Pinocchio reference. We have done it people. That is how you stick a lamp in a go to Italy and end up with Pinocchio. All right, so that could be just where the analogy breaks between the universe and what a black hole is. They have a couple similarities, but one last point and we'll end on this that the equations of a black hole and I there's a book here that I can dig out that will describe them and you're our guy correctly noted that a whole new spaceime opens up inside the black hole. If you look back at us, the future history of the universe runs its course and a whole other spaceime opens up. So each black hole would contain a universe. A universe. And but that universe is not sharing the spaceime of our universe. So if they're worried, will it fill up or bump in? No. In higher dimensions, you can fit everything. Right. It all it Yeah. It doesn't make a difference. That's right. You can fit it all. That's so cool. Just a quick thing. You have a sheet of paper that goes to infinity, right? It's two dimensions. If I go into a third dimension, I can have another sheet of paper that goes to and it does not intersect the first. Exactly. In fact, I can have an infinite number of infinite sheets of paper above the other. Correct. So, when you add higher dimensions, you don't have to think or worry about, you know, stepping on each other's toes. Cool. It can happen. You just It's It's not a thing, right? All right. Yeah. I think we got to call it quits there, Chuck. Well, that was a good one. That was That was very hodgepodge. Yeah, I like it. I like it when they're all over the place and all over the world. All over the world. All right. Very good. This has been a star talk cosmic queries grabbag edition. Those are fun. Yeah, love those. Neil Chuck, thanks for doing this. Always a pleasure. All right, Neil deGrasse Tyson, your personal astrophysicist reporting from my office planetary. As always, keep looking up. [Music]